Misquoting Jesus: the Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why Pdf

FREE MISQUOTING JESUS: THE STORY BEHIND WHO CHANGED THE BIBLE AND WHY PDF

An accomplished scholar of early Christianity, Ehrman religious studies, Univ. He sketches the development of New Testament literature, the gradual accumulation of errors therein through the accidental or intentional revisions of copyists, and attempts beginning with Erasmus in the 16th century to reconstruct the original text. Since mainstream study editions of the Bible have long drawn attention to the existence of alternate readings, the Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why well-informed reader will not find much revolutionary analysis here. Recommended for all public libraries. The popular perception of the Bible as a divinely perfect book receives scant support from Ehrman, who sees in Holy Writ ample evidence of human fallibility and ecclesiastical politics. Though himself schooled in evangelical literalism, Ehrman has come to regard his earlier faith in the inerrant inspiration of the Bible as misguided, given that the original texts have disappeared and that the extant texts available do not agree with one another. Most of the textual discrepancies, Ehrman acknowledges, matter little, but some do profoundly affect religious doctrine. To assess how ignorant or theologically manipulative scribes may have changed the biblical text, modern scholars have developed procedures for comparing diverging texts. And in language accessible to nonspecialists, Ehrman explains these procedures and their results. He further explains why textual criticism has frequently sparked intense controversy, especially among scripture-alone Protestants. In discounting not only the authenticity of existing manuscripts but also the inspiration of the original writers, Ehrman will deeply divide his readers. Although he addresses a popular audience, he undercuts the very religious attitudes that have made the Bible a popular book. Still, this is a useful overview for biblical history collections. All rights reserved. Facebook Twitter YouTube. Accidental or Intentional Revisions of Copyists. From Booklist The popular perception of the Bible as a divinely perfect book receives scant support from Ehrman, who sees in Holy Writ ample evidence of human fallibility and ecclesiastical politics. Go to Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why. Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why - Bart D. Ehrman - Google книги

Denver Seminary prepares men and women to engage the needs of the world with the redemptive power of the gospel and the life-changing truth of Scripture. Want to learn more about our academic degree programs? As you consider seminary, let us guide you through the process. We have a team of admissions counselors who are ready to assist you in any way you need. Here you will find one-stop shop for students to get connected to activities that will feed your spiritual and social life as well as equip you with resources to jump-start your academic career. Denver Seminary has a wealth of resources that are available to current students, alumni, and the Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why community. Here you will find access to the Denver Journal, Engage Magazineand the various initiatives organized by the Seminary. Bart D. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, ISBN It is uncanny how similar Bart Ehrman's and my backgrounds are. I had pieced some bits together from his other writings, but here he takes a fifteen-page introduction to tell his story. We both graduated from high school in We both went on to small, private church-related undergraduate colleges in Illinois he to Moody Bible Institue; I to Augustana Collegethen to Chicagoland evangelical schools he to Wheaton; I to Trinityand finally to internationally known university with prestigious divinity schools for Ph. Ehrman has taught for a considerable time now at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill and become a prolific author of many widely selling books; Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why have done likewise here at Denver Seminary. I can also tell from his writings that Bart has a wonderful but slightly sick sense of humor that I suspect is very similar to mine! Today, nevertheless, Ehrman has distinguished himself as someone who at Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why the scholarly and popular levels loves to poke fun at conservative Christianity. He has rejected his evangelicalism and whether he is writing on the history of the transmission of the biblical text, focusing on all the changes that scribes made over the centuries, or on the so-called "lost gospels" and "lost Christianities," trying to rehabilitate our appreciation for Gnosticism, it is clear that he has an axe to grind. At times Ehrman wields it seemingly just playfully. Thus, in his book-length work on the historical Jesus published by no less than Oxford University Press, while illustrating how words change their meaning over time, he uses the example of "dude," which once meant a cowboy or a "pretty boy"then became the equivalent of "man," and now is just an exclamation at the beginning of a sentence. But he inserts into his discussion how he disgusted his son by explaining that the term was also once used for camels' gonads! Most of Misquoting Jesus is actually a very readable, accurate distillation of many of the most important facts about the nature and history of textual criticism, presented in a lively and interesting narrative that will keep scholarly and lay interest