DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry Into the Transmission Gully Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry Into the Transmission Gully Proposal Final Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry into the Transmission Gully Proposal Produced under Section 149R of the Resource Management Act 1991 Volume 1 Published by the Board of Inquiry into the Transmission Gully Proposal Publication No: EPA 0175 ISBN: 978-0-478-34877-4 (print) 978-0-478-34878-1 (electronic) 978-0-478-34879-8 (CD) June 2012 BEFORE THE BOARD OF INQUIRY CONCERNING REQUESTS FOR NOTICES OF REQUIREMENT AND APLICATIONS FOR RESOURCE CONSENTS TO ALLOW THE TRANSMISSION GULLY PROJECT IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the deliberations of a Board of Inquiry appointed under Section 149J of the Act to consider requests for notices of requirement and applications for resource consents by New Zealand Transport Agency, Porirua City Council and Transpower New Zealand Limited in respect of the Transmission Gully Project HEARING AT: Wellington commencing on 13 February 2012 and ending on 14 March 2012 REPRESENTATIONS: See Section 10 Board: Environment Judge Brian Dwyer (Chairperson) Environment Commissioner Russell Howie (Member) David McMahon (Member) David Mitchell (Member) Glenice Paine (Member) FINAL DECISION AND REPORT OF BOARD OF INQUIRY UNDER SECTION 149R OF THE ACT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 1 2. OUTLINE OF TGP PROPOSAL AND REASONS FOR IT................................ 2 3. BACKGROUND, REFERENCE TO BOARD OF INQUIRY, AND MINISTER’S REASONS ................................................................................... 7 3.1 TGP PLAN CHANGE TO THE WELLINGTON REGIONAL FRESHWATER PLAN AND EXISTING DESIGNATION............................................................ 10 4. CONDUCT OF THE INQUIRY AND MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED UNDER SECTION 149P OF THE RMA........................................................... 12 5. MINUTES AND DIRECTIONS ISSUED........................................................... 14 6. PROCEDURES ............................................................................................... 15 6.1 SUBMISSIONS ............................................................................................... 15 6.2 PRE-HEARING CONFERENCES ................................................................... 15 6.3 GENERAL ....................................................................................................... 15 6.4 EVIDENCE...................................................................................................... 16 6.5 CONFERENCING ........................................................................................... 16 7. OUTLINE OF PROPOSAL.............................................................................. 18 7.1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PROPOSAL........................................................... 18 7.2 STATUTORY APPLICATIONS, AND APPROVALS NEEDED ........................ 20 7.3 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION ....................................................................... 21 7.4 PROJECT HISTORY....................................................................................... 23 8. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK FOR DELIBERATIONS ................................... 24 8.1 JURISDICTION OF THE BOARD OF INQUIRY .............................................. 24 8.2 NOTICES OF REQUIREMENT FOR DESIGNATION...................................... 24 8.3 APPLICATIONS FOR RESOURCE CONSENTS ............................................ 24 8.4 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARD FOR ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION ACTIVITIES (NESETA) ....................................................... 25 9. REPORTS TO THE BOARD ........................................................................... 26 9.1 S149G RMA .................................................................................................... 26 9.2 REPORT FROM THE WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL ......................... 27 9.3 REPORT FROM KAPITI COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL .................................. 27 9.4 REPORT FROM PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL................................................... 27 9.5 REPORT FROM UPPER HUTT CITY COUNCIL ............................................ 27 9.6 REPORT FROM WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL............................................ 28 9.7 S42A RMA ...................................................................................................... 28 10. SPECIFIC ISSUES.......................................................................................... 30 11. LEGAL ISSUES .............................................................................................. 42 11.1 OBJECTIVES OF THE REQUIRING AUTHORITY.......................................... 42 11.2 ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................. 44 11.3 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.................................................................. 47 11.4 THE EXISTING DESIGNATION FOR TRANSMISSION GULLY ..................... 49 11.5 ADDITIONAL CONSENTS .............................................................................. 50 11.6 REVOCATION OF STATE HIGHWAY STATUS.............................................. 51 11.7 SECTION 107 RMA......................................................................................... 57 11.8 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT ............................................................................ 60 11.9 APPROVAL/CERTIFICATION......................................................................... 