Profile of Internal Displacement : Myanmar (Burma)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PROFILE OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT : MYANMAR (BURMA) Compilation of the information available in the Global IDP Database of the Norwegian Refugee Council (as of 28 June, 2001) Also available at http://www.idpproject.org Users of this document are welcome to credit the Global IDP Database for the collection of information. The opinions expressed here are those of the sources and are not necessarily shared by the Global IDP Project or NRC Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin Moïse Duboule, 59 1209 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 788 80 85 Fax: + 41 22 788 80 86 E-mail : [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 PROFILE SUMMARY 5 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND OF DISPLACEMENT 7 MAIN CAUSES OF DISPLACEMENT 7 ARMY OFFENSIVES AGAINST ETHNIC OPPOSITION GROUPS HAVE CAUSED MASSIVE DISPLACEMENT OF THE CIVIL POPULATION SINCE THE LATE 1980S (1998-2001) 7 THE ARMY TARGETS CIVILIANS IN ORDER TO CUT SUPPLIES OF FOOD, FUNDS, RECRUITS AND INFORMATION TO ETHNIC RESISTANCE GROUPS (1999-2000) 9 FORCED RELOCATION REMAINS A MAIN CAUSE OF DISPLACEMENT OF THE CIVIL POPULATION AND IS CLOSELY LINKED TO FORCED LABOUR (1998-2000) 11 ILO DOCUMENTS A PERVASIVE USE OF FORCED LABOUR IN 1998 - RECENT INFORMATION INDICATES THAT FORCED LABOUR REMAINS COMMON PRACTICE (1998-2001) 13 PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FORCE PEOPLE TO RELOCATE (1998-1999) 16 SUBSTANTIAL FORCED RELOCATION OF URBAN POPULATIONS DURING THE EARLY 1990S 18 FORCED RELOCATION IN TENASSERIM DIVISION DIRECTLY LINKED TO CONSTRUCTION OF GAS PIPELINES (1991-2000) 19 BACKGROUND FOR DISPLACEMENT IN SPECIFIC STATES OR THE ETHNIC GROUPS 20 INTENSIFICATION OF FORCED RELOCATION IN SHAN STATE DUE TO CONTINUED ARMED STRUGGLE (1996-2000) 20 INCREASED DISPLACEMENT OF KAREN VILLAGERS AFTER ESCALATED FIGHTING BETWEEN ARMY AND OPPOSITION FORCES (1995-1999) 22 REPORTS THAT KAREN PEOPLE CONTINUE TO DISPLACED IN THE NYAUNGLEBIN AND PAPUN DISTRICTS (2000-2001) 24 DECREASED DISPLACEMENT OF THE MON PEOPLE SINCE CEASE FIRE IN 1995 25 SUBSTANTIAL FORCED RELOCATION IN THE KARENNI (KAYAH) STATE (1996-2000) 27 LAND CONFISCATION AND DISPLACEMENT IN THE KACHIN STATE (2000) 29 INCREASED FIGHTING IN NAGALAND DISPLACES THE CIVIL POPULATION (2000-2001) 30 FORCED RELOCATIONS OF MUSLIMS (1997) 31 DISPLACEMENT WITHIN THE ARAKAN (RAKHINE) STATE (2000) 32 INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT IN OTHER STATES AND DIVISIONS OF BURMA (2000) 34 POPULATION PROFILE AND FIGURES 35 NATIONAL TOTAL FIGURES 35 SUGGESTED THAT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED EXCEEDS ONE MILLION - SEVERAL SOURCES ESTIMATE A MINIMUM OF 600,000 IDPS IN BORDER AREAS (1999-2000) 35 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION 36 COMPILATION OF FIGURES ON INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT BY THE BURMA ETHNIC RESEARCH GROUP (BERG) – (2000) 36 OVER 300,000 SHAN VILLAGERS AFFECTED BY RELOCATION PROGRAMME (1996-2000) 36 REPORTS OF MORE THAN 200,000 IDPS IN THE KAREN STATE (1999) 37 OVER 50,000 KARENNI REPORTED INTERNALLY DISPLACED BY 2000 39 PATTERNS OF DISPLACEMENT 41 GENERAL 41 PEOPLE BECOME DISPLACED AS ARMY ORDERS VILLAGES TO MOVE OR THEY FLEE WHEN THE MILITARY FRONT MOVE CLOSE TO THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE (1998) 41 TWO CATEGORIES OF IDPS: THE DISPLACED AND THE DISPERSED (1999) 41 MANY REFUGEES