DOCSLIB.ORG

I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project Project Review Workshop Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project Project Review Workshop Final Report Prepared for: Oregon Department of Transportation Lead Author: Brian Bombardier, PE Prepared By: HDR Engineering, Inc. Workshop Date: May 7-8, 2018 Table of Contents Project Review ........................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ................................................................................................................. 1 Workshop Objective ............................................................................................................... 1 Project Review Workshop Agenda .............................................................................................. 2 Project Review Workshop Sign-In Sheet ..................................................................................... 4 Attendee Biographies ................................................................................................................. 5 Workshop Materials .................................................................................................................... 8 Workshop Kickoff Presentation ............................................................................................... 8 Project Briefing ....................................................................................................................... 8 Potential Projects Risks and Issues ......................................................................................... 8 Initial Construction Schedule Review .....................................................................................10 Base Cost Estimate Review ....................................................................................................10 Risk Assessment Overview ....................................................................................................12 Risk Elicitation and Mitigation Discussions .............................................................................13 Construction Schedule and Phasing Refinements ..................................................................15 DBE and OJT Project Considerations .....................................................................................16 List of Figures Figure 1 – Initial Workshop Construction Schedule ....................................................................11 Figure 2 - Qualitative Risk Index Values ....................................................................................12 Figure 3 - Top Cost Risk Factors for the I-5 Rose Quarter Construction Project ........................14 Figure 4 - Top Schedule Risk Factors for the I-5 Rose Quarter Construction Project .................15 Figure 5 - Final Workshop Construction Schedule ......................................................................17 List of Appendices Appendix A – Agenda Overview Presentation Appendix B – Project Briefing Presentation Appendix C – Risk Assessment Presentation Appendix D – Risk Management Plan Appendix E – Final Gantt Construction Schedule I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project Page | i Project Review Workshop Report Workshop May 7-8, 2018 Project Review Project Description The I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project (Project) is located in Portland, Oregon, along the 1.8- mile segment of Interstate 5 (I-5) between Interstate 405 (I-405) to the north (milepost 303.2) and Interstate 84 (I-84) to the south (milepost 301.5). The Project also includes the interchange of I-5 and Northeast (NE) Broadway and NE Weidler Streets (the Broadway/Weidler interchange) and the surrounding transportation network, from approximately NE Hancock Street to the north, North Benton Street to the west, NE Multnomah Street to the south, and NE Second Avenue to the east. The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT or the Agency) is in the process of completing an Environmental Assessment (“EA”) for the project to meet the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) requirements. The majority of funding for design and construction of the project was recently authorized by the Oregon Legislature via House Bill 2017. As a result, this project is rapidly moving forward with a project purpose defined to improve safety and operations on I-5 within the project limits and to improve local connectivity and multimodal access across I-5. The project need focuses on safety and operations of the system to promote travel reliability. Workshop Objective Due to the complexity of the project, the number of stakeholders, and the aggressive project schedule, ODOT elected to hold a facilitated project review workshop on May 7-8, 2018 with industry contractors and key technical Agency staff to: 1. Review and provide input on construction staging/phasing. 