The Mississippian Transition at the Washausen Site: Demography and Community at a Tenth-Eleventh Century A.D. Mound Town in the American Bottom, Illinois

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Mississippian Transition at the Washausen Site: Demography and Community at a Tenth-Eleventh Century A.D. Mound Town in the American Bottom, Illinois THE MISSISSIPPIAN TRANSITION AT THE WASHAUSEN SITE: DEMOGRAPHY AND COMMUNITY AT A TENTH-ELEVENTH CENTURY A.D. MOUND TOWN IN THE AMERICAN BOTTOM, ILLINOIS by Casey R. Barrier A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in the University of Michigan 2014 Assistant Professor Robin Andrew Beck, Chair Professor Joyce Marcus Professor Carla M. Sinopoli Associate Professor Michael Witgen © Casey R. Barrier 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I could not have written this dissertation without the guidance, support, and assistance of numerous individuals and institutions. First of all, I would like to thank my PhD advisor, Rob Beck, who has provided unwavering support to me during the last several years. Rob has been the kind of advisor that has allowed me to grow as an archaeologist, scholar, colleague, and professional. From the first day Rob became my mentor at the University of Michigan, he challenged me to view myself as a more than just a graduate student. I would not be where I’m at today without Rob Beck. I also would like to thank my other committee members, Joyce Marcus and Carla Sinopoli, as well as Michael Witgen from the Department of History and Program in American Culture. These individuals helped guide me through the long journey of dissertation research and writing. I could not have finished this project without their full support. My seven years in Ann Arbor as a PhD student at the University of Michigan could never be replaced. The Department of Anthropology and especially the Museum of Anthropology are truly special institutions. I want to thank all of my professors and fellow graduate students. I have had the honor to learn from Rob Beck, Kent Flannery, Joyce Marcus, John O’Shea, Carla Sinopoli, John Speth, Bob Whallon, Henry Wright, and Norm Yoffee. I have also learned so very much from my peers – fellow graduate students at the University of Michigan. I cannot list them all, but the following individuals have been especially important: Alice Wright, Colin Quinn, Anne Compton, Ashley “Shooby” Schubert, Christina ii Perry Sampson, Travis Williams, Shaun Lynch, Andy Gurstelle, Cameron Gokee, Howard Tsai, Amanda Logan, Jess Beck, Andy White, Ryan Hughes, and Perry Sherouse. Alice Wright deserves special mention. Alice is not only one of the best archaeologists that I know, but she instantly became my best friend at Michigan. I am truly lucky to have Alice as a life-long friend and colleague! I would also like to very much thank my MA advisor while at the University of Alabama, John Blitz. John has been an inspiration to me for many years, and he continues to provide support and guidance for me to this day. There are also several people who helped me early on that I would like to thank. Two of my earliest mentors were Jim Fenton and Chris Gunn. I had the pleasure to work for several years for Jim at Wilbur Smith Associates, a CRM firm in Lexington, Kentucky. I learned from Jim that archaeology was more than just about excavations, survey, or artifact description. I learned from Jim that archaeology could and should always be anthropology! Chris Gunn took me under his wing as a young undergraduate student at the University of Kentucky, and he showed me how to become a junior professional- scholar. Chris – thanks for spending so many countless hours teaching me how to devise research, write grant proposals, analyze ceramics, and write reports, conference papers, and articles. And perhaps most of all, thanks for showing me that archaeology should always be enjoyable and done with good friends! There are also a handful of individuals that I met while in the MA program at the University of Alabama who are truly irreplaceable: Jera Davis, Paul Noe, Alissa Lamb, Blakely Brooks, Elizabeth Davis, James Stavely, Shelly Hines-Brooks, and Jenny Williams. These individuals created the perfect graduate school experience for me during those two years spent in iii Tuscaloosa. More importantly, they became life-long friends that I will forever consider my close family and do whatever possible to keep close by. There are also several people from my CRM days who should be thanked. These individuals taught me how to do fieldwork, and they strengthened my early conviction that archaeology should always be a fun endeavor, and one done with good friends. Again, I cannot list them all, but the following people need special mention: Tracey Sandefur, Pat Trader, Robert Ball, Howard Beverly, Kurt Rademaker, Dave Buskiewicz, Dona Daugherty, Myrissa Byrd, Ann Wilkinson, Crista Haag, Steve Culler, Courtney Stoll, and Tanya Peres. I would not be where I am today with the loving support and guidance of my family. My parents, David and Janis Barrier, and my sister, Stacey, have always been there for me since Day 1. I cannot thank them enough for everything they give me; all I can do is say, “I love you!” My wife, Sarah Mulberry, is not only my biggest supporter, but she is also my closest friend. Anyone who knows Sarah understands how she is responsible for making me something