Peter's Dragoons: How the Russians Won at Poltava Author(S): Donald Ostrowski Source: Harvard Ukrainian Studies, Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peter's Dragoons: How the Russians Won at Poltava Author(S): Donald Ostrowski Source: Harvard Ukrainian Studies, Vol The President and Fellows of Harvard College Peter's Dragoons: How the Russians Won at Poltava Author(s): Donald Ostrowski Source: Harvard Ukrainian Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1/4, POLTAVA 1709: THE BATTLE AND THE MYTH (2009-2010), pp. 81-106 Published by: Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41756498 . Accessed: 19/04/2013 04:27 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute and The President and Fellows of Harvard College are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Harvard Ukrainian Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 195.209.247.163 on Fri, 19 Apr 2013 04:27:21 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Peter's Dragoons: How the Russians Won at Poltava Donald Ostrowski T he conventional portrayal ofthe militaryreforms of Peter I (1682- 1725)depicts his inheritinga woefully out-of-date army and bringingit up to Europeanstandards of the time. In theprocess, according to thisconventional portrayal,Peter reorganized the militaryand rationalizedthe recruitment process,which before had been haphazardand resultedin undermannedregi- ments.Accordingly, an importantstep was to disbandin 1698 the rebellious strel'tsy, who are seen as a throwbackto theold Muscovitearmy. The battles of Narva (1700) and Poltava (1709) are considered,by those who hold the conventionalview, as theprogress markers of the reform process. The Battleof Narvapurportedly came beforePeter's updating reforms had a chanceto take hold;thus, resulting in a humiliatingloss againsta Europeanarmy. By 1709, however,the Europeanizingreforms of the militarysupposedly had timeto takeeffect, and theRussian army won a significantvictory that finally placed Russiain theranks of European great powers.1 As deeplyembedded in thehistoriography and durableas thisconventional portrayalhas been,it is notcorroborated by the evidence. The Europeanization ofthe Russian army had beengoing on moreor less continuously since the early 1650s.Peter's supposed "dissolution of thestrel'tsy" in 1698-99 involvedthe executionof 799 membersof two strel'tsy regiments for leaving their assigned postin VelikieLuki and marchingto Moscow to demandback payand to see theirwives and families.2Many of the 49 regimentsof strel'tsythat existed in 1698 alreadyhad Europeancommand structures, and over the nexttwo decades mostwere gradually transformed into infantry regiments, but a few remainedas garrisontroops until the 1730s.3 Some researcherswho are aware ofthe extentto whichthe Russianarmy had been Europeanizedby the time Petercame to power have looked forother explanations for the victoryof theRussian forces at Poltava.Carol B. Stevens,for one, remarkedthat "given currentresearch, it seems certain that Peter's self-consciously 'Europeanizing' reformsneither completely transformed the Russianarmy, nor were those This content downloaded from 195.209.247.163 on Fri, 19 Apr 2013 04:27:21 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 82 OSTROWSKI reformsalone responsiblefor that army's victories over Sweden up to and includingPoltava (1709)" Instead,she creditedthose victories to "theskillful use ofdiplomacy to improvethe battle conditions for his militaryforces and the successfulcombination of new tacticsand organizationfrom northern Europewith experience and knowledgefrom the southeastern part of the Euro- Ottomanzone."4 Nicholas A. Dorrellcharacterized as "perhapsflawed" the conventional"view of the Russian army at this time. [as] thisold fashionedand rawarmy [that] was transformedinto an experienced,modern fighting force thatwon at Poltavaduring the course of the war."5 He proposed,instead, that amongthe Russians"there was a growingrealisation that Western methods werenot alwaysappropriate or indeedsuccessful [because] [a]11 armies that foughtthe Swedes usingWestern methods had majorproblems coping with themand usuallylost!" While acknowledgingthat the Russianarmy "had a deep knowledgeof the Swedish methods of warfare and howto defeat"them, Dorrellproposed that "during the period 1701 to 1706the Russians gradually turnedaway from the Western methods they were using at thestart of the war to a homeproduced system that was designedto fitthe nature of the Russian army,the area itwould fight in and to cope withthe challenge of the Swedish methodsof fighting."6 Much in Steven'sand Dorrell'sassessments are valid. The Russiancom- mandwas awareof Ottoman military strategy and tactics,and had acquireda profoundknowledge of Swedish methods of war in generaland themethods ofCharles XII (1697-1718)in particular.The Russiansalso made use ofsteppe methodsof warfare in following a "scorched earth" policy to hinderthe Swedish advancein 1708-9. But the majordifference between the Russianarmy that besiegedthe fortress at Narvain 1700and theRussian army at Poltavain 1709 was thelarge number of dragoon regiments that Peter ordered to be recruited and trained.These regimentsproved a matchfor the Swedishdragoon