Mortuary Patterns in West-Central Tennessee: Contextualizing Historic Field Data from Nine Mississippian Period Sites

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mortuary Patterns in West-Central Tennessee: Contextualizing Historic Field Data from Nine Mississippian Period Sites Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 4-6-2018 Mortuary Patterns In West-Central Tennessee: Contextualizing Historic Field Data From Nine Mississippian Period Sites Brooke Adele Wamsley Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Wamsley, Brooke Adele, "Mortuary Patterns In West-Central Tennessee: Contextualizing Historic Field Data From Nine Mississippian Period Sites" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 896. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/896 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MORTUARY PATTERNS IN WEST-CENTRAL TENNESSEE: CONTEXTUALIZING HISTORIC FIELD DATA FROM NINE MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD SITES Brooke A. Wamsley 156 pages Middle Mississippian is a both a cultural and temporal (1200 CE – 1400 CE) archaeological context of Midwestern North America. This cultural tradition is associated with mound building, specific art motifs, arguably stratified societies, intensive agriculture, and specific ritual/mortuary practices. Burial sites can be very valuable to archaeologists because of the purposeful interaction between the living and the deceased and reconstruction of cultural elements such as social identity and group membership. While American archaeology continues to be fieldwork-focused, there are a considerable amount of cultural resources housed in museum collections that could provide data for research into pre-Columbian life-ways in North America. This project used archived excavation information from past fieldwork to ask modern contextual questions about sites that are archaeologically inaccessible. These field notes and reports as well as a recent inventory of the curated human osteological remains were used to analyze the mortuary patterns (e.g., grave accompaniments, burial orientation, burial location, segregation by age or sex) of nine Middle Mississippian period sites from what is now the Kentucky Lake reservoir of west-central Tennessee. Among the results of the mortuary assessment is the recognition that sex, rather than rank or social role, is a primary identity marker. KEYWORDS: Middle Mississippian, Middle Cumberland, Mortuary Context, Mortuary Analysis, Tennessee, Biological Archaeology MORTUARY PATTERNS IN WEST-CENTRAL TENNESSEE: CONTEXTUALIZING HISTORIC FIELD DATA FROM NINE MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD SITES BROOKE A. WAMSLEY A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Sociology and Anthropology ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY 2018 Copyright 2018 Brooke A. Wamsley MORTUARY PATTERNS IN WEST-CENTRAL TENNESSEE: CONTEXTUALIZING HISTORIC FIELD DATA FROM NINE MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD SITES BROOKE A. WAMSLEY COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Maria O. Smith, Chair James M. Skibo ACKNOWLEDGMENTS While there are many people that deserve my gratitude for their support with this project, the first person I must thank is my advisor and committee chair, Dr. Maria O. Smith. She has been invaluable to me with regards to guidance, encouragement, and support in finally finishing what felt like a never-ending project. Next, I must thank Dr. James M. Skibo for agreeing to be part of my committee and helping to remind me that no matter the data, I still needed to be a decent writer. I would also like to thank the Frank H. McClung Museum at the University of Tennessee for access to the archived field records, without which this project would have never been done. I want to sincerely thank all my fellow graduate cohort members for their support and advice. Specifically, Kelsey Hansen, who was always willing to provide another view point on theory, advice, edit suggestions, or even just a glass of wine and a good laugh. Also, Tiffany Hansen, Christopher Nicosia, and Dustin Lloyd, for their enthusiasm for our subfield and a shared love of pop culture that helped keep us all sane. I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge the two people that introduced me to physical anthropology and archaeology in the first place, Theresa Schober and Corbett Torrence. Lastly, I owe a great deal of thanks to my mother and sister for encouraging me to go back to school in the first place and never expecting me to settle for anything less than my best regardless of the frustration or the student loans. B.A.W. i CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS