DOCSLIB.ORG

REPUBLIC of MACEDONIA the GOVERNMENT of REPUBLIC of MACEDONIA NATIONAL STRATEGY for INTEGRATED BORDER MANAGEMENT • Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REPUBLIC of MACEDONIA the GOVERNMENT of REPUBLIC of MACEDONIA NATIONAL STRATEGY for INTEGRATED BORDER MANAGEMENT • Project REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA THE GOVERNMENT OF REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR INTEGRATED BORDER MANAGEMENT • Project realised by the Inter-ministerial group for managing the project integrated border management • Financed by the EU, managed by the European Agency for reconstruction Skopje, December 2003 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................7 BORDER DESCRIPTION ..........................................................................................10 2.1 HISTORY............................................................................................................10 2.2 NEIGHBORS......................................................................................................10 2.3 OFFICIAL BORDER CROSSINGS ...................................................................11 2.4 GEOGRAPHY AND TOPOGRAPHY ................................................................11 2.5 BORDER ECONOMY........................................................................................11 STRATEGIC CHALLENGES ....................................................................................13 3.1 Conventional military attack..............................................................................13 3.2 Possibility for hostile individuals and groups to enter ......................................13 3.3 INTERNAL CONFLICT.....................................................................................13 3.4 CRIME ...............................................................................................................14 LEGAL ISSUES – INTEGRATED BORDER MANAGEMENT..............................15 4.1 THE SCHENGEN CATALOGUE OF BEST PRACTICES ................................15 4.2 METHODOLOGY FOR CREATION OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...........16 4.3. VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS...................................17 4.4 AIMS: .................................................................................................................17 STATE COMMISSION FOR BORDER MANAGEMENT.......................................18 5.1 Democratic supervision .....................................................................................18 5.2 Tasks and authorizations ...................................................................................18 NATIONAL BORDER POLICE SERVICE...............................................................20 6.1 BACKGROUND.................................................................................................20 6.2 OPERATIVE CONCEPT ...................................................................................21 6.3. NATIONAL BORDER MONITORING SYSTEM ..............................................22 6.4 NATIONAL BORDER MANAGEMENT COORDINATIVE CENTER...............23 6.5 REGIONS OF BORDER POLICE (BASIC COMMAND UNIT) .......................23 6.6 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS .........................................................................24 6.7 RECRUITMENT ................................................................................................24 6.8 SELECTION.......................................................................................................25 6.9 BORDER POLICE PERSONNEL TRAINING...................................................25 6.10 STATEMENT ON THE BORDER POLICE MISSION ....................................26 METHODOLOGY IN THE PROCESS OF UNDERTAKING..................................27 BORDER BRIGADE – BORDER POLICE ...............................................................27 7.1 GENERAL..........................................................................................................27 7.2 PLAN DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................27 NATIONAL BORDER MANAGEMENT COORDINATIVE CENTER..................29 8.1 AIM ....................................................................................................................29 8.2 TASK ..................................................................................................................29 8.3 MANAGEMENT.................................................................................................30 8.4 COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATION........................................30 8.5 LIAISON OFFICERS FROM THE NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES..................31 8.6 URGENT CASES PLANS AND PROCEDURES ...........................................31 BORDER ZONE AND COMPETENCIES OF THE BORDER POLICE..................32 9.1 BORDER ZONE................................................................................................32 DEFINING THE COMPETENCIES – BORDER POLICE AND CUSTOMS ADMINISTRATION...................................................................................................34 10.1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................34 10.2 UNIQUE LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................34 10.3 GOVERNMENTAL POLICY – ROLE AND COMPETENCIES .................34 10.4 BORDER POLICE ..........................................................................................34 10.5 CUSTOMS ADMINISTRATION...................................................................35 COORDINATION OF THE STRATEGIC OPERATIVE POLICY ..........................37 12.2 REPORTING PROCEDURES ........................................................................38 12.3 RISK ANALYSIS............................................................................................38 