Canyonlands Field Drainage Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Canyonlands Field Drainage Report CANYONLANDS FIELD Moab, Utah DRAINAGE REPORT Hangar Area Drainage Analysis ACI No. 176422 July 2017 861 Rood Ave. Grand Junction, CO 81501 O: 970-242-0101 F: 970-241-1796 www.armstrongconsultants.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SCOPE OF WORK ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Narrative .................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PHOTOGRAPHS ................................................................................................................... 2-1 3.0 DRAINAGE ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Rainfall, Runoff, Storm Drain Design ......................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Proposed Storm Drainage System for Existing Conditions ........................................ 3-1 3.4 Drainage for Future Development ............................................................................. 3-2 3.5 Development Sequence ............................................................................................. 3-2 4.0 OPINION OF COST ............................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Estimate of Probable Construction Cost .................................................................... 4-1 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1 Proposed Storm Drain System Plan Appendix 2 Drainage Calculations Hangar Area Drainage Analysis TOC-1 176422 Canyonlands Field INTRODUCTION The firm of Armstrong Consultants, Inc. was retained by Grand County to provide the necessary studies and engineering analysis of the conditions located at the airport. The engineering rationale used for this drainage analysis, is presented in this report. 1.0 SCOPE OF WORK 1.1 Narrative Canyonlands Field Airport has received numerous requests for hangar space and needs to develop areas to facilitate hangar development and extend taxilanes for access. In order to facilitate development and mitigate storm water impacts with the current hangar facilities and future hangar development, a study was required to evaluate the existing and anticipated drainage requirements in the hangar area. A conceptual grading and drainage system plan was developed as part of the study to address the existing drainage concerns in the vicinity of the identified hangar development area. A conceptual grading and layout plan was developed for future apron development as depicted on the 2015 Airport Layout Plan (ALP). The drainage study evaluated the drainage patterns on the airfield and makes recommendations for improving the existing conditions, as well as storm water management recommendations for future development based up on the development as depicted on the ALP. The soils at Canyonlands Field are composed of surficial deposits that can exhibit moderate to very high swell potentials. Swell potentials vary with moisture content, density, and the clay chemistry and mineralogy, and can vary markedly both laterally and vertically. The shale weathers easily when exposed and forms soft highly erodible slopes and hills that also have the potential to be collapsible. Because of the nature of the soils found at the site, it is critical that the developed areas be drained effectively to minimize the fluctuations in moisture content and also minimize erosion. Hangar Area Drainage Analysis 1-1 166393 Canyonlands Field THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2.0 PHOTOGRAPHS NORTH SIDE EXISTING APRON AREA LOOKING SOUTH MIDDLE OF EXISTING APRON AREA LOOKING SOUTH Engineer’s Design Report 2-1 166393 Canyonlands Field MIDDLE OF EXISTING APRON AREA LOOKING SOUTHWEST LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD FUTURE DEVELOPEMENT AREA Engineer’s Design Report 2-2 166393 Canyonlands Field LOOKING NORTH FROM FUTURE DEVELOPEMENT AREA Engineer’s Design Report 2-3 166393 Canyonlands Field THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 3.0 DRAINAGE 3.1 Rainfall, Runoff, Storm Drain Design Hangar and pavement development affect the area runoff due to the significant increase in impervious area and the tendency to concentrate storm water flowing off and around structures and pavement. The intent of the storm drainage system is to capture and direct the storm water off of the ramp and hangar area while minimizing pooling, erosion, or flooding in any areas in the vicinity. 3.2 Existing Conditions Currently, there are not any major storm water drainage structures in the hangar and taxilane areas. The storm water currently drains across the surface of the taxilanes and through the hangar areas from east to west. During significant rainfall events, sediment is carried by the storm water onto the pavement. The presence of hangars causes the storm water to run off of the roofs and flow in concentrated streams along the sides and between the buildings, encouraging erosion. Also, there are undeveloped low-lying areas that allow storm water to pool and remain until it absorbs into the soil or evaporates. The soil may become saturated in these areas causing the soil to swell, increasing the pressure and upward force on the foundations of the hangars. As the water in the soil dissipates or dries, the amount of swell reduces as the moisture content reduces. This fluctuation in the soil moisture content can cause movement and settling of the hangars and pavement that can lead to premature failure of the building foundation or pavement. 