DOCSLIB.ORG

No. 207 October 4 2019 a New EU Commissioner for Space And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
No. 207 October 4 2019 a New EU Commissioner for Space And No. 207 October 4th 2019 A new EU Commissioner for space and defence. The EU has created a new defence and space arm to help fund, develop and deploy armed forces. Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen named an ally of French President Emmanuel Macron for the role. Sylvie Goulard, who will be responsible for the new directorate general, as commissioner for industrial policy and, in what increasingly seems to be par for the course, she was interviewed by French police recently in a case involving misuse of EU funds. She currently risks being rejected by the EU Parliament after a brutal hearing that focused on these improprieties. Read more here Please join our protest. Lunchtime: 13:00 on Tuesday 8th October outside Dáil Eireann, Kildare St. The TDs have returned from their summer break and it is important to reassure those who rejected PESCO that there is still opposition and that it is consistent, just as it is equally important to show those who supported it that we haven’t gone away. Please join us. The EU and its embrace of the arms industry. EU policy-makers see themselves as champions of the ‘defence industry’, and arms manufacturers and weapons-dealers have long held formal and informal seats at the decision-making table. The details and dealings of this cosy relationship are kept secret from the public, even as growing amounts of public money is given to the arms industry - money which could better serve social and environmental goals in Europe, and beyond. Read more here Click here. The EU Service (Army), should be seen as a sort of Erasmus but in the military/civilian field. The EU Service (Army), should be seen as a sort of Erasmus but in the military/civilian field according to a recent paper from Finabel. It would offer to young people the possibility to discover different EU countries while engaging in Security and Defence activities. Again, as for the suggested National Conscription Model, European Service should offer three possibilities, namely “European Security and Defence Studies”, a “European Military Service” and the third option could be the already existing “European Voluntary Service”. Here is the link to Part 4 of this paper which is the most interesting. Finabel is another of those EU Armies – in - waiting! The NATO School! In response to a recent Dáil question, Minister of State for Defence Paul Kehoe stated the following in his reply: In addition to training provided in Ireland, the Defence Forces have ongoing opportunities to avail of training techniques and facilities available to other forces throughout Europe. They attend training courses run by the following organisations:- - NATO School Oberammergau - Associated Centres of Excellence (COEs) - Partner Training and Education Centres (PTECs); and, The NATO School Oberammergau (NSO) conducts education and training in support of current and developing NATO operations, strategy, policy, doctrine and procedures. Here is the course catalogue in case you’re interested – there’s a broad range to choose from! As for CEOs and PTECs, any information would be appreciated. Interestingly, it would seem that there was no response in the Dáil to this statement but it is indicative of how we are being dragged closer and closer to an EU Army that will constitute a pillar of NATO. The Eurogroup: a secret government within the EU! The Eurogroup, the finance ministers of the euro zone states, is the body that takes the decisions in the policy areas of monetary union and regulation of the euro zone. Unbelievably, with such an important function, it is a purely informal body with no legal basis whatsoever. There are no rules of procedure and no minutes of meetings. The sovereign debt crisis in the southern euro states and Ireland several years ago turned it into an anti-democratic monster. Read more here An EU Empire!!! Guy Verhofstadt who served as the Leader of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe(ALDE) from 2009 to 2019, and has served as an MEP from Belgium since 2009, has praised the new “world order” of “empires” during the recent Liberal Democrat conference. “The world order of tomorrow is not a world order based on nation-states, on countries — it’s a world order that is based on empires”, claimed the former prime minister of Belgium — which for its own part has a singularly unpleasant history as an imperial power. Fianna Fáil has been a member of ALDE since 2009 and can only be assumed to agree with its leader’s sentiments. Read more here Managing migration becomes a ‘way of life.’ When EU Commission President von der Leyen announced would become Vice President of the Commission for “Protecting Our European Way of Life,” there were puzzled faces all around. It means managing migration, Ms. von der Leyen clarified. One critical way the EU has managed migration over the past five years, in a bid to stop thousands from arriving at its shores, has been paying Turkey and other countries to keep migrants away. Asked if she would renew the Turkey deal, which has cost the EU taxpayer a massive €6 billion, especially after noting that Turkey didn’t share EU values at another point in her presentation, von der Leyen sidestepped. “We will see,” she said. EU Parliament propagates a travesty of history. On September 18, the EU Parliament voted by 535 votes to 66 to support a resolution with the seemingly innocuous title, “On the Importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe.” Only the European United Left/Nordic Green Left voted against it. The motion, largely sponsored by the conservative group, attempts to wholly rewrite the history of the Second World War. In the resolution, complete equivalence is drawn between Communism and Nazism. Both were equally to blame for the World War 2. Read more here Neutrality and EU membership. When we consider Irish neutrality, we must remember the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty. The main ones containing military measures are outlined below and lead to an inescapable conclusion; Ministers and the Taoiseach are talking rubbish when they talk about our continuing policy of neutrality and, if we are to re-establish our neutrality and avoid participation in and contributing to the creation of an EU Army under Franco-German control, we will have to leave the EU. Read more here The EU’s maritime reach and Ireland’s role. The growing role of the European Union as a maritime security provider not only in Europe, but further away, in the Indian ocean and Asia-Pacific was discussed recently by EU defense ministers in Helsinki.. Frederica Mogherini, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, said the EU sees a growing role in maritime security not only in Europe, but further away, in the Indian ocean and Asia-Pacific. Perhaps that’s why the government has put out to tender a multi-role ship which will cost in excess of €0.25bn? In reply to a Dáil question, the Taoiseach said: “The vessel will provide a flexible and adaptive capability for a wide range of maritime tasks both at home and overseas.” The ship can carry a battalion of soldiers and landing craft to put them ashore as well as helicopter support. It’s hardly intended for rescue missions off the coast of Donegal! Read more here “Such a parcel of rogues” in a Commission? On 26 September MEPs in the EU Parliament’s legal affairs committee agreed to block Commissioners-designate Laszlo Trocsanyi, from Hungary, and Rovana Plumb, from Romania, from passing on to the hearings stage. This is the first time that MEPs had the power to block individual candidates but the next steps are unclear. Many of the 26 commissioner candidates put forward by national governments and agreed to by President-elect Von der Leyen have caused concern. At least three are currently the focus of open investigations from police or anti-fraud bodies for misuse of public funds and corruption, and another has been shielded from investigations. Read more here Book review: A world safe for capitalism! The book, Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neo-Liberalism (Harvard University Press 2018) by historian Quinn Slobodian is likely to upset enthusiasts of the “liberal world order”.” Slobodian tells the story of how a small set of intellectuals in central Europe laid the ideological foundations of institutions such as the European Union and the World Trade Organization (WTO), commonly held up today as bulwarks of liberal democracy. Read more here EuroCorps: an EU Army in waiting. It is important at the outset to state that the EuroCorps is presently not established at the EU level under the Common Security and Defence Policy, CSDP). But, most importantly, EuroCorps and its assets may contribute in the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy when made available as a multinational force in accordance with Article 42.3 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU). So, when called upon, it could constitute an EU Army and a formidable one at that! Read more here The inception of the EU military – industrial complex. On Jan. 17, 1961, in his final speech from the White House, President Dwight Eisenhower gave the American nation a dire warning about what he described as a threat to democratic government. He called it the military-industrial complex, a formidable union of defense contractors, government and the armed forces and warned that it would take resources from other areas -- such as building schools and hospitals. Read more here What future for Irish Rail? Ireland has been urged by the EU Commission to implement the Fourth Railway Package.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HQ Eurocorps
