Automation, Robotics & Communications for Industry 4.0
Proceedings of the 1st IFSA Winter Conference on Automation, Robotics & Communications for Industry 4.0 (ARCI’ 2021)
3-5 February 2021
Edited by Sergey Y. Yurish
Sergey Y. Yurish, Editor Automation, Robotics & Communications for Industry 4.0 ARCI’ 2021 Conference Proceedings
Copyright © 2021 by International Frequency Sensor Association (IFSA) Publishing, S. L. E-mail (for orders and customer service enquires): [email protected] Visit our Home Page on http://www.sensorsportal.com All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (IFSA Publishing, S. L., Barcelona, Spain). Neither the authors nor International Frequency Sensor Association Publishing accept any responsibility or liability for loss or damage occasioned to any person or property through using the material, instructions, methods or ideas contained herein, or acting or refraining from acting as a result of such use. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identifies as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.
ISBN: 978-84-09-27538-0 BN-20210129-XX BIC: TJFM 1st IFSA Winter Conference on Automation, Robotics & Communications for Industry 4.0 (ARCI’ 2021), 3-5 February 2021, Chamonix-Mont-Blanc, France Contents
Foreword ...... 5
Turbo Coded Single User Massive MIMO with Precoding ...... 6 K. Vasudevan, Gyanesh Kumar Pathak, A. Phani Kumar Reddy Wearable Sensor Technology for Individual Grip Force Profiling ...... 12 Rongrong Liu, Florent Nageotte, Philippe Zanne, Michel de Mathelin and Birgitta Dresp-Langley Robot-robot Cooperation for Efficient Drilling of Soft Materials ...... 14 J. Gotlih, T. Karner, M. Ficko and M. Brezočnik Recurrent Neural Network Structures for Learning Control Valve Behaviour ...... 20 Camilla Sterud, Signe Moe, Mads Valentin Bram, Stephen Roberts, Jan-Peter Calliess Velocity Planning of a Robotic Task Enhanced by Fuzzy Logic and Dynamic Movement Primitives ...... 26 B. Maggioni, E. Marescotti, A. M. Zanchettin, D. Piga, L. Roveda Sufficient Conditions for the Existence of Periodic Solutions to a Modified Elman Neural Network ...... 30 Z. Kovacheva, and V. Covachev Predictive Control with Energy Efficiency Enabled by Real-time Machine Learning ...... 34 G. Y. Luo,, Y. Q. Luo and H. G. Gan On Brain and Cognitive Intelligence Based Control in Robotics ...... 39 B. Wei Learning from Demonstration for Collaborative Robots ...... 45 A. Rizzotti-Kaddouri, M. Kunze, L. Jeanneret, L. Depierraz and N. Ouerhani Model-driven Engineering of Gateways for Industrial Automation ...... 47 P. Denzler, D. Ramsauer and W. Kastner Condition Monitoring of Drive Trains by Data Fusion of Acoustic Emission and Vibration Sensors ...... 52 Oliver Mey, André Schneider, Olaf Enge-Rosenblatt, Dirk Mayer, Christian Schmidt, Samuel Klein, Hans-Georg Herrmann Experimental Validation of Petri Nets Based Regulation Control in a Small-scale Manufacturing System ...... 57 J. M. Chavez, A. C. Gaona, C. R. Vázquez and A. Ramírez-Treviño Measurements of Geometric Characteristics on Machine Tool as an Element of Closed Door Technology ...... 64 P. Gierlak, A. Burghardt, K. Kurc, M. Muszyńska, D. Szybicki and G. Bomba Asymptotic Random Distortion Testing for Anomaly Detection ...... 68 Dominique Pastor, Guillaume Ansel Comparison Study of Two Recent Metaheuristic with Application to High Efficiency Induction Motor Design ...... 71 H. Ladaycia The Pulse Project: A Framework for Supervising Data Exchanges in an IoT System ...... 74 Jannik Laval EEG Based BCI System for Driver’s Arm Movements Identification ...... 77 E. Zero, C. Bersani and R. Sacile Robotic Manufacturing Systems Using Internet of Things: New Era of Facing Pandemics ...... 82 Hamed Fazlollahtabar A Modified Reinitialization Mechanism for Particle Swarm Optimization Based Control, Case Study: PV System ...... 86 T. Shaqarin
3 1st IFSA Winter Conference on Automation, Robotics & Communications for Industry 4.0 (ARCI’ 2021), 3-5 February 2021, Chamonix-Mont-Blanc, France Important Data Quality Accents for Data Analytics and Decision Making ...... 90 Ina Naydenova, Zlatinka Kovаcheva, and Kalinka Kaloyanova, Internet Video Traffic Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks ...... 96 E. Grabs, E. Petersons, D. Efrosinin, A. Ipatovs and V. Sturm Human-Robot Interaction: Applications ...... 98 Abdel-Nasser Sharkawy From Hand to Brain and Back: Grip Forces Deliver Insight into the Functional Plasticity of Somatosensory Processes ...... 104 Birgitta Dresp-Langley Formation Control of Five Vehicles for Load Transportation Under Randomly-switching Communication Topology ...... 107 A. Tahri, L. Guenfaf Intelligent Measurements as a Bridge between Measurement Theory and Artificial Intelligence: Bayesian Measurement Neural Networks (BMN) Based on the Methodology of the Regularizing Bayesian Approach ...... 110 S. Prokopchina Providing Measurement Trustworthiness is the Key to Industry 4.0 Realisation ...... 114 K. Sapozhnikova, A. Pronin and R. Taymanov Automation of Distributed Computing in a P2P Network ...... 119 Y. Shichkina, M. Kupriyanov, K. Krinkin and S. Moldachev Pulse Averaging Primary Converters for Monitoring Systems ...... 122 O. Bureneva, P. Bondarenko and N. Safyannikov A New Diagnostic Marker for Endometriosis – Kisspeptin Evaluated in Endometrium with Algorithms of Computer Vision and Machine Learning ...... 124 A. O. Drobintseva, A. S. Krasichkov, M. S. Kupriyanov, V. O. Polyakova Age Changes in the Expression Level of Dense Contact Markers in Women after Myomectomy ...... 126 V. O. Polyakova,, T. S. Kleimenova, A. I. Shapovalova, D. S. Medvedev, A. S. Krasichkov, M. S. Kupriyanov Modern Methods for Determining Emotional Stress Based on Physiological Signals and Machine Learning ...... 130 E. Pustozerov, and R. Uvarov Intelligent Measurement Technologies for Water Supplying Systems Management ...... 132 S. Prokopchina
