Wetland Wildlife and Fisheries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wetland Wildlife and Fisheries Wetland Wildlife and Fisheries 238 Animal Adaptations Teacher Instructions Focus/Overview Grade Level The plants and animals that live in wetlands have special Upper Elementary characteristics that help them live in these wet areas. This lesson teaches students how animals survive in their habitat Duration by adapting, or fitting in, to the environment. 50-55 minutes Learning Objectives Setting The students will: The classroom . Describe the behavioral and physical adaptations of a wetland animal Vocabulary . Relate how animal adaptations help them survive in a Adaptation specific habitat Wetland . Design the ultimate wetland animal with wetland Habitat survival adaptations GLEs Science 4th – (S1-E-A1, A3), (LS-E-A3, C1, C2) 5th – (LS-M-C3, D1) English Language Arts 4th – (ELA-1-E5, E6), (ELA-4-E2, E5) 5th – (ELA-1-M1, M3), (ELA-4-M1, M2, M4, M6), (ELA7-M1) Materials List . Wooden craft sticks (to be cut and used as teeth) . Brown towel or brown coat (teacher provides) . Swim fins . Spray bottle with oil written on the side . Gloves . Headphones (to be used as earplugs) . Nose plugs . Goggles . Musk cologne or perfume ( teacher provides) . Paddle Background Information See the General Wetlands Information at the front of the curriculum binder for more information on wetlands and the animals that live in these areas. LSU AgCenter • 4-H Youth Wetlands Program • 2013 239 A habitat is where animals live. Habitats provide food, water and shelter that animals need to survive, but there is more to survival than just what is found in their habitat. Animals also depend on their physical features to help them obtain food, be safe, build homes, withstand weather and attract mates. These features are called physical adaptations and some examples are: . The color of the fur . The thickness or thinness of the fur . The shape of the nose or ears . Horns or antlers that can be used to fight off predators . Chemicals that are sprayed from various body parts to deter predators . Animals may even be poisonous or unpleasant-tasting so that predators soon learn to leave them alone or avoid them. Many animals have developed remarkable defenses to keep from being eaten. For example, grazing animals often feed in herds for protection. When a predator attacks, the animals scatter and run in different directions to confuse the predator and allow time for the animals to escape. These characteristics are called behavioral adaptations and other examples are: . Animals never venture too far from their home in underground dens or thick vegetation; therefore, they can quickly hide when danger approaches . Animals rely on camouflage or the ability to blend in with their surroundings to hide from predators . Animals use their keen senses of sight, smell and hearing to detect danger and escape . Animals are active only at night when it is harder for predators to find them . Animals rely on trickery and copy the defenses of other animals to protect themselves. Wetlands Animals Wetlands are unique habitats that are characterized by the presence of water and saturated soils. This means that plants and animals living in these habitats must have special adaptations in order to survive there. Wetland plants must be suited for survival in soils that remain wet for most of the year. Animals that live in wetlands must have special biological and behavioral characteristics in order to live there. They must be able to use nutrients found in water, protect themselves from their enemies in a wet environment, and survive during times of saturation or drought. These animals are not able to survive in a wetland area unless they adapt or develop the skills necessary to migrate when conditions become undesirable. Here are some examples of animals that live in Louisiana wetlands and the adaptations that help them survive there: Alligator . Webbed hind feet for steering . Bulging eyes which make it look like a log . Protective, armor plated skin LSU AgCenter • 4-H Youth Wetlands Program • 2013 240 Nutria . Webbed hind feet . Eyes, ears, and nostrils are set high on their heads. Teats of the female are located high on the sides, which allows the young to suckle while in the water Crawfish . Breathe through gills . Eyes are on movable stalks to allow sight in different directions. Emit chemical cues to identify one another Louisiana Black Bear . Ability to not eat, drink, urinate, or defecate, in the winter . Claws reach up to 9-12 inches long in order to catch and maintain its diet of fish, berries, and nuts . Possess a very acute sense of smell Brown Pelican . Large bills with a flexible lower pouch that functions both as a fishing net