Sustainability Report We're Reducing Our Climate Impact for Long-Term

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainability Report We're Reducing Our Climate Impact for Long-Term Sustainability Report SAS welcomes an open debate about aviation and the environment. On the basis of scientific findings we will present a nuanced picture of the airlines’ actual environmental impact and help ensure a competition- neutral policy framework. Important events in 2009 COP15 concluded with the “Copenhagen Accord,” a political goal of a maximum temperature rise of two degrees Celsius. SAS and IATA were active in the process. IATA and the aviation industry agreed on specific and relative targets for reducing greenhouse emissions. SAS’s MRV (Monitoring–Reporting–Verifying) plan, which represents the basis for calculating carbon dioxide and tonne kilometers for the EU ETS, was approved. SAS’s climate index improved by four points to 93 (97). Blue1 was certified and Cargo recertified according to ISO 14001. SAS stepped up its environmental communication internally and externally. The phasing out of older aircraft resulted in a substantial improvement in the fleet’s total environmental performance. Sustainability-related KPIs1 2009 20082 2007 Operating revenue, MSEK 44,918 52,870 50,598 EBT before non-recurring items, MSEK –1,754 –339 1,234 EBT margin before non-recurring items, % –3.9 0.6 2.4 Average number of employees 18,786 24,635 26,5383 of which women, % 45 42 413 Sick leave, % 6.9 6.5 6.43 Climate index 4 93 97 95 Carbon dioxide (CO2), emissions, 1,000 tonnes 3,784 5,840 6,295 Nitrogen oxides (NOX), emissions, 1,000 tonnes 15.0 24.2 25.6 Grams of carbon dioxide (CO2)/RPK 127 129 130 Total fuel consumption, 1,000 tonnes 1,208 1,857 1,999 Fuel consumption, liter/RTK 0.46 0.47 0.48 Water consumption, 1,000 m3 175 176 2083 Energy consumption, ground, GWh 207 213 2093 Unsorted waste, 1,000 tonnes 1.5 0.9 1.03 External environment-related costs, MSEK 368 453 414 Number of passengers, 1,000 5 27,382 41,741 44,772 1 We’re reducing our climate impact for All financial key data follow the financial portion of the Annual Report. Wherever possible, all sustainability KPIs include operations owned during the reporting year. 2 Apart for average number of employees, all key data for 2008 exclude airBaltic. 3 Data have not been examined by an external auditor. 4 The climate index has been corrected in the Internet version and thus departs from long-term, responsible traffic growth the index in the print version. 5 Including paying, bonus and charter passengers 102 and non revenue passengers. SAS Group Sustainability Report 2009 Aviation sector a key player at UN climate conference Our world – our stakeholders In 2006 the airline industry began to examine industry positions on being included in the European emissions trading scheme. Already then advantages were identified of seeking global SAS’s activities include flight operations and ope- During the period 2008-09 SAS reduced its capacity by 15%, solutions to avoid competition-distorting rules rations on the ground. Actual flights account for the resulting in an increase in the passenger load factor from 72.3 to and purely regional systems. 72.7% in 2009. IATA estimates that demand fell by around 8% in At the end of 2008/beginning of 2009, SAS invited the IATA and biggest environmental impact by far, yet ground ope- a number of industry players to attend the World Business Summit 2009, with growth picking up again by 2011 at the earliest. rations and onboard customer service also impact the climate conference, held in Copenhagen in May 2009. Subsequently, environment. In 2009 the environmental debate intensified with a contin- IATA was able to present an initial proposal for a global strategy for the ued focus on global emissions of greenhouse gases, primarily airlines’ greenhouse emissions. IATA then obtained industry accept- ance of the strategy ahead of the UN climate summit in New York in carbon dioxide (CO2). There is growing agreement that a consid- SAS believes in sustainable development as a concept both for erable effort is required to limit and eventually reduce emissions. September 2009. Since SAS played a leading role in the process, SAS Group CEO Mats Jansson was one of three airline chiefs tasked with taking responsibility and as way of creating value for sharehold- However, major emitters such as the U.S., China and India have presenting the strategy. In September 2009 the strategy was also ers. Continuously improving processes and optimizing produc- difficulty reaching a consensus on specific targets and a time- presented at a preparatory climate conference, Nordic Climate Solu- tion in a sustainable way creates value, not only in the form of table for taking action. See also the report from COP15 at right. tions, in Copenhagen. SAS was a “greening partner” at both the World growth for shareholders but also for outside