DOCSLIB.ORG

310 Small Arms Survey 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

310 SMALL ARMS SURVEY 2011 INDEX Arab Model Law on Weapons, Ammunitions private security companies, personnel Explosives and Hazardous Material 104 A 265 authorized transfers, light weapons Argentina 4, 9–35 acoustic technology, police weapons 83 exports, transparency 17 Automatic Colt Pistol (ACP) 74 ACP see Automatic Colt Pistol informal security groups 103 ACT see Australian Capital Territory private security companies, personnel Active Denial System 86 104 Adaptive Combat Rifle 76 Aristide, Jean-Bertrand 230, 231 B Aegis 125 Arizona (United States) Bamako Declaration see Organization of Afghanistan civilian firearms African Unity ammunition 76 carrying in public 295 banditry, Côte d’Ivoire 208–9 ATGWs 32–3 prohibited and restricted 272 Bangladesh light weapons use 23–4 transfer regulation 284 imports private security companies 101 Armatix (Germany) personalized gun mortars 24–5 armed 112, 115, 116 technology 80 reusable rocket launchers 29 firearm stockpiles 113 armed gangs, Haiti 253–5 Barrick Gold 142 firearm types 117–19 Armenia, imports, grenade launchers 26 Bédié, Henri Konan 195, 196, 197 illicit arms possession 119–20 Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) Belgium personnel 104 negotiations 43–4, 53–5 exports, transparency 15, 16, 19 Africa open-ended working group 53–4 private security companies, personnel private security companies, armed Preparatory Committee 54–5 104 114, 115 Arsenal (Bulgaria), airburst grenades 25 Belize regional measures, civilian firearms art, firearm use 286 civilian firearms 264 AT4 rocket launcher 27 licences 280, 282 age, firearm possession 275–6 ATCA see United States, Alien Tort Claims prohibited and restricted 269 AK-47 assault rifle, use by private security Act storage requirements 293 companies 114, 117–18, 119 ATGWs see anti-tank guided weapons transfer regulation 283 Albania ATT see Arms Trade Treaty user regulation 276, 277, 279 private security companies Attenuating Energy Projectile 81, 89 Biennial Meeting of States (BMS) see firearm stockpiles 113 AUG, Steyr rifle 77 United Nations, Biennial Meeting of personnel 104 Australia States alcohol, civilian firearm users 277 civilian firearms BILL ATGW 30 Alexander, John 84 licences 280, 282 Blackwater (now Xe Services) 101, 108, Alexandre, Boniface 234 prohibited and restricted 269 109, 121 ammunition, technological developments registration 273 BMS see United Nations, Biennial Meeting 25, 75–7 regulation 266 of States Amnesty International, private security self-defence use 289–90 Bolivia, private security companies, companies, monitoring 150 transfer regulation 282 personnel 104 Andean Plan to Prevent, Combat and use regulation 286 border controls, UN Programme of Action Eradicate Illicit Trade in Small Arms user regulation 276 44–6, 58 and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects exports, transparency 17 Bosnia and Herzegovina 265 mass shootings 266 exports, transparency 15, 17 AngloGold Ashanti 140, 156 police handguns 74 private security companies Angola private security companies firearm stockpiles 113 private security companies 145 armed 115 personnel 104 firearm stockpiles 113 personnel 104 Brazil firearm types 117 stockpile management 121 civilian firearms personnel 104 Australian Capital Territory (ACT) carrying in public 293 regulation 150 (Australia) prohibited and restricted 268, 269 training 124 civilian firearms registration 273 anti-tank guided weapons (ATGWs) prohibited and restricted 269 user regulation 276, 278–9 definition 29–30 user regulation 276, 279 exports, transparency 17 producers 31 Austria informal security groups 103 transfers 31–3, 35 exports, transparency 16 private security companies INDEX 311 abuses 150 police firearms 77 carrying in public 296 firearm stockpiles 113 private security companies prohibited and restricted 269 illicit arms possession 119 armed 114, 115 multinational corporations, security 147 personnel 104 personnel 104 private security companies 143 brokering, UN Programme of Action 57 production, MANPADS 33 armed 112, 113 Brügger and Thomet (Switzerland), kinetic CHOUKA less-lethal projective launchers firearm stockpiles 113 energy weapons 81–2 72, 81 personnel 104 Bulgaria civilian firearms regulation 151 exports, transparency 16 approaches to regulation 265–8 training 124 private security companies carrying in public 293–6 Colt’s Manufacturing (United States), safety armed 112 conditions of possession 290–6 features 79 personnel 104 international regulation 263–4 Combined Tactical Systems (United licence or permit to possess 281 States), kinetic energy weapons 81 licences community security 3 penalties 282 Côte d’Ivoire 211–12 C quantity restrictions 281–2 competency, civilian firearm users 278–9 California (United States) types 280–1 Comtrade see United Nations, Commodity civilian firearms