DOCSLIB.ORG

Application for Renewal of Honeywell Metropolis Works

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Honeywell Specialty Materials Honeywell P.O. Box 430 Highway 45 North Metropolis, IL 62960 618 524-2111 618 524-6239 Fax May 27, 2005 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (UPS: 301-415-6334) Attention: Michael Raddatz Fuel Cycle Licensing Branch, Mail Stop T-8A33 Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Subject: Renewal of USNRC Source Materials License Re: Docket No. 40-3392 License No. SUB-526 Dear Sirs, Please find enclosed the Honeywell International Inc. application for renewal of USNRC Source Materials License SUB-526 for Honeywell's Metropolis, Illinois Uranium Conversion Facility (Docket No. 40-3392). This application has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 40. The content and format of the application and supporting materials are generally consistent with the guidance provided in USNRC Regulatory Guide 3.55, "Standard Format and Content for the Health and Safety Section of License Renewal Applications for Uranium Hexafluoride Production." We have incorporated certain variations from this guidance consistent with our April 26, 2005 discussions with the NRC staff. Enclosed are the following: * One original and 7 copies of the Metropolis Works USNRC Source Materials License Application (Regulatory Guide 3.55 Chapters 1 through 7), including USNRC Form 313 * One original and 7 copies of the revised Metropolis Works Emergency Response Plan * One original and 7 copies of the Metropolis Works Safety Demonstration Report (Regulatory Guide 3.55 Chapters 8 through 14), including related drawings and appendices * One original and 7 copies of the Metropolis Works Environmental Report * One compact disc containing the text files for each of the above in pdf format Attached to this letter, please find a summary of the significant changes to the License Application and Safety Demonstration Report. We hope that you will find these materials complete and in order. Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Darren Mays, Metropolis Works Health, Safety, and Environmental Manager, at (618) 524-6396. Sincerely, David B. Edwards Plant Manager Enclosures cc: Region II, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (UPS: 404-562-4731) Attention: Mr. Jay L. Henson Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 23 T85, 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303-3415 Honeywell Metropolis Works USNRC Source Materials License SUB-526 Summary of Significant Changes to License Application and Safety Demonstration Report General: 1. Split former license Parts 1 and 2 into two separate documents - the License Application and the Safety Demonstration Report (SDR). a. The License Application contains the conditions to which Honeywell is committed to ensure safe operation of the facility. b. The Safety Demonstration Report contains more detailed and explanatory information that supports the License Application. A significant amount of detailed information has been transferred from the License Application to the SDR, with basic commitments remaining in the License Application. 2. Provided drawings as an Appendix to the SDR to allow for updates as part of the SDR update process. 3. Provided updated radiological, effluent, and demographic data. 4. Deleted references to the deconversion system. 5. Provided references to applicable Regulatory Guides, consensus standards, and other documents. Detailed Chanqe Summarv Section Summary of Change (New) Front Provided table of contents and list of abbreviations matter 1.4 Provided updated licensed material possession information 1.5 Added product shipping and vehicle decontamination as authorized activities 1.6 Reduced level of detail provided for safety controls associated with cylinder filling, weight measurement, hydrocarbon controls, and glycol contamination controls. Transferred supporting technical details to SDR. 1.7 Reduced scope of radiological posting and labeling exemption to address labeling of source material containers only. Provided basis information in SDR. Deleted exemption related to use of the site Dispensary. Deleted details associated with leak testing of sealed sources, on-site disposal of radioactive waste (addressed by regulations) and material release (addressed in Section 3). 2.1 - 2.2 Provided updated organizational details, position descriptions, and information addressing authorization to change organizational structure and fill positions based on management prerogative, while maintaining separate lines of authority. 