High Priority Notifications Works to Be Completed Between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2015 Canal/Reservoir Location Description De
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Waterway Dimensions
Generated by waterscape.com Dimension Data The data published in this documentis British Waterways’ estimate of the dimensions of our waterways based upon local knowledge and expertise. Whilst British Waterways anticipates that this data is reasonably accurate, we cannot guarantee its precision. Therefore, this data should only be used as a helpful guide and you should always use your own judgement taking into account local circumstances at any particular time. Aire & Calder Navigation Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Bulholme Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 6.3m 2.74m - - 20.67ft 8.99ft - Castleford Lock is limiting due to the curvature of the lock chamber. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Castleford Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom 61m - - - 200.13ft - - - Heck Road Bridge is now lower than Stubbs Bridge (investigations underway), which was previously limiting. A height of 3.6m at Heck should be seen as maximum at the crown during normal water level. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Heck Road Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.71m - - - 12.17ft - 1 - Generated by waterscape.com Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Leeds Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.5m 2.68m - - 18.04ft 8.79ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m. Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Crown Point Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.62m - - - 11.88ft Crown Point Bridge at summer levels Wakefield Branch - Broadreach Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.55m 2.7m - - 18.21ft 8.86ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m. -
Selby Canal Guide
PDF download Boaters' Guides - beta version Welcome Thank you Key to facilities Welcome to the beta version of This is the first time this information has been Winding hole (length specified) Waterscape.com's Boaters' Guides. collected nationally, and the technology we are These new guides list facilities across the using to ensure up-to-date information breaks Winding hole (full length) waterway network. This first release of the a lot of new ground. We do expect there will be some omissions, and would very much like to guides covers the facilities provided by British Visitor mooring Waterways on its navigations in England and hear from you. Wales. Information and office The guides are completely computer-generated. All the information is held Dock and/or slipway in a central database. Whenever you download a guide from Waterscape.com, it will Slipway only take the very latest information and compile a 'fresh' PDF for you. Services and facilities The same information is used in the maps on Waterscape.com itself, to ensure consistency. Water point only It will be regularly updated by local staff whenever details change. We would like to hear your comments and corrections on the information contained within. Please send your feedback to [email protected]. About the maps The maps are automatically generated by computer. The only human involvement is to set the bounds of each map. We are continuing to teach the computer how best to draw the maps, and will be making further improvements in the months ahead. If you would like to comment on the maps or any other aspect of the presentation, please contact [email protected]. -
British Waterways Board General Canal Bye-Laws
BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD GENERAL CANAL BYE-LAWS 1965 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD BYE-LAWS ____________________ for regulation of the canals belonging to or under the control of the British Waterways Board (other than the canals specified in Bye-law 1) made pursuant to the powers of the British Transport Commission Act, 1954. (N.B. – The sub-headings and marginal notes do not form part of these Bye-laws). Application of Bye-laws Application of 1. These Bye-laws shall apply to every canal or inland navigation in Bye-Laws England and Wales belonging to or under the control of the British Waterways Board except the following canals: - (a) The Lee and Stort Navigation (b) the Gloucester and Sharpness Canal (c) the River Severn Navigation which are more particularly defined in the Schedule hereto. Provided that where the provisions of any of these Bye-laws are limited by such Bye-law to any particular canal or locality then such Bye-law shall apply only to such canal or locality to which it is so limited. These Bye-laws shall come into operation at the expiration of twenty-eight days after their confirmation by the Minister of Transport as from which date all existing Bye-laws applicable to the canals and inland navigations to which these Bye-laws apply (other than those made under the Explosives Act 1875, and the Petroleum (Consolidation) Act 1928) shall cease to have effect, without prejudice to the validity of anything done thereunder or to any liability incurred in respect of any act or omission before the date of coming into operation of these Bye-laws. -
