DOCSLIB.ORG

Differences in Base of Articulation for Consonants Among Catalan Dialects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Differences in Base of Articulation for Consonants Among Catalan Dialects Original Paper Phonetica 2010;67:201–218 Received: September 2, 2010 DOI: 10.1159/000322312 Accepted: October 17, 2010 Differences in Base of Articulation for Consonants among Catalan Dialects Daniel Recasens Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona, Spain Abstract Electropalatographic data for several front lingual consonants, i.e., the den- tal /t/, the alveolars /n, l, s, r/ and the alveolopalatals /tʃ, ʃ, ʎ, ɲ/, show differences in constriction anteriority among Catalan dialects varying in the progression Valencian > Eastern, with the Majorcan dialect occupying an intermediate posi- tion. These differences do not conform to speaker- dependent differences in palate morphology and, to the extent that they operate on a varied range of conso- nants, may be attributed to base of articulation. Deviations from this pattern are associated with manner of articulation and symmetry demands. A specific dialect- dependent relationship between tongue dorsum contact and constriction fronting is interpreted assuming the existence of less laminal, more apical dental and alveolar stops, and less dorsal, more laminal alveolopalatals, in Valencian than in the other two dialects. These data are interpreted in terms of the articula- tory characteristics for different tongue front settings which have been proposed in the literature. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel 1. Introduction 1.1. Articulatory Positioning While the terms ‘articulatory setting’ and ‘base of articulation’ enjoy a long tradi- tion in the phonetics literature, very few studies have examined their scientific validity by means of experimental data. Several phoneticians suggest that differences in ‘accent’ among languages stem from the way speakers place their articulatory organs for pro- ducing vowels and consonants in continuous speech. Moreover, it may be argued that the articulatory setting of a particular language may remain relatively unmodified for long periods of time and, consequently, could shape language sound inventories and trigger specific sound changes and phonological processes. Language- and dialect- dependent differences in base of articulation may be traced through differences in tongue and lip configuration for vowels [Disner, 1983], and in constriction location and in the primary lingual articulator for consonants. The present © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel Daniel Recasens 0031–8388/10/0674–0201 Departament de Filologia Catalana Fax ϩ41 61 306 12 34 $26.00/0 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona E- Mail [email protected] Accessible online at: Bellaterra 08193, Barcelona (Spain) www.karger.com www.karger.com/pho Tel. +34 3 457 8183, Fax +34 3 581 2782 E- Mail [email protected] investigation deals with settings of the anterior region of the tongue according to which dialects and languages may favor front lingual consonants produced against the teeth and front alveolar zone with the tongue blade rather than with the tongue tip (e.g., French), or else at the more retracted central and back alveolar zones with the tip rather than with the blade (e.g., English) [Delattre, 1953; Honikman, 1964; Laver, 1980, p. 49]. In a carefully conducted palatographic study, Dart [1991, 1998, p. 32] has reported indeed that /t, d, n/ are mostly apicolamino- dental in French and apico- alveolar in English. It has also been stated that differences in place of articulation and in primary articu- lator may co- occur with differences in placement and configuration of the tongue body, which has been reported to be advanced, raised and convex to the roof of the mouth in languages exhibiting a laminal setting (French), and posterior, lowered and concave in languages showing an apical setting (English) [Honikman, 1964]. These language- dependent differences in tongue body position and shape could explain differences in degree of darkness in /l/ (i.e., /l/ is ‘light’ in French and ‘dark’ in English), and possibly the presence of a large number of alveolopalatal consonants in French. Moreover, they have been argued to account for differences in vowel quality, i.e., ‘bright’ vowels in French as opposed to ‘dull’ and central vowels in English [Heffner, 1950, p. 99], and for specific vowel