DOCOMENT MOSE
ED 105 800 BE 006 492
TITLE Ohio Instructional Grants. Fourth Annual Report. 1973-74 Academic Year. INSTITUTION Ohio Board of Regents, Columbus. PUB DATE Dec 74 NOTE 58p.
EDRS PRICE BF-$0.76 BC-$3.32 PIUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Costs; Economic Disadvantagement; *Educational Finance; *Financial Policy; *Grants; *Higher Education; *State Aid; Statewide Planning; Statistical Data; Student Characteristics; Student Needs; Undergraduate Study IDENTIFIERS *Ohio Instructional Grants
ABSTRACT The Ohio Instructional Grant ProgLan is a financial aid program designed to assist low and middle income students who are enrolled for full-tine undergraduate study in eligible Ohio institutions of higher education. These grants are not intended to cover all college costs nor are they intended to meet the total unmet need of participating students. Ohio Instructional Grants serve as one source of student assistance and should be coabined with available funds fro other financial aid programs. The major objective of the Ohio Instructionii grant Program is to assist in the elimination of the economic barrier that discourages many promising students in their plans to seek higher education. These grants are not awarded upon the basis of scholarship, as such, but upon the basis of relative financial need. Sections of this report cover the Ohio Instructional Grant Act; the purpose of the program; student profile, and student profile charts; financial profile, and financial charts and tables. Statistical tables accompany the text. (Author/PG) 4
U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EDUCATION S. NATIONAL WELFARE INSTITUTE OF HtS DOCUMENTEDUCATION DUCED EXAC'LYHA` BEEN THE PCPSON AS RECEIVEDREPRO AT(NG IT PDINTSOR ORG,,NI2ATiON FROM OF VIEW OR ORIGIN STATED DONOT NF OPINIONS SENT OFFICIAL NA 7 IONALCESSARILYSEPRE EDUCAT ON POST' ION ORINSTITUTE OF POLICY =1M11.11111111.11
OHIO BOARD OF REOLNTS State Office Tower 30 East Broad Street, 36th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone - 1-614-466-7420
Board Members
John Marshall Briley, Chairman Robert F. Doolittle, Vice Chairman David G. Hill, Vice Chairman Marvin L. Warner, Vice Chairman Paul E. Belcher, Secretary Thomas L. Cvnlan James J. Flannery Donald L. Huber Mary Ellen Ludlum
Chancellor
Dr. James A. (Dolph) Norton
Vice Chancellor for Community Liaison
Dr. Harold W. Oyster
Director, Student Assistance Office
Charles W. Seward, III
Assistant Director, Student Assistance Office
Thomas Lee Rudd
Support Staff, Student Assistance Office
Office Supervisor - Barbara Culp Secretary - Nina Anthony
Independent Application Examiner - Cheryl Kratzer
Dependent Application Examiners - Edith Cobb Billie Wilder Margaret Bottomley Marlena Gatewood Receptionist and Application Examiner - Margaret Dittoe
Mail Clerk - Linda Smith 41111111
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Ohio instructional Grant Act
Table of Grants
Purpose of Program iv
Introduction
SECTION I
Student Profile 1-2
Student Profile Charts 3-19
SECTION II
Financial Profile 20-23
Financial Charts and Tables 24-49
4 OHIO INSTRUCTIONAL GRANT ACT
In accordance with the provisions of Section 3333.1? 3f the Ohio Revised Code enacted into law by the 108th Ohio General Assembly in 1969 and subsequent revisions made by the 109th and 110th Ohio General Assem- blies in 1971 and 1973, the Ohio Board of Regents shall administer the Ohio Instructional Grant Program for undergraduate students enrolled dur- ingthe academic year 1973-74. The revision enacted by the 110th Ohio General Assembly reads as follows:
The Ohio Board of Regents shall establish and administer an instructional grant program for full-time undergraduata students in an Ohio institution of higher education which is state-assisted or which has received a certificate of authorization from the Board pursuant to Chapter 1713. of the Revised Code.The Board may adopt rules and regulations to carry out this se:tion.The General Assembly shall support the instructional grant program by such sums and in such manner as it may provide, but the Board may also receive funds from other sources to support the program. If the amounts available for support of the program are inadequate tc provide grants to all eligible students, preference in the pay- ment of grants shall be in the following order: ;1) freshmen; (2) sophomnres; (3) ,Ivniors; and (4) seniors.
In order to be eligible for an instructional grant, a student shall be a resident of Ohio and shall be enrolled as a full-time student in an Ohio institution of higher education which meets the requirements cdf Title VI of the "Civil Rights Act of 1964." "Resident" and 'Pal-time student" shall be defined by rules adopted by the An instructional grant shall be paid to an eligible studenthrough the college or university in which he is enrolled. Applications for such grants shall be made as prescribed by the Board of Regents and such applications may be made in conj,:nction with and upon the basis of information pro- vided in co:,yunction with student assistance programs funded by agencies of tue United States government or from financial re- source::: of the institution of higher education. The college or university shall certify that the student applicant is enrolled as a full-time student. Instructional grants shall be provided to an eligible student only as long as he or she is enrolled and is making appropriate progress toward an associate or Lachelor's degree. The grant shall cover two semesters or three quarters or the equivalent of one academic year. Instruct7,-Al grants shall be made to a student if the student is enrolled in an Ohio institution of higher education where the in- structional and general fees are one thousand dollars or more for a two semester or three quarter academic year or if the student is enrolled in a technical education program of at least two years duration sponsored by a private institution of higher education. The grant shall not exceed the total instructional and general charges of the institution. The amount of the instructional grant shall be determined in azcardance with the following table:
NUMBER OF DEPTLNDENT CHILDREN
Adjusted Effective Income 1 2 3 4 5 or More
$ 4,000 - Under $1320 $1320 $1326 41320 $1320
$ 4,001 - $ 4,999 1200 1320 1320 1320 1320
$ 5,000 - $ 5.999 1050 1200 1320 1320 1320
$ 6,000 - $ 6,099 900 1050 1200 1320 1320
$ 7,000 - $ 7,999 750 900 1050 1200 1320
$ 8,000 - 4 6,999 600 750 900 1050 1200
$ 9,000 - $ 9,999 45o 600 750 900 1050
$10,000 - $10,999 300 45o 600 750 900
$11,000 - $13,999 150 300 450 600 750
$14,000 - Over - - - - -
ii Instructional grants shall be made to a student if the student is enrolled in an Ohio institution of higher education where the in- structional and general fees are less than one thousand dollars for a two semester or three quarter academic year. The grant shall not exceed thk total instructional and general charges of the institution. The amount of the instructional grant shall be determined in accordance with the following table:
NUMBER OF DEPENDENT CHILDREN
Adjusted Effective Income 1 2 3 4 oll_.:More
$ 4,000 - Under $570 $570 $570 $570 $570
$ 4,001- $ 4,999 510 570 570 570 570
$ 5,000 - $ 5,999 450 510 570 570 570
$ 6,000 - $ 6,999 390 450 510 570 570
$ 7,000 - $ 7,999 330 390 450 510 570
$ 8,000 - $ 8,999 270 330 390 450 510
$ 9,000 - $ 9,999 210 270 330 390 450
$10,000 - $10,999 150 210 270 330 390
$11,000 - $13,999 90 150 210 273 330
$14,000 - Over - - - - -
"Adjusted Effective Income" as used in this section shall be defined by rule adopted by the Ohio Board of Regents, and may take into account the income of the student and of the student's parents and spouse. Family income may be verified by supplying to the Board of Regent3 a copy of the federal government tax return, by authorizing access to the family federal government income tax return, or by other means satis- factory to the Board.
No grant shall be made to any student in a course of study leading to a degree in theology, religion, or other field of preparation for a reli- gious profession.
iii Purpose of the Program
The Ohio Instructional Grant Program is a financial aid program
designed to assist low and middle income students who are enrolled for
full-time undergraduate study in eligible Ohio institutions of higher
education. These grants are not intended to cover all college costs nor are they intended to meet the total unmet need of participating students.
Ohio Instructional Grants serve is one source of student assistance and
should be combined with available funds from other financial aid programs
including Basic Grants, Educational Opportunity Grants, Work-Study, student
loans and scholarships.
The major objective of the Ohio Instructional Grant Program is to
assist in the elimination of the economic barrier which discourages many
promising students in their plans to seek higher education. It is not
the intent of the program to replace appropriate financial resources which
are available to students to pay the cost of higher education, but rather
to supplement these resources which include parental income as well as the
student's own financial resources.