Selby Canalside Park
AINA CASE STUDY PLACE MAKING AND SHAPING Selby canalside park Environmental improvements to benefit all waterway users The broad 20 kilometre Selby Canal in North Yorkshire links the River Ouse with the Aire and Calder Navigation. A programme of improvements was carried out to encourage better links between the canal and the historic town centre. These were initially identified in a detailed canal corridor study. Proposals were developed to create a linear canalside park, approximately one kilometre in length, linking with pedestrian routes to the town centre and the regenerated Ouse waterfront. The scheme included improved towpath surfacing, significant landscape work, better access and signage, seating and public art, car parking and new provision for anglers. Issues to be addressed included measures to reduce user conflict, access for all, refurbishment of an original swing bridge, liaison with neighbouring industrial premises and positive involvement of local people and schoolchildren. Local schools were invited to contribute ideas for a sculpture to celebrate the history of the canal, and a mosaic was also developed with their input. Adjoining businesses were asked to consider the ways in which their towpath boundaries could be improved and, where possible, funds were made available to assist. An innovative part of the work included the development of a dedicated off-side walkway which caters for anglers without potential conflicts from other users. This also included a series of timber platforms specially built to cater for disabled anglers. Car parking for anglers was also provided. Towpath surfacing was a combination of limestone with dust and spray and chip, with timber boards or stone setts used as edging. -
Recommendations on Harmonized Europe-Wide Technical Requirements for Inland Navigation Vessels
ECE/TRANS/SC.3/172/Amend.1 ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Working Party on Inland Water Transport RECOMMENDATIONS ON HARMONIZED EUROPE-WIDE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR INLAND NAVIGATION VESSELS Amendment 1 UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2008 GE.08-23368 ECE/TRANS/SC.3/172/Amend.1 page 2 Amendments to resolution No. 61 on Recommendations on Harmonized Europe-wide Technical Requirements for Inland Navigation Vessels Resolution No. 64 (adopted by the Working Party on Inland Water Transport on 19 October 2008) The Working Party on Inland Water Transport, Considering resolution No. 61 of the Working Party on Inland Water Transport on Recommendations on Harmonized Europe-wide Technical Requirements for Inland Navigation Vessels (ECE/TRANS/SC.3/172), Bearing in mind the report of the Working Party on the Standardization of Technical and Safety Requirements in Inland Navigation on its thirty-first session (ECE/TRANS/SC.3/WP.3/62, par. 20), Noting the desirability in the interest of safety in navigation of harmonizing the division of inland waterways into navigable zones, Decides to amend the text of Resolution No.61 by the text contained in the annex to this resolution, Requests Governments and River Commissions to inform the Executive Secretary of the Economic Commission for Europe whether they accept this resolution, Requests the Executive Secretary of the Economic Commission for Europe to place the question of the application of this resolution periodically on the agenda of the Working Party on Inland Water Transport. ECE/TRANS/SC.3/172/Amend.1 page 3 Annex Annex Appendix 1 1. -
Part 1 Rea Ch Classifica Tion
RIVER QUALITY SURVEY NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY NORTHUMBRIA & YORKSHIRE REGION GQA ASSESSMENT 1994 PART 1 REA CH CLASSIFICA TION FRESHWATER RIVERS AND CANALS VERSION 1: AUGUST 1995 GQA ASSESSMENT 1994 \ NORTHUMBRIA & YORKSHIRE REGION To allow the development of a National method of evaluating water quality, the rivers in all the NRA regions of England and Wales have been divided into reaches, which are numbered using a coding system based on the hydrological reference for each river basin. Each classified reach then has a chemistry sample point assigned to it and these sample points are regularly monitored for Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Dissolved oxygen (DO) and Total Ammonia. The summary statistics calculated from the results of this sampling are sent to a National Centre where the GQA Grades are calculated. A National report is produced and each region can then produce more detailed reports on the quality of their own rivers. For Northumbria and Yorkshire Region, this Regional Report has been divided into two parts. PARTI: REACH CLASSIFICATION This report contains a listing of the river reaches within the region, with their start and finish grid reference, approximate length, and the 1990 and 1994 GQA class for each reach. The reference code of the chemistry sample point used to classify the reach is also included. A sample point may classify several reaches if there are no major discharges or tributaries dividing those reaches. The sample point used to classify a reach may change and the classification is therefore calculated using the summary statistics for each sample point that has been used over the past three years. -
