4 Down Stream Processing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dewatering of a Biological Industrial Sludge by Electrokinetics-Assisted Filter Press
G Model SEPPUR-10125; No. of Pages 6 ARTICLE IN PRESS Separation and Purification Technology xxx (2011) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Separation and Purification Technology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/seppur Dewatering of a biological industrial sludge by electrokinetics-assisted filter press Gordon C.C. Yang ∗, Min-Cong Chen, Chun-Fu Yeh Institute of Environmental Engineering & Center for Emerging Contaminants Research, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan article info abstract Keywords: The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of biological industrial sludge dewatering Filter press by a pilot-scale filter press assisted by electrokinetics (EK). In all experiments the following conditions Biological industrial sludge were kept constant: (1) dry solids content in the sludge feed: 5.0 wt%; and (2) constant electric-current Dewatering mode. Application of 1 A and 4 A of electric current for 45 min for dewatering was capable of yielding Electrokinetics sludge filter cakes with moisture contents of 65.0% and 53.2%, respectively. However, the former would Electroosmotic permeability provide a better compromise between the residual moisture content and the electricity cost. This practice has been shown to be cost-effective. The reduction of sludge moisture content might be ascribed to the mechanisms of mechanical pressure, electroosmosis, and ohmic heating in said dewatering system. The estimated electroosmotic permeability was found to be comparable to that of reported by other researchers. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction developed. It is well known that the flow of water induced by an electrical potential difference is not limited by pore size. -
The Recovery and Purification of Fermentation Products the Choice of Recovery Process Is Based on the Following Criteria
The Recovery and Purification of Fermentation Products The choice of recovery process is based on the following criteria: Product intracellular or extracellular Concentration of the product in the fermentation broth. Physical and chemical properties of the desired product Intended use of the product. Minimal acceptable standard of purity. Magnitude of bio-hazard of the product or broth. Impurities in the fermenter broth. Market price for the product. How to reduce purification cost Selection of a micro-organism which does not produce pigments or undesirable metatlolites Modification of the fermentation to reduce the production of metabolites Precise timing of harvesting pH control after harvesting Temperature treatment after harvesting Addition of flocculating agents Use of enzymes to attack cell walls The recovery and purification of many compounds may be achieved by a number of alternative routes. The decision to follow a particular route involves comparing the following factors to determine the most appropriate under a given set of circumstances: Capital and Processing costs Throughput requirements Yield potential and Product quality Technical expertise available Conformance to regulatory requirements Waste treatment needs Continuous or batch processing Automation Personnel health and safety REMOVAL OF MICROBIAL CELLS AND OTHER SOLID MATTER Use of electrophoresis and dielectrophoresis to exploit the charged properties of microbial cells, ultrasonic treatment to improve flocculation characteristics and magnetic separations. FOAM SEPARATION Foam separation depends on using methods which exploit differences in surface activity of materials. The material may be whole cells or molecules such as a protein or colloidal, and is selectively adsorbed or attached to the surface of gas bubbles rising through a liquid, to be concentrated or separated and finally removed by skimming. -
Separation Expertise for Your Success in the Iron Ore Industry
SEPARATION EXPERTISE FOR YOUR SUCCESS IN THE IRON ORE INDUSTRY ASK YOUR SEPARATION SPECIALIST YOUR IDEAS YOUR NEEDS YOUR BUSINESS YOUR SEPARATION SPECIALIST 2 How can we make your iron ore production more profitable? How will your business continue to grow despite changing iron ore prices? What equipment will give you reliable performance with minimal residual moisture? What will it take to boost capacity at the lowest possible cost? A SOLUTION TO IMPROVE EVERY PROCESS YOUR SEPARATION SPECIALIST Having served large producers like Jindal along with For all customers, it’s just a matter of reducing investment smaller operators such as CML Metals and Stoilensky and operating costs for high-throughput applications. GOK, we know the complex challenges you face. Other times, the aim is to reduce wastewater from tailings From difficult ore bodies to boosting availability, each treatment in remote deserts. Whatever the situation, solution demands a unique level of expertise. the core challenge is to find the most efficient, reliable solution for your separation needs. YOUR PARTNER IN INNOVATION To many customers, we’re known as the partner of choice for high-capacity concentrate dewatering with the lowest operating costs. In one case, this meant PRODUCTS increasing throughput to more than 500 t/h per machine, with half the total footprint of traditional solutions. In a different brownfield project, the result was the world’s largest hyperbaric disc filter in iron ore production, with a KNOWLEDGE guaranteed residual moisture content of 7% requested at high throughput and clear filtrate. RESOURCES YOU CAN COUNT ON Whether it’s thickening or filtration, concentrate or tailings, the list of success stories goes on and on. -