waiting periods 282 Trade Statistics Database licences 281, 282 mass shootings, regulatory responses Condor (Brazil), less-lethal grenades 93 prohibited and restricted 272 266–7 Congrès Panafricain des Jeunes et des transfer regulation 284 national regulation 262, 268–74, 296 Patriotes (Pan-African Congress of user regulation 279 parallel permit 281 Young Patriots, COJEP) 214 Canada permit to acquire 281 corporate complicity 152–3 Braidwood Commission 92–3 permit to carry 281 corporate social responsibility, multinational civilian firearms professional use 286 corporations 139–41, 151–3 licences 280, 281, 282 prohibited and restricted 268–73 Costa Rica prohibited and restricted 269 regional regulation 264–5 private security companies registration 273, 274 registration 273–4 firearm stockpiles 113 regulation 266 regulation 6, 261–96 personnel 104 self-defence use 289 reporting requirements 290–1 Côte d’Ivoire storage requirements 292 safe storage 291–3 armed forces 197–9 transfer regulation 283 transfers, regulation 282–4 banditry 208–9 use regulation 285, 286 use regulation 284–96 community security 3, 211–12 user regulation 276, 277–8, 278 collection or museum 286 comzones 202–3, 211, 218–19 exports, transparency 16 genuine reason 284–5 conflict 193, 194–7 imports hunting 285 crime 207–9 recoilless guns 27 performance or art 286 DDM programme 213, 219 single-shot disposable systems 28 profession 286 DDR programmes 219 mass shootings 266 self-defence 286–90 dozos (traditional hunters) 3, 212 Cape Verde, private security companies, users gendarmerie, weapons 199, 200 public perception 106 age restrictions 275–6 gender-based violence 209 Carl Gustaf recoilless rifle 26–7 competency 278–9 independence 197 cattle rustling, Madagascar 182–4 criminal record 277–8 insecurity CECOS see Centre de Commandement des drug dependency and intoxication concerns 206–8 Opérations de Sécurité 277 perceptions of 207 Central America, private security mental and physical health 276–7 types of 208–11 companies, regulation 150–1 public interest 278 international forces 216 Centre de Commandement des Opérations regulation 275–84 judicial system 201, 203, 219–20 de Sécurité (CECOS) (Côte d’Ivoire) civilians, registration for firearm militias 212–14 198–9, 200, 211 possession 275–80 non-state security 211–16 Chevron Nigeria Ltd 148 COJEP see Congrès Panafricain des Jeunes police, weapons 199, 200 Chile, private security companies, et des Patriotes political history 194–9 personnel 104 cold war, Madagascar 172–3 post-electoral crisis (2010) 193, 221 China Colombia prisons 201 exports, transparency 17 civilian firearms private security companies 312 SMALL ARMS SURVEY 2011 armed 3, 215 Democratic Republic of the Congo, private electric-shock weapons, police use personnel 104 security companies, training 123 85, 89–92 rebel forces 193, 196–7, 202–4 Denmark Eryx ATGWs 32 weapons 204 exports, transparency 15, 16 Estonia resource-based conflict 209 private security companies, personnel civilian firearms security forces 6 104 licences 280, 281 fragmentation 199–201 development, security systems 2 prohibited and restricted 270 perceptions of 205–6 directed-energy weapons 85–6 registration 273 reform 194, 216–20, 221 disarmament, demobilization, and storage requirements 293 vectors of insecurity 210–11 reintegration (DDR), Côte d’Ivoire 219 transfer regulation 283 weapons 200, 204 disarmament and dismantling of militias use regulation 286 violence linked to electoral process (DDM), Côte d’Ivoire 213, 219 user regulation 276, 277, 279, 280 209–10 Dominican Republic private security companies, personnel COUGAR less-lethal projective launchers civilian firearms 104 72, 81 prohibited and restricted 268, 270 ethnic violence, Côte d’Ivoire 197–8 crime user regulation 276, 277 EU see European Union Côte d’Ivoire 207–9 private security companies European Code of Police Ethics 71 Haiti 231, 238–42 armed 112, 113 European Union (EU) Madagascar 180–1 personnel 104 European Weapons Directive 265 criminal records, civilian firearm users dozos (traditional hunters), Côte d’Ivoire export licences, refusals 19 277–8 3, 212 export licences, EU 19 Croatia drug dependency, civilian firearm users exporters, rankings 11 civilian firearms 277 eXtended Range Electro-Muscular carrying in public 293 drug trafficking, Madagascar 186 Projectile (XREP) 85 licences 280 Duvalier, ‘Papa Doc’ and ‘Baby Doc’ 231 extractive industries, use of private prohibited and restricted 270 DynCorp 125 security companies 135–58 storage requirements 293 Dziekanski, Robert 91 transfer regulation 283 use regulation 284, 286 user regulation 276, 277, 279 F exports, transparency 17 E FAFN see Forces Armées des Forces imports, grenade launchers 26 Eastern Europe, private security Nouvelles private security companies companies, armed
Recommended publications
  • SPECIAL ISSUES and CAMPAIGNS Internally Displaced Family in Sierra Leone

