DOCSLIB.ORG

Synergies Between World Heritage Sites and Key Biodiversity Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Synergies Between World Heritage Sites and Key Biodiversity Areas See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270584153 Synergies between World Heritage Sites and Key Biodiversity Areas Article · January 2010 CITATIONS READS 3 104 11 authors, including: Russell A Mittermeier Bastian Bertzky Conservation International European Commission 227 PUBLICATIONS 31,277 CITATIONS 85 PUBLICATIONS 4,043 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Thomas Brooks Naamal De Silva International Union for Conservation of Nature George Washington University 248 PUBLICATIONS 22,669 CITATIONS 24 PUBLICATIONS 1,492 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Research supporting the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems View project BIOPAMA.org (Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management Programme) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Bastian Bertzky on 09 January 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. In Focus World Heritage sites and Key Biodiversity Areas Synergies between World Heritage sites and Key Biodiversity Areas Co-authors: Matthew N. Foster1, Russell A. Mittermeier1, Tim Badman2, Charles Besancon3, Bastian Bomhard3, Thomas M. Brooks4,5,6, Naamal De Silva1, Lincoln Fishpool7, Michael Parr8, Elizabeth Radford9, Will Turner1 The authors would also like to thank Kellee Koenig1, Josephine M. Langley2, Paul Matiku10, Earnest Mwongela10, Conrad Savy1, and Beth Newman9 for their contribution. International organizations that are seriously concerned with the SUHVHUYDWLRQRIELRGLYHUVLW\ZRUOGZLGH¿QGWKHPVHOYHVFRQIURQWHGZLWK WKHHQRUPRXVWDVNRILGHQWLI\LQJDQGHVWDEOLVKLQJDKLHUDUFK\RIVLWHVLQ QHHGRIWKHLUDWWHQWLRQ,QWKLVUHVSHFWWKH\KDYHEHFRPHLQFUHDVLQJO\ DZDUHRYHUWKH\HDUVRIWKHZRUNGRQHLQWKHIUDPHZRUNRIWKH:RUOG Heritage Convention, whose interests are convergent with their own. And while the goals of the Convention are broader than those of the ELRGLYHUVLW\ FRQVHUYDWLRQ FRPPXQLW\ WKH\ WRR H[SOLFLWO\ UHFRJQL]H YDOXHVIRUHFRV\VWHPVDQGWKUHDWHQHGKDELWDWVDQGVSHFLHV Mount Kenya National Park/Natural Forest (Kenya). © Travis Ferland 4 World Heritage No. 56 In Focus 1Conservation International 2International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) 3United Nations Environment Programme–World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) 4NatureServe 5World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF), University of the Philippines 6School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania 7BirdLife International 8American Bird Conservancy 9Plantlife International 10Nature Kenya 5 World Heritage No. 56 In Focus World Heritage sites and Key Biodiversity Areas The uKhahlamba / Drakensberg Park (South Africa). © Alun Williams ne of the ten World A set of common actions would simultaneously meet both Heritage criteria World Heritage and biodiversity conservation objectives. in the Operational Guidelines (criterion x), acknowledges the outstanding universal value of certain sites Identifying regions and sites A number of methods based on a variety because they ‘contain the most important Biodiversity, and the threats confronting of factors allow the selection of priority and significant natural habitats for in- it, vary widely around the world. This being regions for conservation. The biodiversity situ conservation of biological diversity, the case, we as a conservation community hotspots approach, introduced by Norman Oincluding those containing threatened must be at pains to identify the regions and Myers in 1988, is one such method. It species of outstanding universal value sites in need of immediate action to reduce uses the criteria of irreplaceability and from the point of view of science or the loss of biodiversity. vulnerability of taxa to determine which conservation’. Criterion (ix) further This is just as true in the case of the biogeographic regions most urgently need recognizes sites that are ‘outstanding World Heritage Convention when it comes the attention of conservationists. examples representing significant on- to identifying and protecting natural and Specifically, according to this method, going ecological and biological processes cultural sites, biodiversity sites included. in order for a region to be recognized as in the evolution and development of And so it appears, in principle, that a set a biodiversity hotspot, it must hold over terrestrial, fresh water, coastal and marine of common actions would simultaneously 1,500 species of endemic plants (this being ecosystems and communities of plants and meet both World Heritage and biodiversity a measure of irreplaceability) and it must animals’. conservation objectives. have lost over 70 per cent of its natural To date, 124 World Heritage sites have This potential for collaboration has yet habitat as a result of anthropogenic change been recognized under criterion (x) of to be fully realized in practice, but we can (this being a measure of vulnerability). the Convention, of which 82 are also nonetheless explore it further by taking a To date, 34 such biodiversity hotspots recognized under criterion (ix), so it appears closer look at the overlap of World