12.4 NATIONAL BORDER MONITORING SYSTEM AS INFORMATICS SOLUTION..............................................................................................................38 12.5 NATIONAL BORDER MONITORING SYSTEM ........................................39 12.6 NATIONAL COORDINATIVE CENTER .....................................................39 CATEGORIZATION OF THE BORDER CROSSINGS ...........................................40 13.1 NEED OF PRIORITIES IN RESOURCES ALLOCATION ..........................40 13.2 CURRENT SITUATION.................................................................................40 13.3 CONCENTRATING RESOURCES ON SPECIFIC BORDER CROSSING POINTS....................................................................................................................41 13.4 CATEGORIZATION OF THE BORDER CROSSING POINTS...................41 COMPETENCIES AND PROCEDURES AT THE BORDER CROSSING POINTS ......................................................................................................................................43 14.1 CURRENT SITUATION.................................................................................43 14.2 ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES..................................................................43 14.3 ORGANIZATION OF THE BORDER CROSSING POINTS .......................45 14.4 CONTROL AND TRAFFIC FLOW ...............................................................45 14.5 EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................................46 CLOSED VIDEO SUPERVISION SYSTEM (CVSS) ...............................................47 15.1 ESSENTIAL EQUIPMENT ............................................................................47 15.2 INSTALLATION AND CONNECTION........................................................47 15.3 DATA INPUT AND CONTROL ....................................................................47 SEARCH OF COMMERCIAL AND OTHER VEHICLES .......................................48 16.1 NEED OF SEARCH........................................................................................48 16.2 AVOIDING IMPORT TAXES........................................................................48 16.3 ILLEGAL GOODS AND TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS................49 16.4 NEED OF PROFILING, INTELLIGENCE AND PRO-ACTIVE INVESTIGATION...................................................................................................50 ILLEGAL MIGRATION, SMUGGLING AND TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS .......................................................................................................................51 17.1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................51 17.2 SMUGGLING WITH HUMAN BEINGS AND NEED OF CLEAR STRATEGY.............................................................................................................51 17.3 THE ROLE OF THE BORDER POLICE .......................................................52 17.4 NEED OF EXCLUSION OF OTHER AGENCIES FROM THE PROCESS 53 18.1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................54 18.2 PRIMATE OF THE CRIME POLICE ............................................................54 18.3 ROLE OF THE CUSTOM ADMINISTRATION...........................................54 18.4 NEED OF COOPERATION OF THE POLICE AND THE CUSTOMS .......55 18.4 TASKED MIXED TEAMS .............................................................................55 18.6 PRECURSORS – DRUGS AND WEAPONS FOR MASS DESTRUCTIONS ..................................................................................................................................56 RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS ..................................................................................57 19.1 DIRECTORATE FOR RADIATION PROTECTION....................................57 19.2 REGULATIVE RESPONSIBILITY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Police Academy of Montenegro
    PI VOCATIONAL SCHOOL POLICE ACADEMY The Police academy is located in Danilovgrad, Montenegro. It is the only Law Enforcement Educational institution in Montenegro. It was established by the Decision of the Montenegrin Government in March 2006 as a public institution with the status of legal entity. The Police academy was established as a result of the “Montenegrin Police Education Reform“project (2005) and was supported by: International Institutions and Associations; Competent Ministries; NGOs. The goal of Montenegrin Police and other Law Enforcement Agencies is to: Harmonize their activities with European standards; Increase the level of legality, accountability, professionalism and respect of human rights; Provide more efficient response to modern security challenges. The scope of work of the academy is: I - Education, training and professional development of the Police Directorate employees, implemented through: I/a – Basic Police Education; I/b – Supplementary courses for police officers; I/c – Professional and specialized training; I/d – Police management training; I/e – Foreign languages and computer science (ECDL standard). II - Education of the Ministry of Interior and Public Administration employees III - Education of the Customs employees IV - Education of the Penitentiary Institution employees V - Education, training and professional development of the employees dealing with persons and property protection staff – security services VI - Librarian, publishing and research related activities VII - International cooperation. The core task of the Police academy is Basic police education which enables students to gain: policing competences; the basic knowledge for professional and specialized development as well as professional career development. So far 256 cadets have completed Basic Police education. At this moment we are educating 22 cadets.
