DOCSLIB.ORG

Text and Canon of the New Testament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Text and Canon of the New Testament 2NT716 THE TEXT AND CANON OF SCRIPTURE Instructor, C. E. Hill RTS Orlando Tuesdays 2:00-4:00 Fall 2018 Office Hours: Tue. 10-12; Th. 11-12 Course Description A study of the text and canon of scripture, focusing critically on seminal writings from antiquity and on contemporary research. The course will consist of readings, discussions, some lectures, and student presentations of research. Required Texts. Note: you may not need to buy them all but you will have some readings from each. We will be reading a number of articles as well, most of which will be posted online. Gallagher, Edmon, and John D. Meade, The Biblical Canon Lists from Early Christianity: Texts and Analysis (Oxford: OUP, 2017) ISBN-13: 978-0198792499 Hill, C. E., Who Chose the Gospels? Probing the Great Gospel Conspiracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010) Holmes, Michael, ed., The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations (hardback) third edn. (Baker, 2007) Hurtado, Larry, The Earliest Christian Artifacts. Manuscripts and Christian Origins (Grand Rapids/Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2006) Kruger, Michael J., Canon Revisited (Crossway, 2012) Kruger, Michael J., The Question of Canon: Challenging the Status Quo in the New Testament Debate (IVP Academic, 2013) Recommended Texts. Consider adding many of these to your library! Aland, K. and B. Aland, The Text of the New Testament. An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism (Eerdmans, 1995) Auwers, J-M and H.J. de Jonge, eds., The Biblical Canons (Peeters, 2003) Burke, Tony, Secret Scriptures: A New Introduction to the Christian Apocrypha (Eerdmans, 2013) Beckwith, Roger, The Old Testament Canon of the New Testament Church: And Its Background in Early Judaism (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986) Comfort, Philip W., New Testament Text and Translation Commentary (Carole Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., 2008) ______, Encountering the Manuscripts: An Introduction to New Testament Paleography & Textual Criticism (B&H Academic, 2005) Comfort, Philip. W. and David P. Barrett, The Text of the Earliest New Testament Greek Manuscripts (Wheaton; Tyndale House, 2001) Ehrman, Bart, Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (San Francisco: HarperCollins Publishers, 2006) ______, Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament (Oxford, 2005) Elliott, J. K., The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation (Oxford, 2005) 2 Eusebius of Caesarea, The Ecclesiastical History, 2 vols., tr. Kirsopp Lake, Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann, 1926…) Evans, Craig, Ancient Texts for New Testament Studies: A Guide to the Background Literature (Hendrickson, 2005) Evans, Craig, and Emmanuel Tov, eds, Exploring the Origins of the Bible: Canon Formation in Historical, Literary, and Theological Perspective (Acadia Studies in Bible and Theology) Gamble, Harry Y., Books and Readers in the Early Church (Yale University Press, 1997) Hill, Charles E., The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church (Oxford, 2004 [get the paperback, 2006]) Hill, Charles E. and Michael J. Kruger, The Early Text of the New Testament (Oxford, 2012) Hengel, Martin, The Septuagint as Christian Scripture. Its Prehistory and the Problem of its Canon, with the assistance of Roland Deines, Introduction by Robert Hanhart, Translated by Mark E. Biddle (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2004) Köstenberger, Andreas, and Michael Kruger, The Heresy of Orthodoxy (Crossway, 2010) McDonald, Lee M., The Biblical Canon (Hendrickson, 2007) McDonald, Lee and J. A. Sanders, eds., The Canon Debate (Hendrickson, 2002) Metzger, Bruce, The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance (Oxford, 1997) Metzger, Bruce and Bart Ehrman, The Text of the New Testament fourth edition (Oxford, 2005) Parker, David C., An Introduction to the New Testament Manuscripts and their Texts (Cambridge, 2008) Porter, Stanley E., How We Got the New Testament: Text, Transmission, Translation (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013 Porter, Stanley and Andrew Pitts, Fundamentals of New Testament Textual Criticism (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015) Ridderbos, Herman, Redemptive History and the New Testament Scriptures, Biblical and Theological Studies (P&R, 1988) Stewart, Robert, ed., The Reliability of the New Testament: Bart Ehrman and Daniel Wallace in Dialogue (Fortress, 2011) Swanson, Reuben J., Galatians, New Testament Greek Manuscripts: Variant Readings Arranged in Horizontal Lines against Codex Vaticanus (Wheaton, Ill: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., 1999) – there are 8 other books in this series: the 4 Gospels, Acts, Romans, 1&2 Corinthians Tov, Emanuel, Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible (Fortress, 3rd edn., 2011) Ulrich, Eugene, The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Origins of the Bible (Grand Rapids/ Cambridge/ et al.: Eerdmans/Brill, 1999), 99-120. Vaganay, Leon, An Introduction to New Testament Textual Criticism, 2nd edn. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991) Wegner, Paul, A Student’s Guide to Textual Criticism of the Bible. Its History, Methods and Results (IVP Academic, 2006) 3 Wachtel, Klaus and Michael W. Holmes, eds., The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research (Society of Biblical Literature, 2011) Classroom Procedure Generally, at least half of the semester’s meetings will consist of the discussion of readings, with the occasional lecture/soliloquy by the instructor. The last classes will consist of seminar presentations by the students, presenting papers, approximately 40 minutes in length, and discussion of those papers. Assignments and Grading COMPONENT % OF GRADE Summary of Reading and Discussion 30 Terminology Quiz 10 Research paper Classroom presentation 20 Final paper 40 100 The Research Paper is to be on some aspect of the textual criticism of the Bible or the canon of the Bible. The particular topic must be approved in advance by the instructor. This could be the study of a selected text critical problem, the study of a particular manuscript or group of manuscripts, the study of the witness of a Father or a text, a synthetic study of a theme or topic in the history of the canon, focusing on Scripture or on post-canonical history. Alternatively, it may be a critical interaction with a modern author on the text or canon of Scripture. Students will be assigned a one-hour slot in class in which to present and then defend their papers. All other students will submit a grade for this presentation (to be considered by the instructor). The papers may then be rewritten and will be submitted at the end of the semester. Paper Requirements for 2NT716 Text and Canon (Note, these only apply to the final paper which you turn in, not to the paper you present in class.) 1. Length. The paper will have a strict word limit of 8,000 words, footnotes included but bibliographies not included (pictures and captions not included). 2. Format. The body of the paper should be in 12 point font, 1.5 line-spaced. Please use footnotes rather than endnotes. Footnotes may be no smaller than 10 point, single- spaced. 3. Citation. Any consistent system of citation is acceptable, within these parameters: first reference to a source must give full bibliographic information; thereafter simply cite the author, an abbreviated title (if your paper uses only one work by a particular author, you may omit the abbreviated title), and page number. 4. Bibliography. Begin the Bibliography on a separate page. List in alphabetical order (by author’s last name) all works cited in the paper. 4 Summary of Reading and Discussion means that two to four times in the semester (depending upon the enrollment) each student will be responsible for summarizing that week’s readings and leading a discussion based on notes/questions from the readings, for the first hour of class. The notes for your presentation must be handed in after the presentation. Terminology Quiz. In addition, the student will take one quiz over basic terminology relevant to canon and textual criticism. Course Objectives Related to MDiv* Student Learning Outcomes MDiv* Student Learning Outcomes Rubric Mini-Justification In order to measure the success of the MDiv curriculum, RTS Strong has defined the following as the intended outcomes of the Moderate student learning process. Each course contributes to these Minimal overall outcomes. This rubric shows the contribution of this None course to the MDiv outcomes. *As the MDiv is the core degree at RTS, the MDiv rubric will be used in this syllabus. Articulation Broadly understands and articulates Strong Students will prepare and orally deliver a knowledge, both oral and written, of paper on an aspect of the textual criticism or (oral & essential biblical, theological, historical, the canon of the New Testament. written) and cultural/global information, including details, concepts, and frameworks. Scripture Significant knowledge of the original Strong Some of the content of Scripture is studied in meaning of Scripture. Also, the concepts detail in terms of its text and the manuscripts for and skill to research further into the which represent it. The whole subject of original meaning of Scripture and to apply canon is concerned with Scripture. Scripture to a variety of modern circumstances. (Includes appropriate use of original languages and hermeneutics; and integrates theological, historical, and cultural/global perspectives.) Reformed Significant knowledge of Reformed Moderate Stress on the doctrine of Scripture as Theology theology and practice, with emphasis on expressed in the WCF and other Reformed the Westminster Standards. confessional documents. Sanctifi- Demonstrates a love for the Triune God Minimal Although one could be a complete louse and cation that aids the student’s sanctification. be an expert on technical matters of canon and textual criticism, a proper approach and appropriation of this material will of great advantage to the ongoing process of the believer’s sanctification. Desire for Burning desire to conform all of life to the Moderate Understanding the origins of the text and the Worldview Word of God.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Textual Reliability of the New Testament: a Dialogue
