DOCSLIB.ORG

FULL LIST of WINNERS the 8Th International Children's Art Contest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FULL LIST of WINNERS the 8Th International Children's Art Contest FULL LIST of WINNERS The 8th International Children's Art Contest "Anton Chekhov and Heroes of his Works" GRAND PRIZE Margarita Vitinchuk, aged 15 Novocherkassk, Rostov Oblast, Russia for “The Lucky One” Age Group: 14-17 years olds 1st place awards: Anna Lavrinenko, aged 14 Novocherkassk, Rostov Oblast, Russia for “Ward No. 6” Xenia Grishina, aged 16 Gatchina, Leningrad Oblast, Russia for “Chameleon” Hei Yiu Lo, aged 17 Hongkong for “The Wedding” Anastasia Valchuk, aged 14 Prokhladniy, Kabardino-Balkar Republic, Russia for “Ward Number 6” Yekaterina Kharagezova, aged 15 Novocherkassk, Rostov Oblast, Russia for “Portrait of Anton Chekhov” Yulia Kovalevskaya, aged 14 Prokhladniy, Kabardino-Balkar Republic, Russia for “Oversalted” Valeria Medvedeva, aged 15 Serov, Sverdlovsk Oblast, Russia for “Melancholy” Maria Pelikhova, aged 15 Penza, Russia for “Ward Number 6” 1 2nd place awards: Anna Pratsyuk, aged 15 Omsk, Russia for “Fat and Thin” Maria Markevich, aged 14 Gomel, Byelorussia for “An Important Conversation” Yekaterina Kovaleva, aged 15 Omsk, Russia for “The Man in the Case” Anastasia Dolgova, aged 15 Prokhladniy, Kabardino-Balkar Republic, Russia for “Happiness” Tatiana Stepanova, aged 16 Novocherkassk, Rostov Oblast, Russia for “Kids” Katya Goncharova, aged 14 Gatchina, Leningrad Oblast, Russia for “Chekhov Reading Out His Stories” Yiu Yan Poon, aged 16 Hongkong for “Woman’s World” 3rd place awards: Alexander Ovsienko, aged 14 Taganrog, Russia for “A Hunting Accident” Yelena Kapina, aged 14 Penza, Russia for “About Love” Yelizaveta Serbina, aged 14 Prokhladniy, Kabardino-Balkar Republic, Russia for “Chameleon” Yekaterina Dolgopolova, aged 16 Sovetsk, Kaliningrad Oblast, Russia for “The Black Monk” Yelena Tyutneva, aged 15 Sayansk, Irkutsk Oblast, Russia for “Fedyushka and Kashtanka” Daria Novikova, aged 14 Smolensk, Russia for “The Man in a Case” 2 Masha Chizhova, aged 15 Gatchina, Russia for “Ward No. 6” Maria Apeykina, aged 15 Orsha, Vitebsk Oblast, Byelorussia for “A Horesey Name” Age Group: 11-13 years olds 1st place awards: Appolinaria Kulyavtseva, aged 11 Karaganda, Kazakhstan for “Chekhov on Vacation” Diana Ushakova, aged 11 Rostov on Don, Russia for “Uncle Vanya” Diana Kazarinova, aged 13 Omsk, Russia for “Kashtanka” Victoria Pashenko, aged 12 Omsk, Russia for “Dragonfly” Sophia Bogoyavlenskaya, aged 11 Kalachinsk, Omsk Oblast, Russia for “Portrait of Anton Chekhov” Nikita Pankov, aged 12 Sterlitamak, Bashkiria, Russia for “Kashtanka” Evi Atanasova, aged 11 Bulgaria for “Portrait of Anton Chekhov” 2nd place awards: Regina Akhmadulina, aged 12 Ufa, Bashkiria, Russia for “Anton Chekhov in Yalta” Nadya Avdeenko, aged 13 Taganrog, Russia for “The Bear” Anastasia Boykova, aged 12 Shakhty, Russia for “The Lady with the Dog” 3 Karina Rakhimova, aged 12 Sterlitamak, Bashkiria, Russia for “The Album” Yana Pozdina, aged 12 Serov, Sverdlovsk Oblast, Russia for “Kashtanka” Anna Naumova, aged 12 Togliatti, Russia for “A Malefactor” Zavzhat Gapizova, aged 11 Makhachkala, Dagestan, Russia for “Kashtanka” 3rd place awards: Alina Antishina, aged 13 Tula, Russia for “Chameleon” Malvina Klochkova, aged 11 Kushva, Sverdlovsk Oblast, Russia for “Chameleon” Melania Bondarenko, aged 12 Rostov on Don, Russia for “The Death of a Civil Servant” Yulia Mikhailova, aged 11 Taishet, Irkutsk Oblast, Russia for “Vanka” Anna Plotnikova, aged 13 Kalachinsk, Omsk Oblast, Russia for “Portrait of