A Sheffield Hallam University Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Sheffield Hallam University Thesis Exploring the potential of complexity theory in urban regeneration processes. MOOBELA, Cletus. Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/20078/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/20078/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. Fines are charged at 50p per hour JMUQ06 V-l 0 9 MAR ?R06 tjpnO - -a. t REFERENCE ProQuest Number: 10697385 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10697385 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Exploring the Potential of Complexity Theory in Urban Regeneration Processes Cletus Moobela A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The carrying out and completion of this research project was a stimulating experience for me in an area that I have come to develop an ever-increasing amount of personal interest. In the course of the execution of the project, I indubitably interacted with, and sought recourse to, many people’s time, material and connoisseur resources so much that I remain heavily indebted to all of them. I first and foremost would like to acknowledge and express my sincere gratitude to my Director of Studies, Professor llfryn Price, whose fathomless support during the time of my studies remains an unparalleled contribution. I would also like to thank the other members of my supervisory team - Mr. Steve Crocker, Professor Paul Syms, and Dr. Martin Loosemore - for their guidance, encouragement, and for providing the latitude that made it possible for me to chart an unequivocal focus for the study. I am also indebted to all the members of the Facilities Management Graduate Centre for providing the enabling environment for research students. I owe a debt of gratitude to Ms Barbara McLoughlin and her team at the Moss Side and Hulme (Regeneration) Partnership for “opening the gates” to the inner city area of Hulme and providing the much-needed data for the research. Similarly, I would like to thank all the community leaders and local authority officers in Hulme for giving me access to information with regard to their organisations. Sincere thanks to my wife Kalinda and our son Hachibi Kubantu who endured the innumerable hours and distractions which are inevitable in one’s pursuit of an academic endeavour of this enormity. I also thank my parents for being so inspirational, and brothers and sisters for their love and care. Thank you to a constellation of friends and relatives wherever they may be on the globe for the social networks of inestimable value that we shared together for common and individual benefits. Lastly, but by no means the least, I would like to express my thanks to the School of Environment and Development and the Facilities Management Graduate Centre at Sheffield Hallam University for co-sponsoring my studies. I also thank the Copperbelt University administration for granting the study leave I needed to pursue my studies. i Acknowledgements................................ ......................................................... i Table of contents .............................................................................................. ii List of figures .................................................................................................... v iii List of tables ..................................................................................................... x Abstract ............................................................................................................. xi Author’s declaration ....................................................................................... x iii Chapter One: Introduction ............................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................. ............ 1 1.2 Background: Origins of Britain’s urban problem ...................................... 2 1.3 Rationale for the research ........................................................................ 4 1.4 Introducing complexity theory ................................................................... 5 1.5 Research aim, objectives and hypothesis ....................................... 6 1.6 Research originality .................................................................................. 7 1.7 Research methodology ............................................................................. 8 1.8 Structure of the dissertation ..................................................................... 9 Chapter two: Epistemological Dimensions of Complexity Research 12 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 12 2.2 The complexity revolution ......................................................................... 12 2.2.1 Defining complexity theory ........................................................... 15 2.2.2 Characteristics of complex systems ............................................ 17 2.2.3 Life at the edge of chaos............................................................. 20 2.3 Early models of complexity ......................................... ............................. 21 2.3.1 John Holland’s Classifier Systems model ..................... 22 2.3.2 Stuart Kauffman’s NK Landscape model .................................... 22 2.3.3 John Von Neuman’s Cellular Automata ...................................... 24 2.4 Complexity and postmodernism ............................................................... 25 2.5 Complexity and connectionism ................................................................ 28 2.5.1 Language as a complex adaptive system .................................. 29 2.5.2 Connectionism in organisational settings ................................... 31 2.6 The realist account of complexity ............................................................ 33 ii 2.6.1 The demise of positivism ............................................................... 