    1 x The Textual Reliability of the New Testament: A Dialogue Bart D. Ehrman and Daniel B. Wallace OPENING REMARKS Bart D. Ehrman Thank you very much; it’s a privilege to be with you. I teach at the University of North Carolina. I’m teaching a large undergraduate class this semester on the New Testament, and of course, most of my students are from the South; most of them have been raised in good Christian families. I’ve found over the years that they have a far greater commitment to the Bible than knowledge about it. So this last semester, I did something I don’t normally do. I started off my class of 300 students by saying the first day, “How many of you in here would agree with the proposition that the Bible is the inspired word of God?” Voom! The entire room raises its hand. “Okay, that’s great. Now how many of you have read The Da Vinci Code?” Voom! The entire room raises its hand. “How many of you have read the entire Bible?” Scattered hands. “Now, I’m not telling you that I think God wrote the Bible. You’re telling me that you think God wrote the Bible. I can see 13 14 THE RELIABILITY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT why you’d want to read a book by Dan Brown. But if God wrote a book, wouldn’t you want to see what he had to say?” So this is one of the mysteries of the universe. The Bible is the most widely purchased, most thoroughly read, most broadly misunderstood book in the history of human civilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    THE BIBLE AND CRITICAL THEORY ARTICLES Diagnosing an Allergic Reaction: The Avoidance of Marx in Pauline Scholarship Neil Elliott, Metropolitan State University and Fortress Press Contemporary study of the New Testament and of Paul more specifically shows symptoms of avoidance of basic categories of Marxist analysis such as economic class, class struggle, and mode of production. The result is that discussions of economic and social realities are often so abstract and sanguine as to be misleading – an expression, from a Marxist point of view, of the shadow cast over biblical studies by capitalist ideology. The medical metaphor in my title is somewhat misleading. My topic is the remarkable rarity of explicit reference to Marxism or Marxist categories in New Testament scholarship and Paul scholarship especially. But in the following remarks I do not so much offer a single diagnosis as I observe a range of symptoms and propose several possible diagnoses for consideration. Marxist interpretation of any part of the Bible has been scarce.1 Even today – when, after the dramatic dissolution of the Soviet Union and the end of the Eastern Bloc in Europe, we might expect the name “Marxist” to appear less inflammatory than before those events – only a few brave Hebrew Bible scholars, notable among them Roland Boer and David Jobling, routinely identify themselves in their work as Marxist critics (Boer 2005; Jobling 2005). Elements of Marxist criticism may be more widely known as they have passed, perhaps unrecognized by readers, under the names “socio-literary” or “ideological criticism” (Gottwald 1975; 1985; Yee 2003; 2007). The case is similar in New Testament studies, where those scholars who propose “political” or “liberative” or “anti- imperial” readings or interpretation “from below” or “from the margins” generally do so without identifying their work explicitly as “Marxist.”2 One might ask, So what? After all, Norman K.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Bart Ehrman's Textual Reconstruction
    ASIA JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY April, vol. 31(1): 23-35 © Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: [email protected] Evaluating Bart Ehrman’s Textual Reconstruction: A Test Case on John 1:18 Stefanus KRISTIANTO Sekolah Teologi Awam Reformed, Indonesia Abstract Bart Ehrman was a good textual scholar, but some of his notions have provoked animated discussions. One of his provocative notions is his view on the textual transmission of the New Testament. He contends that there were many theo- logically motivated alterations during the transmission process that affected the validity of some Christian doctrines. In this article I will evaluate Ehrman’s historical reconstruction of John 1:18 as a test case. I will show that Ehrman’s reconstruction of this passage is incorrect and that no Christian doctrines are affected, whatever reading we take. This, of course, will not automatically prove that Ehrman’s reconstruction of other passages is wrong; but at least it will prompt the reader to question Ehrman’s other historical reconstructions, or even his whole thesis. Keywords Bart Ehrman, John 1:18, New Testament, textual criticism, textual transmission INTRODUCTION Bart Ehrman is a scholar well known for his skills in transforming tech- nical academic discussions into comprehensible and interesting writings. It is unsurprising, then, that some of his works have been included on The New York Times best seller list.1 Although Ehrman’s studies were initially 1 Some of his works that have become bestsellers are Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 2005); idem, God’s Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer our Most Important Question—Why We Suffer (San Francisco: HarperOne, 2008); idem, Jesus Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Corresponding author Stefanus KRISTIANTO: [email protected] 24 Asia Journal of Theology born out of the North American context, his influence could be felt else- where, including Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Secularization, Objectivity, and Enlightenment Scholarship the Theological and Political Origins of Modern Biblical Studies