and cavalryregiments on whichCharles XII relied.I hypothesizethat they allowed the Russians'superiority in infantrynumbers and artilleryto prevailat Pol- tava as theycould not at Narva. To be sure,in December1708, Peter issued an administrativemilitary decree reorganizingthe countryinto eight large gubernias,7as well as requiringthe recruitment of one male forevery twenty householdsin thecountryside, but neitherof these had anydirect impact on the Russians'victory at Poltava.Instead, the fast-movingdragoon regiments and mountedinfantry (Peter's "flying corps") were well suitedto the open easternEuropean terrain and could be used to harrythe Swedishadvance, entergaps in theenemy line in battle,and close gapsin theRussian line before theSwedish army could takeadvantage of them. In 1991,Russell E Weigley,who has beendescribed as "thedean of American militaryhistory,"8 wrote an analyticalnarrative of European battles from 1631 to 1815.9In his book,Weigley stated that battles were sought "to securedeci- This content downloaded from 195.209.247.163 on Fri, 19 Apr 2013 04:27:21 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions peter's dragoons 83 sionsin war...with a quicknessand dispatchthat would keep the costs of war reasonablyproportionate to the purposesattained."10 According to Weigley, battleswere not decisivein determiningpolitical or militaryoutcomes. Even whena battlewas tacticallydecisive, it was neverstrategically or politicallyso. JohnChilds criticized Weigley for not providing a definitionof what he meant by "decisive."11But Weigleydid providesuch a definition:"If in a successful battlethe enemy army could be substantiallydestroyed. ..then the whole course ofa war mightbe resolvedin a singleday, and warsthereby might be won at relativelylow costs,by avoidingthe prolongedexpenditure of resourcesand lives." Nonetheless,in Weigley's estimation,this era was "an age of prolonged, indecisivewars, wars sufficientlyinterminable that again and again the toll in lives,not to mentionthe costs in materialresources, rose grotesquelyout of proportionto anythingtheir authors could hope to gain fromthem."12 As such,he challengedthe premiseof von Clausewitzthat "war is merelythe continuationof policyby othermeans."13 Weigley wrote that "the chronic indecisivenessof war from the seventeenth through the early nineteenth cen- turies,wars chronicinability to attainthe ends desired...made warfarenot a worthyinstrument of policy but an expressionof the bankruptcy of policy."14 He describedthe serious limitations on armiesat thetime. These limitations, in thewords of Allan R. Millett,were "the lack ofa professionalofficer corps, logisticalscarcity and poor planning,the pitiful condition of European roads and maps,ordnance of dubious effectiveness, the immobilityof infantry and the erraticuse of cavalry(especially in the exploitationphase of battle),and muddledpolitical direction and coalitioncooperation."15 In hisbook Weigley also proposedfour "further themes": (1) military"[o]ffi- cershipcame increasinglyto be based on standardsof educationand social responsibility"(xiii); (2) the"difficulties ofcommand, control, and communi- cationin earlymodern war did muchto reducestill further the potentialfor battleto achieveits strategic purposes, the destruction of the enemy and the rapidwinning of wars" (xiv); (3) battlesfought mainly with infantry during "theage of battles"were usuallytactically indecisive, and "a mobilecombat arm"(namely, "an effectivecavalry") was needed ifany tactical decisiveness wereto be achieved(xiv-xv, 263); and (4) "limitationsupon the violenceof war throughthe restraintsof internationallaw and custom"such that"the principleof noncombatantimmunity within the war conventionhad by the earlytwentieth century largely come to protectthe lives and eventhe private propertyof noncombatants from the violence of war, by confining legitimate violenceto combatantswho could possess some capacity to protectthemselves and to retaliate"(xv). Among the battles Weigley described is Poltava.But his descriptionof that battle focused on theinfantry and on Charles'sinability
Recommended publications
  • In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire
    ANTHONY CROSS In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of The Russian Empire (1613-1917) OpenBook Publishers To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/268 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917) Anthony Cross http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2014 Anthony Cross The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt it and to make commercial use of it providing that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Cross, Anthony, In the Land of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917), Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/ OBP.0042 Please see the list of illustrations for attribution relating to individual images. Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omissions or errors will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. As for the rights of the images from Wikimedia Commons, please refer to the Wikimedia website (for each image, the link to the relevant page can be found in the list of illustrations).
