DOCSLIB.ORG

AA-765 Bridge 2081, Weems Creek Bridge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AA-765 Bridge 2081, Weems Creek Bridge Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 06-11-2004 INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY/DISTRICT MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST INTERNAL NR-ELIGIBILITY REVIEW FORM Property /District Name: Bri dqe 2081 Survey Number: ....A-"-A-'---:..-7=65"==== Project: MD 436 over Weems Creek. Annaoolis MD Agency: SHA/FHWA Site visit by MHT Staff: _X_ no =yes Name========= Date====== Eligibility recommended ~X- Eligibility not recommended== Criteria: _X_A =B _x_c =D Considerations: A =B =c =D =E =F =G =None Justification for decision: CUse continuation sheet if necessary and attach map) Bridge No. 2081 is eligible for the National Register under Criteria A and C for ~Transportation and Engineering. Bridge No. 2081 is significant under Transportation as an xample of a movable bridge. Movable bridges have played an important part in the development of transportation in the United States and were once common features in areas with navigable waterways. Movable bridges are a rapidly disappearing bridge type. Of the more than 1,500 movable bridges constructed in Maryland, only twenty three remain. Of these, five are modern structures, built within the last thirty two years. Bridge No. 2081 is significant under Engineering as a rare example of a swing type bridge. Swing bridges were constructed in fewer numbers than bascule bridges in Maryland and are particularly rare today. Bridge No. 2081 is a center-bearing swing bridge composed of thirteen 20-foot steel girder spans and two 48-foot pony steel truss swing spans. It is one of three remaining swing bridges in Maryland and is the ordest of the three. The other two remaining swing bridges were constructed in 1950 and 1932 and are located on the Eastern Shore and in Southern Maryland. Swing bridges were the most commonly constructed movable bridge type in Maryland through the early twentieth century, with the bascule bridge becoming more popular in later years. As a movable bridge, designed to accommodate both vehicular and water-borne traffic, Bridge No. 2081 is emblematic of Anne Arundel County's maritime heritage. Documentation on the property/district is presented in: oroject file. SHA history of movable bridges. inventory form AA-765 Prepared by: Rita Suffness John Hnedak -- Elizabeth Hannold Reviewer, Office of Preservation Services Date NR progra'Rn~:~~J/;:-~: no ~ not applicable<--/~ c//-j/ "; __ Reviewer. NR program Date Survey No. ='-AA""'-'--'-7'--"6=5===== MARYLAND COMPREHENSIVE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN DATA - HISTORIC CONTEXT I. Geographic Region: Eastern Shore (all Eastern Shore counties, and Cecil) ~x~ Western Shore (Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, Prince George's and St. Mary's) Piedmont (Baltimore City, Baltimore, Carroll, Frederick. Harford, Howard, Montgomery) ~Western Maryland (Allegany, Garrett and Washington) II. Chronological/Developmental Periods: Paleo-Indian 10000-7500 B.C. _ Early Archaic 7500-6000 B.C. -- Middle Archaic 6000-4000 B.C. _ Late Archaic 4000-2000 B.C. ==== Early Woodland 2000-500 B.C. -- Middle Woodland 500 B.C. - A.O. 900 Late Woodland/Archaic A.D. 900-1600 ~ Contact and Settlement A.D. 1570-1750 _ Rural Agrarian Intensification A.D. 1680-1815 ====Agricultural-Industrial Transition A.O. 1815-1870 -x- Industrial/Urban Dominance A.D. 1870-1930 ~ Modern Period A.D. 1930-Present Unknown Period ( === prehistoric historic) III. Prehistoric Period Themes: IV. Historic Period Themes: Subsistence __ Agriculture Settlement X Architecture. Landscape Architecture, ~ ~ and Community Planning Political Economic (Commercial and Industrial) _ Demographic Government/Law ==== Religion _Military ==== Technology ====Religion -- Environmental Adaption ====Social/Educational/Cultural X Transportation V. Resource Type: Category: Structure Historic Environment: villa e =-'-'~~~====================================~ Hi sto r i c Function Cs) and Use Cs) : -=tr'""""a'-'-'n=lsp"""o'"'"-r"""'ta"'"'t"""'"i"""'on'-'========================== Known Design Source: Unknown AA-765 1929 Weems Creek Bridge Annapolis vicinity public (unrestricted) This bridge carries Maryland Route 436 over Weems Creek in Annapolis, Maryland. It consists of 13 twenty-foot steel beam spans and a swing span of 96 feet in length. The swing portion is a camelback pony truss. As a moveable bridge, this structure is significant as a relatively rare kind of construct, designed to accommodate both vehicular and water-borne traffic. This bridge