Grand Canyon 6 Night Trip Information Packet
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Thunder River Trail and Deer Creek
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Grand Canyon Grand Canyon National Park Arizona Thunder River Trail and Deer Creek The huge outpourings of water at Thunder River, Tapeats Spring, and Deer Spring have attracted people since prehistoric times and today this little corner of Grand Canyon is exceedingly popular among seekers of the remarkable. Like a gift, booming streams of crystalline water emerge from mysterious caves to transform the harsh desert of the inner canyon into absurdly beautiful green oasis replete with the music of falling water and cool pools. Trailhead access can be difficult, sometimes impossible, and the approach march is long, hot and dry, but for those making the journey these destinations represent something close to canyon perfection. Locations/Elevations Mileages Indian Hollow (6250 ft / 1906 m) to Bill Hall Trail Junction (5400 ft / 1647 m): 5.0 mi (8.0 km) Monument Point (7200 ft / 2196 m) to Bill Hall Junction: 2.6 mi (4.2 km) Bill Hall Junction, AY9 (5400 ft / 1647 m) to Surprise Valley Junction, AM9 (3600 ft / 1098 m): 4.5 mi ( 7.2 km) Upper Tapeats Camp, AW7 (2400 ft / 732 m): 6.6 mi ( 10.6 km) Lower Tapeats, AW8 at Colorado River (1950 ft / 595 m): 8.8 mi ( 14.2 km) Deer Creek Campsite, AX7 (2200 ft / 671 m): 6.9 mi ( 11.1 km) Deer Creek Falls and Colorado River (1950 ft / 595 m): 7.6 mi ( 12.2 km) Maps 7.5 Minute Tapeats Amphitheater and Fishtail Mesa Quads (USGS) Trails Illustrated Map, Grand Canyon National Park (National Geographic) North Kaibab Map, Kaibab National Forest (good for roads) Water Sources Thunder River, Tapeats Creek, Deer Creek, and the Colorado River are permanent water sources. -
The Rye Creek Project: Archaeology in the Upper Tonto Basin
The Rye Creek Project: Archaeology in the Upper Tonto Basin Volume 3: Synthesis and Conclusions Mark D. Elson Douglas B. Craig Contributions by Walter H. Birkby Maria H. Czuzak William L. Deaver Alan Ferg Laura C. Fulginiti Elizabeth Miksa Henry Wallace Center for Desert Archaeology Anthropological Papers No. 11 The Rye Creek Project: Archaeology in the Upper Tonto Basin Volume 3: Synthesis and Conclusions Mark D. Elson Douglas B. Craig Contributions by Walter H. Birkby Maria H. Czuzak William L. Deaver Alan Ferg Laura C. Fulginiti Elizabeth J. Miksa Henry D. Wallace Submitted to Arizona Department of Transportation Phoenix, Arizona Contract No. 88-36 Center for Desert Archaeology Anthropological Papers No. 11 1992 ii Cover Center for Desert Archaeology 3975 North Tucson Boulevard Tucson, Arizona 85716 (602) 881-2244 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................. vii LIST OF TABLES ................................................................. ix PART 5: SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................... 1 23. WESTERN APACHE AND YAVAPAI POTTERY AND FEATURES FROM THE RYE CREEK PROJECT By Alan Ferg ................................... 3 WESTERN APACHE AND YAVAPAI HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY IN THE RYE CREEK AREA .................................................... 3 Ethnographic Information for the Area . 3 Western Apache and Yavapai Archaeological Remains .............................. 7 THE DEER CREEK SITE, AZ 0:15:52 ............................................ 8 Feature -
Study Proposal Guidelines
United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Grand Canyon National Park Research Office 1824 S. Thompson Street, Suite 200 Flagstaff, AZ 86001 928-638-7447 GUIDELINES FOR STUDY PROPOSALS Your proposal should include each of the required information items listed below, in enough detail that an educated non-specialist can understand exactly what you plan to do. If you have already prepared a relevant proposal for a funding application, work plan, formal agreement, or similar document, then your original proposal likely will satisfy NPS proposal requirements. The primary area where new information may be necessary concerns the ability of the park to assess what, if any, impacts your research may have on park resources. You should compare your original proposal to these guidelines to be certain that you have provided all the required information. If additional information is required, you can provide it to the Research Coordinator as a supplement to your proposal, as appropriate. If a required topic does not apply to your proposed study, simply list the topic and write “non-applicable.” The length of your proposal depends primarily on the complexity of the work planned. In some cases, a proposal may consist of 1-2 pages for a study expected to have no significant impact on park resources or visitor experiences. However, proposals for lengthy or complex research problems, for extensive collecting, and for work with special status species of sensitive cultural resources are typically longer, more detailed, and well-organized. Incomplete, disorganized, or illegible proposals will be returned for revision. I. INTRODUCTION A. Title B. -