alike. In this respect, the title appears designed to attract attention and sell copies of the book rather than to represent its contents accurately! A brief conclusion returns to his personal story, reiterating how, in light of the numerous changes that preclude us from saying we either have the original texts or can perfectly reconstruct them, he finds it impossible to hold to biblical inerrancy or inspiration or even less strict forms of evangelical Christian faith and insinuates without ever saying so in so many worlds that reasonable persons should come to similar conclusions. Thus a substantial majority of this book provides information already well-known and well-accessible in other sources, such as Bruce Metzger's works on the text and transmission of the New Testament including one that Ehrman himself recently helped to revisebut in slightly more popular form that is likely to reach a wider audience. What most distinguishes the work are the spins Ehrman puts on some of the data at numerous junctures and his propensity for focusing on the most drastic of all the changes in the history of the text, leaving the uninitiated likely to think there are numerous additional examples of various phenomena he discusses when there are not. Thus his first extended examples of textual problems in the New Testament are the woman caught in adultery and the longer ending of Mark. After demonstrating how neither of these is likely to be part of the originals of either Gospel, Ehrman concedes that "most of the changes are not of this magnitude" p. But this sounds as if there are at least a few others that are of similar size, when in fact there are no other textual variants anywhere that are even one-fourth as long as these thirteen- and twelve-verse additions. A second supposition necessary for Ehrman's case is that the non-professional scribes that he postulates did most of the copying of New Testament documents until the fourth-century, when Constantine became the first emperor to commission new copies of the Bible, did not do nearly as careful a job as the professional scribes that he postulates did most of the post-Constantinian copying. Ehrman's discussion of Erasmus and the famous Johannine Comma 1 John is both lucid and entertaining. But, again, what is lacking is any acknowledgment that there is no other known example in all of the history of textual criticism of a similar insertion to a Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why Greek text being made on the basis of only one, most likely altered, late medieval manuscript. Moreover, Ehrman writes as if the doctrine of the Trinity stands or falls with this spurious addition, which ignores the numerous other Trinitarian references in the New Testament. One of the most valuable and least duplicated parts of the book comes in the chapters that discuss theologically and sociologically motivated changes. Ehrman's revision to Metzger's standard textbook introduces several of these as well, though Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why briefly, but most primers on the discipline largely ignore them. It is very helpful to understand how Mark's probable reference to Jesus' anger Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why Mark rather than compassion fits his overall presentation of Jesus, just as Luke's original "omission" of Jesus sweating great drops of blood in the garden in Luke reflects his picture of a more "imperturbable" Christ. Ehrman's suggestion that Hebrews originally read that Christ tasted death "apart from God" rather than "by the grace of God" seemingly founders on the sheer paucity of external evidence for the reading. But if Origen was right that the reading stood in the majority of manuscripts of his day, then perhaps it was original. No unorthodox theology results recall the cry of dereliction in the Gospelsbut one can see why the vast majority of scribess would have adopted the reading that is far better known today. Perhaps the only example in Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why chapters that is altogether unconvincing, notwithstanding evangelical scholar Gordon Fee's having championed it, is the idea that 1 Corinthians was missing from Paul's original text, simply because a few very late manuscripts have moved the verses to the end of the chapter where they flow much more naturallyand because a few older manuscripts include marginal signs that might point to some kind of textual question but even this could be adequately accounted for by doubts about the location of the verses. Few textual critics of any theological stripe including Fee elsewhere accept as probable suggestions that the originals of any New Testament book read differently from all known copies, because of the sheer number and antiquity of the copies that we have, until a passage becomes too awkward for their overall theological systems and even then most seek some other resolution of the tension than textual emendation. One surprising factual error occurs when Ehrman insists that Acts means that Peter and John were illiterate the term agrammatos "unlettered" in this context means not educated beyond the elementary education accessible to most first-century Jewish boys. But otherwise, the most disappointing feature of the volume is Ehrman's apparent unawareness of or else his unwillingness to discuss the difference between inductive and deductive approaches to Scripture. The Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why evangelical formulations of inspiration and inerrancy have never claimed that these are doctrines that arise from the examination of the data of the existing