DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplement to the Soil Survey of Santa Clara Area, California, Western Part

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplement to the Soil Survey of Santa Clara Area, California, Western Part United States Department of Agriculture Supplement to the Natural Soil Survey of Resources Conservation Service Santa Clara Area, California, Western Part National Cooperative Soil Survey This document was made for the National Cooperative Soil Survey by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, in cooperation with the Regents of the University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources (Agricultural Experiment Station); the Guadalupe-Coyote Resource Conservation District; the Mid-Peninsula Regional Open Space District; the Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Department; the Santa Clara County Open Space Authority; and Stanford University. This supplement accompanies the most current official data for the soil survey of the Santa Clara Area, California, Western Part, available at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/. Acknowledgement is also given to the many cities and towns within the survey area who granted permission for the soil survey to be conducted on their public lands. These include Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Santa Clara, San Jose, Saratoga, and Sunnyvale. This document is part of the technical assistance furnished by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hollister, California Office to the Guadalupe-Coyote Resource Conservation District. Literature Citation The correct citation for this survey is as follows: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2015. Supplement to the Soil Survey of the Santa Clara Area, California, Western Part. (Accessible online at: http://soils.usda.gov/survey/printed_surveys/) Cover Caption View looking southeast across the cities of the Santa Clara Valley to the Diablo Ranges and Santa Cruz Mountains. Photo courtesy NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California. Photo circa 1995. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available online from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/. i Nondiscrimination Statement The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, whether all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information. The Department prohibits discrimination in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency’s EEO Counselor (http://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/33081.wba) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html. If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, found online at http://www.ascr.usda. gov/complaint_filing_cust.html or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the form. Send your completed complaint form or letter by email to program.intake@usda. gov or by mail to: USDA Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 If you are deaf, are hard of hearing, or have speech disabilities and you wish to file either an EEO or program complaint, please contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339 or (800) 845-6136 (in Spanish). If you have other disabilities and wish to file a program complaint, please see the contact information above. If you require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.), please contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). ii Contents Preface......................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 General Nature of the Survey Area ............................................................................1 Physiography, Relief, and Drainage .......................................................................1 Major Land Resource Areas ..................................................................................5 History and Development ......................................................................................6 Climate .................................................................................................................10 Table 1.—Temperature and Precipitation...........................................................12 Table 2.—Freeze Dates in Spring and Fall ........................................................13 Table 3.—Growing Season ................................................................................13 Urban Use of Soils ...................................................................................................14 How This Survey Was Made ....................................................................................15 Classification of the Soils ..........................................................................................17 Soil Series and Their Morphology ............................................................................18 Airship Series ...........................................................................................................18 Alo Series .................................................................................................................21 Altamont Series ........................................................................................................24 Alumrock Series .......................................................................................................26 Aptos Series .............................................................................................................29 Aquic Xerorthents, Bay Mud Substratum .................................................................32 Argixerolls ................................................................................................................34 Bayshore Taxadjunct ................................................................................................35 Ben Lomond Series ..................................................................................................37 Bonnydoon Series ....................................................................................................40 Botella Series ...........................................................................................................41 Campbell Series .......................................................................................................43 Caninecreek Series ..................................................................................................46 Casrock Series .........................................................................................................49 Catelli Series ............................................................................................................52 Clear Lake Series .....................................................................................................53 Climara Series ..........................................................................................................55 Cropley Series ..........................................................................................................57 Cumulic Haloxerolls .................................................................................................60 Diablo Series ............................................................................................................63 Elder Series .............................................................................................................64 Elkhorn Series ..........................................................................................................67 Elpaloalto Series ......................................................................................................69 Elsman Series ..........................................................................................................71 Embarcadero Series ................................................................................................75 Felton Series ............................................................................................................78 Flaskan Series .........................................................................................................82 Footpath Series ........................................................................................................85 Gaviota Series ..........................................................................................................87 Gilroy Series .............................................................................................................88 iii Hangerone Series ....................................................................................................89
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impacts of Early Land-Use on Streams of the Santa Cruz Mountains: Implications for Coho Salmon Recovery
    Impacts of early land-use on streams of the Santa Cruz Mountains: implications for coho salmon recovery San Lorenzo Valley Museum collection Talk Outline • Role of San Lorenzo River in coho salmon recovery • History of 19th century land-use practices • How these disturbances impacted (and still impact) ecosystem function and salmon habitat Central California Coast ESU Lost Coast – Navarro Pt. Coho salmon Diversity Strata Navarro Pt. – Gualala Pt. Coastal San Francisco Bay Santa Cruz Mountains Watersheds with historical records of Coho Salmon Dependent populations Tunitas Independent populations San Gregorio Pescadero Gazos Waddell Scott San Vicente Laguna Soquel San Lorenzo Aptos Land-use activities: 1800-1905 Logging: the early years • Pit and whipsaw era (pre-1842) – spatially limited, low demand – impacts relatively minor • Water-powered mills (1842-1875) – Demand fueled by Gold Rush – Mills cut ~5,000 board ft per day = 10 whip sawyers – Annual cut 1860 = ~10 million board ft • Steam-powered mills (1876-1905) – Circular saws doubled rate to ~10,000 board ft/day x 3-10 saws – Year-round operation (not dependent on water) – Annual cut 1884 = ~34 million board ft – Exhausted timber supply Oxen team skidding log on corduroy road (Mendocino Co. ca 1851) Krisweb.com Oxen team hauling lumber at Oil Creek Mill San Lorenzo Valley Museum collection oldoregonphotos.com San Vicente Lumber Company (ca 1908): steam donkey & rail line Santa Cruz Museum of Art & History Loma Prieta Mill, Mill Pond, and Rail Line (ca 1888) Santa Cruz Museum of Art & History The Saw-Dust Nuisance “We have always maintained that lumberman dumping their refuse timber and saw-dust into the San Lorenzo River and its tributaries were committing a nuisance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fault Line Threatening Dams
    The Fault Line Threatening Dams The Fault Line Threatening Dams Deficient structures, earthquake risks raise possibility of potentially catastrophic flooding By Jim Carlton June 24, 2017 FREMONT, Calif.-The coastal mountains that frame this working-class city next to San Francisco Bay harbor a hidden menace: a reservoir 10 miles away that sits next to an active earthquake fault, which experts say could cause a dam break and flood thousands of homes. The potential threat is so severe, the owner of the Calaveras Reservoir decided to build a replacement dam. But seven years after that work began, the dam is unfinished and isn't expected to be complete until 2019 -- four years behind schedule. The issues hampering the Calaveras Reservoir project show how difficult it can be to repair or replace an old dam, which is of growing concern nationally. An estimated 27,380 dams, or 30% of the 90,580 listed in the latest 2016 National Inventory of Dams, are rated as posing a high or significant hazard. Of those, more than 2,170 are considered deficient and in need of upgrading, according to a report by the American Society of Civil Engineers. The inventory by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers doesn't break out which ones are deficient. But funding and inspection staffing are considered inadequate, the civil engineers' report said. An estimated $64 billion is needed to upgrade those dams, including $22 billion for those posing the highest hazard, according to the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, a nonprofit group in Lexington, Ky. "It's a huge problem with limited resources," said Ivan Wong, a consulting seismologist from Walnut Creek, Calif., who works on dam projects nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