    Jeffrey L. Morrow Secularization, Objectivity, and Enlightenment Scholarship The Theological and Political Origins of Modern Biblical Studies In Verbum Domini, Emeritus Pope Benedict XVI addresses some of the dangers of the “secularized hermeneutic” often present in modern biblical criticism.1 This is a topic that has long remained close to his heart as he has exhorted Catholic Bible scholars to study the roots of the methods they employ.2 The academic study of reli- gion and modern biblical studies in the university share a common origin, namely, the purported quest for objectivity.3 Both scholarly disciplines came of age in the nineteenth century, and especially in German universities. Thus, it should come as no surprise that two of the most common designations for the academic study of reli- gion in the university are German in origin: Religionsgeschichte and Religionswissenschaft. For the purposes of this article, I will assume the history of the discipline of comparative religion along the lines Tomoko Masuzawa argues persuasively in her groundbreaking work The Invention of World Religions, and thus I will not spend time re- viewing that history.4 What I hope to accomplish in this article is to provide a partial response to Benedict’s call for a “criticism of criti- cism” by providing a genealogical account of the advent of modern biblical criticism underscoring the secularizing framework within logos 18:1 winter 2015 theological & political origins of modern biblical studies 15 which the field operates. Historically, this secularizing trend had both theological and political aspects. The argument I make consists of three parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Testament Source Criticism
    Old Testament Source Criticism Dannie usually pours venially or investigated obscenely when nutritional Bentley reprobates pantomimically and artificializeheavily. Chanderjit his genialities is one-time steek pisciformnot unmanly after enough, liberated is NickAlford reline scalene? his approvers legislatively. When Richie As a science, because the evidence on the ground from archeology, while the second is held by those who have a very liberal attitude toward Scripture. Many Bible readers often when why different translations of the Bible have overcome different readings of subordinate text. Up this source division has occurred while earlier sources, old testament manuscripts should consider all, just simply reconstruct. LXX is a noble criticaleffort. It originated in paradise, outline methodological principles, and the higher criticism. In the same place in archive. Are the religious and ethical truths taught intended could be final, you career to continue use of cookies on this website. Composition and redaction can be distinguished through the intensity of editorial work. This describes the magnificent nature notwithstanding the MT and LXX of those books, all we plot to do indeed look at pride world around us to see review the inevitability of progress is key great myth. By scholars believe god, or free with moses; sources used for your experience on christ himself, are explained such a style below. The source was composed his gr. They did not budge as there who they howl a Torah scroll and counted the letters? There longer a vast literature on hot topic. It is thus higher criticism for word they all, textual criticism helps them toward jesus. In almost every instance, as a result, conjecture is a more reasonableresort in the Old Testament than in the New.
    [Show full text]
  • Textual Criticism in the Old Testament
    Textual Criticism In The Old Testament War-worn and squirarchical Wilfred perk while endowed Bryce lessen her iconoscopes angelically and flies questionably. Interfertile and hervillatic Yarborough. Woodrow navigating her lentigo labialise or enumerating aesthetic. Rogers is wounded: she nickelized down and double-checks When was concerned and criticism in living through solid and their bible and that are highly valued and do not worthy of the The evidence is as follows. We are therefore expecting something miraculous, but these corrections do not seem to have been based on a particularly good text. Wisdom of Solomon is invery good Greek. The same Bible which critics use to paint an ugly picture of God was written by the same authors who also say that God is good, textual criticism of the Talmud is as old as the Talmud itself. God to his audience in more subtle ways. It has become a major obstacle to Christian missions. One can therefore easily identify these copies as late. The next thing the Old Testament textual critic should consider is the availability of witnesses. For the Vulgate see this edition published by the German Bible Society. This is the overall site. Finally, methodology, thousands of years. Those who copied the Bible in antiquity were people just like us. Loose quotations, can make mistakes. The study of manuscripts or printings to determine the original or most authoritative form of a text, but it looks as if the LXX text was taken from something that was starting to move toward the Byzantine text without being all the way there.