i TABLES vii FIGURES x CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER II: BACKGROUND 4 The Middle Mississippian Culture Definition 6 The Middle Cumberland Culture Definition 7 Identified Mortuary Patterns and Material Culture 7 American Archaeology and the TVA 11 The Sites Included in this Study 11 The Danville Ferry Site 14 The Hobbs Site 15 The Indian Bluff Site 15 The Lick Creek Site 16 The Link Site /The Slayden Site 16 The Mound Bottom Site 17 The Patterson Site 18 The Thompson Village Site 18 CHAPTER III: MATERIALS AND METHODS 20 Materials 20 Source of Age-at-Death and Sex Information 21 ii Categories of Data 21 Research Questions 23 Contextual Criteria 27 Stone Box Use 27 Primary vs. Secondary Burials 28 Material Culture 29 CHAPTER IV: RESULTS 31 Description of Data Found: Individual Site Patterns 32 Danville Ferry Site 40Bn3 32 Age and Sex 33 Deposition and Positioning 34 Burial Orientation 35 Burial Sequence 36 Grave Goods 36 Dog Burials 37 Hobbs Site 40Hs44 38 Age and Sex 38 Deposition and Positioning 39 Burial Orientation 40 Burial Sequence 41 Grave Goods 41 Indian Bluff 40Sw20 43 Age and Sex 43 iii Deposition and Positioning 44 Burial Orientation 46 Burial Sequence 47 Grave Goods 47 Lick Creek Site 40Bn30 51 Age and Sex 51 Deposition and Positioning 52 Burial Orientation 53 Burial Sequence 54 Grave Goods 54 Link Site 40Hs6 56 Age and Sex 56 Deposition and Positioning 57 Burial Orientation 58 Burial Sequence 58 Grave Goods 59 Mound Bottom Site 40Ch8 61 Age and Sex 61 Deposition and Positioning 62 Burial Orientation 63 Burial Sequence 63 Grave Goods 64 Patterson Site 40Hs12 66 iv Age and Sex 66 Deposition and Positioning 67 Burial Orientation 68 Burial Sequence 68 Grave Goods 68 Slayden Site 40Hs1 69 Age and Sex 69 Deposition and Positioning 70 Burial Orientation 70 Burial Sequence 71 Grave Goods 71 Thompson Village Site 40Hy5 72 Age and Sex 72 Deposition and Positioning 73 Burial Orientation 75 Burial Sequence 75 Grave Goods 76 CHAPTER V: ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS 79 Analysis 79 Deposition and Positioning by Age Group 79 Deposition and Positioning by Sex 80 Burial Orientation by Age Group 81 Burial Orientation by Sex 83 v Artifact Categories by Age Group 84 Artifact Categories by Sex 86 Discussion and Conclusion 87 Burial Treatment by Sex and Age-at-Death 88 Burial Accompaniments by Sex and Age-at-Death 92 Culture Region Question 95 Future Research in this Area 96 REFERENCES 98 APPENDIX A: BURIAL INVENTORIES BY SITE 118 vi TABLES Table Page 1. 3.1 Investigative Categories 22 2. 3.2 Artifact Types and Descriptions of Categories 23 3. 4.1.1 Total Curated Individuals by Age and Sex, Danville Ferry 40Bn3 33 4. 4.1.2 Total Curated Individuals by Deposition and Position, Danville Ferry 40Bn3 35 5. 4.1.3 Total Curated Individuals by Burial Orientation, Danville Ferry 40Bn3 35 6. 4.1.4 Total Curated Individuals by Burial Sequence, Danville Ferry 40Bn3 37 7. 4.2.1 Total Curated Individuals by Age and Sex, Hobbs Site 40Hs44 39 8. 4.2.2 Total Curated Individuals by Deposition and Position, Hobbs Site 40Hs44 40 9. 4.2.3 Total Curated Individuals by Burial Orientation, Hobbs Site 40Hs44 41 10. 4.2.4 Total Curated Individuals by Burial Sequence, Hobbs Site 40Hs44 41 11. 4.2.5 Individuals with Artifact Description and Type, Hobbs Site 40Hs44 42 12. 4.3.1 Total Curated Individuals by Age and Sex, Indian Bluff 40Sw20 44 13. 4.3.2 Total Curated Individuals by Deposition and Position, Indian Bluff 40Sw20 45 14. 4.3.3 Total Curated Individuals by Burial Orientation, Indian Bluff 40Sw20 46 15. 4.3.4 Total Curated Individuals by Burial Sequence, Indian Bluff 40Sw20 47 16. 4.3.5 Individuals with Artifact Description and Type, Indian Bluff 40Sw20 49 17. 4.4.1 Total Curated Individuals by Age and Sex, Lick Creek 40Bn3 52 vii 18. 4.4.2 Total Curated Individuals by Deposition and Position, Lick Creek 40Bn3 53 17. 4.4.3 Total Curated Individuals by Orientation, Lick Creek 40Bn3 53 18. 4.4.4 Total Curated Individuals by Burial Sequence, Lick Creek 40Bn3 54 19. 4.4.5 Individuals with Artifact Description and Type, Lick Creek 40Bn3 55 20. 4.5.1 Total Curated Individuals by Age and Sex, Link Site 40Hs6 57 21. 4.5.2 Total Curated Individuals by Deposition and Position, Link Site 40Hs6 58 22. 4.5.3 Total Curated Individuals by Orientation, Link Site 40Hs6 58 23. 4.5.4 Total Curated Individuals by Burial Sequence, Link Site 40Hs6 59 24. 4.5.5 Individuals with Artifact Descriptions and Type, Link Site 40Hs6 60 25. 4.6.1 Total Curated Individuals by Age and Sex, Mound Bottom 40Ch8 62 26. 4.6.2 Total Curated Individuals by Deposition and Position, Mound Bottom 40Ch8 63 27. 4.6.3 Total Curated Individuals by Orientation, Mound Bottom 40Ch8 63 28. 4.6.4 Total Curated Individuals by Burial Sequence, Mound Bottom 40Ch8 64 29. 4.6.5 Individuals with Artifact Description and Type, Mound Bottom 40Ch8 65 30. 4.7.1 Total Curated Individuals by Age and Sex, Patterson 40Hs12 67 31. 4.7.2 Total Curated Individuals by Deposition and Position, Patterson 40Hs12 67 32.
