DOCSLIB.ORG

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 Oxnard Harbor District Port Hueneme, California 1 The Port of Hueneme (Port) is the only deep-water harbor between Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay and is a US Port of Entry. The Port plays a vital role in the intermodal logistics supply chain and is critical to the economic vitality of Ventura County and Southern California. The Port facilitates the transport of over $9.5 billion in cargo, generates a $1.7 billion economic impact, and provides more than 15,834 direct, indirect, induced and influenced jobs regionally. The niche markets that the Port serves include the import and export of automobiles, non- automotive roll-on roll-off cargo, project cargo, fresh produce and liquid bulk. Its unique positioning near the Santa Barbara Channel and fertile fishing grounds has also made the Port the primary support facility for the offshore oil industry along California’s Central Coast region and an active squid offloading hub. In fiscal year 2019, the Port handled over 1.65 million metric tons of cargo transported on calls from over 350 deep draft ocean-going vessels. This strong performance generated the Port’s highest revenue year in its 82 year history. Port of Hueneme – Oxnard Harbor District Board of Harbor Commissioners as of June 30, 2019 Name Title Elected/Appointed Current Term Jess Herrera President Elected 1/19 – 1/23 Jess Ramirez Vice President Elected 1/17 – 1/21 Jason T. Hodge Secretary Elected 1/19 – 1/23 Dr. Manuel M. Lopez Commissioner Elected 1/17 – 1/21 Mary Anne Rooney Commissioner Elected 1/19 – 1/23 Prepared by: Kristin Decas – CEO & Port Director Andrew Palomares – Deputy Executive Director, CFO/CAO Austin Yang – Director of Finance Oxnard Harbor District 333 Ponoma Street • Port Hueneme, California 93041 (805) 488-3677 • www.portofH.org 2 Commissioners as of June 30, 2019 Jess Herrera Jess Ramirez Jason Hodge Dr. Manuel Lopez Mary Anne Rooney PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT SECRETARY COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER Senior Staff Kristin Decas Andrew Palomares CEO & PORT DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DIRECTOR, CFO/CAO DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Austin Yang CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER Christina Birdsey CHIEF COMMERCIAL & PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICER Dona Toteva Lacayo Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2019 3 Table of Contents The Port of Hueneme 2 Commissioners and Senior Staff 3 Introductory Section Letter of Transmittal 7 Profile 8 Niche as a Southern California Port - The California Ports 9 FY 2019 Cargo Performance and Cargo Trends 10-11 Autos Import/Export Trade 12-13 Agriculture Sector Import/Export Trade 14 Fertilizer Import Trade - Real Estate Investments 15 Domestic Trade 16 Strategic Planning 17 Jobs/Economic Impact 18 Marketing - Environment 19 Strategic Partnerships - Community Outreach - Capital Planning 21-22 Organizational Chart 26 Awards and Acknowledgments 27-30 2019 Information 31-34 Financial Section Independent Auditor’s Report 36-38 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) 40-44 Basic Financial Statements: Balance Sheet 45 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 46 Statements of Cash Flows 47-48 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements 49-80 Required Supplementary Information Schedule of the District’s Proportionate Share of the Plan’s (PERF C) Net Pension Liability 82 Schedule of Contribution – Pension Plan 83 Schedule of Changes in the District’s Net OPEB Liability and Related Ratio 84 Supplemental Information Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 86 Schedule of Operating Expenses 87-88 Schedule of Non-Operating Revenues and Expenses 89 Schedule of Debt Service Net Revenues Coverage Ratio 89 Statistical Information Net Position by Component – Last Ten Fiscal Years 91 Summary of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position – Last Ten Fiscal Years 92-93 Revenue Bond Coverage – Last Ten Fiscal Years 94-95 Largest Revenue Customers – Last Ten Fiscal Years 96-97 Ten Year Trend – Cargo Revenue Tons – Last Ten Fiscal Years 98-99 Ten Year Trend in Tonnages for California Ports – Last Ten Fiscal Years 100-101 Employees Statistics – Last Ten Fiscal Years 102 Demographic and Economic Statistics – Last Ten Fiscal Years 103 Other Independent Auditor’s Reports Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control and Compliance - Single Audit Report 104-106 4 Introductory Section Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2019 5 5 Introductory Section Issued November 30, 2019 FY 2019 Port Performance Analysis The following report provides a comprehensive review of the Port’s performance for Fiscal Year 2019. The information provided supports the conclusions outlined in the Fiscal Year 2019 Audit. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2019 6 Jess Herrera President Jess Ramirez Vice President Jason T. Hodge Secretary Dr. Manuel M. Lopez Commissioner Mary Anne Rooney Commissioner November 30, 2019 To the Board of Harbor Commissioners of the Oxnard Harbor District Port Hueneme, California Dear: Commissioner, Jess Herrera, President Commissioner, Jess Ramirez, Vice President Commissioner, Jason T. Hodge, Secretary Commissioner Dr. Manuel M. Lopez Commissioner Mary Anne Rooney State law requires that every general-purpose government publish within six months of the close of each fiscal year a complete set of audited financial statements. This report is published to fulfill that requirement for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. The Chief Executive Officer and Port Director, and the Deputy Executive Director and CFO/CAO, along with the rest of the man- agement team assume full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of the information contained in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and Financial Statements, based upon a comprehensive framework of internal control that it has established for this purpose. Because the cost of internal control should not exceed anticipated benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of any material misstatements. Nigro & Nigro, PC, has issued an unmodified (“clean”) opinion on the Port’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. The independent auditor’s report is located at the front of the financial section of this report. A comprehensive FY 2019 Port Performance Analysis immediately follows this letter and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. The MD&A complements this letter of transmittal and should be read in conjunction with it. Sincerely, 7 Introductory Section Port of Hueneme Profile The Port of Hueneme, an official US Port of Entry located within Ventura County, is one of the eleven California deep water seaports vital to the statewide economy. The Port of Hueneme was initially built to serve the agricultural sector in the County. Today the Port serves as the strategic auto and reefer hub on the US West Coast, situated within sixty miles of the largest populated area on the West Coast-Los Angeles, with over 4 million people. Serving as the Ventura County region’s engine for the economy and one of the state’s strategic intermodal transportation Ports, the Port of Hueneme provides the County with competitive advantages to attract private investment while creating family sustaining jobs in California. Over $9.5 billion in cargo value moves through the Port on annual basis generating a $1.7 billion economic impact and impacting over 15,834 trade related direct, induced, indirect, and influenced jobs. Trade activity resulting from the Port generates $119 million in state, county and local tax revenues to support vital community services. The Oxnard Harbor District (District) is a political subdivision of the State of California and operates as an independent special district. The District owns and manages the commercial Port of Hueneme. The District was created in 1937 pursuant to authority of the State of California Harbors and Navigation Code, the state legislation that provides for the formation and governance of Harbor Districts (Section § 6000 et. al). A five-member Board of Harbor Commissioners, elected at large from the District, sets the policies for the Port of Hueneme. The District’s current political boundaries are comprised of the City of Oxnard (population 215,265), the City of Port Hueneme (population 22,173) and a few unincorporated beach communities within Ventura County. Each Harbor Commissioner is popularly elected for a four-year term by the voters of the Oxnard Harbor District as defined by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo). Their terms are staggered to maintain a level continuity in Board leadership across elections. The day-to-day business operations of the District [Herein called the Port] are administered by the CEO and professional staff. The Port is empowered to acquire, construct, own, operate, control and develop any and all harbor works or facilities necessary to the efficient undertaking of its mission. The Port prepares and controls its own budget, administers and controls its fiscal activities, and is responsible for all Port