Ohio Instructional Grants are not awarded upon the basis of scholar-
ship, as such, but upon the basis of relative financial need. Grants are awarded to the average as well as the superior student.
iv
a INTRODUCTION
Ohio Instructional Grants were made available to students enrolled during the 1973-74 academic year as freshmen, sophomores, juniors and seniors. Nineteen point eight million dollars was appropriated by the 110th Ohio General Assembly to fund the program. Fifty-two private colleges and universities, twelve state universities and their twenty branches, and twenty-three public two-year colleges participated in the program during the 1973-74 academic year.
Eligibility Requirements
order to be eligible for consideration of a grant a student must meet .c ,ollowing requirements.
(1) Be a resident of Ohio.
(2) Be enrolled as a full-time undergraduate student in an eligible Ohio institution of higher education.
(3) Be making appropriate progress toward an associate degree or a bachelor's degree.
(4) Not be enrolled in a course of study leading to a degree in theology, religion, or other field of preparation for a religious profession.
Application Procedure
An Ohio student who is enrolled or plans to be enrolled in an eligible Ohio institution of higher education on a full-time basis must apply for an instructional grant through the Student Assistance Office of the Ohio Board of Regents.
The student obtains an application packet from either the high school counselor, the financial aid office of the college or the Board of Regents.
The student and the studtnt's parents complete the application, and the income statement which is a part of the application, and submits these to the Student Assistance Office of the Ohio Board of Regents.
The Student Assistance Office then determines the amount to which the student is entitled based upon the family's adjusted effective income and the number of dependent children in the family.
The student then receives an award certificate which is submitted to the financial aid office of the college.
Method of Payment
The student receives the Ohio Instructional Grant through the financial _ aid office as provided by the Student Assistance Office of the Board of Regents. The grant is applied to the instructional and general charges of the college or university.
v 9 SECTION I
Student Profile
The following data reflect some academic as well as social and economic characteristics of the Ohio Instructional Grant recipients for the 1973-74 academic year. This profile is a result of a cooperative effort between the Student Assistance Office of the Ohio Board of Regents and the American College Testing Program.This office extends its appre- ciation to Tom Colaner of ACT for his special efforts in the development and implementation of this aspect of the Annual Report.
. The following charts are based on freshmen class Ohio Instructional Grant recipients who took the A.C.T. and completed the student profile questionnaire during their senior year in high school prior to entering college in the 1973-74 academic year. The statistics in this report show that there is very little comparative difference between the A.C.T. scores of OIG recipients and the national norm. The composite of English, math, social studies and natural science scores for the grant recipients was 19.8% as compared with the national norm of 20.1%. However, grant recipients showed a 2.89 high school grade average as compared to a national average of 2.68.
In terms of proposed educational majors there was little difference between grant recipients and the national norm with the exception of the health field where 21% of the OIG freshmen indicated a preference as compared to only 9% of the national group.
With one exception, there were no significant differences in the level of educational degrees sought by the two groups: 17% of the grant recipients planned to seek doctorates as compared to 12% of the national norm.
In the area of special educational needs the grant recipients ex- pressed less need for help in choosing a college major and improving reading, math, writing and study skills.
The grant recipients showed a greater interest in out-of-class achieve- ments in areas such as science, music, writing, leadership and athletics. Some 53% of the OIG students participated in high school honors courses as compared to 35% of the national norm.
The elgle most significant difference between the grant recipients and the naticaal group involved the need for financial assistance. Some 90% of the grant recipients expected to apply for financial aid throughout their college careers as compared to only 48% of the national norm. Some 47% indicated that they would need help in finding employment as compared to 27% of the national norm. This statistic indicates that it is not a question of whether needy students want to work to help themselves in school but rather a problem of finding employment.
1
10 The students were asked to indicate the single most important factor in making a college choice. These factors involved the intel- lectual reputation, social climate, location and size of a school, finan- cial considerations, advice from parents and information from teachers and counselors.
Generally, differences here between the two groups were not sig- nificant, except in the area of financial considerations. Some 20% of the grant recipients listed this as the single most important factor in selecting a college as compared to 11% of the national norm.
2
ii ACTSTANDARDMARTI OCIIPOSITE BOOMS PERCENT OF STUDENTS WITH ACT ENGLISH SCORES IN SELECTED INTERVALS Private Institutions OIG Recipients Freshmen 1-15 16-20 21-25 26-36 K.4-Teat Public Institutions OIG Recipients 19.5 10% Freshmen 28.4 26% 7% - 2-Year Public Institution', OIG Recipients Freshmen15.7 32% 35% AllOIG Students Frednen Total NATIONAL EONS TOTAL . 4 26% 33% 33% I HI E. Int PIE PIE 18.7 21% In 33% 11 6% CHART I PERCENT OF sTumsurs WM ACT MATHEMATICS SCORES ACTPrivateSTANDARD COMPOSITE Institutions SCORES 1-15 16-20 IN SELECTED INTERVALS 21 -25 26-36 M. OIG Recipients Fredhmen 21.9 li -Year Public Institutions OIG Recipients Predhmen 24 '4 120E1 38% x. 20.3 NEM27% 22% 19% 32% p-Year Public Institutions OIG Recipients 14. Freshmen 16.4 OIGAll StudentsFreshmen Total 47% 26% 13% x. NATIONAL NORMS 20.3 27% 23% 18% 31% M. 20.2TOTAL III IIIED 21 11E PEI] CHART I PERCENT OF STUDENTS WITS ACT SOCIAL STUDIES SCORES ACTPrivateSTUMM COKPOSITE SCORESInstitutions OIG Recipients 1-15 16-20 IN SELECTED INTERVALS 21-25 26-36 M. Freshmen 20.7 25% 4-Year Public Institutions OIG Recipients Freshwen 19.1 AIIIMINN111111%. W4r.. -2 -Year Public Institutions OIG Recipients 33% 24% I 1 1 M. freshmen 15.6 51% Al].OIG StudentsFreshmen Total M. NATIONAL NORM TOTAL19.1 33% I I 14% 1111 1111111111 M. 19.9 ILI PIE 11110 20% 1 II 5 magrr OF STUDENTS WITH ACT NATURAL SCIENCES IN SELECTED INTERVALS SCORES ACTPrivateSTANDARD CCICPOSITE Institutions SCORES OIG Recipients 1-15 16-20 21-25 26-36 14. Freshmen 22.4 4-Year Public Institutions OIG Recipients Freshmen 1111111 214. -Year Public Institutions 21.0 24% 1111 lia OIG Recipients Freshmen 3111Li M. 18.0 111111 PEED 1 All Students Total 17% 14. OIG Freshmen 21.0 111U NATIONAL NOSE TOTAL 1111101 111111E 1111. K. 21.0 PIE IRE Ord 111 6 ACTCHART COMPOSITE I PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN SELECMD