NIS SL 2010.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NIS SL 2010.Pdf NATIO N AL AL IN TEGRITY NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT S Y S TEM TEM SRI LANKA 2010 ASS E SS ME N T No 06, 37th Lane, Queen’s Road, Colombo 03 Tel: 011 436 9781-3 Fax: +94 11 2506419 SRI L A N KA 2010 ISBN: 578-955-1281-44-1 NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT SRI LANKA 2010 www.tisrilanka.org ISBN: 978-955-1281-44-1 © Transparency International Sri Lanka Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of April 2011. Nevertheless, Transparency International Sri Lanka cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM | SRI LANKA 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................. II LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS ................................................................................................. IV CONTRIBUTORS TO THE STUDY .............................................................................................. V ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................................................................................ VI FOREWORD ..................................................................................................................................... X OVERVIEW OF THE PROCESS ................................................................................................. XII I INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 1 - Prof. Arjuna Parakrama II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................... 7 - Prof. Arjuna Parakrama III COUNTRY PROFILE .................................................................. 34 - Prof. Arjuna Parakrama IV CORRUPTION PROFILE ............................................................ 39 - TISL Research Team V ANTI CORRUPTION LAWS AND ACTIVITIES ............................. 45 - TISL Research Team VI THE NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM ........................................ 50 1. THE LEGISLATURE .................................................................................................................. 50 - Dr. Mario Gomez 2. THE EXECUTIVE ....................................................................................................................... 72 - Dr. Mario Gomez 3. THE JUDICIARY ........................................................................................................................ 88 - Dr. Mario Gomez 4. THE PUBLIC SECTOR ........................................................................................................... 105 - TISL Research Team 5. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ..................................................................................... 128 - Ms Bettina Meier 6. THE ELECTION COMMISSION .......................................................................................... 147 - Dr. Mario Gomez 7. OMBUDSMAN / HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ...................................................... 163 - Ms Bettina Meier 8. AUDITOR GENERAL ............................................................................................................ 181 - Dr. Mario Gomez ii Table of Contents 9. ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION ................................................................................ 194 - Ms Gareesha Wirithamulla 10. POLITICAL PARTIES .......................................................................................................... 210 - Ms Bettina Meier 11. THE MEDIA .......................................................................................................................... 223 - Dr. Mario Gomez 12. CIVIL SOCIETY .................................................................................................................... 243 - Prof. Arjuna Parakrama 13. BUSINESS ............................................................................................................................. 261 - TISL Research Team VII CONCLUSION ........................................................................ 281 VIII REFERENCES ......................................................................... 