(Storied Rocks): Southern Paiute Rock Art in the Colorado River Corridor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Storied Rocks): Southern Paiute Rock Art in the Colorado River Corridor Tumpituxwinap (Storied Rocks): Southern Paiute Rock Art in the Colorado River Corridor Item Type Report Authors Stoffle, Richard W.; Loendorf, Lawrence L.; Austin, Diane E.; Halmo, David B.; Bulletts, Angelita S.; Fulfrost, Brian K. Publisher Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology, University of Arizona Download date 11/10/2021 13:09:00 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/279732 T UMPIT UXWINAP (STORIED ROCKS) Version 2 Southern Paiute Consortium Pipe Spring, Arizona and Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona Report of work carried out under the Southern Paiute Consortium CooperativeAgreement with the Bureau of Reclamation, #4 -FC -40 -15260 TUMPITUXWINAP (STORIED ROCKS): SOUTHERN PAIUTE ROCK ART IN THE COLORADO RIVER CORRIDOR Version 2 (For Public Distribution) Prepared for: David Wegner Glen Canyon Environmental Studies Bureau of Reclamation Flagstaff, Arizona Prepared by: Richard W. Stoffle Lawrence L. Loendorf Diane E. Austin David B. Halmo Angelita S. Bulletts Brian K. Fulfrost Southern Paiute Consortium Pipe Spring, Arizona and The Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona September 1995 Report of work carried out under the Southern Paiute Consortium Cooperative Agreement with the Bureau of Reclamation, #4 -FC-40 -15260 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables vii List of Figures viii Acknowledgements xi A Note on Transcriptional Practice xiii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Tiering 2 Common Ground 2 Rock Art (Thmpituxwinap) Terms 3 Approaches to Rock Art Studies 4 Impressionism 5 Science 5 Ethnoculture 6 GCES Rock Art Study 7 Interdisciplinarity 8 Multivocality 8 Key Study Findings 9 CHAPTER TWO OUR HOMELAND 11 CHAPTER THREE A SCIENTIST'S PERSPECTIVE 18 Grand Canyon Rock Art 19 Dating of Rock Art 20 Petroglyphs 20 Pictographs 21 Ethnography and Rock Art 22 The Relationship of Rock Art to Shamans in the Grand Canyon 23 Kanab Creek Site #4 as an Example 26 Rock Art Types or Styles and Chronology 29 Great Basin Abstract Styles 31 Glen Canyon Style V 32 Grand Canyon Polychrome Style 33 Tapering -body Human Figures 34 Western Anasazi and Fremont Rock Art 34 Cave Valley Style 35 Southern Paiute Pictographs 36 Conclusions and Recommendations 38 i CHAPTER FOUR ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW 41 Cultural Landscapes 41 Holy Lands 45 Regional Landscapes 46 Ecoscapes 47 Storyscapes 47 Landmarks 48 Southern Paiute Cultural Landscapes 48 The Paiute Holy Land 49 Grand Canyon as a Paiute Regional Landscape 49 Kanab Creek as a Paiute Ecoscape 50 Trails and the Cry as Paiute Songscapes 52 Vulcan's Anvil as a Paiute Landmark 52 Boundaries and Joint Use 53 Interaction Patterns 55 Rock Art Rules 56 CHAPTER FIVE ROCK ART IN THE COLORADO RIVER CORRIDOR 58 Methods 58 Overview of Findings 60 Sacred Paint 60 Stories and Legends 61 Site -by -Site Interpretation 61 Site 1 - C:03:006 62 Southern Paiute Interpretation 62 Archaeologist's Commentary 64 Site 2 - C:02:038 65 Southern Paiute Interpretation 66 Archaeologist's Commentary 68 Site 3 - C:02:037 69 Southern Paiute Interpretation 69 Archaeologist's Commentary 71 Site 4 - C:02:013 73 Southern Paiute Interpretation 73 Archaeologist's Commentary 75 Site 5 - C:02:056 76 Southern Paiute Interpretation 76 Archaeologist's Commentary 78 Site 6 - C:02:104 79 Southern Paiute Interpretation 80 Archaeologist's Commentary 81 Site 7 - C:06:005 82 Southern Paiute Interpretation 83 Archaeologist's Commentary 84 Site 8 - C:05:001 85 Southern Paiute Interpretation 86 Archaeologist's Commentary 88 Site 9 - C:13:003 88 Southern Paiute Interpretation 89 Site 10 - C:13:132 89 Southern Paiute Interpretation 90 Archaeologist's Commentary 92 Site 11 - C:13:322 93 Southern Paiute Interpretation 93 Archaeologist's Commentary 95 Site 12 - Deer Creek Rock Art Site 96 Southern Paiute Interpretation 97 Archaeologist's Commentary 99 Site 14 - A:16:163 101 Southern Paiute Interpretation 102 Archaeologist's Commentary 104 Site 15 - A:16:181 105 Southern Paiute Interpretation 105 Archaeologist's Commentary 107 Site 16 - A:16:172 108 Southern Paiute Interpretation 108 Archaeologist's Commentary 110 Site 17 - A:16:179 111 Southern Paiute Interpretation 111 Archaeologist's Commentary 112 Site 18 - A:16:001 113 Southern Paiute Interpretation 115 Archaeologist's Commentary 117 Site 19 - A: 16:159 117 Southern Paiute Interpretation 118 Archaeologist's Commentary 119 Site 20 - A:15:018 120 Southern Paiute Interpretation 121 Archaeologist's Commentary 121 Site 22 - A:15:005 122 Southern Paiute Interpretation 124 Archaeologist's Commentary 126 Site 23 - Spring Canyon Rock Art Site 126 Southern Paiute Interpretation 126 Archaeologist's Commentary 128 iii Site 24 - G:03:077 128 Southern Paiute Interpretation 130 Archaeologist's Commentary 131 Site 25 - G:03:080 131 Southern Paiute Interpretation 132 Archaeologist's Commentary 134 Patterns 135 Cultural Significance of Rock Art Panels for Southern Paiute People 136 Uses of Rock Art Panels 139 Past Uses of Panels 140 Current Uses of Rock Art Panels 143 Patterns of Response Based on Gender 145 Cultural Transmission 147 How Sites Are Interconnected 148 Discussion 150 CHAPTER SIX KANAV 'UIPI (WILLOW CANYON) ECOSCAPE STUDY 152 Defining the Ecoscape 152 Physical Parameters 153 Cultural Parameters 153 Region of Refuge 155 The Ghost Dance 157 Methods 161 Archaeologist's Commentary 161 Numbering System 162 Kanav 'Uipi Rock Art Sites 163 Kanab Creek Site # 1 163 Southern Paiute Interpretations 163 Archaeologist's Commentary 165 Kanab Creek Site # 2 166 Southern Paiute Interpretations 167 Archaeologist's Commentary 167 Kanab Creek Site # 3 169 Southern Paiute Interpretations 170 Archaeologist's Commentary 171 Ethnographic Commentary 171 Kanab Creek Site # 4 171 Southern Paiute Interpretations 172 Archaeologist's Commentary 175 Kanab Creek Site # 5 -- (Forest Service Site # AR- 03 -07 -03 -1019) 175 Southern Paiute Interpretations 176 Archaeologist's Commentary 179 iv Kanab Creek Site # 6 -- (Forest Service Site # AR -03 -07 -03 -1252) 182 Southern Paiute Interpretations 183 Archaeologist's Commentary 185 Kanab Creek Site # 7 -- (Forest Service Site # AR -03 -07 -03 -1264) 186 Southern Paiute Interpretations 187 Archaeologist's Commentary 188 Kanab Creek Site # 8 -- (Forest Service Site # AR- 03 -07 -03 -1267) 189 Southern Paiute Interpretations 192 Archaeologist's Commentary 193 Ethnographic Commentary 195 Additional Site Interpretations 195 Forest Service Site # AR -03 -07 -03 -1265 195 Southern Paiute Interpretations 196 Archaeologist's Commentary 196 Forest Service Site # AR- 03 -07 -03 -1256 197 Southern Paiute Interpretations 197 Archaeologist's Commentary 197 Forest Service Site # AR- 03 -07 -03 -1258 199 Southern Paiute Interpretations 200 Archaeologist's Commentary 200 Forest Service Site # AR 03 -07 -03 -1284 200 Southern