and as a temperature regulation surface . Special air sacs under the skin on the front of its body protect the pelican from the impact of the dozens of dives it makes each day Beaver information (Read out loud to class) The beaver is the largest North American rodent and lives in every state and province in the United States and Canada. Its biological name is Castor canadensis. American Indians called the beaver the “sacred center” of land because of its ability to change the landscape by damming streams and small rivers that enables other wetlands mammals, fish, frogs, turtles, ducks and birds to thrive in the newly constructed wetland habitat. Beavers live in lodges that they build on the banks of rivers and streams from small trees and mud. First, the beaver gnaws down trees and intertwines them to construct a dam, which floods the upstream portion of the river. Beavers then build their home, or lodge, on the bank of the river with the opening to the home underwater, which helps keep them safe from predators. Beavers are great swimmers and can hold their breath for as long as 12 to 15 minutes and can swim underwater up to a mile. Beavers are often confused with another large rodent that is not native to Louisiana, the nutria. Unlike the nutria, beavers have a wide flat tail, which measures 11-15 inches long and 6 inches wide. They use their big tails like a paddle to propel them through the water when swimming and to warn other beavers of danger by slapping it on the water to raise an alarm. Adults are humped-backed and weigh an average of 33 pounds. Beavers have several features besides their tails that help them live in an aquatic habitat. They have webbed feet and special castor glands on their abdomen that produce oil that the beaver rubs onto its fur to waterproof it. Also, their ears and nose have special muscles that allow them to close these openings when underwater. LSU AgCenter • 4-H Youth Wetlands Program • 2013 241 Beavers mate for life during their third year. Both parents care for the baby beavers, called “kits,” which are usually born in the spring. From one to four kits can be in a litter. The kits normally stay with their parents for two years, and yearlings act as babysitters for the new litter. Beavers can live for as long as 19 years and can grow as long as 3 to 4 feet. During their lifetime, beavers are strict vegetarians, eating on the outer layers of many woody trees, such as sweetgum, yellow poplar and willow. In Louisiana, beavers are trapped for their fur, which is part of a fur industry that produces more than 1.3 million pelts a year from nutria, muskrat, mink, otter and beaver. Definitions: Adaptation – The ability of a species to survive in a particular habitat or niche. Any physical changes in an organism that allow it to survive a particular habitat, defend itself from prey or more easily reproduce. Habitat – The natural environment of an organism; place that is natural for the life and growth of an organism Wetland – A low-lying area that is wet year-round or during portions of the year. It is usually able to support types of vegetation typically adapted for saturated soil conditions. Advance Preparation 1. Place all beaver adaptation props in a brown bag or pillow case. 2. Place pictures of a beaver at the front of the classroom. 3. Divide students into groups of no more than 3 or 4. Procedure 1. Tell the students that today we will discuss several animals that live in wetlands and how they are able to survive living in those wetlands. Bring up the vocabulary word adaptation. Can students define adaptation? 2. Use the background information to lead to class discussion on adaptations and wetland animals. 3. Read out loud the background information of a beaver to the class. 4. Ask the students for a volunteer to come to the front of the classroom. This person will be the “new class pet,” a beaver. 5. Take out one prop at a time from the bag. Ask the students what adaptation of a beaver the prop represents. 6. If the student gets it right he or she can help the “new class pet” put on the prop. See list of correct answers for all props. You may have to help students think creatively. 7. Now that students have completely dressed their new class pet and described many typical adaptations of a beaver to a wetland, ask students to once again define a wetland. After getting several student answers, ask them to describe a wetland. You may want to write descriptive words on the blackboard. Good answers would be lots of water, sometimes salty, muddy, different kinds of plants, different kinds of animals, etc. LSU AgCenter • 4-H Youth Wetlands Program • 2013 242 8. Once students have adequately described a wetland, ask the groups to create a fictitious wetland animal.