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts, Components and Ammunition To, from and Across the European Union
    Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT 1 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 © United Nations, 2020. All rights reserved, worldwide. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copy- right holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. UNODC would appreciate receiving a copy of any written output that uses this publication as a source at [email protected]. DISCLAIMERS This report was not formally edited. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC, nor do they imply any endorsement. Information on uniform resource locators and links to Internet sites contained in the present publication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issuance. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website. This document was produced with the financial support of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Border Controls Along the Danube and Its Navigable Tributaries
    EU Strategy for the Danube Region Priority Area 1a – To improve mobility and multimodality: Inland waterways Practical manual on border controls along the Danube and its navigable tributaries Author(s): Milica Gvozdic (viadonau) Simon Hartl (viadonau) Katja Rosner (viadonau) Version (date): 31.08.2015 1 General information .................................................................................................................. 4 2 How to use this manual? .......................................................................................................... 5 3 Geographic scope .................................................................................................................... 5 4 Hungary ................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 General information on border controls ................................................................................... 7 4.1.1 Control process ................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 Control forms ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.3 Additional information ....................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Information on specific border control points ......................................................................... 22 4.2.1 Mohács .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Bulgarian Government on the Visit to Bulgaria Carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture
    CPT/Inf (2004) 21 Report to the Bulgarian Government on the visit to Bulgaria carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 17 to 26 April 2002 The Bulgarian Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government's response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2004) 22. Strasbourg, 24 June 2004 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT's report ............................................................................4 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................5 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................5 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................6 C. Consultations held by the delegation and co-operation encountered...................................7 D. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .........................8 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ................................9 A. Establishments under the authority of the Ministry of Internal Affairs .............................9 1. Preliminary remarks ..........................................................................................................9 2. Torture and other forms of ill-treatment..........................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • EMN Ad-Hoc Query on Intra-Schengen Border Monitoring
    EMN Ad-Hoc Query on Intra-Schengen border monitoring and border control Requested by Dylano de Wilde on 4th June 2018 Border Responses from Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Sweden, United Kingdom, Norway (20 in total) Disclaimer: The following responses have been provided primarily for the purpose of information exchange among EMN NCPs in the framework of the EMN. The contributing EMN NCPs have provided, to the best of their knowledge, information that is up-to-date, objective and reliable. Note, however, that the information provided does not necessarily represent the official policy of an EMN NCPs' Member State. Background information: Over the past couple of years, the Schengen area has come to face several challenges. In particular in response to a range of terrorist attacks as well as the so-called European refugee “crisis”. Member states have used a variety of measures to enhance the monitoring of cross border mobility. These measures are not exclusively taken at the external border of the European Union, but also increasingly at the physical borders between two Schengen States. By, for instance, temporarily reintroducing border checks under Article 29 of the Schengen Border Code (SBC) or by using the possibility to carry out police or immigration checks in a region around the physical border under Article 23 SBC. In the light of one of the core principles of the European Union and the Schengen Agreement, the principle of free movement, the temporary introduction of border checks under article 29 SBC is to be seen as a last resort that can only be justified by exceptional circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation, Smuggling, and Organized Crime
    TRANSPORTATION, SMUGGLING, AND ORGANIZED CRIME CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF DEMOCRACY CSD REPORTS: 1. Bulgaria’s Participation in EU Structural Funds, Sofia, 1999. ISBN 954-477-050-8 2. Social Policy Aspects of Bulgaria’s EU Accession, Sofia, 1999. ISBN 954-477-053-4 3. Preparing for EU Accession Negotiations, Sofia, 1999. ISBN 954-477-055-7 4. The Role of Political Parties in Accession to the EU, Sofia, 1999. ISBN 954-477-055-0 5. Bulgaria’s Capital Markets in the Context of EU Accession: A Status Report, Sofia, 1999. ISBN 954-477-059-3 6. Corruption and Trafficking: Monitoring and Prevention, Sofia, 2000. ISBN 954-477-078-X 7. Establishing Corporate Governance in an Emerging Market: Bulgaria, Sofia, 2000. ISBN 954-477-084-4 9. Corruption and Illegal Trafficking: Monitoring and Prevention, Second, revised and amended edition, Sofia, 2000. ISBN 954-477-087-9 10. Smuggling in Southeast Europe, Sofia, 2002. ISBN 954-477-099-2 11. Corruption, Trafficking and Institutional Reform, Sofia, 2002. ISBN 954-477-101-8 12. The Drug Market in Bulgaria, Sofia, 2003. ISBN 954-477-111-5 13. Partners in Crime: The Risks of Symbiosis between the Security Sector and Organized Crime in Southeast Europe, Sofia, 2004. ISBN 954-477-115-8 14. Weapons under Scrutiny: Implementing Arms Export Controls and Combating Small Arms Proliferation in Bulgaria, Sofia, 2004. ISBN 954-477-117-470 15. Transportation, Smuggling, and Organized Crime, Sofia, 2004. ISBN 954-477-119-0 Editorial Board: Ognian Shentov Boyko Todorov Alexander Stoyanov ISBN 954-477-119-0 ©2004 Center for the Study of Democracy All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria 2020 Human Rights Report