Paiute Interpretations 201 Archaeologist's Commentary 201 CHAPTER SEVEN TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PROPERTIES 203 Defining Traditional Cultural Properties 203 Southern Paiute TCPs in the Colorado River Corridor Landmarks and Ecoscapes 205 Salt Cave Landmark 205 Southern Paiute Interpretations 205 Ethnographic Commentary 206 Vulcan's Anvil Landmark 207 Southern Paiute Interpretations 207 Ethnographic Commentary 209 The Vulcan's Anvil -Lava Falls Complex: An Ecoscape TCP? 210 Ompi (Hematite) Cave 212 Southern Paiute Interpretations 213 Ethnographic Commentary 213 Pumpkin Spring Landmark 214 Southern Paiute Interpretations 214 Ethnographic Commentary 215 Deer Creek Valley and Falls Ecoscape 216 Southern Paiute Interpretations 216 v Ethnographic Commentary 219 Granite Park Ecoscape 221 Southern Paiute Interpretations 221 Ethnographic Commentary 221 Summary 222 The National Register of Historic Places 222 Eligibility for Nomination to the National Register 223 The Current State of TCP Research and Protection 224 Historic, Cultural, and Ethnographic Landscapes 225 Conclusion 225 CHAPTER EIGHT MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 227 Laws for Protecting Cultural Resources 228 National Historic Preservation Act 229 American Indian Religious Freedom Act 230 Individual Paiute Recommendations 230 Perceived Impacts 230 Impacts from Natural Elements 231 Impacts from Human Activities 233 Southern Paiute Consortium Recommendations for Protecting and Managing Cultural Resources in the Colorado River Corridor 237 References Cited 239 Appendices 252 Appendix A Ethnoarchaeology - Rock Art Interview Form 253 Appendix B Terms That Indicate Frequency of Southern Paiute Responses 262 Appendix C Relationship Between Rating of Rock Art Panels and Other Variables 263 Appendix D Southern Paiute Responses to Rock Art Panels Based on Gender 264 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 5.1. Perceived Importance of Rock Art Panels and Sites 136 Table 5.2. Relationship Between Importance of Rock Art Panel and Site 137 Table 5.3. Relationship Between Kind of Rock Art Panels and their Perceived Significance 137 Table 5.4. Relationship Between Perception that Rock Art Panels are Affected by Natural Elements and Their Significance 138 Table 5.5. Relationship Between Perception that Rock Art Panels are Affected by Human Activities and Their Significance 138 Table 5.6. Southern Paiute Past and Present Use of Rock Art Panels Visited on River Trips (Proportion of Representatives who Visited or Used the Panels) 140 Table 5.7. Southern Paiute Past and Present Use of Rock Art Panels Like Those Visited on River Trips (Proportion of Representatives who Visited or Used the Panels) 141 Table 5.8. Purposes for Which Southern Paiutes Made, Visited, or Used the Rock Art Panels 142 Table 5.9. Past Family Visitation or Use of Rock Art Panels 143 Table 5.10. Current Southern Paiute Visitation or Use of Rock Art Panels 144 Table 5.11. Current Family Visitation or Use of Rock Art Panels 145 Table 5.12. Past and Current Use of Site By Gender 146 Table 5.13. Gender -based Perceptions of Use of Panels for Ceremonial Purposes 147 Table 5.14. Cultural Transmission of Information About Rock Art Panels Based on Gender 148 Table 5.15. Who is Being Taught About Rock Art Panels 148 Table 5.16. Interconnectedness of Sites 149 Table 8.1. Perceived Natural Impacts to Rock Art Panels 232 Table 8.2. Perceived Human Impacts to Rock Art Panels 235 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1.