34 2.6.2 Kant’s transcendental idealism .................................................... 38 2.6.3 Roy Bhaskar’s transcendental realism ......................................... 40 2.7 Discussion: Realism in social complexity research.................................. 41 2.8 Conclusion ................................................................................................. 47 Chapter Three: Theoretical Foundations of Planning and Urban Change ............................................................................................................... 48 3.1 Introduction ................................................... 48 3.2 Approaches to urban planning ................................................................. 48 3.2.1 Pluralism ........................................................................................ 48 3.2.2 The power of public bureaucracy ................................................ 49 3.2.3 Reformism..................................................................................... 50 3.2.4 Marxism: The political economy of urbanism ........................... 50 3.3 Theories of planning and urban change .................................................. 51 3.3.1 The Garden City and the Radiant City ........................................ 52 3.3.2 von Thunen’s Isolated State ........................................................ 55 3.3.3 Location theory and spatial analysis .................. 57 3.3.4 Planning theory ............................................................................. 61 3.3.4 A systems view of planning ......................................................... 63 3.3.5 The concept and process of urban regeneration ....................... 65 3.4 Locating the planner’s dilemma .................................................. 68 3.5 The potential of self-organisation ............................................................ 70 3.6 Conclusion ...................................................................................... 71 Chapter Four: The Complexity of Urban Regeneration Initiatives in Britain ................................................................................................................. 73 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 73 4.2 Evolution of urban regeneration initiatives ............................................... 74 4.3 Early urban initiatives
Recommended publications
  • The Ruins of the British Welfare State Tahl Kaminer
    95 Review Article The Ruins of the British Welfare State Tahl Kaminer In Owen Hatherley’s tour of British cities, on which New buildings are built: cheap apartments, yet cool his recent book A Guide to the New Ruins of Great and smartly designed, tailored for the lower-middle Britain is based,1 the author reaches ex-steel city class, a social group with limited choice regard- Sheffield. Here he encounters the Mancunian urban ing the purchase of property. As Nick Johnson, the regeneration specialists, Urban Splash, presiding current deputy chief executive and previous devel- over a dubious project that perfectly embodies and opment director of Urban Splash, described it, the represents the aporia of recent urban development, new buildings express ‘a variety of architectural regeneration, and architecture in Britain and else- styles reflecting the city - a little bit messy here where: the regeneration of Park Hill, the notorious and there, because that’s what cities are like, not council housing slabs overlooking the city from their standardised - with lots of colourful structures and hill-top position, perched above Sheffield’s main water’.2 This is accompanied by an investment in railway station. culture, either by organizing street parties or other events, in order to transform the image of the area The process Hatherley unfolds is fascinating, but in question by infusing it with vitality and vibrancy. his analysis of the material he assembles is lacking. Once a substantial number of lower-class residents Architecturally, Park Hill’s regeneration destroys the have moved out, the lower-middle class moves in, ideas that animated the original architects, Jack and the image is improved through cultural content.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Directory. [Slater's
    2110 OFFICIAL DIRECTORY. [SLATER'S COU~CILLORS. WARD. COLLEGIATE CHURCH WARD. Hinchcliffe Thomas Henry. ••.•.••.• St. Luke's Alderman. BinchlifIe lsaac.•.•.•• ,.•.•...•.... St. John's I:John Royle, 36 Dantzio street Bodkin Henry ••••••••••••••••••.• Longsigllt Holden Wllliam.................. .• Hll.rpurhey Councillors. Howarth l}eorge ••••.•••••.•••...• N ew Cr(J~s !John Richard Smith, 27 ~hfield road, Urmston Howell Hiram .J:;;dward •••••..•.•.. ClteethRJn "Ernest Darker, 26 SW!ln street Hoyle Thomas ••.••..•...•..••.•.• St. Michael's tJohn J,owry, Whol8l;ale Fish market, HiJi(h street JackJlon William Turnt>r...... •••. .• Harpurhey CRUMPSALL WARD. J ennison Angelo. ••• .. ••••••.•••.•.• Longsight Alderm.an. JohDBon James ••••••• '...... .•••.• St. Luke's J ohnston J a.me8.. .• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• .• Blackley and Moston IIEdward Holt, Derby Brewery, Cheetham J Olles John ••••••.••••••.••••••• I• Longsight Councillors. Jone8 John T •.•.. "' .....••.•..•.• New Cross tHarold Wood, The Wichnors, t3ingleton road, KerBal Kay William •....... _........... .• St. Georgc's -Frederick Todd, Waterloo st. Lower Crumpsall Kemp Jamea Miles Platting tFrederick John Robertshaw, Ivy House, Kea.rsley rd. Ol"llmpaall Kendall John James................ Oheetham DIDSBURY WARD. Lane-Scott William Fitzmaurtce.... Rusholrne Langley J ames Birchby •• ..•..••• •• St. Clement's AlcUrman. LecomtJer William Godfrey ••••••.• Medlock Street 11 WaIter Edward Harwood, 78 CrOSl! street Litton John George •• •••• .• •. •• .• •• St. Ann's Oouncillorl. Lofts John Albert.................