Recommended publications
  • SEAC Bulletin 58.Pdf
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 72ND ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 18-21, 2015 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE BULLETIN 58 SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE BULLETIN 58 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 72ND ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 18-21, 2015 DOUBLETREE BY HILTON DOWNTOWN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE Organized by: Kevin E. Smith, Aaron Deter-Wolf, Phillip Hodge, Shannon Hodge, Sarah Levithol, Michael C. Moore, and Tanya M. Peres Hosted by: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Middle Tennessee State University Division of Archaeology, Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Office of Social and Cultural Resources, Tennessee Department of Transportation iii Cover: Sellars Mississippian Ancestral Pair. Left: McClung Museum of Natural History and Culture; Right: John C. Waggoner, Jr. Photographs by David H. Dye Printing of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 58 – 2015 Funded by Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Authorization No. 327420, 750 copies. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $4.08 per copy. October 2015. Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s Policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in its programs, services or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, EEO/AA Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 2nd floor, William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-888-867-7455. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the ADA Coordinator, Human Resources Division, 312 Rosa L.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Investigations Into the King George
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22) Harry Gene Brignac Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brignac Jr, Harry Gene, "Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22)" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2720. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2720 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE KING GEORGE ISLAND MOUNDS SITE (16LV22) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology By Harry Gene Brignac Jr. B.A. Louisiana State University, 2003 May, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God for surrounding me with the people in my life who have guided and supported me in this and all of my endeavors. I have to express my greatest appreciation to Dr. Rebecca Saunders for her professional guidance during this entire process, and for her inspiration and constant motivation for me to become the best archaeologist I can be.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Archaeology in Kansas
    Current Archaeology in Kansas Number 6 2006 Contents Title and Author(s) Page The D. Heasty Cache Revisited – Donald J. Blakeslee 1 Eckles Collection from the Montana Creek Sites, Lovewell Locality, Jewell County, Kansas - Lauren W. Ritterbush 5 Archaeological Excavation Adjacent to Fort Osage - Jim D. Feagins 17 Ceramic Period Components at the Claussen Site, 14WB322 - Donna C. Roper 18 The 2005 Kansas Obsidian Sourcing Project - C. Tod Bevitt 23 Dyche Collection from the Fanning Site - Jim D. Feagins 30 The Phil Site House: Analysis of a Central Plains Tradition Lodge, Lovewell Reservoir, North-Central Kansas - Brad Logan and Sarah J. Meitl 31 An Archaeological Survey of Front Nine: Fort Hays Municipal Golf Course, Ellis County - Mark A. Latham, Susan Houghton, and C. Tod Bevitt 38 Searching for Dr. Doy?: Archaeology and the Underground Railroad in Douglas County, Kansas - Margaret C. Wood 40 A Small Survey on the Walnut River - David T. Hughes 46 Archaeological Survey in the Stranger Creek Basin-2005: A Progress Report - Brad Logan 54 Printing of this issue of Current Archaeology in Kansas was provided by the Kansas State Historical Society The D.Heasty Cache Revisited Donald J. Blakeslee Wichita State University Introduction Since the donation has enlarged the original In 1985, Dale Heasty found a lithic cache collection significantly, this brief report re- in Sumner County, Kansas. It was located in a small examines the cache and presents the pertinent data. pit on a site of unknown cultural affiliation near the Chikaskia River. His son, Don Heasty, eventually donated 28 specimens from the cache to Wichita State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Tristram R
