DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Forecasting and Modeling Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Forecasting and Modeling Report DRAFT FORECASTING AND MODELING REPORT MAY 2021 Metropolitan Transportation Association of City Representatives Commission Bay Area Governments Nikki Fortunato Bas Alfredo Pedroza, Chair Jesse Arreguín, President Councilmember, City of Oakland Napa County and Cities Mayor, City of Berkeley London Breed Nick Josefowitz, Vice Chair Belia Ramos, Vice President Mayor, City and County of San Francisco San Francisco Mayor's Appointee Supervisor, County of Napa Tom Butt Margaret Abe-Koga David Rabbitt, Mayor, City of Richmond Cities of Santa Clara County Immediate Past President Pat Eklund Supervisor, County of Sonoma Eddie H. Ahn Mayor, City of Novato San Francisco Bay Conservation Maya Esparza and Development Commission County Representatives Councilmember, City of San José David Canepa Candace Andersen Carroll Fife San Mateo County Supervisor, County of Contra Costa Councilmember, City of Oakland Cindy Chavez David Canepa Neysa Fligor Santa Clara County Supervisor, County of San Mateo Mayor, City of Los Altos Damon Connolly Keith Carson Leon Garcia Marin County and Cities Supervisor, County of Alameda Mayor, City of American Canyon Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cindy Chavez Liz Gibbons Cities of Alameda County Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of Campbell Dina El-Tawansy Otto Lee Giselle Hale California State Transportation Agency Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Vice Mayor, City of Redwood City (CalSTA) Gordon Mar Barbara Halliday Victoria Fleming Supervisor, City and County Mayor, City of Hayward Sonoma County and Cities of San Francisco Rich Hillis Dorene M. Giacopini Rafael Mandelman Planning Director, City and U.S. Department of Transportation Supervisor, City and County County of San Francisco Federal D. Glover of San Francisco Dave Hudson Contra Costa County Nate Miley Mayor, City of San Ramon Sam Liccardo Supervisor, County of Alameda Matthew Mahan San José Mayor's Appointee Karen Mitchoff Councilmember, City of San José Nate Miley Supervisor, County of Contra Costa Raul Peralez Alameda County Stephanie Moulton-Peters Councilmember, City of San José Gina Papan Supervisor, County of Marin Carlos Romero Cities of San Mateo County James P. Spering Mayor, City of East Palo Alto David Rabbitt Supervisor, County of Solano Loren Taylor Association of Bay Area Governments Vacant Councilmember, City of Oakland Hillary Ronen County of San Mateo Lori Wilson City and County of San Francisco Mayor, City of Suisun City Libby Schaaf Vacant Oakland Mayor's Appointee Cities in Sonoma County James P. Spering Vacant Solano County and Cities City and County of San Francisco Amy R. Worth (Mayor's Appointee) Cities of Contra Costa County Vacant Advisory Member U.S. Department of Housing Jayne Battey and Urban Development Board Member, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board i Association of Bay Area Governments 375 Beale Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94105-2066 www.abag.ca.gov | 415.820.7900 Metropolitan Transportation Commission 375 Beale Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105-2066 www.mtc.ca.gov | 415.778.6700 Draft Plan Bay Area 2050: Forecasting and Modeling Report Project Staff Dave Vautin Plan Bay Area 2050 Project Manager Lisa Zorn Forecasting and Modeling Project Manager James Choe, Benjamin Espinosa, Paul Fassinger, Shimon Israel, Shijia Bobby Lu, Aksel Olsen, Michael Reilly, Elizabeth Theocharides, Flavia Tsang, Yuqi Wang Regional Planning Program Forecasting and Modeling Report Contributors Acknowledgements Cover Design Miguel Osorio Editor John Goodwin Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................... 1 Findings Summary ................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1: Introduction .......................................................................... 3 Consistency with the Regional Housing Needs Allocation ................................. 4 Model System Overview ......................................................................... 4 Regional Growth Forecast and Land Use Model Interaction ..................................... 7 Land Use Model and Travel Model Interaction ..................................................... 9 Chapter 2: Regional Growth Forecast ....................................................... 10 Forecast Modeling Suite ....................................................................... 10 Modeling Context ............................................................................... 10 REMI Modeling ................................................................................... 11 Adjustments to REMI Baseline ....................................................................... 12 Integrating COVID-19 Pandemic and Subsequent Recession .................................... 14 Strategy Implementation ............................................................................. 