DOCSLIB.ORG

Iv UNIVERSITY of OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iv UNIVERSITY of OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE INVESTIGATING MOUND ACTIVITIES AT MISSISSIPPIAN SITES IN THE SOUTHEAST: iv A SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF LITHIC DEBITAGE AT THE PEVEY SITE (22LW510) IN MISSISSIPPI A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By SARAH LUTHMAN Norman, Oklahoma 2017 INVESTIGATING MOUND ACTIVITIES AT MISSISSIPPIAN MOUND SITES IN THE SOUTHEAST: A SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF LITHIC DEBITAGE AT THE PEVEY SITE (22LW510) IN MISSISSIPPI A THESIS APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY v BY _________________________________ Dr. Patrick Livingood, Chair _________________________________ Dr. Asa Randall _________________________________ Dr. Amanda Regnier vi © Copyright by SARAH LUTHMAN 2017 All Rights Reserved. Acknowledgements I would be entirely remiss if I did not start by thanking my committee, whose ideas, constructive criticism, and support made this thesis possible. Drs. Patrick Livingood, Asa Randall, and Amanda Regnier have provided fantastic examples of positivity, and were available and responsive for whatever I needed. Dr. Randall’s classes on archaeological theory and southeastern archaeology greatly contributed to some of the ideas in this paper, especially the second chapter. Dr. Regnier helped most iv with my writing style, but also provided a smart reorganization of the first chapter. Dr. Livingood has led me through every step of the writing process, allowing me to work on the materials collected from his dissertation site, helping me formulate research questions, and providing comments on every page of this document. Without him, there would be no thesis. I would also like to thank the Department of Anthropology at the University of Oklahoma, and all of the faculty who have showed me what opportunities are available in archaeology, and how history affects the lives of people today. They have worked together to create an environment that fosters friendly intellectual conversation, which has allowed me to take risks and ask questions. I would especially like to acknowledge Dr. Bonnie Pitblado, who introduced me to lithic analysis, and whose coding sheets helped me to organize what it was I wanted to know about the stone artifacts at the Pevey site. I also need to thank Dr. Paul Sandberg, who helped me to understand the basic statistics generated by this analysis, and who showed me how to discuss them. I would also be remiss if I did not recognize the contributions of other archaeology graduate students to this paper. As an audience to their posters and papers, iv I have seen examples of how rigorous analysis can provide information about the past that really matters to other archaeologists. My cohort especially has been a lifeline of support and sanity during these trying times that we call graduate school. Finally, I would like to thank Piers, who knew very little about the study of archaeology, but who listened attentively anyways when I talked of mounds and flakes. He has always been overly positive, and is very good at telling you you’re almost done (even when you’re not). His support during the last year is greatly appreciated, and his v patience and understanding with my long absences while writing is admirable. v Table of Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. viii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. ix Abstract…………. ....................................................................................................................... xi Ch. 1: The Pevey Site ................................................................................................................... 1 Previous Research at Pevey ................................................................................................ 4 Mound Research along the Lower Mississippi and Black Warrior Rivers ....................... 12 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 15 Ch. 2: Mound Arrangements ...................................................................................................... 17 Social Space Theory ......................................................................................................... 19 vi Archaic Mounds ................................................................................................................ 25 Look to the East: Mississippian Culture ........................................................................... 29 Moundville: a Mississippian Mound Site ......................................................................... 33 Plaquemine Cultures ......................................................................................................... 41 Look to the West: Plaquemine and Coles Creek Mound Sites of the Lower Mississippi and Big Black Rivers ........................................................................................................ 44 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 53 Ch. 3: Lithics Theory and Methods ............................................................................................ 56 Centralization, Stratification, and Craft Production.......................................................... 58 Choosing Proveniences for Analysis ................................................................................ 66 Citronelle Gravels ............................................................................................................. 