    December 14, 2017 Curriculum Vitae Tristram R. Kidder Edward S. and Tedi Macias Professor and Chair Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis [email protected] Lab URL: http://pages.wustl.edu/kidder Education 1988 Harvard University: Ph.D., Anthropology 1987 Harvard University: M.A., Anthropology 1982 Tulane University: B.A., Anthropology Major Field/Research Interests: Anthropological archaeology; geoarchaeology, environmental archaeology, and the archaeological study of climate change; Indian cultures of North America; the formation of hierarchical social systems, the emergence of social complexity, and complex hunter-gatherer history; historical ecology, and the relationship between climate, landscape evolution, and human social change. Teaching and Professional Experience: 2017- Visiting Professor (summer term), Teaching and Experimental Center for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Protection, School of History and Culture, Henan University, Kaifeng 2008- Chair, Department of Anthropology, Washington University 2003- Professor of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis 2003- Professor of Environmental Studies in Arts & Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis 2003 Professor of Anthropology, Tulane University 2002-2003 Interim Dean, Tulane College 1995-2003 Associate Professor of Anthropology, Tulane University 1989-2003 Director, Center for Archaeology, Tulane University 1989-1995 Assistant Professor of Anthropology, Tulane University 1988-89 Lecturer on Anthropology, Harvard University 1987-88 Instructor
    [Show full text]
  • Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site Benjamin Garrett Davis University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Benjamin Garrett, "Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1570. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1570 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOUSEHOLDS AND CHANGING USE OF SPACE AT THE TRANSITIONAL EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN AUSTIN SITE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of Mississippi by BENJAMIN GARRETT DAVIS May 2019 ABSTRACT The Austin Site (22TU549) is a village site located in Tunica County, Mississippi dating to approximately A.D. 1150-1350, along the transition from the Terminal Late Woodland to the Mississippian period. While Elizabeth Hunt’s (2017) masters thesis concluded that the ceramics at Austin emphasized a Late Woodland persistence, the architecture and use of space at the site had yet to be analyzed. This study examines this architecture and use of space over time at Austin to determine if they display evidence of increasing institutionalized inequality. This included creating a map of Austin based on John Connaway’s original excavation notes, and then analyzing this map within the temporal context of the upper Yazoo Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethnohistoric and Archaeological Investigation of Late Fort Ancient Bifacial Endscrapers
    The College of Wooster Open Works Senior Independent Study Theses 2020 Tools of the Trade: An Ethnohistoric and Archaeological Investigation of Late Fort Ancient Bifacial Endscrapers Kevin Andrew Rolph The College of Wooster, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy Recommended Citation Rolph, Kevin Andrew, "Tools of the Trade: An Ethnohistoric and Archaeological Investigation of Late Fort Ancient Bifacial Endscrapers" (2020). Senior Independent Study Theses. Paper 9005. This Senior Independent Study Thesis Exemplar is brought to you by Open Works, a service of The College of Wooster Libraries. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Independent Study Theses by an authorized administrator of Open Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Copyright 2020 Kevin Andrew Rolph Tools of the Trade: An Ethnohistoric and Archaeological Investigation of Late Fort Ancient Bifacial Endscrapers By Kevin A. Rolph A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements of Independent Study In Archaeology at The College of Wooster Archaeology 451 Dr. Olivia Navarro- Farr March 23, 2020 Abstract The arrival of Europeans to the New World forever changed the social and economic landscapes of Native Peoples who occupied the continents. Colonial institutions profited off the land and those who occupied it. One institution that exemplified this was the Fur Trade. Throughout the North and Northeast colonies, European nations acquired furs from a variety of mammals to meet the trans-Atlantic demand. To maximize profits in the New World many European colonizers turned to Native peoples to aid in their economic endeavors. Native Americans employed trade routes and knowledge of the land to their advantage in the new economic landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Mississippian Period (AD 1350-1500) - Draft
