DOCSLIB.ORG

First Nation and Metis Engagement Process

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
First Nation and Metis Engagement Process MANITOBA – MINNESOTA TRANSMISSION PROJECT Environmental Impact Statement CHAPTER 4 FIRST NATION AND SEPTEMBER 2015 METIS ENGAGEMENT PROCESS MANITOBA – MINNESOTA TRANSMISSION PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 4: FIRST NATION AND METIS ENGAGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 4 FIRST NATION AND METIS ENGAGEMENT ..................................... 4-1 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Lessons Learned from Previous Assessments .......................... 4-3 4.3 Design and Scope of the Engagement Process ......................... 4-4 4.3.1 Identification of First Nations, Metis and Aboriginal Organizations... 4-7 4.3.2 Methods of Engagement .................................................................... 4-8 4.3.2.1 Leadership Meetings .......................................................... 4-8 4.3.2.2 Community Open Houses/Information Sessions ............... 4-8 4.3.2.3 Telephone Calls .................................................................. 4-9 4.3.2.4 Community Coordinators .................................................... 4-9 4.3.2.5 ATK Studies ........................................................................ 4-9 4.3.2.6 Routing Workshops .......................................................... 4-10 4.3.2.7 Stakeholder Workshop ..................................................... 4-10 4.3.2.8 Project Site Tours and Tours of Similar Projects ............. 4-11 4.3.2.9 Reviewing and Confirming Information ............................ 4-11 4.3.2.10 Templates, Checklists and Work Plans ........................... 4-12 4.4 How Did We Share Information with First Nations, Metis and Aboriginal Organizations? ........................................................ 4-13 4.4.1 Letters ............................................................................................... 4-13 4.4.2 Handouts and Comment Sheets ...................................................... 4-13 4.4.2.1 MMTP Specific .................................................................. 4-14 4.4.2.2 General Information .......................................................... 4-15 4.4.2.3 Environmental Assessment Information Sheets .............. 4-16 4.4.2.4 Information on Manitoba Hydro Career Opportunities..... 4-17 4.4.3 Advertisement in Local Newspapers ................................................ 4-17 4.4.4 Project Posters.................................................................................. 4-18 4.4.5 Local Radio Spots (Peguis Radio Station and NCI) ........................ 4-18 September 2015 4-i MANITOBA – MINNESOTA TRANSMISSION PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 4: FIRST NATION AND METIS ENGAGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.4.6 Project Web Page ............................................................................. 4-18 4.4.7 Plain Language EIS Summary ......................................................... 4-18 4.5 What We Heard and How It Influenced the Project .................. 4-19 4.5.1 FNMEP Influence on the Project ...................................................... 4-19 4.5.2 FNMEP Influence on Routing ........................................................... 4-19 4.5.3 ATKS Management Team (Swan Lake First Nation, Long Plain First Nation and Black River First Nation) ........................................ 4-21 4.5.3.1 Engagement Process ....................................................... 4-21 4.5.3.2 ATKS Management Team Key Feedback ....................... 4-23 4.5.3.3 Route Preferences ............................................................ 4-25 4.5.3.4 How the ATKS Management Team’s Feedback and Concerns Influenced the Project ...................................... 4-26 4.5.4 Black River First Nation .................................................................... 4-26 4.5.4.1 Engagement Process ....................................................... 4-26 4.5.4.2 Black River First Nation Key Feedback ........................... 4-27 4.5.4.3 How Black River First Nation’s Feedback and Concerns Influenced the Project ...................................... 4-27 4.5.5 Long Plain First Nation ..................................................................... 