Account Opening Offers Canada
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
United States Bankruptcy Court District of Delaware
Case 20-11779-LSS Doc 55 Filed 07/09/20 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------------ x In re : Chapter 11 : VIVUS, INC., et al., : Case No. 20–11779 (LSS) : : Debtors.1 : (Joint Administration Requested) ------------------------------------------------------------ x NOTICE OF FILING OF PROPOSED REDACTED VERSION OF THE CREDITOR MATRIX PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 9018-1(d)(ii) of the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, VIVUS, Inc. and its debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases, hereby file the attached proposed redacted version of the Creditor Matrix2 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, 824 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable are: Vivus B.V. (1942); Vivus Digital Health Corporation (0625); VIVUS, Inc. (6179); and Vivus Pharmaceuticals Limited (9329). The Debtors’ corporate headquarters and service address is 900 E. Hamilton Avenue, Suite 550, Campbell, CA 95008. 2 Contemporaneously herewith, the Debtors have filed the Motion of Debtors for Entry of Order (I) Authorizing Debtors to Redact Certain Personal Identification Information in Creditor Matrix and Certain Other Documents and (II) Granting Related Relief. RLF1 23325296v.1 Case 20-11779-LSS Doc 55 Filed 07/09/20 Page 2 of 19 Dated: July 9, 2020 Wilmington, Delaware /s/ Sarah E. Silveira RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A. Mark D. -
The Canadian Banking System, 1890-1966
JACK CARR FRANK MATHEWSON NEIL QUIGLEY Stabilityin the Absenceof DepositInsurance: The CanadianBanking System, 1890 1966 THESTABILITY OF THE CANADIAN BANKING SYSTEM in the period before the introductionof formaldeposit insurancein 1967, and in particular, the Canadianbanks' immunityfrom the crisis that afflictedthe U.S. bankingsystem in the GreatDepression, are well known. Between 1890 and 1966, only twelve Ca- nadian charteredbanks failed; six of these failures resulted in losses to the deposi- tors. No bank failures occurredafter the suspensionof the Home Bank of Canadain 1923. Explanationsfor the relative stability of Canadianbanking have focused on the structureof the system, particularlythe economies of scale and portfolio diver- sification achieved by the large branch banks in Canada (Friedmanand Schwartz 1963; Haubrich1990) and the creationof a governmentrediscount facility in 1914. Some (Bordo 1986; Shearer, Chant, and Bond 1984; White 1983) suggestthat the Canadianfederal authoritiesand the CanadianBankers Association (CBA) implic- itly guaranteedbank deposits by arrangingmergers. Most recently, Kryzanowski and Roberts (1993, p. 362) claim that all of the major Canadianbanks were insol- vent during the 1930s, and explain the absence of a banking crisis by the fact that the Canadiangovernment provided "an implicit one hundredpercent guaranteeof bank deposits." The authorsthank the staff of The Bank of Nova Scotia Archives, The CanadianBankers Association Library,and the NationalArchives of Canadafor their assistance in compiling our data. Michael Bordo, John Chant, Ian Drummond,Ron Shearer,anonymous referees, and participantsat the l9th Conference on the Use of QuantitativeMethods in CanadianEconomic Historyprovided helpful comments. Funding for this research was provided by the Institutefor Policy Analysis at the University of Torontoand the University of Westem Ontarioas partof a largerproject on deposit insurancein Canada(CalT, Mathew- son, and Quigley 1994a). -
Credit Union Guidebook
Retail Impact Investing A GUIDEBOOK FOR CANADIAN CREDIT UNIONS FOREWORD Impact investing has the potential to be a growth opportunity and differentiator for the Canadian credit union sector. Today, impact investment options exist primarily for institutional and accredited investors. The opportunities for everyday investors to generate a return, while generating positive impact, are limited – this, despite evidence of market interest led by millennials and others. Credit unions are well positioned to tap into this opportunity. A core part of their mission is to ensure the financial, social and environmental well-being of the communities they serve: a mission that is aligned with the principles of impact