    [Show full text]
  • 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California
    1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California Prepared for: Premia Capital, LLC 801 Hamilton Street Redwood City, CA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. January 18, 2019 1180 MAIN STREET PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT, REDWOOD CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This document entitled 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California was prepared by Stantec Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Premia Capital, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Joanne Grant, Archaeologist, MA, RPA Reviewed by (signature) John A. Nadolski, M.A. Approved
    [Show full text]
  • JUNTOS Initiative
    7/9/2020 Print/Preview Powered by ZoomGrants™ Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority 2020 Urban Grant Program Deadline: 7/1/2020 Santa Clara County Public Health Department JUNTOS Initiative Jump to: Project Description Documents Upload $ 199,955.00 Requested Santa Clara County Public Health Department Submitted: 6/30/2020 11:43:58 AM Telephone408-817-6881 (Pacific) 1775 Story Road, Suite 120 Fax 408-251-4014 San Jose, CA 95122 Web www.sccphd.org Project Contact EIN 94-6000533 Michelle Wexler Senior Health Care Program [email protected] Manager Tel: 408-817-6881 Bonnie Broderick [email protected] Additional Contacts none entered Project Description top Applicant Type 1. What type of organization is this? ✔ Public Agency School or School District 501(c)3 Nonprofit Eligible organization acting as Fiscal Sponsor for another organization 2. Does the application include a fiscal sponsor? If the project includes a fiscal sponsor, the fiscal sponsor must be the applicant. YES ✔ NO Overview https://www.zoomgrants.com/printprop.asp?rfpidu=EAFEEA1775E740ADA668DE61AB8BC94A&propidu=1827D0E2B10C428BBA75DF3417C12D24 1/13 7/9/2020 Print/Preview 3. Which type of grant are you requesting? Small ($10,000 - $39,999) ✔ Large ($40,000 - $250,000) 4. Grant category (check all that apply) Environmental Stewardship and Restoration Parks, Trails, and Public Access ✔ Environmental Education ✔ Urban Agriculture / Food Systems 5. Type of project (check all that apply) Capital improvement (Large projects only) Planning ✔ Program 6. Project Location: Address / Neighborhood What is the physical location of the project? If there is no physical location, please enter "N/A." If the project will be in multiple locations, please list all.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency Board Policy Committee Meeting
    May 16, 2019 – Agenda Item #9G BAY AREA WATER SUPPLY AND CONSERVATION AGENCY BOARD POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING May 10, 2019 Correspondence and media coverage of interest between April 15 and May 9, 2019 Correspondence Date: May 3, 2019 From: San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Subject: Press Release: SFPUC Celebrates Completion of Calaveras Dam Replacement Project Date: April 29, 2019 From: Office of Governor Gavin Newsom Subject Press Advisory: Governor Newsom Directs State Agencies to Prepare Water Resilience Portfolio for California Media Coverage Water Supply: Date: May 6, 2019 Source: Sacramento Bee Article: To prevent water shortages, California must embrace desalination Date: May 2, 2019 Source: Mercury News Article: Sierra snowpack is 188 percent of normal Date: May 2, 2019 Source: Maven’s Notebook Article: Final Phillips Survey of 2019 Finds Healthy Late-Spring Snowpack Water Infrastructure: Date: May 5, 2019 Source: Mercury News Article: Editorial: Governor sets welcome new course on Delta water issues Date: May 4, 2019 Source: Grist Article: The town that extended ‘smart growth’ to its water Date: May 2, 2019 Source: SF Gate Article: California governor makes big change to giant water project Date: May 2, 2019 Source: Mercury News Article: Newsom officially kills Jerry Brown’s Delta Twin Tunnels project Date: May 2, 2019 Source: Maven’s Notebook Article: State Withdraws WaterFix Approvals, Initiates Planning and Permitting for a Smaller Single Tunnel May 16, 2019 – Agenda Item #9G Water Infrastructure, cont’d.: Date: May
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Ghost Towns in the Santa Cruz Mountains
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University GSP Projects Student and Alumni Works Fall 12-2020 Mapping Ghost Towns in the Santa Cruz Mountains Sarah Christine Brewer Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/gspproject Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Geographic Information Sciences Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Brewer, Sarah Christine, "Mapping Ghost Towns in the Santa Cruz Mountains" (2020). GSP Projects. 1. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/gspproject/1 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Student and Alumni Works at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in GSP Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mapping Ghost Towns in the Santa Cruz Mountains GSP 510 Final Project BY: SARAH BREWER DECEMBER 2020 Abstract This project identifies areas of archaeological sensitivity for historic resources related to the segment of the South Pacific Coast Railroad that spanned from Los Gatos to Glenwood in the steep terrain of the Santa Cruz Mountains in Central California. The rail line was only in use for 60 years (1880-1940) until the completion of a major highway drew travelers to greater automobile use. During the construction and operation of the rail line, small towns sprouted at the railroad stops, most of which were abandoned along with the rail line in 1940. Some of these towns are now inundated by reservoirs. This project maps the abandoned rail line and “ghost towns” by using ArcGIS Pro (version 2.5.1) to digitize the railway, wagon roads, and structures shown on a georeferenced topographic quadrangle created in 1919 (Marshall et al., 1919).