is one of three moveable bridges -- part of Maryland's state road system in Anne Arundel County, and one of 15 bridges of the same structural type throughout the state road network -­ identified by the Maryland Historical Trust for the Maryland Department of Transportation in a jointly conducted survey during 1980-81. AA-765 AA ·2081 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST ftl4(;I IF 02D1fti5.3~17 INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY dNAME HISTORIC ANO/OR COMMON Weems Creek Bridge fJLOCATION STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Annapolis ,.X. VICINITY OF 4th STATE COUNTY Maryland Anne Arundel DcLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT ~PUBLIC ~OCCUPIED _AGRICULTURE _MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) _PRIVATE _UNOCCUPIED _COMMERCIAL __ PARK XSTRUCTURE -BOTH _WORK IN PROGRESS _EDUCATIONAL _PRIVATE RESIDENCE _SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE _ENTERTAINMENT _RELIGIOUS --...._, -OBJECT _IN PROCESS -YES: RESTRICTED _GOVERNMENT _SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED ~YES: UNRESTRICTED _INDUSTRIAL X.TRANSPORTATION -NO _MILITARY _OTHER· JOWNER OF PROPERTY NAME State Highway Administration DOT Survey Telephone #: ~TREET & NUMBER 301 West Preston Street CITY, TOWN STATE , Zl.p code Baltimore _ VICINITY OF Maryland 21201 llLOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Liber #: COURTHOUSE. Folio #: REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETCAnne Arundel Co. Courthouse STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE Annapolis Maryland 21401 II REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SUR VEYS TITLE DATE _FEDERAL _STATE _COUNTY _LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY.TOWN STATE B DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE _EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED ~UNALTERED ~ORIGINAL SITE -XGOOD _RUINS -ALTERED _MOVED DATE. ____ _ FAIR _UNEXPOSED ~----~---=-::-::":'.'::"'."::-:::"-:='."'.:-=---:---:----------~---------------------0..,,-DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This structure, which carries Maryland Route 436 NW and SE over Weems Creek in Annapolis, consists of 13 twenty-foot steel beam spans and a swing span of 96'. The swing portion rs a camel­ back pony steel truss. The roadway is 23' wide. All truss con­ nections are riveted. CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY IISIGNIFICANCE PERIOD AREAS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- CHECK AND JUSTIFY BELOW ._PREHISTORIC -ARCHEOLOGY-PREHISTORIC _COMMUNITY PLANNING _LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE _RELIGION ll00-1499 -ARCHEOLOGY-HISTORIC _CONSERVATION _LAW -SCIENCE _1500-1599 -AGRICULTUR!; _ECONOMICS _LITERATURE _SCULPTURE -1600-1699 ......ARCHITECTURE _EDUCATION _MILITARY _$0CIAUHUMANITARIAN _1700-1799 -ART .XENGINEERING _MUSIC _THEATER _1800-1899 _COMMERCE _EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT _PHILOSOPHY ~TRANSPORTATION .X.1900- _COMMUNICATIONS _INDUSTRY _POLITICS/GOVERNMENT _QTHER (SPECIFY) _INVENTION ·\ SPECIFIC DATES 1929 BUILDER/ARCHITECT STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE (See M/DOT general bridge significance, attached, moveable bridges in particular). CONTINUE ON SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY IJMAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES Files of the Bureau of Bridge Design, State Highway Administration, 301 West Preston Street, Baltimore, Md. Condit, Carl, American Building Art, 20th Century; New York, Oxford University Press, 1961. CONTINUE ON SE~AMTE SHEET .If NECESSM~ IJiJGEOGRAPHICAL DATA ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY-------­ Quadrangle Name:South River Quadrangle Scale: 1:24 000 UTM References: 18. 369360. 4316860 VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION NA LIST ALL STATES AND COUNTIES FOR PROPERTIES OVERLAPPING STATE OR COUNTY BOUNDARIES STA TENA COUNTY STATE COUNTY IDFORM PREPARED BY NAME/TITLE John Hnedak/M/DOT Survey Manager ORGANIZATION DATE Maryland Historical Trust 1980 STREET & NUMBER 21 State Circle CITY OR TOWN STIm: Annapolis Maryland 21401 The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature, to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 Supplement. The Survey and Inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringe­ ment of individual property rights. RETURN TO: Maryland Historical Trust The Shaw House, 21 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (301) 267-1438 PS· I 108 MOVABLE SPAN BRIDGES
Recommended publications
  • Hidden Bridge Defect Investigation and Monitoring