    SPECIAL ISSUES and CAMPAIGNS Internally Displaced Family in Sierra Leone

    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH WORLD REPORT 2002 SPECIAL ISSUES AND CAMPAIGNS Internally displaced family in Sierra Leone. © 1999 CORINNE DUFKA / HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ACADEMIC FREEDOM xtremism thrived in countries where assaults on academic freedom fos- Etered a climate of ignorance and intolerance.In Afghanistan,the ruling Tal- iban’s first actions were to shut down most higher education and ban women and girls from attending school. But in less extreme forms, governments around the world justified violations of human rights by casting all critical thought as an attack on public morality, national security, or cultural purity. In the wake of the attacks on New York City and Washington, several academics in the United States and Canada came under official or public pressure for questioning various aspects of their governments’ past or projected policies. With another international conflict simmering, violations of academic freedom were likely to increase around the globe. Even before September 11, 2001, academic groups were growing increasingly aware of the importance of international cooperation and coordination in support of their colleagues’ freedom. The international Network on Education and Acade- mic Rights (NEAR) was created in June 2001 to serve as a repository and clearing- house for information about academic freedom cases. With initial funding from UNESCO, the network promised to expand on the existing contact and coopera- tion between academics and academic groups. As the network’s name indicated, NEAR’s understanding of academic freedom embraced not just the civil and polit- ical rights of scholars and their students, but also the social, economic, and cultural rights associated with the fundamental human right to education.
  • Contracting in Complex Operations: Toward Developing a Contracting Framework for Security Sector Reconstruction and Reform

    Contracting in Complex Operations: Toward Developing a Contracting Framework for Security Sector Reconstruction and Reform

