DOCSLIB.ORG

Un Humanitarian Situation Room - Colombia Report August 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Un Humanitarian Situation Room - Colombia Report August 2004 UN HUMANITARIAN SITUATION ROOM - COLOMBIA REPORT AUGUST 2004 I. NATIONAL CONTEXT • As a response to the serious humanitarian crisis suffered by the communities along the San Juan River (Chocó), between August 21st and 24th a joint mission was conducted in order to observe the conditions in the area. This zone has been impacted by increased conflict over the past several months. As mission included participation by the Ombudsman’s Chocó Regional Office, the Regional Ombudsman’s Office, DASALUD – Chocó, the SSN Chocó Regional office, the local ombudsman of Istmina, the Mayor’s Office and the local ombudsman of Medio San Juan, along with the Diocese of Istmina-Tadó. There was support and accompaniment offered by representatives from UNHCR, OCHA and CODHES. The mission calculated that due to confrontations, no fewer than 1,376 persons were displaced to the municipal seats of Istmina and Medio San Juan. Also, in addition to the 155 families (640 persons) already registered in SUR by SSN, the mission received information from another 149 families (606 persons) not registered in SUR who were displaced from San Miguel and Salado-Isla de Cruz, to Bebedó, Chambacú, Dipurdú, Paimadó, Puerto Murillo and Las Quebradas. There were an undetermined number of families who still remain behind, living along rivers and in mountainous areas. The mission confirmed that the blockade has been ongoing for more than two months and was put in place by armed groups. The blockade obstructs the free movement of persons and the transport of foodstuffs and traditional products that are normally acquired in Istmina municipality. This situation has impacted local health conditions, food security and education services for all of these communities, with a particularly harsh impact among children, since the blockade also affects food programs for local schools. • On August 6th, before an audience of 180 persons, UNHCR presented the “Balance of Public Policy for Prevention and Attendance of Forced Displacement in Colombia 2002-2004”. This brought together conclusions and recommendations based on an evaluation that included holding 10 “roundtable” discussions on regional topics, along with interviews with 23 experts from State and Civil Society institutions. As part of this evaluation, UNHCR has stated that there has been important progress made, including Government recognition of the existence of a humanitarian crisis in Colombia, an established legal framework, and improvements to emergency assistance provided to persons involved in mass displacements. In addition, UNHCR expressed its concern regarding a lack of emergency assistance for individual displacements, the dismantling of important positive discrimination policies for IDPs, and a government emphasis on returns as the sole long-run solution. • The Consultoría para los Derechos Humanos y el Desplazamiento, CODHES, published in its Bulletin #54, a report on the humanitarian situation along the border. The document highlights the critical situation faced by Colombians fleeing the armed conflict and fumigation operations against illicit crops to Ecuador. CODHES noted that Ecuadorian social organizations have reported the persecution and assassination of Colombians who are members of refugee organizations; many family members have made formal allegations of these events to the Ecuadorian authorities. CODHES also expressed concern regarding what it considers the “invisibility” of the conflict along the border with Panama, as well as the closure of that border, which could lead to negative impacts for the protection of the civilian population attempting to flee the conflict. CODHES has noted an increase in forced displacement along the borders. Throughout 2003, according to SISDHES, a total of 19,378 persons were displaced across the borders, while during the first six months of 2004 a total of 14,079 persons were displaced in border areas. 