2. Provide feedback on construction schedule durations and logic. 3. Review and define project risks. I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project 1 Project Review Workshop Report Workshop May 7-8, 2018 Project Review Workshop Agenda I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project 2 Project Review Workshop Report Workshop May 7-8, 2018 I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project 3 Project Review Workshop Report Workshop May 7-8, 2018 Project Review Workshop Sign-In Sheet I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project 4 Project Review Workshop Report Workshop May 7-8, 2018 Attendee Biographies Bruce Johnson, M.S., P.E. Bruce Johnson is the State Bridge Engineer, Bridge Engineering Section, for ODOT since September 2004. He supervises 8 people and oversees the work of 70 people in bridge design, standards, operations, inspection, major bridge maintenance, load rating, bridge management, and preservation. Prior to that, he was the Division Bridge Engineer, for Federal Highway Administration in Oregon from October 1988 to September 2004. He worked in various positions with FHWA in Oregon, Nevada, Kansas, Colorado, Indiana, and Iowa from 1975-1988. Bruce is chair of AASHTO SCOBS Technical Committee T-9 on Bridge Preservation and Chair of the TRB Expert Task Group for the FHWA Long Term Bridge Program. He is a member of ASCE, fib, ASBI, NFPA, and the Underground Construction Association of the Society of Mining and Excavation. Joe Squire, M.S., P.E. Joe Squire is the State Construction & Materials Engineer for ODOT. A Las Vegas, Nevada native and a licensed Professional Civil Engineer, Squire earned a Bachelor's degree in Geology and a Master's degree in Hydrogeology from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Squire started his career in the gold mining industry where he was responsible for heavy earth moving operations and production. Subsequent to mining, Squire joined major Nevada utility as an environmental manager. Later, his career took him into geotechnical and materials consulting in Nevada and Idaho. Squire joined ODOT in 2002. With ODOT, he has served in a various roles including Geo-hydro Manager; Technical Center Manager, Construction Project Manager, and District Manager. Doug Stanley, P.E. Doug Stanley is ODOT Region 1 Roadway Design Lead. Stanley served as a senior specifications engineer and the ODOT Region 1 interim Roadway manager. Prior to joining ODOT, Stanley worked for the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) in a number of roles including Contract Specifications and Structural Design Supervisor. As SDOT’s structural design supervisor, Stanley participated in initial scoping and Cost Estimating Validation Process for the replacement of the Alaskan Way Seawall and Viaduct replacement. Joe Wolf Joe Wolf is ODOT’s Design QA Eng./ Cost Estimator Technical Services. Wolf graduated from Oregon State University in Business Management and Wood Science Engineering. Wolf worked for Slayden Construction for 6 years delivering two Design-Build Projects, OR38 and Knowles Creek, two CMGC projects (Willamette River Bridge - roles included project engineer then as PM for Slayden Construction which was a joint venture with Hamilton Construction - and Sellwood Bridge – roles included access, temporary shoring, work bridge, cofferdam preliminary design, and scheduler for the project along with other operational duties). Wolf was Slayden’s lead estimator for all heavy civil construction projects. Wolf is previous owner of HP Civil Inc., a heavy civil contractor, and former GM of Farline Bridge Inc. I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project 5 Project Review Workshop Report Workshop May 7-8, 2018 Christopher Aguon, M.S., P.E. Christopher Aguon is ODOT’s Construction Project Manager since January 2016 overseeing the execution of federally and state funded construction projects in the Portland metro area. Aguon is ODOT Region 1 representative on the statewide Construction Leadership Team, and Vice Chair of ODOT Region 1 Safety Committee. Prior to joining ODOT Aguon held several positions at TriMet including Construction Resident Engineer and provided construction oversight for bridge track work, foundations, drainage systems and in-water construction of the Tilikum Crossing, a cable stayed bridge constructed to span the Willamette River for the Portland to Milwaukie Light Rail Project. Aguon also held progressive design responsibilities in the A&E industry Mike Morrow Mike Morrow is currently FHWA’s Team Leader for the Engineering and Operations Section in the Oregon Division overseeing a staff of 5 people. Morrow has been with FHWA for 28 years and in the Oregon FHWA Office for 13 years. Morrow worked in several FHWA offices early in his career including Florida, California, Washington DC, Washington, Utah and Oregon.
Recommended publications
  • Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Report

    Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Report

    Report to the Washington State Legislature Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory December 2017 Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Errata The Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory published to WSDOT’s website on December 1, 2017 contained the following errata. The items below have been corrected in versions downloaded or printed after January 10, 2018. Section 4, page 62: Corrects the parties to the tolling agreement between the States—the Washington State Transportation Commission and the Oregon Transportation Commission. Miscellaneous sections and pages: Minor grammatical corrections. Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory | December 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary. .1 Section 1: Introduction. .29 Legislative Background to this Report Purpose and Structure of this Report Significant Characteristics of the Project Area Prior Work Summary Section 2: Long-Range Planning . .35 Introduction Bi-State Transportation Committee Portland/Vancouver I-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership Task Force The Transition from Long-Range Planning to Project Development Section 3: Context and Constraints . 41 Introduction Guiding Principles: Vision and Values Statement & Statement of Purpose and Need Built and Natural Environment Navigation and Aviation Protected Species and Resources Traffic Conditions and Travel Demand Safety of Bridge and Highway Facilities Freight Mobility Mobility for Transit, Pedestrian and Bicycle Travel Section 4: Funding and Finance. 55 Introduction Funding and Finance Plan Evolution During
  • Appendix L: Design Guidelines: I-5 NCC Project

    Appendix L: Design Guidelines: I-5 NCC Project

    Appendix L: Design Guidelines: I-5 NCC Project Appendix L: Design Guidelines: I-5 NCC Project I-5 North Coast Corridor Project Final EIR/EIS page L-1 Appendix L: Design Guidelines: I-5 NCC Project I-5 North Coast Corridor Project Final EIR/EIS page L-2 Design Guidelines Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project September 2013 Prepared by: Caltrans District 11 | T.Y. Lin International | Safdie Rabines Architects | Estrada Land Planning Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project – Design Guidelines Design Guidelines Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project Prepared by: Caltrans District 11 4050 Taylor Street San Diego, CA 92110 T.Y. Lin International 404 Camino del Rio South, Suite 700 San Diego, CA 92108 | 619.692.1920 Safdie Rabines Architects 925 Ft. Stockton Drive San Diego, CA 92123 | 619.297.6153 Estrada Land Planning 755 Broadway Circle, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92101 | 619.236.0143 Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project – Design Guidelines Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project – Design Guidelines Table of Contents Design Guidelines Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project Table of Contents I. Project Background D. Design Themes....................17 vi. Typical Freeway Undercrossing. 36 vii. Typical Bridge Details. 37 A. Introduction....................1 i. Corridor Theme Elements. 17 ii. Corridor Theme Priorities. 19 - Southern Bluff Theme....................38 B. Purpose.......................1 - Coastal Mesa Theme.....................39 iii. Corridor Theme Units. 20 C. Components & Products. 1 - Northern Urban Theme. 40 - Southern Bluff Theme....................21 D. The Proposed Project. 2 - Coastal Mesa Theme.....................22 B. Walls.............................41 E. Previous Relevant Documents. 3 - Northern Urban Theme. 23 i. Theme Unit Specific Wall Concepts.
  • Route Map 5 Ä H339 Æ

    Route Map 5 Ä H339 Æ

    ASTORIA Oregon Department of Transportation Warrenton H104 Svensen Approved routes for Mayger 30 Westport ¤£ Clatskanie Æ 101 Olney Ä Rainier ¤£ H105 Triples Combinations. Æ Gearhart C L A T S O PÄ 47 Prescott SEASIDE Goble H332 202 Mist 73300 Movement is authorized 395 Umapine Necanicum Cold ¤£2 Jewell ¤£ Springs Jct. C O L U M B I A Æ Ä MP 9.76 Umatilla Jct. Milton-Freewater Flora Ä Æ Æ Cannon Beach Route Map 5 Ä H339 Æ H103 Pittsburg Irrigon Ä only under authority of an Columbia City Æ Over-Dimension Permit Unit Ä Elsie 47 730 Holdman 53 ST. HELENS ¤£ Helix 11 Vernonia Boardman 0 207 26 7 30 82 Athena Æ ¤£ Ä Over-Dimension Permit. ¤£ Revised March 2020 HERMISTON 3 ¨¦§ H Heppner Jct. Æ Ä H334 Weston Scappoose Stanfield 3 Nehalem 3 Adams 204 Manzanita HOOD Permission not granted to 5 RIVER cross RR crossing at MP 102.40 30 37 Æ 84 30 Echo Ä Wheeler Buxton £ in Hood River 84 ¤£ Arlington H W A L L O W A ¤ 3 Cascade ¨¦§ Biggs § MP 13.22 ¨¦ 26 Locks Jct. Rufus 3 Æ Rockaway Celilo Blalock Ä H320 1 Æ T I L L A M O O K ¤£ Mosier Ä 82 Beach Banks North H281 PENDLETON Plains PORTLAND Æ Ä Minam Imnaha Odell Wallowa Æ Ä 74 Garibaldi Wasco 207 W A S H I N G T O N The Elgin . Bay City Troutdale Multnomah Æ CorneliusÄ Fairview Dalles t Forest HILLSBORO H O O D H282 206 i 6 Grove Falls G I L L I A M Wood 84 Oceanside Beaverton R I V E R U M A T I L L A Summerville m H131 Village Ione r 8 ¨¦§ Lostine Æ Parkdale 197 Ä Gresham Moro 0 e Tillamook M U L T N O M A H MP 83.00 ¤£ 30 Imbler 5 Netarts ENTERPRISE Æ Ä Pilot 3 Æ Ä £ Æ Ä ¤ p Æ Ä Rock H Gaston Tigard
  • Last Link of I-90 Ends 30-Year Saga by Peggy Reynolds, Seattle Times, 9 Sept 1993