construction and operations. The Port does not assess taxes. Port operating expenses are funded by the revenues generated through tariff charges, leases and other contract revenues assessed upon Port users. Port Terminal Schedule No. 8, as amended from time to time, sets forth the rules, regulations and fees applicable to the use of Port facilities. The Port has long-term contracts with customers that provide for minimum guarantees and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No. CF No. Adopted Community Plan Area CD Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 08/06/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 3 Woodland Hills - West Hills 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue & 7157 08/06/1962 Sunland - Tujunga - Lake View 7 Valmont Street Terrace - Shadow Hills - East La Tuna Canyon 3 Plaza Church 535 North Main Street and 100-110 08/06/1962 Central City 14 La Iglesia de Nuestra Cesar Chavez Avenue Señora la Reina de Los Angeles (The Church of Our Lady the Queen of Angels) 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill Street 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Dismantled May 1969; Moved to Hill Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, February 1996 5 The Salt Box 339 South Bunker Hill Avenue (Now 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Moved from 339 Hope Street) South Bunker Hill Avenue (now Hope Street) to Heritage Square; destroyed by fire 1969 6 Bradbury Building 300-310 South Broadway and 216- 09/21/1962 Central City 14 224 West 3rd Street 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho 10940 North Sepulveda Boulevard 09/21/1962 Mission Hills - Panorama City - 7 Romulo) North Hills 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 09/21/1962 Silver Lake - Echo Park - 1 Elysian Valley 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/02/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 12 Woodland Hills - West Hills 10 Eagle Rock Eagle Rock View Drive, North 11/16/1962 Northeast Los Angeles 14 Figueroa (Terminus), 72-77 Patrician Way, and 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road 11 The Rochester (West Temple 1012 West Temple Street 01/04/1963 Westlake 1 Demolished February Apartments) 14, 1979 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 01/04/1963 Hollywood 13 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 01/28/1963 West Adams - Baldwin Hills - 10 Leimert City of Los Angeles May 5, 2021 Page 1 of 60 Department of City Planning No.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxnard County Comprehensive Economic
    Oxnard Harbor District Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 2020 Spring 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. BACKGROUND AND EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................................................... 10 2.1.0. DEMOGRAPHIC & SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION ................................................................................................. 12 2.1.2. Population Density ............................................................................................................................................ 13 2.1.3. Households ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 2.1.4. Race and Ethnicity............................................................................................................................................. 13 2.1.5. Age..................................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1.6 Housing .............................................................................................................................................................. 15 2.1.7 Overcrowding ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Port Development and Maritime Sector in Mexico
    Opportunities for Port Development and Maritime sector in Mexico Commissioned by the Netherlands Enterprise Agency Report by Marko Teodosijević - Embassy of the Netherlands in Mexico Opportunities for Port Development and Maritime sector in Mexico Investment opportunities in the Port Development Sector Early 2019 Preface In this report current and future business opportunities in the Mexican port development sector are identified. This report is the product of a detailed examination of Mexico’s plans for the development of its ports and maritime sector. The aim of the report is to map business opportunities for Dutch companies that operate in this sector and want to collaborate in Mexico’s sustainable port development programs. It is the objective of the Dutch Embassy to promote a mutually beneficial