more than just an archaeologist. Sarah has given me the gift of having a rich and fulfilling life. I only hope I can give back to her half of what she’s given to me. Sarah – thanks for being a part of my life – I love you! Sarah’s parents, John and Janice Mulberry, have also provided to me their full support and love. I don’t really consider them my “in-laws;” they’re just part of my family. And one more member of my family must be named – my Labrador Retriever and best friend, Orwell. Orwell has been with me throughout the entire journey of graduate school, and I know he’ll be right by my side going forward! The research for this dissertation could not have been conducted without the full support of many individuals. I would like to especially thank John and Lucretia “Cricket” Kelly for all they have done for me. John and Cricket made Monroe County, Illinois, feel like home while I iv was in the field. Katie Parker and Sarah Sherwood also deserve special thanks for their support and guidance. Tim Horsley, my close friend and colleague, cannot be thanked enough. Tim is the best archaeo-geophysicist I know, and I know of no one with a bigger heart! I would also like to very much thank the landowners of the Washausen site, the Hawkins family, as well as “Mo.” They made fieldwork at Washausen a true pleasure. Also, I could not have done any of this work without the assistance of many people both in the field and in the lab, including: Kevin Garrett, Shaun Lynch, Ashley Schubert, James Scott, Jim Mertz, Kathryn Clappison, Danielle Bridges, Casey Sreenan, Sophia Reini, and Fred Gee. Institutional support was essential for this research project. Primary funding was provided by a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant (BCS- 1339216), and by a James Bennett Griffin Fellowship. Other funding was provided by the University of Michigan’s Museum of Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, and Rackham Graduate School. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………………….ii LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………………...vii LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………………..ix ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………...…......x CHAPTER 1. THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF KIN-BASED AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES: AN EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN CASE STUDY FROM EASTERN NORTH AMERICA………………………………………………………………………….1 CHAPTER 2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND THE 2011 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-WASHAUSEN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROJECT……...………………...25 CHAPTER 3. SHIFTING COMMUNITIES: THE SPATIAL ORGANIZATION AND DEMOGRAPHIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE WASHAUSEN COMMUNITY.............45 CHAPTER 4. THE 2011 UM-WAP FIELD INVESTIGATIONS AT WASHAUSEN……77 CHAPTER 5. FEAST, FAMILY, AND FIELD: COMMUNITY CONSTRUCTION DURING THE MISSISSIPPIAN TRANSITION AT WASHAUSEN………………….138 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………………………………………………………...160 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1. Map of the American Bottom region, with sites mentioned in text highlighted…....14 Figure 1.2. American Bottom chronology (calibrated dates) (adapted from Kelly 2008:Figure 37)…………………………………………………………………………………………….16 Figure 2.1. Photograph of Washausen site locality (foreground) in the American Bottom, with tree-covered limestone bluffs in background (photograph by author)………………………..26 Figure 2.2. 1875 plat map showing location of the Washausen site (red star) along the banks of Fountain Creek prior to construction of the modern levee…………………………………...26 Figure 2.3. Contour map of the Washausen site (courtesy of John Kelly)……………………...32 Figure 2.4. Photographs showing Mound A (top) and Mound B (bottom) at the Washausen site, outlined in red (photograph by author)……………………………………………………….33 Figure 3.1 Gray-scale of processed magnetometer data, plotted from -3.5 nT (white) to +3.5 nT (black) (from the 2011 UM-WAP geophysical survey)……………………………………...47 Figure 3.2. Gray-scale of processed magnetometer data, displaying secondary plaza at Washausen……………………………………………………………………………………50 Figure 3.3. Gray-scale of processed magnetometer data, with yellow arrows referencing buried relict paleochannels…………………………………………………………………………...52 Figure 3.4. Photograph showing 1 x 2 meter unit excavated to clip the edge of a rectangular basin structure (Structure 4, Feature 26), as predicted from the magnetometer data (photograph by author)……………………………………………………………………….65 Figure 3.5. Map of the Washausen settlement, showing distribution of rectangular basin structures (black)……………………………………………………………………………...67 Figure 3.6. Graphs showing village-level demographic changes through time in the central American Bottom at the Washausen and Range Sites; data displayed for Range depict only the largest temporally discrete community for each archaeological phase as presented in Kelly (1990a:Table 9)………………………………………………………………………...74 vii Figure 4.1. Map showing location of six excavation areas..…………………………………….79 Figure 4.2. Photograph showing excavations of Structure 1 at Washausen (photograph by author)………………………………………………………………………………………...80 Figure 4.3. Profile map of Structure 1 (Feature 5) basin and fill zones (west profile)………….81 Figure 4.4.
