DOCSLIB.ORG

Cooperative European Defence System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cooperative European Defence System Food for thought 02-2019 Possibilities and Challenges to the Creation of a Cooperative European Defence System AN EXPERTISE FORUM CONTRIBUTING TO EUROPEAN CONTRIBUTING TO FORUM AN EXPERTISE SINCE 1953 ARMIES INTEROPERABILITY European Army Interoperability Center This paper was drawn up by M. Francesco Pettinari, European Defence Researcher, under the supervision and guidance of the Head of the Permanent Secretariat. This Food for Thought paper is a document that gives an initial reflection on the theme. The content is not reflecting the positions of the member states, but consists of elements that can initiate and feed the discussions and analyses in the domain of the theme. It was drafted by the Permanent Secretariat of Finabel. INTRODUCTION The European security environment has been sented by an approach to military cooperation subject to a large amount of changes within among countries which has the potential to the last two decades. For this reason, the crea- be a ‘game changer’ for the future of Europe- tion of a structured European defence system an defence. NATO launched this initiative in has become a primary necessity for Europe- 2014: The Framework Nations’ Concept. an states. Being involved in a highly volatile security environment and facing a myriad of This paper aims to give an overview of the economic, political, and practical problems, current status of the cooperative system for European countries started to understand guaranteeing European security and defence, that the only way to form a structure that addressing the essential requirements for the could give them sufficient means to guarantee creation of an effective system, the principal their security must be cooperative in nature. obstacles to its creation, and the main features of what is considered to be one of the most These countries have begun to organise them- successful examples of military cooperation, selves within clusters that are intended to em- launched up to date. This paper is divided power them by providing enough resources to into four chapters. ensure efficient deterrence and defence capa- bilities and, therefore, to guarantee their secu- The first chapter addresses the new require- rity in broader terms. Despite the existence of ments for the European defence system. well-structured international institutions such It presents the three most urgent issues un- as the European Union and the North Atlan- dermining European stability, and the new tic Treaty Organization (NATO) that play a requirements this entails. The last part of this leading role on the European stage, nations so chapter lists the three most essential elements far seem to be reluctant to gather together and for the future of European defence, and out- to cooperate within these large institutions, lines the effect of the new threats faced by Eu- preferring to maintain a leading role in the rope today. European defence integration process. In the second chapter, the focus moves on to However, both the European Union and the role of the European Union and NATO in NATO can play essential roles in guiding organising and assisting the European defence and supporting this process, and have already integration process. This chapter addresses the launched many initiatives aiming to do so. main obstacles to an integration deeply guid- The most crucial of these initiatives is repre- ed by one – or both – these institutions, and Possibilities and Challenges to the Creation of a Cooperative European Defence System 2 gives a description of the most probable way of Russian assertiveness crushed these dreams in which a structured and cooperative system and brought European governments back to for European defence will be created. The reality. What appeared to become more and second chapter evaluates the current existing more clear to Europeans was that hard power initiatives established by both the European – a concept which had remained out of the Union and NATO. European public security debate for a long time – can no longer be underestimated, and The third chapter is devoted to presenting the in fact, will be needed to some degree. Framework Nations’ Concept. This section describes the main aims and features of this This assumption does not aim to undermine initiative, illustrating the status of the already the efforts that European countries – especial- existing initiatives created. The last paragraph ly under the guidance of the European Union of the third chapter presents and comments (EU) – made in critical areas such as the Bal- on the reasons that make the Framework Na- kans or the Horn of Africa where the situation tions’ Concept the most successful attempt could have been much worse had Europeans so far to create an efficient European defence not intervened. In fact, the “soft military system. The fourth and fifth chapter of this power” used by European states to carry out paper contain the conclusion and some rec- limited stabilisation missions has proven to be ommendations deriving from the analysis en- effective. However, it is now clear that the EU closed in the previous sections. is seeking to achieve higher strategic autono- my, and greater capabilities to be able to act within and beyond its borders, as stated