DOCSLIB.ORG

John-Juxon, William

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
John-Juxon, William THE AGES DIGITAL LIBRARY REFERENCE CYCLOPEDIA of BIBLICAL, THEOLOGICAL and ECCLESIASTICAL LITERATURE John - Juxon, William by James Strong & John McClintock To the Students of the Words, Works and Ways of God: Welcome to the AGES Digital Library. We trust your experience with this and other volumes in the Library fulfills our motto and vision which is our commitment to you: MAKING THE WORDS OF THE WISE AVAILABLE TO ALL — INEXPENSIVELY. AGES Software Rio, WI USA Version 1.0 © 2000 2 John (Ijwa>nnh, the Greek form of Jehohanan; comp. Josephus, Ant. 8, 15, 2), a common name among the Jews after the captivity. I. In the Apocrypha the following occur under this rendering in the A.V.: 1. The father of Matathias, of the Maccabean family (1 Macc. 2:1). SEE MACCABEES. 2. The son of Accos, and father of Eupolemus, which latter was one of the envoys sent by Judas Maccabaeus to Rome (1 Macc. 8:17; 2 Macc. 4:11). 3. Surnamed Caddis (q.v.), the eldest son of the same Matathias, and one of the Maccabean brothers (1 Macc. 2:2, Johanan; less correctly Joseph in 2 Macc. 8:22). He had been sent by his brother Jonathan on a message to the Nabathaeans, when he was taken prisoner by “the children of Jambri” (q.v.), from Medeba, and appears to have been put to death by them (1 Macc. 9:35, 36, 38) 4. One of the persons sent by the Jews with a petition to the Syrian general Lysias (2 Macc. 11:17). 5. The son of Simon Maccabaeus (1 Macc. 13:53; 16:1, 2, 9, 19, 21, 23), better known by the epithet HYRCANUS SEE HYRCANUS (q.v.). II. In the New Testament the following are all that are mentioned, besides JOHN THE APOSTLE and JOHN THE BAPTIST, who are noticed separately below: 1. One of the high priest’s family, who, with Annas and Caiaphas, sat in judgment upon the apostles Peter and John for their cure of the lame man and preaching in the Temple (<440406>Acts 4:6), A.D. 29. Lightfoot identifies him with R. Johanan Ben-Zachai, who lived forty years before the destruction of the Temple, and was president of the great synagogue after its removal to Jabne, or Jamnia (Lightfoot, Cent. Chor. Matth. praef. ch. 15; see also Selden, De Synedriis, 2, ch. 15). Grotius merely says he was known to Rabbinical writers as “John the priest” (Comm. in Act. 4). — Smith. 2. The Hebrew name of the evangelist MARK SEE MARK (q.v.), who throughout the narrative of the Acts is designated by the name by which he was known among his countrymen (<441212>Acts 12:12, 25; 13:5, 13; 15:37). 3 III. In Josephus the following are the most noteworthy of this name, besides the above and JOHN OF GISCHALA, whom we notice separately below: 1. A high priest (son of Judas, and grandson of Eliashib), who slew his brother Jesus in the Temple, thereby provoking the vengeance of Bagoses, the Persian viceroy under Artaxerxes (Ant. 11, 7, 1). He corresponds to the Jonathan (q.v.), son of Joiada, of <161210>Nehemiah 12:10, 11. SEE HIGH PRIEST. 2. Son of Dorcas, sent by the Sicarii with ten executioners to murder the persons taken into custody by John of Gischala on his arrival in Jerusalem (Josephus, War, 4, 3, 5). 3. Son of Sosas, one of the four popular generals of the Idumaeans who marched to Jerusalem in aid of the zealots at the instance of John of Gischala (Josephus. War, 4, 4, 2). He was possibly the same with John the Essene, spoken of as commander of the toparchy of Shamma at an earlier stage of the war (ib. 2, 20, 4; comp. 3, 2, 1). He was mortally wounded by a dart during the final siege (ib. 5, 6, 5). John the Apostle (Ijwa>nnhv) the Apostle, and brother of the apostle James “the greater” (<400421>Matthew 4:21; 10:2; <410119>Mark 1:19; 3:17; 10:35; <420510>Luke 5:10; 8:3; etc.). I. Personal History. — 1. Early Life. — It is probable that he was born at Bethsaida, on the Lake of Galilee. The general impression left on us by the Gospel narrative is that he was younger than the brother whose name commonly precedes his (<400421>Matthew 4:21; 10:3; 17:1, etc.; but compare <420928>Luke 9:28, where the order is inverted in most codices), younger than his friend Peter, possibly also than his Master. The life which was protracted to the time of Trajan (Eusebius, H.E. 3, 23, following Irenaeus) can hardly have begun before the year B.C. 4 of the Dionysian era. The Gospels give us the name of his father Zebedaeus (<400421>Matthew 4:21) and his mother Salome (comp. <402756>Matthew 27:56 with <411540>Mark 15:40; 16:1). Of the former we know nothing more. SEE ZEBEDEE. The traditions of the fourth century (Epiphan. 