HAVE SURVIVED TWO YEARS OR MORE AS IDPS IN RELOCATION SITES OR HIDING BEFORE ENTERING THAILAND (1998) 42 DISPLACEMENTS IN THE ETHNIC STATES 43 PATTERNS OF DISPLACEMENT IN THE SHAN STATE (1999-2000) 43 PATTERNS OF DISPLACEMENT IN THE KAREN STATE (1999-2001) 45 DISPLACEMENT PATTERNS WITHIN THE KARENNI STATE (1999-2000) 48 PROTECTION CONCERNS 52 PROTECTION NEEDS OF CIVILIANS AFTER BEING DISPLACED 52 REPORTS OF PEOPLE EXPERIENCING HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES AFTER BEING FORCED TO MOVE TO RELOCATION SITES (2000) 52 INADEQUATE PROTECTION BOTH WITHIN AND OUTSIDE KARENNI RELOCATION SITES (2000) 53 IDPS IN HIDING RISK ATTACK BY SPDC SOLDIERS (1999-2000) 54 WOMEN AND CHILDREN TERRORISED BY ARMY SOLDIERS IN EMERGENCY ZONES AND RELOCATION SITES (1999) 56 LACK OF PROTECTION FOR RETURNING REFUGEES 57 CONCERNS RAISED ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION FACING RETURNING ROHINGYAS IN THE RAKHINE (ARAKAN) STATE (1999-2000) 57 MON REFUGEES WHO RETURN FROM THAILAND LACK PROTECTION (1998) 58 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH WARNS AGAINST REPATRIATION OF BURMESE REFUGEES IN THAILAND (2000) 59 SUBSISTENCE NEEDS (HEALTH NUTRITION AND SHELTER) 61 HEALTH 61 NO PUBLIC HEALTH FACILITIES AVAILABLE FOR IDPS FROM THE SHAN STATE (1999) 61 HEALTH SERVICE SYSTEM WITHIN THE KAREN STATE COLLAPSED AFTER FALL OF KNU HEADQUARTERS TO JUNTA FORCES (1998) 62 KARENNI RELOCATION CAMPS ARE CLOSING DOWN - INTERNALLY DISPLACED LIVE A PRECARIOUS EXISTENCE IN THE RAIN FORESTS NEAR THE THAI BORDER (2000) 63 IDPS IN KARENNI/KAYAH RELOCATION SITES EXTREMELY VULNERABLE TO MALNUTRITION AND TREATABLE DISEASES (2000) 63 NUTRITION AND FOOD 64 2 IN THE SHAN STATE, LACK OF FOOD FORCES MANY PEOPLE TO LEAVE THE RELOCATION SITES (1999-2000) 64 KARENNI IDPS IN RELOCATION SITES HAVE INADEQUATE ACCESS TO FOOD (1999-2000) 66 SHELTER 68 DISMAL SHELTER CONDITIONS IN SHAN RELOCATION SITES REPORTED IN 1999 68 MINIMAL PREPARATIONS MADE IN ADVANCE OF THE ARRIVAL OF IDPS IN RELOCATION SITES (1998) 68 ACCESS TO EDUCATION 70 GENERAL 70 LONG-TERM CONFLICT HAS CAUSED GENERATIONS OF GIRLS BEING WITHOUT EDUCATION (2000) 70 DISPLACED CHILDREN HAVE LIMITED ACCESS TO EDUCATION (1998-2000) 71 ISSUES OF SELF-RELIANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 73 LIVELIHOOD OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE DISPLACED 73 FORCED LABOUR UNDERMINES LIVELIHOOD OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE DISPLACED (2000) 73 THE ARMED FORCES ARE SEEN AS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR FOOD SCARCITY AND SUBSEQUENT DISPLACEMENT (1999-2001) 73 LOCAL FARMERS FORCED TO GROW CROPS FOR THE TROOPS (1999-2000) 75 DOCUMENTATION NEEDS AND CITIZENSHIP 78 LEGAL STATUS OF ETHNIC MINORITIES 78 RESTRICTED FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT FOR MINORITY GROUPS (2000) 78 NO REPORTS OF ID CARDS BEING PERMANENTLY CONFISCATED WHEN VILLAGERS WERE RELOCATED IN THE SHAN STATE (1999) 79 ISSUES OF FAMILY UNITY, IDENTITY AND CULTURE 81 GENERAL 81 IDPS IN RELOCATION SITES NOT ALLOWED TO BUILD CHURCHES (1999) 81 MANY COMMUNITIES REMAIN TOGETHER AFTER BEING DISPLACED (1999-2000) 81 PROPERTY ISSUES 83 GENERAL 83 WARFARE IN THE BORDER AREAS IS CLOSELY LINKED TO THE ISSUE OF GAINING CONTROL OVER STRATEGIC RESOURCES (1999-2000) 83 HOUSES BURNED TO OBSTRUCT IDPS RETURNING TO THEIR VILLAGES (1999) 84 GOVERNMENT TROOPS REPORTED TO HAVE APPROPRIATED PROPERTY LEFT BEHIND BY IDPS (1998) 85 WHEN FORCING PEOPLE TO RELOCATE GOVERNMENT IGNORES PROPERTY RIGHTS (1998) 86 