DOCSLIB.ORG

GENOWIN DISOMIN/GUNOWEN Disoimin KEEPING OURSELVES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GENOWIN DISOMIN/GUNOWEN Disoimin KEEPING OURSELVES 1 i 1 1 1 1 GENOWIN DISOMIN/GUNOWEN DISOMIN 1 KEEPING OURSELVES A Comparison of Justice in Four First Nations 1 | 1 | The Submission of the Independent First Nations Alliance to the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 Garnet Angeconeb Executive Co-ordinator • Independent First Nations Alliance 1 601/2 Front Street Sioux Lookout Ontario 1 September 1993 P8T 1K6 1 GENOWIN DISOMIN/GUNOWEN DISOiMIN KEEPING OURSELVES "Thank you for letting me talk about the past. I know something about the past. We are trying to get back something that was lost. We lost it because someone told us that there was a better way. We are trying to keep ourselves, to govern ourselves We are trying to get back what we have lost and what we know is right" Albert Peters Elder Pikangikum First Nation, August 5,1993 The title of this paper is the term used by some elders for self-government. The title is in Ojibway (genowin disomin), Oji-Cree (gunowen disomin), and English (keeping ourselves). GENOWIN DISOMIN/GUNOWEN DISOMIN KEEPING OURSELVES A Comparison of Justice in Four First Nations The Submission of the Independent First Nations Alliance to the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples Summary i Map: The Communities of the Independent First Nations Alliance iv I Introduction 1 i The Independent First Nations Alliance 4 ii The Four First Nations 5 II Pikangikum in 1932: A Glimpse of the Past 10 in Traditional Methods of Social Control amongst the First Nations of the Independent First Nations Alliance 16 i A Complex Social Control System 18 ii Justice in the Elders' Youth 28 IV Social Control Today amongst the First Nations of the Independent First Nations Alliance 32 V Destructive Forces 42 VI Conclusion 58 NOTES 63 Appendix 1: Charged Persons Statistics, 1988-1990: Big Trout Lake First Nation, Muskrat Dam First Nation, Pikangikum First Nation. Appendix 2: R. v. Hatchard, [1993] 1 C.N.L.R. 96 (Ontario Court, General Division). Appendix 3: Project Description and Research Team. Appendix 4: Justice Concerns of the Independent First Nations Alliance, Presented to the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, Big Trout Lake, December 3, 1992. GENOWIN DISOMIN/GUNOWEN DISOMIN KEEPING OURSELVES A Comparison of Justice in Four First Nations The Submission of the Independent First Nations Alliance to the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples Summary The Independent First Nations Alliance works with the Big Trout Lake First Nation, the Lac Seul First Nation, the Muskrat Dam First Nation, and the Pikangikum First Nation, situated in Northwestern Ontario, four very different First Nations. The language of two of the communities is Ojibway while the other two speak Oji-Cree. Lac Seul is a signatory of Treaty 3, signing in 1873. Pikangikum signed Treaty 5 in 1875. Big Trout Lake and Muskrat Dam signed an adhesion to Treaty 9 in 1929. This paper focusses on only one aspect of First Nations life: on the destruction of indigenous social control systems and their replacement by the Euro-Canadian justice system. The four First Nations which work together in the Independent First Nations Alliance offer an illustration of the state of First Nations justice today, and of the ongoing process of colonization in relation to justice. The Alliance is funded through the DIAND tribal council funding formula but the four participating First Nations do not consider themselves a tribal council. The Four First Nations remain autonomous and independent of each other as they have been since time immemorial, working together through the Alliance where doing so does not compromise the individual independence of each of the member First Nations. In this research, the Alliance examined the state of community social control practices in each of the communities. The project was discussed with the Chiefs and Councils of each of the First Nations. The research