INTERVALS WITH ACT COMPOSITE SCORES Private/RAMMED Institutions BOOMS OIG Recipients 1-15 36-20 21-25 - 26-36 14. Freshmen 21.2 24% 4.4eer Public Institutions OIG Recipients Freshmen 33% 26% 2-Year Public Institutions OIG Recipients 19.8 2/1E1 11111 31% 20% C74 I I 1 14. Freshmen 16.6 OIGAll StudentsFreemen Total 45% 27%11111 22% 7% x. RATIONAL NORM 19.8 30% 20% K. 20.1TOTAL PIE-111 21E1 PIM 32 EI 33% 15% US OE PARTME EDUCATIONNT Or WEALTH. NATIONAL WELFARE INSTITUTEOf THIS DOCUMENT OUCED EXACTLYHAS BEEN THE PERSON AS RECEIVEDREPRO A TING IT ORORGANIZATION PROA POINTS OF ORIGIN STATEDSTATE DO VIEW OR OPINIONS SENT NOT NECESSARILY OFFICOAL NAT R EPRE EOUCA T ONPOSITION OR INSTITUTE OF POLICY ACTSTANDARDCHART COMPOSITE I SCORES D S F PERCENT OF STUDENTS WITH AVERAGE OF FOUR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES (HSA) CIN SELECTED INTERVALS A Private Institutions OIG Recipients Freshmen 1.4 & Below 1.5 - 2.4 2.5 - 3.4 3.5 - 4.o N.4-iear Public Institutions OIG Recipients 3.09 o% 15% 49% 36% 11 M. Freshmen 2.95 20% 29% 2-Year Public Institutions OIG Recipients Freshmen 50% M. 2.67 2% 34% 148% OIGAll FreshmenStudents Total 16% M. NATIONAL NORMS 2.96 TOTAL 1% 20% IN 50% 27% U. 2,68 2 17% 8 PROPOSED EIRICATIONAL MAJOR EDUCATIONCHART VII National Freshmen la 0 10 20 30 I10 50 60 SOCIAL, RELIGIOUS OIGNational Freshmen imaj_10% ANDBUSINESS, PERSUASIVE POLITICAL OIGNational Freabmen 18%19% 7% Ia AGRICULTUREFORESTRYSCIENTIFIC AND NationalOIGNational Freshmen 2%3%7% HEALTH NationalOIG Freshmen 21% 9% 1 HtARTS mmer= AND OIGNational FreshmenIteshmen 12%11% 5% 111 ANDTRADE, ENGINEERINGTECHNICAL INDUSTRIAL NationalOIGNational Freshmen 3%8% UNDECIDED NationalOIG Fresmos LI% 6% 9 MART VIII NDOCATIONAL PLANS ....- MOO= MUNN WONTBMIATIOHNICAL(Loss Than 2 Yearn) OIG freshmen 2% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 COLLIERWO-UM MGM NationalOIG Freshmen 32%3.2.% OREsaurimaseBACHELOR'S OR TEE OR UAW OIGNational Freihmenfreshmen 20%We%la% MIS ADVANCEDDOCTORATEGRAWATI DEGREEMOWOR OTHER *AtonalOIGMiational Freshmen 18%12%23% OTHER(Ineluaing N.S. =gloms) FatimaOIG freshman 5%4% 10 Tr I lair1,1,E us1499411 010 TinoT4181 WM fIu. TWI: SEE%9E usuclvezd 010 TocloT411 8SIALIVISH BMA %9%6 uoviI1041 DIO rivaonv armaanav 80 IKE IV Kari 801DIVONTLO BD MOH 06 09 OD HO magas SIMS Oil £111/DMIXIE 821111018 110 ZAIDEZaoL og og oft of oa OT 0 %T9%SS noloPezil 010 Tva0T41141 n11118808ZERTIOD0111811CH CRAM X MOM OF STOMMTB w MITIONMIND SPECIAL ILOCATIONAL IUDS MAJORCHOOSING A OIGNational Freshmen 37%30% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 REARM=ROVING MILLS NationalOIG Freebmen 25%34% NIL IND MATHIMPROVIZO SKILLS OIGNational Freshmen 49%40% EITODTDIFROVIM3 SKILLS OIGNational Freshmen 146%32% WRITINGDIPRENIN3 mama OIGNational Freshmen 45%37% CRUM XL PERCENT OF STUDENTS WHO WANT TO BE CONSIDERED FOR t INDEPENIIINT OIG Freshmen 49% 0 3D 20 ADVANCED COLLEGE STUD! 30 40 Y) 60 HONORSSTUD! OIGNational Freshmen 42% 48% 1 EIGLISEADVANCEPROGRAM NationalOIG Freshmen 23% 19%32% 1 Iv1V,-) MATEADVANCE OIG Freedmen 19% 14% ADVANCEFOREDN LANUUAall NationalOIGNational Freshmen 11% 8%
33 CHART m MC= OF MIMEO VW w&2 TO BE ItILLArDIR MODEM FULL-TIMBMN:NTS RationalOIG Freshmen 95% 93% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 NEU= OF BT01111115 TED RAM RIB OM OF 0 10 c 20 HIGH SCIVOL On OR 183RR TARR zio 50 60 70 80 90 11DREO1HTGROM YBAROF SCHOOL OR RationalOIG Freshmen 8%4% I 111 14 OIG Freshmen 10% PERCENT OF0 STUDENTS WITH THREE OR MORE W2-OF -CLASS ACHIEVEMENTS 10 20 30 Ito 50 60 70 LEADERSHIPscierrac NationalNationalOIG Freshmen 36%38% 7% MUSICART OIGNationalOIG Freshmen Freshmen 35% 8%9% WRITING OIGNational Freshmen 10%15%28% ATHLETICSSPEECH OIGNational freshmenFreshen 41% 11% SKILLSPRACTICAL NationalOIGNational Freshmen 65 6714% WORKEXPERIENCE NationalOIG Freshmen 49% 57% CHART XIV PERCENT OF STOMENTS WHO PARTICIPATED IN
HIGH SCHOOL "HONORS" COURSES
OIG Recipients National
100% 100%
53%
35%
25 CHART XV PERCENT OF STUDENTS WHO EXPECT TO APPLY TOR FINANCIAL AID TO =RICHE =LEGE ZEPENSIS YES,COLLEGE ALL THROUGH OIGNational Freshmen 90% 48% 10 20 30 ito 50 60 70 80 YES,SECOND BUT YEARNOT TIE NationalOIG Freshmen 12% lilt 1 PROBARLY NEVER NationalOM Freshmen 41% 6%
17 CHART XVI PERCENT OF STUDENTS INDICATING THESE ITEMS AS MAJOR INFLUENCES IN SELECTION OF COLLEGE INTELLECTUAL REPULATION GoodIntellect. Faculty Atmosphere 0000000 MO ex SOCIAL CLIMATE SpecialHigh Scholastic Curriculum Standing lo 20 30 40 50 6o los 70 8o GoodSocialCoeducational Athletic Opportunity Program 0000000000000000000 IMO 41. OM ti FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS FinancialLow Cost Aid Offer .00 LOCATION AND SIZE SizeLocation OTHER INFLUENCES AdviceIrfo.Info. ofGiven Parents by H.S. CounselorTeacher CampusCollege Visit Admissions or Tour Counselor 10 20 30 40er. 4o ---...._ 5o 6o 70 NATIONALOIG FRESHMEN 18 so CHARTINTETLFCTUAL XVII REPUTATION OIG Freshmen SINGLE MOST IMPORTANTNational FACTOR IN MAKING COLLEGE CHOICE SpecialHighGoodIntell. FacultyScholastic AtmosphereCurriculum Standards 31% 8%2%3% 23% 7%4%3% OIG FRESHMEN 44% NATIONAL 37% SOCIAL CLIMATECoeducationalGoodSocial Athletic Opportunities Program OIG Freshmen 0%3% National 1%2%4% OIG FRESHMEN 6% NATIONAL 7% FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONSFinancialLow Cost Aid Offer OIG Freshmen 10% 6% National 6%5% OIG FRESHMEN 16% NATIONAL 11% LOCATION LocationANDSize SIZE OIG Freshmen 11% 2% National 16% 3% OIG FRESHMEN 13% NATIONAL 19% OTHER INFLUENCESAdvice of Parents OIG Freshmen 8% National . CampusCollegeInfo. Given VisitAdmissions by or H.S. Tour Cslr. Cslr.Teacher OIG FRESHMEN 21% NATIONAL 26% 19 SECTION II
FINANCIAL PROFILE
Appropriations
Nineteen point eight million dollars was appropriated by the 110th Ohio General Assembly to fund the program for the 1973-74 academic year. Fifty-two private colleges, twelve state universities and their branches, six two-year public community colleges and seventeen two -year public technical colleges participated in the program during this year.
Geographic Distribution of Grant Recipients
The figures in Table I indicate that 50.6% of all grant recipients reside in six counties -- Cuyahoga, Franklin, Hamilton, Mahoning, Mont- gomery, and Summit. Sixty-two percent of all recipients reside in these six counties plus Lorain, Lucas, Stark and Trumbull. This corresponds with the fact that the 1970 census report indicates that 59% of the Ohio population resides in these ten counties.
Minority students represent 25.5% of the total number of grant re- cipients. This is approximately a .5% increase over the 1972-73 total. A total of 10,400 minority students received grants which is an increase of 1,271 minority recipients over the 1972-73 total. Of the 10,400 minority students, 82.0% reside in seven counties -- Cuyahoga, Franklin, Hamilton, Lucas, Montgomery, Summit and Mahoning.
With Franklin County as the north-south division point, approximately 37% of all grant recipients reside in the 38 southern counties and 63% in the 50 northerncounties.
Distribution of Grants by Type of Institution.
The average grant awarded to students attending private colleges was $722 representing a 5.6% decrease under the average grant awarded during the 1972-73 academic year. Of all grant recipients 27% or 11,008 attended private colleges.This is a 15.7% increase over the 1972-73 total.