Anton Chekhov” Anna Khlopetskaya, aged 13 Taganrog, Russia for “Premiere” Angelina Solodkaya, aged 13 Gomel, Byelorussia for “On a Summer Day” Maria Puerto Fullana, aged 12 Mallorca, Spain for “The Cherry Orchard” 4 Age Group: 7-10 years olds 1st place awards: Daria Karmazina, aged 10 Prokhladniy, Kabardino-Balkar Republic, Russia for “Kashtanka on Circus Arena” Yegor Ponomarev, aged 10 Pavlodar, Kazakhstan for “Kashtanka’s Dream” Anna Titenok, aged 9 Gomel, Byelorussia for “Tea Party” Ksenia Fomina, aged 10 Taganrog, Russia for “Sweatheart” Daria Bulgakova, aged 10 Berdsk, Novosibirsk Oblast, Russia for “Melancholy” Arina Belyakova, aged 8 Moscow, Russia for “The White-Fronted” Yana Kravchenko, aged 10 Pavlodar, Kazakhstan for “Kashtanka’s Misfortune” Arthur Bendar, aged 10 Pavlodar, Kazakhstan for “An Unexpected Meeting” Tanya Shabarova, aged 10 Balakhna, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, Russia for “The White-Fronted” Alexander Farulin, aged 7 Gatchina, Leningrad Oblast, Russia for “The White-Fronted” 2nd place awards: Christina Chernopai, aged 10 Pavlodar, Kazakhstan for “The Lost Friend” Yevgeniya Mukhametshina, aged 7 Sterlitamak, Bashkiria, Russia for “Kashtanka With Her New Friends” 5 Yekaterina Antipova, aged 8 Moscow, Russia for “Anton Chekhov in Melikhovo” Georgy Khasanov, aged 8 Sterlitamak, Bashkiria, Russia for “Vanka” Yekaterina Durvoskaya, aged 8 Moscow, Russia for “The White-Fronted” Vlad Semenchenko, aged 10 Taganrog, Russia for “The Man in a Case” Marina Kostenko, aged 10 Pavlodar, Kazakhstan for “The Night Without the Master” 3rd place awards: Ksenia Kalenik, aged 7 Ekibastuz, Pavlodar Oblast, Kazakhstan for “A Naughty Boy” Anastasia Khronyuk, aged 9 Aksai, Rostov Oblast, Russia for “Kashtanka’s Got Lost” Sophia Tyushevskaya, aged 7 Togliatti, Russia for “Circus” Paulina Nikitina, aged 8 Rostov on Don, Russia for “Joy” Vika Nikiforova & Dana Latova, aged 8 Taganrog, Russia for “Wolf Cubs and The White-Fronted” Alexandra Smirnova, aged 10 Pavlodar, Kazakhstan for “Loss of The Only Master” Yekaterina Lyasotskaya, aged 8 Novoshashtinsk, Russia for “Portrait of Anton Chekhov” Ulyana Fuzhenko, aged 9 Khatsyzsk, Donetsk Peoples’ Republic for “Kashtanka” 6 Carolina Kolosova, aged 9 Omsk, Russia for “Arena Lights” Age Group: 4-6 years olds 1st place awards: Pavel Chernysh, aged 6 Taganrog, Russia for “Kashtanka” Mark Melikhov, aged 4 Komsomolsk-on-Amur, Khabarovsk Krai, Russia for “The Lady with the Dog” Chang Win Qi, aged 6 Hongkong for “Portrait of Anton Chekhov” 2nd place awards: Anna Kovaleva, aged 5 Ekibastuz, Pavlodar Oblast, Kazakhstan for “Grisha” Milana Kulakova, aged 5 Ekibastuz, Pavlodar Oblast, Kazakhstan for “Fat and Thin” Valeria Arzumanova, aged 5 Taganrog, Russia for “Kashtanka Meets Fyodor Timopheevich” Damir Aidagulov, aged 6 Ekibastuz, Pavlodar Oblast, Kazakhstan for “Anna on the Neck” 3rd place awards: Liza Prinda, aged 7 Taganrog, Russia for “Portrait of Anton Chekhov” Veronica Grishko, aged 6 Taganrog, Russia for “No longer Kasthanka, but Auntie” Yelizaveta Melnichuk, aged 4 Komsomolsk-on-Amur, Khabarovsk Krai, Russia for “Kashtanka’s Performance” 7 Encouragement prizes Angelina Clara Kallawat, aged 13 Surabaya, Indonesia for “Lady Playing with a Dog” Hong Se Qi, aged 10 Hongkong for “My Wonderful Travel to Sakhalin” Alina Tselykh, aged 15 Omsk, Russia for “Gooseberries” Aida Basyrova, aged 10 Sterlitamak, Bashkiria, Russia for “The White-Fronted” Paulina Sergienko, aged 10 Ekibastuz, Pavlodar Oblast, Kazakhstan for “The Lady with the Dog” Sophia Andreeva, aged 7 Taganrog, Russia for “Kashtanka Getting Lost” Sophia