66 12. REGIONAL AND PROJECT-WIDE EFFECTS................................................ 71 12.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................. 71 12.2 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT.......................................................................... 71 12.3 SEDIMENT...................................................................................................... 88 12.4 HYDROLOGY ............................................................................................... 102 12.5 TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY ........................................................................... 105 12.6 FRESHWATER ECOLOGY........................................................................... 116 12.7 MARINE ECOLOGY...................................................................................... 124 12.8 NOISE AND VIBRATION (OPERATIONAL) .................................................. 131 12.9 CONSTRUCTION NOISE AND VIBRATION ................................................. 147 12.10 AIR QUALITY AND RELATED HEALTH EFFECTS ...................................... 150 12.11 CONTAMINATED LAND ............................................................................... 155 12.12 TANGATA WHENUA..................................................................................... 156 12.13 ARCHAEOLOGY AND BUILT HERITAGE .................................................... 161 12.14 SOCIAL......................................................................................................... 165 12.15 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL EFFECTS.......................................................... 176 12.16 DIRECT PROPERTY EFFECTS ................................................................... 181 13. THE TRANSPOWER APPLICATION............................................................ 191 13.1 OVERVIEW AND PRELIMINARY MATTERS................................................ 191 13.2 SUBMISSIONS ............................................................................................. 191 13.3 WITNESSES ................................................................................................. 193 13.4 ISSUES ARISING ......................................................................................... 193 13.5 VISUAL AND LANDSCAPE EFFECTS.......................................................... 194 13.6 EARTHWORKS AND CONTAMINATION...................................................... 196 13.7 ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS.............................................................................. 197 13.8 EFFECTS ON HISTORIC HERITAGE........................................................... 198 13.9 EFFECTS ON SENSITIVE LAND USES ....................................................... 198 13.10 CLEARANCE OF TREES AND VEGETATION.............................................. 199 13.11 RESTORATION OF LAND/EFFECTS AND TIMING OF CONSTRUCTION WORKS ........................................................................... 200 13.12 OVERVIEW OF EFFECTS ASSESSMENT................................................... 200 13.13 CONDITIONS................................................................................................ 201 13.14 MAIN FINDINGS ON TRANSPOWER APPLICATIONS ................................ 202 14. MANAGEMENT PLANS ............................................................................... 203 14.1 CONTEXT ..................................................................................................... 203 14.2 THE MANAGMENT PLANS: NATURE AND CONTENT............................... 204 14.3 MANAGEMENT PLANS CONSIDERED UNDER THE OUTLINE PLAN UMBRELLA................................................................................................... 204 14.4 MANAGEMENT PLANS CONSIDERED UNDER THE CEMP....................... 209 14.5 MANAGEMENT PLANS CONSIDERED UNDER THE TRANSPOWER APPLICATION............................................................................................... 213 15. CONDITIONS...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Environment Court of New Zealand Wellington Registry I Te
    In the Environment Court of New Zealand Wellington Registry I Te Kooti Taiao O Aotearoa Te Whanganui-a-Tara Rohe ENV-2019-WLG- Under the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) In the matter of an appeal under clause 14(1) of the First Schedule to the Act Between Transpower New Zealand Limited Appellant And Wellington Regional Council Respondent Notice of appeal by Transpower New Zealand Limited Dated 17 September 2019 89 The Terrace P +64 4 472 7877 PO Box 10246 F +64 4 472 2291 Wellington 6143 DX SP26517 Solicitor: N McIndoe E [email protected] 7897549 To The Registrar Environment Court Wellington 1 Transpower New Zealand Limited (‘Transpower’) appeals against the decisions of the Wellington Regional Council (the ‘Respondent’) on the proposed Natural Resources Plan for the Wellington Region (the ‘Proposed Plan’). Transpower owns and operates the National Grid, and its assets across the Wellington Region include 12 substations, 25 transmission lines, three submarine cables, four high voltage direct current links, five overhead fibre cables, and seven communications sites. 2 Transpower made a submission and further submission on the Proposed Plan. 3 Transpower is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the Resource Management Act 1991 (‘RMA’). 4 Transpower received notice of the decisions on 31 July 2019. 5 The decisions were made by the Respondent. Provisions being appealed 6 The part of the decision that Transpower is appealing is the Respondent’s decisions on the Proposed Plan that relate to regionally significant infrastructure, and in particular the operation, maintenance, upgrading and development of the National Grid.
