Status of the Umbelliferae Ssp. in Russia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Status of the Umbelliferae Ssp. in Russia Status of the Umbelliferae ssp. in Russia Tatiana Khmelinskaya Olga Zvereva Anna Artemyeva The collection status The formation of Russian Umbelliferae collection had begun in 1923 after N.I.Vavilov visit West-European countries, USA and Canada (1921- 1922), from the seed samples shipped by breeding companies of the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Austria. Russian resources were registered in VIR collection through All-Russian agricultural exhibition. The local landraces were collected during collection missions in Afghanistan, Iran, Armenia, Uzbekistan, Turkey, etc. In 1926 VIR scientists started to study the collection. From 1928 the new expeditions were arranged to Mediterranean countries, Ethiopia, and Western China by Vavilov, to India by Markovich, to Minor Asia of Zhukovskiy, etc. , and also collection had started to grow by exchange of material with different Institutes and companies. Now VIR Genebank contains genetic resources of different status from more than 90 countries, includes wild species, landraces, old and advanced cultivars, hybrids F1, breeding materials . Umbelliferae collections are divided into two parts: constant (base) catalogue and temporary catalogue. The constant catalogue includes landraces and breeding cultivars with sufficient quantity of seeds in accession. All accessions of constant catalogue are documented for computerized passport data. The temporary catalogue includes the hybrids F1, breeding materials and the samples with insufficient quantity of seeds. These latter cultivars need to be regenerated and then they will be included in constant catalogue. Passport data of these accessions are stored in our documents. Umbelliferae in VIR collection Daucus carota L., Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Hoffm., Apium graveolens L., Anethum graveolens L., Coriandrum sativum L., Pastinaca sativa L., Carum carvi L., Carum ajowan Baill., Chaerophyllum aureum L., Chaerophyllum bulbosum L., Anthriscus cerefolium (L.) Hoffm., Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Ammi majus L., Ammi visnaga (L.) Lam., Ammi sp., Pimpinella anisum L., Pimpinella saxifrage L., Pimpinella sp., Critmum maritimum L., Levisticum officinale W.D.J.Koch, Myrrhis odorata (L.) Scop., Sium sisarum L., Sium latifolium L., Angelica archangelica L., Cuminum cyminum L., Meum athamanticum Jacg., Smyrnium olusatrum L., Arracacia purpusii Bancr., Ferula assa-foetida L., Cryptotaenia canadensis DC. Status of the collection accessions Genus Common Cultivars Land- Breeding Wild Total name races lines accessions Anethum L. Dill 63 748 - - 811 Apium L Celery 418 162 - - 580 Carum L. Caraway, 15 185 1 45 246 ajowan Anthriscus Pers. Chervil 12 3 - 2 17 Coriandrum L. Coriander 21 561 4 - 586 Daucus sp.. Wild species - - - 35 35 Daucus carota L. Carrot 2922 84 61 - 3067 Foeniculum Miller Fennel 48 182 12 15 257 Pastiniaca L. Parsnip 90 1 - - 91 Petroselinum Parsley 311 114 - - 425 Hoffm. Other Umbelliferae 5 62 1 20 88 crops TOTAL 3905 2102 79 117 6203 Carrot collection represents all known intraspecific diversity of cultivated carrot which according to the classification of Sechkarev (1971) and Sazonova (1990) includes three subspecies, four varietal groups and 11 varieties. Taxonomic names No. of accessions A. subsp. gingidium (L.) Small 1 B. subsp. carota I. convar. carota 10 II. convar. sativus (Hoffm.) Setch. 