Liquid / Solids Separation in Wastewater Treatment & Biosolids Dewatering
LIQUID / SOLIDS SEPARATION IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT & BIOSOLIDS DEWATERING Chemical Products Lab Testing Plant Trials LIQUID / SOLIDS SEPARATION APPLICATIONS Influent Water Clarification Process Water Recycling Primary Wastewater Clarification Secondary Clarification Sludge Thickening Sludge Dewatering LIQUID / SOLIDS SEPARATION UNIT OPERATIONS Clarifiers (Many Types) WATER Filters (Many Types) OR WASTE Dissolved Air Flotation Units WATER Induced Air/Gas Flotation Units Belt Presses Centrifuges SLUDGE Screw Presses DEWATERING Plate and Frame Presses Vacuum Filters (Rotary & Horizontal) LIQUID / SOLIDS SEPARATION PRODUCT TYPES Coagulants (+) Low Mol Wt Organic Inorganic Blended Flocculants (+ , ---, 0 ) High Mol Wt Dry Emulsion Solution OilOil----FreeFree Flocculants COAGULANTS AND FLOCCULANTS Act on Insoluble Particles in Water Oils, Grease, Blood, Insoluble Organics, Clay, Silicates, Metal Oxides/Hydroxides Dirt, Dust, Rust & Metal Filings Can Act on Charged Organic Compounds Anionic Surfactants, Soaps & Dispersants Do Not Act on Most Dissolved Solids Salts, Acids, Nonionic Surfactants, Ammonia or Soluble Organic Compounds such as Sugar, Alcohols, etc. SUSPENSION CHEMISTRY THE KEY TO EFFECTIVE LIQUID / SOLIDS SEPARATION SUSPENDED SOLIDS VARIABLES Surface Charge MOST Charge Density Particle Size IMPORTANCE Composition Particle Density Particle Shape LEAST MICROSCOPIC FORCES ELECTROSTATIC BROWNIAN VAN DER WAALS GRAVITY Colloidal Particle in Water +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ Almost all Particles +++ -
A Review of the Rotary Pressure Filter for the Filtration of a Liquefied Gas Slurry
A REVIEW OF THE ROTARY PRESSURE FILTER FOR THE FILTRATION OF A LIQUEFIED GAS SLURRY Barry A. Perlmutter BHS-Filtration Inc. Barry A. Perlmutter is President and Managing Director of BHS-Filtration Inc., a subsidiary of BHS-Sonthofen GmbH. Barry has over 30 years of technical and marketing experience in the field of solid-liquid separation, filtration, centrifugation and drying. He has published and lectured worldwide and has been responsible for introducing and creating growth for many European companies into the marketplace. He has a BS in Chemistry from Albany State, NY, MS from the School of Engineering at Washington University, St. Louis and an MBA from the University of Illinois. ABSTRACT In the manufacturing of this specialty chemical, the pilot plant examined the process to determine the most effective method for filtration to develop a production process. A study was undertaken, by plant engineering and development, to examine the use of a rotary pressure filter to develop the overall process operations for product quality and production rates. This paper reviews the basics of two alternatives: rotary pressure filter and pressurized drum filters. The technologies are reviewed for the filtration of a liquefied gas slurry. The article continues with the discussion of the process testing in the laboratory and in the field to evaluate the Rotary Pressure Filter. The lab testing used a BHS pressurized pocket leaf filter with 20 cm 2 of filter area while the fieldwork was conducted on a Rotary Pressure Filter with a filter area of 0.18 m 2. The paper discusses test procedures, data collection, filter media selection and other process parameters. -
1 Downstream Processing of Biotechnology Products
1 1 Downstream Processing of Biotechnology Products 1.1 Introduction Biological products are important for many applications including biotransforma- tions, diagnostics, research and development, and in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetics industries. For certain applications, biological products can be used as crude extracts with little or no purifi cation. However, biopharmaceuticals typi- cally require exceptional purity, making downstream processing a critical compo- nent of the overall process. From the regulatory viewpoint, the production process itself defi nes the biopharmaceutical product rendering proper defi nition of effec- tive and effi cient downstream processing steps crucial early in process develop- ment. Currently, proteins are the most important biopharmaceuticals. The history of their development as industrial products goes back more than half a century. Blood plasma fractionation was the fi rst full - scale biopharmaceutical industry with a current annual production in the 100 - ton scale [1, 2] . Precipitation with organic solvents has been and continues to be the principal purifi cation tool in plasma fractionation, although, recently, chromatographic separation processes have also been integrated into this industry. Anti - venom antibodies and other anti - toxins extracted from animal sources are additional examples of early biopharmaceuti- cals, also purifi ed by a combination of precipitation, fi ltration and chromatogra- phy. In contrast, current biopharmaceuticals are almost exclusively produced by recombinant DNA technology. Chromatography and membrane fi ltration serve as the main tools for purifi cation for these products. Figure 1.1 shows the 2006 market share of various biopharmaceuticals. Approxi- mately one - third are antibodies or antibody fragments [3] , nearly 20% are erythro- poietins, and 14% are insulins. -