3.3 Proposed Storm Drainage System for Existing Conditions In order to minimize the current issues, it is recommended that a storm water runoff system is established which allows the storm water to drain in a controlled manner off of the apron and hangar area with minimal erosion or ponding. For the existing hangar area a combination of a concrete swale and a storm pipe network with inlets allows for minimal disturbance to existing underground utilities while controlling the storm water flow and reducing erosion. In areas where significant amounts of underground utilities are located, a concrete swale is proposed to capture surface flows and direct it into the underground storm drains. The concrete swale directs the storm water into an inlet connected to a series of storm pipes which would carry the storm water underground and release it to the west of the apron and hangar area. A series of inlets are connected to the storm pipe network to capture other area storm water flows. An Engineer’s Design Report 3-1 166393 Canyonlands Field opinion of cost for the proposed drainage system can be found in the Section 4 of this report. See the drainage plan in Appendix A for the proposed storm drain layout for the existing conditions. In addition to the proposed storm drain system, it may be beneficial to cover the existing soil with gravel. This would require minimal grading and would not have a significant impact on the existing underground utilities and would help reduce the amount of surface erosion that takes place during significant rainfall events. 3.4 Drainage for Future Development According to the current Airport Layout Plan, future hangar development is expected to take place to the south of the existing hangar area. The taxilanes will be extended with hangars developed alongside in a similar arrangement as the existing hangar and taxilane configuration. The proposed network of storm drains was developed to accommodate future pavement and hangar development. The storm drain system was designed with the intention of allowing the system to be constructed in segments as the hangars are developed. As each hangar is developed, the subsequent section of storm drains and inlets would be developed. Each newly constructed section would connect to the previously constructed storm drain network. The primary trunk of the storm drain would be located in a designated utility easement area defined prior to hangar and taxilane development. This would allow for the establishment a drainage pattern and controlled elevations for future development. The proposed location of the utility easement is included in the attached drawings in Appendix A. In order to effectively establish a drainage plan that can be constructed in segments, elevations and grades need to be established for the flowlines of the pipe, the inlets, the approximate hangar floor elevations, and the elevations of the future pavement. Proposed elevations are included in the drainage plan in Appendix A. An opinion of cost for this storm drain network can be found in Section 4 of this report. 3.5 Development Sequence The elevations and layout of the future development were determined in order to allow for the orderly development of the future hangar area. Because the hangar development area is on a sloping hill side, it is critical that the positioning of the pavement, hangars, and drainage system are all accounted for and Engineer’s Design Report 3-2 166393 Canyonlands Field determined prior to development. If the development is constructed according to the proposed elevations, the drainage patterns established for the drain system and pavement runoff will be functional and reduce the instances of flooding, erosion, or ponding due to hangar development. Elevations shown on the attached drawings should be used as a general guide for the development. Although hangar development may not occur
Recommended publications
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Meeting Grand County Airport Board Regular Meeting Agenda
    PUBLIC MEETING GRAND COUNTY AIRPORT BOARD REGULAR MEETING AGENDA March 6th, 2017 5:00 P.M. County Council Chambers 125 E Center St Moab, UT 84532 A. Call to Order B. General Business 1. Approve minutes of 2/06/17 Airport Board meeting. 2. Airport Monthly Data. 3. Manager’s Report and Safety Report. C. Discussion and Consideration Items for Action. 1. Approval of a ground lease for a hangar by Redtail Air. 2. Approval of modification of ground lease location for Redtail Air fuel storage farm. 3. Approval of an office lease with Arinc for radio equipment. 4. Approval of a ground lease for a hangar by Martin Snow. D. Discussion Items 1. Ongoing CIB Terminal design group update. 2. Discussion of airport billboard lease terms. 3. Discussion of Rules and Regulations, and Minimum Standards to be sent to FAA for compliance review. 4. Discussion of a possible FBO building. 5. Future private and/or county-sponsored development projects of the airport (ongoing). E. Future Considerations F. Closed Session (if necessary) G. Adjourn Those with special needs requests wishing to attend Airport Board meetings are encouraged to contact the County two (2) days in advance of these events. Specific accommodations necessary to allow participation of disabled persons will be provided to the maximum extent possible. Requests, or any questions or comments can be communicated to: (435) 259-1346. Posted by: Judd Hill, Airport Manager ___________________________________ Date ______________ Time __________ GRAND COUNTY AIRPORT BOARD March 6th, 2017 C. Discussion and consideration items 1. Approval of a ground lease for a hangar by Redtail Air.