    [Show full text]
  • 14-1676 Number One First Street
    Getting to Number One First Street St Peter’s Square Metrolink Stop T Northbound trams towards Manchester city centre, T S E E K R IL T Ashton-under-Lyne, Bury, Oldham and Rochdale S M Y O R K E Southbound trams towardsL Altrincham, East Didsbury, by public transport T D L E I A E S ST R T J M R T Eccles, Wythenshawe and Manchester Airport O E S R H E L A N T L G D A A Connections may be required P L T E O N N A Y L E S L T for further information visit www.tfgm.com S N R T E BO S O W S T E P E L T R M Additional bus services to destinations Deansgate-Castle field Metrolink Stop T A E T M N I W UL E E R N S BER E E E RY C G N THE AVENUE ST N C R T REE St Mary's N T N T TO T E O S throughout Greater Manchester are A Q A R E E S T P Post RC A K C G W Piccadilly Plaza M S 188 The W C U L E A I S Eastbound trams towards Manchester city centre, G B R N E R RA C N PARKER ST P A Manchester S ZE Office Church N D O C T T NN N I E available from Piccadilly Gardens U E O A Y H P R Y E SE E N O S College R N D T S I T WH N R S C E Ashton-under-Lyne, Bury, Oldham and Rochdale Y P T EP S A STR P U K T T S PEAK EET R Portico Library S C ET E E O E S T ONLY I F Alighting A R T HARDMAN QU LINCOLN SQ N & Gallery A ST R E D EE S Mercure D R ID N C SB T D Y stop only A E E WestboundS trams SQUAREtowards Altrincham, East Didsbury, STR R M EN Premier T EET E Oxford S Road Station E Hotel N T A R I L T E R HARD T E H O T L A MAN S E S T T NationalS ExpressT and otherA coach servicesO AT S Inn A T TRE WD ALBERT R B L G ET R S S H E T E L T Worsley – Eccles –
    [Show full text]
  • Hulme, Moss Side and Rusholme Neighbourhood Mosaic Profile
    Hulme, Moss Side and Rusholme Neighbourhood Mosaic Profile Summary • There are just over 21,300 households in the Hulme, Moss Side and Rusholme Neighbourhood. • The neighbourhood contains a range of different household types clustered within different parts of the area. Moss Side is dominated by relatively deprived, transient single people renting low cost accommodation whereas Hulme and Rusholme wards contain larger concentrations of relatively affluent young people and students. • Over 60% of households in Moss Side contain people whose social circumstances suggest that they may need high or very high levels of support to help them manage their own health and prevent them becoming high users of acute healthcare services in the future. However, the proportion of households in the other parts of the neighbourhood estimated to require this levels of support is much lower. This reflects the distribution of different types of household within the locality as described above. Introduction This profile provides more detailed information about the people who live in different parts of the neighbourhood. It draws heavily on the insights that can be gained from the Mosaic population segmentation tool. What is Mosaic? Mosaic is a population segmentation tool that uses a range of data and analytical methods to provide insights into the lifestyles and behaviours of the public in order to help make more informed decisions. Over 850 million pieces of information across 450 different types of data are condensed using the latest analytical techniques to identify 15 summary groups and 66 detailed types that are easy to interpret and understand. Mosaic’s consistent segmentation can also provide a ‘common currency’ across partners within the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal of the Luton Local Plan
    Sustainability Appraisal of the Luton Local Plan Sustainability Report on the Draft Local Plan Client: Luton Borough Council Report No.: UE-130 Draft Luton LP SA Report_7_140603 Version: 7 Status: Final Date: June 2014 Author: NP/SP Checked: SP Approved: NP Sustainability Report on the Draft Luton Local Plan June 2014 UE-130 Draft Luton LP SA Report_7_140603 Contents Non-Technical Summary i About Sustainability Appraisal i About Draft Luton Local Plan i Purpose and Context of the Sustainability Report i The Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Stage ii Appraisal of Strategic Alternatives ii Assessment of Alternative Options iii Likely Significant Effects of the Draft Local Plan iii Recommendations iii Monitoring iii Next Steps iv Consultation Arrangements iv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of