1 Project funded by: II. ARMED CONFLICT - AFFECTED POPULATION A) Population movements Sucre: SUR registered 251 families. Guajira: Uribia: Return of 520 persons. Chocó: Istmina: Displacement of 150 families.Istmina, Medio San Juan and Cesar: Becerril and Valledupar: At- Sipí: At-risk communities. risk communities. A ntioquia: Ituango: Displacement of 22 families. San Carlos: Displacement of 79 persons. San Carlos, San Francisco and Sons ón: At-risk communities. Casanare: Aguazul, Maní, Monterrey and Tauramena: At- risk communities. Valle del Cauca: Calima – Darién: Displacement of 73 persons. Tuluá: Displacement of 58 families. Return of 96 persons. Arauca: Puerto Rondón and Tame: At-risk communities. R isaralda: Pereira and Quinchía: Displ acement of 17 families to Pereir a, 12 families to Quinchíaand an undetermined number from Caldas to other departments. Cundinamarca: Apulo: At-risk community. Caldas: La Merced: At-risk Nariño: Cumbitara and Policarpo community. Displacement of several families Policarpa: At-risk communities.. Caquetá: Curillo: Displacement of approximately 200 persons. Amazonas: SUR registered 9 families B) Other Impact At-risk communities: San Carlos, San Francisco y Sonsón (Antioquia); Puerto Rondón y Tame (Arauca), La merced (Caldas), Aguazul, Maní, Monterrey and Tauramena (Casanare); Becerril y Valledupar (Cesar); Itsmina, Medio San Juan y Sipí (Chocó), Apulo (Cundinamarca), Policarpo (Nariño). Returns: Uribia (La Guajira), Tuluá (Valle del Cauca). 2 Project funded by: RESPONSE ACTIVITIES NATIONAL LEVEL ICRC with support from Reported that during the weeks July 25 to August 29, offered emergency the Colombian Red Cross assistance to 1,331 IDP families. IOM Began a project for Afro-Colombians to create a sensitization and training strategy for the National Census 2005. WFP Reported 10,825 beneficiaries through “Food for Training” projects. Benefited 39,025 persons through “Food for Work” projects. ANTIOQUIA FAO Providing harvest handling and commercialization training through the project “Strengthening Food Security and Nutrition” to benefit 3,500 families. ARAUCA Tame ICRC Visited communities in Alto Cauca and Puente Tabla, applied vaccines to 252 persons. BOLIVAR Arjona, María PAHO/WHO Provided materials and technical support to the NGO “Terres des Hommes” La baja and to work on healthy housing. Palenque CAQUETA Belén de los IOM Implementing a displacement prevention project through income generation Andaquíes and food security strategies, to benefit 1,181 persons. Finished remodeling of a health post in the inspection Puerto Torres, to ICRC serve 1,000 local inhabitants. Florencia, IOM Developing a Departmental Micro-Credit Fund for Caquetá, to assist IDP and Cartagena del receptor families from strata one and two, to benefit 1,300 persons. Chairá and Morelia CASANARE Maní and Casanare Section Visited these municipalities to monitor local authorities’ commitments and to Villanueva Ombudsman’s Office verify the delivery of emergency humanitarian assistance. CAUCA Mercaderes ICBF and IOM Supporting project “Improving Attention Quality of School Cafeterias in Urban School El Porvenir” to benefit 106 vulnerable children. CÓRDOBA Montería and PAHO/WHO and Red Preparation of Neighborhood Emergency