PORT of OAKLAND President ALAN S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Port of San Diego
Port of San Diego The Port of San Diego manages San Diego Bay and its 34 miles of beautiful, natural waterfront for the people of California. The Port was established in 1962 under the Port Act and is charged with implementing the Tidelands Trust Doctrine. For over fifty years, the Port’s five-member cities - Chula Vista, Coronado, Imperial Beach, National City and San Diego - have worked together to develop and promote LEGENDPort of commerce, navigation, recreation and fisheries on and BNSFSan Diego UP/SP Trackage Rights Handling Carrier LEGEND around San Diego Bay. Self-funded, the port contributes Haulage Agreement BNSF billions annually to San Diego’s economy, benefiting the UP/SP Trackage Rights Handling Carrier community, local businesses and employees. The port’s Haulage Agreement cargo maritime business includes two cargo terminals. TERMINAL CAPABILITIES • Harbor: One (San Diego Bay) • Berths: 15 • Cranes: 1 mobile harbor crane • Depth: 30 ft. - 43 ft. • Facilities: Two marine cargo terminals • Rail-Served: On-dock terminal rail • Cargo Handled: Breakbulk Project Cargo Refrigerated Ro-Ro (Roll-on/Roll-off) Alex Williamson Brian Johnston Connie Le Fevre Greg Borossay Sales Manager Sales Manager Sr Trade Representative Maritime Commercial BNSF Railway BNSF Railway Port of San Diego Port of San Diego [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Office: 612-380-8852 Office: 817-304-6425 619-756-1949 619-686-6242 Port of San Diego TERMINAL CAPABILITIES OVERVIEW TENTH AVENUE MARINE TERMINAL • Depth: 30 ft. – 43 ft. • Berth(s): Eight, equaling 4,347 ft. • Cargo Handling Capabilities: • Port owned - 100 Ton Gottwald Crane • Stevedore owned and operated - Reach stackers, rail pusher (leased), utility trucks, fork lifts and heavy lifts • Rail-Served: On-dock rail adjacent to BNSF yard • Main yard: Seven spurs, equaling 9000 ft. -
Filing Port Code Filing Port Name Manifest Number Filing Date Next
Filing Port Call Sign Next Foreign Trade Official Vessel Type Total Dock Code Filing Port Name Manifest Number Filing Date Next Domestic Port Vessel Name Next Foreign Port Name Number IMO Number Country Code Number Agent Name Vessel Flag Code Operator Name Crew Owner Name Draft Tonnage Dock Name InTrans 5204 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 5204-2021-00375 1/14/2021 - TROPIC MIST FREEPORT, GRAND BAHAMA I J8NZ 8204183 BS 3 400204 TROPICAL SHIPPING CO. VC 333 TROPICAL SHIPPING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD. 14 TROPICAL SHIPPING AND CONSTRUCTION 15'0" 548 PORT OF PALM BEACH BERTHS NOS. 8 & 9 (2012) DLX 1803 JACKSONVILLE, FL 1803-2021-00350 1/14/2021 - SLNC MAGOTHY (EX. NORFLOK) GUANTANAMO BAY WDI3067 9418975 CU 3 1262669 CB AGENCIES US 310 ARGENT MARINE OPERATIONS, INC. 17 HS MAGOTHY LLC 27'0" 6089 BLOUNT ISLAND - BERTHS 4 - 6 LY 4601 NEW YORK/NEWARK AREA 4601-2021-01122 1/14/2021 BALTIMORE, MD MAERSK VILNIUS - 9V8503 9408956 - 6 395877 NORTON LILLY INTERNATIONAL SG 310 A.P. MOLLER MAERSK A/S 22 A.P. MOLLER SINGAPORE PTE, LTD 28'3" 8602 PORT NEWARK CONTAINER TERM (PNCT) BERTHS 53, 55, 57, 59 DFL 5301 HOUSTON, TX 5301-2021-01995 1/14/2021 - CHEMSTAR TIERRA ARATU 3EXM9 9827451 BR 2 49547-18 GENERAL STEAMSHIP INC. PA 112 IINO MARINE SERVICE CO., LTD. 24 SIETEMAR, S.A. 34'0" 6474 KINDER MORGAN GALENA PARK L 4601 NEW YORK/NEWARK AREA 4601-2021-01121 1/14/2021 NORFOLK, VA MELCHIOR SCHULTE - 9V3053 9676723 - 6 399740 Turkon America SG 310 BEACH ROAD PARK SHIPPING CO. -
March 19, 2012 by SDPTA Chair Jim Unger