1. var. sativus 23 2. var. sulfureus Alef. 22 3. var. atrorubrus Alef. 1 4. var. aurantuus Alef. 865 C. subsp. orientalis (Rubasch.) Setch. III. convar. orientalis 11 IV. convar. afghanicus 5. var. afghanicus 2 6. var. shavrovii Mazk. 25 7. var. setcharevii Sazon. 1 8. var. zhukowskii (Mazk.) Setch. 21 9. var. roseus Mazk. 1 10. var. boissiehi (Schweinf) Mazk. 10 11. var. vavilovii Mazk. 8 Safety duplication and storage At present, the base collection is preserved for long-term storage at – 100C in the VIR Genebank and duplicated in medium-term storage at +40C in glass jars in the National Seed Storage at the Kuban experiment station (Krasnodar region). The active working collection is stored at a room temperature in St. Petersburg at the Department of vegetable and cucurbits crops. Duplicate active collection is placed for short-term storage at +40C in VIR-Centre. Seed samples for long-term storage are dried until seed moisture content of 2-6% is reached, and packed in laminated aluminum bags. Storage of roots Regeneration at Majkop station Isolation cabin at Pushkin station Plots for regeneration at Dagestan station Utilisation of germplasm Total Common Distributed in Distributed Genus distributed name Russia abroad 2002-2012 Anethum L. Dill 180 125 55 Apium L. Celery 160 130 30 Carum L. Caraway, 51 28 23 ajowan Anthriscus Pers. Chervil 22 21 1 Coriandrum L. Coriander 341 245 96 Daucus L. Carrot 1563 817 746 Foeniculum Miller Fennel 103 23 80 Pastiniaca L. Parsnip 67 53 14 Petroselinum Hoffm. Parsley 171 136 35 Other Umbelliferae crops 70 65 5 Total 2728 1643 1085 Status of documentation Genus Common Total Passport Evaluation/ Seed in Regeneration name number of data Characteri long-term 2009-2012 accessions zation storage Apium L. Celery 580 155 211 112 150 Carum L. Caraway 246 48 20 29 47 Anthriscus Pers. Chervil 17 17 5 12 11 Coriandrum L. Coriander 586 339 100 313 458 Daucus L. Carrot 3102 1001 2105 698 952 Foeniculum Miller Fennel 257 126 30 92 153 Pastinaca L. Parsnip 91 38 49 48 76 Petroselinum Parsley 425 66 198 215 130 Hoffm. Other Umbelliferae 88 30 10 10 44 crops Total 5392 1820 2728 1529 2021 Characterization and evaluation Most accessions of Umbelliferae collections have been characterized and evaluated for 50-54 morphological, biological and agronomic traits at 7 experimental stations in different ecologo-geographical zones of Russia. The accessions have been studied using the same standardized research methods for three years to test adaptive capacity. The part of the accessions had been tested on resistance to diseases and insects and biochemical composition of consumption plant parts. Evaluation data are stored in summary journals and in separate computerized files. The data have been systematized in Methodic Indications (1976, 1990), evaluation catalogues for breeders. The Vavilov Institute regularly publishes Delectus seminum where all available accessions for exchange are given. As results of more than 80-years ecologo-geographical characterization and evaluation of carrot collection morpho- physiological differentiation was done and large VIR collection was divided into groups and types. European carotene carrot cultivars has represented by such cultivar types as 'Flakker', 'Chantenay', 'Amsterdam', 'Berlicumer', 'Nantes‘ and 'Karotel‘ . Central Asian yellow, pink and orange carrot forms are characterized by high levels