4-27 4.5.5.1 Engagement Process ....................................................... 4-28 4.5.5.2 Long Plain First Nation Key Feedback ............................. 4-29 4.5.5.3 How Long Plain First Nation’s Feedback and Concerns Influenced the Project ....................................................... 4-31 4.5.5.4 Long Plain First Nation Non-Project Specific Related Concerns and Feedback .................................................. 4-32 4.5.6 Swan Lake First Nation .................................................................... 4-32 4.5.6.1 Engagement Process ....................................................... 4-32 4.5.6.2 Swan Lake First Nation Key Feedback ............................ 4-33 4.5.6.3 How Swan Lake First Nation’s Feedback and Concerns Influenced the Project ...................................... 4-34 4.5.7 Buffalo Point First Nation .................................................................. 4-34 4.5.7.1 Engagement Process ....................................................... 4-35 4.5.8 Brokenhead Ojibway Nation ............................................................. 4-35 4.5.8.1 Engagement Process ....................................................... 4-35 4-ii September 2015 MANITOBA – MINNESOTA TRANSMISSION PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 4: FIRST NATION AND METIS ENGAGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.5.8.2 Brokenhead Ojibway Nation Key Feedback .................... 4-36 4.5.8.3 Brokenhead Ojibway Nation Non-Project Specific Related Concerns and Feedback ..................................... 4-36 4.5.9 Dakota Plains Wahpeton First Nation .............................................. 4-36 4.5.10 Engagement Process ....................................................................... 4-37 4.5.11 Dakota Plains Wahpeton First Nation Key Feedback ..................... 4-38 4.5.11.1 How the Dakota Plains Wahpeton First Nation’s Feedback and Concerns Influenced the Project .............. 4-39 4.5.11.2 Dakota Plains Wahpeton First Nation Non-Project Specific Related Concerns and Feedback ....................... 4-39 4.5.12 Dakota Tipi First Nation .................................................................... 4-39 4.5.12.1 Engagement Process ....................................................... 4-40 4.5.12.2 Key Feedback ................................................................... 4-40 4.5.12.3 How the Dakota Tipi First Nation’s Feedback and Concerns Influenced the Project ...................................... 4-41 4.5.13 Peguis First Nation ........................................................................... 4-41 4.5.13.1 Engagement Process ....................................................... 4-42 4.5.13.2 Key Feedback ................................................................... 4-42 4.5.13.3 Route Preference .............................................................. 4-44 4.5.13.4 How Peguis First Nation’s Feedback and Concerns Influenced the Project ....................................................... 4-44 4.5.14 Roseau River Anishinabe First Nation ............................................. 4-45 4.5.15 Engagement Process ....................................................................... 4-45 4.5.15.1 Key Feedback ................................................................... 4-46 4.5.15.2 Route Preferences ............................................................ 4-47 4.5.15.3 How Roseau River Anishinabe First Nation’s Feedback and Concerns Influenced the Project ............................... 4-48 4.5.15.4 Route Preference .............................................................. 4-49 4.5.15.5 Roseau River Anishinabe First Nation Non-Project Specific Related Concerns and Feedback ....................... 4-49 4.5.16 Sagkeeng First Nation ...................................................................... 4-49 4.5.16.1 Engagement Process ....................................................... 4-49 4.5.17 Key Feedback ................................................................................... 4-50 September 2015 4-iii MANITOBA – MINNESOTA TRANSMISSION PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 4: FIRST NATION AND METIS ENGAGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.5.17.1 How Sagkeeng First Nation’s Feedback and Concerns Influenced the Project ....................................................... 