March 19, 2012 By SDPTA C hair Jim Unger Overview– Jim Unger Overview– Jim Unger Port of San Diego Facts: Port includes Five Member Cities: Chula Vista, Coronado, Imperial Beach, National City, San Diego Board of 7 Port Commissioners: Chairman Lou Smith, Coronado Commissioner Vice Chair Ann Moore, Chula Vista Commissioner Secretary Lee Burdick, San Diego Commissioner Commissioner Dan Malcolm, Imperial Beach Commissioner Bob Nelson, San Diego Commissioner Dukie Valderrama, National City Commissioner Scott Peters, San Diego Overview The San Diego Unified Port District a nd Tidelands businesses contributes 30% of Gross Regional Product 77,000 Jobs Partnership with the Port and its tenants Overview The Port is self-sustaining from revenues collected from the Port Tenants with NO TAX DOLLARS FROM CITIZENS Overview Partnership with the Port of San Diego – Participation on the Following Port/Tenant Committees: Maritime, Marketing, Real Estate, Cruise Ship, Public Art, Environmental, Accessibility, Port with no Borders Scholarship & Tidelands Forestry. Downsizing of Port - new President/CEO Wayne Darbeau 13 departments down to 6 & decreased employee headcount by 100 without lay-offs. Background California Statelands Commission Public Trust Policy (2 excerpts below t aken from Public Trust Policy) Lands are owned by t he public and held in trust for the people by t he State of California. Uses of trust lands are generally l imited to those that are water dependent or related, and include commerce, fisheries, and navigation, environmental -
NPDES WW Power Plant and Industrial with and Without Stormwater
COLOR KEY: Industry not covered by 40 CFR?? Does not appear to be but Double- Look Into. These may not be covered by 40 CFR. Check to be sure. Not appear to be Not sure. Not familiar enough with industry to Steam Electric Turbine. know if they have a Steam Electric Turbine. 40 CFR covers:(vii) Steam electric power generating facilities, including coal handling sites; Needs SW Permit? Is a Power plant, does not have a SW permit but DOES Needs SW Permit? Check to see if there are SW Not a Power Plant - have SW language in it. We need to outfalls. May need SW Permit. Ask the Region if Needs NPDES SW evaluate these. Ask the Region. they have been there… Permit? Look into. Has SW permit but may have coal pile on site - not covered in SW General Permit? Look at site and permit. Contact Region Has SW General or Individual Permit. No Action SW permit expired Has Ken Power plant? Permit Owner Facility County Region Class Expires SW permit SW text? Comments / Action Power Plant? Reviewed? SW language in permit NC0000396 NC0000396 Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. Asheville Steam Electric Power Plant Buncombe Asheville Major 12/31/2010 none YES Power Plant - Needs NPDES SW Permit? Power plant yes Visual*, 2/yrVisual, 2/yr NC0003433 NC0003433 Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. Cape Fear Steam Electric Power Plant Chatham Raleigh Major 7/31/2011 none YES Power Plant - Needs NPDES SW Permit? Power plant yes none NC0005363 NC0005363 Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. Weatherspoon Steam Electric Plant Robeson Fayetteville Minor 7/31/2009 none YES Power Plant - Needs NPDES SW Permit? Power plant yes Visual, TSS, O&G, As, Cu, Fe, Hg, Se, pH: all 2/yrVisual, 2/yr NC0038377 NC0038377 Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. -
San Diego Unified Port District San Diego, CA 92101
Page 1 of 215 3165 Pacific Hwy. San Diego Unified Port District San Diego, CA 92101 Special Meeting Minutes Board of Port Commissioners Wednesday,January16,2019 9:30 AM Don L. Nay Port Administration Boardroom Closed Session A. Roll Call. Present: 7 - Commissioner Bonelli, Chairperson Castellanos, Commissioner Malcolm, Commissioner Merrifield, Commissioner Moore, Commissioner Valderrama, and Commissioner Zucchet Excused: 0 Absent: 0 Commissioner Moore was excused until she arrived at 9:36 am. Officers Present: Coniglio, DeAngelis, Monson, Morales, and Russell B. Public Communications. The following member(s) of the public addressed the Board with non agenda-related comments: None CLOSED SESSION Thomas A. Russell, General Counsel, announced the Closed Session items as follows: 1. Closed Session Item No. 1 PERSONNEL EVALUATION: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Government Code Section 54957 No reportable action was taken on this item. San Diego Unified Port District Page 1 Page 2 of 215 Board of Port Commissioners Special Meeting Minutes January 16, 2019 2. 