Plans. Montelíbano Cross Córdoba Section PAHO/WHO Supported Secretary of Health in sensitization of Mayors to implement AIEPI strategy. Also successfully lobbied for Cicular DG-005, ordering Mayors to guarantee medical supplies against prevalent childhood diseases. Included “ethnic, disabled and displaced” criteria in Public System for Health Monitoring. Montelíbano PAHO/WHO Completed training on emergency and disaster prevention and assistance in El Porvenir neighborhood, where many IDPs are resident. CUNDINAMARCA Venecia SSN and Colombian Red Began project “Construction of an Organic Biofactory and Construction of Cross Sanitary Units for 10 relocated families in Singapur ranch, Chorrera vereda”. Soacha PAHO/WHO Reopened its field office and re-established contacts with counterparts in the municipality to coordinate activities with IDPs. CHOCÓ UNHCR Held a workshop for 40 representatives of mass displacements between 1996 Quibdó and 1999. This group is still not included in the SUR registry of the SSN. The workshop focused on Guiding Principles of Displacement, Law 387//97 and Constitutional Court decision T-025. IOM and Education Training 200 teachers on the New School methodology, adapting it to the Development Center needs of Afro-Colombians on the Pacific Coast. 3 Project funded by: MAGDALENA Cerro Azul, La ICRC Provided accompaniment to personnel of Hospital de Aracataca for Fuente and vaccination activities. A total of 205 vaccinated. Río Piedra NARIÑO Barbacoas, UNHCR, Community Visited these municipalities to follow-up on a June mission. The mission Maguí Payán, Ombudsman of the Pacific noted several protection deficiencies and a lack of humanitarian assistance Olaya Herrera Coast and Pastoral Social for IDPs, and returned and at-risk persons. and Roberto Tumaco Payán Pasto PAHO/WHO Offering technical support to begin activities for the Health Emergency Operations Center. The emergency health worker network in municipalities around Galeras volcano trained in management of humanitarian supplies. Tumaco IOM Implementing a basic sanitation project through a dry septic tank system for 200 families. NORTE DE SANTANDER Cúcuta IOM Implementing a project to construct 123 basic housing units for an equal number of families. Teorama IOM Building a sewage system to treat and collect waste water in the area, includes construction of 78 sanitary units
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Resolución No. 5024 Chocó
    cNs Comalia riSCIOrtal Electoral COLOMBIA RESOLUCIÓN No. 5024 DE 2019 (18 de septiembre) Por medio del cual se adoptan decisiones en relación con la inscripción irregular de cédulas de ciudadanía, en los Municipios de Alto Baudo, Atrato, Bagado, Bojaya, El Cantón de San Pablo, Carmen del Darién, Certeguí, Condoto, El Carmen de Atrato, El Litoral del San Juan, lstmina, Juradó, Lloró, Medio Baudó, Medio San Juan, Nóvita, Nuqui, Río !ro, Río Quito, Riosucio, Sipl, Tadó y Unión Panamericana, Departamento del Chocó, para las elecciones de autoridades locales de 27 de octubre del año 2019. EL CONSEJO NACIONAL ELECTORAL En ejercicio de sus atribuciones Constitucionales y legales, en especial las conferidas en los artículos 265 numeral 6° y 316 de la Constitución Política, 4° de la ley 163 de 1994, la Resolución No. 2857 de 2018 del Consejo Nacional Electoral y con fundamento en los siguientes: 1. HECHOS Y ACTUACIONES ADMINISTRATIVAS 1.1. El 27 de octubre de 2019 se realizarán en todo el país las elecciones para elegir Autoridades Locales (Gobernadores, Alcaldes, Diputados, Concejales y Miembros de Juntas Administradoras Locales). 