team also attended a gathering of the four First Nations in Lac Seul. Fifteen elders and a number of other persons were interviewed. All but one of the Independent First Nations Alliance i Big Trout Lake, Lac Seul, Muskrat Dam, Pikangikum interviews were recorded in the native language and the tapes were transcribed into English • and the results analysed. The effects of the encroachment of Canadian society are readily seen and felt in these four communities. The degree of that effect varies from most severe in the Lac Seul First Nation through a somewhat lesser effect in Pikangikum and Big Trout to its least destructive manifestation in the Muskrat Dam First Nation. While the destruction which has occurred is not equal throughout the four First Nations, the prognosis for each is the same. If nothing is done to halt further encroachment, only increased disempowerment and assimilation lie ahead. Only 60 years ago, these communities had been little affected by colonization. Beyond being brought within the fur trade economy, the First Nations of Northwestern Ontario continued to live very much in accord with the traditions handed down from the past. The elders described a complex social control system which clearly has elements which meet any definition of a justice system. At the service of the community and its leaders was a social control system which offered different instruments for different degrees of need. The formal "Circle" process was used to deal with serious behavior and also to publicize what the leaders thought was appropriate behavior. Each of the clan-based groups which made up the larger community had one or more designated persons participating in the Circle. Meetings of the circle would be held where matters arising were discussed and dealt with. It . would appear that the needs of both victim and wrongdoer would be dealt with in an atmosphere where caring and the healing of community relationships was the prime motivator. Chiefs and the designated persons also had formal roles which required then to police the community and intervene where appropriate. Through public meetings Chiefs also kept community members informed of what was considered appropriate conduct. The Chiefs had an informal role in the community visiting people and making sure that everyone was cared for and had a sufficient supply of necessities. In the 1920s and 1930s, when the elders participating in this study were young, the effects of contact on traditional justice were already visible. Lac Seul, the most southern band, was already beginning to be brought within the white justice system. Pikangikum, less impacted, was beginning to experiment with some aspects of the white justice system. In the north, at Big Trout Lake and Muskrat Dam, the traditional practices was beginning to be used to serve the needs of the Indian Agent. Massive changes have happened in the last 60 years with the most severe effects taking place since 1950. The once peaceful communities are all experiencing rising crime rates. The complete social control system no longer functions in Big Trout Lake which is now policed by the OPP supported by First Nations constables and offenders are now tried by the Ontario Courts. In Pikangikum even more elements of the white justice system can be found. Along with the OPP and the Courts, the Native Justice of the Peace Courts hold regular and frequent hearings in the community. Legal Aid services are provided through a Community Legal Independent First Nations Alliance ii Big Trout Lake, Lac Seul, Muskrat Dam, Pikangikum Worker from the Nishnawbe-Aski Legal Services Corporation who lives in the community. • In Lac Seul today, almost all matters of social control are dealt with by agencies which are resident outside of the community. Lac Seul is policed by the Sioux Lookout detachment of the OPP and offenders attend court in Sioux Lookout. Only Muskrat Dam offers grounds for hope. There, the traditional practices have been successfully brought into the present. The OPP have only been called upon 3 times in the history of