Thunder River Trail and Deer Creek
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Grand Canyon Grand Canyon National Park Arizona Thunder River Trail and Deer Creek The huge outpourings of water at Thunder River, Tapeats Spring, and Deer Spring have attracted people since prehistoric times and today this little corner of Grand Canyon is exceedingly popular among seekers of the remarkable. Like a gift, booming streams of crystalline water emerge from mysterious caves to transform the harsh desert of the inner canyon into absurdly beautiful green oasis replete with the music of water falling into cool pools. Trailhead access can be difficult, sometimes impossible, and the approach march is long, hot and dry, but for those making the journey these destinations represent something close to canyon perfection. Updates and Closures Climbing and/or rappelling in the creek narrows, with or without the use of ropes or other technical equipment is prohibited. This restriction extends within the creek beginning at the southeast end of the rock ledges, known as the “Patio” to the base of Deer Creek Falls. The trail from the river to hiker campsites and points up-canyon remains open. This restriction is necessary for the protection of significant cultural resources. Locations/Elevations Mileages Indian Hollow (6250 ft / 1906 m) to Bill Hall Trail Junction (5400 ft / 1647 m): 5.0 mi (8.0 km) Monument Point (7200 ft / 2196 m) to Bill Hall Junction: 2.6 mi (4.2 km) Bill Hall Junction, AY9 (5400 ft / 1647 m) to Surprise Valley Junction, AM9 (3600 ft / 1098 m): 4.5 mi ( 7.2 km) Upper Tapeats Camp, AW7 (2400 ft / 732 m): 6.6 mi ( 10.6 km) Lower Tapeats, AW8 at Colorado River (1950 ft / 595 m): 8.8 mi ( 14.2 km) Deer Creek Campsite, AX7 (2200 ft / 671 m): 6.9 mi ( 11.1 km) Deer Creek Falls and Colorado River (1950 ft / 595 m): 7.6 mi ( 12.2 km) Maps 7.5 Minute Tapeats Amphitheater and Fishtail Mesa Quads (USGS) Trails Illustrated Map, Grand Canyon National Park (National Geographic) North Kaibab Map, Kaibab National Forest (USDA) Trailhead Access Leave the pavement on Forest Service Road (FSR) 22. -
(Storied Rocks): Southern Paiute Rock Art in the Colorado River Corridor
Tumpituxwinap (Storied Rocks): Southern Paiute Rock Art in the Colorado River Corridor Item Type Report Authors Stoffle, Richard W.; Loendorf, Lawrence L.; Austin, Diane E.; Halmo, David B.; Bulletts, Angelita S.; Fulfrost, Brian K. Publisher Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology, University of Arizona Download date 11/10/2021 13:09:00 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/279732 T UMPIT UXWINAP (STORIED ROCKS) Version 2 Southern Paiute Consortium Pipe Spring, Arizona and Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona Report of work carried out under the Southern Paiute Consortium CooperativeAgreement with the Bureau of Reclamation, #4 -FC -40 -15260 TUMPITUXWINAP (STORIED ROCKS): SOUTHERN PAIUTE ROCK ART IN THE COLORADO RIVER CORRIDOR Version 2 (For Public Distribution) Prepared for: David Wegner Glen Canyon Environmental Studies Bureau of Reclamation Flagstaff, Arizona Prepared by: Richard W. Stoffle Lawrence L. Loendorf Diane E. Austin David B. Halmo Angelita S. Bulletts Brian K. Fulfrost Southern Paiute Consortium Pipe Spring, Arizona and The Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona September 1995 Report of work carried out under the Southern Paiute Consortium Cooperative Agreement with the Bureau of Reclamation, #4 -FC-40 -15260 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables vii List of Figures viii Acknowledgements xi A Note on Transcriptional Practice xiii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Tiering 2 Common Ground 2 Rock Art (Thmpituxwinap) Terms 3 Approaches to Rock Art -
Hydrogeology of the Tapeats Amphitheater and Deer
HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE TAPEATS AMPHITHEATER AND DEER BASIN, GRAND CANYON, ARIZONA : A STUDY IN KARST HYDROLOGY by Peter Wesley Huntoon A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the COMMITTEE ON HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1968 AC NOWLEDGEMENT The writer gratefully acknowledges Drs . John W . Harshbarger, Jerome J . Wright, Daniel D . Evans and Evans B . Mayo for their careful reading of the manuscript and their many helpful suggestions . t is with deepfelt appreciation that the writer acknowledges his wife, Susan, for the hours she spent in typing this thesis . An assistantship from the Museum of Northern Arizona and a fellowship from the National Defense Education Act, Title V, provided-the funds necessary to carry out this work . TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa aP L ST OF TABLES vii L ST OF LLUSTRAT ONS viii ABSTRACT x NTRODUCT ON 1 Location 1 Topography and Drainage 1 Climate and Vegetation 2 Topographic Maps 4 Accessibility 5 Objectives of the Thesis ' . , 6 Method of Study . 7 Previous Work , , , , , , , , , , , , 7 ROC UN TS : L THOLOG C AND WATER BEAR NG PROPERT ES , , 10 Definition of Permeability 11 Precambrian Rocks 12 Paleozoic Rocks 13 Tonto Group 15 Tapeats Sandstone 15 Bright Angel Shale , 16 Muav Limestone 17 Temple Butte Limestone 19 Redwall Limestone , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 20 Aubrey Group - ' - 22 Supai Formation 23 Hermit Shale 25 Coconino Sandstone , 25 Toroweap Formation 26 aibab Formation 27 Cenozoic -