    [Show full text]
  • Diocese of San Jose 2020 Directory
    Diocese of San Jose 2020 Directory 1150 North First Street, Suite 100 San Jose, California 95112 Phone (408) 983-0100 www.dsj.org updated 10/8/2020 1 2 Table of Contents Diocese Page 5 Chancery Office Page 15 Deaneries Page 29 Churches Page 43 Schools Page 163 Clergy & Religious Page 169 Organizations Page 205 Appendix 1 Page A-1 Appendix 2 Page A-15 3 4 Pope Francis Bishop of Rome Jorge Mario Bergoglio was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina's capital city, on December 17, 1936. He studied and received a master's degree in chemistry at the University of Buenos Aires, but later decided to become a Jesuit priest and studied at the Jesuit seminary of Villa Devoto. He studied liberal arts in Santiago, Chile, and in 1960 earned a degree in philosophy from the Catholic University of Buenos Aires. Between 1964 and 1965 he was a teacher of literature and psychology at Inmaculada High School in the province of Santa Fe, and in 1966 he taught the same courses at the prestigious Colegio del Salvador in Buenos Aires. In 1967, he returned to his theological studies and was ordained a priest on December 13, 1969. After his perpetual profession as a Jesuit in 1973, he became master of novices at the Seminary of Villa Barilari in San Miguel. Later that same year, he was elected superior of the Jesuit province of Argentina and Uruguay. In 1980, he returned to San Miguel as a teacher at the Jesuit school, a job rarely taken by a former provincial superior.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-11-08-HA-FEA-Connections-Charter-School
    Final Environmental Assessment For the CONNECTIONS PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL MASTER PLAN Kaumana, South Hilo, Hawai‘i Tax Map Key: (3)2-5-006:141 Prepared for: Connections Public Charter School 174 Kamehameha Avenue Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720 Prepared by: Wil Chee – Planning & Environmental October 2010 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Connections Public Charter School, Kaumana, South Hilo, Hawaii Table of Contents ACRONYMS...............................................................................................................................................................iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................1 1.1 PROJECT PROFILE ........................................................................................................................................1 1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................................2 1.2.1 Revised Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) ..........................................................................................2 1.3 SCOPE AND AUTHORITY ..............................................................................................................................3 1.4 PROPOSED ACTION......................................................................................................................................3 1.5 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION .......................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Conifer Communities of the Santa Cruz Mountains and Interpretive
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ CALIFORNIA CONIFERS: CONIFER COMMUNITIES OF THE SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAINS AND INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE FOR THE UCSC ARBORETUM AND BOTANIC GARDEN A senior internship project in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS in ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES by Erika Lougee December 2019 ADVISOR(S): Karen Holl, Environmental Studies; Brett Hall, UCSC Arboretum ABSTRACT: There are 52 species of conifers native to the state of California, 14 of which are endemic to the state, far more than any other state or region of its size. There are eight species of coniferous trees native to the Santa Cruz Mountains, but most people can only