    BULGARIA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Bulgaria is a constitutional republic governed by a freely elected unicameral National Assembly. A coalition government headed by a prime minister leads the country. National Assembly elections were held in 2017, and the Central Election Commission did not report any major election irregularities. International and local observers considered the National Assembly elections and the 2016 presidential election generally free and fair but noted some deficiencies. The Ministry of Interior is responsible for law enforcement, migration, and border control. The State Agency for National Security, which reports to the Prime Minister’s Office, is responsible for investigating corruption and organized crime, among other responsibilities. The army is responsible for external security but also can assist with border security. During the coronavirus-related state of emergency, the army had the authority to enforce COVID-19 measures and restrictions but did not exercise it. The National Protective Service is responsible for the security of dignitaries and answers to the president. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Members of the security forces committed some abuses. Significant human rights issues included: violent treatment by police; arbitrary arrests; serious problems with judicial independence; serious restrictions on free expression, including media censorship, violence and threats of violence against journalists, and corporate and political pressure on media; refoulement of refugees or asylum seekers; serious acts of corruption; crimes involving violence or threats of violence against Roma; violence against children; and crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex persons. Authorities took steps to prosecute and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, but government actions were insufficient, and impunity was a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Marina Caparini and Otwin Marenin
    Introduction Marina Caparini and Otwin Marenin The chapters in this volume originated as papers delivered at the conference ‘Managing International and Inter-Agency Cooperation at the Border’, held in Geneva on 13-15 March 2003. The idea behind organising the conference, and its objective, was to conduct an assessment of recent developments in the governance of border security systems, both within the European region, and comparatively across other regions. Transnational movements of people, goods, and capital have become important security policy items on national and global agendas, and the control of such movements is focused largely on efforts at borders. The powers and reach of border control systems have been enhanced by changes in law, increased political attention, an influx of resources, the utilisation of technological detection and control devices and systems, and a security discourse which stresses border management as crucial element in ensuring the stability of states and the well-being of citizens. In short, as border guards and other state authorities have been given more authority and as their capacity to coercively control people has been magnified, the perennial question of how to control and hold accountable agencies and agents who exercise that power, often within wide margins of discretion, has risen to greater salience. At the same time, the means and mechanisms of accountability must respond to the realities of evolving forms of border management if they are to be effective and legitimate. There are widely acknowledged reasons why borders and the accountability of evolving border control systems now matter. In an era of globally structured change and the increasing interconnections of international and local affairs, advancing integration of even remote societies into a global system of commerce, migration and production is apparent, supported by technologies of communication and transportation far more efficient and more difficult to know about and control than traditional means.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan's Police
    UNITeD StateS INSTITUTe of Peace www.usip.org SPeCIAL RePoRT 1200 17th Street NW • Washington, DC 20036 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPO R T Robert M. Perito The Afghanistan National Police is Afghanistan’s front line of defense against insurgency and organized crime. Yet despite nearly $10 billion in international police assistance, the Afghan police are riddled with corruption and incompetence and are far from the professional law enforcement organization needed Afghanistan’s Police to ensure stability and development. This report details the past failures and current challenges facing the international police assistance program in Afghanistan. It draws conclusions about the prospects for current programs and offers The Weak Link in Security Sector Reform recommendations for corrective action. The report urges that the international community’s approach to police assistance expand to embrace a comprehensive program for security Summary sector reform and the rule of law. • In seven years, the Afghan National Police forces have grown to 68,000 personnel, with The report is based on a conference titled “Policing a target end strength of 86,000. The ANP includes the uniformed police force, which is Afghanistan,” which was hosted by the United States Institute responsible for general police duties, and specialized police forces, which deal with public of Peace’s Security Sector Reform Working Group on May 27, order, counternarcotics, terrorism, and border control. 2009. It draws on the author’s participation in numerous Afghanistan-related conferences, interviews, workshops, and • Despite the impressive growth in numbers, the expenditure of $10 billion in international study groups; on his two visits to the country; and on an police assistance, and the involvement of the United States, the European Union, and extensive review of the literature on the Afghanistan police multiple donors, the ANP is riddled with corruption and generally unable to protect Afghan development program.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Practices in the Area of Border Security and Management in the Context of Counterterrorism and Stemming the Flow of “Foreign Terrorist Fighters”
    Good Practices in the Area of Border Security and Management in the Context of Counterterrorism and Stemming the Flow of “Foreign Terrorist Fighters” Preface Terrorist groups and transnational criminal organizations continue to illegally cross porous land borders to traffic small arms and light weapons (SALW), ammunition and explosives, drugs, contraband, other illicit goods, and human beings, as well as deploy terrorist operatives to conduct attacks. Such activities undermine States’ efforts to counter terrorism and restrict cross- border organized crime, increase the vulnerability of affected populations, and provide financing to terrorist and criminal networks in ways that adversely affect international peace and security. Members of terrorist and transnational organized crime groups, as well as “foreign terrorist fighters” (FTFs), target the gaps of weak border infrastructure and continue to exploit with impunity porous and uncontrolled borders. FTFs make use of forged and/or fraudulently obtained travel documents and visas or abuse genuine travel documents of others, in order to cross international borders to conduct attacks or join extremist groups elsewhere. It is the obligation of every Member State to prevent the travel of FTFs, just as it is imperative for States’ mutual security to stand against violent extremist groups such as Al-Qa’ida, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, and their affiliates. 1 Border demarcation or delimitation issues between States may complicate border security and management (BSM) related issues. Exercising sovereign jurisdiction through routine border operations at green and blue borders 2 may lead to an escalation of demarcation matters if they are under dispute. At the same time, exercising caution in this regard could help terrorist organizations cross borders more easily.