Heritage have been identified. And while their obvious that the identification of areas of sites and areas of biodiversity conservation endemic population includes more than significance in terms of high biodiversity and priority, and by considering how the 50 per cent of the world’s plant species, that of sites important to the maintenance designation of sites that are important for they cover a mere 16 per cent of the Earth’s of cultural and natural heritage have a both cultural values and biodiversity can be land surface. We can usefully overlay the number of points in common. beneficial to all concerned. biodiversity hotspots with the set of World 6 World Heritage No. 56 In Focus biodiversitybiodiversity hotspot naturalNatural sitesite mixedMixed site site Wilderness Areas Figure 1: Natural and mixed World Heritage sites and biodiversity hotspots. © Conservation International Heritage sites (cultural, natural and mixed) that similar criteria could be usefully applied designated or approved at global level to determine whether the identification and to other taxa. This led to the emergence through the intergovernmental World listing of these sites has followed similar of Plantlife International’s Important Plant Heritage Committee. Key Biodiversity biogeographic patterns. Areas (IPAs), IUCN’s Important Freshwater Areas, in a striking parallel, are identified If we examine all World Heritage sites Areas, and other such approaches. nationally using locally available data. Such taken together, we see that 381 out of 878 In 2004, an umbrella approach – Key local knowledge serves to identify sites that (43 per cent) fall within the 34 biodiversity Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) – was proposed meet globally standardized criteria, and hotspots referred to above, and if we include that would allow the identification of these are approved at global level to ensure just those identified for natural criteria the important areas for multiple taxonomic consistent application of the selected results show that 93 out of 201 natural groups even as a partnership of over 60 criteria. and mixed sites (46 per cent) fall within the non-governmental organizations joined hotspots (Figure 1). These hotspots harbour forces in the Alliance for Zero Extinction Key Biodiversity Areas are sites of global nearly three times the share of World (AZE) and went on to identify the highest significance for biodiversity conservation. Heritage sites than might be expected given priority subset of Key Biodiversity Areas IBAs, IPAs and AZE sites each form a the slim 16 per cent of terrestrial area that around the world – those which hold the subset of KBAs based on more specific they cover. [NB: The dataset used for these last remaining population of a Critically criteria. figures is from 2008, when there were 878 Endangered (CR) or Endangered (EN) sites on the World Heritage List.] species, classified as such on the IUCN Red It remains however that a finer scale of List of Threatened Species. data on biodiversity yields an even better Key Biodiversity Areas thus provided parallel to site-level priorities identified the overarching term for sites of global through the World Heritage Convention. significance for biodiversity conservation, Over the past three decades, several with Important Bird Areas representing approaches for identifying sites of global the avian subset, Important Plant Areas importance for biodiversity conservation the plant subset, and the Alliance for Zero have emerged, the first being the concept Extinction sites signalling the highest priority of Important Bird Areas (IBAs), developed Key Biodiversity Areas overall (Figure 2). by BirdLife International. Specialists in other World Heritage sites are nominated taxonomic groups quickly began to sense through national and local efforts, and Figure 2. © Conservation International 7 World Heritage No. 56 In Focus World Heritage sites and Key Biodiversity Areas Comparing criteria Under the World Heritage Convention, countries may propose areas for inscription on the World Heritage List by referring to either cultural or natural criteria – or both. While the coincidence between cultural World Heritage sites and Key Biodiversity Areas is of interest given the manifold benefits that such sites provide, the more obvious comparison involves the 201 natural World Heritage sites currently (March 2010) listed under
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparative Osteology and Evolution of the Lungless Salamanders, Family Plethodontidae David B