Recommended publications
  • People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: a Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 2012 People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada Douglas Deur Portland State University, [email protected] Deborah Confer University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Deur, Douglas and Confer, Deborah, "People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada" (2012). Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations. 98. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/98 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Pacific West Region: Social Science Series National Park Service Publication Number 2012-01 U.S. Department of the Interior PEOPLE OF SNOWY MOUNTAIN, PEOPLE OF THE RIVER: A MULTI-AGENCY ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW AND COMPENDIUM RELATING TO TRIBES ASSOCIATED WITH CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 2012 Douglas Deur, Ph.D. and Deborah Confer LAKE MEAD AND BLACK CANYON Doc Searls Photo, Courtesy Wikimedia Commons
    [Show full text]
  • History of Nuwuvi People
    History of Nuwuvi People The Nuwuvi, or Southern Paiute peoples (the people), are also known as Nuwu. The Southern Paiute language originates from the uto-aztecan family of languages. Many different dialects are spoken, but there are many similarities between each language. UNLV, and the wider Las Vegas area, stands on Southern Paiute land. Historically, Southern Paiutes were hunter-gatherers and lived in small family units. Prior to colonial influence, their territory spanned across what is today Southeastern California, Southern Nevada, Northern Arizona, and Southern Utah. Within this territory, many of the Paiutes would roam the land moving from place to place. Often there was never really a significant homebase. The Las Vegas Paiute Tribe (LVPT) mentions that, “Outsiders who came to the Paiutes' territory often described the land as harsh, arid and barren; however, the Paiutes developed a culture suited to the diverse land and its resources.” Throughout the history of the Southern Paiute people, there was often peace and calm times. Other than occasional conflicts with nearby tribes, the Southern Paiutes now had to endure conflict from White settlers in the 1800s. Their way of life was now changed with the onset of construction for the Transcontinental railroad and its completion. Among other changes to the land, the LVPT also said, “In 1826, trappers and traders began crossing Paiute land, and these crossings became known in 1829 as the Old Spanish Trail (a trade route from New Mexico to California). In 1848, the United States government assumed control over the area.” The local tribe within the area is the Las Vegas Paiute Tribe (LVPT), their ancestors were known as the Tudinu (Desert People).
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon National Park U.S
    National Park Service Grand Canyon National Park U.S. Department of the Interior The official newspaper North Rim 2015 Season The Guide North Rim Information and Maps Roosevelt Point, named for President Theodore Roosevelt who in 1908, declared Grand Canyon a national monument. Grand Canyon was later established as a national park in 1919 by President Woodrow Wilson. Welcome to Grand Canyon S ITTING ATOP THE K AIBAB a meadow, a mother turkey leading her thunderstorms, comes and goes all too flies from the South Rim, the North Plateau, 8,000 to 9,000 feet (2,400– young across the road, or a mountain quickly, only to give way to the colors Rim offers a very different visitor 2,750 m) above sea level with lush lion slinking off into the cover of the of fall. With the yellows and oranges of experience. Solitude, awe-inspiring green meadows surrounded by a mixed forest. Visitors in the spring may see quaking aspen and the reds of Rocky views, a slower pace, and the feeling of conifer forest sprinkled with white- remnants of winter in disappearing Mountain maple, the forest seems to going back in time are only a few of the barked aspen, the North Rim is an oasis snowdrifts or temporary mountain glow. Crispness in the air warns of winter many attributes the North Rim has in the desert. Here you may observe lakes of melted snow. The summer, snowstorms soon to come. Although to offer. Discover the uniqueness of deer feeding, a coyote chasing mice in with colorful wildflowers and intense only 10 miles (16 km) as the raven Grand Canyon’s North Rim.
    [Show full text]
  • Visitor Guide &
    Visitor Guide & Map WELCOME TO THE HEARD MUSEUM Your visit to the Heard Museum includes 12 exhibition galleries, free self-guided audio tours, outdoor sculpture gardens, a renowned café, a contemporary art gallery and trading-post style shopping, plus much more. MUSEUM & SHOP HOURS The Heard Museum is fully wheelchair accessible and 3RD PARTY ADVERTISING Tuesday to Sunday, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. wheelchairs are available Closed Monday upon request. Doors open to members at 9:00 a.m. on Saturday and Sunday Assisted Listening System, video & audio transcripts Closed Easter Sunday, Independence Day, are all available to be Thanksgiving and Christmas. checked out at Admissions. Food & drink are not MUSEUM APP permitted in the galleries. Download the new Heard Museum mobile app. Features include museum maps, Photography is permitted without flash unless audio guides, exhibition information and otherwise posted. more! Available in the App Store & Google All backpacks and any bag Play, or scan this code with your phone's over 13” x 17” are not camera: permitted in the museum. Free lockers are available to store any items during your visit. No firearms or weapons are allowed on this property. cover: Leon Polk Smith, 1906-1996, Pursuant to A.R.S. § 4-229 Reflections-Red-Black, detail,1971. Acrylic on canvas, Overall: 35 1/2 x 35 1/2 in., Leon Polk Smith Foundation. Copyright for many works of art in the museum rests with the artists. The Heard Museum does not assume liability for violation of copyright law by a photographer (Title 17, United States Code).