    SYR-CM-14-185 Contracting in Complex Operations: Toward Developing a Contracting Framework for Security Sector Reconstruction and Reform Final Technical Report: Naval Postgraduate School Acquisition Research Program Grant No. N00244-13-1-0021 Nicholas J. Armstrong, Ph.D. David M. Van Slyke, Ph.D. Syracuse University Abstract Scholarship on private military and security companies largely focuses on their regulation and oversight as security and reconstruction service providers. It gives scant attention, however, to their role as institutional reformers, advisors, and trainers. This report presents findings of an in- depth case study on the challenges of procuring advising and training services in Afghanistan. The study is grounded in the analysis of 77 confidential, semi-structured interviews with elite and mid- level officials embedded within the Afghan defense and interior ministries, national army, and national and local polices forces and further supported by 261 Afghanistan training and advising contract documents obtained via Freedom of Information Act request. We evaluate an existing contracting framework for the purchase and integration of complex products with this data and find that rules, relationship strategies, governance mechanisms, and mutual understanding are critical in security sector reform (SSR) training and advising contracts. However, reliance on the private sector to provide these services will likely remain high, thus, a sharper focus is necessary on mutually beneficial outcomes that retain flexibility and accountability over the long run. To achieve these outcomes, greater attention is needed to hiring the right people, contract design must balance requirements specificity with flexibility, and contract management activities must seek to bridge gaps among the critical actors involved with respect to roles, responsibilities, and critical capabilities.
  • Project Manager Combat Ammunition Systems Product Manager Excalibur Product Manager Guided Precision Munitions and Mortar System

    Project Manager Combat Ammunition Systems Product Manager Excalibur Product Manager Guided Precision Munitions and Mortar System

    AMMUNITION tem (GPS) precision-guidance technology mortar cartridge with 10 meters CEP accu - with an inertial measurement unit to pro - racy to rapidly defeat personnel targets The Program Executive Office for Am - vide accurate, first-round fire-for-effect ca - while minimizing collateral damage. APMI munition (PEO Ammunition) has the mis - pability in an urban setting with accuracy is compatible with U.S. dismounted 120 mm sion to continue being the best provider of better than 4 meters circular error probable weapons and fire-control system, and the conventional, leap-ahead munitions, mor - (CEP). Excalibur is approximately 1 meter Stryker double-V hull mortar carrier and tars, towed artillery systems and counter- in length and weighs 106 pounds. Its ex - fire-control system. It has been successfully improvised explosive device (IED) prod - tended range (up to 40 kilometers) and used in operations in OEF. ucts by fostering innovation and diversity high accuracy result in increased lethality The PGK is a GPS guidance kit with prox- for the warfighter. Project managers within with a decrease in required volume of fire imity and point detonating fuzing func - the PEO are Combat Ammunition Systems, per engagement. Excalibur Increment Ia is tions. It is compatible with existing high-ex - Maneuver Ammunition Systems, Joint Pro - currently completing the last of its full-rate plosive, 155 mm M549A1 and M795 cannon gram Manager Towed Artillery Systems, production, and Excalibur Increment Ib has artillery projectiles. The PGK corrects the Close Combat Systems, Project Director initiated low-rate initial production. ballistic trajectory of the projectile to reduce Joint Services and Project Director Joint delivery errors and improves projectile ac - Products.
  • Appellee Submission of the United States of America

    Appellee Submission of the United States of America

    UNITED STATES – COUNTERVAILING AND ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CERTAIN PRODUCTS FROM CHINA (AB-2014-4 / DS449) APPELLEE SUBMISSION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA April 30, 2014 SERVICE LIST Participant H.E. Mr. Yu Jianhua, Permanent Mission of China Third Participants H.E. Mr. Hamish McCormick, Permanent Mission of Australia H.E. Mr. Jonathan T. Fried, Permanent Mission of Canada H.E. Mr. Angelos Pangratis, Permanent Mission of the European Union H.E. Mr. Jayant Dasgupta, Permanent Mission of India H.E. Mr. Yoichi Otabe, Permanent Mission of Japan H.E. Mr. Alexey Borodavkin, Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation H.E. Mr. Mehmet Haluk Ilicak, Permanent Mission of Turkey H.E. Mr. Nguyen Trung Thanh, Permanent Mission of Viet Nam TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF REPORTS .................................................................................................................. iii I. Introduction And Executive Summary ............................................................................... 1 A. Overview ................................................................................................................. 1 B. Summary of Key Facts as Found by the Panel and Erroneous Assertions by China ................................................................................................................................. 3 C. The Panel Correctly Interpreted Article X:2 and Applied Its Understanding
  • Oman Country Report