70 Reduction Stages ............................................................................................................... 73 Analysis of Unmodified Flakes ........................................................................................ 75 Types of Flakes ................................................................................................................. 82 Typological Concepts for Tools........................................................................................ 87 Modified Lithics ............................................................................................................... 90 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 92 Ch. 4: Results .............................................................................................................................. 94 Assemblage Summary ...................................................................................................... 97 Hypothesis 1 ..................................................................................................................... 99 Multivariate Analysis .................................................................................................. 112 Hypothesis 2 ................................................................................................................... 118 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 128 vi Chapter 5: Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 132 References ................................................................................................................................ 138 Appendix 1: Coding Flake Attributes ....................................................................................... 149 Appendix 2: Coding Tool Attributes ........................................................................................ 151 Appendix 3: Coding Hammerstone and Core Attributes .......................................................... 154 Appendix 4: Lithic Debitage Analysis ..................................................................................... 153 Appendix 5: Lithic Tools Analysis ........................................................................................... 228 Appendix 6: Hammerstones and Cores Analysis ..................................................................... 235 vii vii List of Tables Table 3.1: Analytical units from each unit, showing excavated lithics………….....68-69 Table 3.2: Description of width/thickness ratios for each biface stage………………..75 Table 4.1: Debitage and tools at each unit……………………………………………101 Table 4.2: Types of tools at Pevey……………………………………………………104 Table 4.3: Stone debitage, stone tool, and ceramic densities for each unit…………..105 Table 4.4: Eigenvectors for Principle Components 1, 2, and 3………………………112 viii viii List of Figures Figure 1.1: Map of Pevey on the Pearl River…………………………………………4 Figure 1.2: Present heights of the mounds at Pevey………………………………….5 Figure 1.3: Map of Pevey’s mounds………………………………………………….6 Figure 1.4: Culture chronology chart for the Lower Mississippi River Valley………9 Figure 1.5: Map of contemporaneous sites in and near Mississippi………………...14 Figure 2.1: Idealized locations and sizes of mounds that may convey status……….23 Figure 2.2: Picture of St. Catherine’s Island shell rings…………………………….28 Figure 2.3: Model of MIIS influence………………………………………………..30 ix Figure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mortuary Patterns in West-Central Tennessee: Contextualizing Historic Field Data from Nine Mississippian Period Sites
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 4-6-2018 Mortuary Patterns In West-Central Tennessee: Contextualizing Historic Field Data From Nine Mississippian Period Sites Brooke Adele Wamsley Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Wamsley, Brooke Adele, "Mortuary Patterns In West-Central Tennessee: Contextualizing Historic Field Data From Nine Mississippian Period Sites" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 896. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/896 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MORTUARY PATTERNS IN WEST-CENTRAL TENNESSEE: CONTEXTUALIZING HISTORIC FIELD DATA FROM NINE MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD SITES Brooke A. Wamsley 156 pages Middle Mississippian is a both a cultural and temporal (1200 CE – 1400 CE) archaeological context of Midwestern North America. This cultural tradition is associated with mound building, specific art motifs, arguably stratified societies, intensive agriculture, and specific ritual/mortuary practices. Burial sites can be very valuable to archaeologists because of the purposeful interaction between the living and the deceased and reconstruction of cultural elements such as social identity and group membership. While American archaeology continues to be fieldwork-focused, there are a considerable amount of cultural resources housed in museum collections that could provide data for research into pre-Columbian life-ways in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • Further Investigations Into the King George