    Last Link of I-90 Ends 30-Year Saga by Peggy Reynolds, Seattle Times, 9 Sept 1993

    Last Link Of I-90 Ends 30-Year Saga By Peggy Reynolds, Seattle Times, 9 Sept 1993 Erica Clibborn's red convertible will be one of the first cars Sunday across the new Lacey V. Murrow Floating Bridge, last link in a project that started before Erica was born. The University of Washington junior, who will be going home to Mercer Island for Sunday dinner, was born in 1973, the year a federal court sent the Seattle-area stretch of Interstate 90 back to square one. By then, I-90 already reached most of the 3,063 miles from Boston to south Bellevue, and the final major segment had been in the works for 10 years. It would be another 20 years before that last 7 miles would be finished. That completion will be marked this weekend with an array of public events, and Clibborn and other drivers should be able to go across the eastbound span by 5 p.m. Sunday. That opening means that I-90 survived the anti-government sentiment of the late 1960s, the mass-transit worship of the '70s and the budget cutbacks of the '80s - even while other urban interstate projects were biting the dust in New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Washington, San Francisco and Portland. Nevertheless, whether or not I-90 was really needed was subject to debate at all levels. It attracted a formidable enemies list, and was rescued regularly by a cast of hundreds. Without any one of its friends in local governments, on the state Transportation Commission, in the Legislature and in Congress, I-90 could have ended in south Bellevue instead of making it to its junction with Interstate 5 in Seattle.
  • I-90 Tolling Update

    I-90 Tolling Update

    I-90 Tolling Update John White Director of Tolled Corridors Development Paula Hammond Steve Reinmuth Secretary of Transportation Chief of Staff Seattle City Council January 28, 2012 I-90 is part of the Cross-Lake Washington Corridor • Represents two major east-west “Cross- Lake” travel corridors: I-90 and SR 520. • WSDOT is tolling SR 520 as part of a multi- faceted financing strategy to help generate enough revenue to fund replacement of the structurally-vulnerable bridge. • A new 520 bridge will give Cross-Lake WA travelers a safer, more reliable trip. 2 Funding for the SR 520 Program Construction Unfunded Program cost estimate (Oct. 2012): $4.13 billion What’s funded: $2.72 billion (includes sales tax deferral) • Pontoon construction in Grays Harbor. • The floating bridge and landings. • Eastside transit and HOV improvements. • The north half of the west approach bridge. Updated November 2012 Costs and Funding for Replacing SR 520 Bridge SR 520 program cost estimate $4.128 B Funding received to date $2.724 B State and local funding (Nickel and TPA) $0.55 B Federal funding $0.12 B SR 520 Account (tolling and future federal funds) $1.91 B Toll proceeds • TIFIA $300M • Triple pledge bonds $550M • First tier toll $159M • PAYGO $74M Federal proceeds • GARVEE $825M Deferred sales tax $0.14 B Unfunded need $1.404 B Program cost estimate based on 2012 CEVP - updated 10/25/12 4 Early Indicators of 520 Toll Success • Meeting or beating traffic forecasts. • Meeting revenue forecasts. • Most people are paying with Good To Go! accounts. – More than 384,000 active Good To Go! accounts.
  • I-15 Corridor System Master Plan Update 2017