    [Show full text]
  • Roading Projects - New Zealand Transport Agency (Lead Agency) Progressing As Planned Key Milestone Achieved in This Quarter ☺
    Attachment 4 to Report 09.216 Page 1 of 3 Roading Projects - New Zealand Transport Agency (Lead Agency) Progressing as planned Key milestone achieved in this Quarter ☺ Project Status (for projects with start dates before 2016) Moderate delay Significant delay (more than two years) Project Overall Partner Progress Indicative Start (Year) Corridor Project Name Project Description Comments Delay No. Progress Agencies Issues Investigation Design Construction Western 20 MacKays Overbridge Completion of the bridge over the North Island Main Trunk Rail Line on SH1 100% - Complete Complete Complete Practical completion achieved & south of Paraparaumu. surfacing issues resolved. Reshaping & surfacing enhancing (OGPA) work now complete. Western 21 Travel Demand Allowance for implementation of advanced traffic management measures & 94% PCC Complete Complete Nearing VMS installed at various locations Management Western high occupancy vehicle lanes on the Western Corridor strategic roading KCDC completion across Wellington region. CCTV Corridor network. Details have yet to be determined. installed on Centennial Highway is 100% (Advanced Traffic Regional Variable Message Signs (VMS) installation on SH 1 & 2 to advise operational. Testing & commissioning of Management System motorists of congestion, incidents, detour options, etc. CCTV complete. and High Occupancy See TDM Plan action no. 1.1 for detail on other corridors. Vehicle Lane) Western 22 Centennial Highway Continuation of the existing trial wire rope barrier to cover the whole length of 100% - Complete Complete Complete Barrier completed. Median Barrier (CMB) the coastal section of SH1 between Paekakariki and Pukerua Bay. Western 26 Pukerua Bay Safety Allowance for safety improvements, largely directed at addressing pedestrian 5% PCC Nearing Indicative start in Indicative start in Following a 29 July 2008 meeting re Improvements conflicts, in the urban section of Pukerua Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Gully Project – Nzta, Pcc and Transpower Limited Applications
    TRANSMISSION GULLY PROJECT – NZTA, PCC AND TRANSPOWER LIMITED APPLICATIONS Summary of Submissions November 2011 Ref Submitter Position Application Summary of Submission To be Decision Requested of Interest heard? 0001 John Pfahlert Support All Unqualified support for the project to assist in providing improved arterial roading into and out of the Wellington No Not stated. Region. 0002 Ivan Rowe Support in All Support, with the following exception, to better link TG into Porirua: No Not stated. part - The Kenepuru interchange should also link the southbound existing SH1 motorway to the northbound TG; and the southbound TG to the northbound existing SH1. 0003 Dave Not stated Not stated If funded from National roading funds then no objection. Not Not stated. Johnston Depends on If funded from a combination of national roading funds, regional petrol taxes and rates increase and tolls then stated funding opposed. Suggests a more economical project around upgrading existing road (refer to submission for details). TG is as fault prone as Centennial Highway. 0004 Wayne Erb Oppose in All TG motor way doesn‟t represent prudent management of the country‟s resources. No Reject the applications. full. Motorway is unnecessary in medium term - Oil and petrol prices volatile and on an upward trend, this will flatten demand for motor vehicles / driving kilometres. Electric vehicle (substitute) will be slow and expensive. Unnecessary burden on state finances Oil prices threaten to dampen economic growth which would disrupt government revenue 0005 Grant Support in full All Wish to see TG proceed immediately. Yes Approve immediately. Corleison 0006 Ballinger Support in full All Economic and social benefits are large.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Corridor Plan Adopted August 2012 Western Corridor Plan 2012 Adopted August 2012
    Western Corridor Plan Adopted August 2012 Western Corridor Plan 2012 Adopted August 2012 For more information, contact: Greater Wellington Published September 2012 142 Wakefield Street GW/CP-G-12/226 PO Box 11646 Manners Street [email protected] Wellington 6142 www.gw.govt.nz T 04 384 5708 F 04 385 6960 Western Corridor Plan Strategic Context Corridor plans organise a multi-modal response across a range of responsible agencies to the meet pressures and issues facing the region’s land transport corridors over the next 10 years and beyond. The Western Corridor generally follows State Highway 1 from the regional border north of Ōtaki to Ngauranga and the North Island Main Trunk railway to Kaiwharawhara. The main east- west connections are State Highway 58 and the interchange for State Highways 1 and 2 at Ngauranga. Long-term vision This Corridor Plan has been developed to support and contribute to the Regional Land Transport