in the THE NEW REQUIREMENTS European Union Global Strategy released in FOR EUROPEAN SECURITY June 20161, and that this attempt will involve AND DEFENCE even non-EU members. Another aspect of the utmost relevance is rep- After having experienced two decades of rela- resented by the fact that the current political tive calm, in which European States’ security and economic environment has made it nec- did not seem to be threatened by external ac- essary to create new strategic, and operational tors or transnational phenomena, the last ten thinking to ensure the required capabilities in years brought on the re-emergence of Europe- order to guarantee European security. The es- an Security and Defence. It has now become tablishment of this new way of thinking was a forefront topic in the agenda of national – and still is – profoundly influenced by many governments and International Organisations. issues, most notably by the divergences in Indeed, if the end of the Cold War gave Euro- threats perceived by states, as well as the con- peans the illusion that they could decrease the tinuous cut-off of military expenditure that attention placed on their defence and security affected Europe since the fall of the Berlin systems, the emergence of transnational ter- Wall, and the United States’ request for fairer rorism, the instability of the European South- burden sharing in providing funds for Euro- ern border and the consequent mass migration pean defence within NATO. While the U.S. flows, as well as – more recently – the revival has placed increased emphasis on European 1 European Commission, “A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy”, Brussels, June 2016. Possibilities and Challenges to the Creation of a Cooperative European Defence System 3 states developing an independent – or at least new transnational terrorism. Due to the un- partially autonomous – defence system, di- predictable and non-territorial nature of this verging priorities and decreased budgets made phenomenon, it is difficult to create military it clear that the old ways in which nations operations and capabilities to combat against used to increase their security are no longer it. Many countries have created special units suitable options. In this evolving scenario, the and/or tasked already existing ones to prevent need for specialisation2, cooperation, and in- and challenge terrorist groups, but this did not teroperability among national Armed Forces considerably augment their military capabili- (AFs) is now in the spotlight. ties in this field. However, the countries that suffered the most from numerous terrorist attacks – namely the United Kingdom (UK) The New Security Environment: and France – have had to reduce the number Different Threats of military personnel and means that could and Countries’ Priorities have been devoted to other actions or tasks, including the ones that historically represent- ed the core capabilities of these states’ armed Nowadays, European countries are facing a forces (AFs). In particular, these two coun- much more unpredictable and volatile secu- tries have always preferred “interventionist rity environment. The stability of Europe as capabilities, rapidly deployable, supported by a whole is potentially affected by a vast va- their own strategic reconnaissance assets and riety of factors. All these factors are not per- capable of delivering heavy firepower”3, and ceived in the same way by different countries. these qualities continue to strongly character- Countries will always be primarily interested ise both the Forces Armées Françaises and Her in facing the threats they consider to be more Majesty’s Armed Forces. immediate. Threat perception of a country is well entrenched in its geographical position, A second factor that potentially undermines history, and geopolitical interests. Moreover, European stability is the migration flows and thanks to increasing relevance of the new the migration routes that cross Europe. Land- means that guarantee an easier and broader based routes can be somewhat easily regulated, participation in the socio-political life of a or at least patrolled through the employment country, even the internal public opinion has of border police or – as already done in some gained an essential role in shaping national European countries – with national AFs tak- defence policies. In the next part, I will dis- ing on a complementary role. The sea-based cuss the three crucial elements that jeopardize routes are much more controversial, and it European stability, creating different reactions can be quite difficult to regulate them. For among states can be identified. example, the geographical position, together with an increase in debate and awareness of The first element behind the unstable nature public opinion, forced Italy to be more and of the European security environment is the more concerned about its border security.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EN Council Conclusions on EU Relations with EFTA Countries
    COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION EN Council conclusions on EU relations with EFTA countries 3060th GENERAL AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 14 December 2010 The Council adopted the following conclusions: "1. The Council has assessed the development of relations between the EU and the four Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) since the adoption of its last conclusions on the subject in December 2008. Generally, EU relations with the EFTA countries, which were already considered to be very good and close in 2008, have further intensified in the past two years (details on developments are set out below in country- specific paragraphs). The Council is looking forward to continue the positive relationship with the EFTA countries and to deepen it in the future. It will reassess the state of relations between the EU and the EFTA countries in two years. 2. The Council appreciates the financial contributions of the EFTA countries to the economic and social cohesion in the European Economic Area (EEA). Norway, Liechtenstein and Iceland (the "EEA EFTA States") recently committed themselves to a substantial increase of their continued contributions. The EU is looking forward to a constructive dialogue with Switzerland on the review of the current mechanism, expiring in June 2012. The Council hopes that a mutually acceptable solution will be found with the aim of reducing economic and social disparities in the EU. 3. Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway are integrated in the internal market through the EEA Agreement of 1994. This Agreement functions properly so long as all Contracting Parties incorporate the full body of the relevant EU acquis relating to the internal market into their national law.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Defence: the White Book Implementation Process
    STUDY Requested by the SEDE Subcommittee EU Defence: The White Book implementation process Policy Department for External Relations Directorate General for External Policies of the Union PE 603.871 - December 2018 EN DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY EU Defence: The White Book implementation process ABSTRACT The question of a defence White Book at European level has been under discussion for some time. Many voices, particularly in the European Parliament, are pushing for such an initiative, while others consider that it is not only unnecessary, but could even dangerously divide Europeans. Concretely, the question cannot be tackled separately from that of defence planning and processes which underpin the development of military capabilities, as White Books are often the starting point for these. Within the European Union, however, there is not just one, but three types defence planning: the national planning of each of the Member States; planning within the framework of NATO (the NATO Defence Planning Process) and, finally, the European Union’s planning, which has developed in stages since the Helsinki summit of 1999 and comprises many elements. Its best-known component - but by no means not the only one - is the capability development plan established by the European Defence Agency. How do all these different planning systems coexist? What are their strengths and weaknesses? Answering these preliminary questions is essential in mapping the path to a White Book. This is what this study sets out to do. EP/EXPO/B/SEDE/FWC/2013-08/Lot6/23 EN December 2018 - PE 603.871 © European Union, 2018 Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies This document was requested by the European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Security and Defence (SEDE) on 7 July 2018 Manuscript was completed on 12 December 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Preisträgerinnen | Preisträger 2014 Preisträgerinnen Und Preisträger Des 12
    Preisträgerinnen | Preisträger 2014 Preisträgerinnen und Preisträger des 12. Kunstwettbewerbs der Bundeswehr 2014 Seit 1997 wird der Kunstwettbewerb der Bundeswehr vom Streitkräfteamt ausgeschrieben. Organisiert wird der Wettbewerb im Wechsel von der Evangelischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Soldatenbetreuung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland e.V. (EAS) und der Katholischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Soldatenbetreuung e.V. (KAS). Schirmherrschaft Amtschef Streitkräfteamt Veranstalter Streitkräfteamt (SKA), Dezernat Betreuung und Fürsorge Pascalstraße 10s 53125 Bonn E-Mail: [email protected] Organisation des 12. Kunstwettbewerbs der Bundeswehr 2014 Katholische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Soldatenbetreuung e.V. Justus-von-Liebig-Str. 31 53121 Bonn Telefon: 0228 98862-0 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.kas-soldatenbetreuung.de Organisation des 13. Kunstwettbewerbs der Bundeswehr 2016 Evangelische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Soldatenbetreuung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland e.V. Auguststraße 80 10117 Berlin Telefon: 030 28395-310 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.eas-berlin.de Projektleitung PrueferPR, Hildesheim E-Mail: [email protected] Webseite www.kunstbw.de – Die EAS / KAS Plattform für Kunst und Kultur in der Bundeswehr © November 2014, Katholische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Soldatenbetreuung e.V., Bonn Alle Rechte vorbehalten Gestaltung | Satz PrueferPR, Hildesheim Titelbild | Plakat Artvertisement, Reiferscheid Fotografie der Werke Streitkräfteamt, Bonn Grußworte Generalmajor Werner Weisenburger, Amtschef Streitkräfteamt Marcus Grübel
    [Show full text]
  • Nato and Eu: Towards a Constructive Relationship?