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22) Harry Gene Brignac Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brignac Jr, Harry Gene, "Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22)" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2720. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2720 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE KING GEORGE ISLAND MOUNDS SITE (16LV22) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology By Harry Gene Brignac Jr. B.A. Louisiana State University, 2003 May, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God for surrounding me with the people in my life who have guided and supported me in this and all of my endeavors. I have to express my greatest appreciation to Dr. Rebecca Saunders for her professional guidance during this entire process, and for her inspiration and constant motivation for me to become the best archaeologist I can be.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Tristram R
    December 14, 2017 Curriculum Vitae Tristram R. Kidder Edward S. and Tedi Macias Professor and Chair Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis [email protected] Lab URL: http://pages.wustl.edu/kidder Education 1988 Harvard University: Ph.D., Anthropology 1987 Harvard University: M.A., Anthropology 1982 Tulane University: B.A., Anthropology Major Field/Research Interests: Anthropological archaeology; geoarchaeology, environmental archaeology, and the archaeological study of climate change; Indian cultures of North America; the formation of hierarchical social systems, the emergence of social complexity, and complex hunter-gatherer history; historical ecology, and the relationship between climate, landscape evolution, and human social change. Teaching and Professional Experience: 2017- Visiting Professor (summer term), Teaching and Experimental Center for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Protection, School of History and Culture, Henan University, Kaifeng 2008- Chair, Department of Anthropology, Washington University 2003- Professor of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis 2003- Professor of Environmental Studies in Arts & Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis 2003 Professor of Anthropology, Tulane University 2002-2003 Interim Dean, Tulane College 1995-2003 Associate Professor of Anthropology, Tulane University 1989-2003 Director, Center for Archaeology, Tulane University 1989-1995 Assistant Professor of Anthropology, Tulane University 1988-89 Lecturer on Anthropology, Harvard University 1987-88 Instructor
    [Show full text]
  • Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site Benjamin Garrett Davis University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Benjamin Garrett, "Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1570. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1570 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOUSEHOLDS AND CHANGING USE OF SPACE AT THE TRANSITIONAL EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN AUSTIN SITE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of Mississippi by BENJAMIN GARRETT DAVIS May 2019 ABSTRACT The Austin Site (22TU549) is a village site located in Tunica County, Mississippi dating to approximately A.D. 1150-1350, along the transition from the Terminal Late Woodland to the Mississippian period. While Elizabeth Hunt’s (2017) masters thesis concluded that the ceramics at Austin emphasized a Late Woodland persistence, the architecture and use of space at the site had yet to be analyzed. This study examines this architecture and use of space over time at Austin to determine if they display evidence of increasing institutionalized inequality. This included creating a map of Austin based on John Connaway’s original excavation notes, and then analyzing this map within the temporal context of the upper Yazoo Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Beyond the Obvious: Identifying Patterns in Coles Creek Mortuary Data
    Looking Beyond the Obvious: Identifying Patterns in Coles Creek Mortuary Data Megan C. Kassabaum University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill [Paper presented at the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Charlotte, N.C., 2008] Two characteristics of prehistoric societies in the southeastern United States are commonly used to support arguments for the presence of chiefly political and social organization. One of these characteristics is the large-scale construction of earthworks (particularly large platform mound and plaza complexes); the other is the employment of elaborate mortuary ceremonialism and sumptuous burial goods. Some claim that the earliest indications of chiefdoms can be recognized in the indigenous Coles Creek tradition of southwestern Mississippi and east-central Louisiana. Around A.D. 700, people in this region began building large-scale earthworks similar to those of later, decidedly hierarchical Mississippian polities. However, previous investigators of mortuary remains from these Coles Creek sites report a paucity of burial goods and absence of ornate individual burials (Ford 1951; Giardino 1977; Neuman 1984). Due to the distinct presence of one traditional marker for hierarchical social organization and the reported lack of another, the issue of Coles Creek social differentiation remains a paradox for Southeastern archaeologists. While a relatively small number of Coles Creek sites have been satisfactorily excavated, further analysis of data from these previous archaeological investigations may still reveal significant
    [Show full text]
  • October 2016 | HORIZON & TRADITION
