DOCSLIB.ORG

Culture Under Fire: Armed Non-State Actors and Cultural Heritage in Wartime Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Culture Under Fire: Armed Non-State Actors and Cultural Heritage in Wartime Table of Contents CULTURE UNDER FIRE: ARMED NON-STATE ACTORS AND CULTURAL HERITAGE IN WARTIME TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 ABOUT GENEVA CALL ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................................ 7 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. Background ............................................................................................................................................................................ 8 2. Study rationale, literature review and methodology .................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 1: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................... 12 1. INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (IHL) .............................................................................................................. 13 1.1. Treaty Law ....................................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1.1. The 1954 Hague Convention ............................................................................................................................ 13 1.1.1.1. Obligations of ANSAs under the 1954 Hague Convention .......................................................... 13 1.1.1.2. Limitations of the 1954 Hague Convention vis-à-vis ANSAs ........................................................ 14 1.1.2. The 1999 Second Protocol ................................................................................................................................ 16 1.1.2.1. Precautions against the effects of hostilities ................................................................................ 16 1.1.2.2. Precautions in attack ........................................................................................................................... 17 1.1.2.3. Respect for cultural property and the test of “imperative military necessity” ....................... 17 1.1.2.4. The enhanced protection regime ...................................................................................................... 17 1.1.2.5. Sanctions ................................................................................................................................................. 18 1.1.3. The 1977 Additional Protocol II to the 1949 Geneva Conventions .......................................................... 19 1.2. Customary International Humanitarian Law ............................................................................................................ 19 1.2.1. The principle of distinction .............................................................................................................................. 20 1.2.2. The principle of precaution ............................................................................................................................. 20 1.2.3. The principle of proportionality ...................................................................................................................... 20 1.2.4. Specific customary rules on the protection of cultural heritage ............................................................. 20 1.2.5. The Hague Regulations .................................................................................................................................... 21 2. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW .................................................................................................................................... 21 2.1. Individual criminal responsibility ............................................................................................................................ 22 2.2. The doctrine of command responsibility .............................................................................................................. 23 3. OTHER SOURCES OF CULTURAL HERITAGE LAW ........................................................................................................ 24 3.1. The 1970 UNESCO Convention ................................................................................................................................... 24 3.2. The 1972 World Heritage Convention ..................................................................................................................... 24 3.3. The 2003 Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention .............................................................................................. 25 3.4. The 2005 UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions .......................................................................................................................... 26 4. INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ......................................................................................................................... 26 4.1 The human right to participate in cultural life ........................................................................................................ 26 4.2. Cultural heritage within other human rights .......................................................................................................... 27 5. OTHER RELEVANT INSTRUMENTS .................................................................................................................................. 27 5.1. UN Security Council Resolutions ............................................................................................................................... 27 5.2. The 2003 UNESCO Declaration Concerning the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage ................... 28 5.3. Abu Dhabi Declaration on heritage at risk in the context of armed conflicts ................................................. 29 CULTURE UNDER FIRE: ARMED NON-STATE ACTORS AND CULTURAL HERITAGE IN WARTIME 2 CHAPTER 2: ANSAs ATTITUDES TOWARDS CULTURAL HERITAGE ............................................................................ 30 1. DESTRUCTIVE AND NON-DESTRUCTIVE TRENDS ......................................................................................................... 