stakeholders, sup- Business Summit and Nordic Climate Solutions. During the year, global pliers and passengers. To communicate these efforts and their On the way to zero emissions industry organizations for airports, air traffic management and aircraft results, SAS strives to continue to be a leader in sustainability In 2007 the industry organization IATA formulated a vision and engine manufacturers also endorsed IATA’s global strategy. This means that the global aviation industry stands united on com- reporting, work that is propelled by the demands of the outside whereby it will be possible to fly commercially without impact- mon goals, a situation, by the way, that is unique in the world, since no world and by the expectations of stakeholders. ing the climate by 2050. This vision is to be realized through a other global industry had succeeded in agreeing in this way, ahead of The airline industry is sensitive to outside disruptions. These combination of new technology, more efficient air traffic manage- COP15. ICAO, the UN civil aviation body, held a meeting prior to the have been amplified during the most recent decade, with the ment, new fuels and measures to improve infrastructure and climate conference where environmental issues topped the agenda. market affected by cyclical fluctuations, acts of terrorism, war other external conditions under which the airlines operate. Despite initial differences, during COP15 it became clear that ICAO and the aviation industry are largely in agreement on basic principles. and the current financial crisis. At the same time, competition is Realizing zero emissions requires the total replacement of increasing, which puts additional pressure on falling margins in a existing aircraft fleets with a new generation of aircraft not yet in Conclusion: less than two degrees labor- and capital-intensive industry. production. The lead time for such a changeover is 20-30 years, Following serious problems reaching agreement in the negotiations SAS’s long-term objectives remain firm, and reporting of sus- which is why the vision of zero emissions should be interpreted to among 192 countries, the world had to settle for the final report, the tainability work is to maintain the same high standards that have mean that the necessary technology is to be commercially avail- “Copenhagen Accord”. Despite the lack of targets and plans, it is how- been garnering praise for SAS from sustainability analysts and able and adopted by the airlines at a financially proper pace. ever, positive that COP15 resulted in a political pledge to keep the global temperature increase under two degrees Celsius. Moreover, almost all other outside commentators. On the way to this vision, IATA and the rest of the aviation countries in the world endorsed the declaration to establish and report industry agreed on joint recommendations and a target scenario national targets. Market performance ahead of the COP15 climate conference: While aviation was on the policy agenda at the summit, it was not The airline industry is now seeing lower demand from business included in any agreement. In the short term this may be seen as an ad- Improving energy efficiency by an average of 1.5% per year travelers in particular, the most important segment for the estab- vantage, since aviation avoided the tax measures that many countries until 2020. had proposed, but a more long-term assessment is that a clarification lished network carriers. would have been best, preferably in the form of a global framework for Carbon-neutral growth starting in 2020. This has led to greater competition and increasing pressure regulating aviation. 50% reduction in greenhouse CO emissions by 2050, on fares, affecting margins and profitability for the entire indus- 2 try. At the same time, substantial capacity has been mothballed, compared with 2005 levels. Intensive industry collaboration and many airlines have put new investment on hold. ACARE (Advisory Council for Aeronautical Research in Europe) During the entire COP15, SAS was part of an IATA team, which worked In the long term, however, a continued uptick for the airline has set a goal for developing technology for aircraft, engines and intensively to establish contacts with negotiators and decision-makers from all over the world. The aim was to create a dialog on the needs and industry is expected with average passenger growth of 3-4% per better air traffic management to reduce greenhouse CO emis- We’re reducing our climate impact for 2 requirements of aviation and present the industry’s own recommenda- year. Most of the growth is expected in Asia, primarily in China sions by 50% per revenue passenger kilometer and nitrogen ox- tions. Particular weight was given to industry desires for a global agree- and India, while the mature markets in the industrialized West will ides (NOx) by 80% by no later than 2020. In addition, noise levels ment and for ICAO regulation of airline emissions.