Creating a Native Sport Fishery: Legacy of the White Salmon by Dan Wilson
Creating a Native Sport Fishery: Legacy of the White Salmon By Dan Wilson The tailwaters of Glen Canyon Dam support a popular blue ribbon trout fishery which brings in millions of dollars annually. Sport anglers strongly support rainbow trout fisheries because of the sport involved in catching rainbow trout, the delicious taste and because rainbow trout are very photogenic. It is unfortunate that the support of the sport fishery in the Grand Canyon is focused on an alien fish. Alien fishes have contributed to demise of native fishes not only in the Grand Canyon but around North America (Wilson 2005 this edition, Moyle et al. 1987). In Wilson (2005), I proposed that after drastic reductions in alien fish populations and an increase in native populations that the aura of the sport fishery should be focused more on the reintroduction of the Colorado pikeminnow (aka The White Salmon) (see figure 1). Irving and Modde (2000) believe that Colorado pikeminnow will use habitat if they are given access to it. Throughout my journey in the Grand Canyon, I was curious to see if there were any tributaries that had potential to provide habitat for the Colorado pikeminnow. The purpose of this flog is to summarize my analysis of the tributaries with respect to their potential in providing habitat to the reintroduced Colorado Pikeminnow. Figure 1: Colorado Pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius). Photo courtesy of Colorado State University Larval Fish Laboratory (http://www.cnr.colostate.edu/lfl). The tributaries which I observed (Shimano Creek, Elves Chasm, Tapeats Creek, Deer Creek and Kanab Creek) seem too small for ideal habitat for Colorado Pikeminnow. -
Observations of Environmental Change in Grand Canyon, Arizona
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with the GRAND CANYON MONITORING AND RESEARCH CENTER Observations of Environmental Change in Grand Canyon, Arizona Water-Resources Investigations Report 02–4080 COVER PHOTOGRAPH November 1911. Ellsworth (left) and Emery Kolb displaying native fishes caught in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon during their 1911 expedition (Kolb photograph 5739, courtesy of Special Collections, the Cline LIbrary, Northern Arizona University). Observations of Environmental Change in Grand Canyon, Arizona By Robert H. Webb, Theodore S. Melis, and Richard A. Valdez U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4080 Prepared in cooperation with GRAND CANYON MONITORING AND RESEARCH CENTER Tucson, Arizona 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: DistrictRegional Chief Research Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services 1201345 Middlefield Pacific Avenue Road – Suite 600 Building 810 Tacoma,Menlo Park, Washington California 98402 94025 Box 25286, Federal Center http://water.usgs.gov/nrp http://wa.water.usgs.gov Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................................................ -
Colorado River Miles Chart
FOREWORD This river mile index for the Lower Colorado River lists river mileages that were determined from measurements made on Bureau of Reclamation aerial orthophotographs and U.S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangles. The Geological Survey and Bureau of Reclamation furnished information on stream gage locations, drainage areas and water surface elevation. River mile distances were measured upstream to the nearest tenth of a mile. The starting point for the Lower Colorado River mile index is at the southerly international boundary with Mexico. In cases where tributary washes did not have a well defined channel from the Colorado River to where they met the valley floor, the starting point was located at a latitude and longitude where the channel was well defined. Tributaries are shown as entering from the right or left from a position facing downstream. Elevation of water surface is shown at the average elevations in impoundments. The discharge pattern of the Colorado River between Davis Dam and Imperial Dam is influenced by daily power demands and seasonal irrigation and municipal and industrial requirements. The water surface elevations shown for this reach represent typical daily highs occurring during the summer period. This index was prepared by the Boulder Canyon Operations Office, Lower Colorado Region, Bureau of Reclamation. August 2001 RIVER MILE INDEX LOWER COLORADO RIVER River M ile Description Drainage Water Elev. Location Area Miles Sq. Miles Feet 0.0 Southerly International Boundary (L) 0.2 Stream gage, IBWC- 09522200, Colorado River at Southerly International Boundary near SAN LUIS, Arizona (R) 243,000 75.7 2.4 Outlet of Hunter=s Hole and Twenty-One Mile Mile Wasteway (L) 6.1 GADSDEN, Arizona (L) 18.8 Eleven Mile Wasteway (L) 21.6 Cooper Wasteway (old location) (L) 22.0 Main Outlet Drain-M.O.D.E. -