The average grant awarded to students attending public institutions was $301 representing a 1.9% decrease under the average grant awardedduring the 1972-73 academic year.Of all grant recipients 73% or 29,662 attended public institutions. This is an increase of 2,612 students over the 1972-73 totals, and represents 9.6%.
Of the $19.8 million appropriation for the 1973-74 academic year, $7,953,940 was utilized by 11,008 students attending private colleges, while $8,934,306 was utilized by 29,662 students attending public institu- tions. Thus, 40,670 students utilized $16,888,246 during the 1973-74 academic year.
20 Distribution of Grant Recipients by Institution
Of those grant recipients attending private colleges, 17% are Black, 61%.live in urban communities, 95% are classified as dependent students and 80% come from double parent families.
Of those grant recipients attending four-year public institutions and their branches, 24% are Black, 67% live in urban communities, 92% are classi- fied as dependent students and 74% come from double parent families.
The two-year public institutions reflect some distinct differences in student characteristics as compared to four-year public and private insti.tu- tions. Black students represent 39% of those grant recipients attending two-year public institutions, and 72% live in urban communities, while80% are classified as dependent students and 60% come from double parent families.
Distribution of Grant Recipients by Family Income
Of those recipients attending private colleges, 24.1% come from families with gross incomes of less than 16,000 while of those attending four-year public institutions, 30.6% come from families with gross incomes of less than $6,000. However, the most significant comparison is at the two-year public institutions where 46.2% of the recipients come from families with gross incomes of less than $6,000. Regarding Black students, 57.9% come from families with gross incomes of less than $6,000. Of all grant recip- ients, 25.6% or 10,428 come from families with gross income over$11,000.
Of all grant recipients, 23% come from families with an adjusted effec- tive income between $0 and $5,999; 17.5% come from families with an adjusted effective income between $6,000 and $7,999; 33.9% from families between $8,000 and $10,999; and 25.6% from families between $11,000 and $13,999.
Distribution by Grants Awarded
Of the grant recipients for 1973-74, 12.3% of those attending private colleges received maximum grant awards of $1,320. At the four-year public institutions, 12.7% received maximum grant awards of $570, while at the two-year publics 8% received maximum grant awards of $570 and50.1% re- ceived the maximum amount based on the instructional and general fees of such institutions. Overall, 11.5% received a maximum grant award.
Black Student Profile
Of all Black student recipients 19.1% attended private colleges, 62.4% attended four-year public institutions and 18.5% attended two-year public institutions. Of the total, 93.5% live in urban communities, 47.6% come from single parent families, and 53.9% come from families with three or more dependent children. Of all Black student recipients 51.9% come from families with adjusted effectiveincomes between $0 and $5,999.
21
30 Average Student Profile
Of all grant recipients, 72.9% attended public institutions; 69.3% came from families with gross incomes over $6,000. The average recipient is 18 years old, white, comes from a double parent family and lives in an urban community. In terms of sex, 52% of the recipients are female and only in private colleges are there more male than female recipients (53% to 47%). In 67.4% of the families, one parent is working and in 21.6% of the families both parents are working.The average public school grant was $301 and the average private school grant was $722.
Distribution of Students by Class Level
Of the 40,670 recipients, 41% were freshmen, 28.3% were sophomores, 17.5% were juniors, and 13.1% were seniors. Over 15% of all full-time undergraduate students attending eligible participating institutions re- ceived assistance from the program.
State and Federal Programs
In addition to the Ohio Instructional Grant Program, the State of Ohio through the Ohio Student Loan Commission provides a Guaranteed Loan Program for Ohio students. Students may borrow Up to $2,500 per year from participating Ohio lending institutions.
The federal government provided four additional programs of financial assistance for Ohio students during the 1973-74 academic year -- the National Direct Student Loan Program (N.D.S.L.), the Supplemental Educational -Oppor- tunity Grants Program (E.O.G.), the College Work-Study Program, and the Basic Educational Opportunity Grants Program.
During the 1973-74 academic year, the federal government provided the following funding for Ohio institutions:
National Direct Student Loan $13,500,827 Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant 8,727,556 College Work-Study 12,091,304 Basic Educational Opportunity Grant 1,544,420 TOTAL $35,864,107
The State of Ohio provided the following:
Ohio Instructional Grants $16,888,246 Ohio Insured Student Loans 22,960,443 TOTAL $39,848,689
22
31 Thus, a total of $75,712,796 in assistance was given to Ohio's students. Of this total, 22.3% was provided by the Ohio Instructional Grant Program and 52.6% by the Ohio Instructional Grant Programand the Ohio Gth-ranteed Loan Program.
Y.
23
32 DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT RECIPIENTS BY COUNTY
rASHTABULA WILLIAMS FULTON LUCAS 1406 . . ;41 GEAUGA 103 (3.45)/ OTTAWA 119 ( .25) ( .29) LI WOOD .9( 194 A (.47) riUMBULL 1 HENRY SANDUSKY GRAIN L DEFIANCE ).:6 231 ERIE 62 241 196 143 ( .;'1) (.56) PORTAGE (2.037) (.59) hl) 4 ( . S., ; SUMMIT HURON I1043 _rii`DINA 340 PAUL DING1--- SENECA .83; L 141 2.96) 1446 .....4 58 1-PUTNAM HANCOCK 154 :69 (3.5)) MAHONING ( .10 1.62) (.36) ( .461 1671 205 244 (4.1') ( .50) ( .59) -----r- --1- ASHLANIr WAYNE VAN W ERfli WYANDOT CRAWFORD IRICHLAN 1 STARK hOLUMBIANA 132 1:2 1-----r,4LLEU 173 318 1 165 i 248 1 1430 (.29)r (.32) (.42) .y.i.c, (.t".0)i 530 502 (3.51) , i HARDIN .... . 'I.::' FCAi ROL L 1._. MERCEB1-1 '55 MAR-ION --.1- (.3c1 1 hITITAEi-----1-- 113 173 AUGLAIZE IMORROW I ---""-r-j 214 -1. SO (.27 ) ( .42 ) ;Si (.52) 41 - __1_. NOX 1 k 14 ) 3t 2305 338it 0 /---1---6-)---FLOGAN UNION J( .18) I SHELBY 189 ICOSHOCTON-{i ( '83) IAHARRISON 12(1 `-14 .J I 155 110 _I (.46) taii 166 ( .38) 71 1---DARKIP.- (.21)I: DELAWARE-I_ 141 1la4. ( .40) . (34) g ( .17 ) ---1-_.____I 129 LICKING 11 -- -1_ I:1 183 ....--...._ CHAMPAIGN .(.31) I-BELMONT 294 MUSKINGUIA GUERNSEY--- ( .44) MIAMI 113 FRANKLIN MADISON (.74 155 222 ( .27) 379 (.38) (.93) 6 _[ (54) 1---CLARK 65 2726 (.15) (6.10) 30;' r--1-j-r- --T"PERRY JNOBLE PREBLE ( .74) MONROE (1.31)11 FA IRFIELDL-I I 116 I PICKAWAY" 151 - 52 (.26) GREENE (2.6716) ( 37) MORGAN ' ( .12) (.14) °56. 64 LI (.05)5 i FAYETTE r- ( .1 ) (.21)" HOCKIN WASHINGTON 6 BUTLER WARREN CLINTON 69 --I L. 279 t ( .68 ) .2, 173 98 (.16) ATHENS (.29) Gt., (.24) __-_ 200 ) V IN roN 11( .46) /HIGHLAND t 54 IHAMILTON / _-._. --4( 413) (WI: LCLER MONT ri11-iKE --L. fl----MEIGS Top flgare represenls runax: ( .28) 91 of Chic Instr,x;i:nal -rant I ; 74b I JACKSON1 ( .3 ) I I( .22) reciplei (( 19) 186 -1-- Bott.:m figure represents n DAMS -___I( 45) I-GALLIA soir IL-\I percent of Grant recipients 9, . 49 440 L...,r-.... iL8 (1.06) I-(.36) I 1-1 Ll riAWRENdri N Pjf. I.. (.41)