collaboration between Mexico and The Netherlands in the context of Mexico’s ambitious drive forward in the development of its port and marine sector. Complementary to the available information published by the different governmental institutions, this report includes insights of several stakeholders from the Mexican government and local port authorities. Altogether, the information provided in this report is the product of information gathered from Mexican public institutions combined with information provided by key companies that possess expert knowledge regarding sustainable port development. Firstly, a schematic overview of the institutional port framework will be laid out in order to have a basic understanding of the institutions that have the authority over ports in Mexico and how they are regulated. The agencies in charge of ports will be the primary line of contact for companies who are interested in the development opportunities that will most likely crop up in 2019 and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop & Livestock Report 2013
    VENTURA COUNTY’S Crop & Livestock Report 2013 Local and World Marketplace OFFICE OF THE Contents AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER 1 Agricultural Commissioner’s Letter AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER Henry S. Gonzales 2 Recapitulation & Index 3 Five Year Comparison CHIEF DEPUTY AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER Rudy Martel 4 Ten Leading Crops for 2013 4 Other Million Dollar Crops DEPUTY AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONERS Korinne Bell, Ryan Casey, 5 Fruit and Nut Crops Ellen Kragh 6 Vegetable Crops ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT 8 Ventura County Local and Rita Aguilera, Maribel Lemus, Bernice World Marketplace Muñoz, Sara Venegas, Luz Villavicencio 10 Nursery Stock SUPERVISING AGRICULTURAL 11 Cut Flowers INSPECTOR/BIOLOGISTS Blanca Enriquez-Pratt, Jamie Mastright, 12 Field Crops George Mendoza, Michael Otani 12 Livestock and Poultry AGRICULTURAL INSPECTOR/BIOLOGISTS 13 Apiary Production Lauren Balthazor, Justin Bertoline, Vanessa Cruz, Tim Fritch, Brady 13 Timber Gergovich, Freddi Herrmann, Jennifer 14 Sustainable Agriculture Le, Bridget Lux, Nanette Quayson, Christy Robinett, Jose Ruiz, Loveleen 15 Certified Farmers’ Markets Sandhu, Zamara Thibodeaux, Greta Varien, Carl Waite, Scott Wilson, 16 Story of the Avocado: Ventura David Wirta, Darrin Yant, Cristina County Born, Raised and Consumed Zamora, Erika Zapien INSECT DETECTION SPECIALISTS Sincerest thanks to staff members, both present and past, who contributed to this report. Special recognition goes to Brittnee Clifford Ball, Linda Bellamy, Carter for assisting in data collection and to Linda Bellamy and Andrew DuBridge,
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Local Coastal Program
    Port Hueneme General Plan Background Report Local Coastal Program 13 Local Coastal Program 13.1 Purpose The Local Coastal Program (LCP) is a planning document that includes land use plans, a zoning ordinance, zoning district maps, and other implementing actions in the coastal zone that meet the requirements of and implement the California Coastal Act (Public Resources Code Section 30108.6). The Coastal Act applies to the coastal zone, a strip along the California coast generally “extending seaward to the state’s outer limit of jurisdiction, including all offshore islands, and extending inland generally 1,000 yards from the mean high tide line of the sea” (Public Resources Code Section 30103). Development in the coastal zone requires a Coastal Development Permit (CDP). Once a city has an LCP certified by the Coastal Commission, the ability to grant CDPs is transferred from the Coastal Commission to the City. For an LCP to be certified by the Coastal Commission, it must include a Land Use Plan (LUP), policies, and an Implementation Plan (IP) that ensures the goals of the Coastal Act are being met. Because much of Port Hueneme is within the coastal zone, an LCP is required for the City to have the ability to issue CDPs within the City’s boundaries. See Figure 13.1 for the City’s Coastal Zone boundary. The existing LCP, adopted in 2006, prescribes the policies and procedures governing the use and development of land within the Coastal Zone. General Plan Background Report 1 Figure 13.1 Port Hueneme Coastal Zone Boundary and Land Uses 2 Port Hueneme General Plan Background Report Local Coastal Program 13.2 Relationship to Other Plans and Programs The Port Hueneme LCP connects to and overlaps with several other plans, ordinances, and programs adopted and implemented by the City.