    between the two organisations on the ground. The question that has to be asked, therefore, is if it is really the case that the establishment of a constructive relationship between NATO and the COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY EU is in effect being held hostage to the long-standing disagreements about Cyprus. NATO and EU: Two planets in the same city Towards a Constructive Relationship? Trine Flockhart Senior Researcher, DIIS The relationship between NATO and the EU has never been a close one as the two organisa- tions have historically tended to focus on different agendas and different policy areas, roughly divided between a focus on economic and development issues and a focus on military and security issues. However, after a rather unconstructive and competitive relationship during most of the 1990s, the first decade of the 21st century has witnessed convergence between the two organisations. Through the successful establishment of the European Security and he security challenges of the 21st century are likely to be both multifaceted, highly complex Defence Policy (ESDP) in 1999, the EU has taken on a much greater role as a security actor, and of an increasingly interdependent and global nature. The international community whereas NATO’s experience in the Balkans and Afghanistan has clearly revealed that military T is therefore faced with problems that cannot easily fit into traditional boxes and which solutions alone cannot bring peace and prosperity to post-conflict societies. require a so-called comprehensive approach, with emphasis on cooperation between different international actors and between different agencies across the traditional divides that separate Convergence between the two organisations in policy areas has been accompanied by geo- civilian and military approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Forces As an Element of National Power, and Compulsory Military Service
    Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Volume: 3 – Issue: 4 – October - 2013 Armed Forces as an Element of National Power, and Compulsory Military Service Suat Begeç, Turkey Abstract Whether military service should be done as a national duty or left to the professionals has been discussed for a long time both in Turkey and across the world. In order to answer this question and make relevant suggestions, this paper begins with the recruitment system in the Turkish Armed Forces during the history. Subsequently, armed forces of neighbor countries, their communication strategies and of those politically linked with Turkey as well as the world armies carrying weight for the scope of this study are all analyzed. Thirdly, current military service and its flawed aspects are explained. Finally come suggestions on how the military service should be. Keywords: Armed forces, compulsory military service, national army, recruitment © Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 179 Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Volume: 3 – Issue: 4 – October - 2013 Introduction Neither numbers nor technology wins in a war… The winner is always the heart. There is no might that can stand against a unit banded together. Soldiers believe that if they lose their life in a war, they will die a martyr and be worthy of heaven; and that if they survive they will be a veteran and leave unforgettable memories to his children. This belief renders them fearless. This bestows on their commanders a power that few leaders have. Power is the ability to influence people and events. Power is the ability that leaders and managers gain and enjoy through their personalities, activities and situations within the organizational structure [Newstrom & Davis, 2002:272].
    [Show full text]
  • EURODRONES Inc
    EURODRONES Inc. A report by Ben Hayes, Chris Jones & Eric Töpfer PUBLICATION INFO Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the input of Mathias Monroy, Stefanie Sifft, Mathias Vermeulen and Wim Zwijnenburg for their suggestions regarding aspects of the report. Copyright and publication details This report is published by the Transnational Institute and Statewatch under ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as pri- vate individuals/”fair dealing” is allowed. Usage by those working for organisations is allowed provided the organi- sation holds an appropriate licence from the relevant repro- graphic rights organisation (eg. Copyright Licensing Agen- cy in the UK), with such usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law. Authors Ben Hayes, Chris Jones & Eric Toepfer Design Hans Roor at Jubels, Amsterdam Contact Transnational Institute (TNI) PO Box 14656, 1001 LD, Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: +31-20-6626608 Email: [email protected] www.tni.org Statewatch PO Box 1516, London, N16 0EW England Tel: +44-207 697 4202 Email: [email protected] www.statewatch.org Amsterdam, February 2014 EURODRONES Inc. A report by Ben Hayes, Chris Jones & Eric Töpfer EURODRONES Inc. Contents 1. Introduction 7 2. Drones and the European Union: a lobbyist’s paradise 10 2.1. Summary 10 2.2. Reaching for the stars 11 2.3. The road to drone-ware 12 2.4. Establishing a favourable regulatory environment 14 2.5. Towards an EU drone policy 18 2.6. Going global: EU + USA = ICAO drone standards? 21 2.7. “Drone-washing”: the battle for hearts and minds 23 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Sovereign Cooperation (PESCO) to Underpin the EU Global Strategy Jo Coelmont