Polozova, aged 7 Saransk, Russia for “Portrait of Anton Chekhov” Anna Aksyonova, aged 7 Taganrog, Russia for “Taganrog – Home City of Anton Chekhov” Anna Provorova, aged 11 Gatchina, Leningrad Oblast, Russia for “Oversalted” Valeria Sukonnikova, aged 11 Pavlodar, Kazakhstan for “Friends Training” Amina Silakova, aged 12 Khartsyzsk, Donetsk Peoples’ Republic for “Sources of Inspiration” Maria Panteleeva, aged 11 Aksai, Russia for “Anton Chekhov and Heroes of his Works” Alicia Pakhomova, aged 16 Orsha, Vitebsk Oblast, Byelorussia for “Daughter of Albion” 8 Valeria Melkozerova, aged 11 Kushva, Sverdlovsk Oblast, Russia for “Surgery” Valeria Shamsutdinova, aged 16 Ufa, Bashkiria, Russia for “Vanka” Arts & Crafts 1st place awards: Karina Dvoryaninova, aged 16 Malpis, Latvia for “Memories” Anastasia Korobochkina, aged 14 Berdsk, Novosibirsk Oblast, Russia for “On a Holy Night” 2nd place awards: Maria Belmova, aged 13 Taganrog, Russia for “The Cherry Orchard” Arina Reznikova, aged 10 Pokrovskoe, Rostov Oblast, Russia for “Chekhov and Heroes of His Works” 3rd place awards: Veronica Dyakonova, aged 13 Berdsk, Novosibirsk Oblast, Russia for “Vanka” Certificates of participation: Victoria Pakhomova, aged 14 Taganrog, Russia for “Burbot” Mikhail Klimov, aged 13 Roslavl, Smolensk Oblast, Russia for “Enigmatic Person” Sophia Lyamina, aged 14 Berdsk, Novosibirsk Oblast, Russia for “Old House” 9 Daria Mordvina, aged 12 Taishet, Irkutsk Oblast, Russia for “The Lady with the Dog” Yekaterina Trubnikova, aged 14 Penza, Russia for “Fat and Thin” Larisa Rykova, aged 15 Petrovskaya, Krasnodar Krai, Russia for “Grasshopper” Sergey Sloboda, aged 8 Taganrog, Russia for “Portrait of Anton Chekhov” Olesya Yakovleva, aged 13 Taganrog, Russia for “The Man in the Case” Kristina Kadobnova, aged 11 Prokhladniy, Kabardino-Balkar Republic, Russia for “Fat and Thin” Oydin Avduvokhid Kizi Ulugova, aged 17 Zarmitan, Samarkand Oblast, Uzbekistan for “Portrait of Anton Chekhov” Simona Nering, aged 10 Guetersloh, Germany for “Kashtanka Goes to Circus” Veselina Ivanova, aged 13 Targovishte, Bulgaria for “The Lady with the Dog” Kirill Guyot, aged 5 Switzerland for “Kashtanka in the Circus” Anastasia Apelt, aged 11 Guetersloh, Germany for “A Naughty Boy” Kritay Daga, aged 11 Maharashtra, India for “The Lady with the Dog” Matchima Chutijirawong, aged 15 Bangkok, Thailand for “Anton Chekhov” Anastasia Sviridenko, aged 14 Gomel, Byelorussia for “In the Morning” 10 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critical Analysis of the Roles of Women in the Lais of Marie De France
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1976 Critical analysis of the roles of women in the Lais of Marie de France Jeri S. Guthrie The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Guthrie, Jeri S., "Critical analysis of the roles of women in the Lais of Marie de France" (1976). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1941. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1941 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ROLES OF WOMEN IN THE LAIS OF MARIE DE FRANCE By Jeri S. Guthrie B.A., University of Montana, 1972 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1976 Approved by: Chairmah, Board of Exami iradua4J^ School [ Date UMI Number EP35846 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT OissHEH'tfttkffl Pk^islw^ UMI EP35846 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012).