    [Show full text]
  • Wingtips April 2015
    WingTips April 2015 E-mail not displaying correctly? View in Browser Join our mailing list April 2015 Volume 7, Issue 4 In This Issue Air Service News Hotel & Transit Center Utah Parks Frontier Airlines Announces New Denver to Raleigh- Durham Route Earth Day at DIA BA Has New Plane Starting June 11, Frontier Airlines will begin nonstop service between Denver and Electric Vehicles 747 In Museum Raleigh-Durham International Airport (RDU) in North Carolina. Famous Aviators The Kindest Flight Southwest Increasing Denver Flights in June Southwest is increasing its service from Denver, beginning June 7, 2015. The new flights will be between Denver and Austin, Baltimore, Boston, Columbus, Houston (Hobby), Minneapolis-St. Paul, Orlando, Phoenix, Pittsburgh, Portland, Raleigh-Durham, and Seattle. Southwest Airlines' added nonstop flights bring the airline's current Denver market volume of 174 daily flights up to 185. Completion of the Westin Denver International Airport Hotel and Conference Center is moving quickly and will be completed in November 2015. With many of the rooms Southwest's Weekly Flight to Albany Begins June 7 carpeted, wallpapered, and illuminated, the hotel is a sight to see! The new hotel and Once a week on Saturdays, conference center will provide many amenities to the metro Denver area and will be effective June 7, 2015, home to several new public art pieces that will be installed this spring. nonstop service between Albany, N.Y. (ALB), and Construction Update: Denver begins on Southwest Airlines. Paver installation is underway on the plaza, just outside Terminal Level 5 Carpet has been laid in both hotel ballrooms United Adds Twice-Weekly Exterior doors to both west and east restaurants have been installed on the Flights Between Denver and plaza level North Bend, Ore.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Airlines U.S Service Trends
    Alabama Summary of scheduled passenger air service 6 airports with scheduled service between 2013 and 2017 • BHM (Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International) -2% departures / -4% seats • DHN (Dothan Regional) -1% departures / -1% seats • HSV (Huntsville International-Carl T Jones Field) -11% departures / -6% seats • MGM (Montgomery Regional) -16% departures / -8% seats • MOB (Mobile Regional) -5% departures / +5% seats • MSL (Northwest Alabama Regional *EAS) +101% departures / -52% seats Overall: departures down -5% and seats down -4% Regional airlines provide 76% of Alabama passenger air service 11 RAA member airlines provide scheduled service to • ExpressJet, PSA, Mesa, SkyWest, Endeavor, Air Wisconsin, Envoy, Trans States, GoJet, Republic, Piedmont State Economic Impact of Small Community Air Service in 2015: $3.6 billion & 41,000 jobs (InterVISTAS Consulting LLC) Source: RAA Analysis of Oliver Wyman PlaneStats OAG schedule data November 2017 Alaska Summary of scheduled passenger air service 213 airports with scheduled service between 2013 and 2017 • DIO (Little Diomede Heliport) lost all air service in 2013 • KKU (Ekuk Airport) lost all air service in 2015 Overall: departures down -9% and seats down -1% Regional airlines: • provide exclusive air service to 94% of Alaska’s airports • provide 89% of Alaska passenger air service (departures) • carried 34% of Alaska passengers in 2016 4 RAA member airlines provide scheduled service to Alaska • Corvus Airlines dba Ravn Alaska, Horizon, Compass, SkyWest Corvus Airlines, Inc. dba Ravn
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace in Utah Major Airports
    EDCUTAH INDUSTRY PROFILE | FY 18-19 AEROSPACE IN UTAH MAJOR AIRPORTS Logan–Cache Airport (LGU) Wendover Airport (ENV) Delta Municipal Airport (DTA) UTAH SYSTEM OF TECHNICAL COLLEGES MAJOR EMPLOYERS Brigham City Airport (BMC) Provo Municipal Airport (PVU) Canyonlands Field Airport (CNY) 1 Bridgerland Tech 5 Mountainland Tech 1 TTM Technologies Ogden–Hinckley Airport (OGD) Roosevelt Municipal Airport (DIK) Cedar City Regional Airport (CDC) 2 Ogden-Weber Tech 6 Uintah Basin Tech 2 BAE Systems Salt Lake International Vernal Regional Airport (VEL) Blanding Municipal Airport (BDG) 3 Davis Tech 7 Southwest Tech 3 Barnes Aerospace Airport (SLC) Carbon County Regional St. George Municipal Airport (SGU) 4 Tooele Tech 8 Dixie Tech 4 Borsight South Valley Regional Airport (PUC) Airport (U42) 5 JBT Aerotech 6 Janicki Industries A 7 Kihomac 8 Mission Support LOGAN 9 Northrop Grumman (LGU) 10 