Recommended publications
  • Economic Instruments for Reducing Aircraft Noise Theoretical Framework
    European LCCs going hybrid: An empirical survey Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert and Richard Klophaus Worms University of Applied Sciences, Germany Competence Center Aviation Management (CCAM) Airneth Annual Conference The Hague, April 14, 2011 Agenda • Motivation/Background • Textbook definition of pure/archetypical LCC • Data for empirical survey • Empirical results: Classification of airline’s business models • Conclusions/discussion Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert, Richard Klophaus – European LCCs going hybrid – The Hague, April 14, 2011 2 Motivation / Background • Significant (and still growing) market share of LCCs in Europe. • Obviously different strategies within the LCC segment. • Market observers see trends towards “hybridization” and/or “converging business models”,e.g.: “On many fronts - pricing, product offering, distribution, fleet, network design and even cost structure - the previously obvious and often blatant differences between budget and legacy carriers are now no longer so apparent. This has resulted from the movement of both parties in the same direction, toward the mainstream middle.” Airline Business, May 2009 (emphasis added). Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert, Richard Klophaus – European LCCs going hybrid - The Hague, April 14, 2011 3 Motivation / Background • Dynamic market environment with recent changes, e.g. some LCCs offering transfer flights or can be booked via GDS. • Yet, very limited empirical analysis of “hybridization”. Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert, Richard Klophaus – European LCCs going hybrid - The Hague, April 14, 2011 4 Aim of the paper It is examined • to what extent carriers today blend low-cost characteristics with the business characteristics of traditional full-service airlines, and • which characteristics remain distinct between LCCs and traditional full-service airlines and which tend to be common for all carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Alliance Celebrates 15Th Anniversary Around the World
    6/2012 network STAR ALLIANCE STAR ALLIANCE CELEBRATES 15TH ANNIVERSARY AROUND THE WORLD SEE STORY PAGES 4-7 ...just for employees STAR ALLIANCE The Star Alliance employee website is constantly changing with new information and news added almost daily. If you’re looking for information about the Alliance, it’s one of the best resources around. While you’re online, check into our second website, Star Alliance Connects. It’s a growing networking site that puts you in touch with other employees around the world. Here’s what you’ll find on both sites. THE STAR ALLIANCE EMPLOYEE WEBSITE The 2011 issue of the Reference Guide is also online. The The employee website is a place where you can find just publication houses policies, procedures, airport maps, about anything you need to help you deliver the Alliance’s lounge information and a lot more to help you deliver Star products and services. As well, you’ll find the latest news Alliances services. You can find the current version at from member carriers, publications, photos, videos and a http://www.starallianceemployees.com/reference- lot more. Check out http://www.starallianceemploy- guide.html in both PDF and HTML for easy reference. ees.com/ to stay connected. Under the Publications Tab, The 2012 version is slated for publication this summer. you’ll find our Network publication, poster downloads, the Reference Guide, In Focus (similar to a company STARQUIZ StarQuiz is a fun way to learn about the annual report) and the Products & Services magazine. Alliance. Sign up and see how much you know about As well, you can access news from the site on the new the Alliance, and while you’re at it, try to outsmart almost Star Alliance employees mobile website.