changes, i.e., /a/ fronting into /ε/ in French [mer MARE; Malmberg, 1974, p. 246]. According to early studies [Heffner, 1950, p. 99; O’Connor, 1973, p. 289], prefer- ence for the tongue blade over the tongue tip as the primary articulator could induce a higher degree of tongue pressure and tension during front lingual consonant produc- tion, e.g., in French versus English. Possible correlates of an increase in tension are expected to be the formation of a larger tongue contact area at constriction location, a higher intraoral and/or subglottal pressure and a slower constriction release [Laver, 1980, pp. 149– 156]. The jaw may also contribute to the tongue tip and blade settings. Experimental data reveal that the jaw occupies a lower position during consonant production in English than in French [Gick et al., 2004; Wilson, 2006], which matches a well- known trend for apical consonants to exhibit a lower jaw than laminal ones [see Lindblad and Lundqvist, 2003 for /l/, and Honikman, 1964, pp. 78– 79 for retroflex consonants in the languages of India and Pakistan]. Early descriptive studies have pointed out, however, that the jaw is kept slightly open by speakers of French and loosely closed by speakers of English [Honikman, 1964], and moves less in the latter language than in the former [O’Connor, 1973, p. 289]. 1.2. Symmetry and Manner of Articulation Articulatory symmetry, i.e., a trend for phonetic segments specified for a given place or manner feature to exhibit the same or a highly similar articulatory implemen- tation of that feature, needs to be taken into consideration in studies dealing with artic- ulatory setting. Symmetry appears to play a relevant role in the distribution of vowels in vowel spaces, mostly so regarding F1, since this formant is the main spectral correlate of vowel height and is more intense than other formants [Lindblom, 1986; Boersma, 1998, pp. 347– 350]. This characteristic holds for the number of vowels in vowel inventories, i.e., languages tend to have the same number of mid front and mid back vowels. It also applies to the vowel formant frequencies, i.e., both mid front and mid 202 Phonetica 2010;67:201–218 Recasens back vowels show a very similar F1 frequency in five vowel systems and may share particularly open or close realizations (e.g., both /ε/ and /ɔ/ are particularly open in the Majorcan and Valencian dialects of Catalan [Recasens and Espinosa, 2006a, 2009]). There is some evidence that consonants agreeing in place but not in manner of articulation may be produced with roughly the same constriction location provided that the manner requirements for at least one of the consonants subject to compari- son do not prevent this symmetrical relationship from occurring. Thus, in Majorcan Catalan, the nasal stop phoneme /ɲ/ and the oral stop allophone [c] of /k/ may share approximately the same closure location either at the alveolopalatal or at the palatal zone depending on speaker [Recasens and Espinosa, 2006b]. It has also been shown that the constriction placement for /ʃ/ may agree very closely with the constriction and, less so, the closure location for the affricate /tʃ/ [Dixit and Hoffman, 2004; Recasens and Espinosa, 2007b]. It appears, therefore, that consonants subject to a symmetrical relationship ought to be related in a similar way to a specific base of articulation char- acteristic. Thus, the place of articulation of the two consonants /c/ and /ɲ/, as well as that of /ʃ/ and /tʃ/, referred to above is expected to be more anterior or more posterior depending on the language or dialect taken into account. Laterals, fricatives and trills may not conform to differences in articulatory set- ting in line with the strict manner of articulation demands involved in their production [Mennen et al., 2010]. Thus, while dentoalveolar stops are more anterior in French than in English, the opposite may hold for apical /l/, which is clear in the former language and dark in the latter (see also section 1.3), and /s/ has been reported to be mostly laminal (less apical) in the two languages [Dart, 1998]. In a similar fashion, the lateral phoneme /ʎ/ is articulated invariably at the alveolar or alveolo- prepalatal zone in the Romance languages and thus, at a more anterior location than the alveolopalatal or palatal cognates /ɲ/ and /c/, presumably since its production requires the formation of one or two channels at the sides of the oral cavity for the passage of airflow [Recasens and Espinosa, 2006b]. Once manner of articulation requirements and the possible effect of symmetry are taken into consideration, a given articulatory setting is expected to affect all or the majority of the phonetic segments produced at a specific articulatory zone, e.g., front lingual consonants, front vowels. This is so since the base of articulation charac- teristics are supposed to be present ‘more or less all the time that a person is talking’ [Abercrombie, 1967, p. 91]. 