    COMPARATIVE OSTEOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF THE LUNGLESS SALAMANDERS, FAMILY PLETHODONTIDAE DAVID B. WAKE1 ABSTRACT: Lungless salamanders of the family Plethodontidae comprise the largest and most diverse group of tailed amphibians. An evolutionary morphological approach has been employed to elucidate evolutionary rela­ tionships, patterns and trends within the family. Comparative osteology has been emphasized and skeletons of all twenty-three genera and three-fourths of the one hundred eighty-three species have been studied. A detailed osteological analysis includes consideration of the evolution of each element as well as the functional unit of which it is a part. Functional and developmental aspects are stressed. A new classification is suggested, based on osteological and other char­ acters. The subfamily Desmognathinae includes the genera Desmognathus, Leurognathus, and Phaeognathus. Members of the subfamily Plethodontinae are placed in three tribes. The tribe Hemidactyliini includes the genera Gyri­ nophilus, Pseudotriton, Stereochilus, Eurycea, Typhlomolge, and Hemidac­ tylium. The genera Plethodon, Aneides, and Ensatina comprise the tribe Pleth­ odontini. The highly diversified tribe Bolitoglossini includes three super­ genera. The supergenera Hydromantes and Batrachoseps include the nominal genera only. The supergenus Bolitoglossa includes Bolitoglossa, Oedipina, Pseudoeurycea, Chiropterotriton, Parvimolge, Lineatriton, and Thorius. Manculus is considered to be congeneric with Eurycea, and Magnadig­ ita is congeneric with Bolitoglossa. Two species are assigned to Typhlomolge, which is recognized as a genus distinct from Eurycea. No. new information is available concerning Haptoglossa. Recognition of a family Desmognathidae is rejected. All genera are defined and suprageneric groupings are defined and char­ acterized. Range maps are presented for all genera. Relationships of all genera are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Status and Sustainability of Yellow-Crested Cockatoo (Cacatua Sulphurea Sulphurea) on Pasoso Island, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 22, Number 6, June 2021 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 3277-3283 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d220633 Population status and sustainability of Yellow-crested cockatoo (Cacatua sulphurea sulphurea) on Pasoso Island, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia MOH. IHSAN1,2,♥, ANI MARDIASTUTI3, BURHANUDDIN MASY’UD3, YENI A. MULYANI3 1Program of Tropical Biodiversity Conservation, Department of Forest Resources, Conservation and Ecotourism, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Jl. Ulin LingkarAkademik, Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor 16680, West Java, Indonesia. ♥email: [email protected] 2Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Tadulako. Jl. Soekarno Hatta Km. 9, Kampus Bumi Tadulako, Tondo, Palu 94148, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia 3Department of Forest Resources, Conservation and Ecotourism, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Jl. Ulin Lingkar Akademik, Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor 16680, West Java, Indonesia Manuscript received: 31 March 2021. Revision accepted: 22 May 2021. Abstract. Ihsan M, Mardiastuti A, Masy’ud B, Mulyani YA. 2021. Population status and sustainability of Yellow-crested cockatoo (Cacatua sulphurea sulphurea) on Pasoso Island, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22: 3277-3283. Yellow-crested cockatoo (Cacatua sulphurea sulphurea) is a sub-species of Cacatua sulphurea which is spread in Sulawesi and several surrounding islands, including on Pasoso Island. This cockatoo population is under tremendous pressure until categorized as critical. So far, there is no comprehensive information about population status and sustainable population size. The objective of this research area was to assess the current status or size of the population, study the size of the sustainable population and study the determinants factor of the Yellow- crested cockatoo population sustainability on Pasoso Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Conservation of Threatened Bird Species at Laojunshan, Sichuan, China
    CLP Report Assessment and conservation of threatened bird species at Laojunshan, Sichuan, China Submitted by Jie Wang Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R.China E-mail:[email protected] To Conservation Leadership Programme, UK Contents 1. Summary 2. Study area 3. Avian fauna and conservation status of threatened bird species 4. Habitat analysis 5. Ecological assessment and community education 6. Outputs 7. Main references 8. Acknowledgements 1. Summary Laojunshan Nature Reserve is located at Yibin city, Sichuan province, south China. It belongs to eastern part of Liangshan mountains and is among the twenty-five hotspots of global biodiversity conservation. The local virgin alpine subtropical deciduous forests are abundant, which are actually rare at the same latitudes and harbor a tremendous diversity of plant and animal species. It is listed as a Global 200 ecoregion (WWF), an Important Bird Area (No. CN205), and an Endemic Bird Area (No. D14) (Stattersfield, et al . 1998). However, as a nature reserve newly built in 1999, it is only county-level and has no financial support from the central government. Especially, it is quite lack of scientific research, for example, the avifauna still remains unexplored except for some observations from bird watchers. Furthermore, the local community is extremely poor and facing modern development pressures, unmanaged human activities might seriously disturb the local ecosystem. We conducted our project from April to June 2007, funded by Conservation Leadership Programme. Two fieldwork strategies were used: “En bloc-Assessment” to produce an avifauna census and ecological assessments; "Special Survey" to assess the conservation status of some threatened endemic bird species.