name a few. For my senior internship I made a set of ten interpretive signs to be installed in front of California native conifers at the UCSC Arboretum and wrote an associated paper describing the coniferous forests of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Signs were made using the Arboretum’s laser engraver and contain identification and collection information, habitat, associated species, where to see local stands, and a fun fact or two. While the physical signs remain a more accessible, kid-friendly format, the paper, which will be available on the Arboretum website, will be more scientific with more detailed information. The paper will summarize information on each of the eight conifers native to the Santa Cruz Mountains including localized range, ecology, associated species, and topics pertaining to the species in current literature. KEYWORDS: Santa Cruz, California native plants, plant communities, vegetation types, conifers, gymnosperms, environmental interpretation, UCSC Arboretum and Botanic Garden I claim the copyright to this document but give permission for the Environmental Studies department at UCSC to share it with the UCSC community.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places I ] §Gp Registration Form I
    (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places I ] §gp Registration Form i • _ _„_....—•- This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. ?See instructions in Hovy to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete eaihJtem by marking"x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicaole." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property________________________________________RELt^Fn/r''!^ historic name Alviso, Jose Maria, Adob°—————————————— other names/site number CA-SC1 -15? ___________________ 2. Location street & number Q? P-jprfmnnt- Pnari ___________________________ G not for publication city or town Mi Ip-it-ac;_____________________________________ D vicinity state ______rj=n -ifn-rnia code CA county fianivi ria-ra_____ code ngc; zip code 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, 1 hereby certify that this^Q nomination Q request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property S3 meetdlO does not meet the National Register criteria 1 recommend that this property be considered significant d nationally £H stat§wid^ Q/tocally.
    [Show full text]
  • Students by Zip Code of Residence As of Jan 20, 2006 (Job Corps Excluded)
    De Anza College Winter 2006 Students By Zip Code of Residence As of Jan 20, 2006 (Job Corps Excluded) ZIP City Neighborhood HC % 95014 Cupertino 2,269 11.6% 94087 Sunnyvale Sunnyvale Bordering Cupertino 1,339 6.8% 95129 San Jose West West San Jose 990 5.0% 95051 Santa Clara 863 4.4% 94086 Sunnyvale Sunnyvale Middle 788 4.0% 95123 San Jose East of 880 Blossom Hill 659 3.4% 95035 Milpitas 557 2.8% unknown unknown unknown 498 2.5% 95008 Campbell 474 2.4% 95136 San Jose East of 880 Capitol Expwy 447 2.3% 95132 San Jose East of 880 Berryessa 436 2.2% 95117 San Jose West Winchester 414 2.1% 95111 San Jose East of 880 San Jose East of 880 408 2.1% 95124 San Jose East of 880 North of Los Gatos 406 2.1% 95050 Santa Clara 397 2.0% 95148 San Jose East of 880 Quimby 386 2.0% 95112 San Jose East of 880 San Jose East of 880 346 1.8% 95118 San Jose East of 880 San Jose East of 880 329 1.7% 95070 Saratoga West Valley College Area 327 1.7% 95127 San Jose East of 880 Alum Rock 327 1.7% 95120 San Jose East of 880 Almaden 326 1.7% 95122 San Jose East of 880 Tully 308 1.6% 95128 San Jose West Fruitdale/Valley Fair 305 1.6% 95121 San Jose East of 880 Yerba Buena 296 1.5% 95125 San Jose East of 880 Willow Glen 293 1.5% 95131 San Jose East of 880 Oakland 286 1.5% 95133 San Jose East of 880 McKee 277 1.4% 94085 Sunnyvale 271 1.4% 94040 Mountain View 262 1.3% 94089 Sunnyvale Sunnyvale North 255 1.3% 94043 Mountain View 236 1.2% 95116 San Jose East of 880 San Jose East of 880 235 1.2% 95126 San Jose East of 880 W San Carlos 223 1.1% 95130 San Jose West West San
    [Show full text]