4-51 4.5.18 Sandy Bay Ojibway First Nation ....................................................... 4-52 4.5.18.1 Engagement Process ....................................................... 4-52 4.5.19 Manitoba Metis Federation ............................................................... 4-52 4.5.19.1 Engagement Process ....................................................... 4-52 4.5.20 Aboriginal Chamber of Commerce ................................................... 4-53 4.5.21 Southern Chiefs Organization .......................................................... 4-53 4.5.22 Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs ........................................................... 4-53 4.5.23 Dakota Ojibway Tribal Council ......................................................... 4-54 4.6 Ongoing Engagement .............................................................. 4-54 4.6.1 Regulatory Process .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Needs Assessment
    NEEDS ASSESSMENT 105-1555 St. James Street p. (204) 946-1869 [email protected] Winnipeg, Manitoba f. (204) 946-1871 www.scoinc.mb.ca R3H1B5 2 Table of Contents Southern Chiefs’ Organization Mandate and Member First Nations………………………….3 Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………………5 Background………………………………………………………………………………………………6 Needs Assessment Goal and Objectives…………………………………………………………..7 A Socio-Ecological Approach to Violence Prevention………………………………………….8 A Brief Socio-Ecological Analysis of Violence Against Indigenous Women and Girls…..11 Literature Review………………………………………………………………………………………13 Methods…………………………………………………………………………………………………18 Results…………………………………………………………………………………………………....22 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………………………….…43 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………..…….46 References………………………………………..…………………………………………………….47 Appendix A: Data Collection Tools……………………………………………...…………………51 Appendix B: Partners………………………………………………………...………………………..67 Authors: Tessa Jourdain, Master of Public Health (Health Promotion) Candidate, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto Shauna Fontaine, Violence Prevention and Safety Coordinator, Southern Chiefs’ Organization 3 Southern Chiefs’ Organization Mandate Established in 1998, the Mandate of the Southern Chiefs Organization (SCO) is to protect, preserve, promote and enhance First Nation peoples’ inherent rights, languages, customs and traditions through the application and implementation of the spirit and intent
    [Show full text]
  • Since 1985, Stars Has Flown More Than 45,000 Missions Across Western Canada
    2019/20 Missions SINCE 1985, STARS HAS FLOWN MORE THAN 45,000 MISSIONS ACROSS WESTERN CANADA. Below are 760 STARS missions carried out during 2019/20 from our base in Winnipeg. MANITOBA 760 Alonsa 2 Altona 14 Amaranth 2 Anola 2 Arborg 4 Ashern 15 Austin 2 Bacon Ridge 2 Balsam Harbour 1 Beausejour 14 Benito 1 Beulah 1 Birds Hill 2 Black River First Nation 2 Bloodvein First Nation 6 Blumenort 1 Boissevain 3 Bowsman 1 Brandon 16 Brereton Lake 3 Brokenhead Ojibway Nation 1 Brunkild 2 Caddy Lake 1 Carberry 1 Carman 4 Cartwright 1 Clandeboye 1 Cracknell 1 Crane River 1 Crystal City 6 Dacotah 3 Dakota Plains First Nation 1 Dauphin 23 Dog Creek 4 Douglas 1 Dufresne 2 East Selkirk 1 Ebb and Flow First Nation 2 Edrans 1 Elphinstone 1 Eriksdale 9 Fairford 2 Falcon Lake 1 Fannystelle 1 Fisher Branch 1 Fisher River Cree Nation 4 Fort Alexander 3 Fortier 1 Foxwarren 1 Fraserwood 2 Garson 1 Gilbert Plains 1 Gimli 15 Giroux 1 Gladstone 1 Glenboro 2 Grand Marais 2 Grandview 1 Grosse Isle 1 Grunthal 5 Gypsumville 3 Hadashville 3 Hartney 1 Hazelridge 1 Headingley 5 Hilbre 1 Hodgson 21 Hollow Water First Nation 3 Ile des Chênes 3 Jackhead 1 Keeseekoowenin Ojibway First Nation 1 Kelwood 1 Kenton 1 Killarney 8 Kirkness 1 Kleefeld 1 La Rivière 1 La Salle 1 Lac du Bonnet 3 Landmark 3 Langruth 1 Lenore 1 Libau 1 Little Grand Rapids 3 Little Saskatchewan First Nation 7 Lockport 2 Long Plain First Nation 5 Lorette 3 Lowe Farm 1 Lundar 3 MacGregor 1 Manigotagan 2 Manitou 3 Marchand 2 Mariapolis 1 McCreary 1 Middlebro 5 Milner Ridge 2 Minnedosa 4 Minto 1 Mitchell
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Statement