    [Show full text]
  • Organized Crime in Bulgaria: Markets and Trends
    ORGANIZED CRIME IN BULGARIA: MARKETS AND TRENDS ���������� ������������ ��������� The present report builds upon various studies published by the Center for the Study of Democracy throughout the last decade which have focused on specific aspects of organized crime in Bulgaria (contraband, the drug market, tax fraud, human trafficking, arms proliferation, etc.), the systemic spread of corruption, and the linkages between the two. The report presents the latest trends and manifestations (or “market niches”) of syndicate crime and its particularly damaging effects. It goes further to offer a historical review of the facts and available expertise in the area, and to draw conclusions about the origin, characteristics and developmental features of organized criminality in Bulgaria in the context of the transition to democracy. This report attempts to present an authentic picture of organized crime in Bulgaria, by identifying its constitu- ent features and major trends. The research team has used information from all available sources, analyzing it through several, complementary methods. Collecting empirical data about clandestine and hidden markets is a hard task, which can sometimes put the researchers at risk. However, it cannot be dispensed with, particularly as the so called objective data (police and judicial crime statistics) provided by public bodies is often incomplete and sometimes manipulated. This paper also furthers expertise exchange through a public-private partnership. This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Center for the Study of Deocracy and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. The report is published with the financial support of the US Department of Justice Editorial Board Ognian Shentov Boyko Todorov Alexander Stoyanov ISBN 978-954-477-150-8 © 2007, Center for the Study of Democracy All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paradox of Gendarmeries: Between Expansion, Demilitarization and Dissolution
    0088 CCOUVERTUREOUVERTURE pp1X.ai1X.ai 1 229-10-139-10-13 33:49:51:49:51 PPMM SSR PAPER 8 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K The Paradox of Gendarmeries: Between Expansion, Demilitarization and Dissolution Derek Lutterbeck DCAF DCAF a centre for security, development and the rule of law SSR PAPER 8 The Paradox of Gendarmeries: Between Expansion, Demilitarization and Dissolution Derek Lutterbeck DCAF The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international community in pursuing good governance and reform of the security sector. The Centre develops and promotes norms and standards, conducts tailored policy research, identifies good practices and recommendations to promote democratic security sector governance, and provides in‐country advisory support and practical assistance programmes. SSR Papers is a flagship DCAF publication series intended to contribute innovative thinking on important themes and approaches relating to security sector reform (SSR) in the broader context of security sector governance (SSG). Papers provide original and provocative analysis on topics that are directly linked to the challenges of a governance‐driven security sector reform agenda. SSR Papers are intended for researchers, policy‐makers and practitioners involved in this field. ISBN 978‐92‐9222‐286‐4 © 2013 The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces EDITORS Heiner Hänggi & Albrecht Schnabel PRODUCTION Yury Korobovsky COPY EDITOR Cherry Ekins COVER IMAGES © ‘Gendarmerie Line’ by Mike Baker, ‘French Gendarmerie being trained by Belgian Soldiers in IEDs in Afghanistan’ by unidentified government source, ‘Guardia Civil’ by Joaquim Pol, ‘Carabinieri’ by hhchalle The views expressed are those of the author(s) alone and do not in any way reflect the views of the institutions referred to or represented within this paper.
    [Show full text]