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Thin, white, and saved : fat stigma and the fear of the big black body Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/55p6h2xt Author Strings, Sabrina A. Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Thin, White, and Saved: Fat Stigma and the Fear of the Big Black Body A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by Sabrina A. Strings Committee in charge: Professor Maria Charles, Co-Chair Professor Christena Turner, Co-Chair Professor Camille Forbes Professor Jeffrey Haydu Professor Lisa Park 2012 Copyright Sabrina A. Strings, 2012 All rights reserved The dissertation of Sabrina A. Strings is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Co-Chair Co-Chair University of California, San Diego 2012 i i i DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my grandmother, Alma Green, so that she might have an answer to her question. i v TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE …………………………………..…………………………….…. iii DEDICATION …...…....................................................................................................... iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………....................v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS …………………...…………………………………….…...vi VITA…………………………..…………………….……………………………….…..vii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION………………….……....................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Russian and Slavonic Studies 2016-17 Module Name Chekhov Module Id (To Be Confirmed) RUS4?? Course Year JS
    Department of Russian and Slavonic Studies 2016-17 Module Name Chekhov Module Id (to be confirmed) RUS4?? Course Year JS TSM,SH SS TSM, SH Optional/Mandatory Optional Semester(s) MT Contact hour per week 2 contact hours/week; total 22 hours Private study (hours per week) 100 hours Lecturer(s) Justin Doherty ECTs 10 ECTs Aims This module surveys Chekhov’s writing in both short-story and dramatic forms. While some texts from Chekhov’s early period will be included, the focus will be on works from the later 1880s, 1890s and early 1900s. Attention will be given to the social and historical circumstances which form the background to Chekhov’s writings, as well as to major influences on Chekhov’s writing, notably Tolstoy. In examining Chekhov’s major plays, we will also look closely at Chekhov’s involvement with the Moscow Arts Theatre and theatre director and actor Konstantin Stanislavsky. Set texts will include: 1. Short stories ‘Rural’ narratives: ‘Steppe’, ‘Peasants’, ‘In the Ravine’ Psychological stories: ‘Ward No 6’, ‘The Black Monk’, ‘The Bishop’, ‘A Boring Story’ Stories of gentry life: ‘House with a Mezzanine’, ‘The Duel’, ‘Ariadna’ Provincial stories: ‘My Life’, ‘Ionych’, ‘Anna on the Neck’, ‘The Man in a Case’ Late ‘optimistic’ stories: ‘The Lady with the Dog’, ‘The Bride’ 2. Plays The Seagull Uncle Vanya Three Sisters The Cherry Orchard Note on editions: for the stories, I recommend the Everyman edition, The Chekhov Omnibus: Selected Stories, tr. Constance Garnett, revised by Donald Rayfield, London: J. M. Dent, 1994. There are numerous other translations e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussing Chekhov's Stories. OLLI Berkeley, Fall 2018. Syllabus Course Description: While Being Famous Worldwide Mostly As a Pl