290 iii NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM | SRI LANKA 2010 LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS TABLE 1: SCORING SCALES .................................................................................................. 4 TABLE 2: NIS ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK ...................................................................... 8 TABLE 3: INTEGRITY ACROSS NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS ....................................... 16 TABLE 4: SRI LANKA SCORE IN THE CPI ......................................................................... 40 TABLE 5: SCORES FOR LEGISLATURE ............................................................................. 70 TABLE 6: SCORES FOR EXECUTIVE .................................................................................. 87 TABLE 7: SCORES FOR JUDICIARY ................................................................................ 103 TABLE 8: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY ............... 119 TABLE 9: SCORES FOR PUBLIC-SECTOR ...................................................................... 126 TABLE 10: SCORES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES .................................... 146 TABLE 11: SCORES FOR ELECTION COMMISSION ................................................... 161 TABLE 12: SCORES FOR OMBUDSMAN ...................................................................... 179 TABLE 13: SCORES FOR AUDITOR GENERAL ............................................................ 192 TABLE 14: CONVICTION RATE IN PROSECUTIONS FOR BRIBERY ....................... 207 TABLE 15: SCORES FOR ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION ................................ 208 TABLE 16: SCORES FOR POLITICAL PARTIES ............................................................. 222 TABLE 17: SCORES FOR MEDIA ..................................................................................... 241 TABLE 18: SCORES FOR CIVIL SOCIETY ....................................................................... 259 TABLE 19: SCORES FOR BUSINESS ............................................................................... 278 TABLE 20: SUMMARY OF OVERALL PILLAR SCORES .............................................. 282 CHART 1: OVERVIEW OF PILLAR SCORES ...................................................................... 14 CHART 2: OVERALL PILLAR PERFORMANCE ACROSS DIMENSIONS ................... 15 CHART 3: PSC STATISTICS ON APPEALS AGAINST ITS DECISIONS ................... 117 CHART 4: DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS BY PSC ..................................................... 121 iv Contributors to the Study CONTRIBUTORS TO THE STUDY Editor in Chief: Prof. Arjuna Parakrama TISL Research team: 1. Anjana Bhattarai 2. Nilhan Demel 3. Dr. Dhammika Herath 4. Bettinal Meier 5. Gareesha Wirithamulla (Coordinator) Reviewers 1. Dr. Finn Heinrich, Director Research, Transparency International Secretariat 2. Dr. Suzanne Mulcahy, NIS Coordinator, Transparency International Secretariat Advisory Group 1. Anushya Coomaraswamy, Director, Transparency International Sri Lanka 2. Sanjana Hattotuwa, Senior Researcher, Center for Policy Alternatives 3. Hon. Ameer Ismail, Retired Justice of the Supreme Court and Former Chairman of the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption 4. Chandra Jayaratne, Director, Transparency International Sri Lanka 5. Dr. Sumanasiri Liyanage, Department of Political Science, University of Peradeniya v NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM | SRI LANKA 2010 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AASMB Accounting and Auditing Standards Monitoring Board ACP Anti Corruption Program ADB Asia Development Bank AG Attorney General AG Auditor General ANCL Associated Newspapers of Ceylon Limited ARD Associates in Rural Development BOI Board of Investments CMEV Centre for the Monitoring of Election Violence CPA Centre for Policy Alternatives CWC Ceylon Workers’ Congress CSO Civil Society Organizations CBO Community Based Organizations CHA Consortium of Humanitarian Agencies CIABOC Commission to Investigate Allegation of Bribery or Corruption COI Commissions of Inquiry COPA Committee on Public Accounts COPE Committee on Public Enterprises CPI Corruption Perception Index DIG Deputy Inspector General DG Director General DNA Democratic National Alliance FLICT Facilitating Local Initiatives for Conflict