investing. We see this Guidebook as a tangible resource to help credit unions address a marketplace gap and empower members to make investments that will have demonstrable, positive impacts in their communities. The Guidebook offers credit unions of all sizes and at all stages of their social responsibility journey actionable ideas of how to create and deploy retail impact investment products for their members. The guide also points to recommendations that the credit union sector as a whole can undertake. The Canadian Credit Union Association (CCUA) is committed to working with credit unions to explore how these recommendations can be advanced. We welcome your ideas and feedback - contact us at www.impactinvesting.ca/contact. CCUA is proud to have partnered with Purpose Capital, Employment and Social Development Canada, as well as a number of interested credit unions, to develop and share the research in this Guidebook. We want to extend our gratitude to Affinity Credit Union, Alterna Savings and Credit Union, Assiniboine Credit Union, Conexus Credit Union, DUCA Financial Services Credit Union, Libro Credit Union, Mennonite Savings & Credit Union, Meridian Credit Union, Servus Credit Union and Vancity Credit Union for their support and contribution to the development of this Guidebook. -
DENIS FRAYCE and MAXWELL WALLACE Plaintiffs
Court File No./N° du dossier du greffe: CV-20-00638868-00CP Court File No.: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Electronically issued : 27-Mar-2020 Délivré par voie électroniqueB E T W E E N : Toronto DENIS FRAYCE and MAXWELL WALLACE Plaintiffs - and - BMO INVESTORLINE INC., CIBC INVESTOR SERVICES INC., CREDENTIAL QTRADE SECURITIES INC., DESJARDINS SECURITIES INC., HSBC SECURITIES (CANADA) INC., NATIONAL BANK FINANCIAL INC., QUESTRADE INC., RBC DIRECT INVESTING INC., SCOTIA CAPITAL INC., TD WATERHOUSE CANADA INC., LAURENTIAN BANK SECURITIES INC., and BBS SECURITIES INC. Defendants STATEMENT OF CLAIM Proceeding Under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 TO THE DEFENDANTS: A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED AGAINST YOU by the plaintiff. The claim made against you is set out in the following pages. IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, you or an Ontario lawyer acting for you must prepare a statement of defence in Form 18A prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it on the plaintiff’s lawyer or, where the plaintiff does not have a lawyer, serve it on the plaintiff, and file it, with proof of service, in this court office, WITHIN TWENTY DAYS after this statement of claim is served on you, if you are served in Ontario. If you are served in another province or territory of Canada or in the United States of America, the period for serving and filing your statement of defence is forty days. If you are served outside Canada and the United States of America, the period is sixty days. Instead of serving and filing a statement of defence, you may serve and file a notice of intent to defend in Form 18B prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure. -
WHY DID the BANK of in Financial Markets and Monetary Economics
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHY DIDTHEBANK OF CANADA EMERGE IN 1935? Michael Bordo Angela Redish Working Paper No. 2079 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 November 1986 The research reported here is part of the NBER's research program in Financial Markets and Monetary Economics. Any opinions expressed are those of the authors and not those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper #2079 November 1986 Why Did the Bank of Canada Emerge in 1935? ABSTRACT Three possible explanations for the emergence of the Canadian central bank in 1935 are examined: that it reflected the need of competitive banking systems for a lender of the last resort; that it was necessary to anchor the unregulated Canadian monetary system after the abandonment of the gold standard in 1929; and that it was a response to political rather than purely economic pressures. Evidence from a variety of sources (contemporary statements to a Royal Comission, the correspondence of chartered bankers, newspaper reports, academic writings and the estimation of time series econometric models) rejects the first two hypotheses and supports the third. Michael D. Bordo