14 Households ....................................................................................... 17 Income ............................................................................................ 19 Findings: Regional Growth Forecast Results ................................................ 20 Employment Growth and Change ................................................................... 21 Population Growth and Change ..................................................................... 21 Household Income Distribution ...................................................................... 22 Housing Production .................................................................................... 23 Chapter 3: Land Use Model .................................................................... 25 Bay Area UrbanSim 2 Land Use Model Application ........................................ 25 Model Estimation, Calibration and Review ................................................. 29 Input Assumptions .............................................................................. 29 Base Year Spatial Database .......................................................................... 30 Development Capacity ................................................................................ 34 Annual Business Totals ............................................................................... 35 Annual Household Totals ............................................................................. 35 Model Agents ........................................................................................... 36 Environmental Factors ................................................................................ 38 Baseline Policies ....................................................................................... 39 EIR Alternatives ................................................................................. 39 D r a f t Plan Bay Area 20 5 0 P a g e | i Growth Geography Framework ...................................................................... 40 Strategy Implementation ...................................................................... 43 Strategy H1: Further Strengthen Renter Protections Beyond State Law ..................... 43 Strategy H2: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing .............................................. 43 Strategy H3: Allow a Greater Mix of Housing Densities and Types in Growth Geographies 44 Strategy H4: Build Adequate Affordable Housing to Ensure Homes for All ................... 49 Strategy H5: Integrate Affordable Housing into All Major Housing Projects ................. 50 Strategy H6: Transform Aging Malls and Office Parks into Neighborhoods ................... 50 Strategy H8: Accelerate Reuse of Public and Community-Owned Land for Mixed-Income Housing and Essential Services ...................................................................... 53 Strategy EC2: Expand Job Training and Incubator Programs ................................... 55 Strategy EC4: Allow Greater Commercial Densities in Growth Geographies ................. 56 Strategy EC5: Provide Incentives to Employers to Shift Jobs to Housing-Rich Areas Well- Served by Transit ...................................................................................... 57 Strategy EC6: Retain and Invest in Key Industrial Lands ........................................ 57 Strategy EC7: Assess Transportation Impact Fees on New Office Developments ........... 58 Strategy EC8: Implement Office Development Caps in Job-Rich Cities ....................... 59 Strategy EN1: Adapt to Sea Level Rise ............................................................. 59 Strategy EN4: Maintain Urban Growth Boundaries ............................................... 60 Strategy EN7: Expand Commute Trip Reduction Programs at Major Employers ............. 62 Findings ........................................................................................... 62 Regional Land Use Outcomes ........................................................................ 62 Small Zone Outcomes ................................................................................. 65 Jobs-Housing Balance Outcomes .................................................................... 66 Housing Affordability Outcomes .................................................................... 66 Chapter 4: Travel Model ....................................................................... 68 Travel Modeling Suite .......................................................................... 68 Population Synthesizer ..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Plan Bay Area 2050 Air Quality Conformity Analysis