3, Hoer. 78) make the latter the daughter of Joseph by his first 4 wife, and consequently half sister to our Lord. By some recent critics she has been identified with the sister of Mary, the mother of Jesus, in <431925>John 19:25 (Wieseler, in Stud. u. Krit. 1840, p. 648). Ewald (Gesch. Israels, v. 171) adopts Wieseler’s conjecture, and connects it with his own hypothesis, that the sons of Zebedee, and our Lord, as well as the Baptist, were of the tribe of Levi. On the other hand, more sober critics, like Neander (Pflanz. u. Leit. p. 609 [4th ed.]) and Lücke (Johannes, 1, 9), reject both the tradition and the conjecture. SEE SALOME. They lived, it may be inferred from <430144>John 1:44, in or near the same town as those who were afterwards the companions and partners of their children. SEE BETHSAIDA. There, on the shores of the Sea of Galilee, the apostle and his brother grew up. The mention of the “hired servants” (<410120>Mark 1:20), of his mother’s “substance” (ajpo< tw~n uJparco>ntwn, <420803>Luke 8:3), of “his own house” (ta< i]dia, <431927>John 19:27), implies a position removed by at least some steps from absolute poverty. The fact that the apostle was known to the high priest Caiaphas, as that knowledge was hardly likely to have begun after he had avowed himself the disciple of Jesus of Nazareth, suggests the probability of some early intimacy between the two men or their families. The name which the parents gave to their younger child was too common to serve as the ground of any special inference; but it deserves notice (1) that the name appears among the kindred of Caiaphas (<440406>Acts 4:6); (2) that it was given to a priestly child, the son of Zacharias (<420113>Luke 1:13), as the embodiment and symbol of Messianic hopes. The frequent occurrence of the name at this period, unconnected as it was with any of the great deeds of the old heroic days of Israel, is indeed in itself significant as a sign of that yearning and expectation which then characterized not only the more faithful and devout (<420225>Luke 2:25, 38), but the whole people. The prominence given to it by the wonders connected with the birth of the future Baptist may have imparted a meaning to it for the parents of the future evangelist which it would not otherwise have had. Of the character of Zebedeus we have hardly the slightest trace. He interposes no refusal when his sons are called on to leave him (<400421>Matthew 4:21). After this he disappears from the scene of the Gospel history, and we are led to infer that he had died before his wife followed her children in their work of ministration. Her character meets us as presenting the same marked features as those which were conspicuous in her son. From her, who followed Jesus and ministered to him of her substance (<420803>Luke 8:3), who sought for her two sons that they might sit, one on his right hand, the other on his left, in his kingdom (<402020>Matthew 20:20), he might well derive 5 his strong affections, his capacity for giving and receiving love, his eagerness for the speedy manifestation of the Messiah’s kingdom. The early years of the apostle we may believe to have passed under this influence. He would be trained in all that constituted the ordinary education of Jewish boyhood. Though not taught in the schools of Jerusalem, and therefore, in later life, liable to the reproach of having no recognized position as a teacher, no Rabbinical education (<440413>Acts 4:13), he would yet be taught to read the Law and observe its precepts, to feed on the writings of the prophets with the feeling that their accomplishment was not far off. 2. Incidents recorded of him in the New Testament. — The ordinary life of the fisherman of the Sea of Galilee was at last broken in upon by the news that a prophet had once more appeared. The voice of John the Baptist was heard in the wilderness of Judaea, and the publicans, peasants, soldiers, and fishermen of Galilee gathered round him. Among these were the two sons of Zebedaeus and their friends. With them perhaps was One whom as yet they knew not. They heard, it may be, of John’s protests against the vices of their own ruler — against the hypocrisy of Pharisees and Scribes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Story of the Byzantine Empire