31 1.1. The destructive trend ..................................................................................................................................................... 31 1.2. The non-destructive trend ............................................................................................................................................. 33 2. CASE STUDIES ......................................................................................................................................................................... 36 2.1. Mali .................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 2.1.1. Context .................................................................................................................................................................... 36 2.1.2. ANSAs and cultural heritage in Mali .................................................................................................................. 36 2.1.3. International legal framework ........................................................................................................................... 38 2.1.4. Domestic legal framework .................................................................................................................................. 39 2.2. Iraq ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 40 2.2.1. Context .................................................................................................................................................................... 40 2.2.2. ANSAs and cultural heritage in Iraq .................................................................................................................. 40 2.2.3. International legal framework ........................................................................................................................... 42 2.2.4. Domestic legal framework .................................................................................................................................. 43 2.3. Syria .................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Or the Unacceptable Lightness of “Historicism”
    The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Or the Unacceptable Lightness of “Historicism” Davor Marijan War Museum, Zagreb, Republic of Croatia Abstract The author in this study does not intend to provide a comprehensive account of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in part because the cur- rent level of research does not enable this. The only way to understand this conflict is through facts, not prejudices. However, such prejudices are particularly acute amongst Muslim-Bosniac authors. They base their claims on the notion that Serbs and Croats are the destroyers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and that both are equally culpable in its destruction. Relying on mainly unpublished and uncited documents from the three constitutive nations of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the author factually chal- lenges basic and generally accepted claims. The author offers alternative responses to certain claims and draws attention to the complexity of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which has been mainly viewed in terms of black or white. The author does, however, suggest that in considering the character of the war it is necessary to examine first the war in Croatia and the inter-relationship between the two. The main focus is on 1992 and the Muslim and Croat differences that developed into open conflict at the beginning of 1993. The role of the international community in the war and the partition of Bosnia and Herzegovina are also discussed. At the end of the 20th century in Europe and the eclipse of Communism from the world political scene, it is not easy to trace the indelible marks left behind after the collapse of Yugoslavia and the wars that ensued.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:10-Cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 40
    Case 1:10-cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GENOCIDE VICTIMS ) OF KRAJINA, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 1:10-CV- _____ ) L-3 COMMUNICATIONS ) Corp. and ) MPRI, Inc., ) JURY DEMAND ) Class Action ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Genocide Victims of Krajina, including Milena Jovic and Zivka Mijic, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, for their Complaint against Defendants L-3 Communications Corp. (“L-3”) and MPRI, Inc. (“MPRI”), allege the following: Nature of the Action 1. This is a class action brought by ethnic Serbs who resided in the Krajina region of Croatia up to August 1995 and who then became victims of the Croatian military assault known as Operation Storm—an aggressive, systematic military attack and bombardment on a demilitarized civilian population that had been placed under the protection of the United Nations. Operation Storm was designed to kill or forcibly expel the ethnic Serbian residents of the Krajina region -1- Case 1:10-cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 2 of 40 from Croatian territory, just because they were a minority religio-ethnic group. Defendant MPRI, a private military contractor subsequently acquired by Defendant L-3 Communications Inc., trained and equipped the Croatian military for Operation Storm and designed the Operation Storm battle plan. Operation Storm became the largest land offensive in Europe since World War II and resulted in the murder and inhumane treatment of thousands of ethnic Serbs, the forced displacement of approximately 200,000 ethnic Serbs from their ancestral homes in Croatian territory, and the pillaging and destruction of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Serbian-owned property.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom House, Its Academic Advisers, and the Author(S) of This Report