    No. 80 December 2016 Permanent Sovereign COoperation (PESCO) to Underpin the EU Global Strategy Jo Coelmont The EU now has a full-fledged Global in point. Clearly Member States are not averse Strategy for Foreign and Security Policy – to the principle of PESCO as such nor to the and defence. Just in time. The EUGS permanent mutual commitment that it entails. includes a clear political level of ambition Then why are they reluctant to launch PESCO as well as a call to define the in the EU framework? corresponding military level of ambition and the required capabilities. The list of SOVEREIGNTY? strategic military shortfalls, first identified The answer is simple: PESCO‟s historic in 2000 at the start of the then European baggage. PESCO cannot be dissociated from Security and Defence Policy, will obviously how its initiators envisaged it during the grow still longer. For new tasks have to be European Convention back in 2003. At that integrated, while in the last fifteen years, in time the aim was not for PESCO to be as spite of all the good intentions about inclusive as possible, but rather to assemble “pooling and sharing”, not a single the happy few: “Those Member States whose existing strategic shortfall has been solved. military capabilities fulfil higher criteria and Because a shortfall cannot be pooled – one which have made more binding commitments can only share one’s frustration at that. No to one another in this area with a view to the wonder therefore that Permanent most demanding missions”, who would agree Structured Cooperation (PESCO) is once on “objectives concerning the level of again on the agenda as a potential game investment expenditure on defence changer.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Studies for Officers
    University VIENNA and National Defense Academy VIENNA Academic Studies for Officers A Central European Perspective (Presentations of the First International Conference in Vienna, 15 – 19 March 1999) Published by Brigadier-General Gernot ALBRECHT Vienna, April 2001 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS WOLFGANG GREISENEGGER..................................................3 Welcome Address......................................................................................3 ERNEST KÖNIG..........................................................................5 Welcome Address......................................................................................5 GERNOT ALBRECHT .................................................................9 Opening Statement....................................................................................9 ARMIN A. STEINKAMM ............................................................10 The Bundeswehr University [UDBW]..................................................10 JÖRG E. P. KELLER.................................................................17 Academic Officer Training within and for the Armed Forces – a German Perspective ....................................................................................................................17 BEAT A. KÄCH .........................................................................32 The Swiss Military College ....................................................................32 ALTERO FASANO.....................................................................43
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Commander EUTM Mali Brigadegeneral Franz Pfrengle Englx
    Mission Commander EUTM Mali Brigadier General Franz Xaver Pfrengle Graduate Engineer born at 3. Dezember 1956 in Furtwangen/Black Forest married, three children Joined the Bundeswehr (German Armed Forces); Engineer Officer Training, 1975 Munich Pursued studies in mechanical engineering at the Bundeswehr University 1976 - 1981 Hamburg; Completed his officer training in Hanover and Munich 1981 - 1983 Platoon Commander, Heavy Engineer Battalion 220, Munich 1983 - 1985 Platoon Commander and Chief Instructor, Engineer School, Munich 1985 - 1988 Company Commander, Engineer Pipeline Battalion 800, Wuppertal German General Staff Officers’ Training, 1988 - 1990 Bundeswehr Command and Staff College (FüAkBw), Hamburg French General Staff Officers’ Training, Ecole supérieure de guerre (French 1990 - 1992 War College) and Cours supérieur interarmées (Joint Service Advanced Course), Paris G2, 12th Armoured Division, Veitshöchheim (during this period: 1992 - 1993 participation in the UNOSOM mission in Somalia) 1993 - 1996 Section Chief G3 Ops, HQ EUROCORPS, Strasbourg Battalion Commander, Heavy Engineer Battalion 12, Volkach (during this 1996 - 1998 period: PfP exercise MATI in Albania) Assistant Branch Chief ‘‘Military Policy and Bilateral Relations’’ (Fü S III 1), 1998 - 2000 Federal Ministry of Defence, Bonn/Berlin 2000 - 2002 Course Director, Army General Staff Course (FüAkBw), Hamburg Assistant Director (Europe, ESDP, Africa), Policy Planning and Advisory Staff 2002 -2004 to the German Minister of Defence, Berlin Studies at the Centre des hautes
    [Show full text]
  • Commander's Guide to German Society, Customs, and Protocol