    [Show full text]
  • Synchrotron Microtomography Applied to the Volumetric Analysis of Internal Structures of Thoropa Miliaris Tadpoles G
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Synchrotron microtomography applied to the volumetric analysis of internal structures of Thoropa miliaris tadpoles G. Fidalgo1*, K. Paiva1, G. Mendes1, R. Barcellos1, G. Colaço2, G. Sena1, A. Pickler1, C. L. Mota1, G. Tromba3, L. P. Nogueira4, D. Braz5, H. R. Silva2, M. V. Colaço1 & R. C. Barroso1 Amphibians are models for studying applied ecological issues such as habitat loss, pollution, disease, and global climate change due to their sensitivity and vulnerability to changes in the environment. Developmental series of amphibians are informative about their biology, and X-ray based 3D reconstruction holds promise for quantifying morphological changes during growth—some with a direct impact on the possibility of an experimental investigation on several of the ecological topics listed above. However, 3D resolution and discrimination of their soft tissues have been difcult with traditional X-ray computed tomography, without time-consuming contrast staining. Tomographic data were initially performed (pre-processing and reconstruction) using the open- source software tool SYRMEP Tomo Project. Data processing and analysis of the reconstructed tomography volumes were conducted using the segmentation semi-automatic settings of the software Avizo Fire 8, which provide information about each investigated tissues, organs or bone elements. Hence, volumetric analyses were carried out to quantify the development of structures in diferent tadpole developmental stages. Our work shows that synchrotron X-ray microtomography using phase-contrast mode resolves the edges of the internal tissues (as well as overall tadpole morphology), facilitating the segmentation of the investigated tissues. Reconstruction algorithms and segmentation software played an important role in the qualitative and quantitative analysis of each target structure of the Thoropa miliaris tadpole at diferent stages of development, providing information on volume, shape and length.
    [Show full text]
  • Turdoides Affinis Mitogenome Reveals the Translational Efficiency And
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Turdoides afnis mitogenome reveals the translational efciency and importance of NADH dehydrogenase complex‑I in the Leiothrichidae family Indrani Sarkar1,4, Prateek Dey1,4, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma1*, Swapna Devi Ray1, Venkata Hanumat Sastry Kochiganti2, Renu Singh2, Padmanabhan Pramod1 & Ram Pratap Singh1,3* Mitochondrial genome provides useful information about species concerning its evolution and phylogenetics. We have taken the advantage of high throughput next‑generation sequencing technique to sequence the complete mitogenome of Yellow‑billed babbler (Turdoides afnis), a species endemic to Peninsular India and Sri Lanka. Both, reference‑based and de‑novo assemblies of mitogenome were performed and observed that de‑novo assembled mitogenome was most appropriate. The complete mitogenome of yellow‑billed babbler (assembled de‑novo) was 17,672 bp in length with 53.2% AT composition. Thirteen protein‑coding genes along with two rRNAs and 22 tRNAs were detected. The arrangement pattern of these genes was found conserved among Leiothrichidae family mitogenomes. Duplicated control regions were found in the newly sequenced mitogenome. Downstream bioinformatics analysis revealed the efect of translational efciency and purifying selection pressure over thirteen protein‑coding genes in yellow‑billed babbler mitogenome. Ka/Ks analysis indicated the highest synonymous substitution rate in the nad6 gene. Evolutionary analysis revealed the conserved nature of all the protein‑coding genes across Leiothrichidae family mitogenomes. Our limited phylogeny results placed T. afnis in a separate group, a sister group of Garrulax. Overall, our results provide a useful information for future studies on the evolutionary and adaptive mechanisms of birds belong to the Leiothrichidae family.
