DOCSLIB.ORG

Freight Shipper and Carrier Profile and Commodity Flow Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freight Shipper and Carrier Profile and Commodity Flow Profile Freight Transportation Framework Study A study by the JOINT PLANNING ADVISORY COUNCIL A planning partnership for the Arizona Sun Corridor Technical Memorandum I – Freight Shipper and Carrier Profile and Commodity Flow Profile MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS CENTRAL ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Prepared by: PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF In cooperation with: F. Zuniga, Inc. KDA Creative RCLCo Tompkins Associates Trans-Research International Zachary Maritime Consulting TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Background and Methodology .................................................................................... 7 1.1 Freight Framework Study Background ................................................................ 8 2.0 Shipper Surveys and Interviews .................................................................................. 11 2.1 Shipper Surveys ...................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Survey Respondent Profile ....................................................................... 11 2.1.2 Sun Corridor Shipper Operations............................................................ 13 2.1.3 Imports and Port of Entry ......................................................................... 17 2.1.4 Potential for Future Arizona Operations ................................................ 22 2.2 Shipper Interviews ................................................................................................. 23 2.2.1 Shipper Interviews ..................................................................................... 24 2.2.2 Transportation Service Provider Interviews ........................................... 25 2.2.3 Government and Others ......................................................................... 27 2.3 Consortium Database Best Practices and Benchmarking ............................ 28 2.4 Survey and Interview Findings ............................................................................. 35 2.4.1 Trends in Goods Movement .................................................................... 35 2.4.2 Trends in the Sun Corridor ........................................................................ 36 3.0 Commodity Flow Profile ............................................................................................... 38 3.1 Introduction............................................................................................................ 38 3.1.1 Data Sources Used ................................................................................... 38 3.2 Overview of Sun Corridor Cargo Flows by Direction....................................... 39 3.3 Inbound Cargo ...................................................................................................... 40 3.3.1 Domestic Inbound .................................................................................... 42 3.3.2 International Imports ................................................................................ 47 3.3.3 Cross Border Imports ................................................................................. 50 3.3.4 Denting Southern California’s Dominance in Distribution ................. 51 3.4 Outbound Cargo .................................................................................................. 52 3.4.1 Domestic Outbound ................................................................................ 53 3.4.2 International Exports................................................................................. 56 3.4.3 Cross Border Exports ................................................................................. 58 3.5 Through Cargo ....................................................................................................... 58 3.5.1 Overview and Relevance ....................................................................... 58 3.5.2 East-West Commodity Flows ................................................................... 59 3.5.3 North-South Commodity Flows ............................................................... 68 3.6 Commodity Flow Findings .................................................................................... 72 Freight Transportation Framework Study i Freight Shipper and Carrier Profile Phase I Technical Memorandum 4.0 Ocean and International Cargo ................................................................................. 74 4.1 Current Ocean Cargo Goods Movement Affecting Arizona ....................... 74 4.2 West Coast Port Market ....................................................................................... 75 4.3 Impact of the Panama Canal Expansion ......................................................... 77 4.4 Port of San Diego and the Port of Ensenada ................................................... 79 4.5 US Gulf and Southeastern Ports .......................................................................... 79 4.6 Mexican Ports ......................................................................................................... 80 4.6.1 Port of Punta Colonet .............................................................................. 80 5.0 Rail Cargo ...................................................................................................................... 82 5.1 Railroad Operating Facilities ............................................................................... 82 5.2 Multimodal Customer Facilities ........................................................................... 82 5.2.1 Railroad Intermodal Terminals ................................................................ 82 5.2.2 Transload Terminals ................................................................................... 