Recommended publications
  • Mortuary Patterns in West-Central Tennessee: Contextualizing Historic Field Data from Nine Mississippian Period Sites
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 4-6-2018 Mortuary Patterns In West-Central Tennessee: Contextualizing Historic Field Data From Nine Mississippian Period Sites Brooke Adele Wamsley Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Wamsley, Brooke Adele, "Mortuary Patterns In West-Central Tennessee: Contextualizing Historic Field Data From Nine Mississippian Period Sites" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 896. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/896 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MORTUARY PATTERNS IN WEST-CENTRAL TENNESSEE: CONTEXTUALIZING HISTORIC FIELD DATA FROM NINE MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD SITES Brooke A. Wamsley 156 pages Middle Mississippian is a both a cultural and temporal (1200 CE – 1400 CE) archaeological context of Midwestern North America. This cultural tradition is associated with mound building, specific art motifs, arguably stratified societies, intensive agriculture, and specific ritual/mortuary practices. Burial sites can be very valuable to archaeologists because of the purposeful interaction between the living and the deceased and reconstruction of cultural elements such as social identity and group membership. While American archaeology continues to be fieldwork-focused, there are a considerable amount of cultural resources housed in museum collections that could provide data for research into pre-Columbian life-ways in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Investigations Into the King George
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22) Harry Gene Brignac Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brignac Jr, Harry Gene, "Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22)" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2720. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2720 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE KING GEORGE ISLAND MOUNDS SITE (16LV22) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology By Harry Gene Brignac Jr. B.A. Louisiana State University, 2003 May, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God for surrounding me with the people in my life who have guided and supported me in this and all of my endeavors. I have to express my greatest appreciation to Dr. Rebecca Saunders for her professional guidance during this entire process, and for her inspiration and constant motivation for me to become the best archaeologist I can be.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Tristram R
    December 14, 2017 Curriculum Vitae Tristram R. Kidder Edward S. and Tedi Macias Professor and Chair Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis [email protected] Lab URL: http://pages.wustl.edu/kidder Education 1988 Harvard University: Ph.D., Anthropology 1987 Harvard University: M.A., Anthropology 1982 Tulane University: B.A., Anthropology Major Field/Research Interests: Anthropological archaeology; geoarchaeology, environmental archaeology, and the archaeological study of climate change; Indian cultures of North America; the formation of hierarchical social systems, the emergence of social complexity, and complex hunter-gatherer history; historical ecology, and the relationship between climate, landscape evolution, and human social change. Teaching and Professional Experience: 2017- Visiting Professor (summer term), Teaching and Experimental Center for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Protection, School of History and Culture, Henan University, Kaifeng 2008- Chair, Department of Anthropology, Washington University 2003- Professor of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis 2003- Professor of Environmental Studies in Arts & Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis 2003 Professor of Anthropology, Tulane University 2002-2003 Interim Dean, Tulane College 1995-2003 Associate Professor of Anthropology, Tulane University 1989-2003 Director, Center for Archaeology, Tulane University 1989-1995 Assistant Professor of Anthropology, Tulane University 1988-89 Lecturer on Anthropology, Harvard University 1987-88 Instructor