Recommended publications
  • Skeletal Development and Mineralization Pattern of The
    e Rese tur arc ul h c & a u D q e A v e f l o o Mesa-Rodríguez et al., J Aquac Res Development 2014, 5:6 l p a m n Journal of Aquaculture r e u n o t DOI: 10.4172/2155-9546.1000266 J ISSN: 2155-9546 Research & Development Research Article OpenOpen Access Access Skeletal Development and Mineralization Pattern of the Vertebral Column, Dorsal, Anal and Caudal Fin Complex in Seriola Rivoliana (Valenciennes, 1833) Larvae Mesa-Rodríguez A*, Hernández-Cruz CM, Socorro JA, Fernández-Palacios H, Izquierdo MS and Roo J Aquaculture Research Group, Science and Technology Park, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, P. O. Box 56, 35200 Telde, Canary Islands, Spain Abstract Bone and fins development in Seriola rivoliana were studied from cleared and stained specimens from 3 to 33 days after hatching. The vertebral column began to mineralize in the neural arches at 4.40 ± 0.14 mm Standard Length (SL), continued with the haemal arches and centrums following a cranial-caudal direction. Mineralization of the caudal fin structures started with the caudal rays by 5.12 ± 0.11 mm SL, at the same time that the notochord flexion occurs. The first dorsal and anal fin structures were the hard spines (S), and lepidotrichium (R) by 8.01 ± 0.26 mm SL. The metamorphosis was completed by 11.82 ± 0.4 mm SL. Finally, the fin supports (pterygiophores) and the caudal fins were completely mineralized by 16.1 ± 0.89 mm SL. In addition, the meristic data of 23 structures were provided.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And
    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes THIRD EDITION GSMFC No. 300 NOVEMBER 2020 i Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator R.L. “Bret” Allain, II Chris Blankenship, Commissioner State Senator District 21 Alabama Department of Conservation Franklin, Louisiana and Natural Resources John Roussel Montgomery, Alabama Zachary, Louisiana Representative Chris Pringle Mobile, Alabama MISSISSIPPI Chris Nelson Joe Spraggins, Executive Director Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Mississippi Department of Marine Bon Secour, Alabama Resources Biloxi, Mississippi FLORIDA Read Hendon Eric Sutton, Executive Director USM/Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Florida Fish and Wildlife Ocean Springs, Mississippi Conservation Commission Tallahassee, Florida TEXAS Representative Jay Trumbull Carter Smith, Executive Director Tallahassee, Florida Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas LOUISIANA Doug Boyd Jack Montoucet, Secretary Boerne, Texas Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Baton Rouge, Louisiana GSMFC Staff ASMFC Staff Mr. David M. Donaldson Mr. Bob Beal Executive Director Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mr. Jeffrey Kipp IJF Program Coordinator Stock Assessment Scientist Ms. Debora McIntyre Dr. Kristen Anstead IJF Staff Assistant Fisheries Scientist ii A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes Third Edition Edited by Steve VanderKooy Jessica Carroll Scott Elzey Jessica Gilmore Jeffrey Kipp Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission 2404 Government St Ocean Springs, MS 39564 and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1050 N. Highland Street Suite 200 A-N Arlington, VA 22201 Publication Number 300 November 2020 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA15NMF4070076 and NA15NMF4720399.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkcam Fishes
    SharkCam Fishes A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower By Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie 1 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index Trevor Mendelow, designer of SharkCam, on August 31, 2014, the day of the original SharkCam installation. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition by Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. For questions related to this guide or its usage contact Erin Burge. The suggested citation for this guide is: Burge EJ, CE O’Brien and jon-newbie. 2020. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition. Los Angeles: Explore.org Ocean Frontiers. 201 pp. Available online http://explore.org/live-cams/player/shark-cam. Guide version 5.0. 24 February 2020. 2 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index TABLE OF CONTENTS SILVERY FISHES (23) ........................... 47 African Pompano ......................................... 48 FOREWORD AND INTRODUCTION .............. 6 Crevalle Jack ................................................. 49 IDENTIFICATION IMAGES ...................... 10 Permit .......................................................... 50 Sharks and Rays ........................................ 10 Almaco Jack ................................................. 51 Illustrations of SharkCam
    [Show full text]
  • Notice Calling for Suggestions, Views, Comments Etc from WTO- SPS Committee Members Within a Period of 60 Days on the Draft Noti