83 5.2.3 Inland Ports ................................................................................................. 83 5.3 Sun Corridor Rail Network .................................................................................... 83 5.3.1 BNSF............................................................................................................. 86 5.3.2 Union Pacific (UP) ..................................................................................... 87 5.3.3 Short Line Railroads ................................................................................... 88 5.4 Condition and Capacity of the Class I Railroad Network ............................. 89 5.5 Proposed Railroad Improvement Projects ........................................................ 92 5.5.1 BNSF............................................................................................................. 92 5.5.2 UP................................................................................................................. 92 5.6 Railroad Traffic Profile ........................................................................................... 93 5.6.1 Container/Trailer Traffic and Rail Competitiveness ............................ 93 6.0 Trucking and Motor Freight .......................................................................................... 95 6.1 Sun Corridor Highway Network ........................................................................... 95 6.1.1 Highway Inventory .................................................................................... 96 6.1.2 Truck Traffic Volumes and Potential Bottlenecks ................................ 96 6.1.3 Freight Generators ..................................................................................100 6.1.4 Traffic Crash Locations ...........................................................................102 6.1.5 Key Truck Routes and Trade Corridors ................................................102 6.2 Trucking and Motor Freight Profile .................................................................... 103 6.2.1 Driver Availability ....................................................................................104 6.2.2 Limited Capacity ....................................................................................105 6.2.3 Increasing Fuel Costs ..............................................................................106 6.2.4 Regulatory Issues .....................................................................................107 Freight Transportation Framework Study ii Freight Shipper and Carrier Profile Phase I Technical Memorandum 6.3 Truck Load Rates ................................................................................................. 108 6.4 Arizona Ports of Entry .......................................................................................... 110 7.0 Air Cargo .....................................................................................................................112 7.1 Overview of the Air Cargo Industry .................................................................. 112 7.1.1 Types of Air Cargo ..................................................................................112 7.1.2 Types of Carriers ......................................................................................112 7.1.3 Types of Services .....................................................................................113 7.2 Air Cargo Market Trends .................................................................................... 114 7.3 Air Cargo Industry in the Sun Corridor ............................................................. 115 7.3.1 Sun Corridor Air Cargo Assets ...............................................................117
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No. CF No. Adopted Community Plan Area CD Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 08/06/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 3 Woodland Hills - West Hills 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue & 7157 08/06/1962 Sunland - Tujunga - Lake View 7 Valmont Street Terrace - Shadow Hills - East La Tuna Canyon 3 Plaza Church 535 North Main Street and 100-110 08/06/1962 Central City 14 La Iglesia de Nuestra Cesar Chavez Avenue Señora la Reina de Los Angeles (The Church of Our Lady the Queen of Angels) 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill Street 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Dismantled May 1969; Moved to Hill Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, February 1996 5 The Salt Box 339 South Bunker Hill Avenue (Now 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Moved from 339 Hope Street) South Bunker Hill Avenue (now Hope Street) to Heritage Square; destroyed by fire 1969 6 Bradbury Building 300-310 South Broadway and 216- 09/21/1962 Central City 14 224 West 3rd Street 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho 10940 North Sepulveda Boulevard 09/21/1962 Mission Hills - Panorama City - 7 Romulo) North Hills 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 09/21/1962 Silver Lake - Echo Park - 1 Elysian Valley 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/02/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 12 Woodland Hills - West Hills 10 Eagle Rock Eagle Rock View Drive, North 11/16/1962 Northeast Los Angeles 14 Figueroa (Terminus), 72-77 Patrician Way, and 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road 11 The Rochester (West Temple 1012 West Temple Street 01/04/1963 Westlake 1 Demolished February Apartments) 14, 1979 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 01/04/1963 Hollywood 13 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 01/28/1963 West Adams - Baldwin Hills - 10 Leimert City of Los Angeles May 5, 2021 Page 1 of 60 Department of City Planning No.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxnard County Comprehensive Economic