    Discussing Chekhov's stories. OLLI Berkeley, Fall 2018. Syllabus Course description: While being famous worldwide mostly as a playwright, in Russia A.Chekhov is better known and more loved for his short stories, many of which are considered to be masterpieces of the genre. This discussion course offers an insight into some of his best stories and novellas, covering a wide spectrum of themes. Discussing the ideas, plots and characters, we will pay close attention to Chekhovian style and look at the language resources employed to render his ideas and attitudes. Recommended book (available on Amazon): Selected stories of Anton Chekhov, translated by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokonsky. Modern Library, NY, 2000. WEEK 1. Part I. Introductory talk. Before the class please watch a 20 min. documentary «Anton Chekhov» on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAAAIWeCi-Y In class we will discuss how Chekhov’s life and personality are reflected in his stories. I will make a brief introduction to his style and creative method, as well as an overview of the major themes and characters in his stories. Part II. Discussing the stories: 1) “The Death of a Clerk”. 2) “A Chameleon” (not in the book; the text and assignments will be posted on the course site) 3) “The Student” (assignment posted) Week 2. Read the following stories (assignments will be posted on the course site): 1) At Christmastime 2) The Bishop Week 3. Read the following stories (assignments will be posted on the course site): 1) Sleepy 2) Rothschild’s Fiddle Week 4. Read the following stories: 1) Peasants (not in the book; the text and questions for discussion will be posted) 2) In the Ravine (assignment posted) Week5.
    [Show full text]
  • O MAGIC LAKE Чайкаthe ENVIRONMENT of the SEAGULL the DACHA Дать Dat to Give
    “Twilight Moon” by Isaak Levitan, 1898 O MAGIC LAKE чайкаTHE ENVIRONMENT OF THE SEAGULL THE DACHA дать dat to give DEFINITION датьA seasonal or year-round home in “Russian Dacha or Summer House” by Karl Ivanovich Russia. Ranging from shacks to cottages Kollman,1834 to villas, dachas have reflected changes in property ownership throughout Russian history. In 1894, the year Chekhov wrote The Seagull, dachas were more commonly owned by the “new rich” than ever before. The characters in The Seagull more likely represent the class of the intelligencia: artists, authors, and actors. FUN FACTS Dachas have strong connections with nature, bringing farming and gardening to city folk. A higher class Russian vacation home or estate was called a Usad’ba. Dachas were often associated with adultery and debauchery. 1 HISTORYистория & ARCHITECTURE история istoria history дать HISTORY The term “dacha” originally referred to “The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia” by the land given to civil servants and war Alphonse Mucha heroes by the tsar. In 1861, Tsar Alexander II abolished serfdom in Russia, and the middle class was able to purchase dwellings built on dachas. These people were called dachniki. Chekhov ridiculed dashniki. ARCHITECTURE Neoclassicism represented intelligence An example of 19th century and culture, so aristocrats of this time neoclassical architecture attempted to reflect this in their architecture. Features of neoclassical architecture include geometric forms, simplicity in structure, grand scales, dramatic use of Greek columns, Roman details, and French windows. Sorin’s estate includes French windows, and likely other elements of neoclassical style. Chekhov’s White Dacha in Melikhovo, 1893 МéлиховоMELIKHOVO Мéлихово Meleekhovo Chekhov’s estate WHITE Chekhov’s house was called “The White DACHA Dacha” and was on the Melikhovo estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Features of Microelement Composition of Ordinary Chernozems of the Azov and Lower Don Regions