    Hidden Bridge Defect Investigation and Monitoring

    Hidden bridge defect investigation and monitoring A definitive approach to managing hidden defects in bridges A part of James Fisher and Sons plc \ Hidden bridge defect investigation and monitoring Experts in hidden defect management The detection and management of hidden defects in bridges has BridgeWatch® – Setting the standard in structural health monitoring BridgeWatch® uses a highly sophisticated range of sensors, data acquisition equipment and Strainstall’s SAMTM software to provide become an area of increased focus across the infrastructure sector, constant, real-time monitoring in an integrated manner. following a number of high profile structural failures. The hardware system comprises: • A modular network of data acquisition units (DAUs) • Fully integrated systems including GPS, corrosion and weigh-in-motion Strainstall and Testconsult – Experts in hidden defect management • Sensors including; strain gauges, accelerometers, temperature, tilt and displacement transducers • Other data inputs, including inspector records New technologies and techniques make it possible to address Our BridgeWatch® system, based on our Smart Asset The sensors are distributed across areas of interest, resulting in an adaptive system that can be applied to any structure at any point in its defects, significantly increasing safety and increasing the Management (SAM)TM software, is one of the most advanced life cycle for one-off testing or continuous monitoring. lifespan of the asset. monitoring, analysis and data management systems available. TM It provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for a wide With the sophisticated SAM data analytics system, users can run multiple analysis routines, produce reports and generate health CIRIA, in conjunction with Strainstall and other industry range of structures, yielding data-rich insights into the indices for risk-based maintenance planning.
  • And Bridge Overloads

    And Bridge Overloads

    FINAL REPORT Development of Risk Models for Florida's Bridge Management System (Reuters) Contract No. BDK83 977-11 John O. Sobanjo Florida State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 2525 Pottsdamer St. Tallahassee, FL 32310 Paul D. Thompson Consultant 17035 NE 28th Place Bellevue, WA 98008 Prepared for: State Maintenance Office Florida Department of Transportation Tallahassee, FL 32309 June 2013 Final Report ii Disclaimer The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), or Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Final Report iii SI* (MODERN METRIC) CONVERSION FACTORS APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in Inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft Feet 0.305 meters m yd Yards 0.914 meters m mi Miles 1.61 kilometers km SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL AREA in2 Square inches 645.2 square millimeters mm2 ft2 Square feet 0.093 square meters m2 yd2 square yard 0.836 square meters m2 ac acres 0.405 hectares ha mi2 square miles 2.59 square kilometers km2 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms
  • Development of User Cost Model for Movable Bridge Openings in Florida Bernard Buxton-Tetteh

    Development of User Cost Model for Movable Bridge Openings in Florida Bernard Buxton-Tetteh

    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2004 Development of User Cost Model for Movable Bridge Openings in Florida Bernard Buxton-Tetteh Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT OF USER COST MODEL FOR MOVABLE BRIDGE OPENINGS IN FLORIDA By BERNARD BUXTON-TETTEH A Thesis submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2004 The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Bernard Buxton-Tetteh defended on March 26, 2004. _______________________________________ John O. Sobanjo Professor Directing Thesis _______________________________________ Renatus N. Mussa Committee Member ________________________________________ Lisa Spainhour Committee Member Approved: ___________________________________________________ Jerry Wekezer, Chair, Department of Civil Engineering The office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to God who provided me with strength and wisdom and by whose grace I have come this far in my educational career. I would like to thank Dr. John O. Sobanjo for his advice, instruction, and support and for giving me the privilege to work him in the pursuance of my Master’s degree. I would also like to thank Dr. Renatus Mussa and Dr. Lisa K. Spainhour for serving on my committee and for their guidance in the preparation of this report. I would like to thank my mother, Madam Victoria for her prayers and my brother Michael who has been a source of inspiration throughout my educational career.
  • Metallic Bridges Str403