    DRAFT AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY AND CONSISTENCY REPORT JULY 2021 PBA2050 COMMISH BOARD DRAFT 06.14.21 Metropolitan Transportation Association of City Representatives Commission Bay Area Governments Susan Adams Alfredo Pedroza, Chair Jesse Arreguín, President Councilmember, City of Rohnert Park Napa County and Cities Mayor, City of Berkeley Nikki Fortunato Bas Nick Josefowitz, Vice Chair Belia Ramos, Vice President Councilmember, City of Oakland San Francisco Mayor's Appointee Supervisor, County of Napa London Breed Margaret Abe-Koga David Rabbitt, Mayor, City and County of San Francisco Cities of Santa Clara County Immediate Past President Tom Butt Supervisor, County of Sonoma Eddie H. Ahn Mayor, City of Richmond San Francisco Bay Conservation Pat Eklund and Development Commission County Representatives Mayor, City of Novato David Canepa Candace Andersen Maya Esparza San Mateo County Supervisor, County of Contra Costa Councilmember, City of San José Cindy Chavez David Canepa Carroll Fife Santa Clara County Supervisor, County of San Mateo Councilmember, City of Oakland Damon Connolly Keith Carson Neysa Fligor Marin County and Cities Supervisor, County of Alameda Mayor, City of Los Altos Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cindy Chavez Leon Garcia Cities of Alameda County Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of American Canyon Dina El-Tawansy Otto Lee Liz Gibbons California State Transportation Agency Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of Campbell (CalSTA) Gordon Mar Giselle Hale Victoria Fleming Supervisor, City and County Vice Mayor, City of Redwood City Sonoma County and Cities of San Francisco Barbara Halliday Dorene M. Giacopini Rafael Mandelman Mayor, City of Hayward U.S. Department of Transportation Supervisor, City and County Rich Hillis Federal D.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Caltrain Short Term Service Study
    Caltrain Short-Term Service and Fleet Study FINAL REPORT Prepared for the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board By SYSTRA Consulting March 2000 Cal, TM Caltrain Short-Term Service and Fleet Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Acknowledgements 1 2. Executive Summary 2 3. Introduction and Purpose 6 4. Service and Performance Standards 7 5. Ridership Trends 9 6. Dwell Time Reduction 13 7. Short Term Service Options 14 7.1 Service Option No.1: Schedule Optimization to Address Reverse Peak 14 7.2 Service Option NO.2: Selected Trains Turn at Millbrae Station 21 7.3 Service Option NO.3: Palo Alto to Gilroy Additional Train Service 28 7.4 Service Option NO.4: Medium-Term Schedule Optimization 34 7.5 Service Option NO.5: Medium-Term Schedule Optimization, Gilroy Service Extension 42 7.6 Service Option NO.6: Medium-Term Completely New Schedule, Repetitive Zone Patterns 49 7.7 Key Recommendations 57 8. Related Service Planning Issues 59 8.1 Yard and Terminal Capacity 59 8.2 Third Track Utilization and Capital Requirements 60 9. Source Documents 64 10. Appendix 65 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Summary Table of Findings 5 Table 2: Factors Expected to Influence Ridership Increases 11 Table 3: County-to-County Commuting in the San Francisco Bay Area 1990-2020 12 Table 4: Service Options Matrix 15 Table 5: Conceptual Train-Equipment Cycles for Service Option No.1 19 Table 6: Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost Indices for Service Option No.1 20 Table 7: Conceptual Train-Equipment Cycles for Service Option No.2 25 Table 8: Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost Indices
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Fact Sheet and Muni Tips With
    8x Public Transit Fact 30 Sheet Map 45 FERRY BUILDING BART BART Stations BART/Muni Stations AND AKL GE ID Muni Subway Stations Muni Bus & Rail EMBARCADERO STATION - O F. 49 S. Y BR For route, schedule, 14 BA fare and accessible MONTGOMERY STATION 14x services information T anytime: Call 311 or visit www.sfmta.com POWELL STATION TRANSBAY TERMINAL (AC TRANSIT) N MARKET ST. CIVIC CENTER STATION 30 8x 45 VAN NESS STATION MISSION ST. D x N 14 U CALTRAIN O J R Caltrain to San Jose San to Caltrain 4TH & KING G K ER D SamTrans to S.F. Airport N N U T CHURCH STATION 16TH ST. N CASTRO STATION STATION 14 K T T 49 22ND ST. 14L 48 STATION FOREST HILL STATION 48 24TH ST. STATION 48 J 8x 14x WEST PORTAL MISSION ST. STATION GLEN PARK STATION 14 14x BART BALBOA K PARK 49 STATION 49 54 T 14 54 8x DALY CITY 14L SAN MATEO COUNTY BAYSHORE STATION STATION San Francisco Public Transit Options FACT SHEET AND MUNI ROUTE TIPS Muni bus routes providing alternate, parallel service to BART service within San Francisco are indicated with numbers, while Muni rail lines are indicated with letters. Adult full Muni fare is $2. Youth and Senior/Disabled fare is 75 cents. Exact change or Clipper Cards are required on Muni vehicles; Muni Metro tickets can be purchased at the Metro vend- ing machines in the subway stations for use at subway fare gates. To reach San Francisco International Airport or other peninsula destinations use SamTrans or Caltrain service.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F Essential Facilities and Infrastructure Within San Francisco County City and County of San Francisco