    American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences Research Articles Features of Microelement Composition of Ordinary Chernozems of the Azov and Lower Don Regions 1Tatiana M. Minkina, 2Nikolay N. Miroshnichenko, 2Aleksandr I. Fateev, 3Galina V. Motuzova, 1Saglara S. Mandzhieva, 1Svetlana N. Sushkova and 1Olga A. Biryukova 1Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, 344090, prosp. Stachki, 194/1, Russia 2Sokolovskii Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry, Ukrainian Academy of Agrarian Sciences, ul. Chaikovskogo 4, Kharkiv, 61024 Ukraine 3Lomonosov Moscow State University, Soil Science Faculty, Moscow, 119991, Vorobjevy Gory, Russia Article history Abstract: Ordinary chernozems in the Azov Plain have a low background Received: 24-02-2015 content of mobile zinc compounds, a sufficient supply with copper and an Revised: 4-03-2015 increased content of lead compounds. This specificity of the regional Accepted: 10-7-2015 microelement composition is due to the high carbonate content in the soil profiles, the natural enrichment of littoral geochemical landscapes and the Corresponding Author: Saglara Sergeevna Mandzhieva effect of the significant sources of microelement emission (Mariupol Southern Federal University, metallurgical enterprises, Novocherkassk regional power station, etc.). Rostov-on-Don, 344090, prosp. The high buffer capacity of soils in the Azov region significantly Stachki, 194/1, Russia mitigates the negative effects of pollution. Email: [email protected] Keywords: Background Content, Chernozems, Emission, Microelements, Pollution Introduction and viticulture (Minkina et al ., 2010) and the near coastal markets ensure the increased economic Soil is the main source of trace elements for plants attractiveness of these agrarian branches. However, the both as micronutrients and pollutants. The origin of trace saturation of the region with industrial objects elements influences their behavior in soils and therefore significantly affected the microelement composition of the controls to some extent their bioavailability.
    [Show full text]
  • WINTER 2019-2020 Advocacy Isssue
    VOL. XLVII NO. 2 / WINTER 2019-2020 ADVOCACY ISSSUE INSIDE: • IAFP 2020 LEGISlaTIVE PRIORITIES • 2019 ANNUAL CONFERENCE RECAP • 2020 EDUCATION PREVIEW “STRONG MEDICINE FOR IOWA” Des Moines, Des IA Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Iowa Moines, Des Permit No. 762 No. Permit PAID 100 East Grand, Suite 240 Suite Grand, East 100 ostage P US STD PRSRT Iowa Academy of Family Physicians Family of Academy Iowa A Good Night's Sleep can Make all the Difference. Our Board certified and Fellowship trained Sleep Medicine providers specialize in the treatment of all types of sleep disorders for adults and pediatrics, including sleep apnea, narcolepsy, insomnia, restless leg syndrome and many more. DSM Sleep Specialists, PLC 1275 NW 128th St, Suite 200 Clive, IA 50325 P 515-224-3948 F 515-224-2944 www.dsmsleepspecialists.com Table of Contents Vision Statement for the Iowa Academy of Family Physicians “Family Medicine will be the foundation for a healthier Iowa.” OFFICERS DISTRICT 4 Michael Lindstrom, D.O. President Mason City Sherry Bulten, M.D. Humboldt Mara Groom, D.O. Spirit Lake OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE IOWA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS President-elect Vol. XLVII No. 2 / WINTER 2019-2020 Lonny Miller, M.D. At-Large Creston Candice Smith, M.D. On The Cover: Knoxville (Left photo) IAFP Family Physician of (left) Dr. Jim Bell, Dr. Sherry Bulten Vice President Laura Bowshier, M.D. and Dr. Alan Schwartzstein. (right) (Melissa and Dr. David Nystrom) Urbandale Residency Representative Anthony Day, M.D. Secretary-Treasurer IN THIS ISSUE Jason Wilbur, M.D. Resident Members Iowa City Tyler Olson, M.D.
