DOCSLIB.ORG

Report to the Bulgarian Government on the Visit to Bulgaria Carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report to the Bulgarian Government on the Visit to Bulgaria Carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture CPT/Inf (2004) 21 Report to the Bulgarian Government on the visit to Bulgaria carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 17 to 26 April 2002 The Bulgarian Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government's response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2004) 22. Strasbourg, 24 June 2004 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT's report ............................................................................4 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................5 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................5 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................6 C. Consultations held by the delegation and co-operation encountered...................................7 D. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .........................8 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ................................9 A. Establishments under the authority of the Ministry of Internal Affairs .............................9 1. Preliminary remarks ..........................................................................................................9 2. Torture and other forms of ill-treatment..........................................................................10 3. Safeguards against the ill-treatment of persons deprived of their liberty........................15 4. Conditions of detention ...................................................................................................19 a. police cells..............................................................................................................19 b. detention facilities of the National Border Police Service at the Regional border sector in Petrich .................................................................20 B. Establishments under the authority of the Ministry of Justice ..........................................22 1. Investigation detention facilities......................................................................................22 a. preliminary remarks ...............................................................................................22 b. ill-treatment ............................................................................................................22 c. conditions of detention...........................................................................................23 d. health-care services ................................................................................................26 e. other issues .............................................................................................................27 2. Prisons .............................................................................................................................28 a. preliminary remarks ...............................................................................................28 b. ill-treatment ............................................................................................................29 c. conditions of detention...........................................................................................30 i. Burgas Prison ...............................................................................................30 ii. Pleven Prison................................................................................................32 - 3 - iii. life-sentenced prisoners ................................................................................34 iv. reception/transit cells at Sofia Prison ..........................................................35 d. health-care services ................................................................................................36 e. other issues related to the CPT’s mandate .............................................................38 i. prison staff ....................................................................................................38 ii. contact with the outside world......................................................................39 iii. discipline.......................................................................................................40 iv. complaints and inspection procedures .........................................................41 C. Establishments under the authority of the Ministry of Public Health...............................43 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................43 2. Ill-treatment .....................................................................................................................43 3. Patients' living conditions................................................................................................44 4. Treatment and staff..........................................................................................................47 5. Means of restraint ............................................................................................................49 6. Safeguards .......................................................................................................................50 D. Establishments under the authority of the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy ...........54 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................54 2. Ill-treatment .....................................................................................................................54 3. Living conditions and care of residents...........................................................................55 4. Means of restraint ............................................................................................................59 5. Safeguards .......................................................................................................................59 E. Establishments under the authority of the Ministry of Education.....................................61 F. Establishments under the authority of the Ministry of Defence.........................................63 III. RECAPITULATION AND CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................65 APPENDIX I : LIST OF THE CPT'S RECOMMENDATIONS, COMMENTS AND REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION ...........................................................................72 APPENDIX II : LIST OF THE NATIONAL AUTHORITIES AND NON- GOVERNMENTAL AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATONS WITH WHICH THE DELEGATION HELD CONSULTATIONS ..................................90 - 4 - Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT's report Strasbourg, 6 December 2002 Dear Mrs Vassileva, In pursuance of Article 10, paragraph 1, of the European Convention for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, I enclose herewith the report to the Bulgarian Government drawn up by the European Committee