    THE STO RY O F T HE NATIO NS L LU T T E E R VO L . I z M o I S A . P , R D , T H E E AR L I E R VO L UM E S A R E f I N E F R E E B P o AS A . SO T H STO R Y O G E C . y r . I . HARR R F R E B TH U ILM A N T HE STO Y O O M . y A R R G EW B P f A K O S E R F T HE S . o S . M T HE ST O Y O J y r . J . H R B Z N R O F DE . A R A coz I T HE ST O Y C HA L A . y . — R F E R N . B S B ING O U L THE ST O Y O G MA Y y . AR G D F N W B P f H B YE S E N o . H . O T HE ST O R Y O O R A Y . y r N E n E B . E . a d S SA H T HE ST O R Y O F SP A I . y U N AL N B P R of. A . VAM B Y T HE STO R Y O F H U GA R Y . y r E ST R O F E B P of L E TH E O Y C A RT H A G .
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Rahner's Work on the Assumption of Mary Into Heaven
    Karl Rahner’s Work on the Assumption of Mary into Heaven By Mark F. Fischer, St. John’s Seminary, Camarillo [Mark F. Fischer is Professor of Theology at St. John’s Seminary, the seminary of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles. He wrote his doctoral dissertation on Hans-Georg Gadamer and the Catholic Theology of Tradition (Berkeley: Graduate Theological Union, 1985). In 2005 he published The Foundations of Karl Rahner, a paraphrase of Rahner’s Foundations of Catholic Faith.] Abstract Karl Rahner completed his Assumptio Beatae Mariae Virginis in 1951 but did not receive permission to publish it from his Jesuit superiors. The work was only published in 2004, twenty years after Rahner’s death. This essay examines his treatise on the Assumption of Mary and the objections of the censors. The relation between the treatise and Rahner’s publication of 1947, “On the Theology of Death,” receives special attention. The shorter work was appended to the Marian treatise as an “excursus” but laid the foundation for the later work. Rahner reinterpreted the dogma of the Assumption in light of the resurrection of the dead, which the assumption of Mary’s body and soul into heaven anticipates. Among Rahner’s many speculative comments, this essay focuses on three. First, at the final resurrection, the soul (separated at death from the body) re-creates a new and glorified body as its fulfillment and perfection. Second, the glorified body expresses a metaphysical holiness that matures between the moment of death and the final judgment. And third, the resurrection of the body completes the transformation of the world as a new heaven and a new earth that began with the Incarnation.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the Justinian Code on Byzantine Society
    Danya Bubar Context Under Consideration: Byzantium 1. Hypothesis: The Justinian Code did not impact his Byzantine society. 2. Sources / Limitations of study Brownworth, L. (2007). 12 Byzantine Rulers: The History of the Byzantine Empire. [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from http://www.12byzantinerulers.com/rss.xml. Cameron, Averil. (2006). The Byzantines. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. Canning, J. (1996). History of Medieval Political Thought, 300-1450. London, GBR: Routledge. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc?id=10058158&ppg =23. Evans, J. A. S. (2000). Age of Justinian: The Circumstances of Imperial Power. London, GBR: Routledge. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc?id=100 70712&ppg=23. Gibbon, E . (2001). Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Volume IV. London, GBR: ElecBook, 2001. p lxxiii. http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc? id=2001727&ppg=73. Gigantès, P. (2002). The Secret History of Rulers of the World. London: Magpie Books. Nicol, D. M. (1991). A Biographical Dictionary of the Byzantine Empire. London: Seaby. Stein, P. (1999). Roman Law in European History. Port Chester, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc?id=10014895 &ppg=43. Tellegen-Couperus, O. (1993). Short History of Roman Law. London, GBR: Routledge, Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/lib/unblib/doc?id=10060619 &ppg=153. Venning, T. (2006). A Chronology of the Byzantine Empire. Great Britain: Palmgrave MacMillian. Limitations of these sources may lie within the authors’ observations of the historical contexts being discusses; this may suggest the presence of author bias, given that the information provided is subjective to their interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • How Orthodox Is the Eastern Orthodox Church?
