DOCSLIB.ORG

The European Security and Defence Policy (Esdp) After the Entry Into Force of the Lisbon Treaty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The European Security and Defence Policy (Esdp) After the Entry Into Force of the Lisbon Treaty T045-10 port CuaEstra 145Btz 6/4/10 08:35 Pgina 1 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Composicin MINISTERIO DE DEFENSA CUADERNOS de 145-B ESTRATEGIA SPANISH INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES THE EUROPEAN SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY (ESDP) AFTER THE ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE LISBON TREATY April 2010 CATÁLOGO GENERAL DE PUBLICACIONES OFICIALES http://www.060.es Edita: NIPO: 076-10-097-5 (edición en papel) NIPO: 076-10-098-0 (edición en línea) ISBN: 978-84-9781-573-4 Depósito Legal: M-14594-2010 Imprime: Imprenta del Ministerio de Defensa Tirada: 700 ejemplares Fecha de edición: abril 2010 DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INSTITUTIONAL DEFENCE RELATIONS Spanish Institute for Strategic Studies Working Group no 5/09 THE EUROPEAN SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY (ESDP) AFTER THE ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE LISBON TREATY The ideas contained here in are the responsability of the authors and not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IEEE, which has sponsored this publication. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION By Enrique Mora Benavente Chapter I EUROPEAN SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY By Félix Arteaga Martín Chapter II THE NEW LEGAL INSTRUMENTS OF THE COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY By María de la O Urrea Corres Chapter III CIVILIAN CAPABILITIES By Leonardo Sánchez Peláez Chapter IV MILITARY CAPABILITIES By José Enrique de Ayala Marín Chapter V TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS By Jordi Marsal Muntala Chapter VI EUROPEAN UNION-RUSSIA RELATIONS, THE «EASTERN PARTNERSHIP», THE FUTURE OF THE OSCE, AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES FOR THE COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY (CSDP) By Francisco José Ruiz González RECOMMENDATIONS By Enrique Mora Benavente COMPOSITION OF THE WORKING GROUP INDEX INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION ENRIQU E MORA BE NAV E NT E THE EUROPEAN UNION, A GLOBAL ACTOR? During the final months of 2009, under the Swedish Presidency, the European Union Member States engaged in a particularly intense de- bate on an issue which featured on the agenda of the meetings under the heading «Europe as a global actor». The debate took place at in- formal ministerial gatherings and other more technical meetings. It did not reach public attention, as it was a purely internal reflection that was more budgetary than political. The discussions were based on a series of hypotheses that were understood to be accepted by all the countries and sought to answer a set of questions. I wish to concentrate on the first part, the shared basic assumptions. It is important to realise that the ultimate aim of this exercise was to reflect on the budget the European Union allocates to external action. The financial perspectives are adopted for six-year periods and therefore it is not unusual to find mismatches between forecasts and needs that progressively arise. If there is anything that characterises the world fol- lowing the fall of the Berlin wall it is the speed of change a speed with which a budgetary system as enormously slow and complex as that of the European Union is ill equipped to keep pace. The debate proposed by the Presidency was aimed at attempting to identify necessary chang- es in the expense lines in order to boost the effectiveness of the Union’s external action. Few debates could be closer to reality than the one on income and expenditure. It does not lend itself to grand declarations of intent or of philosophical principles. That is why I am mentioning it in this introduction. It can provide a very useful focus for the policy to which the present Cuaderno de Estrategia is devoted. — 11 — Introduction The first of the shared basic assumptions is found in the title itself. It stemmed from an apparently undisputable statement: the European Union, as such, is an actor in international relations. And not only this it is also global in scope. Its prominence and influence are not limited to its geographical area taken in its broadest sense, but extend to the farthest corner of the planet. Not so long ago an assertion of this kind would have triggered not only a few raised brows but a swarm of protests, denials and motions for rejection. It still triggers some, but as we shall see and several of the contributing authors examine in detail, it is more a problem of terminology and preconceived ideas than one of substance. A second point of departure in the exercise launched by the Presi- dency was a set of reasons —once again, not considered controversial— why the Union should strive to be more effective as a global actor. It is worth listing some of these reasons and subsequently reflecting on them. A word of warning before reading them: they are drafted by a Presidency which has never concealed its «pragmatic» vision of the building of Eu- rope, far removed from any «federalist» flight of fancy. The interests of the Member States —economic, environmental and security— have never been so closely linked as they are now to those of the rest of the world, and this trend will only grow stronger. We must therefore maximise the ability of the EU, on the one hand, to exercise in- fluence on a truly global scale and, on the other, to multiply the individual interests of the Member States. We must all exploit our belonging to a large and capable regional bloc. The EU is firmly placed to contribute to the development of interna- tional peace and security, having at its disposal for this purpose a unique range of instruments of action. The Union is often perceived as an effec- tive intermediary with the possibility of