Transformation FOI Freedom of Information FORUM ASIA Asia Forum for Human Rights and Development FMM Free Media Movement GDP Gross Domestic Product GoSL Government of Sri Lanka vi Abbreviations and Acronyms HRC Human Rights Commission IBA International Bar Association IBAHRI International Bar Association Human Rights Initiative ICC International Coordinating Committee ICC-SCA International Coordinating Committee - Sub-Committee on Accreditation ICASL Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka ICJ International Commission of Jurists IDEA International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance IDP Internally Displaced Person IGP Inspector General of Police IFC International Finance Corporation IFI International Financial Institutions IMF International Monetary Fund INGO International Non-governmental Organizations IRED Innovations et Reseaux pour le Developpement ITN Independent Television Network JSC Judicial Service Commission JVP Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna LLRC Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission LTTE Liberation Tigers of Tamil
Recommended publications
  • Sri Lanka 2020 Human Rights Report
    SRI LANKA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sri Lanka is a constitutional, multiparty democratic republic with a freely elected government. Presidential elections were held in 2019, and Gotabaya Rajapaksa won the presidency. He appointed former president Mahinda Rajapaksa, his brother, as prime minister. On August 5, Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa led the Sri Lankan People’s Freedom Alliance and small allied parties to secure a two- thirds supermajority, winning 150 of 225 seats in parliamentary elections. COVID-19 travel restrictions prevented international observers and limited domestic election observation. Domestic observers described the election as peaceful, technically well managed, and safe considering the COVID-19 pandemic but noted that unregulated campaign spending, abuse of state resources, and media bias affected the level playing field. The Sri Lanka Police are responsible for maintaining internal security and are under the Ministry of Public Security, formed on November 20. The military, under the Ministry of Defense, may be called upon to handle specifically delineated domestic security responsibilities, but generally without arrest authority. The nearly 11,000-member paramilitary Special Task Force, a police entity that reports to the inspector general of police, coordinates internal security operations with the military. Civilian officials maintained control over the security forces. Members of the security forces committed some abuses. The Sri Lanka parliament passed the 20th Amendment to the constitution on October 22. Opposition political leaders and civil society groups widely criticized the amendment for its broad expansion of executive authority that activists said would undermine the independence of the judiciary and independent state institutions, such as the Human Rights Commission and the Elections Commission, by granting the president sole authority to make appointments to these bodies with parliament afforded only a consultative role.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016/17 MELSTACORP PLC Annual Report 2016/17
    Annual Report 2016/17 MELSTACORP PLC Annual Report 2016/17 MELSTACORP IS THE CULMINATION OF DECADES OF BUSINESS ACUMEN COMBINED WITH A SHARED VISION OF SUSTAINABLE GROWTH. IN THE LONG TERM, WE ENVISION GROWTH THAT CREATES VALUE FOR ALL. AS A CONGLOMERATE OUR GOALS AND BENCHMARKS ARE HIGH, AND OUR COMMITMENT TO ALL OUR STAKEHOLDERS UNCONDITIONAL. OUR MISSION IS TO ETHICALLY CREATE VALUE WITH SUSTAINABLE GROWTH. Melstacorp PLC became the latest listed conglomerate in the Colombo Stock Exchange on 30th December 2016. During the financial year DCSL PLC ventured into a restructure arrangement under Part ‘X’ of the Companies Act No. 07 of 2007, seeking approval for a share swap that would result in the shareholders of DCSL PLC becoming shareholders of Melstacorp. Consequent to the necessary approval from the Court and with the overwhelming approval of the shareholders the 180 degree share swap was completed during the fourth quarter of 2016. DCSL PLC together with other subsidiaries are now subsidiaries of Melstacorp PLC. The restructure will bring multitude of benefits to the shareholders including unlocking of Group’s value due to DCSL PLC acquiring beverage sector multiples and through the establishment of an umbrella brand that can be extended to subsidiaries. MELSTACORP PLC Annual Report 2016/17 MELSTACORP IS THE CULMINATION OF DECADES OF BUSINESS ACUMEN COMBINED WITH A SHARED VISION OF SUSTAINABLE GROWTH. IN THE LONG TERM, WE ENVISION GROWTH THAT CREATES VALUE FOR ALL. AS A CONGLOMERATE OUR GOALS AND BENCHMARKS ARE HIGH, AND OUR COMMITMENT TO ALL OUR STAKEHOLDERS UNCONDITIONAL. OUR MISSION IS TO ETHICALLY CREATE VALUE WITH SUSTAINABLE GROWTH.