2019-0020 Closed Session Item No. 2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: SDUPD - Chula Vista Bayfront parcel consisting of approximately 74.7 acres of land at H Street and Marina Parkway, Chula Vista Negotiating Parties: RIDA Chula Vista, LLC,- Ira Mitzner and Luke Charlton; City of Chula Vista - Gary Halbert; SDUPD - Shaun Sumner, Tony Gordon, Adam Meyer, Stephanie Shook and Sean Jones. Under Negotiations: Price and Terms -
Port of San Francisco Maritime Cargo and Warehouse Market Analysis
PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO MARITIME CARGO AND WAREHOUSE MARKET ANALYSIS January 5, 2009 FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Port of San Francisco Prepared by: CBRE Consulting, Inc. Martin Associates EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 3 II. ASSESSEMENT OF EXISTING MARKETS............................................................................ 4 1 HISTORIC MARINE CARGO ACTIVITY AT WEST COAST PORTS............................................ 4 2 ASSESSMENT OF COMPETING BAY AREA PORTS ................................................................... 6 2.1 Port of Redwood City ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Port of Richmond .............................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Port of Stockton ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Port of Sacramento........................................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Port of Benicia................................................................................................................................... 8 3 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA -
On-Call Engineering and Professional Services Contracts M
Digital Copy • December 20, 2018 • RFP No. 19-016CA ON-CALL ENGINEERING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS M. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT Kleinfelder Construction Services,Inc. 2280 Market Street, Suite 300 Riverside, CA 92501 951-801-3681 951-682-0192 December 20, 2018 City of Corona Administrative Services Department - Purchasing Division Attn: Carol Appelt 400 South Vicentia Ave., Suite 320 Corona, CA 92882 RE: Letter of Transmittal for RFP No. 19-016CA On-call Engineering and Professional Services Contracts M. Construction Management and Support Dear Ms. Appelt: Kleinfelder Construction Services (KCS) appreciates this opportunity to present our qualifications to the City of Corona Department of Water and Power (City) for the Construction Management and Support category (M) of the above-mentioned on- call engineering and professional services contract. We are excited to continue our relationship with the City through this new contract, and offer an exceptionally qualified team with the expertise, experience, and resources required to support the City on any task order assignment. We have carefully reviewed the City’s request for qualifications and are confident that we have a capable and qualified team to meet your needs for this contract and to ensure your Capital Improvement Program goals are achieved. The KCS team offers the following differentiators: ✓ Extensive and relevant experience on projects similar to ✓ A deep bench of qualified staff members to support those anticipated by City any task ✓ Experts at managing and staffing on-call contracts with ✓ Ability to provide full-scope construction management multiple task orders and various project needs from pre-construction to close-out ✓ Expert Project Manager, Construction Managers, ✓ In-depth knowledge of the City’s procedures, Scheduling, and Administrative Staff expectations, and goals ABOUT KCS: KCS is a leader in managing and staffing on-call construction management contracts as a prime consultant. -