South Yorkshire
INDUSTRIAL HISTORY of SOUTH RKSHI E Association for Industrial Archaeology CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 6 STEEL 26 10 TEXTILE 2 FARMING, FOOD AND The cementation process 26 Wool 53 DRINK, WOODLANDS Crucible steel 27 Cotton 54 Land drainage 4 Wire 29 Linen weaving 54 Farm Engine houses 4 The 19thC steel revolution 31 Artificial fibres 55 Corn milling 5 Alloy steels 32 Clothing 55 Water Corn Mills 5 Forging and rolling 33 11 OTHER MANUFACTUR- Windmills 6 Magnets 34 ING INDUSTRIES Steam corn mills 6 Don Valley & Sheffield maps 35 Chemicals 56 Other foods 6 South Yorkshire map 36-7 Upholstery 57 Maltings 7 7 ENGINEERING AND Tanning 57 Breweries 7 VEHICLES 38 Paper 57 Snuff 8 Engineering 38 Printing 58 Woodlands and timber 8 Ships and boats 40 12 GAS, ELECTRICITY, 3 COAL 9 Railway vehicles 40 SEWERAGE Coal settlements 14 Road vehicles 41 Gas 59 4 OTHER MINERALS AND 8 CUTLERY AND Electricity 59 MINERAL PRODUCTS 15 SILVERWARE 42 Water 60 Lime 15 Cutlery 42 Sewerage 61 Ruddle 16 Hand forges 42 13 TRANSPORT Bricks 16 Water power 43 Roads 62 Fireclay 16 Workshops 44 Canals 64 Pottery 17 Silverware 45 Tramroads 65 Glass 17 Other products 48 Railways 66 5 IRON 19 Handles and scales 48 Town Trams 68 Iron mining 19 9 EDGE TOOLS Other road transport 68 Foundries 22 Agricultural tools 49 14 MUSEUMS 69 Wrought iron and water power 23 Other Edge Tools and Files 50 Index 70 Further reading 71 USING THIS BOOK South Yorkshire has a long history of industry including water power, iron, steel, engineering, coal, textiles, and glass. -
Boaters' Guides
PDF download Boaters' Guides Welcome Dimension data Key to facilities Welcome to waterscape.com's Boaters' British Waterways' waterway dimension Winding hole (length specified) Guides. data is currently being updated. The These guides list facilities across the waterway following information is for general Winding hole (full length) network. This first release of the guides covers guidance purposes. Queries should be directed to BW's customer service centre the facilities provided by British Waterways on Visitor mooring its navigations in England and Wales. on 0845 671 5530 or email [email protected] The guides are completely Information and office computer-generated. All the information is held in a central database. Whenever you Dock and/or slipway download a guide from waterscape.com, it will take the very latest information and compile a Slipway only 'fresh' PDF for you. The same information is used in the maps on Services and facilities waterscape.com itself, to ensure consistency. It will be regularly updated by local staff Water point only whenever details change. We would like to hear your comments and corrections on the information contained within. Please send your feedback to [email protected]. Downloaded from waterscape.com on 06 May 2010 1 River Ure, Ripon Canal Dishforth 1 Cundall Max 57ft Copt Hewick 2 Rhodesfield Lock Bell Furrows Lock Nicholsons Bridge Ripon Brafferton Rentons Bridge 3 Oxclose Lock 4 Start of Ripon Canal Westwick Lock Milby Lock Bishop Monkton Boroughbridge Myton on Swale Myton Monkton Roecliffe Aldborough Aldwark Marton le Moor Stainley Burton Leonard Aldlwark South Stainley Copgrove Marton Ouseburn Nidd Staveley Great Ouseburn Ouse Gill Beck Ferrensby Little Ouseburn Navigation notes Visitor moorings Ripon Canal Ripon Canal Length 57ft (17.3m). -
Canal Restrictions by Boat Size
Aire & Calder Navigation The main line is 34.0 miles (54.4 km) long and has 11 locks. The Wakefield Branch is 7.5 miles (12 km) long and has 4 locks. The navigable river Aire to Haddlesey is 6.5 miles (10.4 km) long and has 2 locks. The maximum boat size that can navigate the full main line is length: 200' 2" (61.0 metres) - Castleford Lock beam: 18' 1" (5.5 metres) - Leeds Lock height: 11' 10" (3.6 metres) - Heck Road Bridge draught: 8' 9" (2.68 metres) - cill of Leeds Lock The maximum boat size that can navigate the Wakefield Branch is length: 141' 0" (42.9 metres) beam: 18' 3" (5.55 metres) - Broadreach Lock height: 11' 10" (3.6 metres) draught: 8' 10" (2.7 metres) - cill of Broadreach Lock Ashby Canal The maximum size of boat that can navigate the Ashby Canal is length: There are no locks to limit length beam: 8' 2" (2.49 metres) - Safety Gate near Marston Junction height: 8' 8" (2.64 metres) - Bridge 15a draught: 4' 7" (1.39 metres) Ashton Canal The maximum boat length that can navigate the Ashton Canal is length: 74' 0" (22.5 metres) - Lock 2 beam: 7' 3" (2.2 metres) - Lock 4 height: 6' 5" (1.95 metres) - Bridge 21 (Lumb Lane) draught: 3' 7" (1.1 metres) - cill of Lock 9 Avon Navigation The maximum size of boat that navigate throughout the Avon Navigation is length: 70' (21.3 metres) beam: 12' 6" (3.8 metres) height: 10' (3.0 metres) draught: 4' 0" (1.2 metres) - reduces to 3' 0" or less towards Alveston Weir Basingstoke Canal The maximum size of boat that can navigate the Basingstoke Canal is length: 72' (21.9 metres) beam: 13' -