    26th Feb. 2015 Brussels Subcommittee on Security and Defence Lieutenant-general BUCHSENSCHMIDT Commander Eurocorps EUROCORPS, a tool for the European Union, NATO and UN Use it or lose it ! 1 EUROCORPS is an Army Corps Headquarters: Similar to its sister HRF HQs but also Unique in its kind Has reached a turning point in its existence. 2 CENTRAL LOCATION WITHIN HRF COMMUNITY 3 RAPIDLY DEPLOYABLE OPERATIONAL NRF 7 NRF 15 A UNIQUE STATUS 1992, La Rochelle : a political will Directly subordinated to CHODs and POL DIR 2009, Treaty of Strasbourg : Financial and legal autonomy A UNIQUE SUBORDINATION Common Committee (CoCo) Auditing Air Committee Eurocorps Committee Committee (AUDITCOM) (ECC) (ACEC) Naval Budget & Coordination Financial Info Info Board Committee (NCB) (BFC) ANs ANs Security Info Committee ANs Expert Groups (ECSC) HQ EC ECSAB Resources Board EC HQ Board A UNIQUE GEOGRAPHICAL SITUATION European Parliament A European capital Council of Europe European Court of Human Rights Strasbourg Higher education center National School of Administration (ENA) University of Strasbourg Institute of Political Studies (IEP) Council of Europe 8 Force structure Total Eurocorps: Permanent XXX +/- 1100 HQ 400 X MN 700 MNCS MN II I I HQSPT Signal CIS MN DEU MN X DEU/FRA FGB Other TCN 5 000 Privileged Force generated Capabilities 9 A UNIQUE MULTINATIONAL STRUCTURE 5 6 Framework Nations Germany Belgium France Luxembourg Spain • Mastered multinationality • Responsibility and burden sharing • Lower cost for each nation 3 Associated Nations AN ENHANCED MULTINATIONALITY
    [Show full text]
  • Death of an Institution: the End for Western European Union, a Future
    DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? EGMONT PAPER 46 DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? ALYSON JK BAILES AND GRAHAM MESSERVY-WHITING May 2011 The Egmont Papers are published by Academia Press for Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations. Founded in 1947 by eminent Belgian political leaders, Egmont is an independent think-tank based in Brussels. Its interdisciplinary research is conducted in a spirit of total academic freedom. A platform of quality information, a forum for debate and analysis, a melting pot of ideas in the field of international politics, Egmont’s ambition – through its publications, seminars and recommendations – is to make a useful contribution to the decision- making process. *** President: Viscount Etienne DAVIGNON Director-General: Marc TRENTESEAU Series Editor: Prof. Dr. Sven BISCOP *** Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations Address Naamsestraat / Rue de Namur 69, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone 00-32-(0)2.223.41.14 Fax 00-32-(0)2.223.41.16 E-mail [email protected] Website: www.egmontinstitute.be © Academia Press Eekhout 2 9000 Gent Tel. 09/233 80 88 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.academiapress.be J. Story-Scientia NV Wetenschappelijke Boekhandel Sint-Kwintensberg 87 B-9000 Gent Tel. 09/225 57 57 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.story.be All authors write in a personal capacity. Lay-out: proxess.be ISBN 978 90 382 1785 7 D/2011/4804/136 U 1612 NUR1 754 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Briefs
    Rethinking EU Crisis Management From Battlegroups to a European Legion? Niklas Nováky Summary June 2020 This paper discusses an idea to create a European Legion that has been put forward by Radoslaw Sikorski, MEP. This would be a new kind of EU military unit, made up of volunteers rather than national contingents contributed by the member states. The idea stems from Sikorski’s desire to reform the EU’s existing battlegroups, which have been operational for 15 years but have never been used, despite numerous opportunities. The paper argues that although the EU’s 2007 Lisbon Treaty imposes heavy restrictions on the Union’s ability to deploy military force, it does not rule out conducting operations with a volunteer force. At the same time, a volunteer-based European Legion force would have to be created initially by a group of member states outside the EU framework. These states could then make it available to the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy as, for example, a permanent battlegroup. An existing model would be the multinational Eurocorps. Keywords CSDP – Crisis management – Battlegroups – European Legion – European Council – Eurocorps 1 Introduction Since the EU’s Common (formerly European) Security and Defence Policy (ESDP/CSDP) became operational in 2003, the Union has launched a total of 13 military operations within its framework. Of these, eight have been executive in character, meaning that they were authorised to use force if this had been deemed necessary to fulfil their mandate. The most recent CSDP military operation is Operation IRINI in the Mediterranean, which the EU launched on 31 March 2020 to help enforce the UN’s arms embargo on Libya.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union