    [Show full text]
  • Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc
    Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] La Journee De Poltawa En Ukraine le 8e. julliet 1709; Entre l'Armee de sa Majeste Suedoise Charles XII, et celle de sa Majeste Csarienne Pierre I, Empereur de la grande Russie . 1714 Stock#: 29171 Map Maker: de Fer Date: 1714 Place: Paris Color: Hand Colored Condition: VG Size: 13.5 x 9 inches Price: SOLD Description: Detailed plan of the Battle of Poltava. The Battle of Poltava fought on June 27-28, 1709 was the decisive victory of Peter I of Russia over Charles XII of Sweden in the most famous of the battles of the Great Northern War. While the date given on the map reflects a July 8, 1709 battle, the modern date is given as June 27-28. After the Battle of Narva in 1700, Czar Peter I was reorganized his army, while Charles XII of Sweden fought for 6 years against Augustus II of Saxony-Poland. Peter first offensive move with his reorganized Russian Army was to establish the city of Saint Petersburg in Swedish territory. Charles attacked the Russian heartland with the intent on an assault on Moscow from Poland. The Swedish army of almost 44,000 men left Saxony on August 22, 1707 and marched eastwards. When they reached the Vistula River and crossed on December 30, then continued through Masuria and took Grodno on January 28, 1708. The Swedes continued to the area around Smorgon and Minsk ,where the army went into winter quarters.
    [Show full text]
  • © Copyright 2020 Oksana Mykhed “A Plague on Your Borders:” Disease
    1 “A Plague on Your Borders:” Disease Control and Administrative Reforms in Late Eighteenth-Century Ukraine Oksana Mykhed Devastated and unexplored, welcoming and opened to a stranger, – these were the characteristics a traveler would give to the land and people living in late eighteenth-century Ukraine. Danylo Samoilovych, a Ukrainian surgeon who advanced his medical career in the Russian Empire, left a similar impression of the region in his writings.1 Exhausted and ill after his prolonged service in the army battling in the Russo-Ottoman war, Samoilovych travelled from Moldavia to St. Petersburg in late spring – early summer of 1770. To reach the imperial capital, the physician crossed Polish and Russian-controlled territories in Ukraine right before a severe outbreak of bubonic plague in Kyiv that occurred in 1770–71. The outbreak that began in the Polish Ukraine, spread to Kyiv, and struck many towns and villages in Left-Bank Ukraine was the largest documented epidemic of the pestilence in the region in the eighteenth century. Samoilovych’s rare eye-witness traveler’s account confirmed that the Kyiv medical tragedy was both predictable and inevitable. The physician witnessed that the plague was already terrorizing small towns and villages in Right-Bank Ukraine several months before the catastrophe in Kyiv and was among the first medical observers who connected the tragedy to unregulated population movement and lack of special medical precautions organized by the governments in the two banks of Ukraine. 2 1 The work and life of Danylo Samoilovych [or Danila Samoilovich in some sources] did not attract much scholarly attention.