1.2. En reparto especial del 14 de noviembre de 2018, correspondió al Despacho del Magistrado Jorge Enrique Rozo Rodríguez, conocer de las investigaciones, por presuntas irregularidades en la inscripción de cédulas de ciudadanía, en los municipios del Departamento de Chocó. 1.3. Mediante los siguientes Autos el Consejo Nacional Electoral, a través del Magistrado Jorge Enrique Rozo Rodriguez, asumió el conocimiento y ordenó iniciar el procedimiento administrativo para determinar la posible inscripción irregular de algunas cédulas de ciudadania en los Municipios de Alto Baudo, Atrato, Bagadó, Bojaya, El Cantón del San Pablo, Carmen del Darién, Cértegui, Condoto, El Carmen de Atrato, El Litoral del San Juan, Istmina, Juradó, Lloró, Medio Baudó, Medio San Juan, Nóvita, Nuquí, Río Iro, Río Quito, Riosucio, Sipí, Tadó y Unión Panamericana, Departamento del Chocó.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentación De Powerpoint
    INFORME DE INCENDIOS FORESTALES 01DE ENERO – 15 ABRIL DE 2018 DNBC Elaboro: Sala Situacional. MUNICIPIOS UNIDADES NUMERO DEPARTAMENTO MUNICIPIOS EVENTOS AFECTADOS BOMBERILES MAQUINAS AMAGÁ, AMALFI, BELLO, CAREPA, CAUCASIA, CONCORDIA, COPACABANA, EL BAGRE, ENTRERRIOS, ENVIGADO, GIRARDOTA, HELICONIA, ITAGUI, JERICÓ, LA ESTRELLA, MARINILLA, MEDELLÍN, OLAYA, ANTIOQUIA 131 32 958 203 PUERTO NARE, PUERTO TRIUNFO, REMEDIOS, SALGAR, SAN JERÓNIMO, SAN PEDRO DE URABA, SANTA BÁRBARA, SANTA ROSA DE OSOS, SEGOVIA ,SOPETRÁN, TURBO, URRAO ,YOLOMBÓ Y ZARAGOZA. ARAUCA ARAUQUITA Y TAME 15 02 86 19 CANDELARIA, GALAPA, JUAN DE ACOSTA, MALAMBO, SABANALARGA, 31 07 241 44 ATLANTICO SUAN Y TUBARA. BOGOTÁ D.C. BOGOTÁ D.C. 01 01 20 04 ARJONA, CALAMAR, CLEMENCIA,CORDOBA, EL CARMEN DE BOLIVAR, BOLIVAR MAGANGUÉ, MAHATES, MOMPOS, SAN JUAN DE NEPOMUCENO, SANTA 84 13 412 94 ROSA DEL SUR, SIMITÍ , TURBACO Y TURBANÁ. ALMEIDA, AQUITANIA, BELÉN, BOYACÁ, BUENAVISTA, BUSBANZÁ, CHINAVITA, CHIQUIZA, CHITARAQUE, CHIVATÁ, CIÉNEGA, COMBITA, CUÍTIVA, DUITAMA, FIRAVITOBA, FLORESTA, GAMEZA, GUATEQUE, JENESANO, LABRANZAGRANDE, MACANAL, MONIQUIRÁ, NOBSA, NUEVO BOYACA 130 46 861 202 COLÓN, OICATÁ, PAIPA, PAUNA, PESCA, PUERTO BOYACÁ, RAMIRIQUÍ, SAN PABLO DE BORBUR, SANTA ROSA DE VITERBO, SIACHOQUE, SOATÁ, SOGAMOSO, SOMONDOCO, SORACÁ, SOTAQUIRÁ, SUTATENZA, TIBASOSA, TOPAGA, TUNJA, TURMEQUÉ, TUTA Y VILLA DE LEYVA. CALDAS ANSERMA, LA DORADA, VICTORIA Y VITERBO. 13 04 48 14 CAQUETA BELÉN DE LOS ANDAQUÍES , FLORENCIA Y SAN VICENTE DEL GAGUAN. 26 03 170 36 AGUAZUL, MANÍ, NUNCHÍA, OROCUÉ, PAZ DE ARIPORO, PORE, CASANARE SABANALARGA, SAN LUIS DE PALENQUE, TÁMARA, TAURAMENA, 205 13 1.309 304 TRINIDAD, VILLANUEVA Y YOPAL. CAUCA MIRANDA Y POPAYAN. 03 12 12 03 AGUACHICA, BECERRIL, CURUMANI, EL COPEY, EL PASO, LA JAGUA DE CESAR 94 11 647 130 IBIRICO, LA PAZ, PELAYA, RIO DE ORO, SAN ALBERTO Y VALLEDUPAR.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Operativo Anual (POA)
    PLAN DE INVERSIONES “TODOS POR EL PACÍFICO - CHOCÓ” PLAN OPERATIVO ANUAL POA 2015 Empresa de Acueducto y Alcantarillado de Pereira S.A. E.S.P Pereira, 28 de agosto de 2015 “TODOS POR EL PACÍFICO -CHOCÓ” PLAN OPERATIVO ANUAL POA 2015 CONTRATO INTERADMINISTRATIVO No. 186 de 2010 Pereira, 28 de agosto de 2015 Tabla de contenido 1 BREVE DIAGNÓSTICO DEL ACCESO A AGUA Y SANEAMIENTO: .................................................. 6 2 JUSTIFICACION DE LAS VARIACIONES DEL POA 4 RESPECTO AL POG APROBADO. .................. 58 3 COORDINACION DE OBRAS DEL PROGRAMA CON LAS OBRAS DE RECURSOS EXTERNOS. ..... 58 4 ESTRATEGIA PARA EL SISTEMA DE SEGUIMIENTO DE LA CALIDAD DE AGUA........................... 58 5 ACTIVIDADES QUE FINALIZAN POSTERIOR AL CONTRATO 186 DE 2010 .................................. 59 6 EXPLICACION DE ALGUNOS DE LOS PRODUCTOS MENCIONADOS EN EL POA. ........................ 