Angela Redish Department of Economics Department of Economics College of Business Administration University of British Columbia University of South CArolina Vancouver, B.C. V6T lY2 Columbia, SC 29208 Canada Why Did the Bank of Canada Emeroe in 1935? Michael D. Bordo and Angela Redish Three possible explanations for the emergence of the Canadian central bank in 1935 are examined: that it reflected the need of competitive banking systems for a lender of last resort; that it was necessary to anchor the unregulated Canadian monetary system after the abandonment of the gold standard in 1929; and that it was a response to political rather than purely economic pressures. -
Alterna Savings and Credit Union Ltd. 842 Brunswick Cr
SECTION I NUMERIC LIST MEMBERS / LISTE NUMÉRIQUE DES MEMBRES 1 ALTERNA SAVINGS AND CREDIT UNION LTD. 842 Routing Numbers / Numéros d'acheminement Electronic Paper(MICR) Électronique Papier(MICR) Postal Address - Addresse postale 084200646 00646-842 ALTERNA SAVINGS AND CREDIT UNION LTD, Westboro Branch, 319 McRae Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1Z 0B9 BRUNSWICK CR. UNION FEDERATION LTD. 849 Routing Numbers / Numéros d'acheminement Electronic Paper(MICR) Électronique Papier(MICR) Postal Address - Addresse postale 084907964 07964-849 BCUF-STABILIZATION BOARD, 421 CHARLES LUTES ROAD, Lutes Mountain, NB E1G 2T5 084917054 17054-849 ADVANCE SAVINGS CREDIT UNION, 141 Weldon St., P.O. Box 92, Moncton, NB E1C 8R9 084917104 17104-849 New Brunswick Teachers' Association, 2-153 Harvey Road, McAdam, NB E6J 1A1 084917294 17294-849 BAYVIEW CREDIT UNION (WEST) LTD, West Branch, 46 Main Street, 46 Main Street West, Saint John, NB E2M 3N1 084917344 17344-849 PROGRESSIVE CREDIT UNION, 106 Richmond Street, Unit 1, P.O. Box 55, Woodstock, NB E7M 2N9 084927004 27004-849 ATLANTIC CENTRAL, 663 Pinewood Road, P.O. Box 1025, Riverview, NB E1B 5R6 084927384 27384-849 ADVANCE SAVINGS CREDIT UNION (PPT), 960 St. George Blvd., Moncton, NB E1E 3Y3 084937094 37094-849 BEAUBEAR CREDIT UNION, 376 Water Street, P.O. Box 764, Miramichi, NB E1V 3V4 084937664 37664-849 BAYVIEW CREDIT UNION, Administration & Executive, 57 King Street, Saint John, NB E2L 1G5 084947184 47184-849 BEAUBEAR CREDIT UNION, 202 Pleasant Street, P.O. Box 764, Miramichi, NB E1V 3V4 084957084 57084-849 THE CREDIT UNION LTD, 422 William Street, Dalhousie, NB E8C 2X2 084957134 57134-849 BLACKVILLE CREDIT UNION, 128 Main Street, Blackville, NB E9B 1P1 084957324 57324-849 ADVANCE SAVINGS CREDIT UNION, Advance Savings Credit Union, 47 Main Street, Petitcodiac, NB E4Z 4L9 084967034 67034-849 BAYVIEW CREDIT UNION LTD, Westmorland Roadbranch, 550 Main Street, Hampton, NB E5N 6C3 084967174 07013-839 OMISTA CREDIT UNION, 494 Queen Street, P.O. -
Past Best Employers
2017 List of the Aon Best Employers in Canada Organization Organization Aecon Group Inc.* Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP* Allstate Insurance Company of Canada* Intact Financial Corporation ATB Financial* Keg Restaurants Ltd.* Banque Nationale (BN)* Libro Credit Union BBA Inc.* Loyalty One, Co.* Bennett Jones LLP* Maritime Travel* Birchwood Automotive Group* Marriott Hotels of Canada* Brookfield Residential Properties Inc. MNP LLP* Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAPREIT) Mouvement Desjardins* CIMA+ Partenaire de génie* OpenRoad Auto Group Ltd.* Cintas Canada Limited* PCL Constructors Inc.* Clark Builders* Polygon Security Inc. (Viking, Fireflex, SCS) Colliers International Purdys Chocolatier* Cossette Communications Inc. SAP Canada Inc.* Davis Automotive Group Ltd.* Skyline Group of Companies Dilawri CROWN Auto Group Stikeman Elliott LLP* Edward Jones* TD Bank Group* EllisDon Corporation* The Co-operators* Equitable Bank Farm Credit Canada* Federal Express Canada Ltd.* *Companies who have been on the list for five years or more 2016 List of the Aon Best Employers in Canada Organization Organization Aecon Group Inc.* Intact Financial Corporation Allstate Insurance Company of Canada Keg Restaurants Ltd.* ATB Financial* Keyera Corp. Banque Nationale (BN)* La Coop fédérée BCAA* Libro Credit Union Bennett Jones LLP* LoyaltyOne, Co* Birchwood Automotive Group* Lush Fresh Handmade Cosmetics* Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust Maritime Travel* Chubb Insurance Company of Canada* Marriott International* -