Municipal Sludge Dewatering Using a Belt Filter Press by Daniel D. Reitz
MuniCipal Sludge Dewatering Using a Belt Filter Press by Daniel D. Reitz Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science m Environmental Engineering APPROVED: D~;i_ T. No~ak, Chairman Dr. William R. Knocke Dr. Clifford W. Rand~Jf August 3, 1988 Blacksburg, Virginia Municipal Sludge Dewatering Using a Belt Filter Press by Daniel D. Reitz Dr. John T. Novak, Chairman Environmental Engineering (ABSTRACT) Experiments were performed on alum, anaerobically digested and aerobically digested sludges to determine the optimum polymer conditioning for a belt filter press The op- timum polymer dosages for all three zones of a belt filter press were compared with each other to determine the best overall conditioning. The requirements of all three zones of a belt filter press were the same. However, the gravity rate of drainage seems to under predict the dosages for optimum belt filter press performance. In addition the total mixing energy, G (the shear) and t (the mixing time), that represents the laboratory belt filter press was found to be approximately 45,000. Using a mixing energy input of 45,000 and a standard Buchner funnel apparatus the correct polymer dose for the belt filter press can be predicted. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank Dr. John Novak for all his help not only in the pursuit of this thesis, but for his support in attending graduate school. I would also like to thank Dr. Clifford Randall who helped secure funding for my graduate education. -
UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Effect of Electrostatic Interactions on Performance of Electrically Conductive Ultrafiltration Membranes for Protein Fractionation Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/79q015j9 Author Yeung, Raymond Kai-yen Publication Date 2017 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Effect of Electrostatic Interactions on Performance of Electrically Conductive Ultrafiltration Membranes for Protein Fractionation A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Bioengineering by Raymond Kai-yen Yeung September 2017 Thesis Committee: Dr. Victor G. J. Rodgers, Chairperson Dr. David Jassby Dr. Boris Hyle Park Copyright by Raymond Kai-yen Yeung 2017 The Thesis of Raymond Kai-yen Yeung is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My sincerest gratitude goes to my advisor, Dr. Victor G. J. Rodgers, whose instruction and guidance have facilitated my development as a researcher and scholar. His advice, knowledge of the research area, and commitment to his students have been crucial in fostering my growth and challenging me to reach new heights. I deeply value the research opportunity and am grateful for his continuous support. I would like to thank the members of my thesis committee, Dr. David Jassby and Dr. Hyle Park, for their support and advice they have provided in my research and graduate studies. I would also like to thank Xiaobo (Ben) Zhu for patiently assisting me in the laboratory, Dr. Alexander Dudchenko for providing valuable feedback in our discussions, and Dr. -
Aqueous Two-Phase System (ATPS): an Overview and Advances in Its
Iqbal et al. Biological Procedures Online (2016) 18:18 DOI 10.1186/s12575-016-0048-8 REVIEW Open Access Aqueous two-phase system (ATPS): an overview and advances in its applications Mujahid Iqbal1, Yanfei Tao1*, Shuyu Xie1, Yufei Zhu1, Dongmei Chen1, Xu Wang1, Lingli Huang1, Dapeng Peng1, Adeel Sattar1, Muhammad Abu Bakr Shabbir2, Hafiz Iftikhar Hussain2, Saeed Ahmed2 and Zonghui Yuan1,2* Abstract Aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) is a liquid-liquid fractionation technique and has gained an interest because of great potential for the extraction, separation, purification and enrichment of proteins, membranes, viruses, enzymes, nucleic acids and other biomolecules both in industry and academia. Although, the partition behavior involved in the method is complex and difficult to predict. Current research shows that it has also been successfully used in the detection of veterinary drug residues in food, separation of precious metals, sewage treatment and a variety of other purposes. The ATPS is able to give high recovery yield and is easily to scale up. It is also very economic and environment friendly method. The aim of this review is to overview the basics of ATPS, optimization and its applications. Keywords: Aqueous two-phase system (ATPS), Biomolecule separation, Solvent extraction, Veterinary drug residues History and background hydrophobic groups [5] Interested readers about In 1896, Martinus Willem Beijerinck accidently found aqueous two-phase affinity partitioning (ATPAP) are the ATPS while mixing an aqueous solution of starch referred to an excellent review by Ruiz-Ruiz et al. [6]. and gelatin. However, its real application was discovered Water as the main component of both phases in ATPS by Per-Åke Albertsson. -
What Can Cell Culture Flocculation Offer for Antibody Purification Processes