of earliness, drought resistance and cold hardiness. There is a group of high-yielding cultivars for different regions of Russia and the republics of the Community of Independent States (CIS). There are non-boltering varieties adapted to long days. Each of these cultivar types is characterized by a comparatively stable set of morphological traits of leaf and root. Extremely great variability is observed in commercial and biological characters of cultivars, which have been conditioned by different geographic and ecological cultivation environments. In Russia carrots are reported to be afflicted by 26 forms of fungal, bacterial and viral diseases, five species of insects and five species of nematodes. The most harmful carrot diseases are bacteriosis (Erwinia carotovora (Jon.) HolL), storage rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiniorum (Lib.) et By.), black rot {Alternaria radicinia M.D. et E.), grey rot (Botritis cinerea Pers.) and phomosis (Phoma rostupii Saer). In Northwest Russia carrots are subject to considerable attacks from the carrot leaf hopper (Trioza viridula) and rust-fly (Psylla rosae F.). Cultivars manifest strong differentiation in their reaction to fungal and bacterial diseases. No carrot forms with high resistance to pests have been identified. 2008 2009 2011 Disease R, % C, % R, % С, % R, % С, % Black rot 47,2±1,6 32,2±1,6 19,9±0,8 17,9±0,3 21,1±0,1 13,6±0,1 Grey rot 9,6±2,3 3,1±1,2 4,9±0,9 4,9±0,9 3,8±0,7 3,9±0,7 Phomosis 8,6±1,0 7,9±1,0 8,5±0,9 7,8±0,9 2,6±0,4 2,4±0,4 Bacteriosis 4,6±1,4 3,8±1,1 17,0±1,9 16,7±1,8 1,9±0,4 1,7±0,4 Storage rot 0,6±0,4 0,4±0,3 0,9±0,6 0,9±0,6 1,0±0,3 0,9±0,3 Fusarium 0,5±0,5 0,5±0,4 1,3±0,4 1,0±0,4 0,9±0,3 0,8±0,3 R – distribution of disease, C – level of development Biochemical analysis Food nutrition is becoming one of the most important factors in the choice of products in modern conditions. Umbelliferae vegetables are characterized by high water content, low caloric value, contain high quality protein, carbohydrates, fibre, vitamins, minerals. Carrot cultivars show high differentiation in the content of chemical components: dry matter, 10-13%; total sugars, 5-6.5%; ascorbic acid, 1-11 mg/100 g; carotene, from 0 to 20-25 mg/100g. Biochemical compounds in carrot roots of different cultivar types depending on time of storage 14 13 17 12 16 11 Амагер 15 10 Амстердамская Амагер 9 Берликумер 14 Амстердамская Берликумер 8 Нантская 13 Нантская Шантенэ каротин, мг/100г каротин, 7 Шантенэ сухое вещество, % сухое вещество, 6 12 5 11 4 10 1 2 3 1 2 3 сроки сроки Dry matter content Carotene content 30 20 10 0 НИИОХ 336 Местная Каротин, мг/100г Каротин, Поврежденность листоблошкой (балл) в фазе уборки Бобруйская с высоким моркови сорта Выделенные Ленинаканская Местная желтая Местная Amro каротина содержанием Rona Courte … carrot carotene Asmer Early … Campestra Flakkese E-1095 F1 leaf Amsterdam… content of withhigh cultivars Carrot Chanta Karotka hopper Nantesi DC-21279 a Berlicumer … nd resistance resistance to nd Hybrid AV-7901 Carrot NVH-1001 15 10 5 0 Поврежденность мухой, Поврежденность мухой, балл Выделенные сорта моркови с высоким с высоким моркови сорта Выделенные содержанием сахаров содержанием sugars rust - fly Сумма Сумма сахаров, % From To Carrot cultivars of VIR breeding Princessa, Feya, Delikatessnaya Early maturity (period of vegetation 95-110 days), high yield, with high level of carotene (20-21 mg/100g), for fresh market and storage.