playing a credible and construc- tive role in situations of instability and conflict. Our objective should be the establishment of an effective international system headed by the United Nations. A more effective EU can become a credible and useful partner to the UN and other multinational organisa- tions. In a world of complex threats and challenges, internal and external security are increasingly interrelated. External efforts have a major and long-term impact on internal security. Together with this, Community policies and first— and third-pillar decisions are having more and more — 12 — Enrique Mora Benavente influence on the foreign-policy interests of the Member States. For ex- ample, European policy on climate change will be a determining factor in relations with China, while immigration policies have a major impact on northern Africa and the Sahel region. Added to these reflections were others which were more specific and therefore less relevant to what this book sets out to underline: the idea that nowadays all the European Union Member States consider, without the slightest reservation in principle, that the Union as an in- ternational actor is distinct and different from the twenty-seven actors who make it up. However, that all the Member States regard the Union as an actor in its own right does not mean to say that they share the same concept of what this means. On the contrary, there are various different concepts perhaps not twenty-seven, but certainly a number of diverse ideas that coexist within the Union. The topics of debate transcribed above give a fairly close idea of one of these concepts—that of the Swedish Presidency, the author of the re- flection document. Let us take the first element. The point of departure is the state, not the Union. The concern is national interest —whether eco- nomic, environmental or security— not a hypothetical common interest. One concludes from this premise that the Union can be useful in helping us maximise our individual capacity to influence. And the last sentence starkly reveals the underlying idea: «We must all exploit our belonging to a large and capable regional bloc» (the italics are mine). Rarely will read- ers find a more succinct and more precise expression of the utilitarianism concept of the building of Europe. The fourth element elaborates on this approach. Once again, the main concern is the security of the state considered individually. In this case, it is a broad concept of security which includes not only traditional exter- nal threats but also how they affect internal security. And once again the reflection on the influence of Union action on this security, in this case indirectly. It is a quite a particular reflection: the Union acts on policies within its powers (the first and, to a lesser extent, the third pillar) and this action arouses international reactions, from third states and international organisations, which can affect my security as a Member State. Once again the approach is radically localist, and from this viewpoint, from a seamless perspective of national interests, one arrives at the conclusion that this is how the Union should act. — 13 — Introduction The other two elements illustrate the more widespread conception of the objectives the Union should pursue in its action in the world: to work to promote international peace and security. That is all very well, of course. What does not seem so reasonable is it that it should be only that. This conception, despite its evident altruism and elevation view- point, is deeply reductionist. There is something that does not tally if the Union’s sole strategic objective is the same as that of many non-govern- mental organisations. Though to many this is a commonplace beyond all doubt. It is highly revealing that it should appear in the document we are examining—after all, it is an internal document intended to fuel a debate, not for public consumption. We may draw at least three conclusions from these elements dis- cussed: a) First, that even the most limiting vision of the European project con- siders the Union, as such, to be an international actor. b) Second, that it has goals to meet and interests to defend.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JAPCC Annual Report 2019
    2019 annual REPORT Joint Air Power Competence Centre Joint Air Power www.japcc.org Competence Centre Cover picture: Satellite: © ESA /AOES Medialab; Earth: © 2012 EUMETSAT; Background: © StarLine /shutterstock © This work is copyrighted. All Inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected] Disclaimer This publication is a product of the JAPCC. It does not represent the opinions or policies of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and is designed to provide an independent overview, analysis, food for thought and recommendations regarding a possible way ahead on the subject. Release This document is releasable to the Public. Portions of the document may be quoted without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. Published and distributed by The Joint Air Power Competence Centre von­Seydlitz­Kaserne Römerstraße 140 47546 Kalkar Germany Telephone: +49 (0) 2824 90 2201 Facsimile: +49 (0) 2824 90 2208 E­Mail: [email protected] Website: www.japcc.org Denotes images digitally manipulated Follow us on Social Media JAPCC | annual REPORT 2019 1 foreword Today, NATO Air Forces stand on the verge of the at the peer­to­peer level. We must use the lessons most meaningful transformation of technology and learned from this and other exercises to evolve our capability in our history, a transformation which con­ Alliance into a connected, Joint All Domain fighting tinues to be enabled in part by the independent force that is agile and capable of acting at speed that thought and analysis from the recognized air and future conflicts will require. I have great confidence space power experts in the Joint Air Power Compe­ that our Nations and our people will work closely with tence Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union: Where Is It Now?