    SYLLABUS OF THE COURSE NAME OF THE COURSE 1. COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION FIELD OF SCIENCE 2. POLITICAL SCIENCE AND ADMINISTRATION LANGUAGE OF TUITION 3. ENGLISH UNIT OFFERING THE COURSE 4. THE CHAIR OF EUROPEAN STUDIES CODE OF THE COURSE 5. 26-ES-S2-E2-CFaSP TYPE OF THE COURSE 6. OBLIGATORY FIELD OF STUDIES (SPECIALISATION) 7. European Studies, (Regional Policy) 8. TYPE OF STUDIES MASTER YEAR OF STUDIES 9. 1 YEAR SEMESTER 10. SPRING MODE OF STUDIES 11. DISCUSSION SESSION 30 HOURS 12. PRELIMINARY REQUIREMENTS The workshop requires students to have basic knowledge of the institutional and legal framework of the European Union, contemporary international relations and political geography. Basic knowledge of the modern history of Europe and its direct neighborhood is recommended. Student should be able to work in teams and to perform critical analysis of a text. AIMS OF THE COURSE: The aim of the course is to learn students about the institutional framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy, its mechanisms, programmes, initiatives. The course presents a theoretical approach to security studies and foreign policy as well as the historical development of the CFSP The course discloses several case studies related to the CFSP. Students learn how to evaluate the effectiveness of the CFSP of the EU, its strengths and weaknesses. Students apply various theoretical approaches (i.e. normative power Europe; geopolitics; intergovernmentalism) in critical debate on the 13. CFSP. COURSE CONTENTS 1) Introduction to the course 2) Foreign policy and security policy – theoretical approach; the essence of notion; foreign policy at the level of international organization 3) The European Union as a global actor – unfulfilled promise? What kind of actor? Toward the strategic sovereignty? Normative power Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of European Defence
    Making sense of European defence Margriet Drent Clingendael Report Eric Wilms Dick Zandee Making sense of European defence Margriet Drent Eric Wilms Dick Zandee Clingendael report December 2017 This Report has been commissioned by the Netherlands Ministry of Defence. Responsibility for the contents and for the opinions expressed rests solely with the authors; publication does not constitute an endorsement by the Netherlands Ministry of Defence. Chapter 3 of this Clingendael report has been delivered by The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies. December 2017 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: © European Parliament / Flickr Unauthorised use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non-commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non-commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorised use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Origins-Of-Finabel-03.12-1-1.Pdf
    This paper was drawn up by Georges Clementz under the supervision and guidance of Mr Mario Blokken, Director of the Permanent Secretariat. This Food for Thought paper is a document that gives an initial reflection on the theme. The content is not reflecting the positions of the member states but consists of elements that can initiate and feed the discussions and analyses in the domain of the theme. All our studies are available on www.finabel.org THE ORIGINS OF FINABEL (1953–1957) In the wake of the Second World War, Euro- peans quickly became aware of the dilemma they faced concerning their collective secu- rity, namely the balance between autonomy and dependence - fate and freedom of ac- tion1. The debate over European cooperation and subordination of European defence to the Atlantic defence structure is thus old. It dates back to the first years of the Cold War with the creation of NATO in 1949. Even though the idea of a European defence took shape with the Treaty of Brussels (1948), the European Defence Community (1950) and then the Western European Union (1954), European security would remain, through- du Finabel” -“Blason Wikipedia out the Cold War, under the umbrella of the United States, in a confrontation with Rus- sia based on “mutually assured destruction”. better interoperability, non-duplication, and These various defence cooperation initiatives better efficiency in defence, balanced between were essential for countering the Soviet threat the Atlantic and the European logics and, in and are at the very core of the debate previ- fine, of major importance regarding strategic ously mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Summit Guide Brussels, 11-12 July 2018