Recommended publications
  • Apiaceae) - Beds, Old Cambs, Hunts, Northants and Peterborough
    CHECKLIST OF UMBELLIFERS (APIACEAE) - BEDS, OLD CAMBS, HUNTS, NORTHANTS AND PETERBOROUGH Scientific name Common Name Beds old Cambs Hunts Northants and P'boro Aegopodium podagraria Ground-elder common common common common Aethusa cynapium Fool's Parsley common common common common Ammi majus Bullwort very rare rare very rare very rare Ammi visnaga Toothpick-plant very rare very rare Anethum graveolens Dill very rare rare very rare Angelica archangelica Garden Angelica very rare very rare Angelica sylvestris Wild Angelica common frequent frequent common Anthriscus caucalis Bur Chervil occasional frequent occasional occasional Anthriscus cerefolium Garden Chervil extinct extinct extinct very rare Anthriscus sylvestris Cow Parsley common common common common Apium graveolens Wild Celery rare occasional very rare native ssp. Apium inundatum Lesser Marshwort very rare or extinct very rare extinct very rare Apium nodiflorum Fool's Water-cress common common common common Astrantia major Astrantia extinct very rare Berula erecta Lesser Water-parsnip occasional frequent occasional occasional x Beruladium procurrens Fool's Water-cress x Lesser very rare Water-parsnip Bunium bulbocastanum Great Pignut occasional very rare Bupleurum rotundifolium Thorow-wax extinct extinct extinct extinct Bupleurum subovatum False Thorow-wax very rare very rare very rare Bupleurum tenuissimum Slender Hare's-ear very rare extinct very rare or extinct Carum carvi Caraway very rare very rare very rare extinct Chaerophyllum temulum Rough Chervil common common common common Cicuta virosa Cowbane extinct extinct Conium maculatum Hemlock common common common common Conopodium majus Pignut frequent occasional occasional frequent Coriandrum sativum Coriander rare occasional very rare very rare Daucus carota Wild Carrot common common common common Eryngium campestre Field Eryngo very rare, prob.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Weeds Photo Identification Guide
    EAT SOMETHING WILD EVERY DAY EATWEEDS PHOTO GUIDE ROBIN HARFORD EATWEEDS.CO.UK Copyright © 2020 by Robin Harford All rights reserved. This publication or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the author. Although every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this document, the publisher and author assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. Neither is any liability assumed for damages resulting from the use of the information contained herein. Eatweeds 47 Old Abbey Court, Salmon Pool Lane Exeter, EX1 2DS, United Kingdom Web: eatweeds.co.uk Instagram: instagram.com/robinjharford 1 Table of Contents Alexanders 4 Black Mustard 7 Bramble 9 Brooklime 11 Burdock 13 Charlock 16 Chickweed 18 Chicory 20 Cleavers 22 Cow Parsley 24 Daisy 26 Dandelion 28 Dock 30 Fat Hen 32 Garlic Mustard 34 Glasswort or Samphire 36 Ground Elder 38 Ground Ivy 40 Himalayan Balsam 42 Hogweed 44 Horseradish 48 Lady's Smock 50 Lesser Celandine 52 Mallow 54 Meadowsweet 56 Mugwort 58 2 Navelwort 60 Oxeye Daisy 62 Plantain, Ribwort 64 Plantain, Greater 66 Primrose 68 Red Clover 70 Rosebay Willowherb 72 Saxifrage 74 Scurvygrass 76 Sea Aster 78 Sea Beet 80 Sea Purslane 82 Selfheal 84 Sorrel 86 Sowthistle 88 Stinging Nettle 90 Three Cornered Leek 92 Violet 94 White Dead Nettle 96 Wild Angelica 98 Wild Garlic 100 Wood Avens 102 Yarrow 104 3 Alexanders Scientific Name Smyrnium olusatrum Family Apiaceae Botanical Description Height: up to 1.5 m. Flowers: greenish-yellow flowers in umbrella-like clusters carry a pungent, myrrh-like scent.
    [Show full text]
  • Seedling Establishment, Bud Movement, and Subterranean Diversity of Geophilous Systems in Apiaceae
    Flora (2002) 197, 385–393 http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/flora Seedling establishment, bud movement, and subterranean diversity of geophilous systems in Apiaceae Norbert Pütz1* & Ina Sukkau2 1 Institute of Nature Conservation and Environmental Education, University of Vechta, Driverstr. 