Strategy (RLTS), which sets the objectives and desired outcomes for the region’s transport network. The long term vision in the RLTS for the Western Corridor is: Along the Western Corridor from Ngauranga to Traffic congestion on State Highway 1 will be Ōtaki, State Highway 1 and the North Island Main managed at levels that balance the need for access Trunk railway line will provide a high level of access against the ability to fully provide for peak demands and reliability for passengers and freight travelling due to community impacts and cost constraints. within and through the region in a way which Maximum use of the existing network will be achieved recognises the important strategic regional and by removal of key bottlenecks on the road and rail national role of this corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Plywood Cut-Outs Support Construction
    15 July, 2016 Plywood Cut-outs Support Construction Plywood construction worker cut-outs that have popped up in a paddock off State Highway 1 just north of Paekakariki have peaked commuter curiosity. They have appeared as part of early works to support construction of the Transmission Gully Motorway and generated a range of theories as to what they are there for. Project Director Boyd Knights sheds some light on the mystery by explaining that the cut-outs act as markers for vehicle operators working inside an area of sand dunes just south of Mackays Crossing. This ‘sand borrow pit’ is being excavated for use as fill for the future alignment of the new motorway. “Much like farmers use scarecrows to protect crops germinating below ground from birds flying overhead,” Boyd Knights says “the life-size plywood cut-outs alert operators to sensitive pieces of equipment which have been placed beneath the foundation treatment layer.” In this instance he says the cut-outs are protecting ‘settlement plates’ which are a critical monitoring and measuring tool supporting current activity known as ‘pre-loading’ which involves excavating sand from the borrow pit and laying it along the area in which the new motorway will be built. “Preloading is all about preparing the area for construction. It literally drains moisture from the soil below the new road embankment and compresses it, to ensure appropriate consolidation and compaction. The settlement plates allow us to measure this compression to ensure the ground has completely settled again prior to laying pavement to minimise any risk of movement or cracking of the new road surface”, Boyd Knights says.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry Into the Transmission Gully Proposal
    Final Report and Decision of the Board of Inquiry into the Transmission Gully Proposal Produced under Section 149R of the Resource Management Act 1991 Volume 1 Published by the Board of Inquiry into the Transmission Gully Proposal Publication No: EPA 0175 ISBN: 978-0-478-34877-4 (print) 978-0-478-34878-1 (electronic) 978-0-478-34879-8 (CD) June 2012 BEFORE THE BOARD OF INQUIRY CONCERNING REQUESTS FOR NOTICES OF REQUIREMENT AND APLICATIONS FOR RESOURCE CONSENTS TO ALLOW THE TRANSMISSION GULLY PROJECT IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the deliberations of a Board of Inquiry appointed under Section 149J of the Act to consider requests for notices of requirement and applications for resource consents by New Zealand Transport Agency, Porirua City Council and Transpower New Zealand Limited in respect of the Transmission Gully Project HEARING AT: Wellington commencing on 13 February 2012 and ending on 14 March 2012 REPRESENTATIONS: See Section 10 Board: Environment Judge Brian Dwyer (Chairperson) Environment Commissioner Russell Howie (Member) David McMahon (Member) David Mitchell (Member) Glenice Paine (Member) FINAL DECISION AND REPORT OF BOARD OF INQUIRY UNDER SECTION 149R OF THE ACT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 2. OUTLINE OF TGP PROPOSAL AND REASONS FOR IT ................................ 2 3. BACKGROUND, REFERENCE TO BOARD OF INQUIRY, AND MINISTER’S REASONS ................................................................................... 7 3.1 TGP PLAN CHANGE TO THE WELLINGTON REGIONAL FRESHWATER PLAN AND EXISTING DESIGNATION ............................................................ 10 4. CONDUCT OF THE INQUIRY AND MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED UNDER SECTION 149P OF THE RMA ........................................................... 12 5. MINUTES AND DIRECTIONS ISSUED ........................................................... 14 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Transmission Asset Management Plan 2013 – 2023