2.3 Provided description of revised Safety Committee structure, membership, and responsibilities 2.5 Provided updated description of employee training program I a m OS SO Q V Q F 2 F 2 Q V I TO OUR SHAREOWNERS Wee have turned the corner! And it feels great. In 2002 and 2003, we worked hard to resolve our big issues, get strong leadership teams in place, strengthen our balance sheet, and establish strong growth paths in every business even while our end markets suffered. It began to pay off in 2004 and looks even more exciting for 2005. FINANCIALS We had a very good year. Sales of $25.6 billion were up 11%, segment profit Xwas up in each of our businesses with increases of more than 20% in three of them, and cash flow from operations was robust at $2.3 billion. EPS was down 3% at $1.49 reflecting the surprise verdict in February 2005 regarding the New Jersey chrome case, an unusual item that reduced earnings by 19 cents per share. It is painful to adjust previously announced earnings for this unanticipated, legacy item. That said, this verdict has little impact on future operations and does not reflect on the value of the company. Excluding this charge, EPS was up 9% with the difference between EPS growth and segment profit growth primarily attributable to increased non-cash pension expense. The strength of our operations is encouraging. Our cash position and capital structure continued to improve, ending the year with net debt (total debt minus cash) to net capital (shareowners' equity plus net debt) of 13%. Having that cash gives us the flexibility to invest in our businesses and to increase returns for our shareowners. Reflecting our confidence in the future, wve raised the dividend 10% ... the first increase in five years. Taking advantage of a temporary stock price decline in the fourth quarter, we bought back an incremental 10 million shares in addition to the 10 million shares planned in 2004. These actions returned $1.3 billion to shareowners in 2004. We are also studying the provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act, which was signed by the President on October 22, 2004, giving us the opportu- nity in 2005 to bring back to the U.S. up to $2.6 billion of cash from our foreign operations at a significantly reduced rate of U.S. income tax. Congress or the Department of Treasury still must act on the Technical Corrections Bill, introduced in Congress on November 19, 2004, to provide clarity and confi- dence on the cash repatriation provision of the American Jobs Creation Act. Honeyvell 2004 1 | Cash flexibility also allowed us to continue improving the businesses. We completed 3 dispositions ($567 million sales, $426 million cash proceeds) and 11 acquisitions ($277 million sales, $384 million cash purchase). With our new, more rigorous acquisition process now in its third year, we feel confident about generating the necessary returns. We adhere strictly to the new process and it works. The year culminated with the announcement of our offer to acquire the shares of Novar plc. Subject to the completion of regulatory review, we expect to complete the transaction in the first quarter. The Intelligent Building Systems (IBS) division is a great addition to our Automation and Control Solutions (ACS) business. It adds a needed strengthening of our European fire detection, environmental controls, security, and services businesses. Roger Fradin and his team are already working hard to ensure we integrate quickly, efficiently, and effectively to realize the inherent synergies. The Security Printing Services (SPS - check printing) and Indalex Aluminum Solutions (IAS - aluminum extrusion) divisions of Novar are very strong businesses in their respective industries. They just don't fit with the Honey vell portfolio. There is already strong interest from the strategic and financial communities for these businesses ... to buy separately or together. We anticipate the sale of both within a year. This acquisition requires the work of integration in addition to that of selling two of three divisions but we expect when all is said and done this will be a great investment for us. PENSION AND ASBESTOS Our improvement in pension financial impact is encouraging. We have no cash funding issues and returns have been great. We expect the negative impact of pension expense (29C per share in 2004), driven principally by our conservative recognition of book losses, to begin declining in 2005. Asbestos exposure continues to run as predicted and is consistent with our The outlook for Honeywell is reserves. Claims settlement values in fact continue to run better than our original expectations. After 2005, bright. In the global economy, our expenditures associated with our NARCO exposure capital investment is expanding, should begin declining significantly. Even with asbestos expenditures, our 2005 free cash flow (cash from job growth continues, and cash operations minus CAPEX) should be $1.6 - $1.7 billion flows from most companies (estimated cash flow from operations of $2.4 - $2.5 billion, minus capital expenditures). We continue to believe our continue to improve. All good exposure is well understood and contained. It is not news for our businesses. dependent on legislative reform. Reform as contemplated by the U.S. Senate in the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution (FAIR) Act establishing a national trust find would be helpfil to us of course and, more importantly, critical for the country. We all hope they act on it. 2 Honecy-'ll 2004 I Introduced in 2002, Marketing the FOUR PILLARS OF GROWTH are the foundation of Honeywell's strategy to drive organic Dopng abTHE FOUR Developing grwhtruhsuperb job PLRSrobust growth through for our PILLARS technology processes and service customers roadmaps every day OF GROWTH excellence, innovative .
Recommended publications
  • SPECIAL ISSUES and CAMPAIGNS Internally Displaced Family in Sierra Leone