    [Show full text]
  • Container Capacity Expansion Plans at Pacific Coast Ports
    TP 14710E Container Capacity Expansion Plans at Pacific Coast Ports Prepared for: Policy Research Branch Strategic Policy Directorate Policy Group Transport Canada By: Hanam Canada Corporation Victoria, BC January 2007 TP 14710E Container Capacity Expansion Plans at Pacific Coast Ports By: Hanam Canada Corporation 1165 Burdett Avenue Victoria, BC, V8V 3H3 250-381-6768 Web: www.hanamcanada.com Helmut G. Burke, P.Eng., MBA [email protected] January 2007 Container Capacity Expansion Plans at Pacific Coast Ports Hanam Canada Corporation January 2007 The Directory of Pacific Coast Container Ports, Terminals, and Services (TP 14711E) has been published as a companion document to this report. This report reflects the views of Hanam Canada Corporation only and does not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of Transport Canada. Neither Transport Canada, nor its employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this report, or process described herein, and assumes no responsibility for anyone's use of the information. Transport Canada is not responsible for errors or omissions in this report and makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. Transport Canada does not endorse products or companies. Reference in this report to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by Transport Canada and shall not be used for advertising or service endorsement purposes. Trade or company names appear in this report only because they are essential to the objectives of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • I-15 Corridor System Master Plan Update 2017
    CALIFORNIA NEVADA ARIZONA UTAH I-15 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2017 MARCH 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan (Master Plan) is a commerce, port authorities, departments of aviation, freight product of the hard work and commitment of each of the and passenger rail authorities, freight transportation services, I-15 Mobility Alliance (Alliance) partner organizations and providers of public transportation services, environmental their dedicated staff. and natural resource agencies, and others. Individuals within the four states and beyond are investing Their efforts are a testament of outstanding partnership and their time and resources to keep this economic artery a true spirit of collaboration, without which this Master Plan of the West flowing. The Alliance partners come from could not have succeeded. state and local transportation agencies, local and interstate I-15 MOBILITY ALLIANCE PARTNERS American Magline Group City of Orem Authority Amtrak City of Provo Millard County Arizona Commerce Authority City of Rancho Cucamonga Mohave County Arizona Department of Transportation City of South Salt Lake Mountainland Association of Arizona Game and Fish Department City of St. George Governments Bear River Association of Governments Clark County Department of Aviation National Park Service - Lake Mead National Recreation Area BNSF Railway Clark County Public Works Nellis Air Force Base Box Elder County Community Planners Advisory Nevada Army National Guard Brookings Mountain West Committee on Transportation County
    [Show full text]
  • Education Health Community Development and Human
    Baja California's Community Based Needs EDUCATION HEALTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HUMAN SERVICES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT CULTURE AND THE ARTS 2003 la Frontera Norte; Elisa Sabatini, Executive Director, Los Acknowledgements Niños; Kenn Morris, Director Cross Border Business Associates and Celina Borbón García, Vinculación Social, he International Community Foundation (ICF) and the state government of Baja California. Tthe Fundación Internacional de la Comunidad (FIC) wish to extend our appreciation to the many people and We also wish to acknowledge the on-going support of organizations that gave of their time, expertise and Jean Kluver and the Honorable Lucy Killea, Former financial support to make this needs assessment possible. California State Senator and Former ICF President & In particular, we would like to extend our thanks to CEO, who both gave of their time and advice in reviewing Chuck Nathanson, Executive Director of the San Diego various draft versions of this publication. We also want to Dialogue who inspired us to undertake this needs thank FIC Board Member, Yolanda S. Walther Meade, assessment as a way to promote greater civic engagement for her work in the translation of this document into in the San Diego/Baja California region through Spanish and Monserrat Huizar of MonseDesign for her philanthropy. tireless efforts in providing graphical design support throughout this project. We are particularly appreciative of the institutional support received from Tijuana Trabaja, the Consejo de We are also most indebted
    [Show full text]
  • Borderless Innovation, Co-Authored by Kenn Morris, MBA; Nathan Owens, MA; and Mary L