1.3. The Catalan Case Linguopalatal contact data obtained by means of electropalatography (EPG) reveal differences in constriction anteriority for consonants among the three Catalan dialects Eastern (which is spoken in the Eastern part of Catalonia, a region located in the northeast of Spain), Majorcan (which is spoken in the island of Majorca) and Valencian (which is spoken in the Valencian provinces located south of Catalonia and bordering on Spanish territories to the west). A clear case is that of the lingual fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/, which have been found to be articulated with a more anterior constriction in Valencian than in the other two dialects; moreover, based on EPG data on constric- tion location, length and shape, it has been suggested that the lingual constriction is more laminal in Valencian and more apical in Majorcan and Eastern in the case of /s/, and laminal or lamino- predorsal in Majorcan and just laminal in Valencian in the case Base of Articulation for Catalan Consonants Phonetica 2010;67:201–218 203 of /ʃ/ [Recasens and Espinosa, 2007b].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tlingit Phonology in a Generative Framework
    TLINGIT PHONOLOGY IN A GENERATIVE FRAMEWORK: AN EXAMINATION OF PHONOLOGICAL PROCESSES AND ABSTRACT REPRESENTATION by GAELAN^/de WOLF B.A., University of British Columbia, 1971 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Linguistics We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August, 1977 GAELAN de WOLF, 1977 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Gaelan de Wolf Department of T.-mpn-i «t-i rs The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 Date /V? /ff? - ii - ABSTRACT The Saussurean Paradox described by Labov (1971), in which "the social aspect of language can be studied by the theorist asking himself questions, while the individual aspect can only be studied by a social survey", apparently mirrors a predicament occurring in the structuralist and generative models of linguistics. For, while descriptive and structuralist linguistic models seek to mirror the reality of particular languages, a generative model of linguistics, in a search for universals, attempts to discover the underlying reality of all languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Introduction to The
    PREVIEW OF THE IPA HANDBOOK Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet PARTI Introduction to the IPA 1. What is the International Phonetic Alphabet? The aim of the International Phonetic Association is to promote the scientific study of phonetics and the various practical applications of that science. For both these it is necessary to have a consistent way of representing the sounds of language in written form. From its foundation in 1886 the Association has been concerned to develop a system of notation which would be convenient to use, but comprehensive enough to cope with the wide variety of sounds found in the languages of the world; and to encourage the use of thjs notation as widely as possible among those concerned with language. The system is generally known as the International Phonetic Alphabet. Both the Association and its Alphabet are widely referred to by the abbreviation IPA, but here 'IPA' will be used only for the Alphabet. The IPA is based on the Roman alphabet, which has the advantage of being widely familiar, but also includes letters and additional symbols from a variety of other sources. These additions are necessary because the variety of sounds in languages is much greater than the number of letters in the Roman alphabet. The use of sequences of phonetic symbols to represent speech is known as transcription. The IPA can be used for many different purposes. For instance, it can be used as a way to show pronunciation in a dictionary, to record a language in linguistic fieldwork, to form the basis of a writing system for a language, or to annotate acoustic and other displays in the analysis of speech.