    SPECIAL ISSUES and CAMPAIGNS Internally Displaced Family in Sierra Leone

    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH WORLD REPORT 2002 SPECIAL ISSUES AND CAMPAIGNS Internally displaced family in Sierra Leone. © 1999 CORINNE DUFKA / HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ACADEMIC FREEDOM xtremism thrived in countries where assaults on academic freedom fos- Etered a climate of ignorance and intolerance.In Afghanistan,the ruling Tal- iban’s first actions were to shut down most higher education and ban women and girls from attending school. But in less extreme forms, governments around the world justified violations of human rights by casting all critical thought as an attack on public morality, national security, or cultural purity. In the wake of the attacks on New York City and Washington, several academics in the United States and Canada came under official or public pressure for questioning various aspects of their governments’ past or projected policies. With another international conflict simmering, violations of academic freedom were likely to increase around the globe. Even before September 11, 2001, academic groups were growing increasingly aware of the importance of international cooperation and coordination in support of their colleagues’ freedom. The international Network on Education and Acade- mic Rights (NEAR) was created in June 2001 to serve as a repository and clearing- house for information about academic freedom cases. With initial funding from UNESCO, the network promised to expand on the existing contact and coopera- tion between academics and academic groups. As the network’s name indicated, NEAR’s understanding of academic freedom embraced not just the civil and polit- ical rights of scholars and their students, but also the social, economic, and cultural rights associated with the fundamental human right to education.
  • Contracting in Complex Operations: Toward Developing a Contracting Framework for Security Sector Reconstruction and Reform

    Contracting in Complex Operations: Toward Developing a Contracting Framework for Security Sector Reconstruction and Reform

    SYR-CM-14-185 Contracting in Complex Operations: Toward Developing a Contracting Framework for Security Sector Reconstruction and Reform Final Technical Report: Naval Postgraduate School Acquisition Research Program Grant No. N00244-13-1-0021 Nicholas J. Armstrong, Ph.D. David M. Van Slyke, Ph.D. Syracuse University Abstract Scholarship on private military and security companies largely focuses on their regulation and oversight as security and reconstruction service providers. It gives scant attention, however, to their role as institutional reformers, advisors, and trainers. This report presents findings of an in- depth case study on the challenges of procuring advising and training services in Afghanistan. The study is grounded in the analysis of 77 confidential, semi-structured interviews with elite and mid- level officials embedded within the Afghan defense and interior ministries, national army, and national and local polices forces and further supported by 261 Afghanistan training and advising contract documents obtained via Freedom of Information Act request. We evaluate an existing contracting framework for the purchase and integration of complex products with this data and find that rules, relationship strategies, governance mechanisms, and mutual understanding are critical in security sector reform (SSR) training and advising contracts. However, reliance on the private sector to provide these services will likely remain high, thus, a sharper focus is necessary on mutually beneficial outcomes that retain flexibility and accountability over the long run. To achieve these outcomes, greater attention is needed to hiring the right people, contract design must balance requirements specificity with flexibility, and contract management activities must seek to bridge gaps among the critical actors involved with respect to roles, responsibilities, and critical capabilities.
  • Standards for Computer Aided Manufacturing

    Standards for Computer Aided Manufacturing

    //? VCr ~ / Ct & AFML-TR-77-145 )R^ yc ' )f f.3 Standards for Computer Aided Manufacturing Office of Developmental Automation and Control Technology Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20234 January 1977 Final Technical Report, March— December 1977 Distribution limited to U.S. Government agencies only; Test and Evaluation Data; Statement applied November 1976. Other requests for this document must be referred to AFML/LTC, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433 Manufacturing Technology Division Air Force Materials Laboratory Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433 . NOTICES When Government drawings, specifications, or other data are used for any purpose other than in connection with a definitely related Government procurement opera- tion, the United States Government thereby incurs no responsibility nor any obligation whatsoever; and the fact that the Government may have formulated, furnished, or in any way supplied the said drawing, specification, or other data, is not to be regarded by implication or otherwise as in any manner licensing the holder or any person or corporation, or conveying any rights or permission to manufacture, use, or sell any patented invention that may in any way be related thereto Copies of this report should not be returned unless return is required by security considerations, contractual obligations, or notice on a specified document This final report was submitted by the National Bureau of Standards under military interdepartmental procurement request FY1457-76 -00369 , "Manufacturing Methods Project on Standards for Computer Aided Manufacturing." This technical report has been reviewed and is approved for publication. FOR THE COMMANDER: DtiWJNlb L.
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002

    Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002

    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002 Requested date: 2002 Release date: 2003 Posted date: 08-February-2021 Source of document: Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 Filing a FOIA Records Request Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. 1 O ct 2000_30 April 2002 Creation Date Requester Last Name Case Subject 36802.28679 STRANEY TECHNOLOGICAL GROWTH OF INDIA; HONG KONG; CHINA AND WTO 36802.2992 CRAWFORD EIGHT DIFFERENT REQUESTS FOR REPORTS REGARDING CIA EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS 36802.43927 MONTAN EDWARD GRADY PARTIN 36802.44378 TAVAKOLI-NOURI STEPHEN FLACK GUNTHER 36810.54721 BISHOP SCIENCE OF IDENTITY FOUNDATION 36810.55028 KHEMANEY TI LEAF PRODUCTIONS, LTD.
  • Appendix B Wwns Case Shows Racial Discrimination Is Alive and Well

    Appendix B Wwns Case Shows Racial Discrimination Is Alive and Well

    National Black Church Initiative P.O. Box 65177 Washington, DC 20035 202­744­0184 [email protected] www.naltblackchurch.com January 4, 2011 Steve Feinberg Chief Executive Officer Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. 299 Park Avenue New York, NY 10171 Dan Quayle Chairman Cerberus Global Investments, LLC 299 Park Avenue – 22nd Fl New York, NY 10171 John W. Snow Chairman Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. 299 Park Avenue – 22nd Fl New York, NY 10171 Steven F. Gaffney Chairman and CEO DynCorp International 3190 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 700 Falls Church, VA 22042 Dear Mr. Feinberg: Re: World Wide Network Services, LLC (WWNS) VS. DynCorp/Cerberus The National Black Church Initiative (NBCI), a faith­based coalition of 34,000 churches comprised of 15 denominations and 15.7 million African Americans, is dedicated to the eradication of racial disparities. We are working with our black church leadership partners and their 66,000 churches nationwide to use the full force of our combined 100,000 churches to advocate on behalf of our 1 membership and to bring attention to causes which disrupt the fabric of equality in the United States. Through recent press coverage we have been made aware of the atrocities committed by one of your companies, DynCorp International, against an African American owned business, Worldwide Network Services, LLC (WWNS). NBCI member and WWNS co­founder Reginald Bailey along with WWNS employees ­ many of whom were single mothers ­ and WWNS shareholders were the tragic victims of racial discrimination. The repercussions of that discrimination continue to damage, if not ruin, those affected by these egregious acts.
  • Blue Bird Corporation 2016 Proxy Statement

    Blue Bird Corporation 2016 Proxy Statement

    February 3, 2017 Dear Fellow Shareholder: You are cordially invited to join Blue Bird Corporation’s Board of Directors and senior leadership at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be held at 9:00 a.m. local time on Wednesday, March 8, 2017, at the Macon Marriott City Center, 240 Coliseum Drive, Macon, GA 31217. The accompanying Notice of the Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement provide important information about the meeting and will serve as your guide to the business to be conducted at the meeting. The Company’s 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders is also enclosed. We hope that you will be able to attend the meeting. Your vote is very important to us. We urge you to read the accompanying materials regarding the matters to be voted on at the meeting and to submit your voting instructions by proxy. You may submit your proxy either by returning the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form, or by submitting your proxy over the telephone or the Internet. If you submit your proxy before the meeting but later decide to attend the meeting in person, you may still vote in person at the meeting. Thank you for your continued support. Sincerely, /s/ Phil Horlock Phil Horlock Chief Executive Officer and Director Blue Bird Corporation NOTICE OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MARCH 8, 2017 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Blue Bird Corporation (the “Company”) will be held on Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at the hour of 9:00 a.m.
  • Čestné Prohlášení