    October 2016 | HORIZON & TRADITION SEAC OFFICERS 2016 Gregory A. Waselkov President Contents Jay K. Johnson Volume 58, Number 2 President-Elect Edmond A. (Tony) Boudreaux III Secretary Editor’s Note .............................................................................. 3 Kandi Hollenbach Treasurer Nicholas P. Herrmann Treasurer-Elect President’s Letter ....................................................................... 4 Shannon Hodge Executive Officer I News and Notes ........................................................................ 6 Janet E. Levy Executive Officer II Elizabeth J. Reitz Editor SEAC 2016 Information ........................................................... 8 Karen Y. Smith Social Media Editor-Elect 2016 Elections ........................................................................... 9 Patrick Livingood Associate Editor (Book Reviews)* Eugene M. Futato Associate Editor (Sales)* From Sea Turtles to Shipwrecks: A Program to Monitor the Phillip Hodge Movement of Marine Cultural Resources in Coastal Virginia Associate Editor (Newsletter)* and Maryland ............................................................................. 13 Vanessa N. Hanvey Student Representative* *non-voting board member Random Sample: “The Whole History of a Place.” An Interview with Jessica Crawford ........................................ 18 Contact Information for Officers INFORMATION FOR SUBSCRIBERS Horizon & Tradition is the digital newsletter of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference. It is pub- Lagniappe: Election
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brown 2015 Plaquemine Culturepottery
    ____ Exploring ____ THEA TERN Edited by Patricia Galloway and Evan Peacock University Press of Mississippi I Jackson Essays in Honor of Samuel 0. Brookes To the memory of John W. Baswell www.upress.state.ms.us The University Press of Mississippi is a member of the Association of American University Presses. Copyright @ 2015 by University Press of Mississippi All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing 2015 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Exploring southeastern archaeology I edited by Patricia Galloway, Evan Peacock; foreword by Jeffrey P. Brain. pages cm Includes index. ISBN 978+62846-240-1 (hardback) - ISBN 978-1-62674-689-3 (ebook) 1. Indians of North America-Southern States-Antiquities. 2. Excava­ tions (Archaeology)-Southern States. 3. Southern States-Antiquities. I. Peacock, Evan, 1961- editor. II. Galloway, Patricia Kay, editor. E78.S65E93 2015 975'.01-dc23 2014047540 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data available Contents xi Foreword Jaffrey P. Brain 3 Chapter 1. Introductory Remarks Evan PHcock and Patricia Galloway PART I: PUBLIC ARCHAEOLOGY AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE 9 Chapter 2. Archaeology on the National Forests of North Mississippi: A Brief Retrospective EvanPHcock 23 Chapter 3. Pimento Cheese and Bacon? Revisiting Mounds in the Lower Mississippi Delta Cllff Jenkins PART II: THE ARCHAIC PERIOD 43 Chapter 4. Early Holocene Climate in the Eastern United States: A View from Mississippi Samuel O. Brookes and Mellssa H. Twaroskl 55 Chapter 5. Sam Brookes and Prehistoric Effigy Beads of the Southeast Jessica Crawford 71 Chapter 6. Archaic Chert Beads and Craft Specialization: Application of an Organization oflechnology Model All son M.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcoux, Jon Bernard
    CHEROKEE HOUSEHOLDS AND COMMUNITIES IN THE ENGLISH CONTACT PERIOD, A.D. 1670-1740 Jon Bernard Marcoux A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Chair: Vincas Steponaitis Advisor: Brett Riggs Reader: Brian Billman Reader: C. Margaret Scarry Reader: John Scarry ©2008 Jon Bernard Marcoux ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT JON BERNARD MARCOUX: Cherokee Households and Communities in the English Contact Period, A.D. 1670-1740 (Under the direction of Vincas P. Steponaitis and Brett Riggs) This study focuses on issues of culture contact and the materialization of identity through an archaeological case study of a late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century Cherokee community located in eastern Tennessee. The English Contact period (ca. A.D. 1670-1740) was an extremely turbulent time for southeastern Indian groups marked by disease, warfare, and population movements. I examine how this chaotic period played out in the daily lives of Cherokee households. I use primary and secondary sources to develop an historical context for the English Contact period in the southeastern United States. I introduce a reliable way to identify English Contact period Cherokee occupations using pottery and glass trade bead data. I also consult artifact data in order to identify patterns associated with change and stability in the activities of daily life within Cherokee households. I find that daily life in Cherokee households changed dramatically as they coped with the shifting social, political, and economic currents of the English Contact period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas
    Volume 2021 Article 1 2021 The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas Timothy K. Perttula None Duncan McKinnon Scott Hammerstedt University of Oklahoma Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Perttula, Timothy K.; McKinnon, Duncan; and Hammerstedt, Scott (2021) "The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2021, Article 1. ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2021/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2021/iss1/1 1 The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas Compiled by Timothy K.
    [Show full text]