this Report 1 1.2 The Luton Local Plan 1 1.3 The Study Area 2 1.4 The Wider Sub-region 5 1.5 Sustainable Development 6 2 Methodology 9 2.1 Integrated Sustainability Appraisal 9 2.2 Habitats Regulations Assessment 10 2.3 Stages of Sustainability Appraisal 10 2.4 Approach to the Assessment 10 2.5 Limitations to the Sustainability Appraisal 14 3 Scoping 17 3.1 Scoping Report 17 3.2 Scoping Consultation and Review 17 3.3 Policy, Plan and Programme Review 18 Sustainability Report on the Draft Luton Local Plan June 2014 UE-130 Draft Luton LP SA Report_7_140603 3.4 Gathering Baseline Data 18 3.5 Key Sustainability Issues 19 3.6 The Sustainability Appraisal Framework 19 4 Current and Future Characteristics of the Area and Existing Sustainability Issues 27 4.1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Las Unidades Vecinales De Arquitectura Moderna En Chile
    PATRIMONIO FRÁGIL: LAS UNIDADES VECINALES DE ARQUITECTURA MODERNA EN CHILE Rodrigo Gertosio Swanston, Arquitecto. Magíster en Hábitat Residencial Universidad de Chile, Miembro DOCOMOMO Chile. Resumen: En Chile desde el año 2009, existe una explosión de protecciones patrimoniales de barrios residenciales de gran escala utilizando la Ley de Monumentos Nacionales (ley 17.288) en la figura de la Zona Típica, impulsados por los mismos habitantes como reacción ante las presiones externas de grupos económicos y a los vaivenes en los instrumentos de planificación, quienes resignificando el concepto de patrimonio, han logrado proteger sus estilos de vida, su entorno y su arquitectura. En este contexto emergen 6 conjuntos residenciales de Arquitectura Moderna construidas por la antigua Corporación de la Vivienda (CORVI) en conjunto con diversas Cajas de Previsión hasta fines de la década de 1960. Sin embargo, nuestra Ley de Monumentos Nacionales actual no ofrece ni guía ningún tipo de estrategia patrimonial de gestión posterior a la declaratoria que permita una evolución del barrio coherente con los valores patrimoniales redactados inicialmente por las comunidades, por lo que posterior a la declaratoria de Zona Típica, comienzan a evidenciar una serie de efectos que no estaban contemplados por las comunidades al inicio del proceso de patrimonialización ni por la legislación nacional, producto que la actual Ley de Monumentos por sí sola no alcanza a proteger, lo que podría abrir un escenario de incerteza sobre el escenario de protección real de este tipo de conjuntos habitacionales en el tiempo. Para ilustrar este fenómeno se expondrán dos conjuntos habitacionales de tipología Unidad Vecinal ubicados en la comuna de Ñuñoa, Santiago de Chile, gestados por la antigua Corporación de la Vivienda (CORVI), y declarados Zona Típica (ZT) entre 2015 y 2017 por los colectivos vecinales: Villa Frei y Villa Olímpica.
    [Show full text]
  • Q05a 2011 Census Summary
    Ward Summary Factsheet: 2011 Census Q05a • The largest ward is Cheetham with 22,562 residents, smallest is Didsbury West with 12,455 • City Centre Ward has grown 156% since 2001 (highest) followed by Hulme (64%), Cheetham (49%), Ardwick (37%), Gorton South (34%), Ancoats and Clayton (33%), Bradford (29%) and Moss Side (27%). These wards account for over half the city’s growth • Miles Platting and Newton Heath’s population has decreased since 2001(-5%) as has Moston (-0.2%) • 81,000 (16%) Manchester residents arrived in the UK between 2001 and 2011, mostly settling in City Centre ward (33% of ward’s current population), its neighbouring wards and Longsight (30% of current population) • Chorlton Park’s population has grown by 26% but only 8% of its residents are immigrants • Gorton South’s population of children aged 0-4 has increased by 87% since 2001 (13% of ward population) followed by Cheetham (70%), Crumpsall (68%), Charlestown (66%) and Moss Side (60%) • Moss Side, Gorton South, Crumpsall and Cheetham have around 25% more 5-15 year olds than in 2001 whereas Miles Platting and Newton Heath, Woodhouse Park, Moston and Withington have around 20-25% fewer. City Centre continues to have very few children in this age group • 18-24 year olds increased by 288% in City Centre since 2001 adding 6,330 residents to the ward. Ardwick, Hulme, Ancoats and Clayton and Bradford have also grown substantially in this age group • Didsbury West has lost 18-24 aged population (-33%) since 2001, followed by Chorlton (-26%) • City Centre working age population has grown by 192% since 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Entre Lo Utópico Y Lo Distópico: La Reinterpretación Del Modernismo En La Arquitectura Brutalista Y El Postpunk Británico