    Oman Country Report

    SALW Guide Global distribution and visual identification Oman Country report https://salw-guide.bicc.de Weapons Distribution SALW Guide Weapons Distribution The following list shows the weapons which can be found in Oman and whether there is data on who holds these weapons: AK-47 / AKM G M79 G AR 15 (M16/M4) U MBDA MILAN G Browning M 2 G Mossberg 500 U FN FAL G SIG SG540 G FN Herstal FN MAG G Simonov SKS G FN High Power U Sterling MP L2A3 G Lee-Enfield SMLE U Steyr AUG G M203 grenade launcher G Explanation of symbols Country of origin Licensed production Production without a licence G Government: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is held by Governmental agencies. N Non-Government: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is held by non-Governmental armed groups. U Unspecified: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is found in the country, but do not specify whether it is held by Governmental agencies or non-Governmental armed groups. It is entirely possible to have a combination of tags beside each country. For example, if country X is tagged with a G and a U, it means that at least one source of data identifies Governmental agencies as holders of weapon type Y, and at least one other source confirms the presence of the weapon in country X without specifying who holds it. Note: This application is a living, non-comprehensive database, relying to a great extent on active contributions (provision and/or validation of data and information) by either SALW experts from the military and international renowned think tanks or by national and regional focal points of small arms control entities.
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002

    Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002

    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002 Requested date: 2002 Release date: 2003 Posted date: 08-February-2021 Source of document: Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 Filing a FOIA Records Request Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. 1 O ct 2000_30 April 2002 Creation Date Requester Last Name Case Subject 36802.28679 STRANEY TECHNOLOGICAL GROWTH OF INDIA; HONG KONG; CHINA AND WTO 36802.2992 CRAWFORD EIGHT DIFFERENT REQUESTS FOR REPORTS REGARDING CIA EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS 36802.43927 MONTAN EDWARD GRADY PARTIN 36802.44378 TAVAKOLI-NOURI STEPHEN FLACK GUNTHER 36810.54721 BISHOP SCIENCE OF IDENTITY FOUNDATION 36810.55028 KHEMANEY TI LEAF PRODUCTIONS, LTD.
  • COUNTY of SOMERSET NEW JERSEY PO Box 3000

    COUNTY of SOMERSET NEW JERSEY PO Box 3000

    COUNTY OF SOMERSET NEW JERSEY PO Box 3000 – 20 Grove Street COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING SOMERVILLE, NJ 08876-1262 PURCHASING DIVISION PHONE: (908) 231-7188 Karen McGee Fax: (908) 575-3917 Purchasing Agent, QPA [email protected] NOTICE TO BIDDERS #2-SOCCP Sealed bids will be received by the Purchasing Agent for the County of Somerset on December 4, 2015 at 2:30 PM prevailing time in the Purchasing Division, County Administration Building, 20 Grove St., Somerville, NJ 08876 at which time and place bids will be opened and read in public for: Open End Co-Operative Pricing Bid Ammunition & Related Police Supplies Contract #: JCC-0014-15 Proposals must be made on the standard proposal forms, be enclosed in a sealed package bearing the name and address of the bidder and the “BID TITLE NAME & CONTRACT #” on the outside, addressed to Karen McGee, Purchasing Agent, at the address above. We are now storing all responses electronically; therefore submit all pages of the response on a CD in addition to the printed copies. The Ammunition & Related Police Supplies spreadsheet can be included on the same CD in a separate file in Excel format (not PDF) Bid Addenda will be issued on the website. Therefore, interested bidders should check the website from now through bid opening. It is the sole responsibility of the respondent to be knowledgeable of all addenda related to this procurement. Specifications and instruction to bidders may be obtained at the Purchasing Office or the County website at www.co.somerset.nj.us Bidders shall comply with the requirements of N.J.S.A.
  • Appendix B Wwns Case Shows Racial Discrimination Is Alive and Well