    Duquesne Law Review Volume 34 Number 4 Conference Proceedings: The Duquesne University School of Law Instititue for Judicial Education's and the Supreme Court of Article 9 Pennsylvania Conference on Science and the Law 1996 The European Union: Where Is It Now? John P. Flaherty Maureen E. Lally-Green Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John P. Flaherty & Maureen E. Lally-Green, The European Union: Where Is It Now?, 34 Duq. L. Rev. 923 (1996). Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol34/iss4/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Duquesne Law Review by an authorized editor of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. The European Union: Where is it Now? Hon. John P. Flaherty* Maureen E. Lally-Green** TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................. 926 Part One: A Brief History Lesson .............. 927 A. The Late 1940's through 1958 ............. 928 1. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GAAT) (1947) ..................... 928 2. Benelux Customs Convention (1948) ...... 928 3. Council of Europe (1948) ............... 929 4. Organization for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC) (1948) ............ 930 * BA Duquesne University; J.D. University of Pittsburgh; Justice, the Su- preme Court of Pennsylvania (to be elevated to the position of Chief Justice of Penn- sylvania, July 1996). ** B.S. Duquesne University; J.D. Duquesne University; Professor of Law, Duquesne University School of Law. Both authors have been instrumental in the development of an academic pro- gram between the Duquesne University School of Law and the Law School of Uni- versity College Dublin in Dublin, Ireland on the topic of the law of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Development of European Integration
    FACT SHEETS ON THE EUROPEAN UNION The historical development of European integration PE 618.969 1. The First Treaties.....................................................................................................3 2. Developments up to the Single European Act.........................................................6 3. The Maastricht and Amsterdam Treaties...............................................................10 4. The Treaty of Nice and the Convention on the Future of Europe..........................14 5. The Treaty of Lisbon..............................................................................................18 EN - 18/06/2018 ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This leaflet contains a compilation of Fact Sheets provided by Parliament’s Policy Departments and Economic Governance Support Unit on the relevant policy area. The Fact Sheets are updated regularly and published on the website of the European Parliament: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets ABOUT THE PUBLISHER Author of the publication: European Parliament Department responsible: Unit for Coordination of Editorial and Communication Activities E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in June, 2018 © European Union, 2018 DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice
    [Show full text]
  • HQ Eurocorps
    26th Feb. 2015 Brussels Subcommittee on Security and Defence Lieutenant-general BUCHSENSCHMIDT Commander Eurocorps EUROCORPS, a tool for the European Union, NATO and UN Use it or lose it ! 1 EUROCORPS is an Army Corps Headquarters: Similar to its sister HRF HQs but also Unique in its kind Has reached a turning point in its existence. 2 CENTRAL LOCATION WITHIN HRF COMMUNITY 3 RAPIDLY DEPLOYABLE OPERATIONAL NRF 7 NRF 15 A UNIQUE STATUS 1992, La Rochelle : a political will Directly subordinated to CHODs and POL DIR 2009, Treaty of Strasbourg : Financial and legal autonomy A UNIQUE SUBORDINATION Common Committee (CoCo) Auditing Air Committee Eurocorps Committee Committee (AUDITCOM) (ECC) (ACEC) Naval Budget & Coordination Financial Info Info Board Committee (NCB) (BFC) ANs ANs Security Info Committee ANs Expert Groups (ECSC) HQ EC ECSAB Resources Board EC HQ Board A UNIQUE GEOGRAPHICAL SITUATION European Parliament A European capital Council of Europe European Court of Human Rights Strasbourg Higher education center National School of Administration (ENA) University of Strasbourg Institute of Political Studies (IEP) Council of Europe 8 Force structure Total Eurocorps: Permanent XXX +/- 1100 HQ 400 X MN 700 MNCS MN II I I HQSPT Signal CIS MN DEU MN X DEU/FRA FGB Other TCN 5 000 Privileged Force generated Capabilities 9 A UNIQUE MULTINATIONAL STRUCTURE 5 6 Framework Nations Germany Belgium France Luxembourg Spain • Mastered multinationality • Responsibility and burden sharing • Lower cost for each nation 3 Associated Nations AN ENHANCED MULTINATIONALITY