3 PATTERNS OF RETURN AND RESETTLEMENT 87 GENERAL 87 REPORTS OF SOME RETURN FROM RELOCATIONS SITES (1998-99) 87 LACK OF SECURITY AND DESTROYED INFRASTRUCTURE DISCOURAGE RETURN (1999) 88 HUMANITARIAN ACCESS 90 GENERAL LIMITATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS TO WORK INSIDE MYANMAR 90 THE GOVERNMENT CONTINUES TO IMPOSE RESTRICTIONS ON ACCESS TO THE INTERNALLY DISPLACED (2000-2001) 90 REPORT SUGGEST THAT SOME LOCAL MILITARY COMMANDERS ALLOW NGO ASSISTANCE TO THE DISPLACED (2000) 91 SOME IDPS REACHED BY BACKPACK HEALTH WORKERS ORGANISED BY LOCAL MEDICAL GROUPS AND ETHNIC ORGANIZATIONS (1999) 91 NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL RESPONSES 93 INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL INITIATIVES 93 THE UN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS DEPLORES THE CONTINUING VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN MYANMAR (APRIL 2001) 93 THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY DEPLORES THE CONTINUED VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN MYANMAR (FROM 81ST PLENARY MEETING 4 DECEMBER 2000) 94 THE ILO CONFERENCE RESOLUTION ON MYANMAR ON 14 JUNE 2000 CAME INTO EFFECT BY THE END OF THE YEAR 94 CALLS FOR A MORE THOROUGH INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE TO THE SITUATION OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT IN BURMA (1999-2000) 96 CALL FOR PROTECTION AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO KARENNI IDPS (MAY 2000) 97 INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES 99 THE INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE TO THE ISSUES OF DISPLACEMENT IN BURMA HAS REMAINED LIMITED AND UNCOORDINATED (2000) 99 ICRC HAS ACCESS TO PLACES OF DETENTION 100 RESPONSE BY NON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS 100 LIMITED ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY NGOS AND INDIVIDUAL GROUPS TO IDPS ACROSS THE BORDER FROM THAILAND (1998-2000) 100 INTERNATIONAL NGOS OPERATING INSIDE MYANMAR FOCUS THEIR WORK ON HEALTH ISSUES (1997) 102 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 105 LIST OF SOURCES USED 106 4 PROFILE SUMMARY Internal displacement is not a new phenomenon in Burma and affects both urban and rural areas (BERG September 2000). Displacement of the civil population accelerated after the army crackdown of the democratic movement in 1988. Conflict induced internal displacement in ethnic minority areas became a major issue during the 1990s when the military rulers intensified their campaign to gain control over ethnic insurgency groups in the border areas which had been effectively semi-autonomous. Today, the army of the ruling "State Peace and Development Council” (SPDC) controls most of the ethnic minority areas, but at a heavy cost: the army has expanded from 175,000 to more than 400,000 soldiers since 1988 (U.S.DOS February 2001). Although several cease-fires have been agreed between insurgency groups and the government, fighting continues in the Shan, Karen (Kayin) and Karenni (Kayah) states and in Naga areas, displacing thousands of civilians. Access to strategic resources in the border states is an important motivation for continued fighting (BERG September 2000). Displacement patterns and protection concerns Independent monitoring or assistance to internally displaced persons has so far not been authorized and it is thus not possible to verify the number of IDPs in Burma. Tens of thousands of villagers in the contested zones remain in forced relocation sites or are internally