Petersen 1 1 1 2 11 Williams International 12 Albany (BMC) Aerostructures 1 Composites 2 OGDEN 13 Boeing (OGD) A 2 2 14 Hexcel 15 L-3 B Communications SALT LAKE CITY 16 Lockheed Martin B 3 4 5 3 (SLC) 17 Moog 21 18 Parker Hannifin (ENV) 6 Flourishing Industry, Affordable Business 3 19 Curtiss-Wright 4 (U42) 20 4 5 Rockwell Collins 5 (VEL) 21 Triumph Gear Climate, Superior Workforce PROVO 6 Systems (DIK) (PVU) C 6 7 22 Duncan Aviation Industry • In 2015, Utah’s post-performance tax incentives 23 General Atomics Aeronautical • Utah is proud to be home to companies like program facilitated nearly 25,000 new jobs and more Systems Boeing, Orbital ATK, Northrop Grumman, L-3 than $65 M in capital investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Version of the Directory for Free As Well
    IDWEST FLYER M AGAZINE AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2021 Published For & By The Midwest Aviation Community Since 1978 midwestflyer.com AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2021 MIDWEST FLYER MAGAZINE 3 Vol. 42. No. 5 ContentsContents ISSN: 0194-5068 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2021 ON THE COVER: Seaplane activity at Harbor View Pub & Eatery on Long Lake in Phillips, Wisconsin. The restaurant and lake are located across the highway on the west end of Price County Airport (KPBH). Dave Weiman Photo HEADLINES Wisconsin Aviation Celebrates Four Decades of Service ......................................... 12 AOPA, COPA Urge Canada To Allow Pilots With Basic Med To Fly In Canada ....... 14 Breezy Point Aviation Days 2021 Was A Go! ............................................................ 30 Carver Aero Acquires Janesville Jet Center .............................................................. 39 First In-Flight Livestream Brings Spaceflight Experience To Audiences Around The World ......................................................................42-43 Jet It & JetClub Move Forward With Electric Airplanes ........................................44-45 LSA Maintenance Training – A Rare Opportunity ................................................46-48 Ohio Air & Space Hall of Fame (OAS) Forms Inaugural Board of Trustees, Announces Name Change As Plans To Renovate Historic 1929 Port Columbus Air Terminal Move Forward .............................................54-55 Anyone Giving or Receiving Instruction In A Limited, Primary or Experimental Category Aircraft, Is At Risk of Violating
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering Hilton Worldwide News to the Travel Agent. 2
    November to January 2020 HotsheetDELIVERING HILTON WORLDWIDE NEWS TO THE TRAVEL AGENT. 2 HILTON FOR BusinessGetting down to business has never been soTravel rewarding Homewood Suites by Hilton Atlanta/Perimeter Center Canopy by Hilton Dallas Uptown Atlanta, Georgia, United States Dallas, Texas, United States • Off GA-400 in the Perimeter Center with easy access to • Set in a walkable district with easy access to downtown downtown Atlanta • 150 rooms and suites with Nespresso® machine, 55” TV, sitting area, and • 114 suites with full kitchen, work area, 39” TV, and blackout curtains built-in fridge drawer • On-site conference space, plus convenient business center • 3,500 sq. ft. of top-floor event space offering many flexible layout options • Pool and fitness center, plus complimentary breakfast, evening social, • Fitness center, Upside West Village rooftop lounge, Canopy Central café, and local shuttle and gift shop • 35 minutes from Hartsfield–Jackson International Airport • 15 minutes from Dallas Love Field Airport Hilton San Francisco Financial District Waldorf Astoria Atlanta Buckhead San Francisco, California, United States Atlanta, Georgia, United States • A prime location in downtown San Francisco close to Chinatown and • An upscale retreat in Atlanta’s Buckhead neighborhood the Financial District • 127 rooms and suites with walk-in shower, private balcony, velvet furniture, • 544 rooms and suites with 32” TV, safe, ergonomic workspace, and • desk, and closet sitting area • Boardroom, ballroom, 5 conference rooms, foyer, and private
    [Show full text]
  • Trends and Market Forces Shaping Small Community Air Service in the United States