Investment Performance Review for Period Ending March 31, 2018
PERIOD ENDING: MARCH 31, 2018 Investment Performance Review for Alameda County Employees’ Retirement Association 1st quarter summary THE ECONOMIC CLIMATE THE INVESTMENT CLIMATE Changing — The U.S. economy is expected to grow at around 2.2% in — Excitement and optimism over tax cuts helped lead market Q1. Economists expect a slightly quicker rate of growth equities higher to begin the year. However, markets dynamics throughout the year. We believe that this middle-of-the- stumbled in February – falling roughly 10%. Equities road expansion – characterized as not too fast and not too recovered much of the losses throughout the quarter, suggest a slow – may allow the U.S. economy to continue but then fell back to their lows at the end of March. neutral or mild expanding for longer than expected. risk overweight — 2018 is expected to be a banner year for U.S. corporate — The U.S. has enacted a 25% tariff on steel and a 10% tariff profits. Earnings for the calendar year are forecast to grow may be on aluminum, which went into effect on March 23rd. The 17.3%, with 7.3% revenue growth. These 2018 warranted U.S. also engaged with China over allegations of expectations may already be priced in. asymmetrical trade policies and intellectual property theft. — February’s market correction appeared isolated to the equity markets. “Risk-off” selling that often accompanies market drawdowns was not apparent – credit spreads, PORTFOLIO IMPACTS U.S. Treasuries, and gold, reacted minimally. — Global economic growth has improved – low inflation, strong employment, and accommodative foreign central ASSET ALLOCATION ISSUES bank policies have been supportive of equity prices. -
2013 San Diego
BINATIONAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF TIJUANA, BAJA CALIFORNIA January 14, 2013 Binational Hazardous Materials Prevention and Emergency Response Plan Among the County Of San Diego, the City of San Diego, California, and the City of Tijuana, Baja California January 14, 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2005-Present ...................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2003 .................................................................................................... 6 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................... 10 PARTICIPATING AGENCIES................................................................................................... 17 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 1.0 TIJUANA/SAN DIEGO BORDER REGION ................................................................. 25 1.1 General Aspects of the Region ........................................................................................ 25 1.1.1 Historical and Cultural Background ................................................................ 25 1.1.2 Geographic Location -
San Diego's PEV Roadmap: Planning for Plug-In Electric Vehicles
San Diego Regional PEV Planning through The EV Project REVI Meeting Agenda Item 7A SDG&E Energy Innovation Center March 21, 2013 Overview • EV Project regional planning components • San Diego’s regional approach o What made an “optimal” charging site? o GIS modeling and mapping • Long-term goals and near-term needs • From planning to implementation PEV Infrastructure Planning • Near-Term Needs o Identify method to best site PEV chargers o Use visual tools through GIS mapping o Plan for 1,500 publicly accessible chargers • Long-Term Goals o Select [public] sites where it makes sense for the region o Reduce driver “range anxiety” o Develop interregional network o Enhance future siting capabilities The EV Project Project and advisory meetings led by Ecotality Stakeholder Advisory Committee • SANDAG • SDG&E • County of San Diego • Nissan • City of San Diego • Qualcomm • Santee • UCSD • SDSU • Chula Vista • California Center for • Escondido Sustainable Energy • Oceanside • San Diego Regional • Port of San Diego Clean Cities Coalition What Makes an Optimal Site for Level 2 PEV chargers? What Makes an Optimal Fast Charge Site? Site characteristics 5 minute to half hour stay Part of daily routine Regular turnover in vehicles Available to many different users Convenient Not necessarily a destination stop 1,500 PEV chargers Target dark and light GREEN areas Mission Valley, San Diego High Above Average land use categories Availability throughout year Daily hours of availability Qualcomm Available to many users Stadium Trip attractors and employment -
The Rise of Latham & Watkins
The M&A journal - Volume 7, Number 5 The Rise of Latham & Watkins In 2006, Latham & Watkins came in fifth in terms of deal value.” the U.S. for deal value in Thompson Financial’s Mr. Nathan sees the U.S. market as crucial. league tables and took second place for the num- “This is a big part of our global position,” he says, ber of deals. “Seven years before that,” says the and it is the Achilles’ heel of some of the firm’s firm’s Charles Nathan, global co-chair of the main competitors. “The magic circle—as they firm’s Mergers and Acquisitions Group, “we dub themselves—Allen & Overy, Freshfields, weren’t even in the top twenty.” Latham also Linklaters, Clifford Chance and Slaughters— came in fourth place for worldwide announced have very high European M&A rankings and deals with $470.103 million worth of transactions, global rankings, but none has a meaningful M&A and sixth place for worldwide completed deals presence in the U.S.,” Mr. Nathan says. Slaughter Charles Nathan worth $364.051 million. & May, he notes, has no offices abroad. What is behind the rise of Latham & Watkins Similarly, in the U.S., Mr. Nathan says that his in the world of M&A? firm has a much larger footprint than its domestic “If you look back to the late nineties,” Mr. rivals. “Unlike all the other major M&A firms,” Nathan says, “Latham was not well-recognized he says, “we have true national representation. as an M&A firm. We had no persona in M&A. -
General* DC Private Equity Deals
WASHINGTON D.C. M&A ACTIVITY SNAPSHOTS 2002-2006 US M&A Global M&A Year Deal Count Volume (Millions) Year Deal Count Volume (Millions) 2006 11296 $ 1,776,292.75 2006 27912 $ 3,679,516.00 2005 10348 $ 1,297,140.12 2005 24526 $ 2,627,013.25 2004 9716 $ 971,593.81 2004 22102 $ 1,914,663.25 2003 8109 $ 627,724.56 2003 19353 $ 1,221,885.25 2002 7316 $ 528,825.06 2002 18557 $ 1,130,339.12 D.C. M&A - General* D.C. Private Equity Deals* Year Deal Count Volume (Millions) Year Deal Count Volume (Millions) 2006 174 $ 83,927.33 2006 74 $ 75,883.12 2005 184 $ 23,639.45 2005 32 $ 14,385.54 2004 121 $ 7,729.28 2004 16 $ 3,430.96 2003 85 $ 5,378.20 2003 8 $ 372.30 2002 59 $ 2,996.22 2002 2 $ 326.83 * Any involvement: includes deals with either target, acquirer * Any involvement: includes deals with either target, acquirer or or seller headquartered in the state. seller headquartered in the state. 2006 Active Industries - D.C. Industry Deal Count Volume (mil) Financial 11 $ 5,671.12 Consumer, Cyclica 10 $ 573.40 Consumer, Non-cy 10 $ 138.00 Industrial 2 $ 110.00 Communications 7 $ 8.00 * Target Only: Includes deals in which target is headquartered in the state Top 5 Deals 2006 - US * Any Involvement Announced Total Value Rank Date (mil.) Target Name Acquirer Name 1 3/ 5/06 $ 83,105.46 BELLSOUTH CORP AT&T INC 2 11/20/2006 $ 32,500.31 EQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUST BLACKSTONE GROUP 3 7/24/06 $ 32,193.46 HCA INC CONSORTIUM* 4 5/29/06 $ 27,449.73 KINDER MORGAN INC Knight Holdco LLC** 5 10/2/2006 $ 27,159.94 HARRAH'S ENTERTAINMENT INC CONSORTIUM*** * Bain Capital LLC, Kohlberg Kravis Robert, Merrill Lynch & Co Inc ** Goldman Sachs Group Inc, American International Group Inc, The Caryle Group, Riverstone Holdings LLC, Management Group *** Apollo Management LP, Texas Pacific Group 2006 TOP 5 DEALS - WASHINGTON D.C.