the community and the Ontario Courts only once. But even there the future is clouded. Already this year, the OPP have been called in three more times and another court date is scheduled. Without help, it would appear that Muskrat Dam too, traditional justice is threatened. Analysis of the causes of the destruction of traditional social control methods reveals that the present policies and practice of the federal and provincial governments are destructive of traditional justice. The destructive forces are both direct and indirect. The fragmented, departmentalized approach of Canadian authorities to government are antithetical to the holistic First Nations approach to government and justice. White society deals with justice in isolation from other aspects of community relations. In First Nations, all aspects are equally important. Canadian authorities fund roles in the community that support their needs but often fail to provide funding for matters essential to community needs. They fund many of the key players in traditional justice, such as Chief and Council, to perform new tasks related to the national scheme. While funding them in their new role, the authorities fail to provide funding to replace them in their old roles. Similarly, while the authorities provide apparently unlimited funding to take their justice system to the communities, they provide no funding to support the development of traditional mechanisms. Alcohol, residential schools, loss of control over education generally, and the imposition of Canadian game, fish and other laws on First Nations have all contributed to the destruction of traditional systems in the communities. This research demonstrates that today the process of colonization is ongoing and that First,. Nations justice is one of its major targets. We also suggest that the role of the federal and \ provincial governments in this is advertent. The Independent First Nations Alliance and the member First Nations have long been seeking to preserve and revitalize traditional justice.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wednesday, April 29, 2015
    SIOUX LOOKOUT HUB OF THE NORTH 100years The Sioux Lookout Bulletin AD PROOF CHECK YOUR AD FOR THE FOLLOWINGCome Celebrate In [email protected] Fax: 807-737-3084 Tel: 807-737-3209 *Be sure to provide an alternate contact phone # and email. CLIENT, 1ST INSERT, D_Dingwall-150429-Teaser COLOUR Colour COLUMN: 2.38 in Names Dates / Times / Location2 of0 Your1 Event2 PROJECT: OR B&W: www.siouxlookout2012.ca Prices Contact Info PREPARED BY: Production B DEPTH: 2.8 in Spelling Colour / B&W FILE: “X:\Production\Ad Archives\Ads 2015\15 04 29\D_Dingwall-150429-Teaser\D_Dingwall-150429-Teaser.indd” VERSION: 1 Run dates Advertising material designed by The Sioux Lookout Bulletin is strictly for use by The Sioux Lookout Bulletin and will remain their property until a copyright purchase fee has been invoiced to the client. OPTION FOR SIGNATURE If no reply is given by Friday at 4:00 your ad will appear as is in the paper that you have booked it to run and you will be charged accordingly. SIOUX LOOKOUT 2011H UF150B OF THE S/CABNORTH 4X4 XTR 100years #S1196A – 5.0l, XLT package, liner, steps and more. $ Com17,974*e Celebrate In *or as low as $144* b/w + tax. *includes2 admin.fee01 and2 Carproof. Plus tax. O.A.C. www.siouxwwlowo.skioouxuloto2k0ou1t20.1c2a.ca Dingwall Ford Sales Ltd. 737-3440 MONDAY - FRIDAY 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM SAT. 9:00 AM - 12:00PM Volume 24, No. 25 www.siouxbulletin.com Wednesday, April 29, 2015 SIOUX LOOKOUT HUB OF THE NORTH ears SIOUX Ontario0y governmentLOOKOUT 10 HUB OF THE NORTH transferring10 0landyears to Mishkeegogamang Come Celebrate In Shayla Bradley negotiators for Canada, Ontario, STAFF W2RITER012 MOFN, and Slate Falls First HE Ontario Ministry of Nation were able to settle the Natural Resources and outstanding issues associated TForestry (MNRF) is with the civil action commenced working on transferring Crown by MOFN and Slate Falls First land to Mishkeegogamang Nation,” said Kowalski.