    Notice Calling for suggestions, views, comments etc from WTO- SPS Committee members within a period of 60 days on the draft notification related to Standards for list of Histamine Forming Fish Species and limits of Histamine level for Fish and Fishery Products. 1. In the Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, toxins and Residues) Regulations, 2011, in regulation 2.5, relating to “Other Contaminants”, after sub-regulation 2.5.1 the following sub-regulation shall be inserted, namely:- “2.5.2 Histamine in Fish and Fishery Products contaminants, Toxins and Residues 1. Fish species having potential to cause histamine poisoning Sl.No. Family Scientific Name Common Name 1. Carangidae Alectis indica Indian Threadfish Alepes spp. Scad Atropus atropos Cleftbelly trevally Carangoides Yellow Jack bartholomaei Carangoides spp. Trevally Caranx crysos Blue runner Caranx spp. Jack/Trevally Decapterus koheru Koheru Decapterus russelli Indian scad Decapterus spp. Scad Elagatis bipinnulata Rainbow Runner Megalaspis cordyla Horse Mackerel/Torpedo Scad Nematistius pectoralis Roosterfish Oligoplites saurus Leather Jacket Pseudocaranx dentex White trevally Sl.No. Family Scientific Name Common Name Scomberoides Talang queenfish commersonnianus Scomberoides spp. Leather Jacket/Queen Fish Selene spp. Moonfish Seriola dumerili Greater/Japanese Amberjack or Rudder Fish Seriola lalandi Yellowtail Amberjack Seriola quinqueradiata Japanese Amberjack Seriola rivoliana Longfin Yellowtail Seriola spp. Amberjack or Yellowtail Trachurus capensis Cape Horse Mackerel Trachurus japonicas Japanese Jack Mackerel Trachurus murphyi Chilean Jack Mackerel Trachurus Yellowtail Horse Mackerel novaezelandiae Trachurus spp. Jack Mackerel/Horse Mackerel Trachurus trachurus Atlantic Horse Mackerel Uraspis secunda Cottonmouth jack 2. Chanidae Chanos chanos Milkfish 3. Clupeidae Alosa pseudoharengus Alewife Alosa spp. Herring Amblygaster sirm Spotted Sardinella Anodontostoma chacunda Chacunda gizzard shad Brevoortia patronus Gulf Menhaden Brevoortia spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Review on Reproduction of the Most Important Fish Species of the Genus Seriola
    BIBLIOGRAPHY REVIEW ON REPRODUCTION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FISH SPECIES OF THE GENUS SERIOLA Final Degree Work of Degree in Marine Sciences Author: Nuria Esther Marrero Sánchez Academic Tutor: José Manuel Vergara Martin Cotutor: Hipólito Fernández-Palacios Barber Course 2016/2017 BIBLIOGRAPHY REVIEW ON REPRODUCTION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FISH SPECIES OF THE GENUS SERIOLA. Nuria Esther Marrero Sánchez The title of the work is: BIBLIOGRAPHY REVIEW ON REPRODUCTION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FISH SPECIES OF THE GENUS SERIOLA The student author of the work is Nuria Esther Marrero Sánchez, student of Degree in Marine Sciences at the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. The academic tutor is José Manuel Vergara Martín, teacher at the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. The cotutor is Hipólito Fernández-Palacios Barber, researcher at ECOAQUA -ULPGC institution. ~ 2 ~ BIBLIOGRAPHY REVIEW ON REPRODUCTION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FISH SPECIES OF THE GENUS SERIOLA. Nuria Esther Marrero Sánchez Index Pages 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 4 2. Characteristics of the Genus Seriola................................................................... 5 2.1. Description of Seriola dumerili.................................................................... 6 2.2. Description of Seriola lalandi...................................................................... 7 2.3. Description of Seriola quinqueradiata......................................................... 8 2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Suborder ACANTHUROIDEI EPHIPPIDAE Chaetodipterus Faber
    click for previous page Perciformes: Acanthuroidei: Ephippidae 1799 Suborder ACANTHUROIDEI EPHIPPIDAE Spadefishes by W.E. Burgess, Red Bank, New Jersey, USA A single species occurring in the area. Chaetodipterus faber (Broussonet, 1782) HRF Frequent synonyms / misidentifications: None / None. FAO names: En - Atlantic spadefish; Fr - Disque portuguais; Sp - Paguara. Diagnostic characters: Body deep, included 1.2 to 1.5 times in standard length, orbicular, strongly compressed. Mouth small, terminal, jaws provided with bands of brush-like teeth, outer row larger and slightly compressed but pointed at tip. Vomer and palatines toothless. Preopercular margin finely serrate; opercle ends in blunt point. Dorsal fin with 9 spines and 21 to 23 soft rays. Spinous portion of dorsal fin low in adults, distinct from soft-rayed portion; anterior portion of soft dorsal and anal fins prolonged.Juve- niles with third dorsal fin spine prolonged, becoming proportionately smaller with age. Anal fin with 3 spines and 18 or 19 rays. Pectoral fins short, about 1.6 in head, with 17 or 18 soft rays. Caudal fin emarginate. Pelvic fins long, extending to origin of anal fin in adults, beyond that in young. Lateral-line scales 45 to 50. Head and fins scaled. Colour: silvery grey with blackish bars (bars may fade in large individuals) as follows: Eye bar extends from nape through eye to chest; first body bar starts at predorsal area, crosses body behind pectoral fin insertion, and ends on abdomen; second body bar incomplete, extending from anterior dorsal-fin spines vertically toward abdomen but ending just below level of pectoral-fin base;third body bar extends from anterior rays of dorsal fin across body to anterior rays of anal fin;last body bar runs from the middle soft dorsal fin rays to middle soft anal-fin rays; last bar crosses caudal peduncle at caudal-fin base.