    [Show full text]
  • Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site Benjamin Garrett Davis University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Benjamin Garrett, "Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1570. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1570 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOUSEHOLDS AND CHANGING USE OF SPACE AT THE TRANSITIONAL EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN AUSTIN SITE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of Mississippi by BENJAMIN GARRETT DAVIS May 2019 ABSTRACT The Austin Site (22TU549) is a village site located in Tunica County, Mississippi dating to approximately A.D. 1150-1350, along the transition from the Terminal Late Woodland to the Mississippian period. While Elizabeth Hunt’s (2017) masters thesis concluded that the ceramics at Austin emphasized a Late Woodland persistence, the architecture and use of space at the site had yet to be analyzed. This study examines this architecture and use of space over time at Austin to determine if they display evidence of increasing institutionalized inequality. This included creating a map of Austin based on John Connaway’s original excavation notes, and then analyzing this map within the temporal context of the upper Yazoo Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Doi 10136
    <ennewick Man--Ames chapter http://www.cr.nps.gov/aad/design/'kennewick/AMES.HTM IARCHEOLOG¥ _z ETHNOGRAPHY PROGRAM Peoples&gultures Kennewick Man Chapter 2 CulturalAffiliationReport Section1 Review of the Archaeological Data Kenneth A_ Ames Acknowledgments Alexander GalE,Stephanie Butler and ,Ion Daehnke, all of Introduction Portland State University, gave me invaluable assistance in the production of this document. They assisted me with :: scopeofWorkand library research, the bibliography, data bases and so on and Methodology on. However, neither they, nor any of the people with whom :: ,_:,rganizatiofonthis I consulted on this work (see list below) bear any Report responsibilities for errors, ideas, or conclusions drawn here. -he _',:,Ghem ,',ColumL_ia) That responsibility is solely mine. Plat _aU Background =s-:uesProodem Introd uction "EartierGroup" This report is part of the cultural affiliation study, under NAGPRA, of the Kennewick human remains. The ._.r,:haeologvortheEarly circumstances of the finding of those remains, and the Modern Period: The Other resulting controversies, are well enough known not to EndoftheSequence require rehearsal here. The present work reviews the extant Reviewd the archaeological record for the Southern Columbia Plateau Archaeological Record: (sensu Ames et al. 1998) (Figure 1). Continuities, Discontinuities an:Ga s Scope of Work and Methodology Cotlclusions The framework for this study is set out in the scope of work Bibliography (SOW) dated December 9, 1999. It is important to be quite explicit about what the scope of work and the parameters of LiaofFigures this study are. Therefore, in summarizing the SoW, I either closely paraphrase its wording, or quote extensively. The project's scope of work included: • "Identify an "earlier group" with which the Kennewick human remains could be associated.