    MISSION STATEMENT SHAWENIM ABINOOJII HONOURS THE SACRED DUTY TO LOVE, PROTECT, AND NURTURE THE CHILDREN IN ITS CARE BY PROVIDING UNIQUE AND NEEDED SERVICES AND PROGRAMS THAT AIM TO FULFILL THE NEEDS OF THE CHILD, FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY. SHAWENIM ABINOOJII MANDATE • SAI mandate has grown to respond to child, family and community needs - To provide holistic care for those in need by creating and/or providing culturally relevant experiences, education and training, and support and placement services for the purpose of promoting and supporting self- sufficiency and wellness SOUTHEAST CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES SOUTHEAST CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES SUPPORT THE CHILDREN, FAMILIES, AND COMMUNITIES WITH PROVIDING RESPECTFUL AND CARING SUPPORTIVE, PREVENTATIVE, AND PROTECTION SERVICES THAT INCORPORATES A REVITALIZATION OF THE ANISHINAABE SYSTEM OF CARE THAT IS ROOTED IN THE CUSTOMS, TRADITIONS, AND VALUES OF THE COMMUNITIES WE SERVE. SECFS VISION - MINO PIMATIZIWIN Leading a good life • Brokenhead Ojibway Nation • Black River First Nation • Hollow Water First Nation • Poplar River First Nation • Little Grand Rapids First Nation • Pauingassi First Nation • Berens River First Nation • Bloodvein First Nation • Buffalo Point (served by Animikii Ozoson CFS) COMMUNITIES WE SERVE Bloodvein First Nation ABOUT SECFS • One of the largest First Nation CFS agencies • 1,291 children in care as of October 31, 2019 (108) • Believed to be the agency with the highest child in care per capita in Canada ABOUT SECFS • 5 First Nations have year round road access • 3 First
    [Show full text]
  • Manitoba Regional Health Authority (RHA) DISTRICTS MCHP Area Definitions for the Period 2002 to 2012
    Manitoba Regional Health Authority (RHA) DISTRICTS MCHP Area Definitions for the period 2002 to 2012 The following list identifies the RHAs and RHA Districts in Manitoba between the period 2002 and 2012. The 11 RHAs are listed using major headings with numbers and include the MCHP - Manitoba Health codes that identify them. RHA Districts are listed under the RHA heading and include the Municipal codes that identify them. Changes / modifications to these definitions and the use of postal codes in definitions are noted where relevant. 1. CENTRAL (A - 40) Note: In the fall of 2002, Central changed their districts, going from 8 to 9 districts. The changes are noted below, beside the appropriate district area. Seven Regions (A1S) (* 2002 changed code from A8 to A1S *) '063' - Lakeview RM '166' - Westbourne RM '167' - Gladstone Town '206' - Alonsa RM 'A18' - Sandy Bay FN Cartier/SFX (A1C) (* 2002 changed name from MacDonald/Cartier, and code from A4 to A1C *) '021' - Cartier RM '321' - Headingley RM '127' - St. Francois Xavier RM Portage (A1P) (* 2002 changed code from A7 to A1P *) '090' - Macgregor Village '089' - North Norfolk RM (* 2002 added area from Seven Regions district *) '098' - Portage La Prairie RM '099' - Portage La Prairie City 'A33' - Dakota Tipi FN 'A05' - Dakota Plains FN 'A04' - Long Plain FN Carman (A2C) (* 2002 changed code from A2 to A2C *) '034' - Carman Town '033' - Dufferin RM '053' - Grey RM '112' - Roland RM '195' - St. Claude Village '158' - Thompson RM 1 Manitoba Regional Health Authority (RHA) DISTRICTS MCHP Area
    [Show full text]
  • CTI / RHA Community/Region Index Jan-19
    CTI / RHA Community/Region Index Jan-19 Location CTI Region Health Authority A Aghaming North Eastman Interlake-Eastern Health Akudik Churchill WRHA Albert North Eastman Interlake-Eastern Health Albert Beach North Eastman Interlake-Eastern Health Alexander Brandon Prairie Mountain Health Alfretta (see Hamiota) Assiniboine North Prairie Mountain Health Algar Assiniboine South Prairie Mountain Health Alpha Central Southern Health Allegra North Eastman Interlake-Eastern Health Almdal's Cove Interlake Interlake-Eastern Health Alonsa Central Southern Health Alpine Parkland Prairie Mountain Health Altamont Central Southern Health Albergthal Central Southern Health Altona Central Southern Health Amanda North Eastman Interlake-Eastern Health Amaranth Central Southern Health Ambroise Station Central Southern Health Ameer Assiniboine North Prairie Mountain Health Amery Burntwood Northern Health Anama Bay Interlake Interlake-Eastern Health Angusville Assiniboine North Prairie Mountain Health Anola North Eastman Interlake-Eastern Health Arbakka South Eastman Southern Health Arbor Island (see Morton) Assiniboine South Prairie Mountain Health Arborg Interlake Interlake-Eastern Health Arden Assiniboine North Prairie Mountain Health Argue Assiniboine South Prairie Mountain Health Argyle Interlake Interlake-Eastern Health Arizona Central Southern Health Amaud South Eastman Southern Health Ames Interlake Interlake-Eastern Health Amot Burntwood Northern Health Anola North Eastman Interlake-Eastern Health Arona Central Southern Health Arrow River Assiniboine