    I-15 Corridor System Master Plan Update 2017

    CALIFORNIA NEVADA ARIZONA UTAH I-15 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2017 MARCH 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan (Master Plan) is a commerce, port authorities, departments of aviation, freight product of the hard work and commitment of each of the and passenger rail authorities, freight transportation services, I-15 Mobility Alliance (Alliance) partner organizations and providers of public transportation services, environmental their dedicated staff. and natural resource agencies, and others. Individuals within the four states and beyond are investing Their efforts are a testament of outstanding partnership and their time and resources to keep this economic artery a true spirit of collaboration, without which this Master Plan of the West flowing. The Alliance partners come from could not have succeeded. state and local transportation agencies, local and interstate I-15 MOBILITY ALLIANCE PARTNERS American Magline Group City of Orem Authority Amtrak City of Provo Millard County Arizona Commerce Authority City of Rancho Cucamonga Mohave County Arizona Department of Transportation City of South Salt Lake Mountainland Association of Arizona Game and Fish Department City of St. George Governments Bear River Association of Governments Clark County Department of Aviation National Park Service - Lake Mead National Recreation Area BNSF Railway Clark County Public Works Nellis Air Force Base Box Elder County Community Planners Advisory Nevada Army National Guard Brookings Mountain West Committee on Transportation County
  • Leave the House Alone

    Leave the House Alone

    SUNRISE MONDAY EDmO JANUARY 7. 2008 Qkegonian t. ______~~c=~~~c=~ --------_:~~~~~~~ PORTLAND, OREGON 3REAKING NEWS AT OAEGONLlYLCOM WINNER Of THE 2007 fUUTZE~ PRIZE FOR BREAKING NEWS •• EDITORIALS TH.EOREGONIAN. MONOAY,JANUARY7,2008 THE OPINION OF THE OREGONIAN EDITORIAL BOARD Leave the house alone n the gritty southem edge of the transit cleared, as Tri-Met acquired various properties even after a 2004 environmental impact statement mall, where Interstate 405 dumps com­ and tore them down to make way for the tracks. concluded that the transit work would have mini~ muters into downtown, stands a lonely The Figo House is so isolated by construction work mal impact on his property. At the same time, the O vestige of old Portland, the Figo House now, it's hard even to reach Acker's office. State Historic Preservation Office agreed that the (named after the owner's dog.) It is channing to think that, when the work is house shouldn't be disturbed by the transit project It's a well·kept example of the Victorian archi­ done, the Figo House would again be accessible without some undefined measures, such as reloca­ tecture that has almost vanished from the central and situated by a busy light-rail station and the tion, to mitigate the changes. But TriMel says sub­ city. Unlike the last few remaining old houses state's largest university. But, of course, the transit sequent revisions to the light-rail route have put downtown, ~uch as the lovely but vacant halianale agency doesn't sec il that way. II wants 10 strip the the Figo House in tht' way.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000

    Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000

    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
  • I-405, SR 522 Vicinity to SR 527 Express Toll Lanes Improvement Project (MP 21.79 to 27.06)

    I-405, SR 522 Vicinity to SR 527 Express Toll Lanes Improvement Project (MP 21.79 to 27.06)

    JULY 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT I-405, SR 522 Vicinity to SR 527 Express Toll Lanes Improvement Project (MP 21.79 to 27.06) Mill Creek N 5 405 Canyon Park 527 Bothell Kenmore 522 522 Woodinville Kirkland 405 Lake Washington 520 520 Bellevue Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7090. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at [email protected] or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA (4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. Notificación de Titulo VI al Público Es la política del Departamento de Transporte del Estado de Washington el asegurarse que ninguna persona, por razones de raza, color, nación de origen o sexo, como es provisto en el Título VI del Acto de Derechos Civiles de 1964, ser excluido de la participación en, ser negado los beneficios de, o ser discriminado de otra manera bajo cualquiera de sus programas y actividades financiado con fondos federales.
  • Idaho Transpo Rtation De Partm

    Idaho Transpo Rtation De Partm

    IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION IDAHO RP 226 Assessing Feasibility of Mitigating Barn Owl-Vehicle Collisions in Southern RESEARCH REPORT RESEARCH Idaho By Jim Belthoff, Erin Arnold, Tempe Regan Boise State University Tiffany Allen, Angela Kociolek Western Transportation Institute Prepared for Idaho Transportation Department Research Program, Contracting Services Division of Engineering Services http://itd.idaho.gov/highways/research/ November 2015 Standard Disclaimer This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Idaho Transportation Department and the United States Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The State of Idaho and the United States Government assume no liability of its contents or use thereof. The contents of this report reflect the view of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Idaho Transportation Department or the United States Department of Transportation. The State of Idaho and the United States Government do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the object of this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-ID-15-226 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Assessing feasibility of mitigating barn owl-vehicle collisions in southern Idaho December 2015 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jim Belthoff, Erin Arnold, Tempe Regan, Tiffany Allen, and Angela Kociolek 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No.
  • Interstate 5 Corridor Improvements