for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (CPT) after its visit to Bulgaria from 17 to 26 April 2002. The report was adopted by the CPT at its 49th meeting, held from 5 to 8 November 2002. I would draw your attention to paragraph 231 of the report, in which the CPT requests the Bulgarian authorities to provide within six months a response setting out the action taken upon its visit report. As regards the State Psychiatric Hospital in Karlukovo, the Committee has requested confirmation within one month that patients are provided with food of sufficient quantity and quality. The CPT would be grateful if it were possible, in the event of the response due within six months being in Bulgarian, for it to be accompanied by an English or French translation. It would also be most helpful if the Bulgarian authorities could provide a copy of the responses in a computer- readable form. I am at your entire disposal if you have any questions concerning either the CPT's visit report or the future procedure. Yours sincerely, Silvia CASALE President of the European Committee for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment Mrs Galina VASSILEVA Ministry of Justice Main Directorate for the Execution of Punishments 21, Boulevard Stoletov 1309 Sofia Bulgaria - 5 - I. INTRODUCTION A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation 1. In accordance with Article 7 of the European Convention for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"), a delegation of the CPT visited Bulgaria from 17 to 26 April 2002. The visit was organised within the framework of the CPT’s programme of periodic visits for 2002 and was the Committee’s third visit to Bulgaria.1 2. The visit was carried out by the following members of the CPT: - Silvia CASALE, President of the CPT (Head of the delegation) - Mario FELICE - Yuri KUDRYAVTSEV - Ingrid LYCKE ELLINGSEN (from 17 to 21 April 2002) - Veronica PIMENOFF - Eric SVANIDZE. They were assisted by: - Enda DOOLEY, Director of Prison Health Care, Irish Prison Service, Dublin, Ireland (expert) - Clive MEUX, consultant forensic psychiatrist, Oxford, United Kingdom (expert) (from 21 to 26 April 2002) - Mois BELLO (interpreter) - Nedialka
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

86 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: BULGARIA October 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Bulgaria (Republika Bŭlgariya). Short Form: Bulgaria. Term for Citizens(s): Bulgarian(s). Capital: Sofia. Click to Enlarge Image Other Major Cities (in order of population): Plovdiv, Varna, Burgas, Ruse, Stara Zagora, Pleven, and Sliven. Independence: Bulgaria recognizes its independence day as September 22, 1908, when the Kingdom of Bulgaria declared its independence from the Ottoman Empire. Public Holidays: Bulgaria celebrates the following national holidays: New Year’s (January 1); National Day (March 3); Orthodox Easter (variable date in April or early May); Labor Day (May 1); St. George’s Day or Army Day (May 6); Education Day (May 24); Unification Day (September 6); Independence Day (September 22); Leaders of the Bulgarian Revival Day (November 1); and Christmas (December 24–26). Flag: The flag of Bulgaria has three equal horizontal stripes of white (top), green, and red. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early Settlement and Empire: According to archaeologists, present-day Bulgaria first attracted human settlement as early as the Neolithic Age, about 5000 B.C. The first known civilization in the region was that of the Thracians, whose culture reached a peak in the sixth century B.C. Because of disunity, in the ensuing centuries Thracian territory was occupied successively by the Greeks, Persians, Macedonians, and Romans. A Thracian kingdom still existed under the Roman Empire until the first century A.D., when Thrace was incorporated into the empire, and Serditsa was established as a trading center on the site of the modern Bulgarian capital, Sofia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Police Academy of Montenegro
    PI VOCATIONAL SCHOOL POLICE ACADEMY The Police academy is located in Danilovgrad, Montenegro. It is the only Law Enforcement Educational institution in Montenegro. It was established by the Decision of the Montenegrin Government in March 2006 as a public institution with the status of legal entity. The Police academy was established as a result of the “Montenegrin Police Education Reform“project (2005) and was supported by: International Institutions and Associations; Competent Ministries; NGOs. The goal of Montenegrin Police and other Law Enforcement Agencies is to: Harmonize their activities with European standards; Increase the level of legality, accountability, professionalism and respect of human rights; Provide more efficient response to modern security challenges. The scope of work of the academy is: I - Education, training and professional development of the Police Directorate employees, implemented through: I/a – Basic Police Education; I/b – Supplementary courses for police officers; I/c – Professional and specialized training; I/d – Police management training; I/e – Foreign languages and computer science (ECDL standard). II - Education of the Ministry of Interior and Public Administration employees III - Education of the Customs employees IV - Education of the Penitentiary Institution employees V - Education, training and professional development of the employees dealing with persons and property protection staff – security services VI - Librarian, publishing and research related activities VII - International cooperation. The core task of the Police academy is Basic police education which enables students to gain: policing competences; the basic knowledge for professional and specialized development as well as professional career development. So far 256 cadets have completed Basic Police education. At this moment we are educating 22 cadets.
    [Show full text]
  • English and INTRODACTION
    CHANGES AND CONTINUITY IN EVERYDAY LIFE IN ALBANIA, BULGARIA AND MACEDONIA 1945-2000 UNDERSTANDING A SHARED PAST LEARNING FOR THE FUTURE 1 This Teacher Resource Book has been published in the framework of the Stability Pact for South East Europe CONTENTS with financial support from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It is available in Albanian, Bulgarian, English and INTRODACTION..............................................3 Macedonian language. POLITICAL LIFE...........................................17 CONSTITUTION.....................................................20 Title: Changes and Continuity in everyday life in Albania, ELECTIONS...........................................................39 Bulgaria and Macedonia POLITICAL PERSONS..............................................50 HUMAN RIGHTS....................................................65 Author’s team: Terms.................................................................91 ALBANIA: Chronology........................................................92 Adrian Papajani, Fatmiroshe Xhemali (coordinators), Agron Nishku, Bedri Kola, Liljana Guga, Marie Brozi. Biographies........................................................96 BULGARIA: Bibliography.......................................................98 Rumyana Kusheva, Milena Platnikova (coordinators), Teaching approches..........................................101 Bistra Stoimenova, Tatyana Tzvetkova,Violeta Stoycheva. ECONOMIC LIFE........................................103 MACEDONIA: CHANGES IN PROPERTY.......................................104