    Čestné Prohlášení

    VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V BRNĚ BRNO UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY FAKULTA STROJNÍHO INŢENÝRSTVÍ ÚSTAV STROJÍRENSKÉ TECHNOLOGIE FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY VÝROBA PLYNOVÝCH VENTILŮ NA AUTOMATICKÉ LINCE PRODUCTION OF GAS VALVES ON THE AUTOMATIC LINE DIPLOMOVÁ PRÁCE DIPLOMA THESIS AUTOR PRÁCE BC. MILAN PEŠL AUTHOR VEDOUCÍ PRÁCE ING. MAREK ŠTRONER, PH.D. SUPERVISOR BRNO 2011 Vysoké učení technické v Brně, Fakulta strojního inženýrství Ústav strojírenské technologie Akademický rok: 2010/2011 ZADÁNÍ DIPLOMOVÉ PRÁCE student(ka): Bc. Milan Pešl který/která studuje v magisterském navazujícím studijním programu obor: Strojírenská technologie a průmyslový management (2303T005) Ředitel ústavu Vám v souladu se zákonem č.111/1998 o vysokých školách a se Studijním a zkušebním řádem VUT v Brně určuje následující téma diplomové práce: Výroba plynových ventilů na automatické lince v anglickém jazyce: Production of gas valves on the automatic line Stručná charakteristika problematiky úkolu: Na základě poznatků při výrobě plynových ventilů na automatické lince ve firmě Honeywell bude řešena problematika automatizace a manipulace, chodu automatické linky, testování ventilů, akce na snížení počtu vadných kusů při výrobě a implementace kamerového systému na detekci chyb šroubování. Cíle diplomové práce: Seznámení s automatizovanou výrobní linkou na plynové ventily a její rozložení. Popis principu práce linky a typy ventilů, které se na ní výrábějí. Testy používané ke kontrole funkčnosti ventilů. Statisté zhodnocení výroby a kamerový systém pro kontrolu šroubů. Seznam odborné literatury: 1. DRAŽAN, František., JEŘÁBEK, Karel. Manipulace s materiálem. 1. vyd. Praha : SNTL, 1989. 456 s. ISBN 04-220-79. 2. HLAVENKA, Bohumil. Manipulace s materiálem. 4. vyd. Brno : VUT, 2001. 164 s. ISBN 80-214-0068-4.
  • Albertsons Companies, Inc. Form DEF 14A Filed 2021-06-24

    Albertsons Companies, Inc. Form DEF 14A Filed 2021-06-24

    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM DEF 14A Definitive proxy statements Filing Date: 2021-06-24 | Period of Report: 2021-08-05 SEC Accession No. 0001140361-21-022208 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Albertsons Companies, Inc. Mailing Address Business Address 250 PARKCENTER BLVD. 250 PARKCENTER BLVD. CIK:1646972| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 0227 BOISE ID 83706 BOISE ID 83706 Type: DEF 14A | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-39350 | Film No.: 211043788 208-395-6200 SIC: 5411 Grocery stores Copyright © 2021 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document TABLE OF CONTENTS UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ Check the appropriate box: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☒ Definitive Proxy Statement ☐ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12 Albertsons Companies, Inc. (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ☒ No fee required ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. 1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies 2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: 3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): 4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: 5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
  • Standards for Computer Aided Manufacturing

    Standards for Computer Aided Manufacturing

    NBSIR 76-1094 (R) Standards for Computer Aided Manufacturing John M. Evans, Jr., Ph.D., Project Manager Joseph T. O'Neill John L. Little James S. Albus, Ph.D. Anthony J. Barbera, Ph.D. Dennis W. Fife, Ph.D. Elizabeth N. Fong David E. Gilsinn, Ph.D. Frances E. Holberton Brian G. Lucas, Ph.D. Gordon E. Lyon, Ph.D. Beatrice A. S. Marron Albercht J. Neumann Mabel V. Vickers Justin C. Walker Office of Developmental Automation and Control Technology Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology National Bureau of Standards Washington, D. C. 20234 Second Interim Report October, 1976 Prepared for Manufacturing Technology Division Air Force Materials Laboratory Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433 NBSIR 76-1094 (R) STANDARDS FOR COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING John M. Evans, Jr., Ph D., Project Manager Joseph T. O'Neill John L. Little James S. Albus, Ph D. Anthony J. Barbera, Ph.D. Dennis W. Fife, Ph.D. Elizabeth N. Fong David E. Gilsinn, Ph D. Frances E. Holberton Brian G. Lucas, Ph D Gordon E. Lyon, Ph D. Beatrice A. S. Marron Albercht J. Neumann Mabel V. Vickers Justin C. Walker Office of Developmental Automation and Control Technology Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology National Bureau of Standards Washington, D. C. 20234 Second Interim Report October, 1976 Prepared for Manufacturing Technology Division Air Force Materials Laboratory Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary Edward O. Vetter, Under Secretary Dr. Betsy Ancker-Johnson, Assistant Secretary for Science and Technology NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler.
  • Creativity – Success – Obscurity