    Interstate 5 Corridor Improvements

    Soundwall construction on northbound I-5, Santa Fe Springs, CA. New abutment for the Alondra Blvd. Bridge in Santa Fe Springs. Construction for the new southbound I-5 o-ramp at Imperial Hwy./Pioneer Blvd. in Norwalk. About the Santa Ana Freeway The Interstate 5 Corridor (Interstate 5) South Corridor Interstate 5 Improvement Projects OF TRAN T SP Improvement Projects EN O Interstate 5 in California is a vital north/south artery R M T T A R T A I O P for the travelling public and it is one of the state’s most E N D Six I-5 South Corridor Improvement Projects, extending U A heavily-used corridors to move goods and services N I C T I Corridor E R 6.7 miles between the Los Angeles County/Orange D E M ST A between the borders of Mexico and Canada. County line to the San Gabriel River Freeway (Interstate ATES OF 605), are identied by their location at Valley View Avenue, Improvements The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Alondra Boulevard, Carmenita Road, Rosecrans Avenue, District 7, serving Los Angeles and Ventura counties, Imperial Highway and Florence Avenue in the cities of I-5 Corridor Improvement Partners and its regional partners, the Los Angeles County La Mirada, Santa Fe Springs, Norwalk and Downey. South Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), are A $1.6 billion investment on the Santa Ana Freeway investing approximately $3 billion in several Interstate includes widening the roadway to add one High I-5 HOV/Florence Avenue Interchange 5 Corridor Improvement Projects, funded through a Occupancy Vehicle (HOV), or carpool lane, and one combination of federal, state and local resources.
  • North on Interstate 5 Over the Grapevine Past Lebec. Take Hwy

    North on Interstate 5 Over the Grapevine Past Lebec. Take Hwy

    P. O. BOX 36, CALIENTE, CALIFORNIA 93518 (661) 867-2511 WWW.RANKINRANCH.COM TO SACRAMENTO 99 McFarland Paso Robles Wasco Lake Isabella 46 178 GREENHORN MTS. 99 TO SAN FRANCISCO SEQUOIA 65 NATIONAL 5 FOREST PIUTE MTS. 178 BAKERSFIELD 5 58 CALIENTE 99 BEAR MTN. BLVD. Keene 223 Arvin 58 5 LAKE ISABELLA TEHACHAPI Taft LAMONT ARVIN Mojave 99 Maricopa Kern Los Angeles 14 ANGELES Rankin Ranch is approximately: NATL. 5 2½ hours from Los Angeles FOREST 3½ hours from Santa Barbara N 4½ hours from San Diego Lebec Lancaster 5½ hours from San Francisco Frazier Park TO LOS ANGELES FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: North on Interstate 5 over the Grapevine past Lebec. Take Hwy. 99 to 223 (Bear Mountain Blvd.). Turn RIGHT. Go through the small town of Arvin (last chance for gasoline!) Proceed 11 miles to Highway 58. Turn right towards Mojave 1½ miles to the Caliente turnoff. Turn left off the freeway. Follow directions below FROM CALIENTE below. FROM NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: South on Interstate 5 of Highway 99 to Bakerseld. Turn east on Highway 58 towards Tehachapi and Mojave. It is approximately 23 miles from Bakerseld to the Caliente turnoff. Turn left off the freeway. Follow directions FROM CALIENTE below. FROM CALIENTE: Proceed through the small town of Caliente, past the U.S. Post Ofce on the right. Approximately 2½ miles past the post ofce you will come to a “Y” in the road. Go LEFT up the hill. Rankin Ranch is 9 miles from the “Y”. A beautiful scenic winding mountain road (no houses). It will take approximately 30 minutes from the “Y” to reach the Rankin Ranch entrance on the right as you drop down into the valley..