    [Show full text]
  • NARRATING the NATIONAL FUTURE: the COSSACKS in UKRAINIAN and RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK a DISSERTATION Prese
    NARRATING THE NATIONAL FUTURE: THE COSSACKS IN UKRAINIAN AND RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Comparative Literature and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Anna Kovalchuk Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Comparative Literature by: Katya Hokanson Chairperson Michael Allan Core Member Serhii Plokhii Core Member Jenifer Presto Core Member Julie Hessler Institutional Representative and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2017 ii © 2017 Anna Kovalchuk iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Anna Kovalchuk Doctor of Philosophy Department of Comparative Literature June 2017 Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation investigates nineteenth-century narrative representations of the Cossacks—multi-ethnic warrior communities from the historical borderlands of empire, known for military strength, pillage, and revelry—as contested historical figures in modern identity politics. Rather than projecting today’s political borders into the past and proceeding from the claim that the Cossacks are either Russian or Ukrainian, this comparative project analyzes the nineteenth-century narratives that transform pre- national Cossack history into national patrimony. Following the Romantic era debates about national identity in the Russian empire, during which the Cossacks become part of both Ukrainian and Russian national self-definition, this dissertation focuses on the role of historical narrative in these burgeoning political projects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annals of UVAN, Vol. IV-V, Summer-Fall
    EDITORIAL COMMITTEE DM ITRY ČIŽEVSKY Haward University OLEKSANDER GRANOVSKY University of Minnesota ROMAN SMAL STOCKI Marquette University VOLODYMYR P. TIMOSHENKO Stanford University EDITOR MICHAEL VETUKHIV Columbia University TECHNICAL EDITOR HENRY M. NEBEL, J r. The Annals of the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U. S. are published quarterly by the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U.S., Inc. A Special issue will take place of 2 issues. All correspondence, orders, and remittances should be sent to The Annals of the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U. S. 11 У- West 26th Street, New York 10, N. Y. PRICE OF THIS ISSUE: $5.00 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION PRICE: J6.00 A special rate is offered to libraries and graduate and undergraduate students in the fields of Slavic studies. Copyright 1955, by the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U.S., Inc. THE ANNALS of the UKRAINIAN ACADEMY of Arts and Sciences in the U. S. Vol. IV-V Sum m er-Fall, 1955 No. 4 (14)-1 (15) Special Issue THE SETTLEMENT OF THE SOUTHERN UKRAINE (1750-1775) N. D. Polons’ka -Vasylenko Published by THE UKRAINIAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES IN T H E U.S., Inc. New York 1955 THE ANNALS OF THE UKRAINIAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES IN THE U. S., INC. S p e c i a l I s s u e CONTENTS page Introduction .................................................................................. 1 P a r t O n e COLONIZATION OF NOVA SERBIYA AND SLAVYAN OSERBIYA I. The Return of the Zaporozhians to their “Free Lands” .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pushkin, Alexander. Poltava, Trans. Ivan Eubanks. Pushkin Review 11 (2008): 129-71
    http://www.pushkiniana.org This document was originally printed in the Pushkin Review / Пушкинский вестник, the annual journal of the North American Pushkin Society, produced in cooperation with the International Pushkin Society and published by Slavica Publishers. This material is under copyright and is the intellectual property of its author. It may not be printed, reproduced or distributed in any form without consent of the author. Citation: Pushkin, Alexander. Poltava, trans. Ivan Eubanks. Pushkin Review 11 (2008): 129-71. < http://www.pushkiniana.org/vol11-newtranslations/22- eubanks-translation11.html>. Slavica Publishers Indiana University 2611 East 10th Street Bloomington, IN 47408-2603 +1 (812) 856-4186 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.slavica.com http://www.pushkiniana.org New Translations Новые переводы Poltava by Alexander Pushkin* Translated by Ivan Eubanks The power and the glory of the war, Faithless as their vain votaries, men, Had passed to the triumphant Czar. Byron Dedication To you — but can the somber muse’s Voice ever hope to touch your ear? And could your modest soul perceive The aspirations of my heart? 5 Or will a poet’s dedication, As once upon a time his love, Extend to you and lack reply, To pass you by still unacknowledged? But recognize, at least, those sounds 10 That were, at one time, dear to you; And think, that on our day of parting, Wherever fickle fate may lead me, Your melancholy wilderness, The last I’ll hear of your sweet voice, 15 Shall be my only treasured idol, My soul’s one solitary love. Canto the First The rich and glorious Kochubey:1 * Footnotes to this translation are from Pushkin’s original notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500-1700
    Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700 In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries Muscovy waged a costly struggle against the Crimean Khanate, the Ottoman Empire, and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth for control of the fertile steppe above the Black Sea. This was a region of great strategic and economic importance – arguably the pivot of Eurasia at the time. Yet, this crucial period in Russia’s history has, up until now, been neglected by historians. Brian L. Davies’s study provides an essential insight into the emergence of Russia as a great power. The long campaign took a great toll upon Russia’s population, economy, and institutions, and repeatedly frustrated or redefi ned Russian military and diplo- matic projects in the West. The struggle was every bit as important as Russia’s wars in northern and central Europe for driving the Russian state-building process, forcing military reform and shaping Russia’s visions of Empire. Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700 examines the course of this struggle and explains how Russia’s ultimate prevalence resulted from new strategies of military colonization in addition to improvements in army command-and-control, logistics, and tactics. Brian L. Davies is Associate Professor of History at the University of Texas at San Antonio. His publications include State Power and Community in Early Modern Russia: The Case of Kozlov, 1635–1649 (2004). Warfare and History General Editor Jeremy Black Professor of History, University of Exeter Air Power in the Age of Total War Modern Chinese Warfare, Warfare in Atlantic Africa, 1500– John Buckley 1795–1989 1800: Maritime Confl icts and the Bruce A.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter the Great by the Same Author
    ^^ 0% PETER THE GREAT BY THE SAME AUTHOR. In one volume, large Crown Svo, cloth, 6.v. ea< II IK ROMANCE OF AN EMPRESS (Catherine n. OF Russia). With a Portrait. The Times, — 'This book is based on the confessions of the I it ol mpress herself ; gives striking pictures the condition of the contemporary Russia which she did so much to mould as well as to expand. Few stories in history are more romantic than that of Catherine u. of Russia, with its mysterious incidents ami curious thrilling episodes ; few characters present more problems.' THE STORY OF A THRONE (Catherine ii. ov Russia). Willi a Portrait. The World. — ' No novel that ever was written could compete withthishistoiir.il monograph in absorbing interest.' London: WILLIAM HEINEMANN, 21 Bedford Stree 1 , \\ .C. D ETER THE GREAT BY K WALISZEWSKI AUTHOR OF ' THE ROMANCE OJ AN EMPRESS ' ' 'THE STOKY Or A THRONE, El I . Translatedfrom the French By LAD V MA RY LO YD Ulith a portrait IX TWO VOLUMES VOL. II. LONDON WILLIAM HE I N EM ANN 1897 All rights it se> ved '31 WI7 WOR57r-Vyi »^6.5^. • CONTENTS PART III—HIS WORK BOOK I —EXTERNAL STRUGGLE—WAR AND DIPLOMACY i ~~*>/\ 1 PAGE I T £,">-/ I. FROM NARVA TO P0LT7 "\, 1 700-1 709, . 3 II. FROM THE BALTIC TO THE CASPIAN, 39 — III. THE APOGEE FRANCE, 70 "V BOOK II —THE INTERNAL STRUGGLE—THE REFORMS — END OF :'HE STRELTSY- ^RYl'HE NEW REGIME THE ST. PETERSBURG, .... 104 II. MORALS—HABITS AND CUSTOMS, '25 V III. THE ECCLESIASTICAL REFORMS AND THE SUPPRESSION OF THE PATRIARCHATE, ^Vy/XVJV^ - • 153 >/7v> THE SOCIAL REFORM—THE TABLE OF RANKS, .
    [Show full text]
  • Final Playbook
    PLAYBOOK Table of Contents A. Scenarios ................................................................................................ 2 B. Extended Example of Play .................................................................... 6 C. Historical Background of the Great Northern War ........................... 15 D. Designers’ Notes .................................................................................... 27 E. Developer’s Notes .................................................................................. 28 F. Players’ Notes ......................................................................................... 30 G. Gazetteer ................................................................................................ 32 GMT Games, LLC • P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 www.GMTGames.com 2 Pax Baltica Playbook On what Foundation stands the Warrior’s Pride? How just his Hopes let Swedish Charles decide; A. Scenarios A Frame of Adamant, a Soul of Fire, Place blocks in the territories indicated in the scenario’s set-up, No Dangers fright him, and no Labours tire; at full strength unless otherwise indicated. Each nation controls Over Love, over Force, extends his wide Domain, all their own national-colored territories, unless a different na- Unconquered Lord of Pleasure and of Pain; tion’s garrison is listed. No Joys to him pacific Sceptres yield, War sounds the Trump, he rushes to the Field; A.1 NEXT STOP MOSCOW (1707-1710) Behold surrounding Kings their Power combine, And One capitulate, and One resign; Karl XII has reached the peak of his power. The Russian army has Peace courts his Hand, but spread her Charms in vain; been defeated and Denmark is out of the war. August II has lost the “Think Nothing gained, he cries, till nought remain, Polish crown to the Swedish puppet Stanisław Leszczyński and Karl “On Moscow’s Walls till Gothic Standards fly, occupies the Saxon fatherland. However, Pyotr I has begun to reform “And all is Mine beneath the Polar Sky.” his army and is ready to take up the fight again.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Self-Archived Version of an Original Article. This Version May Differ from the Original in Pagination and Typographic Details