Pocklington Canal Amenity Society Double Nine
DOUBLE NINE POCKLINGTON CANAL AMENITY SOCIETY Summer 2013 No. 101 Pocklington Canal Balsam Bash On Saturday 29th of June a party of 9 willing volunteers gathered at the CRT car park in Melbourne to attack an outbreak of Himalayan Balsam. This was a joint effort by the IWA East Yorkshire Branch and the Pocklington Canal Amenity Society (PCAS), supervised by two of the local CRT team from Leeds. It was also gratifying to see that a member of the public had also decided to give a hand having seen notice of the event on the IWA web site. Behind the moorings at Melbourne is an extensive area designated as a wildlife reserve and the balsam was showing itself in a number of places, usually mixed in among the nettles as a number of us found to our cost! A substantial amount was found and fortunately the problem was tackled before the plants had flowered and set seed pods so that there is every hope that any spread can be halted, especially if the treatment is repeated next year. After welcome refreshments taken on board the PCAS trip boat New Horizons, the party moved to another site at Coates Bridge, further along the canal, where a small concentrated outbreak had been discov- ered near to the offside bridge abutment. This was a much less accessible area and warranted the wearing of lifejackets while working on the steep embankment close to the canal side. All in all a worthwhile day out among pleasant company, and there is every hope that a potential problem has been nipped in the bud by the efforts of willing volunteers. -
Waterways Breeding Bird Survey: Progress Report for 2000–01
BTO Research Report 292 Waterways Breeding Bird Survey: progress report for 2000–01 John H Marchant, David G Noble & L Peter Beaven A report to the Environment Agency June 2002 BTO, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU Registered Charity No. 216652 Citation: Marchant, J.H., D.G. Noble & L.P. Beaven. 2002. Waterways Breeding Bird Survey: progress report for 2000–01. Research Report 292. British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford. © British Trust for Ornithology and the Environment Agency, 2002 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers. BTO Research Report 292 June 2002 CONTENTS List of tables and figures............................................................................................................4 Executive summary....................................................................................................................5 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................7 1.1 The Waterways Bird Survey (WBS)..................................................................7 1.2 WBBS development in Phases 1 and 2..............................................................7 1.3 The scope of this report .....................................................................................8 2 Methods .........................................................................................................................9 -
Leeds Bridge
Whitehall Road Power Station Riders boatyard, with the railway station behind. Leeds Bridge It was suggested that the Steam tugs towed boats up river up to Armley could be It was and down the river between used by boats in the 1820s, the canal and the navigation and a connection was made until the 1930s. There is when the railway was built, no towpath on the river in creating the Dark Arches Leeds, and without the tugs - and free covered goods boats had to sail down on storage for the canal. The the current or be pushed lock into the river, below, upwards by the use of long survived until the 1970s, wooden shafts. Although hard though not in use by then. work, some boatmen always shafted their boats upstream Arches Lock under as it saved having to pay for the railway station. a tug. The new basin before redevelopment. The route of the proposed Leeds & Selby Canal was well to the south of the town centre. Hol Beck may have been suggested as a way of connecting the Leeds & Liverpool Canal to the Aire & Calder Navigation, but instead the canal basin was built, providing a centre on the canal in Leeds for handling cargoes. Leeds Lock, on the Aire & Calder Navigation, has been Note the number of water mills close to the town centre. extended over the years. The now-disused lock to the The closure of the mill races has created a bottleneck right of the house was built in the 1770s, and is the same for flood water, and flooding happened quite often.