4 1st IFSA Winter Conference on Automation, Robotics & Communications for Industry 4.0 (ARCI’ 2021), 3-5 February 2021, Chamonix-Mont-Blanc, France
Foreword
On behalf of the ARCI’ 2021 Organizing Committee, I introduce with pleasure these proceedings with contributions from the 1st IFSA Winter Conference on Automation, Robotics & Communications for Industry 4.0 (ARCI’ 2021), 3-5 February 2021.
According to the modern market study, the global Industry 4.0 market will reach US$ 155.30 Billion by 2024 growing at the CAGR of slightly above 14.9 % between 2018 and 2024. Increasing adoption of the industrial internet and IIoT worldwide in manufacturing units, growing focus on enhanced efficiency of machinery and systems, and reduced production costs play a significant role in the growth of the market worldwide.
Industry 4.0 represents the 4th industrial revolution that marks the rising of new digital industry. It is defined as an integrated system that comprises numerous technologies such as advanced robotics control, automation tools, sensors, artificial intelligence, cloud computing, digital fabrication, etc. These technologies help in developing machines that will be self-optimized and self-configured. It helps in enhancing asset performance, technology usage, material usage and other industrial processes that are involves in various industries. Numerous benefits are offered by these technologies such as low operational cost, improved productivity, enhanced customer satisfaction, improved customization, and increased efficiency. The Industry 4.0 holds a lot of potentials and is expected to register a substantial growth in the near future. There are several conferences on automation, robotics and communications, but they are not meet the Industry 4.0 challenges.
The series of annual ARCI Winter IFSA conferences have been launched to fill-in this gap and provide a forum for open discussion of state-of-the-art technologies related to control, automation, robotics and communication - three main components of Industry 4.0. It will be also to discuss how to adopt the current R&D results for Industry 4.0 and to customize products under the conditions of highly flexible (mass-) production.
The conference is organized by the International Frequency Sensor Association (IFSA) - one of the major professional, non-profit association serving for sensor industry and academy more than 20 years, in technical cooperation with media partners – journals: MDPI Sensors (Switzerland), Soft Measurements and Computing (Russia) and magazine Manufacturing Technologies Insights (USA). The conference program provides an opportunity for researchers interested in signal processing and artificial intelligence to discuss their latest results and exchange ideas on the new trends.
I hope that these proceedings will give readers an excellent overview of important and diversity topics discussed at the conference.
We thank all authors for submitting their latest works, thus contributing to the excellent technical contents of the Conference. Especially, we would like to thank the individuals and organizations that worked together diligently to make this Conference a success, and to the members of the International Program Committee for the thorough and careful review of the papers. It is important to point out that the great majority of the efforts in organizing the technical program of the Conference came from volunteers.
Prof., Dr. Sergey Y. Yurish ARCI’ 2021 Conference Chairman
5 1st IFSA Winter Conference on Automation, Robotics & Communications for Industry 4.0 (ARCI’ 2021), 3-5 February 2021, Chamonix-Mont-Blanc, France (001)
Turbo Coded Single User Massive MIMO with Precoding
K. Vasudevan, Gyanesh Kumar Pathak, A. Phani Kumar Reddy Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur-208016, India {vasu, pathak, phani}@iitk.ac.in
Summary: Precoding is a method of compensating the channel at the transmitter. This work presents a novel method of data detection in turbo coded single user massive multiple input multiple output (MIMO) systems using precoding. We show via computer simulations that, when precoding is used, re-transmitting the data does not result in significant reduction in bit-error- rate (BER), thus increasing the spectral efficiency, compared to the case without precoding. Moreover, increasing the number of transmit and receive antennas results in improved BER.