    [Show full text]
  • ARIZONA INDIAN GAMING ASSOCIATION • ANNUAL REPORT FY 2006 Letter from the Chairwoman
    ARIZONA INDIAN GAMING ASSOCIATION • ANNUAL REPORT FY 2006 Letter From The Chairwoman It is our pleasure to present the third Annual Report for the Arizona Indian Gaming Association (AIGA). This report celebrates the contributions that gaming tribes are making for all Arizonans. Native people have a tradition of sharing with the community, whether we are sharing our knowledge and wisdom, artistic heritage or our natural or manmade resources. This tradition of cooperation and sharing is common to all tribes and is part of our culture. In Arizona, for example, in the 1800s, when the Pima people saw the needs of the military and settlers, they willingly shared their water and food with them. Sharing is a tradition that repeats throughout our history. With the passage of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and the subsequent agree- ments reached with the state of Arizona for tribes to establish and continue gaming on their lands, we are now sharing the benefits from our successful enterprises with our own people and with others throughout our state. The magnitude of sharing represents a remarkable change in a very short time frame. Twenty-five years ago, no one could have imagined that Arizona tribes, always the poorest of the poor, would be contributing millions of dollars every year to support education, health care, conservation and tourism to the state of Arizona. Or 1 that hundreds of charities would be helped every year by generous grants and donations from individual tribes. While this report is a celebration of sharing, it is also a call to action.
    [Show full text]
  • 26064 001 Cover Page.Indd
    UNIT I THE O'ODHAM O'ODHAM VILLAGE LIFE 11 Students will participate in simulated O'odham cultural activities to include an O’odham language lesson and role-playing various daily tasks such as food preparation, games, weaving and pot making. PAGE 1.7 CREATE AN O'ODHAM VILLAGE 22 Students will place a fictional O'odham village along a Santa Cruz River map while using their knowledge of cultural needs and climate restrictions. They will describe the advantages of their chosen site and draw a sketch of their village. PAGE 1.17 UNIT I - ARIZONA STATE STANDARDS - 2006 Lesson 1 - The O'odham SUBJECT STANDARD DESCRIPTION S1 C2 PO1 describe cultures of prehistoric people in the Americas S1 C2 PO2 describe cultures of Mogollon, Anasazi, Hohokam SOCIAL S1 C3 PO3 describe the location and cultural characteristics of Native STUDIES Americans S4 C5 PO1 describe human dependence on environment and resources to satisfy basic needs S1 C4 PO2 use context to determine word meaning S1 C4 PO3 determine the difference between figurative and literal language S1 C6 PO1 predict text content READING S1 C6 PO2 confirm predictions about text S2 C1 PO1 identify the conflict of a plot S2 C1 PO5 describe a character's traits S1 C1 PO1 generate ideas WRITING S1 C1 PO5 maintain record of ideas MATH S4 C1 PO2 identify a tessellation (mat weaving) SCIENCE S4 C3 PO1 describe how resources are used to meet population needs Lesson 2 - Create an O'odham Village SUBJECT STANDARD DESCRIPTION S1 C2 PO1 describe the cultures of prehistoric people in the Americas S1 C2 PO2 describe
    [Show full text]
  • North Kaibab Ranger District Travel Management Project Environmental Assessment
    Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture North Kaibab Ranger District Forest Service Travel Management Project Southwestern Region September 2012 Kaibab National Forest Coconino and Mohave Counties, Arizona Information Contact: Wade Christy / Recreation & Lands Kaibab National Forest - NKRD Mail: P.O.Box 248 / 430 S. Main St. Fredonia, AZ 86022 Phone: 928-643-8135 E-mail: [email protected] It is the mission of the USDA Forest Service to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the Nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper – September
    [Show full text]
  • 4310-32-P Department of The