    [Show full text]
  • Recruit, Prepare, and Support Outstanding Teachers
    Teach For Canada OUR VISION AND COMMUNITY-BASED APPROACH Teach For Canada is a non-profit organization that works with northern communities to recruit, prepare, and support outstanding teachers. 1 Our vision is that all children have access to a high quality education in their community. What we do: RECRUIT Since 2015, Teach For Canada has recruited and selected 155 teachers through a rigorous, community-led interview process. PREPARE Each teacher completes a 3 week summer training program before going North. SUPPORT Teachers make a 2+ year teaching commitment, and Teach For Canada offers professional, personal, and peer support to help them succeed in the classroom and community. PARTNER Teach For Canada currently works with 19 First Nations partners in Northern Ontario. In 2019, we plan to partner with First Nations in northern Manitoba for the first time. Together, we can make education more equal. 2 Our Values and Culture OUR VALUES Humility Respect Collaboration We aspire to recognize our own We recognize and value First Nations We are committed to working with limitations, and we appreciate that our autonomy and teacher diversity, and teachers, First Nations, and related efforts complement the work of First we treat everyone with kindness and groups to build programs that are Nations, peer organizations, and many consideration. informed by communities and focused others in a movement towards equity on students. in First Nations education. Integrity Learning We strive to build authentic We constantly seek to improve by relationships based on trust and listening, self-reflecting, and finding openness. opportunities for individual and organizational growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2007, the Union of Ontario Indians Began Conducting Regional Consultation Sessions on Matrimonial Real Property (MRP)
    Volume 19 Issue 1 Published monthly by the Union of Ontario Indians - Anishinabek Nation Single Copy: $2.00 January/February 2007 IN THE NEWS Chiefs predict year of defi ance TORONTO (CP) – Canada should police tried to evict the protesters. aboriginal observers say. There are 1,000 outstanding brace for more dramatic displays of They succeeded only in fanning the Already this year police and land claims across Canada, and Little NHL aboriginal defi ance in 2007, warn fl ames of rebellion: reinforcements armed forces have been keeping “any one of them could trigger Native leaders who say the First descended en masse from the a careful eye on developments the same reaction,’’ said Ontario coming soon Nations frustrations that boiled neighbouring reserve, the most at the eastern Ontario town of regional chief Angus Toulouse. SUDBURY – The Ojibwe Cultural over in a small Ontario town may populous in Deseronto, where activists from “That’s the unfortunate thing Foundation is the host of this year’s well be a tipping point for decades Canada. nearby Tyendinaga Mohawk – we’re going to see much more Little Native Hockey League of simmering aboriginal anger. Since then, Territory are threatening to block of that. There is a sense nationally Tournament It was in the bedroom the Caledonia a developer’s plans to construct a and regionally that there is this being held March 11-15 in community of Caledonia, Ont., dispute has 140-home waterfront subdivision frustration.’’ Sudbury. This which borders the massive Six become a on disputed land. The land claim, Aboriginals have lost their tournament is Nations reserve in southwestern lightning which was fi led in 1995 and never land over the years, Toulouse expected to draw Ontario, where that anger seeped rod for resolved, essentially bisects the said, making it more diffi cult for entries from 100 quietly into a nondescript, half- deep-seated town of Deseronto.
    [Show full text]
  • Address of the Lac Seul First Nation To
    L ac Seul Band No. 20 P.O. BOX 100, HUDSON, ONTARIO POV 1X0 Telephone (807) 582-3503 ADDRESS OF THE LAC SEUL FIRST NATION TO: THE 1991 SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WORKING GROUP ON INDIGENOUS POPULATIONS PRESENTED BY: ROGER SOUTHWIND CHIEF, LAC SEUL FIRST NATION On behalf of the three communities of Kejick Bay, Frenchman’s Head and Whitefish Bay whose members form the Lac Seul First Nation, I offer my greetings as Chief of the Lac Seul First Nation to the members of the Working Group and to all participants at the 1991 session of the United Nations Working Group on Indigenous Populations. Boojoo. I am here today together with other representatives of indigenous First Nations from Northwestern Ontario, Canada. We come a region of y the country noted for the beauty of its lands and waters. As Anishinaabe people, we often refer to the place we live on Lac Seul as Obiishikookang. This means the strait of the white pines. Let me describe to you a little about Lac Seul. This lake which is in the heart of the Lac Seul First Nation territory is some 120 kilometres long and is fed by rivers rich in fish and wildlife. |lik e many other First Nation communities in the Treaty 3 region of Northwestern Ontario, th ^ Lac Seul First Nation territory forms part of a region that is at a watershed point^Given the powerful forces that have been developed for resource exploitation, our customary territories and our communities, which are at the frontier of this exploitation, will be the communities which mus; have the greatest influence in developing models of sustainable resource use or they will be communities which suffer dislocations that First Nation communities have rarely seen before in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • LAC SEUL DRINKING WATER - BACKGROUND ASSESSMENT Information for the Ontario Regional Director General