    [Show full text]
  • SSC: the Science of Talking
    SSC: The Science of Talking (for year 1 students of medicine) Week 3: Sounds of the World’s Languages (vowels and consonants) Michael Ashby, Senior Lecturer in Phonetics, UCL PLIN1101 Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology A Lecture 4 page 1 Vowel Description Essential reading: Ashby & Maidment, Chapter 5 4.1 Aim: To introduce the basics of vowel description and the main characteristics of the vowels of RP English. 4.2 Definition of vowel: Vowels are produced without any major obstruction of the airflow; the intra-oral pressure stays low, and vowels are therefore sonorant sounds. Vowels are normally voiced. Vowels are articulated by raising some part of the tongue body (that is the front or the back of the tongue notnot the tip or blade) towards the roof of the oral cavity (see Figure 1). 4.3 Front vowels are produced by raising the front of the tongue towards the hard palate. Back vowels are produced by raising the back of the tongue towards the soft palate. Central vowels are produced by raising the centre part of the tongue towards the junction of the hard and soft palates. 4.4 The height of a vowel refers to the degree of raising of the relevant part of the tongue. If the tongue is raised so as to be close to the roof of the oral cavity then a close or high vowel is produced. If the tongue is only slightly raised, so that there is a wide gap between its highest point and the roof of the oral cavity, then an open or lowlowlow vowel results.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflectional and Derivational Hebrew Morphology According to the Theory of Phonology As Human Behavior
    BEN- GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV FACULTY OF HUMINITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN LITERATURES AND LINGUISTICS INFLECTIONAL AND DERIVATIONAL HEBREW MORPHOLOGY ACCORDING TO THE THEORY OF PHONOLOGY AS HUMAN BEHAVIOR THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS LINA PERELSHTEIN UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: PROFESSOR YISHAI TOBIN FEBRUARY 2008 BEN- GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN LITERATURES AND LINGUISTICS INFLECTIONAL AND DERIVATIONAL HEBREW MORPHOLOGY ACCORDING TO THE THEORY OF PHONOLOGY AS HUMAN BEHAVIOR THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS LINA PERELSHTEIN UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF PROFESSOR YISHAI TOBIN Signature of student: ________________ Date: _________ Signature of supervisor: _____________ Date: _________ Signature of chairperson of the committee for graduate studies: ______________ Date: _________ FEBRUARY 2008 ABSTRACT This research deals with the phonological distribution of Hebrew Inflectional and Derivational morphology, synchronically and diachronically. The scope of this study is suffixes, due to the fact that final position bears grammatical information, while initial position bears lexical items. In order to analyze the gathered data, the theory of Phonology as Human Behavior will be employed. The theory classifies language as a system of signs which is used by human beings to communicate; it is based on the synergetic principle of maximum communication with minimal effort. This research shows that the similarity within Modern Hebrew inflectional and derivational suffix system is greater than the derivational Modern Hebrew – Biblical Hebrew system in terms of a specialized suffix system and that the phonological distribution of Hebrew suffixes is motivated by the principles of the theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Tutorial 5.5 Accesstruth
    MODULE 5 - COMMUNICATION FOUNDATIONS ACCESSTRUTH TUTORIAL Phonetics 3 5.5 This tutorial continues to look at the manner of articulation of various speech sounds. Introduction In the last tutorial we started to look at manner of articulation - the type and degree of obstruction of the airflow when consonants are made. We have already looked at the oral stops and the nasal stops. In this tutorial we will look at the manner of articulation of some more types of consonants. Fricatives With all the sounds that we’ve discussed so far (the stops) there’s a brief complete obstruction of the airflow. If we bring one articulator very close to another, the airflow can pass between the two articulators but has to go through a very narrow passage, creating a kind of noise. The sounds made in this way are fricatives. Usually with fricatives the velum is raised, so that air can’t escape out of the nose, though it’s continuously passing through the narrow passage out of the mouth. English doesn’t have bilabial fricatives, though some languages, including Spanish, do. English has labiodental fricatives, where the lower lip comes close to or touches the upper front teeth; the voiceless and voiced labiodental fricatives are the initial sounds in fine and vine, the symbols for them being [f] and [v] respectively. There are two sounds in English written as <th> - as in thing and this. These are voiceless and voiced dental fricatives respectively. The IPA symbols for these are [θ] and [ð]. 1 MODULE 5 - COMMUNICATION FOUNDATIONS ACCESSTRUTH English also has voiced and voiceless alveolar fricatives, as in the words sue and zoo - here we bring the tip or blade of the tongue very close to the alveolar ridge - and the symbols for them are [s] and [z].