    [Show full text]
  • 62Nd Annual Midwest Archaeological Conference October 4–6, 2018 No T R E Dame Conference Center Mc Kenna Hall
    62nd Annual Midwest Archaeological Conference October 4–6, 2018 No t r e Dame Conference Center Mc Kenna Hall Parking ndsp.nd.edu/ parking- and- trafǢc/visitor-guest-parking Visitor parking is available at the following locations: • Morris Inn (valet parking for $10 per day for guests of the hotel, rest aurants, and conference participants. Conference attendees should tell t he valet they are here for t he conference.) • Visitor Lot (paid parking) • Joyce & Compt on Lot s (paid parking) During regular business hours (Monday–Friday, 7a.m.–4p.m.), visitors using paid parking must purchase a permit at a pay st at ion (red arrows on map, credit cards only). The permit must be displayed face up on the driver’s side of the vehicle’s dashboard, so it is visible to parking enforcement staff. Parking is free after working hours and on weekends. Rates range from free (less than 1 hour) to $8 (4 hours or more). Campus Shut t les 2 3 Mc Kenna Hal l Fl oor Pl an Registration Open House Mai n Level Mc Kenna Hall Lobby and Recept ion Thursday, 12 a.m.–5 p.m. Department of Anthropology Friday, 8 a.m.–5 p.m. Saturday, 8 a.m.–1 p.m. 2nd Floor of Corbett Family Hall Informat ion about the campus and its Thursday, 6–8 p.m. amenities is available from any of t he Corbett Family Hall is on the east side of personnel at the desk. Notre Dame Stadium. The second floor houses t he Department of Anthropology, including facilities for archaeology, Book and Vendor Room archaeometry, human osteology, and Mc Kenna Hall 112–114 bioanthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Brett R. Lenz
    COLONIZER GEOARCHAEOLOGY OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION A Dissertation DR. BRETT R. LENZ COLONIZER GEOARCHAEOLOGY OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION, NORTH AMERICA Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester By Brett Reinhold Lenz Department of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester June 2011 1 DEDICATION This work is dedicated to Garreck, Haydn and Carver. And to Hank, for teaching me how rivers form. 2 Abstract This dissertation involves the development of a geologic framework applied to upper Pleistocene and earliest Holocene archaeological site discovery. It is argued that efforts to identify colonizer archaeological sites require knowledge of geologic processes, Quaternary stratigraphic detail and an understanding of basic soil science principles. An overview of Quaternary geologic deposits based on previous work in the region is presented. This is augmented by original research which presents a new, proposed regional pedostratigraphic framework, a new source of lithic raw material, the Beezley chalcedony, and details of a new cache of lithic tools with Paleoindian affinities made from this previously undescribed stone source. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The list of people who deserve my thanks and appreciation is large. First, to my parents and family, I give the greatest thanks for providing encouragement and support across many years. Without your steady support it would not be possible. Thanks Mom and Dad, Steph, Jen and Mellissa. To Dani and my sons, I appreciate your patience and support and for your love and encouragement that is always there. Due to a variety of factors, but mostly my own foibles, the research leading to this dissertation has taken place over a protracted period of time, and as a result, different stages of my personal development are likely reflected in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Before Albany
    Before Albany THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of the University ROBERT M. BENNETT, Chancellor, B.A., M.S. ...................................................... Tonawanda MERRYL H. TISCH, Vice Chancellor, B.A., M.A. Ed.D. ........................................ New York SAUL B. COHEN, B.A., M.A., Ph.D. ................................................................... New Rochelle JAMES C. DAWSON, A.A., B.A., M.S., Ph.D. ....................................................... Peru ANTHONY S. BOTTAR, B.A., J.D. ......................................................................... Syracuse GERALDINE D. CHAPEY, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. ......................................................... Belle Harbor ARNOLD B. GARDNER, B.A., LL.B. ...................................................................... Buffalo HARRY PHILLIPS, 3rd, B.A., M.S.F.S. ................................................................... Hartsdale JOSEPH E. BOWMAN,JR., B.A., M.L.S., M.A., M.Ed., Ed.D. ................................ Albany JAMES R. TALLON,JR., B.A., M.A. ...................................................................... Binghamton MILTON L. COFIELD, B.S., M.B.A., Ph.D. ........................................................... Rochester ROGER B. TILLES, B.A., J.D. ............................................................................... Great Neck KAREN BROOKS HOPKINS, B.A., M.F.A. ............................................................... Brooklyn NATALIE M. GOMEZ-VELEZ, B.A., J.D. ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Beyond the Obvious: Identifying Patterns in Coles Creek Mortuary Data