    [Show full text]
  • Sagkeeng First Nation: Developmental Impacts and the Perception of Environmental Health Risks©
    Sagkeeng First Nation: Developmental Impacts and the Perception of Environmental Health Risks© by Brenda Elias John D. O’Neil Annalee Yassi Benita Cohen Department of Community Health Sciences University of Manitoba For additional copies of this report please contact CAHR office at 204-789-3250 April 1997 SAGKEENG FIRST NATION: DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS AND THE PERCEPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RISKS FINAL REPORT BRENDA ELIAS JOHN O’NEIL ANNALEE YASSI BENITA COHEN University of Manitoba Northern Health Research Unit Occupational and Environmental Health Unit Department of Community Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine (c) April 1997 Funding provided by the National Health Research and Development Program NHRDP Project No. 6607-1620-63 1 1.0 Introduction In 1988, a critical assessment was conducted on how governments and industry address potential health impacts of industrial developments in northern regions of Canada. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council (CEARC) held several regional workshops across Canada to foster discussion on northern and Aboriginal understandings of environmental health issues. Many broad recommendations emerged: ∗ the health of a community should be understood before a development project is underway; ∗ the impacts of an existing industrial site on a community over time should be understood by actually studying whether there is industry-related diseases (such as cancer or lung problems) developing in that community; ∗ a communication approach that provides scientific information on contaminants to northern communities should be developed; ∗ a constructive and respectful way of understanding what northerners consider to be a danger to their health should be developed. This study is a critical response to these recommendations. It examines the cultural basis of risk perception and the importance of local knowledge in changing the assessment and management of health risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolutions Update Report for 2012 Aga Resolutions
    ASSEMBLY OF FIRST NATIONS RESOLUTIONS UPDATE REPORT FOR 2012 AGA RESOLUTIONS Chief Garrison Settee, 1 Missing and Murdered Indigenous Chief Perry Bellegarde, Pimicikamak Okimawin, Women and Girls, 2012 Cross Lake, MB Little Black Bear First Nation, SK THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Chiefs-in-Assembly: 1. Make a personal and public declaration to take full responsibility to be violence free and commit to taking all actions available to them to uphold and ensure the rights of Indigenous women and girls. 2. Affirm: a. that further to Resolution 61/2010, the AFN call upon Canada to jointly establish an independent, public commission into missing and murdered Indigenous women in Canada. b. that further to Resolution 02/2011, the AFN call upon Canada to convene a Royal Commission on Violence against Indigenous Girls and Women to make concrete and specific recommendations to end violence against Indigenous girls and women at a national level. c. the direction for the AFN to demand that the Government of Canada support community based- initiatives and national programs that seek to promote public awareness and carry out advocacy and research about violence against Indigenous women; restore funding to the Native Women’s Association of Canada (NWAC) for maintenance of a national database on missing and murdered Indigenous women; and, ensure proper facilities and services are available within communities for those whom are victims or have lost their loved ones through acts of violence. d. the direction to the AFN and the National Chief to strongly advocate for the full protection and safety of First Nations women across Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009–2010