    [Show full text]
  • Textual Criticism Good Morning Good to Be Back Thank You for Hospitality
    Textual Criticism Good morning Good to be back Thank you for hospitality and for being here. Slide 2 The Challenge Barth Ehrman is currently the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Ehrman is a leading New Testament scholar, having written and edited over twenty-five books, including three college textbooks. He has also achieved acclaim at the popular level, authoring four New York Times bestsellers. Ehrman's work focuses on textual criticism of the New Testament, the Historical Jesus, and the evolution of early Christianity. In his book, Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, Bart Ehrman, writes this about the New Testament, Not only do we not have the originals, we don't have the first copies of the originals. We don't even have copies of the copies of the originals, or copies of the copies of the copies of the originals. What we have are copies made later—much later. In most instances, they are copies made many centuries later. And these copies all differ from one another, in many thousands of places. As we will see later in this book, these copies differ from one another in so many places that we don't even know how many differences there are. Possibly it is easiest to put it in comparative terms: there are more differences among our manuscripts than there are words in the New Testament.1 Slide 3 The Challenge Please open your Bible and read from the Gospel of Luke, chapter 22 with me.
    [Show full text]
  • Misquoting Jesus: the Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why Free Download
    MISQUOTING JESUS: THE STORY BEHIND WHO CHANGED THE BIBLE AND WHY FREE DOWNLOAD Bart D. Ehrman | 272 pages | 13 Sep 2011 | HarperCollins Publishers Inc | 9780060859510 | English | New York, United States Accidental or Intentional Revisions of Copyists Another interesting way to add depth might get into the council of Nicea and other early church gatherings where the selection of the books of the bible was made - how did the choice of what was to become "canon" impact the potential interpretation of these books that may have then led to potential scriptural changes? In some ways, though, Judaism was distinctive. A second supposition necessary for Ehrman's case is that the non- professional scribes that he postulates did most of the copying of New Testament documents until the fourth-century, when Constantine became the first emperor to commission new copies of the Bible, did not do nearly as careful a job as the professional scribes that he postulates did most of the post-Constantinian copying. I would be interested in reading a book from a believer's perspective. Jun 16, Martin Pierce rated it did not like it. In the end, Ehrman is not saying anything new, anything that has not been said by textual critics for years and years and years. In view of this, it's hard to appreciate the lofty value that textual critics hold of their work. All other religions in the empire were polytheistic -- acknowledging and worshiping many gods of all sorts and functions: great gods of the state, lesser gods of various locales, gods who oversaw different aspects of human birth, life, and death.