    SECTION IV: The Mississippian Period in Tennessee Chapter 12: The Late Mississippian Period (AD 1350-1500) - Draft By Michaelyn Harle, Shannon D. Koerner, and Bobby R. Braly 1 Introduction Throughout the Mississippian world this time period appears to be a time of great social change. In eastern Tennessee, Dallas Phase sites further elaborated on the Mississippian lifeway, becoming highly organized and home to political leaders. Settlements were sometimes quite extensive (i.e., the Dallas, Toqua, and Ledford Island sites with deep middens, often a palisade wall, sometimes with bastions, densely packed domestic structures, and human interments throughout the village area and also in mounds. Elsewhere in the region, there is evidence that much of West Tennessee and parts of the Cumberland-Tennessee valley were either abandoned by Mississippian societies or so fundamentally reorganized that they were rendered archaeologically invisible. This abandonment appears to be part of a larger regional trend of large portions of the Central Mississippi Valley, often referred to as the vacant quarter. A number of motives for this abandonment have been provided including the dissolution of Cahokia, increased intra- regional warfare, and environmental shifts associated with the onslaught of the Little Ice Age (Meeks 2006; Cobb and Butler 2002; Williams 1983, 1990). This two sides of the continium is important since it gives us a more microscopic glimpse of what was being played out in the larger pan-Mississippian stage. Regional and temporal refinements that are currently in progress gives us a unique perspective into the similarities and differences in which Tennessee Mississippian societies reacted to this unstable period.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Beyond the Obvious: Identifying Patterns in Coles Creek Mortuary Data
    Looking Beyond the Obvious: Identifying Patterns in Coles Creek Mortuary Data Megan C. Kassabaum University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill [Paper presented at the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Charlotte, N.C., 2008] Two characteristics of prehistoric societies in the southeastern United States are commonly used to support arguments for the presence of chiefly political and social organization. One of these characteristics is the large-scale construction of earthworks (particularly large platform mound and plaza complexes); the other is the employment of elaborate mortuary ceremonialism and sumptuous burial goods. Some claim that the earliest indications of chiefdoms can be recognized in the indigenous Coles Creek tradition of southwestern Mississippi and east-central Louisiana. Around A.D. 700, people in this region began building large-scale earthworks similar to those of later, decidedly hierarchical Mississippian polities. However, previous investigators of mortuary remains from these Coles Creek sites report a paucity of burial goods and absence of ornate individual burials (Ford 1951; Giardino 1977; Neuman 1984). Due to the distinct presence of one traditional marker for hierarchical social organization and the reported lack of another, the issue of Coles Creek social differentiation remains a paradox for Southeastern archaeologists. While a relatively small number of Coles Creek sites have been satisfactorily excavated, further analysis of data from these previous archaeological investigations may still reveal significant
    [Show full text]
  • Reference # Resource Name Address County City Listed Date Multiple
    Reference # Resource Name Address County City Listed Date Multiple Name 76001760 Arnwine Cabin TN 61 Anderson Norris 19760316 92000411 Bear Creek Road Checking Station Jct. of S. Illinois Ave. and Bear Creek Rd. Anderson Oak Ridge 19920506 Oak Ridge MPS 92000410 Bethel Valley Road Checking Station Jct. of Bethel Valley and Scarboro Rds. Anderson Oak Ridge 19920506 Oak Ridge MPS 91001108 Brannon, Luther, House 151 Oak Ridge Tpk. Anderson Oak Ridge 19910905 Oak Ridge MPS 03000697 Briceville Community Church and Cemetery TN 116 Anderson Briceville 20030724 06000134 Cross Mountain Miners' Circle Circle Cemetery Ln. Anderson Briceville 20060315 10000936 Daugherty Furniture Building 307 N Main St Anderson Clinton 20101129 Rocky Top (formerly Lake 75001726 Edwards‐‐Fowler House 3.5 mi. S