    Manitoba Culture, Heritage and Tourism Annual Report 2009–2010 His Honour the Honourable Philip S. Lee, C.M., O.M. Lieutenant-Governor of Manitoba Room 235, Legislative Building Winnipeg, MB R3C 0V8 May It Please Your Honour: I have the privilege of presenting for the information of your honour the Annual Report of Manitoba Culture, Heritage and Tourism for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2010. Respectfully submitted, "Original Signed By Flor Marcelino" Honourable Flor Marcelino Minister of Culture, Heritage and Tourism Deputy Minister’s Office Room 112 Legislative Building Winnipeg MB R3C 0V8 T 204-945-3794 F 204-948-3102 www.manitoba.ca/chc/ Honourable Flor Marcelino Minister of Culture, Heritage and Tourism Dear Minister Marcelino: I hav e t he hon our of s ubmitting f or y our ap proval t he 200 9–2010 Annual R eport f or Mani toba C ulture, Heritage and Tourism. The department had lead responsibility for Manitoba’s participation in the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games in Vancouver. Staff oversaw the development, construction and operation of the award-winning Manitoba pavilion (CentrePlace) that drew 120,000 people. Manitoba’s partnership exhibit with the Canadian Museum for Human Rights generated substantial awareness for the Museum. Other Olympics initiatives s upported b y t he department i ncluded t he O lympic T orch R elay t hrough 33 c ommunities, representation of Manitoba artists in the Cultural Olympiad, Place de la Francophonie, the Manitoba Day Victory Celebration concert, and the Aboriginal Youth Gathering. In January, the year-long Man itoba Homecoming 2010 initiative was launched, inviting Man itobans and former Manitobans to celebrate all the great events, activities and attractions our province has to offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Housing Program
    Achieving the Right Balance CANDO’s 24th Annual Conference – October 23, 2017 Fredericton, New Brunswick 1 The Fund’s Vision Every First Nation family has the opportunity to have a home on their own land in a strong community. 2 ©2008 FNMHF 3 ©2008 FNMHF # of First Nation Applications Received by the Fund / Total # of FNs in each Prov./ Territories (as of September 30, 2017) 9/14 2/33 84/202 18/47 16/63 13/75 13/40 65/134 12/35 ©2008 FNMHF First Nations announced for Credit Enhancement as of October 5, 2017 • Miawpukek, NF •Siksika, AB •Neskonlith, BC •Penelakut, BC • Membertou, NS • T’it’q’et, BC • Nipissing, ON • Nooaitch, BC • Lac La Ronge, SK • Eastmain, QC • Mississauga, ON • Skeetchestn, BC • Batchewana, ON • Tsawout, BC • Wemindji, QC • Kwanlin Dün, YT • Onion Lake, SK • Sagamok, ON • Henvey Inlet, ON • Sechelt, BC • Atikameksheng, ON • Seabird Island, BC • Beausoleil, ON •Teslin Tlingit Council, YT Anishnawbek, ON • Tk’emlups, BC • Wahnapitae, ON • Tsartlip First Nation, BC • Whitefish River, ON • Moose Cree, ON • Temagami, ON • Tr'ondëk Hwëch'in, YT • Champagne & • Serpent River, ON • Carcross/Tagish, YT Aishihik, YT • Curve Lake, ON • Penticton, BC • Skidegate, BC • Pic River, ON • Mohawks of the Bay • Aundeck Omni • Quatsino, BC • Lac Seul, ON of Quinte, ON Kaning, ON • Little Shuswap ,BC • Waswanipi, QC • Adams Lake, BC • Long Plain, MB • Mistissini, QC • Flying Dust, SK • Garden River, ON • Skwah, BC •Saugeen, ON • Okanagan, BC • Lower Nicola, BC • Fisher River, MB •Wahta, ON • Chisasibi, QC • Upper Nicola, BC •Alderville, ON •Mattagami, ON • Chippewas of • Hiawatha, ON • Lake Cowichan, BC •Chapleau Cree, ON Nawash, ON • M’Chigeeng, ON •Leq’á:mél, BC •Nuxalk, BC • Simpcw, BC • ʔaq'am (St.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 3 MANITOBA FIRST NATIONS POLICE SERVICE
    MANITOBA FIRST NATIONS POLICE SERVICE (DAKOTA OJIBWAY POLICE SERVICE) History The original establishment of the Dakota Ojibway Tribal Council Police Department, now known as the Dakota Ojibway Police Service, dated December 1974, was prepared and agreed to by all Chiefs of the D.O.T.C. After three years of negotiations, funding was approved by the different levels of government. In November of 1977, the police department commenced operations with one Chief of Police and nine members. The program was funded by Indian & Northern Affairs Canada from 1977 to 1993. The development of the Police Service was to establish local control and accountability to the First Nation communities. In November of 1993, the Police Service ceased operations due to a lack of funding commitment from the Province of Manitoba. Tripartite negotiations reconvened in 1994 and technical meetings took place as follows: March 10, May 12, May 26 and June 23, 1994. On May 19, 1994, the D.O.T.C. Council of Chiefs and representatives from both levels of