texts. They are theological corollaries that follow naturally from the conviction that God is the author of the texts itself suggested by 2 Tim. But if the texts are "God-breathed," and if God cannot err, then they must be inspired and inerrant. Ehrman offers no supporting arguments for his claims that if God inspired the originals, he both could have and should have inerrantly preserved them in all subsequent copies. It would have been a far greater miracle to supernaturally guide every copyist and translator throughout history than to inspire one set of original authors, and in the process it probably would have violated the delicate balance between the humanity and divinity of the Bible analogous to the humanity and divinity of Christ. All that is necessary Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why for us to have reason to believe that we can reconstruct something remarkably close to the originals, and we have evidence for that in abundance. No central tenet of Christianity hangs on any textually uncertain passage; this observation alone means that Christian textual critics may examine the variants that do exist dispassionately and without worrying that their faith is somehow threatened in the ways that Ehrman came to believe. So what was the biggest difference between Bart's and my religious and educational experiences? It would appear that it was our undergraduate tutelage. I went to a liberal Lutheran liberal arts college that was rapidly changing its approach to religious studies to try to conform to the secular university model, despite its Christian heritage, yet my studies demonstrated to me that it was needlessly running too fast too far. Ehrman went to Moody, which one of my profs at Augustana in the s called the "control group" for a longitudinal study of the teaching of religious studies Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why Illinois colleges and universities in which I participated as a college senior. Only slightly tongue in cheek, he called it the one school that had not changed any of its views since the nineteenth century. Ehrman recognized the overly conservative and insufficiently accurate positions that he was at times taught there, and he too rebelled against unnecessarily narrow and dogmatic professors, only on the right side of the theological spectrum rather than on the left. Yet I can still hear my eighth grade history teacher, herself once a local Republican politician, repeating again and again, "The far left and the far right: avoid them both, like the plague! Our entire family, however, can thank Bart for one wonderful illustration of the occasional problem of word-division that confronts interpreters of manuscripts that print words together without spaces -- " lastnightatdinnerIsawabundanceonthetable " p. This illustration will now go down in Blomberg family lore because of certain forms of dancing our girls have invented when I showed the word cluster to them. And who knows? Perhaps Bart was thinking only of a piece of bread! Craig L. Tags: bart, ehrman, review, misquoting, jesus, craig, blomberg, denver, seminary, journal. About Back. Contact Us Newsroom Employment Accreditation. Contact Us! Current Students Here you will find one-stop shop for students to get connected to activities that will feed your spiritual and social life as well as equip you with resources to jump-start your academic career. Library About the Carey S. Craig Blomberg. Ehrman on February 01, About the Author Bart D. Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why – Bart D Ehrman

When world-class biblical scholar Bart Ehrman first began to study the texts of the Bible in their original languages he was startled to discover the Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why of mistakes and intentional alterations that had been made by earlier translators. In Misquoting Jesus, Ehrman tells the story behind the mistakes and changes that ancient scribes made to the New Testament and shows Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible and Why great impact they had upon the Bible we use today. He frames his account with personal reflections on how his study of the Greek manuscripts made him abandon his once ultraconservative views of the Bible. Since the advent of the printing press and the accurate reproduction of texts, most people have assumed that when they read the New Testament they are reading an exact copy of Jesus's words or Saint Paul's writings. And yet, for almost fifteen hundred years these manuscripts were hand copied by scribes who were deeply influenced by the cultural, theological, and political disputes of their day. Both mistakes and intentional changes abound in the surviving manuscripts, making the original words difficult to reconstruct. For the first time, Ehrman reveals where and why these changes were made and how scholars go about reconstructing the original words of the New Testament as closely as possible. Ehrman makes the provocative case that many of our cherished biblical stories and widely held beliefs concerning the divinity of Jesus, the Trinity, and the divine origins of the Bible itself stem from both intentional and accidental alterations by scribes - - alterations that dramatically affected all subsequent versions of the Bible. Ehrman lays out the evidence that the words that you're liable to read in the Bible aint necessarily Bart Ehrman knows the ancient languages and texts, and makes Bart D. Ehrman is one of the most renowned and controversial Bible scholars in the world today. He is the James A. He lives in Durham, North Carolina. Visit the author online at www. CowanDavid G.