24 at con NMAILE 33 DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT RECIPIENTS BY COUNTY AND ETHNICITY TABLECount I Black American Pct. Spanish-Surnamed No. American Pct. Oriental American No. Pct. American Indian No. Pct. Other Students No. Pct. County Totals No. Pct. AshlandAllenAdams 50 62 10.0 4.13.6 10 .2 0 10 .2 00 01 .2 0 156499 47 96.489.495.9 165502 49 1.32 .12.4o AuglaizeAthensAshtabulaBelmont 1342 47 11.6 2.23.43.7 10 .3 00 0 00 0 0 181366184318 97.896.388.196.6 185191379361 .45.93.46.88 ChampaignCarrollButlerBrown 8415 43 11.719.7 3.53.2 02 .5 0 00 0 100 .9 00 1131083140 90 88.395.679.896.8 128113426 93 1.04 .31.27.22 46W ColumbianaClintonClermontClark 147 30 65 27.5 6.12.85.7 0150 .79 0 0 0 10 .6 0 50017o382 92 94.393.996.671.5 530176534 98 1.301.31 .24.43 DarkeCuyahogaCrawfordCoshocton 3,649 936 39.4 1.66.43.5 125 03 1.61.4 0 35 10 .4.5 0 24 0 .3 00 5,419 176167132 96.596.258.693.6 9,252 183173141 22.74 .44.42.34 FairfieldErieDelawareDefiance 2214 25 10.911.2 3.5 140 2.8 .8 0 0 0 10 5 0 173114134 93.788.388.4 196129143 .67.48.31.35 FultonFranklinFayette 971 15 35.6 1.05.7 .7 11 130 2.91.1 .4 0 12 0 .14 0 06 .2 00 1,726 274 9981 99.396.163.393.1 2,726 103276 87 6.70 .25.21 GreeneGalliaGuernseyGeauga 8915 18 23.4 7.75.4 180 2.1 0 10 .7 00 012 1.0 .3 0 153282177139 - 93.998.774.291.2 155194148380 .38.93.47.36 HardinHamiltonHancock 1,385 57 40.2 2.93.2 .6 33 04 1.61.0 .6 0 15 1 .6.4.14 02 .1 0 2,007 149232 96.195.158.3 3,442 155244 8.46 .38.59 DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT RECIPIENTS BY COUNTY AND ETHNICITY CountyTABLE I (contd) Black AmericanNo. Pct. Spanish-Surnamed No. American Pct. Oriental American American IndianNo. Pct. No. Pct. Other Students No. Pct. County Totals No. Pct. HighlandHenryHarrison 913 1.14.27.8 140 4.5 .9 0 0 0 00 00 106 8368 95.891.494.3 116 8871 .17.28.21 HuronHolmesHocking 233 1.61.45.34.3 030 2.0 0 001 .7 00 01 .7 0 183140 6654 98.495.294.795.7 1861)77 69 .45.36.16 LakeKnoxJeffersonJackson 2173 3 14.5 1.63.3 20 00 0124 1.1 .2.8 0 02 .3 0 601184428 95.997.484.8 189167627505 1.541.24 .46.41 LoganLickingLawrence 1012 7 4.53.47.2 020 1.2 .3 0 02 .7 0 01 .3 0 281151 95.591.6 95.6 155294 .38.72 WCT: Lucas MadisonLorain 282128512 4 36.412.3 6.2 173853 0 1.02.75.1 0 3152 1.5 .2.4 10 024 .6.1.4 0 1,365 849856 60 81.492.360.482.1 1,6771,4061,043 65 2.564.123.46 .15 MedinaMarionMahoningMeigs 1016 5 16.8 5.57.55.3 0 00 102 .5.9 0 00 0 196178 86 94.594.291.6 189214 91 .42.22.46.52 MonroeMiamiMercer 933 227 45.4 1.23.43.2 902 .4.9 0 810 1.7 .4 0 30 .1 0 1,103 171213 56 94.995.998.853.6 2,056 173222 59 5.05 .14.54 MuskingumMorrowMorganMontgomery 36 05 11.9 7.8 0 00 0 11 1.31.6 .3 0 00 2655 58 98.8.790.698.1 302 766452 .12.74.18.15 NoblePauldingOttawa 410 6.91.0 0 013 1.73.1 00 01 1.91.7 0 00 0 151 353J 100.0 151 9758 .23.37.14 PikePickawayPerry 13 40 9.35.6 0 0 0 00 26 00 0 00 127 67 90.794.4 140 71 .17.34 TABLE I (contd) DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT RECIPIENTSSpanish-Surnamed BY COUNTY AND ETHNICITY PortageCounty Black AmericanNo. 61 17.9Pct. No. American 1 Pct. .3 Oriental American No. 2 Pct..6 American Indian No. 0 Pct. 0 Other Students No.276 Pc4.81.2 County Totals No.340 Pct. .83 RossRichlandPutnamPreble 122238 9 11.919.1 6.04.4 01 .3.5.9 0 0 0 102 .6.5 0 188277A134 94.087.18901J 200318205116 .49.78.51.28 ShelbySenecaSciotoSandusky 17102033 13.7 6.76.04.5 0905 2.03.7 0 010 .4 0 0 0 156232420198 94.091.395.582.2 166254400241 1.08 .40.62.59 Ct.CA: TuscarawasTrumbullSummitStark 136262395 11 16.427.318.3 3.3 1052 .6....1 01 032 .2.1 0 11 029 .2.6.8 0 1,0371,154 684327 96.780.782.771.7 1,4461,430 827338 2.033.553.51 .83 WarrenVintonVanUnion Wert 1013 71 24.1 8.35.7 .9 03 2.5 0 10 .8.9 0 10 .8 0 108111 90.0115:98.2 122110120 54 .29.13.27 WilliamsWayneWashington 18 23 2.57.3 .7 510 .4.8 00 10 .4 0 102 .4.8 0 115276218227 94.496.691.598.9 231119279 9 2.56.29 WyandotandGrandWood Percentages Totals 9,818 27 24.1 1.53.0 337 0 .9 0 118 0 .3 0 91 0 .2 0 30,270 130 ¶4.498.5 40,670 132 100.00 .32 27 TABLEII
DISTRIBUTION OF GRANTS BY TYPE OF INSTITUTION
1973-74
Grants Private Public 2-Year Public 4-Year All Public All Institutions
No. of Aw&rds 11,008 4810 24,852 29,662 40,670 % of Total\ 27.2 11.6 61.2 72.8 100.0 Dollars $7,953,940 $1,273,969 $7,660,337 $8,934,306 $16,888,246 % of Total 47.2 7.5 45.3 52.8 100.0 Average Award $722 $265 $308 $302 $416
1972-73
No. of Awards 9,511 4,059 22,991 27,050 36,561 % of Total 26.0 11.1 62.9 74.0 100.0 Dollars $7,277,760 $1,079,973 $7,237,255 $8,317,228 $15,594,988 % of Total 46.7 6.9 46.4 53.3 100.0 Average Award $765 $266 $315 $307 $427
DE1
No. of Awards 9,772 1,896 18,302 20,198 29,970 % of Total 32.6 6.3 61.1 67.4 100.0 Dollars $7,732,058 $ 632,657 $6,221,702 $6,854,359 $14,586,417 % of Total 53.0 4.3 42.7 47.0 100.0 $488 Average Award $791 $334 $340 $339
1970-71
No. of Awards 4,728 1,092 9,084 10,176 '4,904 % of Total 31.7 7.3 61.0 68.3 100.0 Dollars $2,570,683 $ 240,668 $1,760,237 $2,000,905 $ 4,571,588 % of Total 56.2 5.3 38.5 43.8 100.0 Average Award $543 $219 $193 $196 $306
28