2019 DELEGATE LIST First Name Last Name Organization Niramay
2019 DELEGATE LIST First Name Last Name Organization Niramay . 1985 Chuck Lee AIMCO Stephan Dumais Air Canada Pension Investments Sean McCready Anson Advisors Inc. Hector Fernandez Crespo Banco Santander Enrique Verdu Aguilar Banco Santander, S.A Daryl Blattberg Bank of America Isabel Docal Bank of America Jerry Hubert Bank of America Merrill Lynch Zahir Antia Bank of Canada Harri Vikstedt Bank of Canada Spencer Bailey Bank of Montreal Stéphanie Jules Bank of Montreal Deborah Wise Bank of Montreal Abhinav Chandra Barclays Heather Gidaly Barclays Charles Tacopino Barclays David Jeffrey BBS SECURITIES INC. Nick Hay BlackRock Marc Kitay BMO John Mitrano BMO JINSONG WANG BMO Daniel Antchipalovski BMO Capital Markets Nick Chan BMO Capital Markets Tamy Chen BMO Capital Markets Annaleigh Greene BMO Capital Markets Kimberley Jansen BMO Capital Markets john Loynd BMO Capital Markets Jordan Lupu BMO Capital Markets Pamela Murphy BMO Capital Markets Alina Popa BMO Capital Markets MJ Schuessler BMO Capital Markets Stephanie Stoyan BMO Capital Markets Anthony Venditti BMO Capital Markets 1 of 7 5/22/2019 Melissa Kelman BMO Financial Group Chris Beswick BMO Private Investment Counsel Inc. Kathleen Cooney BNP Paribas Don De Vito BNP Paribas Robert Lakeman BNP Paribas MIKE SAUNDERS BNP PARIBAS Vincent Tieu BNP Paribas Ilkhom Babajanov BNY Mellon Eric Badger BNY Mellon Wesley Cook BNY Mellon Keith Donohue BNY Mellon Cezan Duong BNY Mellon William Kelly BNY Mellon Richard Marquis BNY Mellon Patric Ochoa BNY Mellon Taras Sidorenko BNY Mellon John Templeton BNY Mellon Ted Thresher BNY Mellon Simon Tomlinson BNY Mellon Daniel Yardin BNY Mellon Phil Zywot BNY Mellon Michael Madaio BNY Mellon | Pershing Michael Silecchia BNY Mellon | Pershing Carol Penhale Broadridge Financial Solutions Valarie Thorgerson Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc Mike Airey Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. -
Competing in a Global Innovation Economy: the Current State of R&D
COMPETING IN A GLOBAL INNOVATION ECONOMY: THE CURRENT STATE OF R&D IN CANADA Expert Panel on the State of Science and Technology and Industrial Research and Development in Canada Science Advice in the Public Interest COMPETING IN A GLOBAL INNOVATION ECONOMY: THE CURRENT STATE OF R&D IN CANADA Expert Panel on the State of Science and Technology and Industrial Research and Development in Canada ii Competing in a Global Innovation Economy: The Current State of R&D in Canada THE COUNCIL OF CANADIAN ACADEMIES 180 Elgin Street, Suite 1401, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2P 2K3 Notice: The project that is the subject of this report was undertaken with the approval of the Board of Directors of the Council of Canadian Academies (CCA). Board members are drawn from the Royal Society of Canada (RSC), the Canadian Academy of Engineering (CAE), and the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS), as well as from the general public. The members of the expert panel responsible for the report were selected by the CCA for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance. This report was prepared for the Government of Canada in response to a request from the Minister of Science. Any opinions, findings, or conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors, the Expert Panel on the State of Science and Technology and Industrial Research and Development in Canada, and do not necessarily represent the views of their organizations of affiliation or employment, or the sponsoring organization, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Council of Canadian Academies. -
Canada's Antidumping and Safeguard Policies: Overt and Subtle Forms Of
