<<

LIQUID / SOLIDS SEPARATION IN &

Chemical Products Lab Testing Plant Trials

LIQUID / SOLIDS SEPARATION APPLICATIONS

 Influent Water Clarification  Process Water Recycling  Primary Wastewater Clarification  Secondary Clarification  Thickening  Sludge Dewatering LIQUID / SOLIDS SEPARATION UNIT OPERATIONS

 (Many Types) WATER  Filters (Many Types) OR WASTE  Units WATER  Induced Air/Gas Flotation Units  Belt Presses  Centrifuges SLUDGE  Screw Presses DEWATERING  Plate and Frame Presses  Vacuum Filters (Rotary & Horizontal)

LIQUID / SOLIDS SEPARATION PRODUCT TYPES

 Coagulants (+) Low Mol Wt  Organic  Inorganic  Blended  Flocculants (+ , ---, 0 ) High Mol Wt  Dry  Emulsion  Solution  OilOil----FreeFree Flocculants COAGULANTS AND FLOCCULANTS

Act on Insoluble Particles in Water Oils, Grease, Blood, Insoluble Organics, Clay, Silicates, Metal Oxides/Hydroxides Dirt, Dust, Rust & Metal Filings

Can Act on Charged Organic Compounds Anionic Surfactants, Soaps & Dispersants

Do Not Act on Most Dissolved Solids Salts, Acids, Nonionic Surfactants, Ammonia or Soluble Organic Compounds such as Sugar, Alcohols, etc.

SUSPENSION CHEMISTRY

THE KEY TO EFFECTIVE LIQUID / SOLIDS SEPARATION SUSPENDED SOLIDS VARIABLES

 Surface Charge MOST  Charge Density  Particle Size IMPORTANCE  Composition  Particle Density

 Particle Shape LEAST

MICROSCOPIC FORCES

ELECTROSTATIC

BROWNIAN

VAN DER WAALS

GRAVITY Colloidal Particle in Water +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ Almost all Particles +++ +++ +++ +++ of Industrial Interest +++ Have a Negative +++ +++ Surface Charge. +++ +++ +++ +++ The Particle is +++ +++ +++ +++ Surrounded by an +++ +++ Equal Number of +++ +++ Positive Counterions. +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++

PARTICLES IN WATER REPEL EACH OTHER +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ + +++ +++ +++ +++ ++ +++ +++ +++ Colloidal Particle in Water +++ +++ +++ +++ RATIO +++ +++ +++ OF EXCESS +++ +++ +++ CATIONS +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ EQUAL +++ +++ NUMBER +++ +++ OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE +++ CHARGES +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ DISTANCE FROM PARTICLE

ADSORPTION OF CATIONIC POLYMER NEUTRALIZES CHARGES AND COLLAPSES FIELDS

Van der Waals Force of Attraction Now Stronger Than The Electrical Force of Repulsion NEUTRALIZED PARTICLES COAGULATE

2 STOKE’S LAW: ν = 2Gr (ρ − ρ οοο) / 9η

ν = SETTLING RATE G = GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT r = RADIUS OF PARTICLE ρρρ = DENSITY OF PARTICLE ρρρo = DENSITY OF LIQUID ηηη = VISCOSITY OF LIQUID

BIGGER SETTLES FASTER Effect of Decreasing Particle Size

MATERIAL DIAMETER SETTLING TIME (in mm) PER METER

Gravel 10 1 second Course sand 1 10 seconds Fine sand 0.1 2 minutes Silt 0.01 90 minutes Bacteria 0.001 1 week Colloidal particles 0.0001 2 years Colloidal particles 0.00001 20 years Colloidal particles 0.000001 200 years