22, D-49377 Vechta, Germany 2 Institute of Botany, RWTH Aachen, Germany * author for correspondence: e-mail: [email protected] Received: Nov 29, 2001 · Accepted: Jun 10, 2002 Summary Geophilous systems of plants are not only regarded as organs of underground storage. Such systems also undergo a large range of modifications in order to fulfill other ‚cryptical‘ functions, e.g. positioning of innovation buds, vegetative cloning, and vege- tative dispersal. Seedlings should always be the point of departure for any investigation into the structure of geophilous systems. This is because in the ability to survive of geophilous plants it is of primary importance that innovation buds can reach a safe position in the soil by the time the first period hostile to vegetation commences. Our analysis of such systems thus focused on examining the development of 34 species of the Apiaceae, beginning with their germination. Independent of life-form and life-span, all species exhibit noticeable terminal bud movement with the aid of contractile organs. Movement was found to be at least 5 mm, reaching a maximum of 45 mm. All species exhibit a noticeable contraction of the primary root. In most cases the contraction phenomenon also occurs in the hypocotyl, and some species show contraction of their lateral and / or adventitious roots. Analysis of movement shows the functional importance of pulling the inno- vation buds down into the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • 422 Part 180—Tolerances and Ex- Emptions for Pesticide
    Pt. 180 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–16 Edition) at any time before the filing of the ini- 180.124 Methyl bromide; tolerances for resi- tial decision. dues. 180.127 Piperonyl butoxide; tolerances for [55 FR 50293, Dec. 5, 1990, as amended at 70 residues. FR 33360, June 8, 2005] 180.128 Pyrethrins; tolerances for residues. 180.129 o-Phenylphenol and its sodium salt; PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EX- tolerances for residues. 180.130 Hydrogen Cyanide; tolerances for EMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEM- residues. ICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 180.132 Thiram; tolerances for residues. 180.142 2,4-D; tolerances for residues. Subpart A—Definitions and Interpretative 180.145 Fluorine compounds; tolerances for Regulations residues. 180.151 Ethylene oxide; tolerances for resi- Sec. dues. 180.1 Definitions and interpretations. 180.153 Diazinon; tolerances for residues. 180.3 Tolerances for related pesticide chemi- 180.154 Azinphos-methyl; tolerances for resi- cals. dues. 180.4 Exceptions. 180.155 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid; tolerances 180.5 Zero tolerances. for residues. 180.6 Pesticide tolerances regarding milk, 180.163 Dicofol; tolerances for residues. eggs, meat, and/or poultry; statement of 180.169 Carbaryl; tolerances for residues. policy. 180.172 Dodine; tolerances for residues. 180.175 Maleic hydrazide; tolerances for resi- Subpart B—Procedural Regulations dues. 180.176 Mancozeb; tolerances for residues. 180.7 Petitions proposing tolerances or ex- 180.178 Ethoxyquin; tolerances for residues. emptions for pesticide residues in or on 180.181 Chlorpropham; tolerances for resi- raw agricultural commodities or proc- dues. essed foods. 180.182 Endosulfan; tolerances for residues. 180.8 Withdrawal of petitions without preju- 180.183 Disulfoton; tolerances for residues.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Lineages Within Apiaceae Subfamily Apioideae: a Comparison of Chloroplast Restriction Site and Dna Sequence Data1
    American Journal of Botany 86(7): 1014±1026. 1999. MAJOR LINEAGES WITHIN APIACEAE SUBFAMILY APIOIDEAE: A COMPARISON OF CHLOROPLAST RESTRICTION SITE AND DNA SEQUENCE DATA1 GREGORY M. PLUNKETT2 AND STEPHEN R. DOWNIE Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 Traditional sources of taxonomic characters in the large and taxonomically complex subfamily Apioideae (Apiaceae) have been confounding and no classi®cation system of the subfamily has been widely accepted. A restriction site analysis of the chloroplast genome from 78 representatives of Apioideae and related groups provided a data matrix of 990 variable characters (750 of which were potentially parsimony-informative). A comparison of these data to that of three recent DNA sequencing studies of Apioideae (based on ITS, rpoCl intron, and matK sequences) shows that the restriction site analysis provides 2.6± 3.6 times more variable characters for a comparable group of taxa. Moreover, levels of divergence appear to be well suited to studies at the subfamilial and tribal levels of Apiaceae. Cladistic and phenetic analyses of the restriction site data yielded trees that are visually congruent to those derived from the other recent molecular studies. On the basis of these comparisons, six lineages and one paraphyletic grade are provisionally recognized as informal groups. These groups can serve as the starting point for future, more intensive studies of the subfamily. Key words: Apiaceae; Apioideae; chloroplast genome; restriction site analysis; Umbelliferae. Apioideae are the largest and best-known subfamily of tem, and biochemical characters exhibit similarly con- Apiaceae (5 Umbelliferae) and include many familiar ed- founding parallelisms (e.g., Bell, 1971; Harborne, 1971; ible plants (e.g., carrot, parsnips, parsley, celery, fennel, Nielsen, 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Index Seminum 2015 List of Seeds for Exchange