    [Show full text]
  • MRAG South Atlantic PSA Draft Report
    South Atlantic Species Productivity – Susceptibility Analyses Draft Report To the Lenfest Ocean Program MRAG Americas 65 Eastern Avenue, Unit B2C Essex, MA 01929 Ph. 978-768-3880 Fax. 978-768-3878 www.mragamericas.com August 27, 2008 Table of Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Risk Based Assessment ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Information Collection ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 A Note about our Productivity Susceptibility Analysis Methodology................................................ 3 2 Non Snapper/Grouper Species ............................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Pink Shrimp, Penaeus [Farfantepenaeus] duorarum ....................................................................... 3 2.2 Red Drum, Sciaenops ocellatus ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Snapper/Grouper Complex .................................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Groupers .......................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Snapper.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Training Manual Series No.15/2018
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CMFRI Digital Repository DBTR-H D Indian Council of Agricultural Research Ministry of Science and Technology Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Department of Biotechnology CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual This is a limited edition of the CMFRI Training Manual provided to participants of the “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals” organized by the Marine Biotechnology Division of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), from 2nd February 2015 - 31st March 2018. Principal Investigator Dr. P. Vijayagopal Compiled & Edited by Dr. P. Vijayagopal Dr. Reynold Peter Assisted by Aditya Prabhakar Swetha Dhamodharan P V ISBN 978-93-82263-24-1 CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Published by Dr A Gopalakrishnan Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute PB.No:1603, Ernakulam North P.O, Kochi-682018, India. 2 Foreword Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Kochi along with CIFE, Mumbai and CIFA, Bhubaneswar within the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Department of Biotechnology of Government of India organized a series of training programs entitled “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals”.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia: Reconstructing Estimates of Total Fisheries Removal, 1950-2010
    Fisheries Centre The University of British Columbia Working Paper Series Working Paper #2015 - 02 Australia: Reconstructing estimates of total fisheries removal, 1950-2010 Kristin Kleisner, Ciara Brennan, Anna Garland, Stephanie Lingard, Sean Tracey, Phil Sahlqvist, Angelo Tsolos, Daniel Pauly, and Dirk Zeller Year: 2015 Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] This working paper is made available by the Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. Australia - Kleisner et al. 1 AUSTRALIA: RECONSTRUCTING ESTIMATES OF TOTAL FISHERIES REMOVALS 1950-2010 Kristin Kleisnera, Ciara Brennana, Anna Garlandb, Stephanie Lingarda, Sean Traceyc, Phil Sahlqvistd, Angelo Tsolose, Daniel Paulya, and Dirk Zellera a Sea Around Us, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada b Fisheries Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, GPO Box 46, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia c Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private bag 49, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia d Fisheries and Risk Analysis Branch, ABARES, GPO Box 1563, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia e SARDI SA Aquatic Sciences Centre, Fisheries – Information Services, PO Box 120, Henley Beach, SA 5022 Australia [email protected]; kristen.kleisner @noaa.gov; c [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ; [email protected] ABSTRACT Australia’s commercial fisheries are of significant value to the Australian economy, with the twenty Commonwealth fisheries alone worth around AUD$320 million in production value.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Vulnerability in the Global Fish Catch