    LAC SEUL DRINKING WATER - BACKGROUND ASSESSMENT Information for the Ontario Regional Director General DATE: 31 January 2018 SUMMARY • Lac Seul First Nation’s 15 year boil water advisory must be resolved as part of Indigenous Services Canada’s objective to end all long-term drinking water advisories by March 2021. • Lac Seul faces a unique challenge to operating and maintaining a safe water system due to geography that necessitates three separate systems, two on opposite shorelines and one on an island. • Funding for Kejick Bay Water Treatment Plant was approved in 2015, however the project remains in the design stage despite the initial expectation for construction to start two years ago. Completion is planned for March 2020. BACKGROUND Indigenous Services Canada has committed to ending all long-term drinking water advisories by March 2021. • Lac Seul is geographically fragmented into three settlements (Frenchman’s Head, Kejick Bay, and Whitefish Bay) on two shorelines and an island, and thus has three separate water systems. Drinking water advisories do not necessarily apply to all settlements simultaneously. • New boil water advisory was established for Whitefish Bay in October 2017 due to a leak in the distribution system. • Current long-term boil water advisory specific to Kejick Bay and was first established in February 2003. Public Works notified community members of a leak in the distribution system in May 2017, further disrupting the water supply. Current funding and water system-related projects for Lac Seul First Nation Kejick Bay Water Treatment Plant: • $5.4 million project approved in 2015; costs shared through Federal, Provincial and First Nation funding.
    [Show full text]
  • K-Net / Lac Seul Case Study
    CWIRP – COMMUNITY WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH PROJECT1 Author: Adam Fiser Draft 1.0 – 3/29/07 K-Net / Lac Seul Case Study 1 Production of this case study has been made possible through a financial contribution from Infrastructure Canada. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Government of Canada. COMMUNITY WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH PROJECT K-Net / Lac Seul Case Study Map www.cwirp.ca Production of this case study has been made possible through a financial contribution from Infrastructure Canada. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Government of Canada. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 16. Financial and Other Resources 16 1.1 Brief Case Study History 1 7. Community 19 1.2 Mission Statement and Goals 2 7.1 External Stakeholders 19 1.3 Network Type 37.2 Impact and Benefits 19 2. Organization 47.3 Community Profile 20 2.1 Network Manager Role and Responsibilities 4 7.4 Policy / Regulatory / Legal Context 21 2.2 K-Net Services’ Role 58. Critical Success Factors and 2.3 Superior Wireless’ Role 5 Lessons Learned 22 2.4 Organizational Change in 2006 6 9. Assessment 23 3. ICT Infrastructure 79.1 How well has this organization/network done 3.1 WiFi radio configuration 7 in meeting its stated objectives? 23 3.2 3.5 GHz Licensed Spectrum Radio 9.2 Does this network/organization provide Configuration 8a public benefit? How? 23 3.3 Challenges 109.3 What are the strengths and weaknesses of this 4. Key Services 11 network/organization? 23 4.1 WiFi 119.4 How could this network / organization 4.2 Web Portal & Email 11 be improved? 24 4.3 Education 11Appendix A: K-Net Services Request for Funds 4.4 Telemedicine 12Template used in 2003 proposal to FedNor 25 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 2 Connecting 17 Remote First Nation Communities NOTICE of COMPLETION and OPPORTUNITY to INSPECT the FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL S
    Phase 2 Connecting 17 Remote First Nation Communities NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT The Project: Wataynikaneyap Power L.P. is a licensed transmission company majority owned by First Nations. The First Nations ownership interest is equally owned by 22 First Nation communities, and a minority interest in the partnership is owned by Fortis Inc. The Wataynikaneyap Transmission Project Phase 2 (the Project) includes approximately 1,500 km of 115 kV, 44 kV and 25 kV transmission lines and associated facilities for subsystems north of Pickle Lake and Red Lake that will connect 17 remote First Nation communities, currently powered by diesel generation, to the provincial electrical grid. Figure 1 (see reverse) identifies the Project location and transmission and alternative corridors. The Project has been identified as one of the priority projects in Ontario’s Long‐Term Energy Plan, and Wataynikaneyap has been selected as the designated transmitter to connect communities. Wataynikaneyap’s principal purpose is to provide safe, accessible and clean electrical power to remote First Nation communities and to decrease the reliance on diesel‐powered energy generation which, consequently, will provide environmental, economic, social, quality‐of‐life and health benefits. Environmental Assessment (EA) Process: The Project is subject to the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act and to Section 67 of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 for the portions of the transmission line on First Nation reserve lands. The Final Environmental Study Report (ESR) has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the following Class EA processes: Class Environmental Assessment for Minor Transmission Facilities (Ontario Hydro, 1992) (for applicable 115 kV sections and associated infrastructure).