    How Orthodox is the Eastern Orthodox Church? Introduction As a result of some questions I thought it wise to give a simple evaluation of the Eastern Orthodox Church (EOC). 1 This is even more relevant since recent decades have seen hordes of evangelicals (especially disaffected Charismatics) relocate into the EOC under the presumption that it has more fundamental historic prestige than modern churches. While in some doctrines the EOC has been a safeguard of apostolic and early church patriarchal teaching (such as the Trinity), and while they hold to good Greek NT manuscripts, we should not accept a multitude of other teachings and practices which are unbiblical. You should also be aware that this church has formally condemned Calvinism in church statutes. The answer to the question, ‘ How Orthodox is the Eastern Orthodox Church? ’ is simply, ‘ Not very; in fact it is downright heretical in doctrine and practice ’. Here are the reasons why; but first I will give a potted history of the Orthodox Church. History What is the EOC? The Orthodox Church, or the Eastern Orthodox Church, 2 is a federation of Churches originating in the Greek-speaking Church of the Byzantine Empire, which reject the authority of the Roman Pope. It has the Patriarch of Constantinople 3 as its head and uses elaborate and archaic rituals. It calls itself, ‘The Holy Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church’. I will try to make this very complicated history as simple as I can. The history is also hindered by different sources contradicting each other and making mistakes of fact. Pre Chalcedon (to 451) The initial foundations of Greek theology were laid down by the Greek Fathers, such as Athanasius, John Chrysostom, Cyril of Alexandria, and the Cappadocian Fathers (the ‘Three Hierarchs’) i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Ad Caeli Reginam
    Ad Caeli Reginam accepted so that with the encyclical Ad Caeli Reginam, of October 11, 1954, Pope Pius XII instituted the feast of the Queenship of Mary.[2] 2 Basic teachings According to Catholic teaching Mary should be called Queen, not only because of her divine motherhood of Je- sus Christ, but also because God has willed her to have an exceptional role in the work of salvation. Mary was cho- sen as Mother of Christ in order that she might become a partner in the redemption of the human race: “As Christ, the new Adam must be called a King not merely because He is Son of God, but also because He is our Redeemer, so, analogously, the Most Blessed Virgin is queen not only because she is Mother of God, but also because, as the new Eve, she was associated with the new Adam.”[3] 3 Context The Church has always taught that Mary is far above all other creatures in dignity, and after her Son possesses pri- macy over all. Germanus of Constantinople says: “Your honor and dignity surpass the whole of creation; your Botticelli, the coronation of the Virgin greatness places you above the angels.” And St. John Damascene goes so far as to say: “Limitless is the dif- Ad Caeli Reginam is an encyclical of Pope Pius XII, ference between God’s servants and His Mother.” [4] given at Rome, from St. Peter’s Basilica, on the feast of Pius XII quotes his predecessors: Pope Pius IX, “With a the Maternity of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the eleventh heart that is truly a mother’s,” does she approach the prob- day of October, 1954, in the sixteenth year of his Pon- lem of our salvation, and is solicitous for the whole hu- tificate.