    Appendix B Wwns Case Shows Racial Discrimination Is Alive and Well

    National Black Church Initiative P.O. Box 65177 Washington, DC 20035 202­744­0184 [email protected] www.naltblackchurch.com January 4, 2011 Steve Feinberg Chief Executive Officer Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. 299 Park Avenue New York, NY 10171 Dan Quayle Chairman Cerberus Global Investments, LLC 299 Park Avenue – 22nd Fl New York, NY 10171 John W. Snow Chairman Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. 299 Park Avenue – 22nd Fl New York, NY 10171 Steven F. Gaffney Chairman and CEO DynCorp International 3190 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 700 Falls Church, VA 22042 Dear Mr. Feinberg: Re: World Wide Network Services, LLC (WWNS) VS. DynCorp/Cerberus The National Black Church Initiative (NBCI), a faith­based coalition of 34,000 churches comprised of 15 denominations and 15.7 million African Americans, is dedicated to the eradication of racial disparities. We are working with our black church leadership partners and their 66,000 churches nationwide to use the full force of our combined 100,000 churches to advocate on behalf of our 1 membership and to bring attention to causes which disrupt the fabric of equality in the United States. Through recent press coverage we have been made aware of the atrocities committed by one of your companies, DynCorp International, against an African American owned business, Worldwide Network Services, LLC (WWNS). NBCI member and WWNS co­founder Reginald Bailey along with WWNS employees ­ many of whom were single mothers ­ and WWNS shareholders were the tragic victims of racial discrimination. The repercussions of that discrimination continue to damage, if not ruin, those affected by these egregious acts.
  • Blue Bird Corporation 2016 Proxy Statement

    Blue Bird Corporation 2016 Proxy Statement

    February 3, 2017 Dear Fellow Shareholder: You are cordially invited to join Blue Bird Corporation’s Board of Directors and senior leadership at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be held at 9:00 a.m. local time on Wednesday, March 8, 2017, at the Macon Marriott City Center, 240 Coliseum Drive, Macon, GA 31217. The accompanying Notice of the Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement provide important information about the meeting and will serve as your guide to the business to be conducted at the meeting. The Company’s 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders is also enclosed. We hope that you will be able to attend the meeting. Your vote is very important to us. We urge you to read the accompanying materials regarding the matters to be voted on at the meeting and to submit your voting instructions by proxy. You may submit your proxy either by returning the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form, or by submitting your proxy over the telephone or the Internet. If you submit your proxy before the meeting but later decide to attend the meeting in person, you may still vote in person at the meeting. Thank you for your continued support. Sincerely, /s/ Phil Horlock Phil Horlock Chief Executive Officer and Director Blue Bird Corporation NOTICE OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MARCH 8, 2017 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Blue Bird Corporation (the “Company”) will be held on Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at the hour of 9:00 a.m.
  • Les Armes (2E Partie)

    Les Armes (2E Partie)