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria Page 1 of 14
    2005 Country Report on Human Rights in Bulgaria Page 1 of 14 Facing the Threat Posed by Iranian Regime | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Bulgaria Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Bulgaria is a parliamentary democracy of approximately 7.7 million persons, and is ruled by a coalition government headed by Prime Minister Sergei Stanishev. Multiparty parliamentary elections in June were deemed generally free and fair despite some reported irregularities. While civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of law enforcement officers, there were some instances in which law enforcement officers acted independently of government authority. The government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, there were problems in several areas. The following human rights problems were reported: police abuses, including beatings and mistreatment, of criminal suspects, prison inmates, and members of minorities harsh conditions in prisons and detention facilities arbitrary arrest and detention impunity limitations on freedom of the press some restrictions on freedom of religion discrimination against certain religious minorities widespread corruption in executive and judicial branches violence and discrimination against women, children, and minority groups, particularly the Roma trafficking in persons discrimination against persons with disabilities child labor RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life Neither the government nor its agents committed any politically motivated killings; however, there were reports that police killed two persons during the year. On November 10, Anguel Dimitrov died while being arrested in a nationwide operation against organized crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts, Components and Ammunition To, from and Across the European Union
    Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT 1 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 © United Nations, 2020. All rights reserved, worldwide. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copy- right holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. UNODC would appreciate receiving a copy of any written output that uses this publication as a source at gfp@un.org. DISCLAIMERS This report was not formally edited. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC, nor do they imply any endorsement. Information on uniform resource locators and links to Internet sites contained in the present publication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issuance. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website. This document was produced with the financial support of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878
    BLOOD TIES BLOOD TIES Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 I˙pek Yosmaog˘lu Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Copyright © 2014 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2014 by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2014 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yosmaog˘lu, I˙pek, author. Blood ties : religion, violence,. and the politics of nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 / Ipek K. Yosmaog˘lu. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5226-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-7924-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Macedonia—History—1878–1912. 2. Nationalism—Macedonia—History. 3. Macedonian question. 4. Macedonia—Ethnic relations. 5. Ethnic conflict— Macedonia—History. 6. Political violence—Macedonia—History. I. Title. DR2215.Y67 2013 949.76′01—dc23 2013021661 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Paperback printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Josh Contents Acknowledgments ix Note on Transliteration xiii Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Border Controls Along the Danube and Its Navigable Tributaries
    EU Strategy for the Danube Region Priority Area 1a – To improve mobility and multimodality: Inland waterways Practical manual on border controls along the Danube and its navigable tributaries Author(s): Milica Gvozdic (viadonau) Simon Hartl (viadonau) Katja Rosner (viadonau) Version (date): 31.08.2015 1 General information .................................................................................................................. 4 2 How to use this manual? .......................................................................................................... 5 3 Geographic scope .................................................................................................................... 5 4 Hungary ................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 General information on border controls ................................................................................... 7 4.1.1 Control process ................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 Control forms ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.3 Additional information ....................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Information on specific border control points ......................................................................... 22 4.2.1 Mohács .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2013 Joint Report of JRC and Directorate-General Environment
    Forest Fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2013 Joint report of JRC and Directorate-General Environment 2 0 1 4 Report EUR 26791 EN European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Contact information Address: Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, TP 261, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy E-mail: effis@jrc.ec.europa.eu Tel.: +39 0332 78 6138 Fax: +39 0332 78 5500 http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ This publication is a Technical Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Legal Notice This publication is a Technical Report by the Joint Research Centre, the European Commission’s in-house science service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policy-making process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. JRC91373 EUR 26791 EN ISBN 978-92-79-39628-1 (print) ISBN 978-92-79-39627-4 (pdf) ISSN 1018-5593 (print) ISSN 1831-9424 (online) doi:10.2788/99870 (online) Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014 © European Union, 2014 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Italy Forest Fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2013 Contacts: JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Environment and Sustainability Land Management and Natural Hazards Unit Guido Schmuck Guido.Schmuck@jrc.ec.europa.eu