37 TWO AND FOUR-YEAR PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS TABLE III Institution Stu. No. Tot.Pct. Students Students Black SurnamedSpanish- StudentsOriental StudentsAmerican StudentsIndian Urban Rural Other Residence Indep. Dep.Stu. Parent Parent Stu. Family Family Sgl. Household Dbl. AshlandAntiochBaldwin Wallace 547230 52 5.02.1 .5 951734 03 021 01 446196 34 403 9635 144134 17 24 875 273523222 47 103 474617 233444184 35 BorromeoBlufftonCleveland Inst. Music 280 2430 2.5 .2.3 51 1 0 00 10 229393 2923 264102 1926 203178 514 12 10 455 2330 87 3 380 2721 CapitalChatfieldCedarvilleCase Western College 133696467 13 6.34.21.2 .1 171 73 02 07 014 03 131511 13 593 41 1 103 1292 37 78 125659 6 182 17 7 116514 6 CO Columbus Art & Design DaytonUniversityCleveland Art Inst.Instituteof Dayton Art 682104 2358 6.2 .9.2.5 147 12 96 130 01 01 532 921746 531 168840 151 1816 7 1431 2 651 215690 143 101229 539 134675 EdgecliffDykeDefianceDenison 174191224 94 1.61.72.0 .9 112 183526 1400 20 00 137194 7876 156181 7069 154 181025 1514 07 359177217 94 40714718 134120177 76 HiramHeidelbergFindlay 290341310 2.82.63.1 944062 204 002 0 245224268 213162146 144128148 56 18 8 282468333302 69764357 265267233417 KetteringKenyonJohnLake Carroll Erie 486 522657 4.4 .2.5.5 54 165 03 10 0 428 472550 430 122335 142229 820 442457 1114 5 382146 MariettaMaloneMary Manse 232278 57 2.12.5 .5 131620 030 0 00 212265 39 114 4069 163164 17 10 92 222269103 48 13143831 194247 92143 Mt. St.VernonUnion Joseph Nazarene 208377105 1.91.03.4 055 9 0 29 0 01 208321 96 181 7778 131196 27 2 206375 1955 189322 TWO AND FOUR-YEAR PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS TABLE III Institution Stu. No. Tot.Pct. Students Students Students Black SurnamedSpanish- Oriental AmericanStudents Indian Students OtherUrban Rural Residence Indep. Dep.Stu. Parent Parent Stu. Family Family. Sgl. Household Dbl. MuskingumOberlinNotre Dame 171225 93 1.62.0 .8 1068 420 20 0 215 9786 119 6583 142 5226 13 43 158222 89 2464.13 107201 80 OhioFranklinOhio NorthernDominican Wesleyan 198206545 96 1.85.01.9 .9 51283631 1203 02 00 146512168 65 ,208 143125 80 337 631673 19163o 1 197526190 66 43625546 155483151 50 RioOtterbeinSteubenvilleSt. Grande John 175200307359 1.81.62.83.3 26113030 01 20 0 171161277329 194121158 46 165261 7617 1537 95 185170270350 247344 156151234286 Ch, 'Walsh Ursu1ineUrbanaTiffin 192120 7485 1.71.1 .7.8 231222 5 01 103 0 170 -739669 125 651638 696782 9 10 957 183110 6978 12233032 162 6288 WilmingtonWilberforceWestern College 283176131 36 2.61.61.2 .3 130 721232 10 010 01 210144 23 1 168120 6634 115110 11 2 11 06 170120277 36 66106638 138217 6526 WittenbergGrandXavierWooster Total 11,008 119227 100.0 2.12.4 1,874 6050 45 10 29 03 61 0 8,999 173208 6,664 23140 4,344 2987 504 10,50417 1 251226 2,229 6044 8,779 208183 Percent of Total 17 41111,1111. -- 83 61 39 5 95 20 80 - -30 FOUR YEAR PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS (Branches included) TABLE IV Spanish- American Sgl. Household Dbl. AkronInstitution 1,524 Stu. No. Tot.Pct.6.1 Students Students Black 344 Surnamed 3 StudentsOriental Students Students 6 Indian 0 Other 1,176 1,194Urban RuralResidence 330 Indep. Dep188Stu. 1,336 Stu. Family Family Parent Parent 438 1,086 CentralBowling StateGreen 2,002 591 2.48.1 567516 2331 04 20 1,449 1 1,064 491 938100 4084 1,962 507 403300 1,599 291 ClevelandU. of Cincinnati State 1,7982,936 11.8 7.2 577994 2933 79 14 1,1841,896 1,6982,525 100411 173265 1,6252,671 . . 916508 1,2902,020 Co MiamiKent State 1,1792,758 11.1 4.7 114795 10 3 27 0 1,0601,946 1,611 1,147 685 494 194 45 1,1342,564 212717 2,041 967 Ohio StateUniversity 2,5695,953 10.324.0 1,165 280 1220 36 1 15 1 2,2754,717 1,2643,660 1,3052,293 112514 2,4575,439 1,503 548 2,0214,450 WrightU. of ToledoState 1,183 853 3.44.8 161334 35 2 38 21 685805 935535 248318 123 89 1,094 730 272331 852581 GrandYoungstown Total 24,852 1,506 100.0 6.1 6,080 233 217 16 79 2 27 0 18,449 1 2,212 16,659 8,193 1,901 22,951 6,425997 18,427 509 74 1,432 277 1,229 Percent of Total 24 1 31 - - 74 67 33 8 n2 26 74 TWO-YEAR PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS TABLE V Spanish- American Other Residence Indep. Dep. Parent Parent Sgl.Household Dbl. CuyahogaInstitution (Eastern) Stu. No. Tot.Pct. Students Students Students Students Black Surnamed Oriental Indian Students Urban Rural Sc. ,.1 Stu. Family Family 48 CuyahogaCommunityCommunity (Metro) College College 1,435 84 29.8 1.7 1,096 47 61 0 03 20 273 37 1400 81 35 3 449 17 986 67 881 36 554 CommunityLakelandCuyahoga (Western) College 165281 3.45.9 1225 2 1 0 254 261 9821 1931 146251 4769 118213 Ilk4.4m. Lorain 0 0 0 152 283 67 82 61 304 105 26o CommunitySinclair College 365 7.6 356 36 32 10 01 2;1277 511 81 144 4148 298 294 CentralTechnicalBelmont Ohio College 592 62 12.3 1.3 0 0 0 0 62 0 62 0 62 2 60 TechnicalCincinnati College 159 58 1.23.3 54 1 0 02 0 105 56 146 34 1324 2010 139 48 6o15 9943 TechnicalClark College 188 3.9 39 0 0 32 0 149 105 83 23 165 45 143 TABLE V TWO-YEAR PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS (con-,d) Household mb.ColumbusInstitution Stu. No. Tot.Pct. Students Students Students Students Students Black SurnamedSpanish- Oriental AmericanIndian Other Urban Residence Rural Indep. Stu. Stu.Dep. FamilyParent FamilyParentSgl. Dbl. TechnicalHocking CollegeInstitute 217270 4.55.6 113 4 02 03 oo 213151 210 27 190 60 6124 193209 111 45 159172 TechnicalJeffersonLima InstituteCounty 89 1.9 7 0 0 o 82 36 53 10 79 20 69 MarionTechnical College 127 17 2.6 .4 06 0 0 oO 121 17 55 8 72 9 15 4 112 13 27 5 100 12 MuskingmTechnicalMichael J. AreaCollege Owens 121 2.5 20 6 0 O 95 PT 54 24 97 37 84 TechnicalNorth Central College 152 85 1.83.2 1210 10 0 o 142 72 6237 4890 4 148 81 1423 129 71 TechnicalNorthwest College 45 1.0 0 2 0 33 O 43 1 44 2 43 6 39 TWO-YEAR PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS TABLE(contd) V Institution Stu. No Tot.Pct. Students Students Students Students Students Black SurnamedSpanish- Oriental American Indian Other Urban Residence Rural Indep. Dep.Stu. Parent Parent Stu. Family Family Sgl.Household Dbl. StarkTechnicalScioto College 149 3.2 2 0 0 O 147 52 97 14 135 39 110 TerraTechnical College 143 .9 2 0 0 O 41 29 5 14 0 43 4 39 0101.ft/Washington Technical College 5451 1.1 3 2 10 O 4654 0 4654 81 4650 11lo 4341 PercentGrandTechnical Total of College Total 4,810 100.0 1,864 39% 111 2% 10 3 2,822 59% 3,477 72% 1,333 28% 945 3,86520% 80% 1,910 40% 2,900 60% 314 DISTRIBUTION BY FAMILY GROSS INCOME TABI.1; VI Institution Type of <$4,000 $4,999$4,000 $5,999$5,000 $6,999$6,000 $7,999$7,000 $8,999$8,000 $9,999$9,000 $10,000$10,999 $11,000$13,999 ..:>$14,000 PrivateStudents)(Number of 929 510 598 720 812 957 986 1,186 3,188 1,122 Students)PublicsFour-Year(Number of 3,025 1,366 1,543 1,740 2,003 2,082 2,401 2,493 6,151 2,048 'olam PublicsTwo-Year(Number of Students) TOTAL 1,1535,107 2,238 362 2,489 348 2,793 333 3,185 370 3,390 351 3,747 360 4,042 363 10,284 945 3,395 225 $6,001 Gross Income $6,000 Two-YearFour-YearPrivate Publics Publics 2,0541,8715,996 No. Pct.24.018.739.6 18,856 2,9398,954 No. 60.476.0Pct.81.3 Totals 9,921 35 24.4 30,749 75.6 DISTRIBUTION BY ADJUSTED EFFECTIVE INCOME TABLE VII $4,001 to $5,000 to $6,000 to $7,000 to $8,000 to $9,000 to $10,000 to $11,000 to Institution Type of 4: $4,o00Stu. No. Pct. Stu. No. $4,999 Pct. Stu. No. $5,999 Pct. Stu. No. $6,999 Pct. Stu. No. $7,999 Pct. Stu. No. $8,999 Pct. Stu. No. $9,999 Pct. Stu. No.