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information C om pany 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9401204 Phonetics and phonology of Nantong Chinese Ac, Benjamin Xiaoping, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1993 Copyri^t ©1993 by Ao, Benjamin Xiaoping.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Study of English Consonants
    Lecture 04: Detailed Study of English Consonants In this lesson, we will introduce the properties of English consonants and their force, place, and manner of articulation. 1. Consonants /ˈkɒnsәnәnts/ It can be defined phonetically as the sound made by a closure or narrowing in the vocal tract so that the airflow is either completely blocked, partially, or restricted with an audible friction. There are 24 consonantal phonemes classified in the table below into two general categories: - Those articulations in which there is a total closure or a stricture causing friction. In this class, there is a distinctive opposition between fortis and lenis. - Those articulations in which there is a partial closure or an oral or nasal escape of air. Such articulations, typically voiced and frequently frictionless may share many phonetic characteristics with vowels (Gimson, p.149). IPA table contains the consonant phonemes of the English language 2. Properties of English Consonants A consonant is described in terms of manner and place of articulation and voicing. 2.1 Manner of Articulation 2.1.1. Plosive: formed by a blockage of the vocal tract, followed by an explosive release of air. As follows: 1- The CLOSING stage: the articulators move together to form the obstruction of the air breathed in. 2- The COMPRESSION stage: during which the lung compresses the air in the vocal tract. 3- The RELEASE stage: the organs forming the obstruction set apart rapidly, allowing the air to escape abruptly. There are six stops or plosive consonants in English, as follows: / p, t, k, b, d, g /. 2.1.2 Affricate: formed by a blockage of the vocal tract like plosives and, followed by a gradual release of turbulent air, like a fricative.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 the Syllable Structure of Shaoxing
    The phonology of Shaoxing Chinese Zhang, J. Citation Zhang, J. (2006, January 31). The phonology of Shaoxing Chinese. LOT dissertation series. LOT, Utrecht. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4279 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the License: Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4279 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). 4 The Syllable Structure of Shaoxing 4.1 Introduction The status of the syllable as a linguistic unit, although not uncontrover- sial, is widely accepted in present-day phonology and phonetics. Syllables may consist of a vowel or diphthong, with onsets and codas of one or more consonants. Syllables may also contain syllabic consonants. Human listeners seem to need syllables as a way of segmenting the speech stream, while speakers use syllables to impose a rhythm of strong and weak beats to language, just like in music. All languages are assumed to have syllables, although the syllable status is sometimes questioned by researchers working on languages with extreme collocations of conso- nants or vowels, such as Bella Coola (Bagemihl 1991) and Gokana (Hyman 1990, 2003).1 Levin (1985) claims that phonetic utterances in all natural human languages are made up of syllables. However, the primary evidence for the syllable seems rather phonological than phonetic, in that “the syllable is the phonological unit which organizes segmental melodies in terms of sonority; syllabic segments are equivalent to sonority peaks within these organizational units” (Blevins 1995: 207). The syllable al- lows the formulation of generalizations both at the segmental level and at higher prosodic levels, which are awkward to express without referring to this constituent.
    [Show full text]
  • Required Modification of German Language for Employment for Singing for American Students
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1979 Required Modification of German Language for Employment for Singing for American Students. Lavan Ray Robinson Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Robinson, Lavan Ray, "Required Modification of German Language for Employment for Singing for American Students." (1979). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3351. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3351 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharyngealization in Chechen Is Gutturalization Author(S)