    Entre lo utópico y lo distópico: la reinterpretación del modernismo en la arquitectura brutalista y el postpunk británico «And with cold steel, odour on their bodies made a move to connect / But I could only stare in disbelief as the crowds all left»1 Shadowplay, Joy Division (Unknown Pleasures, 1979) La arquitectura brutalista y el postpunk en el Reino Unido ejercen hoy una fascinación nostálgica de una época en la que el arte era todavía concebido como posibilitador de cambio social. Si bien ambas tendencias no coincidieron directamente en el tiempo -para finales de los setenta cuando surgió el postpunk, el brutalismo, en auge desde los cincuenta, estaba siendo progresivamente desplazado por aproximaciones más cercanas a la arquitectura posmoderna- está claro que la arquitectura brutalista determinó en gran medida la estética y discurso del postpunk. Más allá de ello, el postpunk y el brutalismo compartieron una serie de afinidades estéticas y contextuales, como pueden ser la reinterpretación del modernismo o la tensión entre lo útopico y lo distópico, que hacen necesario un análisis conjunto, ofreciéndonos a su vez un retrato de las pautas culturales de los setenta en el Reino Unido. La noción de brutalismo se popularizó a partir del artículo The New Brutalism (1955) del teórico de arquitectura Reyner Banham.2 Al parecer, dicha palabra fue empleada por primera vez en 1950 por el arquitecto sueco Hans Asplund, para describir el trabajo de los jóvenes arquitectos londinenses adscritos a la Architectural Asociation y la Architect’s Deparment
    [Show full text]
  • Development Control Date: 11Th January 2017 Subject: Former Vauxhall Motors Site, Kimpton Road
    AGENDA ITEM 7 COMMITTEE: DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DATE: 11TH JANUARY 2017 SUBJECT: FORMER VAUXHALL MOTORS SITE, KIMPTON ROAD – ERECTION OF 685 FLATS COMPRISED OF 424 ONE-BEDROOM AND 261 TWO-BEDROOM UNITS, RETAIL AND LEISURE (CLASS A1-A5/D2), HOTEL COMPRISING 209 BEDROOMS, CONFERENCING AND BANQUETING FACILITIES (CLASS C1), MEDICAL WELLBEING CENTRE (CLASS D1) TOGETHER WITH LANDSCAPING, CAR PARKING, NEW ACCESS AND ASSOCIATED WORKS. (APPLICANT: J2 GLOBAL CORPORATION LIMITED) (APPLICATION NO: 16/00900/FULEIA) REPORT BY: DEVELOPMENT CONTROL MANAGER CONTACT OFFICER: DAVID GAUNTLETT 546317 IMPLICATIONS: LEGAL COMMUNITY SAFETY EQUALITIES ENVIRONMENT FINANCIAL CONSULTATIONS STAFFING OTHER WARDS AFFECTED: CRAWLEY PURPOSE 1. To advise Members of a current application for full planning permission and to seek their decision. RECOMMENDATION(S) 2. Development Control Committee is recommended to:- (a) Resolve that:- (01) The requirements of Part II of Schedule 4 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2015 (as amended) are satisfied by reason of the Environmental Statement including at least the following information: (i) A description of the development comprising information on the site, design and size of the development; (ii) A description of the measures envisaged in order to avoid, reduce and, if possible, remedy significant adverse effects; (iii) The data required to identify and assess the main effects which the development is likely to have on the environment; (iv) An outline of the main alternatives studied by the applicant or appellant and an indication of the main reasons for the choice made, taking into account the environmental effects; (v) A non-technical summary of the information provided under paragraphs i) to iv) above.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Greater Manchester