    [Show full text]
  • Death of an Institution: the End for Western European Union, a Future
    DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? EGMONT PAPER 46 DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? ALYSON JK BAILES AND GRAHAM MESSERVY-WHITING May 2011 The Egmont Papers are published by Academia Press for Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations. Founded in 1947 by eminent Belgian political leaders, Egmont is an independent think-tank based in Brussels. Its interdisciplinary research is conducted in a spirit of total academic freedom. A platform of quality information, a forum for debate and analysis, a melting pot of ideas in the field of international politics, Egmont’s ambition – through its publications, seminars and recommendations – is to make a useful contribution to the decision- making process. *** President: Viscount Etienne DAVIGNON Director-General: Marc TRENTESEAU Series Editor: Prof. Dr. Sven BISCOP *** Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations Address Naamsestraat / Rue de Namur 69, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone 00-32-(0)2.223.41.14 Fax 00-32-(0)2.223.41.16 E-mail [email protected] Website: www.egmontinstitute.be © Academia Press Eekhout 2 9000 Gent Tel. 09/233 80 88 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.academiapress.be J. Story-Scientia NV Wetenschappelijke Boekhandel Sint-Kwintensberg 87 B-9000 Gent Tel. 09/225 57 57 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.story.be All authors write in a personal capacity. Lay-out: proxess.be ISBN 978 90 382 1785 7 D/2011/4804/136 U 1612 NUR1 754 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • European Air Group Un Decennio Di Interoperabilità
    Cooperazione internazionale European Air Group Un decennio di interoperabilità Sebastiano Franco varie Nazioni in tale contesto potrà permettere di porre a fattor comune, con maggiore efficacia, sia le capacità operative sia quelle logistiche e di conseguenza ridurre lo l crescente impegno delle Forze Armate in operazio- sforzo economico della singola Nazione. ni multinazionali, nella maggior parte dei casi in aree In tale quadro si inserisce l’European Air Group di High lontane dai confini nazionali, comporta una continua e Wycombe (UK) la cui missione è di “migliorare le capa- Isempre maggiore capacità di operare congiuntamente tra cità operative delle Aeronautiche dei Paesi membri per le varie componenti operative delle Nazioni im- condurre operazioni che perseguono interessi pegnate in tali operazioni. Di fatto diventa una comuni, principalmente attraverso meccanismi necessità imprescindibile in considerazione che accrescono l’interoperabilità”. anche dei notevoli tagli di bilancio nel comparto Difesa nella maggior parte degli Stati europei, Le origini nonostante i numerosi impegni operativi che, Durante la prima Guerra del Golfo (1991) l’Ae- verosimilmente, saranno mantenuti pressoché ronautica Militare francese e quella britannica si inalterati.Tale intensità, in termini di impegni ope- sono trovate ad operare congiuntamente senza rativi, potrà pertanto essere mantenuta concentrando avere però alla base un addestramento comune. Tale ogni possibile sforzo anche nella ricerca della più spinta situazione si è ripetuta in seguito durante il periodo iniziale interoperabilità, da intendersi nel suo significato più ampio delle operazioni nei Balcani. Sulla scorta di tali esperien- del termine, includendo non soltanto gli aspetti tecnici ma ze i governi dei due Paesi decisero, durante il summit di anche quelli procedurali ed umani (addestramento, lingua, Chartres nel 1994, di dare vita ad una organizzazione che, ecc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Getting There: Building Strategic Mobility Into ESDP Occasional Papers
    Occasional Papers November 2002 n°38 Katia Vlachos-Dengler Getting there: building strategic mobility into ESDP published by the European Union Institute for Security Studies 43 avenue du Président Wilson F-75775 Paris cedex 16 phone: + 33 (0) 1 56 89 19 30 fax: + 33 (0) 1 56 89 19 31 e-mail: [email protected] www.iss-eu.org In January 2002 the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) became a Paris-based autonomous agency of the European Union. Following an EU Council Joint Action of 20 July 2001, it is now an integral part of the new structures that will support the further development of the CFSP/ESDP. The Institute’s core mission is to provide analyses and recommendations that can be of use and relevance to the formulation of EU policies. In carrying out that mission, it also acts as an interface between experts and decision-makers at all levels. The EUISS is the successor to the WEU Institute for Security Studies, set up in 1990 by the WEU Council to foster and stimulate a wider discussion across Europe. Occasional Papers are essays or reports that the Institute considers should be made avail- able as a contribution to the debate on topical issues relevant to European security. They may be based on work carried out by researchers granted awards by the ISS, on contribu- tions prepared by external experts, and on collective research projects or other activities organised by (or with the support of) the Institute. They reflect the views of their authors, not those of the Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Briefs