    Appendix F Essential Facilities and Infrastructure within San Francisco County City and County of San Francisco Hazard Mitigation Plan Table F-1: Essential Facilities and Infrastructure Within San Francisco County Asset Department Facility Type Facility Name ID 1 AAM Museum Asian Art Museum 2 ACC Veterinarian Animal Shelter 3 CAS Museum California Academy of Sciences 4 CFD Convention Facility Moscone Center North 5 CFD Convention Facility Moscone Center South 6 CFD Convention Facility Moscone Center West 7 DEM Emergency Center Emergency Operations Center 8 DPH Medical Clinic Castro Mission Health Center (Health Center #1) 9 DPH Medical Clinic Chinatown Public Health Center (Health Center #4) 10 DPH Medical Clinic Curry Senior Service Center 11 DPH Medical Clinic Maxine Hall Health Center (Health Center #2) 12 DPH Medical Clinic Ocean Park Health Center (Health Center #5) 13 DPH Medical Clinic Potrero Hill Health Center 14 DPH Medical Clinic San Francisco City Clinic 15 DPH Medical Clinic Silver Avenue Health Center (Health Center #3) 16 DPH Medical Clinic Southeast Health Center 17 DPH Mental Health Center Chinatown Child Development Center 18 DPH Mental Health Center Mission Mental Health Services 19 DPH Mental Health Center S Van Ness Mental Health/Mission Family Center 20 DPH Mental Health Center SE Child/Family Therapy Center 21 DPH Mental Health Center South of Market Mental Health Services 22 DPH Hospital Laguna Honda Hospital 23 DPH Hospital San Francisco General Hospital 24 DPH Office Onondaga Building 25 DPH Office CHN Headquarters
    [Show full text]
  • Complaints by Practice, Business, and Year Based on Complaint by Practice
    Complaints By Practice, Business, and Year Based on Complaint By Practice OpenedYear PracticeName 2013 Abandonment of MH 2020 Abandonment of MH 2021 Abandonment of MH 2014 Abandonment of MH 2013 Abandonment of MH 2014 Abandonment of MH 2013 Abandonment of MH 2021 Abandonment of MH 2015 Abandonment of MH 2018 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2019 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2021 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2019 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2021 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2018 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) Page 1 of 480 09/25/2021 Complaints By Practice, Business, and Year Based on Complaint By Practice BusinessName id 3 1 1 Comcast 1 Easy Acres Mobile Home Park 1 Leisure Estates 1 Pinecroft Mobile Home Park 1 T-Mobile 1 1 3 1 6 2 Baths Only fka Nathan Construction 1 Clallam Bay Corrections Center 1 Disability Rights Washington 1 Fidelity Investments 1 Fred Meyer 1 JAMS Mediation Arbitration and ADR Services 1 King County Metro 1 Page 2 of 480 09/25/2021 Complaints By Practice, Business, and Year Based on Complaint By Practice 2019 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2021 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2019 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2020 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2019 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2019 ADA (Americans w/Disabilities Act) 2021
    [Show full text]
  • Castro Station Accessibility Improvements Civic Design Review Phase 1 March 2018
    CASTRO STATION ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW PHASE 1 MARCH 2018 CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CASTRO STATION ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS | Castro St & Market St 1 CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW PHASE 1 | MARCH 2018 SFMTA’S GOALS/OBJECTIVES SFMTA’s goal and standard are to provide uninterrupted elevator access at all underground stations. This standard has been adopted by The Central Subway Project. SFMTA is working to incorporate the standard in existing stations by upgrading and to create elevator redundancy. ELEVATOR UPGRADES existing adding new elevators This is a list of projects: E L E V A T O R S SFMTA SUBWAY SAFETY AND RELIABILITY UPGRADE PROJECT at the following stations: • Van Ness CASTRO • Church • Castro • Forest Hill • Powell • Central subway project E S C A L A T O R S ESCALATOR MODERNIZATION PROJECT PHASE II Replacement of 17 escalators in the subway system. P R O J E C T S C O P E OF W O R K Add on the south-side of the Castro Station only: new elevator accessible path CASTRO STATION ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS | Castro St & Market St 2 Building Design & Construction CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW PHASE 1 | MARCH 2018 PROJECT TIMELINE & OUTREACH ACTIVITIES CASTRO STATION ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS TIMELINE 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 pre-design/outreach competition advisory pre-design/outreach/CDR CD’s /permit/bid construction outreach outreach Project Web Site Castro Merchants Friends of Harvey Milk Plaza Eureka Valley Neighborhood Assoc. SFMTA’s: * Multimodal Accessibility Advisory Committee (MAAC) Castro
    [Show full text]