    Oxnard Harbor District Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 2020 Spring 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. BACKGROUND AND EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................................................... 10 2.1.0. DEMOGRAPHIC & SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION ................................................................................................. 12 2.1.2. Population Density ............................................................................................................................................ 13 2.1.3. Households ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 2.1.4. Race and Ethnicity............................................................................................................................................. 13 2.1.5. Age..................................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1.6 Housing .............................................................................................................................................................. 15 2.1.7 Overcrowding ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Port of San Diego
    Port of San Diego The Port of San Diego manages San Diego Bay and its 34 miles of beautiful, natural waterfront for the people of California. The Port was established in 1962 under the Port Act and is charged with implementing the Tidelands Trust Doctrine. For over fifty years, the Port’s five-member cities - Chula Vista, Coronado, Imperial Beach, National City and San Diego - have worked together to develop and promote LEGENDPort of commerce, navigation, recreation and fisheries on and BNSFSan Diego UP/SP Trackage Rights Handling Carrier LEGEND around San Diego Bay. Self-funded, the port contributes Haulage Agreement BNSF billions annually to San Diego’s economy, benefiting the UP/SP Trackage Rights Handling Carrier community, local businesses and employees. The port’s Haulage Agreement cargo maritime business includes two cargo terminals. TERMINAL CAPABILITIES • Harbor: One (San Diego Bay) • Berths: 15 • Cranes: 1 mobile harbor crane • Depth: 30 ft. - 43 ft. • Facilities: Two marine cargo terminals • Rail-Served: On-dock terminal rail • Cargo Handled: Breakbulk Project Cargo Refrigerated Ro-Ro (Roll-on/Roll-off) Alex Williamson Brian Johnston Connie Le Fevre Greg Borossay Sales Manager Sales Manager Sr Trade Representative Maritime Commercial BNSF Railway BNSF Railway Port of San Diego Port of San Diego [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Office: 612-380-8852 Office: 817-304-6425 619-756-1949 619-686-6242 Port of San Diego TERMINAL CAPABILITIES OVERVIEW TENTH AVENUE MARINE TERMINAL • Depth: 30 ft. – 43 ft. • Berth(s): Eight, equaling 4,347 ft. • Cargo Handling Capabilities: • Port owned - 100 Ton Gottwald Crane • Stevedore owned and operated - Reach stackers, rail pusher (leased), utility trucks, fork lifts and heavy lifts • Rail-Served: On-dock rail adjacent to BNSF yard • Main yard: Seven spurs, equaling 9000 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Port Development and Maritime Sector in Mexico
    Opportunities for Port Development and Maritime sector in Mexico Commissioned by the Netherlands Enterprise Agency Report by Marko Teodosijević - Embassy of the Netherlands in Mexico Opportunities for Port Development and Maritime sector in Mexico Investment opportunities in the Port Development Sector Early 2019 Preface In this report current and future business opportunities in the Mexican port development sector are identified. This report is the product of a detailed examination of Mexico’s plans for the development of its ports and maritime sector. The aim of the report is to map business opportunities for Dutch companies that operate in this sector and want to collaborate in Mexico’s sustainable port development programs. It is the objective of the Dutch Embassy to promote a mutually beneficial collaboration between Mexico and The Netherlands in the context of Mexico’s ambitious drive forward in the development of its port and marine sector. Complementary to the available information published by the different governmental institutions, this report includes insights of several stakeholders from the Mexican government and local port authorities. Altogether, the information provided in this report is the product of information gathered from Mexican public institutions combined with information provided by key companies that possess expert knowledge regarding sustainable port development. Firstly, a schematic overview of the institutional port framework will be laid out in order to have a basic understanding of the institutions that have the authority over ports in Mexico and how they are regulated. The agencies in charge of ports will be the primary line of contact for companies who are interested in the development opportunities that will most likely crop up in 2019 and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • March 19, 2012 by SDPTA Chair Jim Unger
    March 19, 2012 By SDPTA C hair Jim Unger Overview– Jim Unger Overview– Jim Unger Port of San Diego Facts: Port includes Five Member Cities: Chula Vista, Coronado, Imperial Beach, National City, San Diego Board of 7 Port Commissioners: Chairman Lou Smith, Coronado Commissioner Vice Chair Ann Moore, Chula Vista Commissioner Secretary Lee Burdick, San Diego Commissioner Commissioner Dan Malcolm, Imperial Beach Commissioner Bob Nelson, San Diego Commissioner Dukie Valderrama, National City Commissioner Scott Peters, San Diego Overview The San Diego Unified Port District a nd Tidelands businesses contributes 30% of Gross Regional Product 77,000 Jobs Partnership with the Port and its tenants Overview The Port is self-sustaining from revenues collected from the Port Tenants with NO TAX DOLLARS FROM CITIZENS Overview Partnership with the Port of San Diego – Participation on the Following Port/Tenant Committees: Maritime, Marketing, Real Estate, Cruise Ship, Public Art, Environmental, Accessibility, Port with no Borders Scholarship & Tidelands Forestry. Downsizing of Port - new President/CEO Wayne Darbeau 13 departments down to 6 & decreased employee headcount by 100 without lay-offs. Background California Statelands Commission Public Trust Policy (2 excerpts below t aken from Public Trust Policy) Lands are owned by t he public and held in trust for the people by t he State of California. Uses of trust lands are generally l imited to those that are water dependent or related, and include commerce, fisheries, and navigation, environmental