    [Show full text]
  • [Download Free Pdf] in the Ravine and Other Short Stories Online
    PQsbM [Download free pdf] In the Ravine and Other Short Stories Online [PQsbM.ebook] In the Ravine and Other Short Stories Pdf Free Anton Chekhov audiobook | *ebooks | Download PDF | ePub | DOC Download Now Free Download Here Download eBook #3925061 in Books 2016-06-07 2016-06-07Formats: Audiobook, MP3 Audio, UnabridgedOriginal language:EnglishPDF # 1 6.75 x .50 x 5.25l, Running time: 4 HoursBinding: Audio CD | File size: 78.Mb Anton Chekhov : In the Ravine and Other Short Stories before purchasing it in order to gage whether or not it would be worth my time, and all praised In the Ravine and Other Short Stories: 4 of 4 people found the following review helpful. In the Ravine: And Other Short StoriesBy Stephen BalbachEleven short stories and one novella (In the Ravine) by Anton Chekhov, as read by British actor Kenneth Branagh in 2002. The stories are:The Trousseau (1883)Fat and Thin (1883)Oh! the Public! (1885)Misery (1886)An Actor's End (1886)Children (1886)The Chorus Girl (1886)The Orator (1886)Hush! (1886)The Beggar (1887)A Story Without a Title (1888)Overall very good although it helps to read along with the text since some of the Russian vocabulary and names are difficult to track by audio alone. It is the Constance Garnett translation, freely available online. In the Ravine is the best, a wide and colorful portrait of peasant village life - a tragic story though. "Misery" is very good. "Children" does a good job at evoking childhood. "The Chorus Girl" is also well done. The CD says "Abridged" even though all the stories are Unabridged.6 of 6 people found the following review helpful.
    [Show full text]
  • Smoke Ivan Turgenev Smoke Ivan Turgenev
    Smoke Ivan Turgenev Smoke Ivan Turgenev Translated by Constance Garnett THE NAMES OF THE CHARACTERS IN THE BOOK Grigóry [Grísha] Mihálovitch Litvínov. Tat-yána [Tánya] Petróvna Shestóv. Kapitolína Márkovna. Rostisláv Bambáev. Semyón Yákovlevitch Voroshílov. Stepán Nikoláevitch Gubar-yóv. Matróna Semyónovna Suhántchikov. Tit Bindásov. Pish-Tchálkin. Sozónt Ivánitch Potúgin. Irína Pávlovna Osínin. Valerián Vladímirovitch Ratmírov. I On the 10th of August 1862, at four o’clock in the afternoon, a great number of people were thronging before the well-known Konversation in Baden-Baden. The weather was lovely; everything around—the green trees, the bright houses of the gay city, and the undulating outline of the mountains—everything was in holiday mood, basking in the rays of the kindly sunshine; everything seemed smiling with a sort of blind, 1 Smoke Ivan Turgenev confiding delight; and the same glad, vague smile strayed over the human faces too, old and young, ugly and beautiful alike. Even the blackened and whitened visages of the Parisian demi-monde could not destroy the general impression of bright content and elation, while their many-coloured ribbons and feathers and the sparks of gold and steel on their hats and veils involuntarily recalled the intensified brilliance and light fluttering of birds in spring, with their rainbow-tinted wings. But the dry, guttural snapping of the French jargon, heard on all sides could not equal the song of birds, nor be compared with it. Everything, however, was going on in its accustomed way. The orchestra in the Pavilion played first a medley from the Traviata, then one of Strauss’s waltzes, then ‘Tell her,’ a Russian song, adapted for instruments by an obliging conductor.