EFFECT OF COAGULATION AND

MANY FEWER SMALL LARGE OPTIMUM MIXING FOR CLARIFICATION APPLICATIONS

COAGULANT FLOCCULANT NO MIXING EFFLUENT

STATIC MIXER LIQUID INFLUENT FAST SLOW SLUDGE

CHARGE BRIDGING SETTLING NEUTRALIZATION + OF FLOCS + FLOC INTER-PARTICLE GROWTH COLLISIONS

COAGULATION PROCESS

 Adsorption of Cationic Coagulant  Neutralizes Negative Surface Charges

 Reduces Electrical Barrier

 Allows Van der Waals Forces to Predominate  Interparticle Collisions

 Brownian Motion

 Mixing Energy  Primary Particles Stick Together FLOCCULATION

+++ ===

SOLIDS FLOCCULANT FLOC

COAGULATION AND FLOCCULATION

 Coagulation

 Charge Neutralization

 Rapid Mixing (High Shear)

 Promotes Interparticle Collisions  Flocculation

 Bridging of Microflocs

 Slow Mixing (Low Shear)

 Builds Floc Size TYPICAL CLARIFICATION PROGRAM

 Add Cationic Coagulant to Neutralize Anionic Charges on Particles  Add Anionic Flocculant to Bridge Neutralized Particles

NOTES: (1) Coagulants should be be pre-diluted in water for best results (2) Flocculants MUST be pre-diluted in water for any results (3) Add cationic coagulant as far back in the line as possible (4) Do not add anionic flocculant too close to cationic coagulant

Primary / Secondary Wastewater Treatment System

FINAL OR 2’ EFFLUENT 1’ EFF AERATION WASTE SECONDARY PRIMARY BASIN CLARIFIER MIXED LIQUOR WATER

RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE (RAS) WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE (WAS)

PRIMARY SLUDGE SLUDGE DIGESTER or HOLDING TANK

LIQUID PHASE SLUDGE SLUDGE CAKE FILTRATE, CENTRATE, PRESSATE DEWATERING POLYMER CHEMISTRY

VERSATILITY IS A MUST

COAGULANTS EPI / DMA POLYMER AKA EPICHLOROHYDRIN ---DIMETHYLAMINE

OHOHOH CHCHCH 333

------CHCHCH ---CH ---CHCHCH ---N- NNN+++ ------[]222 222 n --- CHCHCH 333 ClClCl

CAS NUMBER: 42751-79-1

POLY [DADMAC] POLYMER AKA POLY DIALLYLDIMETHYL AMMONIUM CHLORIDE AKA POLY [DMDAAC]

------CHCHCH ---CH ---- CH ---CHCHCH ------[ 222 222 ] n HHH222CCC CHCHCH 222

NNN+++ ...... ClClCl ---

HHH333CCCCHCHCH 333

CAS NUMBER: 26062-79-3 INORGANIC COAGULANTS

 Aluminum Sulfate: Al 222(SO 444)))333  Aluminum Chloride: AlCl 333  Polyaluminum Chloride (PAC)  Aluminum Chlorohydrate (ACH)  Ferric Chloride: FeCl 333  Ferric Sulfate: Fe 222(SO 444)))333  Ferrous Sulfate: FeSO 444  Sodium Aluminate: Na 222AlAlAl 222OOO444

HYDROLYSIS OF ALUMINUM (III)

1,1 1,0 1,4

1,2

Log Soluble [Al] SolubleLog 1,3

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 System pH HYDROLYSIS OF IRON (III)

1,0 1,1

1,2 1,4 Log Soluble [Al] SolubleLog 1,3

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 System pH

DEPRESSION OF SYSTEM pH WITH ALUMINUM or FERRIC SALTS

DOSAGE OF CALCULATED 28% ACTIVE FINAL pH

1 ppm 5.2

10 ppm 4.2

100 ppm 3.2

1000 ppm 2.2

ASSUMES UNBUFFERED WATER STARTING AT pH = 7.0 ORGANIC COAGULANTS ADVANTAGES OVER INORGANICS

 Sludge Volume Reduction  Larger, More Stable Floc  Less Pinfloc and Carryover  Lower Flocculant Requirements  Work Over Wide pH Range (2(2----12)12)  Do Not Change System pH  Lower Caustic Requirements

INORGANIC COAGULANTS ADVANTAGES OVER ORGANICS

 Inorganics Can Produce Very Low Waters Because the Metal Hydroxides Can Sweep Fine Particles from Suspension  Low Price per Pound Looks Very Attractive to Purchasing Agents FLOCCULANTS