    DEVELOPED IN COLLABORATION WITH A REPORT BY WITH THE GENEROUS SUPPORT OF DECEMBER 2005 GOBIERNO DEL ESTADO DE BAJA CALIFORNIA Acknowledgements This report on Borderless Innovation, co-authored by Kenn Morris, MBA; Nathan Owens, MA; and Mary L. Walshok, Ph.D., is part of a much larger effort, the Crossborder Innovation and Competitiveness Initiative, which is the current focus of the San Diego Dialogue, a program of UCSD Extension. The research underlying this report and the publication of the final document – in both English and Spanish – has been made possible by the generous support of very good friends and colleagues in Baja California, including: the State of Baja California; CENTRIS, an economic development collaborative in Tijuana; and CICESE, a federally funded science and technology research center in Ensenada. Equally generous was the support from Wells Fargo Bank, the City of Chula Vista and UCSD Extension’s program development funds. Our funders provided more than financing. CENTRIS, in particular, was the key partner in the execution of this report and we owe a special debt of gratitude to Rodrigo Gutiérrez Sández and Ulises Elías. Individuals from CICESE who were especially helpful include: Carlos Duarte Muñoz, Laura Robles, Dr. Arturo Serrano Santoyo and María Mendoza Díaz. The impetus for our overall effort comes largely from Baja California Gov. Eugenio Elorduy Walther, a long time supporter of the San Diego Dialogue. His enthusiasm for building a clearer understanding of the dynamics of the crossborder region as a first step to launching an aggressive “call to action” which would accelerate economic development on both sides of the border, has been an inspiration to us all.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 San Diego
    BINATIONAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF TIJUANA, BAJA CALIFORNIA January 14, 2013 Binational Hazardous Materials Prevention and Emergency Response Plan Among the County Of San Diego, the City of San Diego, California, and the City of Tijuana, Baja California January 14, 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2005-Present ...................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2003 .................................................................................................... 6 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................... 10 PARTICIPATING AGENCIES................................................................................................... 17 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 1.0 TIJUANA/SAN DIEGO BORDER REGION ................................................................. 25 1.1 General Aspects of the Region ........................................................................................ 25 1.1.1 Historical and Cultural Background ................................................................ 25 1.1.2 Geographic Location
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Corridor System Master Plan
    MARCH 2012 CALIFORNIANEVADAARIZONAUTAH I-15 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN MOVINGPEOPLE MOVINGGOODS Acknowledgements The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan (Master Plan) and the • City of Orem associated technical studies are products of the hard work and • City of Rancho Cucamonga commitment of each of the I-15 Mobility Alliance (Alliance) partner organizations and their dedicated staff. Their efforts are a • City of South Salt Lake testament of outstanding partnership and a true spirit of collabo- • City of St. George ration, without which this Master Plan could not have succeeded. • Clark County Department of Aviation Susan Martinovich, Director of the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) and 2011 American Association of State • Clark County Public Works Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) President, served • County of San Bernardino as the Chair of the Alliance’s Executive Board and, through her agency, provided the initial funding for this effort. Without this • DesertXpress support, the creation of the Master Plan and Alliance would not • Economic Development Corporation of Utah have been possible. Her leadership and vision were an inspiration to all those participating in the Alliance. • El Dorado Holdings • Envision Utah I-15 Mobility Alliance Partners • Federal Highway Administration The I-15 Mobility Alliance partners that have participated in this • Federal Railroad Administration effort are listed below in alphabetical order. • Five County Association of Governments • American Magline Group • Freeway and Arterial System
    [Show full text]
  • Special Anniversary Issue Moran’S Mexican Debut Is up and Running Milestones
    The Magazine of Volume 63 Moran Towing Corporation November 2010 Special Anniversary Issue Moran’s Mexican Debut Is Up and Running Milestones 34 miles north of Ensenada, tug’s motion, thereby preventing snap-loads and Mexico, in Pacific waters breakage. This enables the tug to perform opti- just off the Mexican Baja, mally, at safe working loads for the hawser, under Moran’s SMBC joint ven- a very wide range of sea state and weather condi- ture (the initials stand for tions. The function is facilitated by sensors that Servicios Maritimos de Baja continuously detect excess slack or tension on the California) has been writ- line, and automatically compensate by triggering 15ing a new chapter in the company’s history. either spooling or feeding out of line in precise- SMBC, a joint venture with Grupo Boluda ly the amounts necessary to maintain a pre-set Maritime Corporation of Spain, has been operat- standard of tension. ing at this location since 2008. It provides ship To a hawser-connected tug and tanker snaking assist, line handling and pilot boat services to over the crests of nine-foot swells, this equipment LNG carriers calling at Sempra LNG’s Energia is as indispensable as a gyroscope is to a rocket; its Costa Azul LNG terminal. stabilizing effect on the motion of the lines and SMBC represents a new maritime presence in vessels gives the mariners complete control. North American Pacific coastal waters. Each of its As part of this capability, upper and lower load tugs bears dual insignias on its stacks: the Moran ranges can be digitally selected and monitored “M” and Boluda’s “B”.
    [Show full text]