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper-English Original
    Mega Cabinets in Sri Lanka (Report No 1) Perceptions and Implications This position paper is published under the ‘Ministerial Expenditure Monitoring’ programme of Transparency International Sri Lanka. It provides an analysis based on the findings of the programme to date on expenditure involved in maintaining a large cabinet in Sri Lanka within the current political and economic context. We acknowledge the team of researchers headed by Ms. Lakmini Seneviratne, (LL.B (Hons) (Colombo), LL.M (Harvard), Attorney-at-Law) consultant for the programme for the invaluable work done in this regard. Transparency International Sri Lanka 28/1, Buller’s Lane, Colombo 7. Tel./Fax : 0112-501474, 0112-592287 E-Mail : [email protected] Web : http://www.tisrilanka.org 1 Introduction Transparency International defines political corruption as “the misuse of political power for private benefit, in particular the benefits of power, status and wealth” 1. According to the definition, it takes two basic forms: corrupt accumulation and extraction and corruption for power preservation and expansion and includes situations where loopholes in national laws and regulations are deliberately side- stepped, ignored and custom-made. Notably, an idea survey conducted among a sample of the Sri Lankan public uncovered some common public perceptions on “ministers” in Sri Lanka, which while being predominantly pessimistic were significantly analogous to the TI definition with the use of terms such as “looter”, “liar, parliament, power, rich”, “crooks”, “big tummy-always shouting doing nothing”, “stupid”, “corruption”, “too many”, “bribery” etc. The Cabinet of Sri Lanka under Executive President Mahinda Rajapakse was sworn in on 23 rd November 2005 with 26 Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard (213-16)
    213 වන කාණ්ඩය - 16 වන කලාපය 2012 ෙදසැම්බර් 08 වන ෙසනසුරාදා ெதாகுதி 213 - இல. 16 2012 சம்பர் 08, சனிக்கிழைம Volume 213 - No. 16 Saturday, 08th December, 2012 පාලෙනත වාද (හැනසා) பாராமன்ற விவாதங்கள் (ஹன்சாட்) PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) ල වාතාව அதிகார அறிக்ைக OFFICIAL REPORT (අෙශෝධිත පිටපත /பிைழ தித்தப்படாத /Uncorrected) අන්තර්ගත පධාන කරුණු නිෙව්දන : විෙශෂේ ෙවෙළඳ භාණ්ඩ බදු පනත : ෙපොදු රාජ මණ්ඩලීය පාර්ලිෙම්න්තු සංගමය, අන්තර් නියමය පාර්ලිෙම්න්තු සංගමය සහ “සාක්” පාර්ලිෙම්න්තු සංගමෙය් ඒකාබද්ධ වාර්ෂික මහා සභා රැස්වීම නිෂපාදන් බදු (විෙශෂේ විධිවිධාන) පනත : ශී ලංකා පජාතාන්තික සමාජවාදී ජනරජෙය් නිෙයෝගය ෙශෂේ ඨාධිකරණෙය්් අග විනිශචයකාර් ධුරෙයන් ගරු (ආචාර්ය) ශිරානි ඒ. බණ්ඩාරනායක මහත්මිය ඉවත් කිරීම සුරාබදු ආඥාපනත : සඳහා අතිගරු ජනාධිපතිවරයා ෙවත පාර්ලිෙම්න්තුෙව් නියමය ෙයෝජනා සම්මතයක් ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම පිණිස ආණ්ඩුකම වවසථාෙව්් 107(2) වවසථාව් පකාර ෙයෝජනාව පිළිබඳ විෙශෂේ කාරක සභාෙව් වාර්තාව ෙර්ගු ආඥාපනත : ෙයෝජනාව පශනවලට් වාචික පිළිතුරු වරාය හා ගුවන් ෙතොටුෙපොළ සංවර්ධන බදු පනත : ශී ලංකාෙව් පථම චන්දිකාව ගුවන්ගත කිරීම: නිෙයෝගය විදුලි සංෙද්ශ හා ෙතොරතුරු තාක්ෂණ අමාතතුමාෙග් පකාශය ශී ලංකා අපනයන සංවර්ධන පනත : විසර්ජන පනත් ෙකටුම්පත, 2013 - [විසිතුන්වන ෙවන් කළ නිෙයෝගය දිනය]: [ශීර්ෂ 102, 237-252, 280, 296, 323, 324 (මුදල් හා කමසම්පාදන);] - කාරක සභාෙව්දී සලකා බලන ලදී.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Report of the Consultative Committees (November – 2014)