    This is a self-archived version of an original article. This version may differ from the original in pagination and typographic details. Author(s): Sarkamo, Ville Title: Warrior Values in Carolean Society : The Role of Fighting in the Worldview of the Eighteenth-Century Swedish Officers Year: 2014 Version: Copyright: © Sarkamo & © Försvarshögskolan, 2014. Rights: In Copyright Rights url: http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en Please cite the original version: Sarkamo, V. (2014). Warrior Values in Carolean Society : The Role of Fighting in the Worldview of the Eighteenth-Century Swedish Officers. Militärhistorisk tidskrift, 2014 (1), 59-81. DRAFT VERSION Warrior Values in Carolean Society – Role of fighting in the Worldview of Early- Eighteenth-Century Swedish Officers Ville Sarkamo1 Introduction – Honour and Role of Fighting Honour through participating in war, fighting and battles were important parts of societies and culture in Early Modern Europe. From the point of history of mentalities wars were most important to the world-views of military personel in the Swedish case, officers of the Carolean army (karoliner). During the Great Northern War (1700–1721) Charles XII had led the main Swedish forces to victory after victory. Many of his men were part of a proud victorious army with highly militaristic ideals. This all ended after a disastrous battle of Poltava 1709. Thirty thousand Swedes ended up as prisoners of war in distant Russia after a humiliating parade in Moscow. For the next twelve years, they languished in captivity and were joined by even more prisoners from the Baltic provinces and Finland.2 The glory of the victorious army was past, but the role of honour was still present in contemporary in societies, but now in a new harsh manner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annals of UVAN, Vol. VI, 1958, No. 3-4 (21-22)
    THE CONSTITUTION OF PYLYP ORLYK* MYKOLA VASYLENKO The decision reached by Hetman Mazepa along with certain high-ranking Ukrainian officers and Cossack-Zaporozhians in 1708 to ally themselves with the Swedish King, is one of the episodes of Ukrainian history that is neither clearly under­ stood nor thoroughly studied. Because conditions have been unfavorable, much of the background is still unknown and no research has been done. The most important documents are probably lost. Some may have been destroyed immediately by Hetman Mazepa himself as a quite understandable precau­ tion. His negotations with Poland and Sweden had evidently been carried on in utmost secrecy; at any moment they could have been detected by the Russian Government and have caus­ ed an official inquiry. Under such conditions no written doc­ uments that could serve as evidence would have been kept. Very important secret documents had been burnt by Piper, First Secretary of State of Charles XII, near Poltava on the eve of the day he gave himself up as a prisoner to the Rus­ sians.1 One may guess that among these papers were the doc­ uments referring to the negotiations between the Swedish Gov­ ernment and the Ukraine. Piper naturally did not want these documents to fall into the hands of the Russian gov­ ernment and thus reveal other more important plans and in­ tents, as well as disclose a wider circle of the officers who had participated in this plot. * This is a reprint from Uchenye Zapiski Instituta istorii RANHON, Moscow 1929, Vol. IV, pp. 153-171, and is printed as one in the series of translations of Ukrainian source material (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2015 by Steve Fratt
    T H E L O C A L NEWSLETTER F O R T H E HMGS-Midwest M I N I A T U R E W A R G A M I N G ENTHUSIAST VOLUME 6 ISSUE 1 SPRING/SUMMER - 2 0 1 5 BOD Update - Fall 2015 by Steve Fratt Greetings fellow wargam- from time to time at the means HMGS-Midwest ers and historians! Chez Hanson. will have a presence in The Civil War reenacting Wisconsin and Indiana. community in Chicago has How about Michigan, Io- wrapped up its 150th Anni- wa, Ohio, and Minnesota? INSIDE THIS versary season of the Civil If you know of a good sized convention needing ISSUE: War out at the Dollinger Farm in Minooka, Il. We some premium games, let BOD Update 1 did Sailor’s Creek on Sat- us know. urday and Appomattox on LW 2016 2 Sunday. I designed the Since 2016 is the anniver- Update scenarios and commanded sary of the Alamo, my the Federal forces. It original intention was to Great North- 4 would be interesting some- run a 3mm/6mm Alamo ern War day to engage in a hybrid game at Little Wars this action of some sort. We coming year. Then I went Membership 11 have had reenactors come to the Chicago Toy Soldier Rewards to the Lincolnshire Little Show and I am now work- Wars and we are seeing Kevin Cabai [with Lor- ing on a special pair of HMGS-MW 15 raine] and I have been games just for Little Wars. Events what we can do to have a variety of reenactors come busy promoting HMGS- I am calling them the to the Westin for Little Midwest at Gen Con Indy “President’s Games - Fif- BoD Update 17 Wars 2016.
    [Show full text]