    [Show full text]
  • LOT Polish Airlines – ET Policy
    BULLETIN 19/2008 For: All IATA Agents in BSP Italy Date: 16 Maggio 2008 Subject: LOT Polish Airlines – ET Policy Egregi Agenti, Si prega voler prendere giusta nota che IATA non-è in alcun modo responsabile del contenuto della comunicazione. Per qualsiasi dubbio o chiarimento vi preghiamo voler contattare direttamente la Compagnia Aerea Distinti Saluti, Service Centre Europe International Air Transport Association Service Centre Europe Torre Europa Paseo de la Castellana, 95 28046 Madrid, Spain www.iata.org/europe/cs LOT Polish Airlines S.A. 12 May 2008 Sale of LO (080) documents by IATA Agents on/after 1 June 2008 Dear IATA Agent, We would like to inform you that on/after 1 June 2008 issuance of etix will be possible on the whole LOT network and routes of LOT Interline Electronic Ticketing /IET/ Partner Airlines participating in the carriage. Until today LOT has implemented IET with 69 carriers and further agreements are planned for implementation. Sale of etix is possible in the following GDSs: Amadeus, Galileo, Worldspan, Apollo and Sabre. Current list of LOT Interline Electronic Ticketing Partner Airlines: Adria Airways JP Finnair AY Aeroflot SU Hahn Air HR Air Astana KC Iberia IB Air Baltic BT Icelandair FI Air Berlin AB Japan Airlines Intl JL Air Canada AC Jat Airways JU Air China CA KLM Royal Dutch Airlines KL Air France AF Korean Airlines KE Air Malta KM Lan Airlines LA Air Mauritius MK Lanargentina 4M Air Namibia SW Lanecuador Aerolane SA XL Air New Zealand NZ Lanperu LP Air One AP LTU Intl Airways LT Alitalia AZ Luxair LG All Nippon Airways NH Malev Hungarian Airlines MA American Airlines AA Nacil Air India AI Asiana Airlines OZ Northwest Airlines NW Austrian Airlines OS Qantas Airways QF Belavia B2 Qatar Airways QR Blue1 KF SAS Scandinavian Airlines SK bmi BD Shanghai Airlines FM British Airways BA Singapore Airlines SQ Brussels Airlines SN South African Airways SA Cabo Verde Airlines VR Spanair JK LOT Polish Airlines S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Before Alliances, there was Pan American World Airways . and Trans World Airlines. Before the mega- Alliances, there was interlining, facilitated by IATA Like dogs marking territory, airlines around the world are sniffing each other's tail fins looking for partners." Daniel Riordan “The hardest thing in working on an alliance is to coordinate the activities of people who have different instincts and a different language, and maybe worship slightly different travel gods, to get them to work together in a culture that allows them to respect each other’s habits and convictions, and yet work productively together in an environment in which you can’t specify everything in advance.” Michael E. Levine “Beware a pact with the devil.” Martin Shugrue Airline Motivations For Alliances • the desire to achieve greater economies of scale, scope, and density; • the desire to reduce costs by consolidating redundant operations; • the need to improve revenue by reducing the level of competition wherever possible as markets are liberalized; and • the desire to skirt around the nationality rules which prohibit multinational ownership and cabotage. Intercarrier Agreements · Ticketing-and-Baggage Agreements · Joint-Fare Agreements · Reciprocal Airport Agreements · Blocked Space Relationships · Computer Reservations Systems Joint Ventures · Joint Sales Offices and Telephone Centers · E-Commerce Joint Ventures · Frequent Flyer Program Alliances · Pooling Traffic & Revenue · Code-Sharing Code Sharing The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA carrier designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptair to Join Star Alliance