    Rethinking EU Crisis Management From Battlegroups to a European Legion? Niklas Nováky Summary June 2020 This paper discusses an idea to create a European Legion that has been put forward by Radoslaw Sikorski, MEP. This would be a new kind of EU military unit, made up of volunteers rather than national contingents contributed by the member states. The idea stems from Sikorski’s desire to reform the EU’s existing battlegroups, which have been operational for 15 years but have never been used, despite numerous opportunities. The paper argues that although the EU’s 2007 Lisbon Treaty imposes heavy restrictions on the Union’s ability to deploy military force, it does not rule out conducting operations with a volunteer force. At the same time, a volunteer-based European Legion force would have to be created initially by a group of member states outside the EU framework. These states could then make it available to the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy as, for example, a permanent battlegroup. An existing model would be the multinational Eurocorps. Keywords CSDP – Crisis management – Battlegroups – European Legion – European Council – Eurocorps 1 Introduction Since the EU’s Common (formerly European) Security and Defence Policy (ESDP/CSDP) became operational in 2003, the Union has launched a total of 13 military operations within its framework. Of these, eight have been executive in character, meaning that they were authorised to use force if this had been deemed necessary to fulfil their mandate. The most recent CSDP military operation is Operation IRINI in the Mediterranean, which the EU launched on 31 March 2020 to help enforce the UN’s arms embargo on Libya.
    [Show full text]
  • FOREWORD It Is an Honour for Me to Present This Compendium Which
    FOREWORD FOREWORD It is an honour for me to present this compendium which includes papers, practical information and proposals for combating fraud and corruption based on experience of the Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) in Central, Eastern Europe and Asia. The book was prepared upon the results of the EUROSAI International Conference “The Role of Supreme Audit Institutions in Fighting Against Fraud and Corruption” hosted by the Accounting Chamber of Ukraine on September 1921, 2006 in Kyiv. The EUROSAI event was attended by 61 participants from 24 SAIs among which were present Presidents of 16 SAIs. The participants discussed the following subthemes: • Subtheme I: The Role of SAIs in the National System Development of Fighting Against Fraud and Corruption; • Subtheme II: Peculiarities of SAIs Cooperation with the Law Enforcement Bodies during Exposure and Prevention of Fraud and Corruption; • Subtheme III: The Practice of SAIs in Implementation Transparency and Publicity in the Field of Fighting Against Fraud and Corruption. The Conference was supported by the Parliament of Ukraine, the Cabinet of Ministries of Ukraine and by the number of Ukrainian government authorities which participated in this event. I would like to pass special thanks to all of my colleagues, Heads of the SAIs for their interest in the Conference and willingness to share experience and modern techniques in fighting against fraud and corruption. I am very pleased that the initiative of the Accounting Chamber of Ukraine received great feedback among the EUROSAI community. I am deeply convinced that this event stimulated and consolidated efficient collaboration between SAIs and that approved Recommendations will further facilitate applying common actions towards combating such negative phenomena as fraud and corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union