Government, Manitoba Justice and Public Safety Canada were able to secure an Interim Policing Service Agreement which saw the restoration of joining policing services (D.O.P.S./R.C.M.P.) to (7) seven of the (8) eight D.O.T.C. Member First Nation communities, with the effective start date of June 1, 1994. On December 31, 1994, a long-term Tripartite Agreement was finalized and on February 1, 1995, the Dakota Ojibway Police Service resumed full-time policing services to (6) six D.O.T.C. First Nation communities: Birdtail Sioux First Nation, Dakota Plains Wahpeton Nation, Long Plain First Nation, Canupawakpa Dakota Nation, Roseau River Anishinabe First Nation and Sioux Valley Dakota Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Indicators of Population Health and Health Care Use for Manitoba’S Regional Health Authorities
    Comparative Indicators of Population Health and Health Care Use for Manitoba’s Regional Health Authorities A POPULIS Project June 1999 Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation Department of Community Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba Charlyn Black, MD, ScD Noralou P Roos, PhD Randy Fransoo, MSc Patricia Martens, PhD ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of the many individuals whose efforts and expertise made it possible to produce this report, especially Jan Roberts and Carolyn DeCoster for their consultations and advice throughout the project. We also wish to express our appreciation to the many individuals who provided feedback on draft versions, including John Millar and Fred Toll, and those who provided insights into the data interpretation, including Donna Turner and Bob Tate. Because of the extensive nature of this report, we gratefully acknowledge many persons for their technical support: Shelley Derksen, David Friesen, Pat Nicol, Dawn Traverse, Bogdan Bogdanovic, Charles Burchill, Leonard MacWilliam, Sandra Peterson, Carmen Steinbach, Randy Walld, and Erin Minish. Thanks to Carole Ouelette for final preparation of this document. We are indebted to the Manitoba Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation, Health Information Services (Manitoba Health) and the Office of Vital Statistics in the Agency of Consumer and Corporate Affairs for providing data. The results and conclusions are those of the authors and no official endorsement by Manitoba Health was intended or should be implied. This report was prepared at the request of Manitoba Health as part of the contract between the University of Manitoba and Manitoba Health. Tutorial Readers who would like to proceed directly to the section that describes how one might apply the information found in this document are encouraged to go directly to section 4: Interpreting the Data for Local Use, on page 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of Green and Teal Simple Grid Elementary School Book Report
    TRIBAL COUNCIL REPORT COVID-19 TESTING AND DISEASE IN FIRST NATIONS ON RESERVE APRIL 12, 2021 *The reports covers COVID-19 testing since the first reported case. The last TC report provided was on Tuesday April 6, 2021. DOTC Total Cases 154 Recovered Cases 145 New Cases 0 Active Cases 2 Total Deaths 7 Total Tests 2488 Tests in past week 34 5-Day Test Positivity Rate 0 FARHA Total Cases 1577 Recovered Cases 1293 New Cases 111 Active Cases 275 Total Deaths 9 Total Tests 8866 Tests in past week 495 5-Day Test Positivity Rate 18 Independent-North Total Cases 871 Recovered Cases 851 New Cases 1 Active Cases 14 Total Deaths 6 Total Tests 7568 Tests in past week 136 5-Day Test Positivity Rate 3 This summary report is intended to provide high-level analysis of COVID-19 testing and disease in First Nations on reserve by Tribal Council Region since first case until date noted above. APRIL 12, 2021 Independent- South Total Cases 218 Recovered Cases 214 New Cases 1 Active Cases 2 Total Deaths 2 Total Tests 1932 Tests in past week 30 5-Day Test Positivity Rate 6 IRTC Total Cases 380 Recovered Cases 370 New Cases 0 Active Cases 1 Total Deaths 9 Total Tests 3781 Tests in past week 55 5-Day Test Positivity Rate 0 KTC Total Cases 1011 Recovered Cases 948 New Cases 39 Active Cases 55 Total Deaths 8 Total Tests 7926 Tests in past week 391 5-Day Test Positivity Rate 10 This summary report is intended to provide high-level analysis of COVID-19 testing and disease in First Nations on reserve by Tribal Council Region since first case until date noted above.
    [Show full text]