    [Show full text]
  • “May the Divine Will Always Be Blessed!” Newsletter No
    The Pious Universal Union for the Children of the Divine Will Official Newsletter for “The Pious Universal Union for Children of the Divine Will –USA” Come Supreme Will, down to reign in Your Kingdom on earth and in our hearts! ROGATE! FIAT ! “May the Divine Will always be blessed!” Newsletter No. 130 – March 4 A.D. 2013 “Now I die more content, because the Divine Volition consoled me more than usual with your presence in these lasts instants of my life. Now I see a long, beautiful and wide Road, illuminated by infinite and shining Suns... Oh, yes, I recognize them! They are the Suns of my acts done in the Divine Will. This is the road which I now must follow. It is the way prepared for me by the Divine Volition, it is the road of my triumph, it is the road of my glory, to connect me in the immense happiness of the Divine Will. It is my road, it is the road which I will reserve for you, dear Father; it is the road which I will reserve for all those souls who will want to live in the Divine Will.” 1 The Holy Death of Luisa Piccarreta By Padre Bernardino Bucci At the news of Luisa’s death which occurred on March 4 A.D. 1947, it seemed that the people of Corato paused to live a unique and extraordinary event. Their Luisa, their Saint, was no more. And like a river in full spate they poured into Luisa’s house to look at her and express their affection to her, for so many years esteemed and beloved by all.
    [Show full text]
  • Godność Człowieka I Dobro Wspólne W Papieskim Nauczaniu Społecznym
    Rozdział III Godność człowieka i dobro wspólne w nauczaniu papieskim w latach 1878−1958 1. Leon XIII i fundamenty papieskiego nauczania o godności człowieka i dobru wspólnym Nikomu nie wolno naruszać bezkarnie tej godności człowie- ka, którą sam Bóg z wielka czcią rozporządza899. Cel bowiem wytknięty państwu dotyczy wszystkich oby- wateli, bo jest nim dobro powszechne, w którym uczestni- czyć mają prawo wszyscy razem i każdy z osobna, w części należnej900. Uczestnicy współczesnego dyskursu politycznego w poszukiwaniu aksjologicznych fun- damentów dla ustawodawstwa krajowego czy ponadnarodowego odwołują się do takich kategorii, jak: wolność, równość, prawa człowieka. Do tych fundamentalnych idei zaliczyć należy również dignitas humana i bonum commune901. Wydaje się poza dyskusją, że wielką rolę w przetrwaniu i rozwoju tych idei odegrała katolicka nauka społeczna, co uzasadnia poddanie analizie poglądów w tej materii twórcy papieskiego nauczania społecznego Le- ona XIII. Wybrany 20 lutego 1878 r. na papieża arcybiskup Perugii, kardynał Vincenzo Gioacchi- no Aloiso Pecci (1810−1903) przybrał imię Leona XIII. Nowy papież rozbudził w środowi- skach katolickich, zwłaszcza w kręgach zajmujących się problemami społecznymi, wielkie nadzieje na zmiany, które byłyby w stanie dostosować Kościół katolicki do istniejących 899 Rerum novarum Jego Świątobliwości Leona, z opatrzności Bożej papieża XIII, encyklika o robot- nikach z 15 maja 1891 r. Osobne odbicie z „Notyfi kacyj” Kuryi Książęco-Biskupiej w Krakowie, nr VII i VIII z roku 1891, Kraków 1891, s. 27. 900 Ibidem, s. 33. 901 Szerzej na ten temat por. M. Sadowski, Godność człowieka – aksjologiczna podstawa państwa i prawa, [w:] Studia Erasmiana Wratislaviensia − Wrocławskie Studia Erazmiańskie, Zeszyt Naukowy Studentów, Doktorantów i Pracowników Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2007, s.