    Index Seminum 2015 List of seeds for exchange Glasgow Botanic Gardens 730 Great Western Road Glasgow, G12 OUE Scotland, United Kingdom History of Glasgow Botanic Gardens The Botanic Gardens were founded on an 8-acre site at the West End of Sauchiehall Street at Sandyford in 1817. This was through the initiative of Thomas Hopkirk of Dalbeth who gave his own plant collection to form the nucleus of the new garden. It was run by the Royal Botanical Institution of Glasgow and an agreement was reached with Glasgow University to provide facilities for teaching, including supply of plants for botanical and medical classes. Professor William J. Hooker, Regius Professor of Botany at the University of Glasgow (1820-41), took an active part in the development of the Gardens, which became well known in botanical circles throughout the world. The early success led to expansion and the purchase of the present site, at Kelvinside, in 1842. At the time entry was mainly restricted to members of the Royal Botanical Institution and their friends although later the public were admitted on selected days for the princely sum of one penny. The Kibble Palace which houses the national tree fern collection was originally a private conservatory located at Coulport by Loch Long. It was moved to its present site in 1873 and originally used as a concert venue and meeting place, hosting speakers such as Prime Ministers Disraeli and Gladstone. Increasing financial difficulties led to the Gardens being taken over by the then Glasgow Corporation in 1891 on condition they continued as a Botanic Garden and maintained links with the University.
    [Show full text]
  • GIANT ULLEUNG CELERY Stephen Barstow1, Malvik, March 2020
    GIANT ULLEUNG CELERY 1 Stephen Barstow , Malvik, March 2020 Scientific name: Dystaenia takesimana Carrot family (Apiaceae) English: Seombadi, Sobadi, Dwaejipul, giant Ulleung celery, Korean pig-plant, wild celery, giant Korean celery Korean: 섬바디, 드와지풀 Norwegian: Ulleung kjempeselleri Swedish: Ullungloka, Vulkanloka The genus Dystaenia belongs to the carrot family or umbellifers (Apiaceae) and consists of two perennial species, one is a Japanese endemic (Dystaenia ibukiensis), and the other is endemic to a small island, Ulleung-do in Korea (Dystaenia takesimana). Genetic analysis (Pfosser et al., 2005) suggests that the larger D. takesimana evolved from D. ibukiensis rather than vice versa. The specific epithet takesimana is according to one reference to Takeshima Islet, which is disputed with the Japanese. Campanula takesimana is apparently found there. However, Takeshima island is also an alternative name for Ulleung-do, so this may be a misunderstanding. That Ulleung-do is Takeshima is confirmed on the following web site from the Oki Islands off Japan http://www.oki-geopark.jp/en/flowers-calendar/summer where it is stated that Dystaenia takesimana is also found there and is critically endangered: “This plant was designated as Cultural Property of Ama Town in 2012. It has only been discovered on the two isolated islands of Ama Town of the Oki Islands (Nakanoshima Island) and Ulleung-do Island of South Korea. It can be seen on the Akiya Coast in Nakanoshima Island. It is called Takeshima- shishiudo, as Ulleung-do was referred to as Takeshima” (see the map in Figure 1 for places mentioned here). Ulleung-do is a rocky steep-sided volcanic island some 120 km east of the coast of South Korea, the highest peak reaching 984m.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Garden Plants