    [Show full text]
  • Anton Chekhov Analysis
    Anton Chekhov Analysis By Ryan Funes If you were to have gone out on the street and asked anyone about Mark Twain, William Shakespear, or even F. Scott Fitzgerald, you may get a positive response from the person, in that they know of the person. But, if you were to have asked about Anton Chekhov, you would probably get a dumbfounded, confused response. I would not be surprised though by those results, since Chekhov did not really have anything iconic about him or any gimmick, but when I was introduced to his short stories, I was immediatley hooked in by his themes and writing style. I really did not know what to say about the guy, but after reading and looking into his life, he was definitely a skilled dramatist, satirist, and writer. For those who are not too familiar with his life, Anton Chekhov was born in 1860, Taganrog, Russia to the son of a serf and a merchants wife. He lived a fairly well childhood and also did well in school, as he did continue on to become a medical student, and at the same time, an author who started out as a columnist for a Moscow newspaper. While his first short stories were not well recieved at first, along with a bloody play of his being under heavy censorship at the time, he continued on with his writing career, even while under the pressure of supporting his family, whose health was deterring. But, as a result of his writings, Chekhov became well known for his wit and subtle satire in his early writings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Characterization of the Physician in Schnitzler's and Chekhov's Works
    THE PHYSICIAN IN SCHNITZLERIS AND CHEKHOV1S WORKS THE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PHYSICIAN IN SCHNITZLER 'S Al''-ID CHEKHOV I S WORKS By LOVORKA IVANKA FABEK, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master Gf Arts McMaster University September 1985 MASTER OF ARTS (1985) McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: THE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PHYSICIAN IN SCHNITZLER'S AND CHEKHOV'S WORKS AUTHOR: LOVORKA IVANKA FABEK, B.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Gerald Chapple NUMBER OF PAGES: viii, 146. ii ABSTRACT Arthur Schnitzler (1862-1931) and Anton Pavlovich Chekhov (1860-1904) were both writers as well as physicians. The latter profession had a significant influence on their works, which is evident in the frequent use of the doctor figure in their plays and prose works. What distinguishes Schnitzler and Chekhov from other writers of the fin-de,...si~c1e, is their ability to clinically observe psycho­ logical and social problems. Sclmitzler's and Chekhov's works contain "diagnosesJl made by their doctor figure. This study examines the respective qualities of a spectrum of six major types. There are mixed, mainly positive and mainly negative types of doctor figures, ranging from the revolutionary type down to the pathetic doctor figure and the calculating type. Dealing with differences as well as with similarities, the thesis concludes by showing how the characterization of the doctor figure sh.eds light on the authors that created them. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to my Supervisor, Dr. Gerald Chapple, for initially suggesting the topic of this thesis and for his guidance and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Literature LXXIV (2013) III/IV
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/authorsrights Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Russian Literature LXXIV (2013) III/IV www.elsevier.com/locate/ruslit THE BRAINLESS VIRTUOSO AS AN EXISTENTIAL THINKER: ČECHOV’S POETICS OF CONTRARIETY IN ‘DREAMS’ NIKITA NANKOV Abstract This study entwines two literary and two philosophical goals. The first literary aim is to dispel the enduring paradigm in Chekhov studies presenting this writer as a brainless virtuoso, who writes artistically brilliant works that lack idea(l)s. The second is to examine Chekhov’s poetics of contrariety, and illustrate it with an analysis of the short story ‘Dreams’ (‘Mechty’). Behind these two literary tasks loom two philosophical issues. First, the oxymoron of the brainless virtuoso is rooted in the fact that a great part of Chekhov criticism has been in the wake of Cartesian rationalism, which postulates that theoretical thinking precedes practical living. Since Chekhov writes in the phenomenological tradition grounded on the premise that practical living precedes theoretical thinking, interpreting him along rationalist lines is questionable.
    [Show full text]