$10,999 Pct. Stu. No.$13,999 Pct. PrivateFour-Year 821 7.5 503 4.6 681 6.2 822 7.5 1024 9.3 1186 10.8 1745 12.2 1377 12.5 3249 29,4 6011. Two-YearPublics 2459 9.9 1391 5.6 1743 7.0 2056 8.2 2398 9.6 2804 11.2 2971 11.9 2772 11.1 6250 25.5 CYZ TotalsPublics 42891009 17.421.3 2261 367 5.67.8 2799 375 6.97.9 3290 412 8.18.7 3829 407 8.69.4 4426 436 10.9 9.2 4756 440 11.7 9.3 4592 443 11.3 9.4 10428 921 25.617.7 36 DISTRIBUTION OF GRANTS AWARDED BY NUMBER AND AMOUNT TABLE VIII Type of $1100- $1000- $900- $800- $700- $600- $550 $500- $450- $400- $350 $300- $250- $200- $150- $100-0100 PrivateInstitution $1320 1362 $1200 746 $1099 880 1026$999 $899 151 1533$799 1460$699 $599 16 $549 144 1255$499 $449 123 $399 131 1131$349 $299 43 $249 188 $199 541 $149 64 214 PublicFour-Year 3105 1470 1728 66 2758 3572 2823 2707 2926 1345 2397 Cakb PublicTwo-Year 228 241 294 83 315 977 565 614 533 452 508 Total 1362 746 880 1026 151 1533 1460 3349 1855 3277 272 3204 5635 3431 3509 4000 1861 3119 DISTRIBUTION BY ADJUSTED EFFECTIVE INCOME Black Students TABLE IX $4,001 to $5,000 to $6,000 to $7,000 to $8,000 $9,000 to $10,000 to $11,000 to Institution Type of <$4,000Stu. No. Pct. Stu. No. $4,999 Pct. Stu. No. $5,999 Pct. Stu. No. $6,999 Pct. Stu. No. $7,999 Pct. Stu. No. $8, )9 Pct. Stu. No. $9,999 Pct. Stu. No.$10,999 Pct. Stu. No.$13,999 Pct. 4"..-A. Four-YearPublics Private 1403 401 21.422.9 601161 8.69.8 642203 10.510.8 647180 10.6 9.6 638222 10.411.8 637183 10.4 9.8 176516 8.49.4 131369 6.57.0 647217 10.611.6 TotalsPublicsTwo-Year 2500 696 25.538.3 952190 10.5 9.7 1022 177 10.4 9.7 998171 10.2 9.4 999130 10.1 7.2 954134 9.77.4 797105 8.15.8 613 86 4.76.2 992128 10.1 7.0 No. <$6,000 GrossPct. Income No. >$6,001 Pct. 5,095 51.9 38 4,723 48.1 TABLE X BLACK STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY TYPE OF INSTITUTION Institution By Type No.Black Students 1973-74 Pct. No.Black Students 1972-73 Pct. No.3 lack Students 1971-72 Pct. No. Urban 1973-74 Residence Pct. No. Rural Pct. Four-YearPrivates Publics 1,8746,127 19.162.4 1,6085,450 62.518.4 1,3663,807 64.623.2 1,7155,699 91.593.0 428159 7.08.5 Two-Year Publics 1,817 18.5 1,661 100.0 19.1 5,892 719 100.0 12.2 1,7649,178 97.193.5 64o 53 6.52.9 TotalForGrantTotal 1973-74 Recipientsof All 40,670 9,818 100.0 8,719 26,800 65.8 13,870 34.2 twsir Sgl. Household Status 1973-74 Dbl. DEPENDENT CHILDREN IN THE FAMILY 1973-74 institution By Type ----JParent No. Pct. Parent. sa...... 4 No. Pct. 0 Dep 1 Dep 2 Dep 3 Dep 4 Dep 5 Dep >5 Dep Privates4-Year Publics 2,751 811 44.943.3 1,0633,376 56.755.1 6.4%4.7% 391 89 19.0%1,16219.7% 369 20.0%1,27720.5% 384 1,11718.6%19.2% 349 13.8%14.1% 843264 9.3%8.9% 568166 12.4%13.5% 756.253 Total2-Year Publics 1,110 61.1 707 38.9 7.5% 617137 1,87819.1% 347 2,02522.8% 414 1,83116.7% 304 13.5%1,32211.8% 215 9.1%9.o% 897163 1,24812.7%13.o% 237 Total Grant 4,672 47.6 5,146 52.4 6.3% . 19.1% 20.6% 18.6% 3,056 3,442 1973-74Recipients 10,564 25.9 30,106 74.1 1,87b 4.6% 39 9,11022.4% 24.5%9,943 19.6%7,936 12.9%5,225 7.5% 8.5% TABLE XI
DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT RECIPIENTS BY SEX
Male Female Institution By Type Number Percent Number Percent
1973-74
Privates 5,867 53.0 5,141 47.0
Four-Year Publics 11,755 47.0 13,097 53.0
Two-Year Publics 1,880 39.0 2,930 61.0
Total All Institutions 19,502 48.0 21,168 52.0
1972-n
Privates 5,136 54.0 4,375 46.0
Four-Year Publics 11,423 49.6 11,568 50.4
Two-Year Publics 1,714 42.2 2,345 57.8
Total All Institutions 18,273 49.8 18,288 50.2
1971-72
Privates 5,092 54.1 4,324 45.9
Four-Year Publics 7,918 47.5 8,738 52.5
Two-Year Publics 773 44.8 954 55.2
Total All Institutions 13,783 49.6 14,016 50.4
40
40 DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT RECIPIENT3BY AGE TABLE XII Institution By Type 4% 18 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > 24 PrivatesFour-Year Publics 2,013 3,042 2,380 1,896 894 218 113 87 352 Two-Year Publics 4,305 745 6,415 5,067 872 4,138 400 2,068 214 180887 443 350 1,276 Total All Institutions 7,063 10,833 1,376 8,319 6,434 3,176 1,285 685129 119556 2,319 691 Mean Age = 19.3 41 TABLE XIII
DISTRIBUTION OF NUMBER OF WORKING PARENTS IN THE FAMILY
BY TYPE OF INSTITUTION
Number of Parents Working Type of Institution 0 1 2
1973-74
Privates 845 7,397 2,753
Four-Year Publics 2,529 17,124 5,296
Two-Year Publics 1,069 2,888 769
Total 4,443 27,409 8,818
Percent of Total Working = 89.8%
1972-73
Privates 869 6,467 2,175
Four-Year Publics 2,583 15,605 4,803
Two-Year Publics 950 _2,513 596
Total 4,402 24,585 7,574
Percent of Total Working = 87.9%
1971-72
Privates 1,426 6,193 1,797
Four-Year Publics 3,409 10,649 2,598
Two-Year Publics 778 792 157
Total 5,613 17;634 4,552
Percent of Total Working = 79.8%
142
51 TABLE XIV
DISTRIBUTION OF RECIPIENTS BY CLASS LEVEL
Institutions Freshmen Sophomores Juniors Seniors
19 3-74
Privates 3,927 2,932 2,214 1,935
Four-Year Publics 9,876 6,712 4,876 3,388
Two-Year Publics 2,878 1,932
Total 16,681 11,576 7,090 5,323
1972-73
Privates 3,245 2,548 2,020 1,698
Four Year Publics 9,738 5,949 4,338 2,966
Two-Year Publics 2,911 1,148
Total 15,894 9,645 6,358 4,664
1971-72
Privates 3,223 2,525 1,945 1,723
Four-Year Publics 6,574 4,375 3,320 2,387
Two-Year Publics 1,165 562
Total 10,962 7,462 5,265 4,110
43 52 TABLE XV
DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT RECIPIENTS AS PERCENT OF TOTAL FULL-TIME UNDERGRADUATE ENROLLMENT
Total OIG Recipients as Percent of Number of Total Full-TimeTotal Full-Time OIG Undergraduate Undergraduate Private Institutions Recipients Enrollment Enrollment