    The following appendix accompanies the article Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch William W. L. Cheung1,*, Reg Watson1, Telmo Morato1,2, Tony J. Pitcher1, Daniel Pauly1 1Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal *Email: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 333:1–12 (2007) Appendix 1. Intrinsic vulnerability index of fish taxa represented in the global catch, based on the Sea Around Us database (www.seaaroundus.org) Taxonomic Intrinsic level Taxon Common name vulnerability Family Pristidae Sawfishes 88 Squatinidae Angel sharks 80 Anarhichadidae Wolffishes 78 Carcharhinidae Requiem sharks 77 Sphyrnidae Hammerhead, bonnethead, scoophead shark 77 Macrouridae Grenadiers or rattails 75 Rajidae Skates 72 Alepocephalidae Slickheads 71 Lophiidae Goosefishes 70 Torpedinidae Electric rays 68 Belonidae Needlefishes 67 Emmelichthyidae Rovers 66 Nototheniidae Cod icefishes 65 Ophidiidae Cusk-eels 65 Trachichthyidae Slimeheads 64 Channichthyidae Crocodile icefishes 63 Myliobatidae Eagle and manta rays 63 Squalidae Dogfish sharks 62 Congridae Conger and garden eels 60 Serranidae Sea basses: groupers and fairy basslets 60 Exocoetidae Flyingfishes 59 Malacanthidae Tilefishes 58 Scorpaenidae Scorpionfishes or rockfishes 58 Polynemidae Threadfins 56 Triakidae Houndsharks 56 Istiophoridae Billfishes 55 Petromyzontidae
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Fish Species (Pisces) of La Réunion, Including a Red List of Threatened and Declining Species
    Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde A, Neue Serie 2: 1–168; Stuttgart, 30.IV.2009. 1 Annotated checklist of the fish species (Pisces) of La Réunion, including a Red List of threatened and declining species RONALD FR ICKE , THIE rr Y MULOCHAU , PA tr ICK DU R VILLE , PASCALE CHABANE T , Emm ANUEL TESSIE R & YVES LE T OU R NEU R Abstract An annotated checklist of the fish species of La Réunion (southwestern Indian Ocean) comprises a total of 984 species in 164 families (including 16 species which are not native). 65 species (plus 16 introduced) occur in fresh- water, with the Gobiidae as the largest freshwater fish family. 165 species (plus 16 introduced) live in transitional waters. In marine habitats, 965 species (plus two introduced) are found, with the Labridae, Serranidae and Gobiidae being the largest families; 56.7 % of these species live in shallow coral reefs, 33.7 % inside the fringing reef, 28.0 % in shallow rocky reefs, 16.8 % on sand bottoms, 14.0 % in deep reefs, 11.9 % on the reef flat, and 11.1 % in estuaries. 63 species are first records for Réunion. Zoogeographically, 65 % of the fish fauna have a widespread Indo-Pacific distribution, while only 2.6 % are Mascarene endemics, and 0.7 % Réunion endemics. The classification of the following species is changed in the present paper: Anguilla labiata (Peters, 1852) [pre- viously A. bengalensis labiata]; Microphis millepunctatus (Kaup, 1856) [previously M. brachyurus millepunctatus]; Epinephelus oceanicus (Lacepède, 1802) [previously E. fasciatus (non Forsskål in Niebuhr, 1775)]; Ostorhinchus fasciatus (White, 1790) [previously Apogon fasciatus]; Mulloidichthys auriflamma (Forsskål in Niebuhr, 1775) [previously Mulloidichthys vanicolensis (non Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1831)]; Stegastes luteobrun- neus (Smith, 1960) [previously S.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 40Th U.S.-Japan Aquaculture Panel Symposium
    Hatchery Technology for High Quality Juvenile Production Proceedings of the 40th U.S.-Japan Aquaculture Panel Symposium University of Hawaii East West Center Honolulu, Hawaii October 22-23 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-136 Hatchery Technology for High Quality Juvenile Production Proceedings of the 40th U.S.-Japan Aquaculture Panel Symposium University of Hawaii East West Center Honolulu, Hawaii October 22-23 2012 Mike Rust1, Paul Olin2, April Bagwill3, and Marie Fujitani3, editors 1Northwest Fisheries Science Center 2725 Montlake Boulevard East Seattle, Washington 98112 2California Sea Grant UCSD / Scripps Institution of Oceanography 133 Aviation Blvd., Suite 109 Santa Rosa CA 95403 3NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-136 December 2013 U.S. Department of Commerce Penny Pritzker, Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Dr. Kathryn Sullivan, (Acting) NOAA Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service Samuel D. Rauch III, (Acting) Assistant Administrator for Fisheries SUGGESTED CITATION: Rust, M., P. Olin, A. Bagwill and M. Fujitani (editors). 2013. Hatchery Technology for High Quality Juvenile Production: Proceedings of the 40th U.S.-Japan Aquaculture Panel Symposium, Honolulu, Hawaii, October 22-23, 2012. U.S. Dept. Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-136. A COPY OF THIS REPORT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM: Northwest Fisheries Science Center 2725 Montlake Boulevard East Seattle, Washington 98112 OR ONLINE AT: http://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/tm/ Reference throughout this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA.
    [Show full text]