    Pharyngealization in Chechen is gutturalization Author(s): John Sylak Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Languages of the Caucasus (2013), pp. 81-95 Editors: Chundra Cathcart, Shinae Kang, and Clare S. Sandy Please contact BLS regarding any further use of this work. BLS retains copyright for both print and screen forms of the publication. BLS may be contacted via http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/bls/. The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society is published online via eLanguage, the Linguistic Society of America's digital publishing platform. Pharyngealization in Chechen is Gutturalization JOHN SYLAK University of California, Berkeley Introduction Knowing the phonetic and phonological properties of rare types of consonants, such as clicks, implosives, and pharyngeals, is essential for understanding how they af- fect the phonological systems of the languages in which they occur.1 This study focuses on consonants with a primary or secondary pharyngeal articulation, which occur in only 21 of UPSID’s 451 languages (5.32%; Maddieson 1984). However, these segments are found in over 12 different language stocks spread across North America, Eurasia, and Africa (Nichols and Bickel 2009). Pharyngeal or pharyn- gealized consonants, then, are rare enough token-wise that they are understudied in many respects, but are phylogenetically common enough that they are important to phonological theory and historical linguistics. This study focuses on pharyngeal consonants and “pharyngealization” in Chechen, a Nakh-Daghestanian language of the northeast Caucasus region of the Russian Federation with approximately 1.3 million speakers (All-Russia Population Census 2002).2,3 Previous accounts of pharyngeal consonants and “pharyngealiza- tion” in Chechen have, with one important exception, not included instrumental 1 Acknowledgements: Many thanks to Johanna Nichols for inspiration, financial support, gathering field data, and being very patient.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian-English Dictionary of Linguistic Terminology
    Russian-English dictionary of linguistics, digital linguistics and paleography Русско-английский словарь лингвистики, цифровой лингвистики и палеографии Juliane Besters-Dilger А aдресант addresser aдресат addressee; recipient aдъективный adjectival аккоммодация accommodation актант actant акцентный accentual алгоритм algorithm аллограф allograph алломорф allomorph аллофон allophon алфавит alphabet альвеолярный (согласный) alveolar (consonant) анализ дискурса discourse analysis аннотация annotation аннотировать to annotate антецедент antecedent; reference word антология anthology антоним antonym aорист aorist апикальный (согласный) apical (consonant) апракос aprakos арго slang артикль article артикуляция articulation архаический archaic архаичный archaic архилексема archilexeme ассимиляция assimilation атрибутивный attributive аутентичность autheticity аффективный affective аффикс affix аффиксальный affixal аффиксация affixation аффриката affricate Б безличный impersonal безударный unstressed; unaccented берестяные грамоты birch bark letters; birch bark manuscripts билабиальный bilabial 1 билингв bilingual (noun) билингвал bilingual (noun) билигвизм biligualism близость closeness; proximity боковой lateral будущее (время) future (tense) буква letter буквальный literal В вводное слово modal word велярный velar велярный (согласный) velar (noun) взаимный reciprocal взрывной (согласный) explosive (consonant) вибранта vibrant (consonant) вид aspect вид глагола verbal aspect визуализация visualization визуализировать to visualize винительный
    [Show full text]
  • The Phonetics and Phonology of Retroflexes Published By
    The Phonetics and Phonology of Retroflexes Published by LOT phone: +31 30 253 6006 Trans 10 fax: +31 30 253 6000 3512 JK Utrecht e-mail: [email protected] The Netherlands http://wwwlot.let.uu.nl/ Cover illustration by Silke Hamann ISBN 90-76864-39-X NUR 632 Copyright © 2003 Silke Hamann. All rights reserved. The Phonetics and Phonology of Retroflexes Fonetiek en fonologie van retroflexen (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, Prof. Dr. W.H. Gispen, ingevolge het besluit van het College voor Promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 6 juni 2003 des middags te 4.15 uur door Silke Renate Hamann geboren op 25 februari 1971 te Lampertheim, Duitsland Promotoren: Prof. dr. T. A. Hall (Leipzig University) Prof. dr. Wim Zonneveld (Utrecht University) Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Markedness of retroflexes 3 1.2 Phonetic cues and phonological features 6 1.3 Outline of the dissertation 8 Part I: Phonetics of Retroflexes 2 Articulatory variation and common properties of retroflexes 11 2.1 Phonetic terminology 12 2.2 Parameters of articulatory variation 14 2.2.1 Speaker dependency 15 2.2.2 Vowel context 16 2.2.3 Speech rate 17 2.2.4 Manner dependency 19 2.2.4.1 Plosives 19 2.2.4.2 Nasals 20 2.2.4.3 Fricatives 21 2.2.4.4 Affricates 23 2.2.4.5 Laterals 24 2.2.4.6 Rhotics 25 2.2.4.7 Retroflex vowels 26 2.2.5 Language family 27 2.2.6 Iventory size 28 2.3 Common articulatory properties of retroflexion 32 2.3.1 Apicality 33 2.3.2 Posteriority
    [Show full text]