    Trends and Market Forces Shaping Small Community Air Service in the United States Michael D. Wittman MIT International Center for Air Transportation William S. Swelbar MIT International Center for Air Transportation Report No. ICAT-2013-02 MIT Small Community Air Service White Paper No. 1 May 2013 1 Introduction to paper series This report, Trends and Market Forces Shaping Small Community Air Service in the United States, is the first in a series of papers written under the umbrella of the MIT Small Community Air Service White Paper series. The aim of the paper series is to examine and analyze the past, current, and anticipated future trends of small community air service in the United States. The series is intended for a general audience of airline and airport executives, aviation policy makers, the news media, and anyone with an interest in the availability of commercial air service at the nation’s smaller airports. The authors of this paper series hope that these reports will serve to inform the policy debate with relevant and accurate statistical analysis, such that those responsible for deciding the future of small community air service will do so armed with factual basis for their actions. The authors of the MIT Small Community Air Service White Paper series are members of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s International Center for Air Transportation, one of the nation’s premier centers for aviation, airline, and airport research. Financial support for study authors has been provided in part by the MIT Airline Industry Consortium, an interdisciplinary group of airlines, airport councils, policy makers, and advocacy groups dedicated to improving the state of the practice of air transportation research in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report
    National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report Location: Moab, UT Accident Number: WPR17FA035 Date & Time: 12/12/2016, 0537 MST Registration: N772RT QUEST AIRCRAFT COMPANY LLC Aircraft: Aircraft Damage: Destroyed KODIAK 100 Defining Event: Loss of control in flight Injuries: 1 Fatal Flight Conducted Under: Part 135: Air Taxi & Commuter - Non-scheduled Analysis The commercial pilot was departing on a routine positioning flight in dark night visual meteorological conditions. Footage from a security camera at the airport showed the airplane take off normally and initiate a right turn, which was the established direction of traffic for the takeoff runway. The airplane continued the right turn, then entered an increasingly rapid descent and subsequently impacted terrain about 1 mile southwest from the airport. The wreckage distribution was consistent with a high-energy impact. Examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Autopsy and toxicology testing of the pilot did not reveal any evidence of impairment or incapacitation. Visual conditions prevailed in the area at the time of the accident; however, the setting Moon was obscured by cloud cover, and the airport was located in an area of remote, sparsely-populated high desert terrain. This would have resulted in few visual references to which the pilot could have oriented the airplane. Although the pilot had experience operating in this environment in night conditions and held an instrument rating, the circumstances of the accident are consistent with the known effects of spatial disorientation. The investigation could not determine the initiating event which led to the pilot's mismatch between the airplane's perceived and actual attitude; however, he likely experienced a sensory illusion as a result of spatial disorientation, which led to a loss of control.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Airport Rates and Charges
    Airport Rates and Charges 2018 Update Prepared by: In Coordination with: Table of Contents Participating Airports 1 Other Airport Building Leases 51 Airport Ownership 3 FBO Owned Leased Facilities 54 Commercial Service 6 Parking Fees 56 Commercial Service Providers 7 Through the Fence Agreements 57 Carrier Types 8 Temp Use and Special Events 58 Use Agreement Type 9 Airport Marketing 59 Airline Fees 10 Airport Insurance Info 63 Concessions and Advertising 14 Car Rentals and CFCs 17 Car Rental Fees 20 Ground Transportation 23 GA Landing Fees 25 Ramp Fees 26 Tie-Down Fees 27 For more information please contact: Fuel Vendors and Fees 29 Firefighting Fuel Fees 32 Wyoming Department of Transportation Airport T-Hangars 35 Aeronautics Division Airport Box Hangars 38 5300 Bishop Blvd. Large Box Hangars 40 Cheyenne, WY 82009 Waitlists 42 Ground Leases 44 Phone: (307) 777-3952 2018 Participating Airports Airport Name Airport ID State City NPIAS Class Based Aircraft Operations Afton Lincoln County Airport AFO WY Afton Local 37 8600 Big Piney / Marbleton Miley Memorial Field BPI WY Big Piney Basic 9 2625 Camp Guernsey Municipal Airport GUR WY Guernsey Non‐NPIAS 4 3900 Casper/Natrona County International Airport CPR WY Casper Primary‐Non Hub 123 33930 Cheyenne Regional Airport CYS WY Cheyenne Regional 77 45389 Converse County Airport DGW WY Douglas Local 33 4260 Dixon Airport DWX WY Encampment Basic 5 1190 Dubois Municipal Airport DUB WY Dubois Local 16 1775 Evanston‐Uinta County Airport / Burns Field EVW WY Evanston Local 15 5555 Fort Bridger Airport