    Gas Transmission Asset Management Plan 2013 – 2023 Table of Contents (Note that each section is individually numbered) SECTION 1 Executive Summary SECTION 2 2. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................... 5 2.1 Context for Asset Management at Vector .................................................. 5 2.2 Planning Period and Approval ................................................................. 8 2.3 Purpose of the Plan ............................................................................... 9 2.4 Changing External Outlook ................................................................... 15 2.5 Asset Management in the Wider Vector Context – Internal Stakeholders ..... 16 2.6 Asset Management in the Wider Vector Context – External Stakeholders..... 19 2.7 Asset Management Structure and Responsibilities .................................... 23 2.8 AMP Approval Process ......................................................................... 28 2.9 Asset Management Decisions and Project Expenditure Approval ................. 30 2.10 Performance Reporting ........................................................................ 31 2.11 Asset Management Processes ............................................................... 31 2.12 Works Coordination ............................................................................. 33 2.13 Other Asset Management Documents and Policies ................................... 34 2.14 Review of Vector’s Asset Management Practice .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice: Transmission Gully Proposal
    PUBLIC NOTICE Transmission Gully Proposal Application for Notices of Requirement and Resource Consents In accordance with section 149C of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA), the EPA gives notice of the direction of the Hon Dr Nick Smith, Minister for the Environment (the Minister), to refer the matters lodged for the Transmission Gully Proposal (the proposal) to a board of inquiry. The New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA), Porirua City Council (PCC), and Transpower New Zealand Limited (Transpower) (the applicants) have lodged applications for notices of requirement and resource consents (collectively known as matters) with the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA1). In deciding whether the matters are a proposal, or part of a proposal, of national significance, the Minister had regard to relevant factors in section 142(3) of the RMA. In making his decision, the Minister also had regard to the views of the applicants (NZTA, PCC and Transpower), the relevant local authorities (Wellington Regional Council, Wellington City Council, Porirua City Council, Upper Hutt City Council and Kapiti Coast District Council), who consider that the proposal should be directed to a board of inquiry, and the EPA‟s recommendation that the matters be so directed. The Minister considers the matters, as set out below, are a proposal, or part of a proposal, of national significance for the reasons identified in the „Reasons for Direction‟ section below, and has directed that they be decided by a board of inquiry in accordance with Part 6AA of the RMA. Under Section 149R of the RMA, the board must make its decision on the matters and produce a final report not later than nine months after the date of public notification of the Minister‟s direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Gully Proposal: Comments on the Board’S Draft Report and Decision
    Transmission Gully Proposal: Comments on the Board’s draft report and decision. Party Draft Report Explanation Amendment sought Accepted/ Brief summary of Board’s reference reasons Refused NZTA / PCC Para [4], bullet The Draft Report describes the NZTA as the “national roading authority.” The That the BoI deletes reference to the NZTA as the “national roading authority” in paragraph [4] Refused Unnecessary point one NZTA considers that such a description could cause confusion as to the extent of the Draft Report and replace it with a reference to the NZTA being the “road controlling of the NZTA‟s statutory responsibilities. The NZTA is the body charged with authority responsible for the State highway network”. operating the State highway network under the Land Transport Management Act 2003. As the BoI is aware, other agencies, such as territorial authorities, manage other parts of the roading network. Coastal Accepted Amended Draft Report The Coastal Highway Group do not appear to be included in the list of parties who Highway Group Amendment to the Report to note the contribution made by the submitter as a party to the Hearing. Section 10 made submissions. Mr Jessup NZTA / PCC Para [10] The Draft Report incorrectly refers to the EPA as the “Environmental That paragraph [10] of the Draft Report be amended as follows: Accepted Correction Protection Agency.” The EPA‟s correct full title is the “Environmental Protection Authority.” “…were lodged with the Environmental Protection Agency Authority” NZTA / PCC Para [18], [57] The BoI records that section 149P of the RMA requires the BoI to consider any That the BoI amends its Draft Report to record the information provided to it by the EPA under Refused All information disclosed and information provided to it by the EPA under section 149G.