    2007-10-16 17:07 CEST EgyptAir to join Star Alliance At a joint ceremony held in Cairo today, the Chief Executive Board of Star Alliance has voted to accept EgyptAir as a future member, - Egypt is one of the most important aviation markets in Africa, with a large potential for both business and leisure travel. We are proud that EgyptAir, a world class airline, has chosen to join Star Alliance, thereby recognizing the importance of alliances in aviation today, commented Jaan Albrecht, CEO Star Alliance. - EgyptAir provides an ideal network fit for Star Alliance and will permit many more passengers to experience the alliance's customer benefits especially in markets, in which Star Alliance was up to now under represented, Albrecht continued. In order to implement the Star Alliance "Move under one Roof" concept at Cairo Airport, EgyptAir and the Star Alliance member carriers flying to Cairo will move to the new Terminal 3 once it opens in 2008 Within the integration process now underway, EgyptAir is set to become a full Star Alliance member carrier within the next 18 months. EgyptAir will add nine additional unique airports into Star Alliance network, bringing the overall total to more than 17,700 daily flights serving 944 destinations in 161 countries. (Figures are based on current 17 member carriers and the four carriers set to join soon - Air China, Egypt Air, Shanghai Airlines and Turkish Airlines. EgyptAir was established in May 1932 as the first airline in the Middle East and Africa and the seventh to join IATA. In 2004, EgyptAir demonstrated the scale of its commitment to the highest standards of safety by being the first IOSA certified airline in the Middle East and Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • In Focus - 2011
    IN FOCUS - 2011 AN ANNUAL REVIEW OF STAR ALLIANCE PRODUCTS AND BENEFITS THE WAY THE EARTH CONNECTS 2 A snapshot of the 26 Star Alliance members 3 Total revenue ($US) $168.1 billion Airports served 1,300 Annual passengers 659.6 million Fleet 4,377 Daily departures 20,813 Lounges More than 980 Number of Employees 412,762 Countries served 189 STAR ALLIANCE FLEET NUMBER Of MAJOR HUB MEMBER CARRIERS SIZE EMPLOYEES AIRPORTS Adria Airways (JP) 14 452 Ljubljana Aegean Airlines (A3) 29 2,200 Athens, Thessaloniki, Heraklion, Rhodes, Larnaca Air Canada (AC) 352 26,000 Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Calgary Air China (CA) 282 24,459 Beijing, Chengdu, Shanghai Air New Zealand (NZ) 102 10,800 Auckland, Los Angeles, Hong Kong ANA (NH) 222 33,183 Tokyo, Haneda, Osaka Asiana Airlines (OZ) 71 9,041 Seoul Incheon, Seoul Gimpo Austrian (OS) 81 6,000 Vienna Blue1 (KF) 9 350 Helsinki British Midland International (BD) 60 3,811 London Heathrow Brussels Airlines (SN) 49 3,300 Brussels Croatia Airlines (OU) 13 1,095 Zagreb EGYPTAIR (MS) 75 7,500 Cairo Ethiopian Airlines (ET) 48 5,635 Addis Ababa, Lome LOT Polish Airlines (LO) 54 2,887 Warsaw Lufthansa (LH) 419 37,689 Frankfurt, Munich Scandinavian Airlines (SK) 136 12,883 Copenhagen, Oslo, Stockholm Singapore Airlines (SQ) 105 13,588 Singapore Changi South African Airways (SA) 55 9,223 Johannesburg SWISS (LX) 89 7,641 Zurich, Geneva, Basel TAM (JJ) 154 29,000 São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasilia TAP Portugal (TP) 71 7,055 Lisbon, Porto Thai Airways Intl (TG) 89 24,563 Bangkok, Chiang Mai, Phuket, Hat Yai Turkish
    [Show full text]
  • Case No COMP/M.3770 - LUFTHANSA / SWISS
    EN Case No COMP/M.3770 - LUFTHANSA / SWISS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(2) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 04/07/2005 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3770 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 04.07.2005 SG-Greffe(2005) D/202898 In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article PUBLIC VERSION 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are MERGER PROCEDURE shown thus […]. Where possible the information ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. To the notifying party Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Case No COMP/M.3770- Lufthansa/Swiss Notification of 20.05.2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 139/20041 1. On 20 May 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking Deutsche Lufthansa AG (“Lufthansa”, Germany), the holding company of the Lufthansa Group, acquires control of the whole of Swiss International Air Lines Ltd (“Swiss”, Switzerland), by way of purchase of shares. 2. Given the bilateral Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (the “ATA”)2, the Commission has exceptionally full jurisdiction to assess potential competition concerns in Switzerland and, in particular, any concerns on routes between Switzerland and third countries under Article 11(1) of the ATA.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Alliance