    Looking Beyond the Obvious: Identifying Patterns in Coles Creek Mortuary Data Megan C. Kassabaum University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill [Paper presented at the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Charlotte, N.C., 2008] Two characteristics of prehistoric societies in the southeastern United States are commonly used to support arguments for the presence of chiefly political and social organization. One of these characteristics is the large-scale construction of earthworks (particularly large platform mound and plaza complexes); the other is the employment of elaborate mortuary ceremonialism and sumptuous burial goods. Some claim that the earliest indications of chiefdoms can be recognized in the indigenous Coles Creek tradition of southwestern Mississippi and east-central Louisiana. Around A.D. 700, people in this region began building large-scale earthworks similar to those of later, decidedly hierarchical Mississippian polities. However, previous investigators of mortuary remains from these Coles Creek sites report a paucity of burial goods and absence of ornate individual burials (Ford 1951; Giardino 1977; Neuman 1984). Due to the distinct presence of one traditional marker for hierarchical social organization and the reported lack of another, the issue of Coles Creek social differentiation remains a paradox for Southeastern archaeologists. While a relatively small number of Coles Creek sites have been satisfactorily excavated, further analysis of data from these previous archaeological investigations may still reveal significant
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 157Th Meeting of the National Park System Advisory Board November 4-5, 2015
    NORTHEAST REGION Boston National Historical Park 157th Meeting Citizen advisors chartered by Congress to help the National Park Service care for special places saved by the American people so that all may experience our heritage. November 4-5, 2015 • Boston National Historical Park • Boston, Massachusetts Meeting of November 4-5, 2015 FEDERAL REGISTER MEETING NOTICE AGENDA MINUTES Meeting of May 6-7, 2015 REPORT OF THE SCIENCE COMMITTEE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE URBAN AGENDA REPORT ON THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC VALUATION STUDY OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ACTIONS ON ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS • Planning for a Future National Park System • Strengthening NPS Science and Resource Stewardship • Recommending National Natural Landmarks • Recommending National Historic Landmarks • Asian American Pacific Islander, Latino and LGBT Heritage Initiatives • Expanding Collaboration in Education • Encouraging New Philanthropic Partnerships • Developing Leadership and Nurturing Innovation • Supporting the National Park Service Centennial Campaign REPORT OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMITTEE PLANNING A BOARD SUMMARY REPORT MEETING SITE—Boston National Historical Park, Commandant’s House, Charlestown Navy Yard, Boston, MA 02139 617-242-5611 LODGING SITE—Hyatt Regency Cambridge, 575 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 62139 617-492-1234 / Fax 617-491-6906 Travel to Boston, Massachusetts, on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 Hotel Check in 4:00 pm Check out 12:00 noon Hotel Restaurant: Zephyr on the Charles / Breakfast 6:30-11:00 am / Lunch 11:00 am - 5:00 pm / Dinner 5-11:00 pm Room Service: Breakfast 6:00 am - 11:00 am / Dinner 5:00 pm - 11:00 pm Wednesday NOVEMBER 4 NOTE—Meeting attire is business. The tour will involve some walking and climbing stairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Caries As an Archaeological Problem-Solving Tool: Reconstructing Subsistence Patterns in Late Prehistoric West- Central Tennessee
    51 Dental Caries as an Archaeological Problem-Solving Tool: Reconstructing Subsistence Patterns in Late Prehistoric West- Central Tennessee Maria Ostendorf Smith1* and Tracy K. Betsinger2 1 Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Illinois State University 2 Department of Anthropology, SUNY Oneonta Keywords: Mississippian, maize, dental caries, carious lesions, Tennessee ABSTRACT The dentition from two Middle Mississippian period (~AD 1100-1350) site samples (Gray Farm [~AD 1100-1350], Link/Slayden [~AD 1100-1400]) from the Kentucky Lake Reservoir of west- central Tennessee area are examined for caries prevalence by tooth type, lesion size, and crown-root location to assess whether a maize-intensive subsistence economy is evident. Given the paucity of local archaeological context, comparative caries prevalence and pattern operate as a critical archaeological problem-solving tool. The Middle Mississippian samples are compared to a Kentucky Lake Late Wood- land period (~AD 400-900) horticulturist site sample (Hobbs) as well as three unequivocal maize- intensive agriculturalist site samples from the Late Mississippian period of East Tennessee (~AD 1300- 1550). The caries patterns (tooth type, location, size) in the Gray Farm sample is consistently not statisti- cally different from the maize-intensive samples; Link/Slayden is consistently statistically different and resembles the caries pattern and prevalence of the Hobbs sample. The adoption of maize as a primary cultigen in the Kentucky Lake Reservoir is evidently geographically variable.
    [Show full text]