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego Unified Port District San Diego, CA 92101
    Page 1 of 215 3165 Pacific Hwy. San Diego Unified Port District San Diego, CA 92101 Special Meeting Minutes Board of Port Commissioners Wednesday,January16,2019 9:30 AM Don L. Nay Port Administration Boardroom Closed Session A. Roll Call. Present: 7 - Commissioner Bonelli, Chairperson Castellanos, Commissioner Malcolm, Commissioner Merrifield, Commissioner Moore, Commissioner Valderrama, and Commissioner Zucchet Excused: 0 Absent: 0 Commissioner Moore was excused until she arrived at 9:36 am. Officers Present: Coniglio, DeAngelis, Monson, Morales, and Russell B. Public Communications. The following member(s) of the public addressed the Board with non agenda-related comments: None CLOSED SESSION Thomas A. Russell, General Counsel, announced the Closed Session items as follows: 1. Closed Session Item No. 1 PERSONNEL EVALUATION: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Government Code Section 54957 No reportable action was taken on this item. San Diego Unified Port District Page 1 Page 2 of 215 Board of Port Commissioners Special Meeting Minutes January 16, 2019 2. 2019-0020 Closed Session Item No. 2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: SDUPD - Chula Vista Bayfront parcel consisting of approximately 74.7 acres of land at H Street and Marina Parkway, Chula Vista Negotiating Parties: RIDA Chula Vista, LLC,- Ira Mitzner and Luke Charlton; City of Chula Vista - Gary Halbert; SDUPD - Shaun Sumner, Tony Gordon, Adam Meyer, Stephanie Shook and Sean Jones. Under Negotiations: Price and Terms
    [Show full text]
  • Port of San Francisco Maritime Cargo and Warehouse Market Analysis
    PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO MARITIME CARGO AND WAREHOUSE MARKET ANALYSIS January 5, 2009 FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Port of San Francisco Prepared by: CBRE Consulting, Inc. Martin Associates EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 3 II. ASSESSEMENT OF EXISTING MARKETS............................................................................ 4 1 HISTORIC MARINE CARGO ACTIVITY AT WEST COAST PORTS............................................ 4 2 ASSESSMENT OF COMPETING BAY AREA PORTS ................................................................... 6 2.1 Port of Redwood City ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Port of Richmond .............................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Port of Stockton ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Port of Sacramento........................................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Port of Benicia................................................................................................................................... 8 3 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
    [Show full text]
  • Container Capacity Expansion Plans at Pacific Coast Ports
    TP 14710E Container Capacity Expansion Plans at Pacific Coast Ports Prepared for: Policy Research Branch Strategic Policy Directorate Policy Group Transport Canada By: Hanam Canada Corporation Victoria, BC January 2007 TP 14710E Container Capacity Expansion Plans at Pacific Coast Ports By: Hanam Canada Corporation 1165 Burdett Avenue Victoria, BC, V8V 3H3 250-381-6768 Web: www.hanamcanada.com Helmut G. Burke, P.Eng., MBA [email protected] January 2007 Container Capacity Expansion Plans at Pacific Coast Ports Hanam Canada Corporation January 2007 The Directory of Pacific Coast Container Ports, Terminals, and Services (TP 14711E) has been published as a companion document to this report. This report reflects the views of Hanam Canada Corporation only and does not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of Transport Canada. Neither Transport Canada, nor its employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this report, or process described herein, and assumes no responsibility for anyone's use of the information. Transport Canada is not responsible for errors or omissions in this report and makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. Transport Canada does not endorse products or companies. Reference in this report to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by Transport Canada and shall not be used for advertising or service endorsement purposes. Trade or company names appear in this report only because they are essential to the objectives of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • On-Call Engineering and Professional Services Contracts M