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Canada
    File No 35379 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ONAPPFALFROMAJUDGMENfOF1HEffiURI'OFAPPFALFORONfARIO) BETWEEN: ANDREW KEEWATIN JR. and JOSEPH WILLIAM FOBISTER on their own behalf and on behalf of all other members of GRASSY NARROWS FIRST NATION APPELLANTS (Plaintiffs) - and- - MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES -and- RESOLUTE FP CANADA INC. (formerly ABITIBI-CONSOLIDATED INC.) RESPONDENTS (Defendants) - and- - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA RESPONDENT (Third Party) - and- LESLIE CAMERON on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of W ABAUSKANG FIRST NATION RESPONDENT (Interveners) - and­ GOLDCORP INC. RESPONDENT (Intervener) (Style of Cause continues inside cover pages) JOINT MEMORANDUM OF ARGUMENT BY LAC SEUL FIRST NATION and SANDY LAKE FIRST NATION, INTERVENERS -and- AITORNEY GENERAL OF MANITOBA, AITORNEY GENERAL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, AITORNEY GENERAL OF SASKATCHEWAN, A ITORNEY GENERAL OF ALBERTA, THE GRAND COUNCIL OF TREATY #3, BLOOD TRIBE, BEAVER LAKE CREE NATION, ERMINESKIN CREE NATION, SIKSIKA NATION, and WHITEFISH LAKE NATION #128, FORT MCKAY FIRST NATION, TE'ME:XWTREATY ASSOCIATION, OCHIICHAGWE'BABIGO'INING FIRST NATION,OJIBWAYS OF ONIGAMING FIRST NATION, BIG GRASSY FIRST NATION, and NAOTKAMEGWANNING FIRST NATION, METIS NATION OF ONTARIO, COWICHAN TRIBES, represented by CHIEF WILLIAM CHARLES SEYMOUR, on his own behalf and on behalf of the members of COWICHAN TRIBES, LAC SEUL FIRST NATION, SANDY LAKE FIRST NATION Interveners AND BETWEEN: LESLIE CAMERON on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members ofWABAUSKANG FIRST NATION APPELLANTS (Interveners) - and- ANDREW KEEWATIN JR. and JOSEPH WILLIAM FOBISTER on their own behalf and on behalf of all other members of GRASSY NARROWS FIRST NATION RESPONDENTS (Plaintiffs) - and - MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES and RESOLUTE FP CANADA INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Factum
    File No. 35379 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) BETWEEN: ANDREW KEEWATIN JR. and JOSEPH WILLIAM FOBISTER on their own behalf and on behalf of all other members of GRASSY NARROWS FIRST NATION APPELLANTS (Plaintiffs) -and- MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES and RESOLUTE FP CANADA INC. (formerly ABITIBI-CONSOLIDATED INC.) RESPONDENTS (Defendants) -and- THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA RESPONDENT (Third Party) -and- LESLIE CAMERON on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of WABAUSKANG FIRST NATION RESPONDENT (Interveners) -and- GOLDCORP INC. RESPONDENT (Intervener) (Style of cause continues inside cover pages) FACTUM OF THE RESPONDENT (THIRD PARTY) THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA AND BETWEEN: LESLIE CAMERON on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of WABAUSKANG FIRST NATION APPELLANTS (Interveners) -and- ANDREW KEEWATIN JR. and JOSEPH WILLIAM FOBISTER on their own behalf and on behalf of all other members of GRASSY NARROWS FIRST NATION RESPONDENTS (Plaintiffs) -and- MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES and RESOLUTE FP CANADA INC. (formerly ABITIBI-CONSOLIDATED INC.) RESPONDENTS (Defendants) -and- THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA RESPONDENT (Third Party) -and- GOLDCORP INC. RESPONDENT (Intervener) Mark R. Kindrachuk, Q.C. Christopher M. Rupar Mitchell R. Taylor, Q.C. Attorney General of Canada Department of Justice Canada 50 O’Connor Street 123 - 2nd Avenue South, 10th Floor Suite 500, Room 557 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K7E6 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6L2 Tel.: 306 975-4765 Tel.: 613 941-2351 / 613 370 6290 Fax: 306 975-5013 Fax: 613 954-1920 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Attorney General of Canada Agent for Attorney General of Canada Robert J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing As a Health Determinant in the First Nations Community of Northwestern Ontario