    Metallic Bridges Str403

    METALLIC BRIDGES STR403 Sherif A. Mourad Professor of Steel Structures and Bridges Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University Lecture 1 – February 2020 Sherif A. Mourad 1 Introduction Course: STR403 Instructors: Prof. Sherif Ahmed Mourad. Prof. Mohammed Hassanein Soror. Lecture: Monday 8:30-10:00 or 10:15-11:45 Grading: 70% final 15% midterm 15% term work Sherif A. Mourad 2 STR403 - Metallic Bridges Winter 2020 1 Introduction Why a course in steel bridge design? Sherif A. Mourad 3 Lecture Outline • Definition of a bridge. • Historical background. • Bridge forms. • Classification of bridges (Structural system, Material of construction, Use, Position, Span, …). • Design considerations. • Course outline. Sherif A. Mourad 4 STR403 - Metallic Bridges Winter 2020 2 Definition of a Bridge A bridge is a structure that carries a service (which may be highway or railway traffic, a footpath, public utilities, etc.) over an obstacle (which may be another road or railway, a river, a valley, etc.), and then transfers the loads from the service via the superstructure through the bridge substructure to the foundation level. Sherif A. Mourad 5 Definition of a Bridge Sherif A. Mourad 6 STR403 - Metallic Bridges Winter 2020 3 Historical background The historical development of bridges best illustrates the progress of structural engineering from ancient times up to the present century. In particular the development in steel bridges equates with the progress in structural analysis, theory of strength of materials and materials testing, since all of them were increasingly stimulated by the need for bridging larger spans and building more economically with the new construction method. Sherif A. Mourad 7 Historical background The simplest type of a bridge is stepping stones, so this may have been one of the earliest types.
  • Historic Bridges in South Dakota, 1893-1943

    Historic Bridges in South Dakota, 1893-1943

    NEB Ram 10-900-b * QB ND. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES QC I & 0 133 MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM N&T1GH&L j This farm is fear use in documenting rtultiple property groups relating to cne or several historic ccnbexts. Se4 instrtcticns in Guidelines for OQndetinq Naticnal Register Etarrns (National Ragister Bulletin 161. CtrrpiLete each iten by marking "x" in the appccptriate box or hy entering the regjested infcaitHbkn. Rar additional space use cxxtiinuaticn sheets (Ram lO-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing___________________________________ Historic Bridges in South Dakota, 1893-1943 B. Associated Historic Contexts____________________________________ Historic Bridges in South Dakota, 1893-1943 C. Geographical Data The State of South Dakota DQg See continuation sheet_____________________________________________________________ D. Certification________________________________________________ As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. Signature o£ certifying official Date State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating E. Statement of Historic Contexts HISTORIC BRIDGES IN SOUTH DAKOTA, 1893-1942 THE FIRST SOUTH DAKOTA BRIDGES AND THEIR BUILDERS Prior to the early 19th century and the establishment of the European- American fur trade in South Dakota, the region's transportation network consisted of the trails and water routes of the Indians.
  • WI-117 Bridge 22009, Salisbury Bridge, West Main Street Bridge

    WI-117 Bridge 22009, Salisbury Bridge, West Main Street Bridge

    WI-117 Bridge 22009, Salisbury Bridge, West Main Street Bridge Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 08-29-2003 <j_3w79o INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY/DISTRICT MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST INTERNAL NR·ELIGIBILITY REVIE\I FORM Property/District Name: Bridse 22009.MD 991 over Wicomico River Survey Numer: \II ·117 Project: Repair of Bridge 22009 Agency: SHA Site visit by MHT Staff: _x_ no yes Name Date Eligibility recamiet lded __x_ Eligibility not reconmended Criteria: _LA _B _LC _D Considerations: _A _B _c _D _E _F __G _None Justification for decision: (Use continuation sheet if necessary and attach lllap) Based on infonnation provided by SHA, Bridge 22009 does meet the National Register Criteria for individJal listing.
  • People and Power to Move the World