    අංක இல 7 (2) No. හවැ පා ෙ ෙ පළවැ සැවාරය උපෙශක කාරක සභා මාක වා තාව (2014 --- ෙන$වැ බ ෙන$වැ බ )))) ஏழாவP பாராfமyறwதிy YதலாவP Buடwெதாட} ஆேலாசைனp Ahpகளிy மாதாxத அறிpைக ((( நவ{ப} மாத{ ––– 2014 ))) First Session of the Seventh Parliament Monthly Report of the Consultative Committees (November – 2014) උපෙශක කාරක සභා මාක වා තාව (2014 ෙන$වැ බ ) අ)මැ*ය ලැ,ම මත මාක වා තාවට ඇළ කරන ලද කාරක සභා කා ය සටහ පහත දැ0ෙ . උපෙශක කාරක සභාෙ නම 1නය 1 ෙ2ය ෛවද4 2014.08.20 2 ජල ස පාදන හා ජලාපවාහන (8ෙශ9ෂ සභාව) 2014.09.23 3 = ක මා ත සංව ධන 2014.09.23 4 ?න@ථාපන හා බ ධනාගාර C*සංස්කරණ 2014.10.09 5 ක ක@ හා ක ක@ සබඳතා 2014.10.10 6 වනGH ස ප සංර0ෂණ 2014.10.10 7 8ෙශ9ෂ ව4ාපෘ* 2014.10.10 8 තා0ෂණ හා ප ෙJෂණ 2014.10.10 9 දK හා Lම ස පාදන 2014.10.21 10 Mවර හා ජලජ ස ප සංව ධන 2014.10.23 11 ජල ස පාදන හා ජලාපවාහන 2014.10.27 12 සංස්කෘ*ක හා කලා 2014.10.28 13 පළා පාලන හා පළා සභා 2014.11.05 14 පPසර හා ?න ජනQය බලශ0* 2014.11.05 15 RS අපනයන ෙභTග Cව ධන 2014.11.05 16 Uඩා 2014.11.05 17 8ෙශ WXයා Cව ධන හා Rභසාධන 2014.11.10 18 ෙසYඛ4 2014.11.13 19 ජා*ක භාෂා හා සමාජ ඒකාබධතා 2014.11.18 20 ස Cදා\ක ක මා ත හා ]ඩා ව4වසාය සංව ධන 2014.11.19 21 ක මා ත හා වා^ජ 2014.11.20 22 ප_ ස ප හා `ාaය Cජා සංව ධන 2014.11.21 23 අධ4ාපන 2014.11.21 (2) උපෙශක කාරක සභා මාක වා තාව (2014 ෙන$වැ බ ) ෙ2ය ෛවද4 කටb cdබඳ උපෙශක කාරක සභාෙ දහසයවැ Wස්Hම --- 2014 අෙගTස් 202020 පැeණ f කාරක සgක ම h ග@ සා ද 1සානායක මහතා (සභාප*) ග@ මi ද අමරHර මහතා ග@ අෙශT0 අෙjංහ මහතා පැeණ f කාරක සgක ෙන$වන ම h ග@ Rස ත ?ංkලෙ මහතා ග@ එ .එK.ඒ.එ .
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka's Potemkin Peace: Democracy Under Fire
    Sri Lanka’s Potemkin Peace: Democracy Under Fire Asia Report N°253 | 13 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Northern Province Elections and the Future of Devolution ............................................ 2 A. Implementing the Thirteenth Amendment? ............................................................. 3 B. Northern Militarisation and Pre-Election Violations ................................................ 4 C. The Challenges of Victory .......................................................................................... 6 1. Internal TNA discontent ...................................................................................... 6 2. Sinhalese fears and charges of separatism ........................................................... 8 3. The TNA’s Tamil nationalist critics ...................................................................... 9 D. The Legal and Constitutional Battleground .............................................................. 12 E. A Short-
    [Show full text]
  • Here a Causal Relationship? Contemporary Economics, 9(1), 45–60
    Bibliography on Corruption and Anticorruption Professor Matthew C. Stephenson Harvard Law School http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/mstephenson/ March 2021 Aaken, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Do individual disclosure rules for parliamentarians improve government effectiveness? Economics of Governance, 12(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-011-0100-8 Aaronson, S. A. (2011a). Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up? Available at SSRN 1922190. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1922190 Aaronson, S. A. (2011b). Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.588 Aaronson, S. A., & Abouharb, M. R. (2014). Corruption, Conflicts of Interest and the WTO. In J.-B. Auby, E. Breen, & T. Perroud (Eds.), Corruption and conflicts of interest: A comparative law approach (pp. 183–197). Edward Elgar PubLtd. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.ebookbatch.GEN_batch:ELGAR01620140507 Abbas Drebee, H., & Azam Abdul-Razak, N. (2020). The Impact of Corruption on Agriculture Sector in Iraq: Econometrics Approach. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 553(1), 12019-. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/553/1/012019 Abbink, K., Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., & Jain, T. (2014). Letting the briber go free: An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 111(Journal Article), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.012 Abbink, Klaus. (2004). Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: An experimental study. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.10.008 Abbink, Klaus.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Delayed, Justice Denied? the Search for Accountability for Alleged Wartime Atrocities Committed in Sri Lanka