Editorial 2 Editorial What can cell culture flocculation offer for antibody purification processes “The eventual goal of the application of flocculation in monoclonal antibody processing is to develop a separation unit operation alternative to chromatography, with equivalent separation efficiency, Pharm. Bioprocess. high process capacity, good facility fit and sound process economics.” Keywords: antibody • flocculation • harvest • impurity removal • purification Recent advances in cell culture processes solid content with wide particle distribution Yun (Kenneth) Kang have significantly increased monoclonal anti- and a high percentage of small particles fur- Author for correspondence: body (mAb) titers to levels as high as 30 g/l. ther complicate the harvest unit operation, BioProcess Sciences, Eli Lilly Not unexpectedly, these improvements have requiring significantly higher depth filter & Company, 450 East 29th Street, New York, NY 10016, USA resulted in a new set of starting conditions surface area which may exceed the existing [email protected] for downstream processing, including: ele- filtration train capacity. Harvest operations vated cell density levels (up to 108 cells/ml), have become extremely challenging, if not Dale L Ludwig BioProcess Sciences, Eli Lilly increased solid content (packed cell volume, impossible because of these issues. & Company, 450 East 29th Street, up to 40%) and increased soluble impurity Flocculation has been widely used for New York, NY 10016, USA levels such as host cell proteins (HCP) and many years in the chemical and food indus- Paul Balderes high molecular weight species (HMW; up tries, as well as in wastewater treatment. In BioProcess Sciences, Eli Lilly to 40%) [1–4] . New advances in mAb down- recent years, flocculation-based pretreatment & Company, 450 East 29th Street, stream processing are critically needed, in of cell cultures to circumvent both harvest New York, NY 10016, USA order to meet the significant challenges posed and purification issues experienced in mAb by increased cell culture productivity. -
Colloid Polishing Filter Method - Filter Flow Technology, Inc
EPA/540/R-94/501 May 1995 Colloid Polishing Filter Method - Filter Flow Technology, Inc. Innovative Technology Evaluation Report RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268 @ Printed on Recycled Paper Notice The information in this document has been prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program under Contract No. 68-CO-0047. This document has been subjected to EPA’s peer and administrative reviews and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. ii Foreword The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program was authorized by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986. The program is administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development. The purpose of the SITE program is to accelerate the development and use of innovative cleanup technologies applicable to Superfund and other hazardous waste sites. This purpose is accomplished through technology demonstrations designed to provide performance and cost data on selected technologies. This project consisted of a demonstration conducted under the SITE program to evaluate the Colloid Polishing Filter Method technology developed by Filter Flow Technology, Inc.The technology demonstration was conducted at a U.S. Department of Energy site. This Innovative Technology Evaluation Report provides an interpretation of the data and discusses the potential applicability of the technology. A limited number of copies of this report will be available at no charge from EPA’s Center for Environmental Research Information, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268,513-569-7562..Requests should include the EPA document number found on the report’s cover. -
Downstream Processing
Chapter 11 Downstream Processing ©2016 Montgomery County Community College Objectives This chapter provides an overview of downstream processing. After completing this chapter, students will be able to: . Describe the general elements of the downstream purification process for a typical monoclonal antibody-based therapeutic, starting with the bioreactor harvest pool and finishing with pre-formulation, pure drug product. Explain the overall goals of the purification process from the standpoint of purity, yield, and efficiency as well as the general strategies employed to achieve these goals. Define the specific methods and in-process tools and materials used in typical steps of the downstream process and the purposes and physical/chemical mechanisms occurring at each step, including: – clarification of the bioreactor harvest by depth filtration and/or centrifugation – capture chromatography for product concentration and initial purification – ultrafiltration and diafiltration of the product at various stages in the downstream process – intermediate purification chromatography steps – final polishing chromatography steps . Describe general economic factors contributing to the cost of goods produced and common considerations/strategies for optimizing and improving those process economics. Classify specific departmental contributions to the ongoing operation and maintenance of the downstream unit operations within a facility. 424 Chapter 11 - Downstream Processing Terms Capture/recovery: the rapid separation of the product of interest from