    SYLLABUS OF THE COURSE NAME OF THE COURSE 1. COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION FIELD OF SCIENCE 2. POLITICAL SCIENCE AND ADMINISTRATION LANGUAGE OF TUITION 3. ENGLISH UNIT OFFERING THE COURSE 4. THE CHAIR OF EUROPEAN STUDIES CODE OF THE COURSE 5. 26-ES-S2-E2-CFaSP TYPE OF THE COURSE 6. OBLIGATORY FIELD OF STUDIES (SPECIALISATION) 7. European Studies, (Regional Policy) 8. TYPE OF STUDIES MASTER YEAR OF STUDIES 9. 1 YEAR SEMESTER 10. SPRING MODE OF STUDIES 11. DISCUSSION SESSION 30 HOURS 12. PRELIMINARY REQUIREMENTS The workshop requires students to have basic knowledge of the institutional and legal framework of the European Union, contemporary international relations and political geography. Basic knowledge of the modern history of Europe and its direct neighborhood is recommended. Student should be able to work in teams and to perform critical analysis of a text. AIMS OF THE COURSE: The aim of the course is to learn students about the institutional framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy, its mechanisms, programmes, initiatives. The course presents a theoretical approach to security studies and foreign policy as well as the historical development of the CFSP The course discloses several case studies related to the CFSP. Students learn how to evaluate the effectiveness of the CFSP of the EU, its strengths and weaknesses. Students apply various theoretical approaches (i.e. normative power Europe; geopolitics; intergovernmentalism) in critical debate on the 13. CFSP. COURSE CONTENTS 1) Introduction to the course 2) Foreign policy and security policy – theoretical approach; the essence of notion; foreign policy at the level of international organization 3) The European Union as a global actor – unfulfilled promise? What kind of actor? Toward the strategic sovereignty? Normative power Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 May Veliko Tarnovo 4Th CSDP Olympiad Booklet.Pdf
    4th COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY OLYMPIAD Residential phase, 21 - 25 May 2018 at Vasil Levski NMU, Veliko Tarnovo, under the auspices of the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union and the European Security and Defence College, Brussels, Belgium Publication of the Vasil Levski National Military University Editor: Colonel Prof. Dr. Veselin MADANSKI, Colonel Assoc. Prof. Nevena ATANASOVA - KRASTEVA, PhD Language Editor: Senior Instructor Marina RAYKOVA Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented in this booklet are solely those of the authors. © Vasil Levski National Military University, Veliko Tarnovo, BULGARIA, 2018 ISBN 978-954-753-278-6 2 CONTENTS Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... 3 History of the CSDP Olympiad ................................................................................ 5 History of the Vasil Levski NMU, Veliko Tarnovo ........................................... 8 OPENING CEREMONY SPEECHES ....................................................................... 10 Speech of the Deputy-Minister of the Bulgarian Presidency of the EU Council ................................................................................................................ 10 CSDP Olympiad 2018 – Speech of the Chairman of the IG .......................... 13 Speech of the Head of the ESDC ............................................................................. 15 Speech of the Minister of Defence ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The European Security and Defence Policy
    TTHEHE FEDERALFEDERAL TRUSTTRUST foreducation&research enlightening the debate on good governance EuropeanPolicyBrief Apr 2006 • Issue 26 • The Federal Trust, 7 Graphite Square, Vauxhall Walk, London SE11 5EE • www.fedtrust.co.uk The European Security and Defence Policy Introduction Established at the Cologne European Council in June 1999, the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) has, in the 7 years since its inception, given rise to countless debates and discussions. Whereas some commentators regard the ESDP as an overall success story, others voice doubts. The current discussion about whether the EU should send peacekeeping troops to the Democratic Republic of Congo during elections this June seems to crystallise these doubts. Only three EU member states would be capable of leading such a mission, and two of them, France and the United Kingdom, are currently unwilling and unable to mount an international deployment because of their respective involvement in Iraq and the Ivory Coast. After months of discussion, Germany eventually agreed at the EU External Affairs Council on 20 March 2006 to lead the military operation to the Congo from headquarters in Potsdam. Nevertheless, opposition to a Congo mission is still strong in Berlin, with considerable scepticism even within the governing parties. It is still unclear whether the German government will be able muster enough votes in the Bundestag (which has a right of veto on the mission) to send soldiers to Congo. Such uncertainty is not calculated to increase Europe’s standing and military credibility in the world. On the other hand, the European Security and Defence Policy has undoubted successes to its credit.
    [Show full text]