    Pace International Law Review Volume 33 Issue 2 Spring 2021 Article 3 May 2021 Justice Delayed, Justice Denied? The Search for Accountability for Alleged Wartime Atrocities Committed in Sri Lanka Aloka Wanigasuriya University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Aloka Wanigasuriya, Justice Delayed, Justice Denied? The Search for Accountability for Alleged Wartime Atrocities Committed in Sri Lanka, 33 Pace Int'l L. Rev. 219 (2021) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr/vol33/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace International Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JUSTICE DELAYED, JUSTICE DENIED? THE SEARCH FOR ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ALLEGED WARTIME ATROCITIES COMMITTED IN SRI LANKA Aloka Wanigasuriya* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .......................................................................... 221 II. National Action ..................................................................... 223 A. National Mechanisms............................................... 223 1. Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL) ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA In the matter of an Application under and in terms of Articles 17 and 126 of the Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka 1. Centre for Policy Alternatives (Guarantee) Ltd., No.24/2 28 th Lane, Off Flower Road, Colombo 7. 2. Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu No. 03, Ascot Avenue, Colombo 5. Petitioners SC (FR) Application No. vs. 1. D. M. Jayaratne, Prime Minister, Prime Minister’s Office, 58, Sir Ernest De Silva Mawatha, Colombo 7 2. Chamal Rajapakse, Speaker of Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka, Sri Jayewardenepura Kotte 3. Ranil Wickremasinghe, Leader of the Opposition, 115, 5 th Lane, Colombo 3 4. A H M Azwer, Member of Parliament, 4, Bhatiya Road, Dehiwala 5. D M Swaminathan, Member of Parliament, 125, Rosmead Place, Colombo 07 6. Mohan Pieris, President’s Counsel, 3/144, Kynsey Road, Colombo 8 7. The Attorney General, Attorney General’s Department, Hulftsdorp, Colombo 12 Respondents 1/19 On this 15th day of January 2013 TO: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THEIR LORDSHIPS THE OTHER HONOURABLE JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA The Petition of the Petitioners above named appearing by Namal Rajapaksha their Registered Attorney-at-Law states as follows: THE PETITIONERS 1. The 1 st Petitioner is a body incorporated under the laws of Sri Lanka (and duly re- registered in terms of the Companies Act No.7 of 2007) and is made up of members, more than three-fourths of whom are citizens of Sri Lanka.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Sri Lankan Presidentialism: Provenance, Problems and Prospects Volume 2
    Reforming Sri Lankan Presidentialism: Provenance, Problems and Prospects Edited by Asanga Welikala Volume 2 18 Failure of Quasi-Gaullist Presidentialism in Sri Lanka Suri Ratnapala Constitutional Choices Sri Lanka’s Constitution combines a presidential system selectively borrowed from the Gaullist Constitution of France with a system of proportional representation in Parliament. The scheme of proportional representation replaced the ‘first past the post’ elections of the independence constitution and of the first republican constitution of 1972. It is strongly favoured by minority parties and several minor parties that owe their very existence to proportional representation. The elective executive presidency, at least initially, enjoyed substantial minority support as the president is directly elected by a national electorate, making it hard for a candidate to win without minority support. (Sri Lanka’s ethnic minorities constitute about 25 per cent of the population.) However, there is a growing national consensus that the quasi-Gaullist experiment has failed. All major political parties have called for its replacement while in opposition although in government, they are invariably seduced to silence by the fruits of office. Assuming that there is political will and ability to change the system, what alternative model should the nation embrace? Constitutions of nations in the modern era tend fall into four categories. 1.! Various forms of authoritarian government. These include absolute monarchies (emirates and sultanates of the Islamic world), personal dictatorships, oligarchies, theocracies (Iran) and single party rule (remaining real or nominal communist states). 2.! Parliamentary government based on the Westminster system with a largely ceremonial constitutional monarch or president. Most Western European countries, India, Japan, Israel and many former British colonies have this model with local variations.