  • Equity and Shared Mobility Services Working with the Private Sector to Meet Equity Objectives Acknowledgements November 2019
    Equity and Shared Mobility Services Working with the Private Sector to Meet Equity Objectives Acknowledgements November 2019 SUMC expresses appreciation to interviewees from the following organizations: Chicago Department of Transportation, District of Columbia, Center for Community Transportation (Ithaca Carshare), Ridecell, Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority, Capital Metro, Zipcar, Kansas City Area Transportation Authority, and HourCar. Sarah Jo Peterson, 23 Urban Strategies, LLC, led the research for SUMC, which also included researchers Brian Holland, Erin Evenhouse, and Peter Lauer, under the direction of Ellen Partridge and Sharon Feigon. The paper was edited by Leslie Gray. © 2019 Shared-Use Mobility Center. All Rights Reserved. Shared-Use Mobility Center Chicago, IL 312.448.8083 Los Angeles, CA 818.489.8651 www.sharedusemobilitycenter.org Contents Executive Summary 01 Introduction 06 Equity in Shared Mobility Services: What Is It? 07 Types of Equity Initiatives and Programs 08 Equity Analysis across Multiple Dimensions 08 Understanding Public-Private Partnerships 12 Best Practices for Public-Private Partnerships 13 Opportunities to Meet Equity Objectives: 15 Vehicle Sharing Permitting and Partnerships 16 Concerns for Low-Income Communities 18 Focus on Bikeshare: Activists Organize to Advance Equity 20 Case Example 21 Focus on Carshare: Model Programs for Low-Income Drivers 26 Case Example 27 Vehicle Sharing as Part of a Multimodal Lifestyle 29 Opportunities to Meet Equity Objectives: 30 Sharing the Ride The Public Sector’s Role:
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information Civic Center/ UN Plaza Station San Francisco
    Transit Information For more detailed information about BART service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. CC (#) CC Civic Center/ SamTrans provides bus service San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective May 26, 2018 AC Transit (Alameda-Contra Costa AC Transit (Distrito de Tránsito de AC Transit (Alameda-Contra Costa Schedule Information effective March 31, 2018 Transit (BART) rail service connects Transit District) provides local bus Alameda y Contra Costa) Transit District) 为康特拉科斯塔县和阿 throughout San Mateo County UN Plaza the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices include a 50¢ sur- service for parts of western Alameda proporciona servicio local de autobús 拉梅达县西部地区提供当地的巴士服 and to Peninsula BART stations, Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. charge per trip for using magnetic and Contra Costa counties. AC Transit a ciertas zonas al oeste de los 务。AC Transit 也提供 Transbay（跨 湾） Market & 7th Bus Stop Caltrain stations, and downtown Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and A quick reference guide to service hours from this stripe tickets. Riders using also operates transbay routes to San Francisco condados de Alameda y Contra Costa. AC 巴士服务，服务于 San Francisco（旧 金 山）和 Line 800 San Francisco. For more information visit Station other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. Clipper® can avoid this surcharge. and the Peninsula. For more information, call Transit también gestiona las rutas hacia San Peninsula（半岛地区）。如想了解更多详情，请致电 www.samtrans.com, or call 1-800-660-4287 Francisco International Airport (SFO) and (510) 891-4777 or visit actransit.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerating the Transition to Zevs in Shared and Autonomous Fleets
    Accelerating the transition to ZEVs in shared and autonomous fleets December 4, 2018 Table of contents Executive summary 5 1 Introduction 8 2 Background 10 Electromobility 10 Shared passenger mobility models 11 Shared electric passenger fleets 11 Vehicular automation 12 Barriers to adoption 13 3 Review of implications for low-carbon transportation 15 ZEVs 15 Shared 16 Autonomous 18 ZEV + shared 19 ZEV + autonomous 20 Shared + autonomous 20 ZEV + shared + autonomous 20 4 Electromobility in shared mobility fleets 22 Vehicle type 22 Profiles of users and riders of shared use mobility 22 Profiles of users and riders of shared use ZEVs & opportunities for acceleration 23 Challenges 23 Reasons for adopting BEVs in shared mobility 25 Logistics, operations of BEVs within shared use mobility 26 Trip distance 26 Daily vehicle kilometers traveled and parking time 27 BEV range and charging needs 28 5 Practicality and business case for BEVs in shared use mobility 30 Cost of ownership and BEV value proposition in car sharing 30 Cost of ownership and BEV value proposition in ride hailing 31 6 Shared electromobility deployment conclusions 35 Key success factors 35 Lessons learned 35 Policies that support electromobility in shared use fleets 36 Concluding remarks 38 Appendices A. Growth of shared mobility services 40 B. List of ZEV shared mobility services 41 C. Impacts of ride hailing 44 D. Example of BEV car sharing education tools 45 E. Uber ZEV-related communications 46 F. BEV in ride hailing payback, Montréal and London 48 Accelerating the Transition to ZEVs in Shared and Autonomous Fleets 2 List of figures and tables List of figures Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information Powell Station San Francisco