61 7 COORDINACION INTERINSTITUCIONAL SEDE QUIBDO ............................................................. 61 8 MATRIZ DE RESULTADOS........................................................................................................... 61 9 PLAN DE ADQUISICIONES .......................................................................................................... 61 10 CRONOGRAMA ...................................................................................................................... 61 11 ESTADO DE LOS PRODUCTOS A DICIEMBRE 31 DE 2014 ...................................................... 62 12 LIMITANTES DE LA EJECUCIÓN DEL POA 2015
    [Show full text]
  • Lista De Promotores Integrales De Salud
    Lista de Promotores Integrales de Salud Para mayor facilidad, consulta nuestra base de Promotores Integrales de Salud en los municipios donde NUEVA EPS está presente con el Régimen Subsidiado. CIUDAD DEPARTAMENTO TELÉFONO Leticia Amazonas 3214481109 Leticia Amazonas 3223447297 Leticia Amazonas 3102877920 Puerto Nariño Amazonas 3223447296 Puerto Nariño Amazonas 3102868210 Arauca Arauca 3222394658 Arauca Arauca 3223450970 Arauquita Arauca 3223450973 Arauquita Arauca 3108652358 Fortul Arauca 3223450974 Saravena Arauca 3223450972 Tame Arauca 3223450971 Baranoa Atlántico 3223472172 Baranoa Atlántico 3203334995 Barranquilla Atlántico 3223470907 Barranquilla Atlántico 3223470907 Barranquilla Atlántico 3108700490 Barranquilla Atlántico 3223446005 Campo de La Cruz Atlántico 3214486403 Candelaria Atlántico 3223008190 Galapa Atlántico 3223480872 Juan de Acosta Atlántico 3223444795 Luruaco Atlántico 3223444786 Malambo Atlántico 3223444785 Malambo Atlántico 3223008008 Malambo Atlántico 3223444785 Manatí Atlántico 3108736088 Palmar de Varela Atlántico 3223008063 Piojo Atlántico 3223445994 Polonuevo Atlántico 3223444784 Polonuevo Atlántico 3223444784 Ponedera Atlántico 3223512169 Puerto Colombia Atlántico 3223445986 Repelón Atlántico 3223510907 Sabanagrande Atlántico 3223445989 Sabanalarga Atlántico 3203334995 Santa Lucía Atlántico 3214489514 Santo Tomás Atlántico 3223009214 Soledad Atlántico 3223009192 Soledad Atlántico 3223008994 Soledad Atlántico 3222486406 Soledad Atlántico 3222486413 Soledad Atlántico 3223484785 Soledad Atlántico 3223444784 Suan
    [Show full text]
  • Diapositiva 1
    Communitarian State: Development for All, and its Application to the Pacific National Planning Department June 3rd, 2007 Index 1.1. WWhhaatt isis mmeaeanntt byby ththee PPaacciifificc RRegegiioon?n? 2.2. WWhhyy hhaaveve aa ppoolilicycy foforr ththee PPaciacifificc?? 3.3. HHowow iiss ththee ppoolilicycy fforor ththee PPaacifcificic ddeeveveloloppeed?d? 4.4. WWhhaatt dodoeess ththee ssttrraateteggyy conconsisistst oof?f? • AA vivisisioonn comcombibinedned wiwithth stratstrategiegicc oobjbjectiectivveses • AA rolrolee forfor thethe PaciPacifificc wiwithithinn thethe NNatiationonalal DeDevelvelopopmentment PPllanan − DemocDemocratiraticc popolliicycy wwithith ssociociaallllyy iintegntegratedrated assassiistastancence − PovPovertyerty rereductductiionon aandnd propromotingmoting ofof equaequalliityty − StrongStrong andand sussustaitainanablblee devedevellopmeopmentnt − EnvEnviironmeronmentalntal manamanagemegementnt whiwhicchh fosfostersters devdevelelopopmentment − SpecSpeciialal aspeaspectscts ofof dedevelveloopmenpmentt • StrenStrengtheninggthening ofof succsuccessfulessful casescases Index • WWhhaatt isis mmeaeanntt byby ththee PPaacciifificc RRegegiioon?n? • Why have a policy for the Pacific? • How is the policy for the Pacific developed? • What does the strategy consist of? • A vision combined with strategic objectives • A role for the Pacific within the National Development Plan − Democratic policy with socially integrated assistance − Poverty reduction and promoting of equality − Strong and sustainable development − Environmental management