    [Show full text]
  • Saliha Gulnur Uzuner.Pdf
    T.C. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ FELSEFE VE DİN BİLİMLERİ ANABİLİM DALI KATOLİK MEZHEBİNE GÖRE İSA’NIN ANNESİ MERYEM Yüksek Lisans Tezi Saliha Gülnur UZUNER 10912661 ANKARA 2015 T.C. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ FELSEFE VE DİN BİLİMLERİ ANABİLİM DALI KATOLİK MEZHEBİNE GÖRE İSA’NIN ANNESİ MERYEM Yüksek Lisans Tezi Saliha Gülnur UZUNER 10912661 Tez Danışmanı Prof. Dr. Ali İsra GÜNGÖR ANKARA 2015 T.C. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ FELSEFE VE DİN BİLİMLERİ ANABİLİM DALI KATOLİK MEZHEBİNE GÖRE İSA’NIN ANNESİ MERYEM Yüksek Lisans Tezi Tez Danışmanı: Prof Dr. Ali İsra GÜNGÖR Tez Jürisi Üyeleri Adı ve Soyadı İmzası 1. Prof. Dr. Ali İsra GÜNGÖR 2. Prof. Dr. Durmuş Arık 3. Doç. Dr. Ali Osman KURT Tez Sınavı Tarihi: TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ MÜDÜRLÜĞÜNE Bu belge ile, bu tezdeki bütün bilgilerin akademik kurallara ve etik davranış ilkelerine uygun olarak toplanıp sunulduğunu beyan ederim. Bu kural ve ilkelerin gereği olarak, çalışmada bana ait olmayan tüm veri, düşünce ve sonuçları andığımı ve kaynağını gösterdiğimi ayrıca beyan ederim. (30/09/2015) Saliha Gülnur UZUNER İÇİNDEKİLER İÇİNDEKİLER .......................................................................................................5 ÖNSÖZ ....................................................................................................................9 GİRİŞ .................................................................................................................... 12 A.KONUNUN ÖNEMİ,
    [Show full text]
  • Justinian and the Corpus Iuris: an Overview
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318558838 Justinian and the Corpus Iuris: An Overview Article in SSRN Electronic Journal · January 2017 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2994134 CITATIONS READS 0 78 1 author: Rafael Domingo Osle Emory University 65 PUBLICATIONS 37 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Law and Religion View project Law and Religion View project All content following this page was uploaded by Rafael Domingo Osle on 17 January 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Justinian and the Corpus Iuris. An Overview Rafael Domingo Spruill Family Research Professor of Law. Emory University ICS Professor of Law. University of Navarra The most important legal undertaking of Antiquity was the compilation of what was later called Corpus Iuris Civilis promulgated by Emperor Justinian. It is rightly said that this body of laws and jurisprudence, along with Aristotelian writings and the Bible, constitutes one of the three pillars of Western culture. The Corpus Iuris, a true temple of justice, is both an endpoint and a starting point in world history. Histories of Rome usually end with Justinian’s Corpus Iuris; Byzantine histories and Western legal histories, on the other hand, begin with the Corpus Iuris. Justinian’s codification is the bridge that links Antiquity, the Byzantine Empire, and Europe. It is also the link between civil law and common law, and between canon law and civil law. To know about the Corpus Iuris is to know about something that was instrumental for the development of justice and law in the past, continues to operate in the present, and will probably have its impact in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saint Francis Xavier's Messenger
    The Saint Francis Xavier’s Messenger - #19– August 2016 Newsletter of the Society of Saint Pius X in Sri Lanka ——————— The Assumption of the Virgin Mary Into Heaven The truth that Our Lady was assumed into heaven people of God who had made supplication for the was always believed and celebrated by the Church definition of the dogma of the faith with regard to although it was not considered a dogma of the Mary's bodily Assumption into heaven. On the 1st Faith until the 1st November May 1946 Pope Pius XII decided 1950. From very ancient times, to send an encyclical letter the Church in the east and west entitled “Deiparae Virginis solemnly celebrated a liturgical Mariae” to his venerable feast in memorial of the brother Patriarchs, Primates, “Dormition of Mary” or the Archbishops, and other “Assumption