    4310-32-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and Opportunity for Public Meeting; Arizona AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Interior proposes to withdraw approximately 633,547 acres of public lands and 360,002 acres of National Forest System lands for up to 20 years from location and entry under the Mining Law of 1872, 30 U.S.C. §§ 22 et seq., on behalf of the Bureau of Land Management and the United States Forest Service. The purpose of the withdrawal, if determined to be appropriate, would be to protect the Grand Canyon watershed from adverse effects of locatable hardrock mineral exploration and mining. This notice segregates the lands from location and entry under the 1872 Mining Law for up to 2 years to allow time for various studies and analyses, including appropriate National Environmental Policy Act analysis. These actions will support a final decision on whether or not to proceed with a withdrawal. The lands will remain open to the mineral leasing, geothermal leasing, mineral materials, and public land laws. DATES: Comments and requests for a public meeting must be received by (insert date 90 days after date of publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER). ADDRESSES: Comments and meeting requests should be sent to the District Manager, Bureau of Land Management, Arizona Strip District Office, 345 East Riverside Drive, St. George, Utah 84790-9000, or Forest Supervisor, Forest Service, Kaibab National Forest, 800 South Sixth St., Williams, Arizona 86046. 2 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Florence, District Manager, BLM Arizona Strip District, 435-688-3200, or Michael Williams, Forest Supervisor, Kaibab National Forest, 928-635-8200.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet and Health Among Native American Peoples
    DIET AND HEALTH AMONG NATIVE AMERICAN PEOPLES: USING THE PAST TO COMBAT THE PRESENT THREAT OF TYPE II DIABETES Submitted to the Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors with Distinction by Chelsea Robertson Miami University Oxford, Ohio May 2009 Abstract Type II diabetes is a significant problem among many Native American communities. Incorporating elements of prehistoric diets, said to be much lower in fats and sugars than the ubiquitous processed foods of contemporary times, holds some promise in mitigating indigenous peoples’ predisposition to the condition. These diets were usually much more varied and plant-based than those of today, and first-hand collection and processing of foods expended more energy than a trip to the grocery store. A look at prehistoric health also reveals that agriculture was, like the industrial production of food is today, a significant event for human health, making food more accessible but less healthy. Diabetes is high in Native Americans for genetic, cultural, and socio-economic reasons; it originated in abrupt and often forced transitions to processed low-cost foods. The Indian Health Service, the health organization that serves many American Indians and Alaska Natives, is increasingly addressing diabetes, but its power is limited by funding shortages and cultural differences between the biomedical realm it inhabits and Native American cultures. Community organization and grassroots programs, as well as increased tribal control over health facilities, may make diabetes treatment and prevention programs more effective. Native American efforts to curb the diabetes epidemic may also provide models for other groups facing rising diabetes rates, mostly in supporting the tailoring of programs and diabetes education to people with specific histories and identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Akimel O'odham
    Akimel O’odham - Pee Posh OUR COMMUNITY OUR FUTURE Governor Lieutenant Governor William Rhodes Jennifer Allison-Ray ANew Direction CONTENTS www.gric.nsn.us | FALL 2007 4 Community Profi le 13 Tribal Government + Executive Offi ce 5 History + Legislative Offi ce + Judicial Offi ce + Pre-History + Early Contact 16 Community Portfolio + 19th and 20th Centuries 9 Water Settlement 17 Tribal Enterprises 10 Tribal Culture 23 Tribal Community 27 Tribal Districts View of Sacaton Mountains from Olberg Gila River farms - District 2, Blackwater Bridge District 2 A MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR We welcome you to experience the rug- ged, awe-inspiring vistas of the South- west and the rich heritage of the Akimel O’odham (Pima) and Pee-Posh (Mari- copa). Historically, the strength of our culture has been the