    Creativity – Success – Obscurity

    Author Gerry Pickering CREATIVITY – SUCCESS – OBSCURITY UNIVAC, WHAT HAPPENED? A fellow retiree posed the question of what happened. How did the company that invented the computer snatch defeat from the jaws of victory? The question piqued my interest, thus I tried to draw on my 32 years of experiences in the company and the myriad of information available on the Internet to answer the question for myself and hopefully others that may still be interested 60+ years after the invention and delivery of the first computers. Computers plural, as there were more than one computer and more than one organization from which UNIVAC descended. J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly, located in Philadelphia PA are credited with inventing the first general purpose computer under a contract with the U.S. Army. But our heritage also traces back to a second group of people in St. Paul MN who developed several computers about the same time under contract with the U.S. Navy. This is the story of how these two companies started separately, merged to become one company, how that merged company named UNIVAC (Universal Automatic Computers) grew to become a main rival of IBM (International Business Machines), then how UNIVAC was swallowed by another company to end up in near obscurity compared to IBM and a changing industry. Admittedly it is a biased story, as I observed the industry from my perspective as an employee of UNIVAC. It is also biased in that I personally observed only a fraction of the events as they unfolded within UNIVAC. This story concludes with a detailed account of my work assignments within UNIVAC.
  • Bibliography of BBN Documents on Parallel Processing 1.0 MONARCH

    Bibliography of BBN Documents on Parallel Processing 1.0 MONARCH

    Bibliography of BBN documents on parallel processing (this file was passed to D. Walden by Mike Beeler sometime in 1994 or earlier) 1.0 MONARCH 1.1 Monarch External Publications "Contention is No Obstacle to Shared-Memory Multiprocessing," Rettberg, R. and Thomas, R.; Communications of the ACM, Vol. 29, Number 12, December 1986, pp 1202-1212. 1.2 Monarch Internal Publications "Multiprocessor System Architectures: The Monarch Multiprocessor, vol. 2: Technical Proposal," BBN Labs, November 1984. The only technical description of the Monarch architecture I have been able thus far to locate. "Dynamic Delay Adjustment: A Technique for High-Speed Asynchronous Communication," BBN Labs, December 1985. Authors: P. Bassett, L. Glasser, R. Rettberg. Presents the circuit- based Dynamic Delay Adjustment (DDA) technique for automatically adjusting signal delays in a MOS system. The technique is characterized by global clock frequency distribution coupled with local, on-chip modems which dynamically adjust the effective delay of data streams between chips. Paper was presented at the Fourth MIT Conference on Advanced Research in VLSI, April 7-9, 1986. "Shared Memory Parallel Processors: The Butterfly and the Monarch," BBN Labs, April 1986. Author: Randy D. Rettberg. Presented at the Fourth MIT Conference on Advanced Research in VLSI, April 7-9, l986. 2.0 BUTTERFLY 2.1 Butterfly External Publications "Evaluation of Multiprocessor Communication Architectures," A.B. Lake, M.S. Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, MIT, October 1982. Presents the Butterfly Multiprocessor. "Beyond The Baskett Benchmark," M. Beeler, BBN Author, Computer Architecture News, Association for Computing Machinery, Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture, vol. 12 no. 1, March 1984.
  • Honeywell International Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

    Honeywell International Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K S ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 OR £ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-8974 Honeywell International Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 22-2640650 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 101 Columbia Road Morris Township, New Jersey 07962 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (973) 455-2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of Each Exchange Title of Each Class on Which Registered Common Stock, par value $1 per share* New York Stock Exchange Chicago Stock Exchange 1 9 /2% Debentures due June 1, 2016 New York Stock Exchange * The common stock is also listed on the London Stock Exchange. Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes S No £ Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes £ No S Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.