    Housing as a Health Determinant 71 SUFFERING AN EXCESSIVE BURDEN: HOUSING AS A HEALTH DETERMINANT IN THE FIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY OF NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO Robert Robson Department of Indigenous Learning Lakehead University Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada, P7B 5E1 [email protected] Abstract / Résumé On-reserve housing in Canada is, according to the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, “in a bad state.” A large portion of the estimated 89,000 on-reserve houses in Canada, are in poor condition, overcrowded, im- properly serviced, poorly sited and generally, inappropriate given the cul- turally based shelter needs of the approximated 423,000 on-reserve resi- dents. In Ontario, where the estimated 19,667 on-reserve houses accom- modate a population of approximately 74,676, housing units too are in poor condition. In the Treaty 3 area of northwestern Ontario, the twenty- six reserve community’s 2,182 housing units are also less than adequate in meeting the shelter needs of the reserve population. Inadequate hous- ing raises the spectra of housing related health concerns. Ranging from tuberculosis to shigellosis right through to mental health issues, inad- equate housing and the variety of health issues related to inadequate hous- ing suggests that on-reserve housing is, in many ways, a health risk. Selon la Commission royale sur les peuples autochtones, le logement dans les réserves canadiennes est « en mauvais état ». Au Canada, on évalue que bon nombre des 89 000 maisons dans les réserves sont en mauvais état, surpeuplées, insuffisamment entretenues, mal situées et généralement inappropriées, compte tenu des besoins en logement culturellement fondés des quelque 423 000 résidants des réserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018-2019
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018-2019 WE REMEMBER TINA KAKEPETUM SCHULTZ (1953 - 2018) Sioux Lookout First Nations Health Authority (SLFNHA) dedicates this Annual Report to the late Tina Kakepetum Schultz of Keewaywin First Nation. Tina began at Keewaytinook Okimakanak (K.O.). eHealth services and then moved on to serve as Health Director for Keewaytinook Okimakanak. Prior to working at K.O. She worked in theatre and her playwriting incorporated her love of her peoples’ strengths and struggles. It also included her love of opera music. This love began while she attended residential school and opera was played to soothe the children at bedtime. She brought this love into her work in the health field when she moved to Red Lake with her husband in 2001. Her passionate desire was to improve the comprehensive need for health services in the communities that she served underlined by a strong sense of community and self. Tina was a Keewaywin band member. She was born on a trapline and overcame many difficulties that she faced during her lifetime. She raised three boys and loved them dearly and was proud of them beyond words. Family was everything to Tina. This love extended to her many grandchildren and her three great grandchildren. Children of the remote north were the driving force in her desire to think outside of the “western box” way of thinking and create a substantial change that would have direct and real results in peoples’ daily lives. Tina also hoped that future changes would improve children and peoples’ quality of life. Tina saw this “quality of life” shift as a change that would include peoples’ joy which came from residing in the north, near the land, and the capabilities that recent developments allowed them such as video/medical technology.
    [Show full text]