    [Show full text]
  • Colombia Baseline Study
    RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS CONDUCT DUE DILIGENCE IN COLOMBIA’s golD SUPPLY CHAIN GOLD MINING IN CHOCÓ About the OECD The OECD is a forum in which governments compare and exchange policy experiences, identify good practices in light of emerging challenges, and promote decisions and recommendations to produce better policies for better lives. The OECD’s mission is to promote policies that improve economic and social well-being of people around the world. About the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Minerals The OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD Due Diligence Guidance) provides detailed recommendations to help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their mineral purchasing decisions and practices. The OECD Due Diligence Guidance is for use by any company potentially sourcing minerals or metals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. About this study This report is the third of a series of assessments on Colombian gold supply chains and the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High- Risk Areas in the Colombian context. It analyses conditions of mineral extraction and related risks in Colombia’s Choco region. This report was prepared by Frédéric Massé and Jeremy McDermott, working as consultants for the OECD Secretariat. Find out more about OECD work on the minerals sector: mneguidelines.oecd.org/mining.htm Cofunded by the European Union © OECD 2017. This document is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Bogotá D.C., 19 De Julio De 2019 Doctora Nancy Patricia Gutierrez
    Bogotá D.C., 19 de julio de 2019 Doctora Nancy Patricia Gutierrez Ministra del Interior Secretaría Técnica de la Comisión Intersectorial para la Respuesta rápida a las Alertas Tempranas (CIPRAT) Carrera 8 No. 12 B – 31 Bogotá D.C. Referencia: ALERTA TEMPRANA N°031-19, de INMINENCIA, debido al elevado riesgo que afrontan las poblaciones afrocolombianas e indígenas de Chambacú, San Agustín, Buenas Brisas, Cañaveral, Teatino, Loma Chupey, Marqueza, Santa Rosa, Tanandó, Sipí cabecera municipal, Barraconcito, Barrancón, Charco Largo la Unión, Charco Hondo del Consejo Comunitario General del San Juan - ACADESAN y el Resguardo indígena de Sanadoncito en el municipio de Sipí y de Cajón, Santa Barbará, Torra de (ACADESAN), El Tigre, Juntas del Tamaná, Irabubú, Sesego, Curundó, Santa María de Urubará, Nóvita Cabecera municipal, los consejos locales que integran el Consejo Comunitario Mayor de Nóvita - COCOMAN, y el Resguardo indígena de Sabaletera San Onofre el Tigre, en el municipio de Nóvita (Chocó). Respetada Ministra del Interior: De manera atenta, y de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el Decreto 2124 de 20171, me permito remitir a su Despacho la presente Alerta Temprana de Inminencia debido al elevado riesgo que afrontan las poblaciones afrocolombianas e indígenas de San Agustín, Buenas Brisas, Cañaveral, Teatino, Loma Chupey, Marqueza, Santa Rosa, Tanandó, Sipí cabecera municipal, Barraconcito, Barrancón, Charco Largo la Unión, Charco Hondo y el Resguardo de Sanadoncito en Sipí y de Cajón, El Tigre, Juntas del Tamaná, Irabubú, Curundó, Santa María de Urubará, Nóvita Cabecera municipal, los consejos locales que integran el Consejo Comunitario Mayor de Nóvita - COCOMAN, y el Resguardo indígena de Sabaletera San Onofre el Tigre, en el municipio de Nóvita (Chocó).