    [Show full text]
  • FCPA & Anti-Bribery
    alertFall 2019 FCPA & Anti-Bribery Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP A New York Limited Liability Partnership • One Battery Park Plaza New York, New York 10004-1482 • +1 (212) 837-6000 Attorney advertising. Readers are advised that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. © 2019 Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP CORRUPTION PERCEPTION SCORE No Data 100 Very Clean 50 0 Very Corrupt Data from Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index 2018. SCORE COUNTRY/TERRITORY RANK 67 Chile 27 52 Grenada 53 41 India 78 35 Armenia 105 29 Honduras 132 23 Uzbekistan 158 88 Denmark 1 66 Seychelles 28 52 Italy 53 41 Kuwait 78 35 Brazil 105 29 Kyrgyzstan 132 22 Zimbabwe 160 87 New Zealand 2 65 Bahamas 29 52 Oman 53 41 Lesotho 78 35 Côte d’Ivoire 105 29 Laos 132 20 Cambodia 161 85 Finland 3 64 Portugal 30 51 Mauritius 56 41 Trinidad 78 35 Egypt 105 29 Myanmar 132 20 Democratic 161 85 Singapore 3 63 Brunei 31 50 Slovakia 57 and Tobago 35 El Salvador 105 29 Paraguay 132 Republic of the Congo 85 Sweden 3 Darussalam 49 Jordan 58 41 Turkey 78 35 Peru 105 28 Guinea 138 20 Haiti 161 85 Switzerland 3 63 Taiwan 31 49 Saudi Arabia 58 40 Argentina 85 35 Timor-Leste 105 28 Iran 138 20 Turkmenistan 161 84 Norway 7 62 Qatar 33 48 Croatia 60 40 Benin 85 35 Zambia 105 28 Lebanon 138 19 Angola 165 82 Netherlands 8 61 Botswana 34 47 Cuba 61 39 China 87 34 Ecuador 114 28 Mexico 138 19 Chad 165 81 Canada 9 61 Israel 34 47 Malaysia 61 39 Serbia 87 34 Ethiopia 114 28 Papua 138 19 Congo 165
    [Show full text]
  • April - June 2015
    Issue No. 147 April - June 2015 National Anthem sung in Tamil The national anthem was sung in Tamil in the presence of President Maithripala Sirisena, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and former President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga at an event, where the lands taken over by the mili- tary to establish a High Security Zone were handed back to the legitimate owners at Valalaai, Valikamam East on 23rr March. Human Rights Review : April - June Institute of Human Rights 2 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Editorial 03 The New government ♦ Extracts from an article by Faizer Shaheid - PTA ALWAYS DISCRIMINAED 06 ♦ Four cheers for judicial independence 07 ♦ Presidential powers and the craving to be slaves 08 ♦ 19th Amendment: Why this indecent haste? 09 ♦ Up to president to act on COPE report: DEW 10 ♦ Arjuna Mahendran's culpability proved! ♦ Sampanthan welcomes 19A 11 ♦ The politics, economics and fundamental rights of grand corruption in Sri Lanka ♦ Sobhitha Thera interviewed by Subashini Gunaratne 12 Situation in the North & East ♦ Return of the denied land 13 ♦ Now the war is over, where do they go? ♦ Northern Spring Programme... 86 villages still powerless 14 ♦ Protest in Mullaitivu against confiscated land ♦ Special Court to hear case: MS 15 ♦ Filling the vacuum Situation in the Hill Country ♦ Koslanda Tragedy turns calamity 16 Media Freedom ♦ Tamil journalists’ woes continue 16 Sri Lanka In the International scene ♦ US PRESSES GOVT....NOTIFY FAMILIES IMMEDIATELY OF LIVING POLITICAL 17 PRISONERS... ♦ TNA wants action on war crimes ♦ Excerpts
    [Show full text]