    [Show full text]
  • Pauatahanui Residents Association
    Pauatahanui Residents Association Minutes of the Management Committee meeting held at 325 Grays Road on Thursday 6 December 2012. 1.0 Apologies : Mike Conroy, Kay Middleton, Rob Foley John Mazenier. 2.0 Present:, Nicky Chapman [Acting Chair], Alan Gray [Secretary], Diane Strugnell [Treasurer] , Ken McAdam, & Anna Dellow. 3.0 Minutes: The minutes of the previous meeting of 25th October 2012 were approved. Moved: Diane; Seconded: Anna. 4.0 Business arising from the minutes. 4.1 Water & sewage (&Gas!) reticulation for Pauatahanui Village: Work on the proposed Water and Sewage Reticulation Scheme is still proceeding. PCC is in the process of completing a more detailed design scheme based on the number of properties who have expressed a desire to be connected. Knowing the final number of connections will help price the scheme more accurately. At this stage 7 properties that will not be charged include the school, preschool, public toilets, church, wildlife reserve and the three properties already connected to the mains sewage. .There is also an issue of easements on properties to be connected to allow servicing, but individual property owners will be contacted by PCC regarding this. Powerco/Gashub are said to be linking an existing terminal line at 209 Paekakariki Hill Rd, and bringing this down to the village and linking it up with the Whitby line in Joseph Banks Drive. So as well as sewage and water reticulation there could be mains gas available too to Village residents. Council's engineers are already investigating co-sharing installation of the 3 services, water, sewage & gas. For further information on water & sewage reticulation of the Village contact - Harriet Shelton at [email protected] 4.2 History Project: The NZ Lottery Grants Board has awarded a further $5,000 towards the publishing costs of the history book.
    [Show full text]
  • Turnaround Time
    Seaview/Gracefield... the heart of Wellington’s industrial sector. Regional vacancy edges down Wellington industrial vacancy rates are Wellington Industrial Vacancy Rate - All Precincts retreating from their 2012 peak, despite 8.00% the total inventory increasing. While the 7.00% Wellington economy has remained subdued over the last year, the overall vacancy rate 6.00% within key industrial precincts has fallen, 5.00% albeit by a relatively modest amount. 4.00% Bayleys Research’s latest Wellington Industrial Survey shows the total vacancy Vacancy Rate 3.00% rate across Seaview/Gracefield, Petone, 2.00% Grenada, Ngauranga and Miramar/ 1.00% Rongotai edged down to 7.2% from the 0.00% 2012 total of 7.5%. This broke a run of 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 six annual increases which more than July Source: Bayleys Research doubled the rate from a low of under 3% in 2006. The decline was the result of substantial falls within the Grenada Wellington Industrial Vacancy Rates By Precinct (July 2010 to July 2013 and Miramar/Rongotai precincts – which 14% previously had double digit vacancy rates 2010 2011 2012 2013 12% – offsetting small increases elsewhere. 10% While it experienced the most 8% significant increase in vacancy following the departure of a number of occupiers, 6% the biggest of which was Hot Chilly, Vacancy Rate 4% Ngauranga still has the region’s equal 2% 0% lowest vacancy rate, at 6.6%. Grenada Miramar & Ngauranga Petone Seaview Total Rongotai The precinct has now experienced Source: Bayleys Research vacancy rises in two consecutive surveys since bucking the overall trend in 2011 Ngauranga Investment Trends when it was the only one to register a Yield Forecast Demand Availability Land Value $/m2 decline in vacancy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transmission Gully Motorway Project: CPB HEB Joint Venture
    IECA AWARD FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE THE TRANSMISSION GULLY MOTORWAY PROJECT JUNE 2018 Index SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................ PROJECT OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................................... DISTINCTIVE FEATURES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS & CHALLENGES .............................................................. KEY BENEFITS .................................................................................................................................................. , AWL FACILITY | RFP | MAY 2018 i SUMMARY The NZ$850 million Transmission Gully project is being delivered as a Public Private Partnership (PPP) between New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) and the Wellington Gateway Partnership. A key part of the new Wellington Northern Corridor, the project is one of the most significant pieces of new road construction in the lower North Island. A key component of the project is the diversion of the Horokiri and Te Puka streams. Approximately 4.1km of stream is to be diverted into a pipe system, while bulk earthworks are undertaken to lift the streambed by up to 20m. The Transmission Gully team has implemented an innovative and environmentally responsible method to manage the challenges associated with constructing a 4-lane motorway through the middle of a valley containing streams with high ecological value. The project has utilised
    [Show full text]