A Water Quality Investigation of Seventeen Grand Canyon Tributaries: July 2004 – May 2005
A WATER QUALITY INVESTIGATION OF SEVENTEEN GRAND CANYON TRIBUTARIES: JULY 2004 – MAY 2005 i A Water Quality Investigation of Seventeen Grand Canyon Tributaries: July 2004 – May 2005 ______________________________________________________________________________ Prepared by Division of Water Surface Water Section Monitoring Unit 1110 W. Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Lin Lawson, Editor Contributors Lee Johnson Jason Jones Doug McCarty Kyle Palmer Steven Pawlowski Sam Rector Patti Spindler Roland Williams The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality shall preserve, protect and enhance the environment and public health, and shall be a leader in the development of public policy to maintain and improve the quality of Arizona’s air, land and water resources. Printed on recycled paper Publication Number OFR-07-04 i A Water Quality Investigation of Seventeen Grand Canyon Tributaries: July 2004 – May 2005 ______________________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report could not have been written without the hard work and dedication of the following ADEQ staff who worked on the field crews in the heat of the summer and in the cold rains of winter: Roland Williams, Lee Johnson, Doug McCarty, Kyle Palmer, Sam Rector, Patti Spindler, Susan Fitch, Amanda Fawley, Jennifer Hickman, Jason Sutter, Steve Pawlowski, Marty Schlein, and Andy Salmon. This report would not have been written without the work of Lin Lawson, our editor-in-chief. We’d like to express our thanks to Dr. Emma Benanati, research coordinator at the Grand Canyon National Park Research Office for her assistance in obtaining the necessary Scientific Research and Collecting Permit for this research and for her help on the river. A special thanks goes to Dr. -
Historical and 2009 Water Chemistry of Wells, Perennial and Intermittent Streams, and Springs in Northern Arizona
Historical and 2009 Water Chemistry of Wells, Perennial and Intermittent Streams, and Springs in Northern Arizona By Donald J. Bills, Fred D Tillman, David W. Anning, Ronald C. Antweiler, and Thomas F. Kraemer Chapter C of Hydrological, Geological, and Biological Site Characterization of Breccia Pipe Uranium Deposits in Northern Arizona Edited by Andrea E. Alpine Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5025 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................141 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................141 Hydrogeologic Setting...............................................................................................................................143 Surface Water ...................................................................................................................................143 South of the Colorado River ...................................................................................................143 North of the Colorado River ...................................................................................................143 Groundwater ......................................................................................................................................144 Relation of Hydrologic Flow Components to Breccia -
Hualapai Tribe
HUALAPAI TRIBE Department of Cultural Resources EVALUATING HUALAPAI CULTURAL RESOURCES ALONG THE COLORADO RIVER FY 2015 REPORT Prepared by: Loretta Jackson-Kelly, Principal Investigator Peter Bungart, Co-Principal Investigator, Senior Archaeologist Dawn Hubbs, Contributor Carrie Cannon, Ethnobotanist Bennett Wakayuta, Cultural Resource Specialist Hualapai Department of Cultural Resources P.O. Box 310 Peach Springs, Arizona 86434 Submitted to: Bureau of Reclamation Upper Colorado Regional Office 125 South State Street Salt Lake City, UT 84138-102 Agreement No. R13AP40004 January 2016 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 2 HUALAPAI CULTURAL BELIEFS AND TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE .................................................................... 6 METHODS, SITES, AND ANALYSIS .........................................................8 FIELD SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................9 TCP EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................12 BOTANICAL TRANSECTS BACKGROUND AND METHODS……….41 BOTANICAL TRANSECTS RESULTS………………………………….42 National Canyon …………………………………………………….42 Granite Park………………………………………………………….49 SUMMARY……………………………………………………………….54 2015 TCP Evaluations: Impacts and Recommendations…………...55 REFERENCES CITED……………………………………………………57 1 HUALAPAI TRIBE DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES: EVALUATING HUALAPAI CULTURAL RESOURCES ALONG THE COLORADO RIVER MAY 29 – June 9, 2015 INTRODUCTION The Hualapai Tribe has a