    Headquarters Army in Europe United States Army, Europe, and Seventh Army Pamphlet 360-6* United States Army Installation Management Agency Europe Region Office Heidelberg, Germany 20 September 2005 Public Affairs Commanders Guide to German Society, Customs, and Protocol *This pamphlet supersedes USAREUR Pamphlet 360-6, 8 March 2000. For the CG, USAREUR/7A: E. PEARSON Colonel, GS Deputy Chief of Staff Official: GARY C. MILLER Regional Chief Information Officer - Europe Summary. This pamphlet should be used as a guide for commanders new to Germany. It provides basic information concerning German society and customs. Applicability. This pamphlet applies primarily to commanders serving their first tour in Germany. It also applies to public affairs officers and protocol officers. Forms. AE and higher-level forms are available through the Army in Europe Publishing System (AEPUBS). Records Management. Records created as a result of processes prescribed by this publication must be identified, maintained, and disposed of according to AR 25-400-2. Record titles and descriptions are available on the Army Records Information Management System website at https://www.arims.army.mil. Suggested Improvements. The proponent of this pamphlet is the Office of the Chief, Public Affairs, HQ USAREUR/7A (AEAPA-CI, DSN 370-6447). Users may suggest improvements to this pamphlet by sending DA Form 2028 to the Office of the Chief, Public Affairs, HQ USAREUR/7A (AEAPA-CI), Unit 29351, APO AE 09014-9351. Distribution. B (AEPUBS) (Germany only). 1 AE Pam 360-6 ● 20 Sep 05 CONTENTS Section I INTRODUCTION 1. Purpose 2. References 3. Explanation of Abbreviations 4. General Section II GETTING STARTED 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Trine Bramsen Minister of Defence 24 September 2020 Via E
    Trine Bramsen Minister of Defence 24 September 2020 Via e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Dear Minister, Thank you for your letter dated 12 May 2020. I am writing on behalf of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) Foundation and our US affiliate, which has more than 6.5 million members and supporters worldwide. We appreciate that the Danish armed forces have reduced their use of animals for live tissue training (LTT) from 110 animals in 2016 – as reported by the Danish Defence Command on 3 July 2020 pursuant to a citizen's request – to only nine animals in 2020. Considering how few animals have been used for LTT this year and given that a ratio of two to six students per animal (as stated in the new five-year "Militær traumatologi" LTT permit1) amounts to only 18 to 54 personnel undergoing the training this year, there is no significant investment in – or compelling justification for – using animals in LTT. Based on the information presented in this letter, we urge you to immediately suspend all use of animals for LTT while the Danish Armed Forces Medical Command conducts a comprehensive new evaluation of available non-animal trauma training methods to achieve full compliance with Directive 2010/63/EU and, in light of this evaluation, provide a definitive timeline for fully ending the Danish armed forces' use of animals for LTT. Danish Defence Command Does Not Have a List of LTT Simulation Models It Has Reviewed The aforementioned citizen's request asked for the following information: "[a] list of non-animal models that have been reviewed by the Danish Ministry of Defence for live tissue training (otherwise known as LTT or trauma training), with dates indicating when these reviews were conducted, and reasons why these non-animal models were rejected as full replacements to the use of animals for this training".2 1Animal Experiments Inspectorate, Ministry of Environment and Food.
    [Show full text]
  • Death of an Institution: the End for Western European Union, a Future
    DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? EGMONT PAPER 46 DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? ALYSON JK BAILES AND GRAHAM MESSERVY-WHITING May 2011 The Egmont Papers are published by Academia Press for Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations. Founded in 1947 by eminent Belgian political leaders, Egmont is an independent think-tank based in Brussels. Its interdisciplinary research is conducted in a spirit of total academic freedom. A platform of quality information, a forum for debate and analysis, a melting pot of ideas in the field of international politics, Egmont’s ambition – through its publications, seminars and recommendations – is to make a useful contribution to the decision- making process. *** President: Viscount Etienne DAVIGNON Director-General: Marc TRENTESEAU Series Editor: Prof. Dr. Sven BISCOP *** Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations Address Naamsestraat / Rue de Namur 69, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone 00-32-(0)2.223.41.14 Fax 00-32-(0)2.223.41.16 E-mail [email protected] Website: www.egmontinstitute.be © Academia Press Eekhout 2 9000 Gent Tel. 09/233 80 88 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.academiapress.be J. Story-Scientia NV Wetenschappelijke Boekhandel Sint-Kwintensberg 87 B-9000 Gent Tel. 09/225 57 57 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.story.be All authors write in a personal capacity. Lay-out: proxess.be ISBN 978 90 382 1785 7 D/2011/4804/136 U 1612 NUR1 754 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]