of Lake City on Dutch Valley Rd. Anderson 19750529 City) Rocky Top (formerly Lake 11000830 Fort Anderson on Militia Hill Vowell Mountain Rd. Anderson 20111121 City) Rocky Top (formerly Lake 04001459 Fraterville Miners' Circle Cemetery Leach Cemetery Ln. Anderson 20050105 City) 92000407 Freels Cabin Freels Bend Rd. Anderson Oak Ridge 19920506 Oak Ridge MPS Old Edgemoor Rd. between Bethel Valley Rd. and Melton Hill 91001107 Jones, J. B., House Anderson Oak Ridge 19910905 Oak Ridge MPS Lake 05001218 McAdoo, Green, School 101 School St. Anderson Clinton 20051108 Rocky Top (formerly Lake 14000446 Norris Dam State Park Rustic Cabins Historic District 125 Village Green Cir. Anderson 20140725 City) 75001727 Norris District Town of Norris on U.S. 441 Anderson Norris 19750710 Tennessee Valley Authority Hydroelectric 16000165 Norris Hydrolectric Project 300 Powerhouse Way Anderson Norris 20160412 System, 1933‐1979 MPS Roughly bounded by East Dr., W.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 4. Tennessee Radiocarbon Dates by County Site # Common
    Table 4. Tennessee Radiocarbon Dates by County Site # Common Name(s) Lab # B.P. S.D. Reference # TNDATE Protected 1 1st Unnamed Cave AA-15810 260 50 161:57 0001 Protected 1 1st Unnamed Cave Beta-103531 380 50 162:52 0002 Protected 1 2nd Unnamed Cave AA-15811 970 60 162:52 0003 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5067 4350 60 162:52; 163:669 0004 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5064 3115 65 162:52; 163:669 0005 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-96624 3060 50 162:52; 163:669 0006 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-114172 2970 40 162:52; 163:669 0007 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-114173 2970 40 162:52; 163:669 0008 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5066 2950 65 162:52; 163:669 0009 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-96623 2950 110 162:52; 163:669 0010 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5063 2805 75 162:52; 163:669 0011 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5065 2745 75 162:52; 163:669 0012 Protected 1 5th Unnamed Cave Beta-106695 2030 50 162:52 0013 Protected 1 6th Unnamed Cave Beta-109675 1890 50 162:52 0014 Protected 1 6th Unnamed Cave Beta-106697 630 50 162:52 0015 Protected 1 7th Unnamed Cave Beta-106698 1320 40 162:52 0016 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-13937 1030 90 160:149 0017 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-13938 620 150 160:149 0018 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-126032 750 60 160:149 0019 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-126033 680 60 160:149 0020 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-131221 560 60 160:149 0021 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta 134981 780 40 160:149 0022 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-134982 890 60 160:149 0023
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Caries As an Archaeological Problem-Solving Tool: Reconstructing Subsistence Patterns in Late Prehistoric West- Central Tennessee
    51 Dental Caries as an Archaeological Problem-Solving Tool: Reconstructing Subsistence Patterns in Late Prehistoric West- Central Tennessee Maria Ostendorf Smith1* and Tracy K. Betsinger2 1 Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Illinois State University 2 Department of Anthropology, SUNY Oneonta Keywords: Mississippian, maize, dental caries, carious lesions, Tennessee ABSTRACT The dentition from two Middle Mississippian period (~AD 1100-1350) site samples (Gray Farm [~AD 1100-1350], Link/Slayden [~AD 1100-1400]) from the Kentucky Lake Reservoir of west- central Tennessee area are examined for caries prevalence by tooth type, lesion size, and crown-root location to assess whether a maize-intensive subsistence economy is evident. Given the paucity of local archaeological context, comparative caries prevalence and pattern operate as a critical archaeological problem-solving tool. The Middle Mississippian samples are compared to a Kentucky Lake Late Wood- land period (~AD 400-900) horticulturist site sample (Hobbs) as well as three unequivocal maize- intensive agriculturalist site samples from the Late Mississippian period of East Tennessee (~AD 1300- 1550). The caries patterns (tooth type, location, size) in the Gray Farm sample is consistently not statisti- cally different from the maize-intensive samples; Link/Slayden is consistently statistically different and resembles the caries pattern and prevalence of the Hobbs sample. The adoption of maize as a primary cultigen in the Kentucky Lake Reservoir is evidently geographically variable.
    [Show full text]