    Star Alliance Star Alliance is the world's largest global airline alliance.[2] Star Alliance Founded on 14 May 1997, its current CEO is Jeffrey Goh[4] and its headquarters is located in Frankfurt am Main, Germany.[3] As of April 2018, Star Alliance is the largest of the three global alliances by passenger count with 762.27 million, ahead of both SkyTeam (630 million) and Oneworld (528 million).[5][6] Its Launch date 14 May 1997 slogan is "The Way the Earth Connects". Full members 26 Star Alliance's 26 member airlines operate a fleet of approximately Non-voting members 40 affiliates 5,033 aircraft, serving more than 1,290 airports in 195 countries Pending members 0 on more than 19,000 daily departures. The alliance has a two-tier Destination airports 1,294[1] rewards program, Silver and Gold, with incentives including [2] priority boarding and upgrades. Like other airline alliances, Star Destination countries 195 Alliance airlines share airport terminals (known as co-location) Annual passengers (M) 762[2] and many member planes are painted in the alliance's livery. Annual RPK (G) 1,739[1] Fleet size 5,033[1] Contents Headquarters Frankfurt am Main, Germany[3] Management Jeffrey Goh, CEO[4] History Calin Rovinescu, Chairman 1997–1999: First alliance Alliance slogan The Way the Earth Connects. Additions 2000–2006: Expansion Website www.staralliance.com (http://w 2007: First decade ww.staralliance.com) 2008–2010: Second decade of operations 2011–present: further expansion and stability Member airlines and affiliates Members and affiliates
    [Show full text]
  • BIO Juha Järvinen
    BIO Juha Järvinen Mr. Juha Järvinen, b. 1976, MBA joined Finnair in 2012 as Managing Director of Finnair Cargo. He has worked in aviation industry for 17 years and has extensive experience in airline sales and marketing, commercial operations, airport operations and air cargo. Prior to joining Finnair Juha Järvinen held several position within SAS Group in Sweden, Finland, Estonia and the UK, most recently as VP International Airport Operations in Stockholm. Mr. Järvinen has studied leisure and tourism management in London Metropolitan University Business School and he has MBA in transport and logistics management and aviation from Danube University in Austria. Mr. Järvinen is a member of Finnair Management Board. Since 2013, he is also a member of the Logistics Commission of Confederation of Finnish Industries (EK) in Helsinki. His past positions of trust include Board memberships in SAS EuroBonus Loyalty Program, Stockholm - 2009-2011, Star Alliance Management Board, Frankfurt – 2010-2011 and Finland Convention Bureau, Helsinki – 2010-2011. Past positions: SAS Scandinavian Airlines – Stockholm, Sweden Vice President International Airport Operations Period: May 2011 – May 2012 SAS Group - Blue1 - Helsinki, Finland Chief Commercial Officer / Vice President Commercial Period: August 2007 - April 2011 SAS Ground Services Finland Ltd - Helsinki, Finland Managing Director & Area Airport Manager SAS Northeast Europe Period: May 2006 – July 2007 SAS Group - Blue Travel Services Estonia Ltd - Tallinn, Estonia Managing Director / General Manager Period: November 2002 – April 2006 SAS Scandinavian Airlines - Helsinki, Finland Manager Direct Sales Support & Development – Region North East Europe Period: April 2002 – November 2002 SAS Scandinavian Airlines - Helsinki, Finland Direct Sales Supervisor Finland Period: December 2000 – April 2002 SAS Scandinavian Airlines - London, UK Senior Telephone Sales & Servicing Agent Period: June 1998 – December 2000 .