Revised version forthcoming in The World Economy Canada’s Antidumping and Safeguard Policies: Overt and Subtle Forms of Discrimination Chad P. Bown† Brandeis University & The Brookings Institution This Draft: February 2007 (Original draft: April 2005) Abstract Like many countries in the international trading system, Canada repeatedly faces political pressure from industries seeking protection from import competition. I examine Canadian policymakers’ response to this pressure within the economic environment created by its participation in discriminatory trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). In particular, I exploit new sources of data on Canada’s use of potentially WTO-consistent import-restricting policies such as antidumping, global safeguards, and a China-specific safeguard. I illustrate subtle ways in which Canadian policymakers may be structuring the application of such policies so as to reinforce the discrimination inherent in Canada’s external trade policy because of the preferences granted to the United States and Mexico through NAFTA. JEL No. F13 Keywords: Canada, trade policy, antidumping, safeguards, MFN, WTO † Correspondence: Department of Economics and International Business School, MS 021, Brandeis University, PO Box 549110, Waltham, MA, 02454-9110 USA. tel: 781-736-4823, fax: 781-736-2269, email: [email protected], web: http://www.brandeis.edu/~cbown/. I gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Centre for International Governance Innovation. I thank Rachel McCulloch for comments -
Canadian Retail Banking Customer Satisfaction Improves
J.D. Power Reports: Canadian Retail Banking Customer Satisfaction Improves as Customers Increasingly Understand Fees and Services; However, Customers Still Perceive Banks as Profit Driven, Lagging in Innovation and Not Customer Focused TD Canada Trust and ING Direct Canada Each Rank Highest in Customer Satisfaction with Retail Banks in Canada in Their Respective Segments for a Second Consecutive Year TORONTO: 18 July 2013 —Overall customer satisfaction with the Big 51 and Midsize banks in Canada has increased, driven primarily by customers’ increasing understanding regarding fees and services. However, customers perceive banks as being profit driven, lagging in innovation and not customer focused, according to the J.D. Power 2013 Canadian Retail Banking Customer Satisfaction StudySM released today. The study, now in its eighth year, examines customer satisfaction with their primary financial institution in three segments: Big 5 Banks, Midsize Banks and Credit Unions. In all segments, customer satisfaction is measured in seven factors (listed in order of importance): channel activities; account information; facilities; product offerings; fees; financial advisor; and problem resolution. Overall customer satisfaction among retail bank KEY FINDINGS customers in Canada increases substantially by 19 points to 772 (on a 1,000-point scale), compared with 753 in Overall customer satisfaction with 2012, as customers increasingly understand their banks’ Canadian retail banks increases by 19 fees and services. Satisfaction in the Big 5 Banks segment points to 772 in 2013. increases to 765 from 748 in 2012. Customer satisfaction Customer satisfaction with banking in the Midsize Banks segment increases to 778 from 759 fees has increased substantially by 35 in 2012. -
Wealth Management in a Mobile-First Era
Wealth Management In A Mobile-First Era How To Turn Robo Savers Into Robo Investors 14 December 2016 By: Mark Schwanhausser A growing number of so-called robo investment firms, fintech innovators, and bank partnerships is rushing to refine a cost-effective business model for investment services in a digital-first era. The challenges are numerous, starting with how to tempt today’s affluent Gen X, Baby Boomer, and female investors to try untested upstarts while also grooming tomorrow’s Gen Y banking customers who aren’t yet rich. The outcome will be shaped by how well financial institutions incorporate robo capabilities in three categories: digital banking insights, robo advising and investing, and personalized “robo writing.” Together, these services and players can build on Javelin’s Financial Journey Model, usher in new ways to coach customers, simplify investment decisions, counter anxiety in volatile times — and put banks and credit unions in a strong position when customers are ready to invest. Key questions discussed in this report: How can financial institutions use robo services to provide cost-effective investment services and groom customers to become eventual wealth management clients? What is the forecast for the potential market for Gen Y, Gen X, and Baby Boomer investors? Can banks and credit unions compete to provide robo services profitably? How should an FI prioritize investments to deliver insights in digital banking, robo advising and investing, and personalized information? Companies Mentioned: Acorns, Amazon (Echo), AssetBuilder,