NONIONIC MONOMER ACRYLAMIDE

O

CH 2 = CH - C - NH 2

AM ANIONIC MONOMER ACRYLIC ACID

O _ …… + CH 2 = CH - C – O H

AA

CATIONIC MONOMERS AETAC ADAME.MeCl QQQ-Q---9999

+ POLYACRYLAMIDE

CHCHCH 222 ---CHCHCH- CH ---CHCHCH 222 ---CH ---CHCHCH 222 ---CHCHCH C=O C=O C=O

NHNHNH 222 NHNHNH 2 NHNHNH 222

POLYMER SHORTHAND POLYACRYLAMIDE

HHH

CHCHCH 222 –––C– CCC C=O

NHNHNH 222 n n is about 282,000 @ 20 million Molecular Weight HOMOPOLYMERIZATION YELLOW = ACRYLAMIDE

FLOCCULANTS ARE TYPICALLY 200,000+ MONOMERS

ANIONIC POLYACRYLAMIDE COPOLYMER aka AM/SA ANIONIC POLYACRYLAMIDE

HHH HHH

CHCHCH 222 –––C CHCHCH 222 ---C- CCC C=O C=O

NHNHNH OOO 222 m NaNaNa + n RANDOM COPOLYMER m + n = 1

COPOLYMERIZATION YELLOW = ACRYLAMIDE; RED = ACRYLATE 25% ANIONIC CHARGE COPOLYMERIZATION YELLOW = ACRYLAMIDE; RED = ACRYLATE 50% ANIONIC CHARGE

CATIONIC POLYACRYLAMIDE COPOLYMER aka AM/Q9 CATIONIC POLYACRYLAMIDE

HHH R’R’R’

CHCHCH 222 –––C CHCHCH 222 ---C- CCC C=O C=O

NHNHNH 222 OOO m

(CH 222)))222 + RANDOM COPOLYMER HHH3C NNN CHCHCH 333 m + n = 1 n CHCHCH 333 Cl

COPOLYMERIZATION YELLOW = ACRYLAMIDE; BLUE = CAT 10% CATIONIC CHARGE COPOLYMERIZATION YELLOW = ACRYLAMIDE; BLUE = CAT 25% CATIONIC CHARGE