    Transit Information For more detailed information about BART service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. CC Powell San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Early Bird Express bus service AC Transit (Alameda-Contra Costa SamTrans provides bus service Mission Bay Shuttle is a free Schedule Information e ective February 10, 2020 Fares e ective January 1, 2020 Schedule Information throughout San Mateo County Transit (BART) rail service connects runs weekdays from 4:00 a.m. to 5:00 Transit District) provides local bus service, connecting the Mission Station the San Francisco Peninsula with Check before you go: up-to-date schedules are These prices are for riders using service for parts of western Alameda and to Peninsula BART stations, Bay development area to other a.m., before BART opens. There are Caltrain stations, and downtown San Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, available on www.bart.gov and the o cial BART Clipper®. There is a a 50¢ sur- and Contra Costa counties. AC Transit parts of downtown. For more thirteen lines connecting East Bay, Stop Francisco. For more information visit Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and app. Or, pick up a free schedule guide at a BART charge per trip for using magnetic San Francisco, and Peninsula BART stations. also operates transbay routes to San Francisco information, visit www.missionbaytma.org. ID www.samtrans.com, or call 1-800-660-4287 or other cities in the East Bay, as well as San information kiosk. A quick reference guide to service stripe tickets. For more information, call 510-465-2278.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Subway Partial Subway and Bridge Default
    Both the Partial Subway and Bridge and Full Subway options address SFMTA’s desire to How Do the Alternatives Compare? improve travel time and safety, but the Full Subway provides superior transit performance. 2011 2014-2015 2016 Default Parkmerced Plan (all surface) Partial Subway and Bridge Full Subway Track Configuration Surface Subway Bridge Tail Track Stop/Station To Daly City Transit Performance + Designs new stations to serve 3-car trains + Places the M-line in its own subway tunnel from south + + Places the M-line and part of the K-line in a subway from West + Adds new terminal in Parkmerced, which improves opera- of St. Francis Circle to Junipero Serra Blvd Portal station to Parkmerced tions flexibility + Designs new stations to serve 4-car trains + Designs new stations to serve 4-car trains - - Adds two more intersection crossings for the M-line which + Includes a new M-terminal in Parkmerced to improve + Includes a new M-terminal in Parkmerced to improve operating would negatively affect on-time performance and reliability operating flexibility flexibility - Adds a sharp turn to the M route, which would slow travel - Remaining surface crossings on West Portal Avenue + Shortest travel time time and wears out the train tracks more quickly continue to limit reliability and capacity + Maximizes subway reliability and capacity for the entire system Transit Access + Adds new light rail station in Parkmerced + Creates new underground stations at Stonestown, SF + Creates new underground stations at Stonestown, SF State and Moves the light rail to the west side of 19th Ave, which State and Parkmerced.
    [Show full text]
  • Floating Carsharing in Oakland, California
    UC Berkeley Recent Work Title An Evaluation Of Free- Floating Carsharing In Oakland, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3j722968 Authors Martin, Elliot, PhD Pan, Alexandra Shaheen, Susan Publication Date 2020-06-01 DOI 10.7922/G2N014SJ eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California AN EVALUATION OF FREE- FLOATING CARSHARING IN OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA ELLIOT MARTIN, PH.D. ALEXANDRA PAN SUSAN SHAHEEN, PH.D. UC BERKELEY TRANSPORTATION SUSTIANABILITY RESEARCH CENTER FINAL REPORT doi:10.7922/G2N014SJ JUNE 2020 Contents Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction .............................................................................................................................11 Shared Mobility Programs and Outreach in Low-Income Communities: Overview of Barriers to Usage and U.S.-Based Programs ........................................................................12 Barriers to Shared Mobility for Low-Income Communities ..............................................13 Spatial Barriers ................................................................................................................13 Financial Barriers .............................................................................................................14 Cultural Barriers ...............................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]