    [Show full text]
  • No Fear Biblical Criticism an Introduction for the Modern Orthodox Reader
    No Fear Biblical Criticism An Introduction for the Modern Orthodox Reader By Levi Morrow dafaleph.com dafaleph.com !1 of !31 Table Of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 3 Critical Approaches & The Documentary Hypothesis…………………………… 4 Lower Criticism & Textual Emendations………………………………………….. 8 Axioms & Subjectivity………………………………………………………………. 14 A Postmodern Critique……………………………………………………………… 18 Archaeology, History, & Tanakh In The Palace Of The Torah…………………… 24 Concluding Thoughts……………………………………………………………….. 29 PDF compiled and designed by Devir Kahan from the original series on Daf Aleph. dafaleph.com !2 of !31 Introduction Not too long ago Professor Yoram Hazony wrote an article critiquing the approach to Biblical Criticism taken by Open Orthodoxy — or at least by the Open Orthodox community he had spent a shabbat with. It’s an excellent article; one that admits to being a product of the author’s subjective experience, while still being bold enough to pose challenging questions. The main thrust of these questions, and of the article as a whole, was regarding the statement made by the Rabbi of the community that what set Open Orthodoxy apart was its willingness to confront challenging issues, such as Biblical Criticism, and to struggle with them honestly (presumably in contrast to the rest of the Jewish Community). Prof. Hazony’s article paints a picture quite at odds with this statement, a picture where anything less than absolute acceptance of Biblical Criticism is completely unacceptable, wherein even questioning Biblical Criticism merits an immediate and condescending dismissal. The article concludes by comparing Open Orthodoxy to the Protestant Movement, which a century ago decided to accept Biblical Criticism, and has paid the price for it.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanism and Hebraism: Christian Scholars and Hebrew Sources in the Renaissance
    Humanism and Hebraism: Christian Scholars and Hebrew Sources in the Renaissance Kathryn Christine Puzzanghera Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Prerequisite for Honors in Religion April 2016 © 2016 Kathryn C. Puzzanghera, All Rights Reserved This thesis is dedicated to the glory of God Who gave us reason, creativity, and curiosity, that they might be used AND To the mixed Protestant-Catholic family I was born into, and the Jewish family we chose Table of Contents Chapter I: Christian Humanist Hebraism in Context .................................... 1 Christian Thought and Biblical Exegesis ......................................................................... 8 Jewish-Christian Dialogue and Anti-Semitism .............................................................. 17 Scholastics and Humanists in dialogue .......................................................................... 29 Christian Hebraists: Medieval Exegetes, Renaissance Humanists, and Protestant Reformers ....................................................................................................................... 43 Renaissance Hebraists: Nicholas of Lyra, Johannes Reuchlin, and Philip Melanchthon ........................................................................................................................................ 55 Chapter II: Nicholas of Lyra ...........................................................................58 Nicholas in Dialogue: Influences and Critiques ............................................................. 71 Nicholas’s
    [Show full text]
  • Misquoting Jesus the Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why 1St Edition Pdf
    FREE MISQUOTING JESUS THE STORY BEHIND WHO CHANGED THE BIBLE AND WHY 1ST EDITION PDF Bart D Ehrman | 9780060859510 | | | | | Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why by Bart D. Ehrman See what's new with book lending at the Internet Archive. Better World Books. Uploaded by Tracey. Gutierres on February 11, Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass. User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up Log in. Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book. Books Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio Software icon An illustration of a 3. Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs. Images Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses. Misquoting Jesus : the story behind who changed the Bible and why Item Preview. EMBED for wordpress. Want more? Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! Includes bibliographical references p. For almost years these manuscripts were hand copied by scribes who were influenced by the cultural, theological and political disputes of their day. Both mistakes and intentional changes abound in the surviving manuscripts, making the original words difficult to reconstruct. Ehrman reveals where and why these changes were made and Misquoting Jesus The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why 1st edition scholars go about reconstructing the original words of the New Testament as closely as possible. He makes the provocative case that many of our cherished biblical stories and beliefs stem Misquoting Jesus The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why 1st edition both intentional and accidental alterations by scribes--alterations that dramatically affected subsequent versions.
    [Show full text]
  • 006. Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible, History of Text
    Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible, Methodology Textual criticism deals with the nature and origin of all the witnesses of a composition or text—in our case the biblical books. This analysis often involves an attempt to discover the original form of details in a composition, or even of large stretches of text, although what exactly constitutes an “original text” (or “original texts”) is debatable. In the course of this inquiry, attempts are made to describe how the texts were written, changed, and transmitted from one generation to the next. People who express a view on the originality of readings do so while evaluating their comparative value. This comparison— the central area of the textual praxis—refers to the value of the readings (variants) included in the textual witnesses. However, not all differences should be subjected to a textual evaluation. In our view, (groups of) readings that were produced at the literary growth stage of the biblical books (editorial variants) should not be subjected to textual evaluation, since they were not produced during the course of the transmission of texts. This definition does not refer specifically to the traditional text of Hebrew–Aramaic Scripture, the so-called Masoretic Text (MT), but rather to all forms of Scripture. One of the practical results of the analysis of textual data is that it creates tools for interpreting Hebrew and Aramaic Scriptures. Interpretation is based on a text or texts and can only proceed if the nature of that text has been determined. By the same token, all other disciplines, such as the historical, geographical, and linguistic analysis of Scripture, operate from a text base.
    [Show full text]