    NATO Summit Guide Brussels, 11-12 July 2018 A stronger and more agile Alliance The Brussels Summit comes at a crucial moment for the security of the North Atlantic Alliance. It will be an important opportunity to chart NATO’s path for the years ahead. In a changing world, NATO is adapting to be a more agile, responsive and innovative Alliance, while defending all of its members against any threat. NATO remains committed to fulfilling its three core tasks: collective defence, crisis management and cooperative security. At the Brussels Summit, the Alliance will make important decisions to further boost security in and around Europe, including through strengthened deterrence and defence, projecting stability and fighting terrorism, enhancing its partnership with the European Union, modernising the Alliance and achieving fairer burden-sharing. This Summit will be held in the new NATO Headquarters, a modern and sustainable home for a forward-looking Alliance. It will be the third meeting of Allied Heads of State and Government chaired by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. + Summit meetings + Member countries + Partners + NATO Secretary General Archived material – Information valid up to 10 July 2018 1 NATO Summit Guide, Brussels 2018 I. Strengthening deterrence and defence NATO’s primary purpose is to protect its almost one billion citizens and to preserve peace and freedom. NATO must also be vigilant against a wide range of new threats, be they in the form of computer code, disinformation or foreign fighters. The Alliance has taken important steps to strengthen its collective defence and deterrence, so that it can respond to threats from any direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurocorps' History Page 1 of 3
    EUROCORPS - Eurocorps' history Page 1 of 3 08/30/2005 - 03:16 pm Home Organisation Missions History Press Gallery Links Contact About us Eurocorps' history Eurocorps' history The origins Chronology of events Barracks The creation of the EUROCORPS can be seen as a logical consequence of the Elysée Treaty signed on January 22, 1963 (by President de Gaulle and Chancellor Adenauer). With this treaty, aimed at enhancing reconciliation between France and Germany, the two countries committed themselves to collaborate in the field of defence. Besides closer political consultation between the two countries, this also led to exchanges of personnel of the respective News armed forces and co-operation in the defence industry. Press releases Eurogazette 24 years later, in 1987, President Mitterrand and Chancellor Kohl decided to further improve military co-operation between France and Germany. They announced the creation of the French-German Security and Defence Council leading to the creation of the French-German Brigade in 1989. This major unit, comprising French and German units, ISAF VI has been operational since October 1991. On October 14, 1991, both heads of states informed the President of the European Council in a joint letter that they intended to further increase their military co-operation. This process was the basis for a Corps that would also be open to other WEU member states. On May 22, 1992, during the La Rochelle Summit the Joint Report of the French and German Defence Ministers was endorsed and François Mitterrand and Helmut Kohl formally founded the EUROCORPS. A few weeks later, on July 1, 1992, an implementation team arrived in Strasbourg to build up the Eurocorps Headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Future Seminar 2019
    NATO‘s Future Seminar 2019 Berlin | 9-12 November 2019 Co-sponsored by NATO PDD PANEL 1: Boon & Bane of Social Media in a Changing Communication Environment – How Should NATO (Re)Act? Whether a Tweet by Trump or a NATO Insta Story – political opinions and strategic information are available as easily and quickly as never before in the history of mankind. The boundaries between propaganda, lies and harsh reality are all too blurred. The exact assessment of what information is trustworthy in the context of security policy is of high relevance. Aggressive behavior or tactical maneuver, war or peace? These questions are answered with the right information. How this information is produced, used and received by the population is therefore vital to NATO's survival. PANEL 1: Boon & Bane of Social Media in a Changing Communication Environment – How Should NATO (Re)Act? Leaders PANEL 1: Social Media and NATO Leonhard Simon, Germany Alexander Schröder, Germany Project Manager, Staff Officer, Munich Security Conference Editor of the German Armed Forces Participants PANEL 1: Social Media and NATO Megan Burnham, USA Graduate Student of Russian and Tomas Kazulenas, Lithuania Eastern European Studies, Executive Director, Institute of Indiana University, Bloomington Democratic Politics, Vilnius Radu-Ion Gheorghe, Romania Virág Kemecsei, Hungary Communication & Research Intern, M.Sc. Conflict Resolution and Finabel European Army Governance Graduate Interoperability Centre, Brussels Participants PANEL 1: Social Media and NATO Doc. Dr. Aleksandar Nacev,
    [Show full text]
  • Enter the EU Battlegroups