    [Show full text]
  • Perfiles Proyectos Snsm
    Minas Contenido Minas, puertos y vías férreas ......................................................................................................... 5 Minas ............................................................................................................................................. 8 1. Departamento de La Guajira ......................................................................................... 9 1.1. Complejo Carbonífero del Cerrejón.......................................................................... 9 2. Departamento del Cesar ................................................................................................... 12 2.1. La Loma - Pribbenow ........................................................................................... 12 2.2. Mina El Descanso .................................................................................................. 13 2.3. Mina Cerrolargo - Sororia.................................................................................... 14 2.4. Minas La Divisa en complejo carbonífero Cerro Largo .................................... 15 2.5. Mina Sinclinal de La Jagua – La Victoria – El Tesoro - Hierbabuena ............ 16 2.6. Mina Calenturitas ................................................................................................. 17 2.7. Mina La Francia .................................................................................................... 18 2.8. Mina El Haltillo ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Codificación De Municipios Por Departamento
    Código Código Municipio Departamento Departamento Municipio 05 001 MEDELLIN Antioquia 05 002 ABEJORRAL Antioquia 05 004 ABRIAQUI Antioquia 05 021 ALEJANDRIA Antioquia 05 030 AMAGA Antioquia 05 031 AMALFI Antioquia 05 034 ANDES Antioquia 05 036 ANGELOPOLIS Antioquia 05 038 ANGOSTURA Antioquia 05 040 ANORI Antioquia 05 042 ANTIOQUIA Antioquia 05 044 ANZA Antioquia 05 045 APARTADO Antioquia 05 051 ARBOLETES Antioquia 05 055 ARGELIA Antioquia 05 059 ARMENIA Antioquia 05 079 BARBOSA Antioquia 05 086 BELMIRA Antioquia 05 088 BELLO Antioquia 05 091 BETANIA Antioquia 05 093 BETULIA Antioquia 05 101 BOLIVAR Antioquia 05 107 BRICEÑO Antioquia 05 113 BURITICA Antioquia 05 120 CACERES Antioquia 05 125 CAICEDO Antioquia 05 129 CALDAS Antioquia 05 134 CAMPAMENTO Antioquia 05 138 CAÑASGORDAS Antioquia 05 142 CARACOLI Antioquia 05 145 CARAMANTA Antioquia 05 147 CAREPA Antioquia 05 148 CARMEN DE VIBORAL Antioquia 05 150 CAROLINA Antioquia 05 154 CAUCASIA Antioquia 05 172 CHIGORODO Antioquia 05 190 CISNEROS Antioquia 05 197 COCORNA Antioquia 05 206 CONCEPCION Antioquia 05 209 CONCORDIA Antioquia 05 212 COPACABANA Antioquia 05 234 DABEIBA Antioquia 05 237 DON MATIAS Antioquia 05 240 EBEJICO Antioquia 05 250 EL BAGRE Antioquia 05 264 ENTRERRIOS Antioquia 05 266 ENVIGADO Antioquia 05 282 FREDONIA Antioquia 05 284 FRONTINO Antioquia 05 306 GIRALDO Antioquia 05 308 GIRARDOTA Antioquia 05 310 GOMEZ PLATA Antioquia 05 313 GRANADA Antioquia 05 315 GUADALUPE Antioquia 05 318 GUARNE Antioquia 05 321 GUATAPE Antioquia 05 347 HELICONIA Antioquia 05 353 HISPANIA Antioquia
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Índice De Focalización De Vivienda Rural
    ÍNDICE DE FOCALIZACIÓN DE VIVIENDA RURAL (IFVR) El índice asigna un valor numérico continuo (entre cero y 1), calculado para los 1122 municipios y áreas no municipalizadas (ANM) del país. Se construyó a partir de tres dimensiones: 1) socioeconómica; 2) poblacional; 3) productiva. Aquellos territorios con mayor puntaje se ubican en la parte más alta del escalafón y se señalan en color rojo, representando mayores carencias y necesidades de atención. Los municipios que ocupan las posiciones bajas tienen menor prioridad para la Política y se señalan en color verde. El IFVR se calculó de manera independiente para cada tipo de déficit habitacional: IFVR cualitativo para mejoramiento de vivienda, y IFVR cuantitativo para vivienda nueva. La información estadística proviene de Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda (DANE, 