    Digital Copy • December 20, 2018 • RFP No. 19-016CA ON-CALL ENGINEERING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS M. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT Kleinfelder Construction Services,Inc. 2280 Market Street, Suite 300 Riverside, CA 92501 951-801-3681 951-682-0192 December 20, 2018 City of Corona Administrative Services Department - Purchasing Division Attn: Carol Appelt 400 South Vicentia Ave., Suite 320 Corona, CA 92882 RE: Letter of Transmittal for RFP No. 19-016CA On-call Engineering and Professional Services Contracts M. Construction Management and Support Dear Ms. Appelt: Kleinfelder Construction Services (KCS) appreciates this opportunity to present our qualifications to the City of Corona Department of Water and Power (City) for the Construction Management and Support category (M) of the above-mentioned on- call engineering and professional services contract. We are excited to continue our relationship with the City through this new contract, and offer an exceptionally qualified team with the expertise, experience, and resources required to support the City on any task order assignment. We have carefully reviewed the City’s request for qualifications and are confident that we have a capable and qualified team to meet your needs for this contract and to ensure your Capital Improvement Program goals are achieved. The KCS team offers the following differentiators: ✓ Extensive and relevant experience on projects similar to ✓ A deep bench of qualified staff members to support those anticipated by City any task ✓ Experts at managing and staffing on-call contracts with ✓ Ability to provide full-scope construction management multiple task orders and various project needs from pre-construction to close-out ✓ Expert Project Manager, Construction Managers, ✓ In-depth knowledge of the City’s procedures, Scheduling, and Administrative Staff expectations, and goals ABOUT KCS: KCS is a leader in managing and staffing on-call construction management contracts as a prime consultant.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Health Community Development and Human
    Baja California's Community Based Needs EDUCATION HEALTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HUMAN SERVICES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT CULTURE AND THE ARTS 2003 la Frontera Norte; Elisa Sabatini, Executive Director, Los Acknowledgements Niños; Kenn Morris, Director Cross Border Business Associates and Celina Borbón García, Vinculación Social, he International Community Foundation (ICF) and the state government of Baja California. Tthe Fundación Internacional de la Comunidad (FIC) wish to extend our appreciation to the many people and We also wish to acknowledge the on-going support of organizations that gave of their time, expertise and Jean Kluver and the Honorable Lucy Killea, Former financial support to make this needs assessment possible. California State Senator and Former ICF President & In particular, we would like to extend our thanks to CEO, who both gave of their time and advice in reviewing Chuck Nathanson, Executive Director of the San Diego various draft versions of this publication. We also want to Dialogue who inspired us to undertake this needs thank FIC Board Member, Yolanda S. Walther Meade, assessment as a way to promote greater civic engagement for her work in the translation of this document into in the San Diego/Baja California region through Spanish and Monserrat Huizar of MonseDesign for her philanthropy. tireless efforts in providing graphical design support throughout this project. We are particularly appreciative of the institutional support received from Tijuana Trabaja, the Consejo de We are also most indebted
    [Show full text]
  • Borderless Innovation, Co-Authored by Kenn Morris, MBA; Nathan Owens, MA; and Mary L
    DEVELOPED IN COLLABORATION WITH A REPORT BY WITH THE GENEROUS SUPPORT OF DECEMBER 2005 GOBIERNO DEL ESTADO DE BAJA CALIFORNIA Acknowledgements This report on Borderless Innovation, co-authored by Kenn Morris, MBA; Nathan Owens, MA; and Mary L. Walshok, Ph.D., is part of a much larger effort, the Crossborder Innovation and Competitiveness Initiative, which is the current focus of the San Diego Dialogue, a program of UCSD Extension. The research underlying this report and the publication of the final document – in both English and Spanish – has been made possible by the generous support of very good friends and colleagues in Baja California, including: the State of Baja California; CENTRIS, an economic development collaborative in Tijuana; and CICESE, a federally funded science and technology research center in Ensenada. Equally generous was the support from Wells Fargo Bank, the City of Chula Vista and UCSD Extension’s program development funds. Our funders provided more than financing. CENTRIS, in particular, was the key partner in the execution of this report and we owe a special debt of gratitude to Rodrigo Gutiérrez Sández and Ulises Elías. Individuals from CICESE who were especially helpful include: Carlos Duarte Muñoz, Laura Robles, Dr. Arturo Serrano Santoyo and María Mendoza Díaz. The impetus for our overall effort comes largely from Baja California Gov. Eugenio Elorduy Walther, a long time supporter of the San Diego Dialogue. His enthusiasm for building a clearer understanding of the dynamics of the crossborder region as a first step to launching an aggressive “call to action” which would accelerate economic development on both sides of the border, has been an inspiration to us all.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 San Diego
    BINATIONAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF TIJUANA, BAJA CALIFORNIA January 14, 2013 Binational Hazardous Materials Prevention and Emergency Response Plan Among the County Of San Diego, the City of San Diego, California, and the City of Tijuana, Baja California January 14, 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2005-Present ...................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2003 .................................................................................................... 6 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................... 10 PARTICIPATING AGENCIES................................................................................................... 17 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 1.0 TIJUANA/SAN DIEGO BORDER REGION ................................................................. 25 1.1 General Aspects of the Region ........................................................................................ 25 1.1.1 Historical and Cultural Background ................................................................ 25 1.1.2 Geographic Location
    [Show full text]