COPOLYMERIZATION YELLOW = ACRYLAMIDE; BLUE = CAT 50% CATIONIC CHARGE TYPICAL MOL-WT DISTRIBUTION

RESIDUAL THIS PRODUCT WOULD HAVE AN AVG MOL-WT MONOMER OF ~7 MILLION NUMBER OF MOLECULES OF NUMBER

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415

MOLECULAR WEIGHT IN MILLIONS

TYPICAL MOL-WT DISTRIBUTIONS

CATIONICS ANIONICS NUMBER OF MOLECULES OF NUMBER

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

MOLECULAR WEIGHT IN MILLIONS LINEAR POLYMER STRUCTURE

LIGHTLY BRANCHED POLYMER STRUCTURE HIGHLY BRANCHED POLYMER STRUCTURE

CROSSCROSS----LINKEDLINKED POLYMER STRUCTURE ASHLAND WATER TECHNOLOGIES EMULSION POLYMER PRODUCT LINE 20

18

16

14

12

10

8 RELATIVE MOLECULAR WEIGHT MOLECULAR RELATIVE 6

4 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80

RELATIVE POLYMER CHARGE

GENERAL INDUSTRIAL COAGULANT AIDS 20

18

16

14

12

10

8 RELATIVE MOLECULAR WEIGHT MOLECULAR RELATIVE 6

4 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80

RELATIVE POLYMER CHARGE MINING FLOCCULANTS 20

18

16

14

12

10

8 RELATIVE MOLECULAR WEIGHT MOLECULAR RELATIVE 6

4 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80

RELATIVE POLYMER CHARGE

LOW pH SYSTEM FLOCCULANTS 20

18

16

14

12

10

8 RELATIVE MOLECULAR WEIGHT MOLECULAR RELATIVE 6

4 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80

RELATIVE POLYMER CHARGE BIOSOLIDS DEWATERING FLOCCULANTS 20

18

16

14

12

10

8 RELATIVE MOLECULAR WEIGHT MOLECULAR RELATIVE 6

4 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80

RELATIVE POLYMER CHARGE

DEWATERING VERY YOUNG HIGH F/M PURE BIOSLUDGES 20

18

16

14

12

10

8 RELATIVE MOLECULAR WEIGHT MOLECULAR RELATIVE 6

4 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80

RELATIVE POLYMER CHARGE MIXED PRIMARY/SECONDARY DEWATERING FLOCCULANTS 20

18

16

14

12

10

8 RELATIVE MOLECULAR WEIGHT MOLECULAR RELATIVE 6

4 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80

RELATIVE POLYMER CHARGE

PAPER MILL SLUDGE DEWATERING FLOCCULANTS 20

18

16

14

12

10

8 RELATIVE MOLECULAR WEIGHT MOLECULAR RELATIVE 6

4 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80

RELATIVE POLYMER CHARGE PAPER MILL PRIMARY TREATMENT

20

18

16

14

12

10

8 RELATIVE MOLECULAR WEIGHT MOLECULAR RELATIVE 6

4 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80

RELATIVE POLYMER CHARGE

WATER & WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAB TESTS PREPARING SOLUTIONS

 Organic, Inorganic & Blended Coagulants

 Recommended Concentration: 1 ---10%

 Use Correction Due to High Density  Emulsion Flocculants

 Recommended Concentration: 0.50 ---1.50%

 Density Correction Unnecessary  Dry Flocculants

 Recommended Concentration: 0.10 ---0.50%

 Requires Accurate Balance ( +/+/----0.01 g Minimum)

PROCEDURE FOR 1% COAGULANT SOLUTIONS

 Fill a 4 oz Bottle with 99 mls of Water  Determine Volume of Coagulant = 1.0 gram

 VOL = 1 / ρ ;ρ ; Where ρ = Specific Gravity

 Specific Gravity; ρ = D / 8.34 ; Where D = lbs/gal  Add Coagulant to the Water and Cap Bottle  Shake Well Until Dissolved (~30 sec) PROCEDURE FOR 0.5% EMULSION POLYMERS

 Shake Neat Emulsion Polymer Sample Very Well  Fill an 8 oz Bottle with 99.5 mls of Tap Water  Inject 0.5 mls into the Water and Cap Quickly  Shake Vigorously for at Least 2 min  Let Stand for 30 min; Shaking 1 min every 10 min  PostPost----DiluteDilute to any Convenient Concentration

PROCEDURE FOR 0.25% DRY POLYMERS  Place 399 mls Water in a 600 ml Beaker  Clamp Beaker to Keep from Moving  Set Mechanical Stirrer Speed to 400 rpm  Sift 1.00 grams of Dry Polymer into Vortex Over a 20 sec Period to Avoid Fisheyes  Mix for at Least 1 hour at 400 rpm

 If Mixing on a Jar Tester or Magnetic Stirrer, Check for Fisheyes or Lumps by Pouring Out Solution and Mix Longer, If Necessary REMEMBER ONLY ONE FORMULA 1 cc Of a 1 % Product Solution in a 1000 ml Test Volume is a

10 ppm Dosage

THE REST CAN BE OBTAINED BY SIMPLE RATIO

CLARIFICATION & SETTLING TESTS JAR TEST APPARATUS

RPM GAUGE

GANG STIRRER

BEAKERS

LIGHT BOX

LAB / FIELD DAF UNIT

MIXER NEEDLE GAUGE VALVE 120 VAC 2000 ml PLEXIGLAS CYLINDER SEARS WATER FILTER SAMPLE 150 psi AIR PORT PUMP OTHER LIQUIDLIQUID----SOLIDSSOLIDS SEPARATION LAB EQUIPMENT