    Chaillot Paper February 2007 n°97 Enter the EU Battlegroups Gustav Lindstrom cp97-cover.qxp 29/03/2007 16:09 Page 2 Chaillot Paper Paper Chaillot n° 97 In January 2002 the Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) became an autonomous Paris-based agency of the Enter the EU Battlegroups European Union. Following an EU Council Joint Action of 20 July 2001, it is now an integral part of the new structures that will support the further develop- ment of the CFSP/ESDP. The Institute’s core mission is to provide analyses and recommendations that can be of use and relevance to the formulation of the European security and defence policy. In carrying out that mission, it also acts as an interface between European experts and decision-makers at all levels. Chaillot Papers are monographs on topical questions written either by a member of the EUISS research team or by outside authors chosen and commissioned by the Institute. Early drafts are normally discussed at a semi- nar or study group of experts convened by the Institute and publication indicates that the paper is considered by the EUISS as a useful and authoritative contribution to the debate on CFSP/ESDP. Responsibility for the views expressed in them lies exclusively with authors. Gustav Lindstrom Chaillot Papers are also accessible via the Institute’s Website: www.iss.europa.eu cp97.qxp 29/03/2007 16:05 Page 1 Chaillot Paper February 2007 n°97 Enter the EU Battlegroups Gustav Lindstrom Institute for Security Studies European Union Paris cp97.qxp 29/03/2007 16:05 Page 2 Institute for Security Studies European Union 43 avenue du Président Wilson 75775 Paris cedex 16 tel.: +33 (0)1 56 89 19 30 fax: +33 (0)1 56 89 19 31 e-mail: [email protected] www.iss.europa.eu Director: Nicole Gnesotto © EU Institute for Security Studies 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Battalions to Brigades: the Future of European Defence
    Survival Global Politics and Strategy ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tsur20 Battalions to Brigades: The Future of European Defence Sven Biscop To cite this article: Sven Biscop (2020) Battalions to Brigades: The Future of European Defence, Survival, 62:5, 105-118, DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2020.1819654 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2020.1819654 Published online: 23 Sep 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tsur20 Battalions to Brigades: The Future of European Defence Sven Biscop There is no lack of initiatives to further defence cooperation between European states, but there might be a lack of ambition. Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), the new European Union mechanism launched in December 2017, could probably be described as the most promising scheme, but the participating states have so far explored only a fraction of its poten- tial. The risk is that it will yield but a small step forward, when much more is needed. Achieving inter-operability between Europe’s limited existing capabilities should not be the only goal: Europe’s defence effort must be truly integrated so as to increase capability. That means thinking big, includ- ing in terms of operations. Brigades, not companies or battalions, must be the building blocks of European defence. Thinking small During the Cold War, when European allies focused on territorial defence, the basic unit of NATO’s combined force structure was the army corps.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative European Defence System
    Food for thought 02-2019 Possibilities and Challenges to the Creation of a Cooperative European Defence System AN EXPERTISE FORUM CONTRIBUTING TO EUROPEAN CONTRIBUTING TO FORUM AN EXPERTISE SINCE 1953 ARMIES INTEROPERABILITY European Army Interoperability Center This paper was drawn up by M. Francesco Pettinari, European Defence Researcher, under the supervision and guidance of the Head of the Permanent Secretariat. This Food for Thought paper is a document that gives an initial reflection on the theme. The content is not reflecting the positions of the member states, but consists of elements that can initiate and feed the discussions and analyses in the domain of the theme. It was drafted by the Permanent Secretariat of Finabel. INTRODUCTION The European security environment has been sented by an approach to military cooperation subject to a large amount of changes within among countries which has the potential to the last two decades. For this reason, the crea- be a ‘game changer’ for the future of Europe- tion of a structured European defence system an defence. NATO launched this initiative in has become a primary necessity for Europe- 2014: The Framework Nations’ Concept. an states. Being involved in a highly volatile security environment and facing a myriad of This paper aims to give an overview of the economic, political, and practical problems, current status of the cooperative system for European countries started to understand guaranteeing European security and defence, that the only way to form a structure that addressing the essential requirements for the could give them sufficient means to guarantee creation of an effective system, the principal their security must be cooperative in nature.
    [Show full text]