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 and Immigration Tracker
    Mobility: Immigration Tracker Impact of COVID-19 on global immigration 18 November 2020 Important notes • This document provides a snapshot of the policy changes that have been announced in jurisdictions around the world in response to the COVID-19 crisis. It is designed to support conversations about policies that have been proposed or implemented in key jurisdictions • Policy changes across the globe are being proposed and implemented on a daily basis. This document is updated on an ongoing basis but not all entries will be up-to-date as the process moves forward. In addition, not all jurisdictions are reflected in this document • Find the most current version of this tracker on ey.com • Please consult with your EY engagement team to check for new updates and new developments EY teams have developed additional trackers to help you follow changes: ► Force Majeure ► Global Mobility ► Global Tax Policy ► Global Trade Considerations ► Labor and Employment Law ► Tax Controversy ► US State and Local Taxes EY professionals are updating the trackers regularly as the situation continues to develop. Page 2 Impact of COVID-19 on Global Immigration Overview/key issues • With the crisis evolving at different stages globally, government authorities continue to implement immigration-related measures to limit the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and protect the health and safety of individuals in and outside of their jurisdictions. • Measures to stem the spread of COVID-19 include the following: • Entry restrictions and heightened admission criteria
    [Show full text]
  • Balkan Wars Between the Lines: Violence and Civilians in Macedonia, 1912-1918
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: BALKAN WARS BETWEEN THE LINES: VIOLENCE AND CIVILIANS IN MACEDONIA, 1912-1918 Stefan Sotiris Papaioannou, Ph.D., 2012 Directed By: Professor John R. Lampe, Department of History This dissertation challenges the widely held view that there is something morbidly distinctive about violence in the Balkans. It subjects this notion to scrutiny by examining how inhabitants of the embattled region of Macedonia endured a particularly violent set of events: the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War. Making use of a variety of sources including archives located in the three countries that today share the region of Macedonia, the study reveals that members of this majority-Orthodox Christian civilian population were not inclined to perpetrate wartime violence against one another. Though they often identified with rival national camps, inhabitants of Macedonia were typically willing neither to kill their neighbors nor to die over those differences. They preferred to pursue priorities they considered more important, including economic advancement, education, and security of their properties, all of which were likely to be undermined by internecine violence. National armies from Balkan countries then adjacent to geographic Macedonia (Bulgaria, Greece, and Serbia) and their associated paramilitary forces were instead the perpetrators of violence against civilians. In these violent activities they were joined by armies from Western and Central Europe during the First World War. Contrary to existing military and diplomatic histories that emphasize continuities between the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War, this primarily social history reveals that the nature of abuses committed against civilians changed rapidly during this six-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • EMN Ad-Hoc Query on Intra-Schengen Border Monitoring
    EMN Ad-Hoc Query on Intra-Schengen border monitoring and border control Requested by Dylano de Wilde on 4th June 2018 Border Responses from Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Sweden, United Kingdom, Norway (20 in total) Disclaimer: The following responses have been provided primarily for the purpose of information exchange among EMN NCPs in the framework of the EMN. The contributing EMN NCPs have provided, to the best of their knowledge, information that is up-to-date, objective and reliable. Note, however, that the information provided does not necessarily represent the official policy of an EMN NCPs' Member State. Background information: Over the past couple of years, the Schengen area has come to face several challenges. In particular in response to a range of terrorist attacks as well as the so-called European refugee “crisis”. Member states have used a variety of measures to enhance the monitoring of cross border mobility. These measures are not exclusively taken at the external border of the European Union, but also increasingly at the physical borders between two Schengen States. By, for instance, temporarily reintroducing border checks under Article 29 of the Schengen Border Code (SBC) or by using the possibility to carry out police or immigration checks in a region around the physical border under Article 23 SBC. In the light of one of the core principles of the European Union and the Schengen Agreement, the principle of free movement, the temporary introduction of border checks under article 29 SBC is to be seen as a last resort that can only be justified by exceptional circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldier, Structure and the Other
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto SOLDIER, STRUCTURE AND THE OTHER SOCIAL RELATIONS AND CULTURAL CATEGORISATION IN THE MEMOIRS OF FINNISH GUARDSMEN TAKING PART IN THE RUSSO- TURKISH WAR, 1877-1878 Teuvo Laitila Dissertation in Cultural Anthropology, University of Helsinki, Finland, 2001 1 ISSN 1458-3186 ISBN (nid.) 952-10-0104-6 ISBN (pdf) 952-10-105-4 Teuvo Laitila 2 ABSTRACT SOLDIER, STRUCTURE AND THE OTHER:SOCIAL RELATIONS AND CULTURAL CATEGORISATION IN THE MEMOIRS OF FINNISH GUARDSMEN TAKING PART IN THE RUSSO-TURKISH WAR, 1877-1878 Teuvo Laitila University of Helsinki, Finland I examine the influence of Finnish tradition (public memory) about the ’correct’ behaviour in war and relative to the other or not-us on the ways the Finnish guardsmen described their experiences in the Russo-Turkish war, 1877-1878. Further, I analyse how the men’s peacetime identity was transformed into a wartime military one due to their battle experiences and encounters with the other (the enemy, the Balkans and its civilian population) and how public memory both shaped this process and was reinterpreted during it. Methodologically I combine Victor Turner’s study of rituals as processes with Maurice Halbwachs’s sociologial insights about what he termed mémoire collective and what I have called public memory, and Eric Dardel’s geographical view about the meaning of space in remembering. My sources are the written recollections of the Finnish guardsmen, both volunteers and professionals. I have broken each recollection (nine together) down into themes (military ideals, views of the enemy, battle, the civilians or Bulgarians, etc.) and analysed them separately, letting every author tell his story about each thema.
    [Show full text]