    Exploring Greater Manchester a fieldwork guide Web edition edited by Paul Hindle Original printed edition (1998) edited by Ann Gardiner, Paul Hindle, John McKendrick and Chris Perkins Exploring Greater Manchester 5 5. Urban floodplains and slopes: the human impact on the environment in the built-up area Ian Douglas University of Manchester [email protected] A. The River Mersey STOP 1: Millgate Lane, Didsbury The urban development of Manchester has modified From East Didsbury station and the junction of the A34 runoff to rivers (see Figure 1), producing changes in and A5145, proceed south along Parrs Wood Road and into flood behaviour, which have required expensive remedial Millgate Lane, Stop at the bridge over the floodbasin inlet measures, particularly, the embankment of the Mersey from channel at Grid Reference (GR) 844896 (a car can be turned Stockport to Ashton weir near Urmston. In this embanked round at the playing fields car park further on). Looking reach, runoff from the urban areas includes natural channels, south from here the inlet channel from the banks of the storm drains and overflows from combined sewers. Mersey can be seen. At flood times the gates of the weir on Alternative temporary storages for floodwaters involve the Mersey embankment can be opened to release water into release of waters to floodplain areas as in the Didsbury flood the Didsbury flood basin that lies to the north. Here, and at basin and flood storage of water in Sale and Chorlton water other sites along the Mersey, evidence of multi-purpose use parks. This excursion examines the reach of the Mersey from of the floodplain, for recreation and wildlife conservation as Didsbury to Urmston.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses Serving North Manchester General Hospital
    Buses serving North Manchester General Hospital 52 Salford Shopping City, Broughton, Cheetham Hill, NMGH, Harpurhey, Moston, Newton Heath, Failsworth Tesco Bus Stops Daily service, operated by First Greater Manchester A,C, Pendleton Higher Broughton Cheetham Hill NMG Moston Newton Heath Brookdale Failsworth D,E,F Salford Shopping City McDonalds Crescent Road Hospital Ben Brierley Dean Lane Park Tesco Store 27 16 7 12 21 26 32 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 53 Cheetham Hill, NMGH, Harpurhey, Miles Platting, SportCity, Gorton, Belle Vue, Longsight, Rusholme, Central Manchester Bus Stops Hospitals, Hulme, Old Trafford A,C, Daily service, operated by First Greater Manchester D,E,F Cheetham Hill NMG Harpurhey Sport Gorton Belle Rusholme University Old Trafford Salford Crescent Road Hospital Rochdale Rd City Vue of Manchester Trafford Bar Shopping City 7 7 16 31 35 50 58 68 80 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 88=> Circulars, Manchester City Centre, Monsall, Moston, White Moss, Blackley, NMGH, Cheetham Hill, Manchester City Centre 89<= Daily service, operated by First Greater Manchester (Evenings, Sundays and Bank Holidays—JPT) Use these buses and change at Crumpsall Metrolink Station or Cheetham Hill, Cheetham Hill Rd (Bus 135) for Bury. Bus Stops Manchester Central Moston White Blackley Bank Crumpsall NMG Cheetham Manchester
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester City Centre Third Edition 1:3,500
    Manchester City Centre Third Edition 1:3,500 830 A 831 B 832 C 833 D 834 E 835 F 836 G 837 H 838 J 839 K 840 L 841 M 842 N 843 P 844 Q 845 R 846 S 847 T 848 U 849 V 850 990 VICTORIA STATION APPROACH ANGEL 990 Westminster CANNON Renault FB Arena Point Car Park GMC Fire Service Royal Mail G R Cornerhouse A665 Miller Street LUDGATE B E N D I X S T R E E T E ROLLA ST House Victoria Victoria STREET E Garage Leisuredrive Smithfield Sorting Office B6184 Hotel Car Park T H O M P S O N Training Centre N Eagle MEN Arena Cravans Arena Service Station Braziers Aldridge Inn PCS Station Car Park New Century PH G O U L D E N S T R E E T DRIVE M I L L E R S T R E E T DYCHE STREET Wing Yip Dunlop DAWSON STREET Car Park STREET S T R E E T Thompson Street PH Locksmith NEW MIRABEL STREET W.H.Smith House (Co-op) Beer House A6042 BRIDGEGREENGATE STREET Car Park HODSON ST Greengate Venus MILLGATE Fire Station 1 HUNT'S BANK Ladies Old Bank KENWRIGHT County 1 Cannon Green Court Clothing STREET M A R S H ARecord L L WELLINGTON Samuel Building MAYES STREET COLLIER STREET Crowther CAYGILL STREET Trident STREETOffice STREET WEST KING STREET Greengate WALKER'S Burns Q U E E N BOOND S STREET T R E E T CWS Car Stephen AC LONG Smithfield Car Park Upton Medical House House Dolby LA N E CROFT Redfern Park Project C L O S E B L A C K Autobody HANOVERCentre S S I D Y Hotel Snippers Gents Building ROCHDALE ROAD A Wing Yip Black Friar Car Park C A62 Stuart Repairs Club Addington HATTER PH DUKE STREET A D D I N G T O N Chinese Supermarket 989 House Library REDFERNHolyoake STREET
    [Show full text]