    People and Power to Move the World

    Parsons Bridge and Tunnel People and power to move the world. 100 M Street, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003 U.S.A. Phone: +1 202.775.3300 www.parsons.com Power to Connecting past, change present, the global and future. Parsons is a recognized leader in the design and landscape. construction of complex structures and bridges across the globe. Having completed more than 4,500 bridges and 250 tunnels around the world, we apply creative expertise to solve the most challenging issues our customers face today with a vision for the future. Massive or modest, new or rehabilitated, our purpose in every bridge and tunnel is to carry traffic safely with sound engineering and exceptional style while connecting people and places. Parsons’ Bridge and Tunnel Division provides connections and cost-efficient. By combining form with function, economy, to communities of the past, present, and future. We and sustainability, our award-winning bridges and tunnels understand the importance of our customers’ existing fulfill an important purpose and often serve as historic or infrastructure and the history of their community, as well as world-class landmarks. the principles of sustainability, safety, and quality. Parsons Across the globe, our bridges enrich skylines and our tunnels has proudly provided design, construction management, feature state-of-the-art technology. And by minimizing and inspection services for some of the world’s largest and impacts to the environment and maintaining the culture of most complex bridges. Our reputation for innovative the community, Parsons’ custom infrastructure pays homage design and construction methods, and our commitment to to the past while recognizing the importance of tomorrow.
  • A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types

    A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types

    A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types TRANSPORATION RESEARCH BOARD NAS-NRC PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This report, not released for publication, is furnished for review to members or participants in the work of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the NCHRP. Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research team. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research reported herein was performed under NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15, by Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage. Margaret Slater, AICP, of Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) was principal investigator for this project and led the preparation of the report.
  • Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive Data

    Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive Data

    Mystic River Drawbridge No. 7 HAER No. MAS Spanning Mystic River at the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Rail Line (formerly Boston & Maine Eastern Route) Right-of-Way i\ Atz O Somerville T^M^'^ Everett filrV^ , Middlesex, County q c ^- ^--\\/ Massachusetts i ^°'!" "^ PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American r.nglr;eri;g T.eccrd Mid-Attune R?gbnal Cftlcs National Park Service U.S. D.-; rutrnui- of the Interior TiiUadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 MASS, i HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD Mvstic River Drawbridge No. 7 HAER No. MA-88 Location: Spanning Mystic River on the right-of-way of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority rail line (formerly the Boston & Maine Eastern Route) at the town line between Somerville (south), SttffoH^Gounty, and Everett (north), Middlesex County, Massachusetts 'ULl"" "*"'"' UTM: 19.329250.4695250 Quad: Boston North, Massachusetts (1979) Date of Construction: 1893-1894. 1933 - Tower rebuilt. 1955 - Easterly girder built, replacing 1977 truss. 1917 - Westerly truss built. 1988-1989 - Replaced. Present Owner: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Ten Park Plaza Boston, Massachusetts 02116 Present Use: Single-track, movable span railroad bridge. Horizontal draw accommodates limited marine traffic. Significance: Drawbridge No. 7 is apparently the last horizontally folding railroad bridge in the eastern United States. Its technology is representative of the earliest patented movable span bridge in the country (patented by Joseph Ross of Ipswich, Massachusetts, in 1849). The horizontally folding draw was a common railroad bridge type in the Greater Boston area since the 1840s. All except Drawbridge No. 7 have been removed and/or replaced. Project Information: Mary Elizabeth McCahon Abba G.
  • Use Style: Paper Title