    12 ANTAC Panorama de la législation/ réglementation des armes les armes (2e partie) Que l’on soit tireur débutant ou expert chevronné, la réglementation française en matière d’armes se révèle un véritable casse-tête juridique ! Nous avons tenté de la rendre plus compréhensible, à l’aide de tableaux synoptiques, les véhicules, d’attribuer une afi n de répondre aux immatriculation à chaque questions les plus fréquemment Pour familiariser les lecteurs avec certains aspects de la réglementation arme. Une fiche “dématé- posées par les amateurs d’armes, entrée en vigueur en septembre 2013, rialisée” (= informatisée) sera Cibles a déjà publié plusieurs hors- tireurs, collectionneurs séries (novembre 2013, mai 2014, pré-renseignée en amont, lors ou chasseurs... novembre 2014). Ils restent valides pour du passage désormais obligatoire à l’essentiel, mais certains tableaux sont déjà périmés, notamment suite à la l’antenne du SCA installée au banc epuis le 6 septembre 2013, date de l’entrée en vigueur de la nou- publication du décret du 9 mai 2017... d’épreuve de Saint-Étienne. Cela velle réglementation des armes, inspirée du modèle européen, le ne toucherait donc pas seulement classement s’effectuait désormais en 4 catégories : A (interdic- l’occasion de la publication au J.O. les armes fabriquées en France ou Dtion), B (autorisation), C (déclaration) et D (enregistrement ou libre). Aussi, de nouveaux textes... Il est à noter importées d’un pays hors CIP, mais il n’existe parfois aucune équivalence directe, que ce soit à cause de la que cet organigramme se retrouve toutes les nouvelles armes mises disparition de la notion d’arme “de guerre”, de l’introduction d’une liste de aussi sous une forme quelque peu sur le marché (hors stocks déjà en “calibres maudits”, ou encore de la prise en compte de nouveaux critères de différente sur le site personnel de possession des importateurs ou des dangerosité..
  • Tactical Employment of Nonlethal Weapons

    Tactical Employment of Nonlethal Weapons

    NLW MULTI-SERVICE TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES FOR THE TACTICAL EMPLOYMENT OF NONLETHAL WEAPONS FM 3-22.40 MCWP 3-15.8 NTTP 3-07.3.2 AFTTP(I) 3-2.45 October 2007 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Distribution authorized to US Government agencies and their contractors only to protect technical or operational information from automatic dissemination under the International Exchange Program or by other means. This determination was made on 15 Nov 2006. Other requests will be referred to: HQ TRADOC, ATTN: ATFC-EJ, Ft Monroe, VA 23651-1067; HQ MCCDC, ATTN: C427, Quantico, VA 22134-5021; NWDC, ATTN: N5, Newport, RI 02841-1207; or AFDDEC, ATTN: DD, Maxwell AFB, 36112-6112. DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document. This publication contains copyright material. See figure III-6. FOREWORD This publication has been prepared under our direction for use by our respective commands and other commands as appropriate. BARBARA G. FAST ANDREW W. O’DONNELL, JR. Major General, US Army Brigadier General (Sel), US Marine Corps Deputy Director/Chief of Staff, Director Army Capabilities Integration Center Capabilities Development Directorate CARLTON B. JEWETT ALLEN G. PECK Rear Admiral, US Navy Major General, US Air Force Commander Commander Navy Warfare Development Command Air Force Doctrine Development and Education Center This publication is available through the ALSA Web site (www.alsa.mil); through the Army at Army Knowledge Online (AKO) (www.us.army.mil) and at the General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library (www.train.army.mil) Web sites; and through the Air Force at the Air Force Publishing Web site (www.e-publishing.af.mil).
  • Saint Lucia Country Report

    Saint Lucia Country Report

    SALW Guide Global distribution and visual identification Saint Lucia Country report https://salw-guide.bicc.de Weapons Distribution SALW Guide Weapons Distribution The following list shows the weapons which can be found in Saint Lucia and whether there is data on who holds these weapons: M203 grenade launcher G Mossberg 500 U Explanation of symbols Country of origin Licensed production Production without a licence G Government: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is held by Governmental agencies. N Non-Government: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is held by non-Governmental armed groups. U Unspecified: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is found in the country, but do not specify whether it is held by Governmental agencies or non-Governmental armed groups. It is entirely possible to have a combination of tags beside each country. For example, if country X is tagged with a G and a U, it means that at least one source of data identifies Governmental agencies as holders of weapon type Y, and at least one other source confirms the presence of the weapon in country X without specifying who holds it. Note: This application is a living, non-comprehensive database, relying to a great extent on active contributions (provision and/or validation of data and information) by either SALW experts from the military and international renowned think tanks or by national and regional focal points of small arms control entities. 2 salw-guide.bicc.de SALW Guide M203 grenade launcher The M203 grenade launcher was intended to be used as close fire support for point and group area targets.