    [Show full text]
  • I Online Supplementary Data – Sexual Size Dimorphism in Salamanders
    Online Supplementary data – Sexual size dimorphism in salamanders Supplementary data S1. Species data used in this study and references list. Males Females SSD Significant test Ref Species n SVL±SD n SVL±SD Andrias davidianus 2 532.5 8 383.0 -0.280 12 Cryptobranchus alleganiensis 53 277.4±5.2 52 300.9±3.4 0.084 Yes 61 Batrachuperus karlschmidti 10 80.0 10 84.8 0.060 26 Batrachuperus londongensis 20 98.6 10 96.7 -0.019 12 Batrachuperus pinchonii 5 69.6 5 74.6 0.070 26 Batrachuperus taibaiensis 11 92.9±12.1 9 102.1±7.1 0.099 Yes 27 Batrachuperus tibetanus 10 94.5 10 92.8 -0.017 12 Batrachuperus yenyuadensis 10 82.8 10 74.8 -0.096 26 Hynobius abei 24 57.8±2.1 34 55.0±1.2 -0.048 Yes 92 Hynobius amakusaensis 22 75.4±4.8 12 76.5±3.6 0.014 No 93 Hynobius arisanensis 72 54.3±4.8 40 55.2±4.8 0.016 No 94 Hynobius boulengeri 37 83.0±5.4 15 91.5±3.8 0.102 Yes 95 Hynobius formosanus 15 53.0±4.4 8 52.4±3.9 -0.011 No 94 Hynobius fuca 4 50.9±2.8 3 52.8±2.0 0.037 No 94 Hynobius glacialis 12 63.1±4.7 11 58.9±5.2 -0.066 No 94 Hynobius hidamontanus 39 47.7±1.0 15 51.3±1.2 0.075 Yes 96 Hynobius katoi 12 58.4±3.3 10 62.7±1.6 0.073 Yes 97 Hynobius kimurae 20 63.0±1.5 15 72.7±2.0 0.153 Yes 98 Hynobius leechii 70 61.6±4.5 18 66.5±5.9 0.079 Yes 99 Hynobius lichenatus 37 58.5±1.9 2 53.8 -0.080 100 Hynobius maoershanensis 4 86.1 2 80.1 -0.069 101 Hynobius naevius 72.1 76.7 0.063 102 Hynobius nebulosus 14 48.3±2.9 12 50.4±2.1 0.043 Yes 96 Hynobius osumiensis 9 68.4±3.1 15 70.2±3.0 0.026 No 103 Hynobius quelpaertensis 41 52.5±3.8 4 61.3±4.1 0.167 Yes 104 Hynobius
    [Show full text]
  • Liocichla Omeiensis), a Vulnerable Babbler Endemic to Southwestern China Yiqiang Fu1, Benping Chen2, Simon D
    Fu et al. Avian Res (2016) 7:18 DOI 10.1186/s40657-016-0054-1 Avian Research RESEARCH Open Access Nest predators, nest‑site selection and nest success of the Emei Shan Liocichla (Liocichla omeiensis), a vulnerable babbler endemic to southwestern China Yiqiang Fu1, Benping Chen2, Simon D. Dowell3 and Zhengwang Zhang4* Abstract Background: The Emei Shan Liocichla (Liocichla omeiensis) is a globally vulnerable babbler, endemic to southwest- ern China. We investigated its nest predators, nest-site selection and nest success at the Laojunshan National Nature Reserve in Sichuan, China in order to identify the precise nesting-habitat requirements of the species, and to test whether the nest-site-selection cues, preferred by the Emei Shan Liocichla, are positively associated with nest success. Methods: We used infrared cameras to determine nest predators. We compared the microhabitat attributes between nest and random sites, as well as successful and failed nests. We used Binary Logistic Regression to determine the most important variables affecting nest-site selection of the Emei Shan Liocichla. We used the nest survival analysis in Program MARK to estimate daily nest survival rates (DSR). Nest success was calculated using the Mayfield method. Results: In total 56 nests were found. The DSR for all nests that contained at least one egg was 0.9564 0.0091 (95 % CI 0.9346–0.9711) (n 40), while the total nest success was 27.5 %. We identified four categories of predators± in 10 nest predation events,= i.e. squirrels (n 5), snakes (n 3), raptors (n 1) and wasps (n 1). We found that: (1) nest predation was the primary reason for =nest failure of the= Emei Shan Liocichla,= (2) tree cover,= bamboo cover, liana abun- dance and distance to forest edge or gap were the most important variables affecting nest-site selection of this spe- cies, and (3) the nest-site-selection variables we measured appeared not to be positively associated with nest success.