2018), Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi (IGAC, 2014); Unidad para la Atención y Reparación de Víctimas (UARIV, 2019). Distribución del índice IFVR cuantitativo por municipio Vivienda nueva Mejoramiento Divipola Departamento Municipio IFVR IFVR Semáforo Semáforo Cuantitativo Cualitativo 91540 AMAZONAS PUERTO NARIÑO 0,65 1. Rojo 0,51 2. Verde 91001 AMAZONAS LETICIA 0,52 2. Verde 0,37 2. Verde 91407 AMAZONAS LA PEDRERA 0,69 1. Rojo 0,54 1. Rojo 91405 AMAZONAS LA CHORRERA 0,65 1. Rojo 0,51 2. Verde 91669 AMAZONAS SANTANDER (Araracuara) 0,66 1. Rojo 0,5 2. Verde 91460 AMAZONAS MIRITÍ-PARANÁ 0,67 1. Rojo 0,51 2. Verde (Campoamor) 91430 AMAZONAS LA VICTORIA (Pacoa) 0,69 1. Rojo 0,54 1. Rojo 91798 AMAZONAS TARAPACÁ 0,65 1. Rojo 0,5 2. Verde 91263 AMAZONAS EL ENCANTO 0,66 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Buying Coal from Colombia
    Buying Coal from Colombia » Taking stock of 6 years of engagement 2012–2018 2 Buying Coal from Colombia › Acknowledgement › Contents Acknowledgement The preparation of this report was coordinated on the part of twentyfifty by Luke Wilde, Emily Richards and Sulema Pioli and on the part of EnBW by Lothar Rieth, Dirk Keller and Karin Kolbe. Furthermore, we would especially like to thank Simone Droll, Katharina Klein, Bruno Luycx, Reinhold Repple and Stefan Webers (from EnBW), Guy Wilson In addition, we would like to thank the people working (from twentyfifty) for the entire preparation and com- for the companies Drummond and Prodeco and for pilation process and without whom the completion their detailed feedback on earlier draft versions. They of this study would not have been possible. The same supported the research on-site and gave recommen- applies to the help of CREER, where Viviana Arango, dations for dialogue partners in Colombia. Camila Miranda and Luis Fernando de Angulo provided us with their extensive expertise and active The authors of this study would also like to express support in particular during the on-site research. their appreciation to all interviewees (governmental, non-governmental), especially in Colombia – in Cesar as well as in Bogotá – for their willingness to take part in discussions and thus support the realisation of this study. For this study, information up to spring 2019 was researched, reviewed and discussed. The study was published at the end of July 2019. 3 Contents Preface I (by EnBW) .......................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Por Medio De La Cual Se Asigna Al IGAC, Como Gestor Catastral Por
    RESOLUCIÓN 45 DEL 20 DE ENERO DE 2021 “Por medio de la cual se asigna al IGAC, como gestor catastral por excepción, el prefijo y las series del Código Homologado de Identificación Predial (CH) en los municipios a su cargo para los predios registrados en el Sistema Nacional Catastral – SNC.” LA DIRECTORA GENERAL DEL INSTITUTO GEOGRÁFICO AGUSTÍN CODAZZI En uso de las facultades que le confieren el numeral 7 del artículo 14 del Decreto 2113 de 1992, el numeral 1 del artículo 6 del Decreto 208 de 2004, y C O N S I D E R A N D O: Que de acuerdo con el CONPES 3958 de 2019, la interrelación del catastro con el registro se ha identificado como una necesidad recurrente que busca facilitar el intercambio, unificación, mantenimiento y acceso a la información, tanto catastral como registral, por parte de los actores del proceso. Que el artículo 79 de la Ley 1955 del 25 de mayo de 2019, establece que, la gestión catastral es un servicio público entendido como un conjunto de operaciones técnicas y administrativas orientadas a la adecuada formación, actualización, conservación y difusión de la información catastral, así como los procedimientos del enfoque catastral multipropósito que sean adoptados y, adicionalmente, señala el marco general de su desarrollo. Que el artículo 79 de la Ley 1955 del 25 de mayo de 2019, establece que, el Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi (IGAC) será la máxima autoridad catastral nacional y prestador por excepción del servicio público de catastro, en ausencia de gestores catastrales habilitados. Que el artículo 2.2.2.1.1.
    [Show full text]