    COLONIAL GARD~J~ PLANTS I Flowers Before 1700 The following plants are listed according to the names most commonly used during the colonial period. The botanical name follows for accurate identification. The common name was listed first because many of the people using these lists will have access to or be familiar with that name rather than the botanical name. The botanical names are according to Bailey’s Hortus Second and The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture (3, 4). They are not the botanical names used during the colonial period for many of them have changed drastically. We have been very cautious concerning the interpretation of names to see that accuracy is maintained. By using several references spanning almost two hundred years (1, 3, 32, 35) we were able to interpret accurately the names of certain plants. For example, in the earliest works (32, 35), Lark’s Heel is used for Larkspur, also Delphinium. Then in later works the name Larkspur appears with the former in parenthesis. Similarly, the name "Emanies" appears frequently in the earliest books. Finally, one of them (35) lists the name Anemones as a synonym. Some of the names are amusing: "Issop" for Hyssop, "Pum- pions" for Pumpkins, "Mushmillions" for Muskmellons, "Isquou- terquashes" for Squashes, "Cowslips" for Primroses, "Daffadown dillies" for Daffodils. Other names are confusing. Bachelors Button was the name used for Gomphrena globosa, not for Centaurea cyanis as we use it today. Similarly, in the earliest literature, "Marygold" was used for Calendula. Later we begin to see "Pot Marygold" and "Calen- dula" for Calendula, and "Marygold" is reserved for Marigolds.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX for 2011 HERBALPEDIA Abelmoschus Moschatus—Ambrette Seed Abies Alba—Fir, Silver Abies Balsamea—Fir, Balsam Abies
    INDEX FOR 2011 HERBALPEDIA Acer palmatum—Maple, Japanese Acer pensylvanicum- Moosewood Acer rubrum—Maple, Red Abelmoschus moschatus—Ambrette seed Acer saccharinum—Maple, Silver Abies alba—Fir, Silver Acer spicatum—Maple, Mountain Abies balsamea—Fir, Balsam Acer tataricum—Maple, Tatarian Abies cephalonica—Fir, Greek Achillea ageratum—Yarrow, Sweet Abies fraseri—Fir, Fraser Achillea coarctata—Yarrow, Yellow Abies magnifica—Fir, California Red Achillea millefolium--Yarrow Abies mariana – Spruce, Black Achillea erba-rotta moschata—Yarrow, Musk Abies religiosa—Fir, Sacred Achillea moschata—Yarrow, Musk Abies sachalinensis—Fir, Japanese Achillea ptarmica - Sneezewort Abies spectabilis—Fir, Himalayan Achyranthes aspera—Devil’s Horsewhip Abronia fragrans – Sand Verbena Achyranthes bidentata-- Huai Niu Xi Abronia latifolia –Sand Verbena, Yellow Achyrocline satureoides--Macela Abrus precatorius--Jequirity Acinos alpinus – Calamint, Mountain Abutilon indicum----Mallow, Indian Acinos arvensis – Basil Thyme Abutilon trisulcatum- Mallow, Anglestem Aconitum carmichaeli—Monkshood, Azure Indian Aconitum delphinifolium—Monkshood, Acacia aneura--Mulga Larkspur Leaf Acacia arabica—Acacia Bark Aconitum falconeri—Aconite, Indian Acacia armata –Kangaroo Thorn Aconitum heterophyllum—Indian Atees Acacia catechu—Black Catechu Aconitum napellus—Aconite Acacia caven –Roman Cassie Aconitum uncinatum - Monkshood Acacia cornigera--Cockspur Aconitum vulparia - Wolfsbane Acacia dealbata--Mimosa Acorus americanus--Calamus Acacia decurrens—Acacia Bark Acorus calamus--Calamus
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Food Plant Use in 21St Century Europe: the Disappearance of Old Traditions and the Search for New Cuisines Involving Wild Edibles
    Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae Journal homepage: pbsociety.org.pl/journals/index.php/asbp INVITED REVIEW Received: 2012.07.20 Accepted: 2012.09.12 Published electronically: 2012.11.19 Acta Soc Bot Pol 81(4):359–370 DOI: 10.5586/asbp.2012.031 Wild food plant use in 21st century Europe: the disappearance of old traditions and the search for new cuisines involving wild edibles Łukasz Łuczaj1*, Andrea Pieroni2, Javier Tardío3, Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana4, Renata Sõukand5, Ingvar Svanberg6, Raivo Kalle7 1 Department of Botany and Biotechnology of Economic Plants, University of Rzeszów, Werynia 502, 36-100 Kolbuszowa, Poland 2 University of Gastronomic Sciences, Piazza Vittorio Emanuele 9, 12060 Pollenzo, Cuneo, Italy 3 Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario (IMIDRA), Finca “El Encín”, Apdo. 127, 28800 Alcalá de Henares, Spain 4 Departamento de Biología (Botánica), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Darwin 2, 28049 Madrid, Spain 5 Estonian Literary Museum, Vanemuise 42, 51003 Tartu, Estonia 6 Uppsala Centre for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University, Box 514, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden 7 Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 62, 51014 Tartu, Estonia Abstract The aim of this review is to present an overview of changes in the contemporary use of wild food plants in Europe, mainly using the examples of our home countries: Poland, Italy, Spain, Estonia and Sweden. We set the scene referring to the nutrition of 19th century peasants, involving many famine and emergency foods. Later we discuss such issues as children's wild snacks, the association between the decline of plant knowledge and the disappearance of plant use, the effects of over-exploitation, the decrease of the availability of plants due to ecosystem changes, land access rights for foragers and intoxication dangers.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Wild Food Plants for Human Consumption in Geçitli (Hakkari, Turkey)
    Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge Vol. 14(2), April 2015, pp. 183-190 Survey of wild food plants for human consumption in Geçitli (Hakkari, Turkey) İdris Kaval1, Lütfi Behçet2 & Uğur Çakilcioğlu3* 1Yuzuncu Yıl University, Department of Biology, Van 65000, Turkey; 2Bingöl University, Department of Biology, Bingöl 12000, Turkey; 3Tunceli University, Pertek Sakine Genç Vocational School, Pertek, Tunceli 62500, Turkey E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Received 15 July 2014, revised 22 January 2015 This study aims to record accumulation of knowledge on plants which are used as food by native people of Geçitli (Hakkari, Turkey) that has a rich culture and a very natural environment. In addition, the medical uses of these plants were compiled from the literature. Study area was located on the East of Anatolian diagonal, in the Eastern Anatolia region. Field study was carried out over a period of approximately two years (2008-2010). During this period, 84 vascular plant taxa were collected. The plants were pressed in the field and prepared for identification. A total of 84 food plants belonging to 30 families were identified in the region. In the study being conducted, use of wild plants as food points out interest of people in Geçitli in wild plants. The fact that a large proportion of edible plants are also being used for medicinal purposes indicates that the use of wild plants has a high potential in the region. The present study shows that further ethnobotanical investigations are worthy to be carried out in Turkey, where most of knowledge on popular food plants are still to discover.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Gaps in Traditional Vegetables Native to Europe and Fennoscandia
    agriculture Article Conservation Gaps in Traditional Vegetables Native to Europe and Fennoscandia Kauê de Sousa 1,2 and Svein Øivind Solberg 1,* 1 Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Applied Ecology, Agricultural Sciences and Biotechnology Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, 2318 Hamar, Norway; [email protected] 2 Bioversity International, 00054 Rome, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-7354-01516 Received: 15 July 2020; Accepted: 3 August 2020; Published: 6 August 2020 Abstract: Vegetables are rich in vitamins and other micronutrients and are important crops for healthy diets and diversification of the food system, and many traditional (also termed underutilized or indigenous) species may play a role. The current study analyzed 35 vegetables with a European region of diversity with the effort to map the conservation status in Fennoscandia and beyond. We mapped georeferenced occurrences and current genebank holdings based on global databases and conducted conservation gaps analysis based on representativeness scores in situ and ex situ. Out of the 35 target species, 19 got at a high priority score for further conservation initiatives, while another 14 species got a medium priority score. We identified a pattern where traditional vegetables are poorly represented in genebank holdings. This corresponds well to a lack of attention in the scientific community measured in number of published papers. Considering the grand challenges ahead in terms of climate change, population growth and demand for sustainability, traditional vegetables deserve greater attention. Our contribution is to provide a basis for conservation priorities among the identified vegetables species native to Fennoscandia. Keywords: crop wild relatives; ecosystem services; ensemble models; genetic diversity; plant genetic resources; species distribution models 1.
    [Show full text]