    [Show full text]
  • Zooquaria Spring 2020
    QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS AND AQUARIA SPRINGZ 2020 OO QUARIAISSUE 108 A NOBLE CAUSE SAVING THE DANISH NOBLE CHAFER WHICH FISH? CAMPAIGNING DURING A GLOBAL PANDEMIC 1 BUILDING A FOOD FOREST BEHIND THE SCENES AT A NEW PRIMATE EXHIBIT Elegant enclosures with Webnet The robust wire rope net Webnet enables the realisation of the typically delicate and customized solutions. Jakob Rope Systems supplies both materials and know-how to create functional yet architecturally sophisticated animal enclosures. jakob.com Contents Zooquaria Spring 2020 12 14 4 From the Director’s chair 18 Shifting the population How Covid-19 has affected the EAZA community management paradigm Some insights into the effectiveness of the new 5 From our Chairman RCP process A message of support for EAZA Members 20 A plan for the cinereous vulture 6 Noticeboard An update on the Cinereous vulture EEP Decisions from the latest EAZA Council Meeting 22 Planning for a revolution 7 Just keep swimming How CPSG Europe is ramping up its efforts for An update on our new Which Fish? campaign species conservation 8 Births & hatchings 24 Saving the Danish noble chafer The latest success stories from EAZA zoos Reporting on a new conservation project at Copenhagen Zoo 10 Let’s help nature become part of the solution 26 Taking action for Indonesia Zooquaria talks to Luc Bas, Director of IUCN How threatened ungulates benefited from the first European Regional Office ever Action Indonesia Day 12 A bright future for songbirds 27 Flexible funding for a brighter
    [Show full text]
  • Bugun Liocichla Liocichla Bugunorum Sp
    82 Indian Birds Vol. 2 No. 4 (July-August 2006) A new species of Liocichla (Aves: Timaliidae) from Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India Ramana Athreya Athreya, R. 2006. A new species of Liocichla (Aves: Timaliidae) from Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Indian Birds 2 (4): 82-94. Publication date: 8 September 2006. Ramana Athreya, National Centre for Radio Astrophysics (TIFR), P.O. Bag 3, Pune University Campus, Pune 411007, India. Email: [email protected] This paper describes a new bird species of the genus Liocichla discovered near Eaglenest Wildlife Sanc- tuary in western Arunachal Pradesh, India. While the taxon most closely resembles L. omeiensis, an endemic of China, the many points of difference in plumage, size and vocalisations indicate a new species. The known population is very small and only three (breeding?) pairs responded to song play- back in May 2006. The plumage and the vocalisations are distinctive and therefore the paucity of records suggests a small and highly localized population. 1. A new species of liocichla releasing it in the same area on the same day after obtaining 1.1 The genus Liocichla photographs and detailed notes on its plumage. The iocichlas are an Asian babbler genus hitherto similarities between the Eaglenest taxon and L. omeiensis comprising three allopatric species. Red-faced suggest that they are closely related, but the many differences L Liocichla Liocichla phoenicea (Gould, 1837) [formerly in plumage and vocalisations—especially song—indicate a Crimson-winged Laughingthrush Garrulax phoeniceus] is new species and therefore I propose to name it: widely distributed from north-eastern India to north-western Vietnam through northern Myanmar, southern Yunnan Bugun Liocichla Liocichla bugunorum sp.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Scenario of Hox Gene Inventory Variation Among Major Sarcopterygian Lineages Dan Liang1†, Riga Wu1†, Jie Geng1, Chaolin Wang2, Peng Zhang1*
    Liang et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011, 11:25 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/25 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access A general scenario of Hox gene inventory variation among major sarcopterygian lineages Dan Liang1†, Riga Wu1†, Jie Geng1, Chaolin Wang2, Peng Zhang1* Abstract Background: Hox genes are known to play a key role in shaping the body plan of metazoans. Evolutionary dynamics of these genes is therefore essential in explaining patterns of evolutionary diversity. Among extant sarcopterygians comprising both lobe-finned fishes and tetrapods, our knowledge of the Hox genes and clusters has largely been restricted in several model organisms such as frogs, birds and mammals. Some evolutionary gaps still exist, especially for those groups with derived body morphology or occupying key positions on the tree of life, hindering our understanding of how Hox gene inventory varied along the sarcopterygian lineage. Results: We determined the Hox gene inventory for six sarcopterygian groups: lungfishes, caecilians, salamanders, snakes, turtles