community spirit, industriousness, and maintaining our traditions and languages. Today, we con- tinue to face the challenge of preserving these core values while also meeting the demands of a rapidly changing world. Throughout Gila River’s history, our tribe has made innumerable contribu- tions and will continue to play an inte- gral role in the decades ahead. Governor William R. Rhodes 5 COMMUNITYFACTSHEET COMMUNITY PROFILE The Gila River Indian Community is located on 372,000 acres in south-central Arizona, south of Phoenix, Tempe, and Chandler. The reservation was established by an act of Congress in 1859. The Tribal administrative offi ces and departments are located in Sacaton, and serve residents throughout the seven community districts. The Gila River casinos are both owned and managed by the Gila River Indian Com- munity.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Number 03-07-20-09 the Restricted Area Consists of All
    Order Number 03-07-20-09 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE KAIBAB NATIONAL FOREST NORTH KAIBAB RANGER DISTRICT TEMPORARY AREA CLOSURE DUE TO THE MANGUM FIRE (For Public Safety) PROHIBITIONS Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 551 and 36 C.F.R. § 261.50(a), the following acts are prohibited within the area described in this Order (the “Restricted Area”), and as depicted on the attached map, hereby incorporated into this order as Exhibit A, all within the within the boundaries of the North Kaibab Ranger District of the Kaibab National Forest, Coconino County, Arizona (AZ): 1. Going into or being upon the Restricted Area. 36 C.F.R. § 261.53(e) EXEMPTIONS Pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 261.50(e), the following persons are exempt from this Order: 1. Persons with a written Forest Service authorization specifically exempting them from the effect of this Order. 2. Any Federal, State, or local officer or administrative personnel, or member of an organized rescue or fire fighting force in the performance of an official duty. RESTRICTED AREA The Restricted Area consists of all National Forest System lands within the boundary beginning at the Kaibab National Forest, North Kaibab Ranger District’s eastern boundary and Highway (HWY) 89A, near milepost 566, between Sections 34 and 35 in Township 39 N Range 3 E, and follows the forest boundary north and west for approximately 25 miles, then south and west for approximately six miles to where the forest boundary intersects with HWY 89A between mileposts 593 and 594, then crossing HWY 89A and following
    [Show full text]
  • Thunder River Trail and Deer Creek
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Grand Canyon Grand Canyon National Park Arizona Thunder River Trail and Deer Creek The huge outpourings of water at Thunder River, Tapeats Spring, and Deer Spring have attracted people since prehistoric times and today this little corner of Grand Canyon is exceedingly popular among seekers of the remarkable. Like a gift, booming streams of crystalline water emerge from mysterious caves to transform the harsh desert of the inner canyon into absurdly beautiful green oasis replete with the music of falling water and cool pools. Trailhead access can be difficult, sometimes impossible, and the approach march is long, hot and dry, but for those making the journey these destinations represent something close to canyon perfection. Locations/Elevations Mileages Indian Hollow (6250 ft / 1906 m) to Bill Hall Trail Junction (5400 ft / 1647 m): 5.0 mi (8.0 km) Monument Point (7200 ft / 2196 m) to Bill Hall Junction: 2.6 mi (4.2 km) Bill Hall Junction, AY9 (5400 ft / 1647 m) to Surprise Valley Junction, AM9 (3600 ft / 1098 m): 4.5 mi ( 7.2 km) Upper Tapeats Camp, AW7 (2400 ft / 732 m): 6.6 mi ( 10.6 km) Lower Tapeats, AW8 at Colorado River (1950 ft / 595 m): 8.8 mi ( 14.2 km) Deer Creek Campsite, AX7 (2200 ft / 671 m): 6.9 mi ( 11.1 km) Deer Creek Falls and Colorado River (1950 ft / 595 m): 7.6 mi ( 12.2 km) Maps 7.5 Minute Tapeats Amphitheater and Fishtail Mesa Quads (USGS) Trails Illustrated Map, Grand Canyon National Park (National Geographic) North Kaibab Map, Kaibab National Forest (good for roads) Water Sources Thunder River, Tapeats Creek, Deer Creek, and the Colorado River are permanent water sources.
    [Show full text]