Keywords: Precoding, Massive MIMO, Turbo codes, Flat fading, Spectral efficiency.
1. Introduction precoding [22, 23]. Rayleigh flat fading channel is assumed. If the channel is frequency selective, Precoding at the transmitter is a technique that orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) dates back to the era of voice band modems or wired can be used [14, 23-32]. communications [1-7]. The term “precoding” is quite This work is organized as follows. Section 2 generic and refers to one or more of the many different describes the signal model. In Section 3 precoding for functionalities, as given below: single user massive MIMO is discussed. Section 4 1. It compensates for the distortion introduced by the presents the simulation results and conclude the work channel. Note that channel compensation at the in Section 5. receiver is referred to as equalization [8-14]. Here, channel compensation implies removal or 2. Signal Model minimization of intersymbol interference (ISI). 2. It performs error control coding, besides channel Consider a precoded MIMO system with 𝑁 compensation. transmit and 𝑁 receive antennas, as shown in Fig. 1 3. It shapes the spectrum of the transmitted signal, and [22]. The precoded received signal in the 𝑘 renders it suitable for propagation over the physical (0 𝑘 𝑁 1, 𝑘 is an integer), re-transmission is channel. Note that most channels do not propagate given by a DC signal and precoding is used to remove the DC component in the message signal. At this point, 𝐑 𝐇 𝐇 𝐒 𝐖 , (1) it is important to distinguish between a message signal and the transmitted signal. where 𝐑 ∈ℂ is the received vector, In the context of wireless multiple input, multiple 𝐇 ∈ℂ is the channel matrix and 𝐖 ∈ℂ is output (MIMO) systems, the main task of the precoder the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) vector. is to remove interchannel interference (ICI), either for The transmitted symbol vector is 𝐒 ∈ℂ , whose single-user or multi-user case [15-21]. It should be elements are drawn from an 𝑀 -ary constellation. observed that precoding requires knowledge of the Boldface letters denote vectors or matrices. Complex channel state information (CSI) at the transmitter, quantities are denoted by a tilde. However tilde is not which is usually fed back by the receiver to the used for complex symbols 𝐒 . The elements of 𝐇 are transmitter. The receiver estimates CSI from a known statistically independent, zero mean, circularly training signal that is sent by the transmitter. CSI symmetric complex Gaussian with variance per usually refers to the channel impulse response (CIR) or dimension equal to 𝜎 , as given by (2) of [22]. its statistics (mean and covariance), depending on the type of precoder used. Thus, precoding requires the Similarly, the elements of 𝐖 are statistically independent, zero mean, circularly symmetric complex channel to be time invariant or wide sense stationary (WSS) over at least one transmit and receive duration. Gaussian with variance per dimension equal to 𝜎 , as Moreover, precoding can only be performed on given by (3) of [22]. systems employing time division duplex (TDD), which In this work, the elements of 𝐒 are turbo coded is a method of half duplex telecommunication. In other and mapped to a QPSK constellation with coordinates words, the channel needs to be reciprocal, that is, the 1 j, as depicted in Fig. 1. Moreover, here 𝐇 is an CIR from the transmitter to receiver must be identical 𝑁 𝑁 matrix, whereas in [22] 𝐇 is an 𝑁 𝑁 to that from receiver to transmitter. matrix. We assume that 𝐇 and 𝐖 are independent In this work, we describe an elegant precoding across re-transmissions, hence (4) in [22] is valid with method which reduces ICI in single user massive 𝑁 replaced by 𝑁 . We now proceed to analyze the MIMO systems and compare it with the case without signal model in (1).
6 1st IFSA Winter Conference on Automation, Robotics & Communications for Industry 4.0 (ARCI’ 2021), 3-5 February 2021, Chamonix-Mont-Blanc, France
Fig. 1. System Model.
3. Precoding 𝐸 𝐼 , 𝐸 ∑ 𝐹 , , 𝑆 The 𝑖 element of 𝐑 in (1) is ∗ ∗ ∑ 𝐹 , , 𝑆 𝑅 𝐹 𝑆 𝐼 𝑊 (7) , , , , , (2) ∗ for 1 𝑖 𝑁 , ∑∑ 𝑃 𝐸 𝐹 , , 𝐹 , , 𝛿 𝑗 𝑙 where 𝑃 ∑ 𝐸 𝐹 , , , 𝐹 , , ∑ 𝐻 , , ,𝐼 , ∑ 𝐹 , , 𝑆 , (3) where 𝛿 ⋅ is the Kronecker delta function [14, 22], ∗ we have assumed independence between 𝐹 and 𝑆 𝐹 , , ∑ 𝐻 , , 𝐻 , , for 𝑖 𝑗 , , and [22] The desired signal in (2) is 𝐹 𝑆 , the interference , , ∗ 𝐸 𝑆 𝑆 𝑃 𝛿 𝑗 𝑙 2𝛿 𝑗 𝑙 (8) term is 𝐼 , and the noise term is 𝑊 , . Now