and crocodiles by comprehensive PCR survey and genome walking. Variable Hox genes in each of the six sarcopterygian group representatives, compared to the human Hox gene inventory, were further validated for their presence/absence by PCR survey in a number of related species representing a broad evolutionary coverage of the group. Turtles, crocodiles, birds and placental mammals possess the same 39 Hox genes. HoxD12 is absent in snakes, amphibians and probably lungfishes. HoxB13 is lost in frogs and caecilians. Lobe-finned fishes, amphibians and squamate reptiles possess HoxC3. HoxC1 is only present in caecilians and lobe-finned fishes. Similar to coelacanths, lungfishes also possess HoxA14, which is only found in lobe-finned fishes to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Privately Protected Areas Guidelines for Privately Protected Areas Brent A
    Guidelines for privately protected areas Guidelines for privately protected Guidelines for privately protected areas Brent A. Mitchell, Sue Stolton, Juan Bezaury-Creel, Heather C. Bingham, Tracey L. Cumming, Nigel Dudley, James A. Fitzsimons, Delphine Malleret-King, Kent H. Redford and Pedro Solano Craig Groves, Series Editor Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 29 IUCN WCPA’s BEST PRACTICE PROTECTED AREA GUIDELINES SERIES IUCN-WCPA’s Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines are the world’s authoritative resource for protected area managers. Involving collaboration among specialist practitioners dedicated to supporting better implementation of ideas in the field, the Guidelines distil learning and advice drawn from across IUCN. Applied in the field, they build institutional and individual capacity to manage protected area systems effectively, equitably and sustainably, and to cope with the myriad of challenges faced in practice. The Guidelines also assist national governments, protected area agencies, non-governmental organisations, communities and private sector partners in meeting their commitments and goals, and especially the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Programme of Work on Protected Areas. A full set of guidelines is available at: www.iucn.org/pa_guidelines Complementary resources are available at: www.cbd.int/protected/tools/ Contribute to developing capacity for a Protected Planet at: www.protectedplanet.net/ IUCN PROTECTED AREA DEFINITION, MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES AND GOVERNANCE TYPES IUCN defines a protected area as: A clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values. The definition is expanded by six management categories (one with a sub-division), summarized below.
    [Show full text]
  • Ogasawara Islands Japan
    OGASAWARA ISLANDS JAPAN The Ogasawara Islands are located in the North-Western Pacific Ocean roughly 1,000 km south of the main Japanese Archipelago. The serial property is comprised of five components within an extension of about 400 km from north to south and includes more than 30 islands, clustered within three island groups of the Ogasawara Archipelago: Mukojima, Chichijima and Hahajima, plus an additional three individual islands: Kita-iwoto and Minami-iwoto of the Kazan group and the isolated Nishinoshima Island. These islands rest along the Izu-Ogasawara Arc Trench System. The property totals 7,939 ha comprising a terrestrial area of 6,358 ha and a marine area of 1,581 ha. Today only two of the islands within the property are inhabited, Chichijima and Hahajima. The landscape is dominated by subtropical forest types and sclerophyllous shrublands surrounded by steep cliffs. There are more than 440 species of native vascular plants with exceptionally concentrated rates of endemism as high as 70% in woody plants. The islands are the habitat for more than 100 recorded native land snail species, over 90% of which are endemic to the islands. The islands serve as an outstanding example of the ongoing evolutionary processes in oceanic island ecosystems, as evidenced by the high levels of endemism; speciation through adaptive radiation; evolution of marine species into terrestrial species; and their importance for the scientific study of such processes. COUNTRY Japan NAME Ogasawara Islands NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SERIAL SITE 2011: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under natural criterion (ix). STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE The UNESCO World Heritage Committee issued the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value at the time of inscription: Brief Synthesis The Ogasawara Islands are located in the North-Western Pacific Ocean roughly 1,000 km south of the main Japanese Archipelago.
    [Show full text]