of Our Lady into Ordinaries at peace and in heaven”. In the Gregorian communion with the Apostolic Sacramentary which Pope See regarding the proposal to Adrian I sent to Charles the definitively define the dogma of Great between the years 784- the Assumption of the Virgin 790 one finds the following Mary. In this letter, the Holy original text: “Venerable to us, Father asked that they “raise O Lord, is the festivity of this insistent prayers to God so that day on which the holy Mother He might clearly manifest the of God suffered temporal will of His ever-adorable death, but still could not be goodness in this kept down by the bonds of instance” (Pope Pius XII death, who has begotten Thy “Deiparae Virginis Mariae” no 3) Son Our Lord incarnate
    [Show full text]
  • Deiparae Virginis Mariae Catholic.Net
    Deiparae Virginis Mariae Catholic.net Deiparae Virginis Mariae To the Patriarchs Primates, Archbishops, and other Ordinaries at Peace and in Communion with the Apostolic See.* The Christian people have never ceased to invoke and experience the Blessed Virgin Mary's assistance, and therefore they have, at all times, venerated her with ever growing devotion. 2. And so, because love when it is true and deeply felt tends of its own nature to manifest itself through ever renewed demonstrations, the faithful have vied with one another all through the centuries in expressing at all times their ardent piety toward the Queen of Heaven. In our opinion, this is the reason why, for a long time past, numerous petitions (those received from 1849 to 1940 have been gathered in two volumes which, accompanied with suitable comments, have been recently printed), from cardinals, patriarchs, archbishops, bishops, priests, religious of both sexes, associations, universities and innumerable private persons have reached the Holy See, all begging that the bodily Assumption into heaven of the Blessed Virgin should be defined and proclaimed as a dogma of faith. And certainly no one is unaware of the fact that this was fervently requested by almost two hundred fathers in the Vatican Council. 3. But We, who are charged with the care of defending and developing the Kingdom of Christ, have at the same time to exercise continual care and vigilance to keep away everything adverse to this Kingdom, and to support whatsoever may promote it. Therefore, from the beginning of Our Pontificate, we had to examine most carefully whether it would be lawful, convenient and useful to support with Our authority the above mentioned petitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ahistory of the Byzantine Empire
    EMPIRE OF GOLD: A HISTORY OF THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE COURSE GUIDE Professor Thomas F. Madden SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY www.malankaralibrary.com Empire of Gold: A History of the Byzantine Empire Professor Thomas F. Madden Saint Louis University Recorded Books™ is a trademark of Recorded Books, LLC. All rights reserved. www.malankaralibrary.com Empire of Gold: A History of the Byzantine Empire Professor Thomas F. Madden Executive Producer John J. Alexander Executive Editor Donna F. Carnahan RECORDING Producer - David Markowitz Director - Matthew Cavnar COURSE GUIDE Editor - James Gallagher Design - Edward White Lecture content ©2006 by Thomas F. Madden Course guide ©2006 by Recorded Books, LLC 72006 by Recorded Books, LLC Cover image: © Mario Bruno/shutterstock.com #UT094 ISBN: 978-1-4281-3268-9 All beliefs and opinions expressed in this audio/video program and accompanying course guide are those of the author and not of Recorded Books, LLC, or its employees. www.malankaralibrary.com Course Syllabus Empire of Gold: A History of the Byzantine Empire About Your Professor...................................................................................................4 Introduction...................................................................................................................5 Lecture 1 The Emerging Empire of New Rome, 284–457 ....................................6 Lecture 2 Justinian and the Reconquest of the West, 457–565..........................10 Lecture 3 The City of Constantinople: A Guided Tour of the Greatest City in the
    [Show full text]