    Use Style: Paper Title

    AUTOMATED FOOT BRIDGE FOR RAILWAY STATION (SMART WAY OF CROSSING TRACKS) Prof. Harish C. Ringe1, Prof. Anushree B. Chaudhari2, Prof. Chitra E. Ghodke3 1,2,3Civil Engineering Dept.,Csmss College of Polytechnic, Aurangabad ABSTRACT This Paper will explain use of Automated Foot Bridge in Railway station to overcome the problem of passing tracks (from one platform to another) in less time period with less efforts, Automated Foot bridge is designed to overcome the accidental problems occurring on the railway stations during passengers crossing the railway tracks and also it will help to transport the goods from one platform to another. Keywords—Automated Foot Bridge,Railway Station, Accidental Problems I. INTRODUCTION As India is fast growing country we are trying to develop our transportation system to fulfill the need of population and as we knows train is one of the best mode of transportation to travel from one place to another, but when time comes to use this mode of transportation people are being irritated due to the crowd and the systems adopted at railway stations to reach on platforms from one to another. And to avoid the time consumption and efforts many of the people choose to reach the platform by crossing the track directly and due to this many of the time accidents occur and many of the people lose their life. According to http://wonderfulmumbai.com website 10 people die every day in railway accidents in Mumbai. 36,152 people have died and 36,688 injured on Mumbai’s Suburban (Local) Trains, from 2002 to 2012. Of the 36,152 deaths, 15,053 occurred on Mumbai’s Western Railway line and 21,099 occurred on Mumbai’s Central Railway.
  • SAM PRONATION BRIDGE for Fast Transportation and Ship Convenience

    SAM PRONATION BRIDGE for Fast Transportation and Ship Convenience

    ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print): 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal) Visit: www.ijirset.com Vol. 7, Issue 5, May 2018 SAM PRONATION BRIDGE for Fast Transportation and Ship Convenience Shubham Sortee 1, Ankit Khiradkar 1, Milind Gaymukhe 1, Avinash Madne 1, Shraddha Mandaokar 1, Manoj Deosarkar 2 Engineering Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Dr. D Y Patil School of Engineering and Technology College, Lohgaon, Pune, India 1 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Dr. D Y Patil School of Engineering and Technology College, Lohgaon, Pune, India 2 ABSTRACT: The bridge is a structure which makes transportation easy and fast as per demand of day to day increasing traffic volume, which are made for saving time and provide ease in personal and professional lifestyle. The structural concept is developed from the existing bascule bridges. The bridge we are going to design is not been used before, it is not very different than existing bridges. It’s kind of similar to the rotational bridges but they are suspended on pier at the centre which is constructed on the river, lake, etc. and it is also very difficult to construct such a piers for long span bridges, hence the “SAM PRONATION BRIDGE” is a solution for this. The mechanism that we are providing for rotation, need some power for making movement of bridge, so the connections of controls are from bank of river or lake, hence reduces the chances of failure. In this project we have consider all the cons of existing bridges and trying to make some improvement in them.
  • South Park Bascule Bridge Replacement

    South Park Bascule Bridge Replacement

    South Park Bascule Bridge Replacement APWA Washington Public Works Project of the Year Award Category: Transportation, More than $75 million Public Works Project of the Year A w a r d Nomination Form Deadline January 15, 2015 Primary Contractor (electronic submitttals only) Jason Silva Project Name Name Project Manager Title Project Completion Date Must be substantially completed (90%) and available for public Kiewit-Massman, a Joint Venture Agency/Organization use as of December 31, 2014. September 2, 2014 33455 Sixth Avenue South Address (if post oce box, include street address) Public Agency Federal Way WA 98003 City State/Province Zip-Postal Code 253-943-4181 Phone Fax Project Category Structures [email protected] Transportation E-mail Environment Historical Restoration/Preservation Primary Consultant Disaster or Emergency Construction/Repair Project Division Name Less than $5 Million $5 Million, but less than $25 Million Title $25 Million–$75 Million More than $75 Million Agency/Organization Managing Agency Address (if post oce box, include street address) Name City State/Province Zip/Postal Code Title ARDS Phone Fax Agency/Organization AW E-mail Address (if post oce box, include street address) Continued... City State/Province Zip/Postal Code 2015 APWA Phone Fax PROFESSIONAL E-mail Public Works Project of the Year Award Supporting Data Form Please address each of the following Nominated by: (Can only be nominated by managing areas in your nomination, adhering to the public agency or APWA chapters.) Projects that involve or reside sequence below when possible. within two or more chapters locations can be co-nomiated. Each chapter will receive credit to submit a PACE nomination.