CYLINDER SETTLEOMETER IMHOFF SETTLING CONE

WHICH THICKENING TEST METHOD TO USE

 CYLINDER SETTLING: Good for the Accurate Measurement of the Initial Settling Rate of Slurries with a High Enough Concentration to Observe an Interface  SETTLEOMETER: Good for the Determination of Sludge Volume Index (SVI) in Activated Sludge Plants (aka Biological Oxidation Systems)  IMHOFF CONE: Good for Determining the Final Sludge Volume of Systems Where the Final Sludge Volume is Less Than 10% of the Initial Volume. SLUDGE THICKENING AND DEWATERING

DEWATERING METHODS

 BELT PRESS  CENTRIFUGE  PLATE AND FRAME PRESS  VACUUM FILTER

 ROTARY

 HORIZONTAL  SCREW PRESS  BEDS POLYMER PRESS

FREE DRAINAGE SECTION HEADBOX

FILTRATE COLLECTION

PRESS SECTION DRY CAKE FILTRATE

BELT FILTRATE WASH

TOP OF BELT

HEADBOX ROTARY SCREEN THICKENER

POLYMER

INCOMING SLUDGE

THICKENED SLUDGE

CENTRIFUGE LINE DIAGRAM

BEACH

LIQUID SLUDGE IN MOTOR SCROLL

POLYMER

SLUDGE CENTRATE CAKE OUT

PLATE AND FRAME FILTER PRESS

HYDRAULICS

FILTRATE

SLUDGE

FILTRATE ROTARY VACUUM FILTER

FILTRATE RECEIVER TRAP DRY CAKE DISCHARGE

POLYMER VACUUM DRUM

VAT

LIQUID SLUDGE

ROCKER ARM (10-30 reps/min)

WET SLUDGE Screw Press IN OUTSIDE VIEW

PRESSURE HEADBOX PLATE

PERFORATED CYLINDRICAL SCREEN w/ 1-4 mm HOLES

SCREW MOTOR

PRESSATE COLLECTION DRY CAKE OUT WET SLUDGE Screw Press IN INSIDE VIEW

PRESSURE PLATE

SCREW GETS WIDER IN DIAMETER TO PUSH SLUDGE AGAINST SCREEN

SCREW MOTOR

PRESSATE COLLECTION DRY CAKE OUT

ROTARY SCREEN SLUDGE THICKENER SCREW PRESS WITH ROTARY

POLYMER SCREEN THICKENER

FILTRATE COLLECTION SCREW PRESS

SCREW MOTOR

CAKE PRESSATE LAB TESTS FOR DEWATERING

FREE DRAINAGE TESTS

4” PIPE NIPPLE

FILTER SCREEN GRADUATED CYLINDER BUCHNER FUNNEL COMPUTERIZED FREE DRAINAGE TESTS

RS-232 BALANCE SERIAL

SLUDGE DEWATERING MIXING FOR R&D PROJECTS

¼” SHAFT 200-250 RPM

1.5” DIAMETER ¾” APART IMPELLERS

d d should be as small as possible THE DREWPRESS

- YIELDS FREE DRAINAGE RATE - CAN BE COMPUTERIZED - YIELDS FILTRATE QUALITY - CAKE COMPRESSABILITY - SOLIDS EXTRUSION POTENTIAL - CAKE RELEASE DATA - FINAL CAKE SOLIDS

ORIGINALLY DEVELOPED BY BELT PRESS MANUFACTURERS FOR SELECTION OF FILTER MEDIA. WE ADAPTED FOR POLYMER SELECTION



Capillary Suction Test (CST)