Antioch College 52 2.4 2,164 Ashland College 230 10.8 2,130 Baldwin-Wallace College 547 26.0 2,098 Bluffton College 280 40.7 688 Borromeo 30 33.3 90 Capital University 467 25.13 1,858 Case Western Reserve University 696 21.3 3,272 Cedarville College 133 13.8 960 Chatfield College 13 26.5 49 Cleveland Institute of Art 104 22.51 462 Cleveland Institute of Music 24 10.3 231 Columbus College of Art & Design 58 12.2 473 Dayton Art Institute 23 16.6 138 Dayton, University of 682 13.0 5,233 Defiance College Ge41, 32.2 695 Denison University 94 4.4 2,121 Dyke College 191 34.1 560 Edgecliff College 174 29.5 589 Findlay College 290 33.4 867 Franklin University 96 9.52 1,008 Heidelberg College 310 26.9 1,151 Hiram College 341 37.0 1,260 John Carroll University 486 19.7 2,465 Kenyon College 57 4.9 1,393 Kettering College of Medical Arts 26 7.7 336 Lake Erie College 52 9.7 532 Malone College 278 40.5 685 Marietta College 232 13.7 1,762 Mary Manse College 57 21.6 263 Mt. St. Joseph on the Ohio 105 15.7 692 Mt. Union College 377 30.0 1,255 Mt. Vernon Nazarene College 208 47.3 439 Muskingum College 225 20.7 1,082 Notre Dame College 93 30.2 307 Oberlin College 171 6.4 2,664 Ohio Dominican College 206 30.1 683 Ohio Northern University 545 27.8 2,005 Ohio Wesleyan University 198 8.0 2,466 Otterbein College 359 29.6 1,209 Rio Grande College 307 48.7 63o St. John College 175 42.8 408 Steubenville, College of 200 25.8 773 Tiffin University 85 25.5 333
1414
53 TABLE XV
DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT RECIPIENTP, AS PERCENT OF TOTAL FULL-TIME UNDERGRADUATE ENROLLMENT (contd)
Total OIG Recipients as Percent of Number of Total Full-Time Total Full-Time OIG Undergraduate Undergraduate Private Institutions Recipients Enrollment Enrollment
Urbana College 120 26.9 445 Ursuline College 74 28.5 259 Walsh College 192 35.6 538 Western College 36 10.8 333 Wilberforce University 131 11.8 1,107 Wilmington College 176 27.4 642 Wittenberg University 283 12.7 2,325 Wooster, College of 227 12.5 1,805 Xavier University 268 13.6 12.967
Total 11,008 18.3 59,851
Public Institutions
Akron, University of 1,524 17.2 8,857 Bowling Green State University 2,002 14.6 13,646 Central State University 591 33.5 1,763 Cincinnati, University of 2,936 16.3 17,977 Cleveland State University 1,798 21.2 8,455 Kent State University 2,758 15.9 17,299 Miami University 1,179 8.9 13,213 Ohio State University 5,953 17.0. 34,900 Ohio University 2,569 17.0 15,100 University of Toledo 1,183 16.5 7,148 Wright State University 853 16.5 5,154 Youngstown State University 1,506 19.4 7,748
Cuyahoga Community College (Eastern) 84 17.8 470 Cuyahoga Community College (Metro) 1,435 38.7 3,700 Cuyahoga Community College (Western) 282 12.4 2,258 Lakeland Community College 165 9.7 1,697 Lorain County Community College 365 20.3 1,790 Sinclair Community College 592 26.1 2,260
Belmont Technical College 62 25.5 243 Central Ohio Technical College 58 20.6 281 Cincinnati Technical College 159 21.1 753 Clark Technical College 188 27.2 689 Columbus Technical Institute 27o 19.5 1,383 Hocking Technical College 217 27.1 799 Jefferson County Technical Institute 89 21.6 412
45
54 TABLES XV
DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT RECIPIENTS AS PERCENT OF TOTAL FULL-TIME UNDERGRADUATE ENROLLMENT
(contd) Total OIG Recipients as Percent of Number of Total Full-Time Total Full-Time OIG Undergraduate Undergraauate PublicInstitutions Recipients Enrollment Eni:ilment
Lima Technical College 127 34.9 363 Marion Technical College 17 8.9 190 vichael J. Owens Technical College 121 17.5 688 dkingum Area Technical College 152 30.4 500 .north Central Technical College 85 16.4 517 Northwest Technical College 45 18.9 238 Scioto Technics' College 149 407 Stark Technical College 43 401 Terra Technical College 51 10.7 473 Washington Technical College 54 42.1 128
TOTAL 29,662 15.7 171,900
46 TABLE XVI
DISTRIBUTION OF GRANTS IN DOLLARS BY INSTITUTION
Private Institutions Total Grant Dollars
Antioch College 22,239.00 Ashland College 171,300.00 Baldwin-Wallace College 377,400.00 Borromeo College 23,055.00 Bluffton College 213,631.00 Cleveland Institute of Music 17,340.00 Capital University 346,410.00 Case Western Reserve University 504,560.00 Cedarville College 95,875.00 Chatfield College 5,880.00 Cleveland Institute of Art 74,835.00 Columbus College of Art & Design 46,575.00 Dayton, University of 499,610.00 Dayton Art Institute 18,805.00 67,380.00 . Denison University Defiance College 157,155.00 Dyke College 144,220.00 Edgecliff College 126,672.00 Findlay College 215,630.00 Franklin University 55,387.00 Heidelberg College 215,482.00 Hiram College 258,500.00 John Carroll University 343,481.m Kenyon College 43,530.00 Kettering College of Medical Arts 17,220.00 Lake Erie College 42,450.00 Malone College 201,200.00 Marietta College 165,541.00 Mary Manse College 42,810.00 Mt. St. Joseph on the Ohio 77,585.00 Mt. Union College 263,280.00 Mt. Vernon Nazarene College 150,175.00 Muskingum College 159,195.00 Notre Dame College 62,400.00 Oberlin College 131,985.00 Ohio Dominican College 151,560.00 Ohio Northern University 375,035.00 Ohio Wesleyan University 154,960.00 Otterbein College 260,110.00 Rio Grande College 236,832.00 St. John College 124,450.00 Steubenville, College of 153,705.00 Tiffin University 61,474.00 Urbana College 85,330.00 Ursuline College 53,560.00 Walsh College 135,937.00 Western College 28,490.00 Wilberforce University 114,615.00 Wilmington College 123,361.00
56 TABLES XVI
DISTRIBUTION OF GRANTS IN DOLLARS BY INSTITUTION (contd)
Private Institutions Total Grant Dollars
Wittenberg University $ 196,482.00 Wooster, College of 150,910.00 Xavier University 188 314.00
Sub al $ 7,953,940.00
Four-Year Public Institutions
Akron, University of 468,338.00 Bowling Green State University 617,847.00 Central State University 230,216.00 Cincinnati, University of 940,106.00 Cleveland State University 558,758.00 Kent State University 864,008.00 Miami University -350,453.00 Ohio State University 1,802,992.00 Ohio University 785,753.00 Toledo, The University of 338,728.00 Wright State University 253,420.00 Youngstown State University 449,718.00
Sub Total 4 $ 7,660,337.00
Two-Year Public Institutions
Cuyahoga Community College (Eastern) 16,951.00 Cuyahoga Community College (Metro) 318,072.00 Cuyahoga Community College (Western) 62,477.00 Lakeland Community College 45,729.00 Lorain County Community College 94,208.00 Sinclair Community College 165,497.00
Belmont Technical College 16,050.00 Central Ohio Technical College 16,450.00 Cincinnati Technical College 55,170.00 Clark Technical College 57,484,40 Columbus Technical Institute 79,710.00 Hocking Technical College 65,335.00 Jefferson County Technical Institute 21,356.00 Lima Technical College 40,010.00 Marion Technical College 4,950.00 Michael J. Owens Technical College 32,143.00 Muskingum Area Technical College 48,840.00 North Central Technical College 26,590.00 Northwest Technical College 13,220.00
48 5' TABLES XVI
DISTRIBUTION OF GRANTS IN DOLLARS BY INST Tu2ION (contd4--s.,s.
Two-Year Public Institutions Total Grant Dollars
Scioto Technical College $ 49,732.00 Stark Technical College 12,510.00 Terra Technical College 14,360.00 Washington Technical College 17 125.00
Sub Total $1,273,969.00
Grand Total $16,888,246.00
49
58