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Changes in Connectivity at U.S. Airports: a Small Community Perspective
    Modeling Changes in Connectivity at U.S. Airports: A Small Community Perspective Michael D. Wittman MIT International Center for Air Transportation William S. Swelbar MIT International Center for Air Transportation Report No. ICAT-2013-05 MIT Small Community Air Service White Paper No. 2 June 2013 Introduction to paper series This report, Modeling Changes in Connectivity at U.S. Airports: A Small Community Perspective, is the second in a series of papers written under the umbrella of the MIT Small Community Air Service White Paper series. The aim of the paper series is to examine and analyze the past, current, and anticipated future trends of small community air service in the United States. The series is intended for a general audience of airline and airport executives, aviation policy makers, the news media, and anyone with an interest in the availability of commercial air service at the nation’s smaller airports. The authors of this paper series hope that these reports will serve to inform the policy debate with relevant and accurate statistical analysis, such that those responsible for deciding the future of small community air service will do so armed with factual basis for their actions. The authors of the MIT Small Community Air Service White Paper series are members of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s International Center for Air Transportation, one of the nation’s premier centers for aviation, airline, and airport research. Financial support for study authors has been provided in part by the MIT Airline Industry Consortium, an interdisciplinary group of airlines, airport councils, manufacturers, suppliers, policy makers, and advocacy groups dedicated to improving the state of the practice of air transportation research in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Tuesday, June 7, 2016
    GRAND COUNTY MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING Grand County Council Chambers 125 East Center Street, Moab, Utah AGENDA Tuesday, June 7, 2016 4:00 pm Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Minutes (Diana Carroll, Secretary) A. March 1, 2016 (Municipal Building Authority Special Meeting) Formatted: Font color: Black A.B. March 15, 2016 (Municipal Building Authority Special Meeting), Postponed from May 17, 2016 B.C. May 17, 2016 (Municipal Building Authority Special Meeting) Presentations (none) Discussion Items (none) Action Items C.D. Ratifying the President’s signature on a revised application to the Utah State Community Impact Board for funding the remodeling of the existing Grand County Airport Terminal Building at Canyonlands Field Airport (Judd Hill, Grand County Airport Manager) Public Hearings – Possible Action Items (none) Closed Session(s) (if necessary) Adjourn NOTICE OF SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION DURING PUBLIC MEETINGS. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals with special needs requests wishing to attend County Council meetings are encouraged to contact the County two (2) business days in advance of these events. Specific accommodations necessary to allow participation of disabled persons will be provided to the maximum extent possible. T.D.D. (Telecommunication Device for the Deaf) calls can be answered at: (435) 259-1346. Individuals with speech and/or hearing impairments may also call the Relay Utah by dialing 711. Spanish Relay Utah: 1 (888) 346-3162 It is hereby the policy of Grand County that elected and appointed representatives, staff and members of Grand County Council may participate in meetings through electronic means. Any form of telecommunication may be used, as long as it allows for real time interaction in the way of discussions, questions and answers, and voting.
    [Show full text]