    [Show full text]
  • SAS Group Sustainability Report 2005 English
    Welcome aboard SAS Group Annual Report & Sustainability Report 2005 Contents The SAS Group 1 Business areas 27 Financial report 54 Results for the year 2 Scandinavian Airlines Businesses 27 Report by the Board of Directors 54 Important events 3 Scandinavian Airlines Danmark 30 The SAS Group President’s comments 4 SAS Braathens 31 - Statement of income, incl. comments 57 Turnaround 2005 fully implemented 6 Scandinavian Airlines Sverige 32 - Summary statement of income 58 Business concept, vision, objectives & values 7 Scandinavian Airlines International 33 - Balance sheet, incl. comments 59 The SAS Group’s strategies & Operational key figures, ten-year overview 34 - Change in shareholders’ equity 60 management model 8 - Cash flow statement, incl. comments 61 The SAS Group’s brand portfolio 9 Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 35 - Accounting and valuation policies 62 New business model & greater Spanair 38 - Notes and supplemental information 65 customer value 10 Widerøe 39 Parent Company SAS AB, statement of income The SAS Group’s markets & growth 12 Blue1 40 and balance sheet, cash flow statement, Analysis of the SAS Group’s competitors 13 airBaltic 41 change in shareholders’ equity and notes 82 Alliances 14 Estonian Air 42 Proposed disposition of earnings 84 Quality, safety & business processes 15 Auditors’ Report 84 Airline Support Businesses 43 SAS Ground Services 44 The capital market SAS Technical Services 45 Corporate governance 85 & Investor Relations 17 SAS Cargo Group 46 Corporate Governance Report 85 Share data 18 - Legal structure
    [Show full text]
  • Before the U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, D.C
    BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C. Application of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC OPENSKIES SAS IBERIA LÍNEAS AÉREAS DE ESPAÑA, S.A. Docket DOT-OST-2008-0252- FINNAIR OYJ AER LINGUS GROUP DAC under 49 U.S.C. §§ 41308 and 41309 for approval of and antitrust immunity for proposed joint business agreement JOINT MOTION TO AMEND ORDER 2010-7-8 FOR APPROVAL OF AND ANTITRUST IMMUNITY FOR AMENDED JOINT BUSINESS AGREEMENT Communications about this document should be addressed to: For American Airlines: For Aer Lingus, British Airways, and Stephen L. Johnson Iberia: Executive Vice President – Corporate Kenneth P. Quinn Affairs Jennifer E. Trock R. Bruce Wark Graham C. Keithley Vice President and Deputy General BAKER MCKENZIE LLP Counsel 815 Connecticut Ave. NW Robert A. Wirick Washington, DC 20006 Managing Director – Regulatory and [email protected] International Affairs [email protected] James K. Kaleigh [email protected] Senior Antitrust Attorney AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. Laurence Gourley 4333 Amon Carter Blvd. General Counsel Fort Worth, Texas 76155 AER LINGUS GROUP DESIGNATED [email protected] ACTIVITY COMPANY (DAC) [email protected] Dublin Airport [email protected] P.O. Box 180 Dublin, Ireland Daniel M. Wall Richard Mendles Michael G. Egge General Counsel, Americas Farrell J. Malone James B. Blaney LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Senior Counsel, Americas 555 11th St., NW BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC Washington, D.C. 20004 2 Park Avenue, Suite 1100 [email protected] New York, NY 10016 [email protected] [email protected] Antonio Pimentel Alliances Director For Finnair: IBERIA LÍNEAS AÉREAS DE ESPAÑA, Sami Sareleius S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • SAS “New” Business Model
    SAS “new” business model David Sörhammar Uppsala University Department of Business Studies Sweden [email protected] Anna Bengtson Uppsala University Keywords: dynamics, market change, marketing practice, SAS. Abstract In September 2005 SAS introduced a new business model. Where did the model come from and what influenced it? This paper’s focus is on the making of the model where we study the making of a business model as a dynamic process through time. In concrete terms, traces of today’s model can be found and examined from the SAS group’s embryonic attempts starting in 1946, through the financially good years during the 1980s, to the market re-regulation in contemporary time. During these years several changes have taken part both on the larger air travel market and in SAS´s market practice. We have separated SAS´s history into three era’s, the technological era, the businessman’s airlines era, and the “to serve Europe with air travel” era. Elaborating on the theoretical notion of mutuality between markets and market practice (Cf. Helgesson et. al., 2004), the impact of these practices and of the market infra structure at different points in time are described and their importance for the emergence of the business model discussed. Our findings show that the political efforts to de-regulate the European air travel markets did not automatically change all market practices and thus not the market. The process that followed the de-regulation can better be characterised as a translation process in which a changed market was created, based on an already established network of embedded material and immaterial items, such as booking systems, airplanes and perceptive frames, that had to be taken into consideration.
    [Show full text]