STAINLESS TIMER STEEL CYLINDER BOX

SENSOR BLOCK

CST PAPER CST ---SENSOR BLOCK FROM TOP

TO TIMER

INNER RING

SLUDGE

OUTER CST RING PAPER

VACUUM BUCHNER FUNNEL TESTS

FILTER PAPER

BUCHNER GAUGE FUNNEL

RUBBER STOPPER

GRADUATED VACUUM CYLINDER PUMP W/ SIDEARM TRAP FILTER LEAF TESTS

FILTER CLOTH VACUUM FILTER GAUGE LEAF RUBBER HOSE

VACUUM PUMP SLUDGE

TRAP Sludge Dewatering Recommended Test Method

Belt Press Free Drainage Test or DREWPRESS®

Centrifuge Free Drainage Test versus Shear

Plate & Frame Press Vacuum Buchner Funnel Test or CST

Vacuum Filter Filter Leaf Test or CST

Screw Press Free Drainage Test or DREWPRESS®

Drying Beds Free Drainage Test

Free Drainage Tests

140 120 100 DF-403 80 DF-439-GR 60 DF-2478 DF-2488 40 20 Drainage @ sec: 15 Drainage mls 0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 Polymer Dosage: lbs/ton Free Drainage Tests

140 120 100 DF-403 80 DF-439-GR 60 DF-2478 40 DF-2488 20

Drainage @ 15 sec: mls sec: 15 @ Drainage 0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 Polymer Cost: $/ton

OTHER DEWATERING CALCULATIONS

Percent Capture: C = (1- Sf /S i) * 100

where S f = Filtrate Solids % and S i = Incoming Solids % FINAL CAKE SOLIDS

Cake Solids = (DW-P) / (WW-P)*100

Where: DW = Dry Cake Weight + Pan WW = Wet cake Weight + Pan P = Pan Tare Weight

Case History INCREASING CENTRIFUGE CAKE SOLIDS

 Client Averages 25 Dry Tons per Day  Disposal Cost = $45 per Wet Ton

 Current Solids Averaged 20.5%  Polymer Dosage Averaged 10.2 lbs/ton  Polymer Cost = $1.60/lb

 New Polymer = $1.75/lb  New Polymer Dosage Averaged 15.3 lbs/ton  New Sludge Solids Averaged 22.9% Net Savings = $314/day = $114,525/yr Effect of Increasing Cake Solids on Dewatering Economics

Original New Parameter Program Program Units Sludge Throughput 25.0 25.0 Dry Tons per Day Sludge Cake Solids 20.50 # 22.90 Percent Sludge Disposal Cost 45.00 45.00 Dollars per Wet Ton Polymer Dosage 10.20 15.30 Pounds per Dry Ton Polymer Cost 1.60 1.75 Dollars per Pound Disposal Cost 5487.80 4912.66 Dollars per Day Chemical Cost 408.00 669.38 Dollars per Day Total Cost 5895.80 5582.04 Dollars per Day

$ 314 Savings per Day

Cost Breakdown

Disposal Polymer $5,488 to $4,913 per Day $408 to $669 per Day Savings = $575 per Day Increase = $261 per Day

$575 Savings on Disposal ---261 Increase on Polymer ======$314 Net Savings on Polymer Switch Hurdles to Implementation

 Purchasing objected to the higher cost of the polymer and wouldn’t give an inch  The disposal charges appeared on the Operations budget  Implementation would make Purchasing look bad and Operations look good  We eventually had to sell the program to the President of the company

EFFECT OF INCREASING CAKE SOLIDS ON THE ECONOMICS OF DEWATERING EFFECT OF BRANCHING ON DRAINAGE TIME

100 90 80 70 60 DF-2465 BRANCHED 50

40 DF-2468 LINEAR 30 20 10

FREE DRAINAGE TIME: sec TIME: DRAINAGE FREE 0 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00

POLYMER COST: $/US Ton

EFFECT OF BRANCHING ON CAKE SOLIDS

30

25 DF-2465 BRANCHED

DF-2468 LINEAR 20

15 CAKE SOLIDS: SOLIDS: % CAKE

10 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00

POLYMER COST: $/US Ton Plant with 20 Dry Tons per Day and Disposal Cost of $20 per Wet Ton

400,000 350,000 Increases are in Absolute Percentages. 300,000 Example:

3% Increase in Cake Solids 11% to 13% is 2% Absolute 250,000 Increase in Cake Solids. Savings is $204,000/yr 200,000 2% Increase 150,000

100,000 1% Increase

Disposal Savings : : $/year Savings Disposal 50,000 0 10 12 14 16 18 20 Initial Cake Solids: %