    Croatia by Tena Prelec Capital: Zagreb Population: 4.17 million GNI/capita, PPP: $22,880 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores NIT Edition 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Democratic 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.75 Governance Electoral Process 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3 3 3 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Independent Media 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.25 4.25 Local Democratic 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Governance Judicial Framework 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 and Independence Corruption 4.5 4.5 4.25 4 4 4 4 4.25 4.25 4.25 Democracy Score 3.71 3.71 3,64 3.61 3.61 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.71 3.75 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The Democracy Score is an average of ratings for the categories tracked in a given year.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Aspects of the Croatian Community of Herceg-Bosna
    Book review Miljenko Brekalo (Croatia) Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar – Local center Osijek CONSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS OF THE CROATIAN COMMUNITY OF HERCEG-BOSNA Abstract The political context in which the Croatian Community of Herceg-Bosna came to be was defined by two political moments – an expressed desire of the Serbian people to join Great Serbia on the one hand and the Muslim (Bosnian) attempt to create a concept of a unified BiH where an ethnic-territorial Bosnian majority would be present on the other. In such circumstances, the official policy of the Republic of Croatia, especially the one by the first president dr. Franjo Tuđman, was unfoundedly prescribed by the Great Serbia policy and Bosnian fundamentalism with a basic thesis that he, along with Milošević, “divided” Bosnia and Herzegovina on meetings in Karađorđevo and Tikveš. However, that thesis is rebuttable on two bases. Firstly, the carriers for the idea of Great Serbia with Milošević were “armed to the neck” by the military arsenal of the JNA. Secondly, the democratic rule in Croatia with Tuđman at its forefront was very poorly armed, forced to buy very expensive weaponry on the “black market”: According to this, Milošević needed no military-political agreement on BiH. At that time, the fall of Vukovar and the occupation of one third of the national territory of Croatia point to the fact that there is no basis for the thesis on the “division” of BiH between Tuđman and Milošević. In order to better grasp the constitutional aspects of the Croatian Community of Herceg-Bosna i.e. its creation, existence and disappearance, this paper will show the legal analysis and portray the content of the book by the constitutional judge dr.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Media Coverage of ICTY Verdicts in Croatian and Serbian Media
    How (not) to reconcile: An analysis of media coverage of ICTY verdicts in Croatian and Serbian media by Sara Ana Cemazar Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Dr. Oana Lup CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2018 Abstract This thesis investigates media coverage of International Criminal Court for former Yugoslavia’s verdicts in Croatia and Serbia in three cases. This Court was established to deal with atrocities committed during conflict between these two countries in the 1990-es and it set out to perpetrate the guilty. By using thematic and framing analysis on more than 250 articles in four newspapers, it can be seen that the observed verdicts to Gotovina et al., Karadzic and Prlic et al. were perceived ambivalently in two countries, which extends to the ongoing duality of narratives present in understanding common history between Croatia and Serbia. If the verdict’s outcome was perceived as favorable to the country, it was portrayed as just in the media, and vice versa. Given that this Court’s indirect aims were to individualize guilt and facilitate reconciliation, this study argues that this was not achieved. Namely, by media reporting that helped encourage collectivity of the guilt or innocence as an outcome of a verdict to an individual, reconciliation process between two nations was not made easier. CEU eTD Collection i Acknowledgements Since my MA Thesis marks the culmination of my education so far, I must acknowledge many people that have helped me on this way.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary on the Judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) of 29 November 2017 (Case No
    Białostockie Studia Prawnicze 2018 vol. 23 nr 3 DOI: 10.15290/bsp.2018.23.03.09 Sławomir Redo Academic Council on the United Nations System [email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-4217 Commentary on the Judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) of 29 November 2017 (Case No. IT-04-74-T)1 I. Th is criminological commentary has been rendered on the grounds of the following facts. In case of Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić, Bruno Stojić, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj Petković, Valentin Ćori ć and Berislav Pusić, the six Croat alleged war criminals before the Tribunal were charged with crimes that met its Statute’s disposition concerning the alleged acting of participating in a Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE). According to the bill of indictment, its goal was to permanently remove the Muslim population from Herceg-Bosna. All six defendants entered a ‘not guilty’ to each of the 26 off ences brought against them. In particular, all the defendants denied the displacement and/or confi nement of civilians, murder and destruction of property during attacks, ill-treatment and criminal damage during eviction operations, ill-treatment and harsh conditions in detention, the wide-spread and almost systematic use of detainees to carry out work on the frontline and even to serve as human shields at times, as well as murder and ill-treatment associated with this work and with the use of human shields and, fi nally, the displacement of detainees and their families from the territory of Herceg-Bosna following their release.
    [Show full text]
  • State Party Report
    Ministry of Culture Directorate General of Antiquities & Museums STATE PARTY REPORT On The State of Conservation of The Syrian Cultural Heritage Sites (Syrian Arab Republic) For Submission By 1 February 2018 1 CONTENTS Introduction 4 1. Damascus old city 5 Statement of Significant 5 Threats 6 Measures Taken 8 2. Bosra old city 12 Statement of Significant 12 Threats 12 3. Palmyra 13 Statement of Significant 13 Threats 13 Measures Taken 13 4. Aleppo old city 15 Statement of Significant 15 Threats 15 Measures Taken 15 5. Crac des Cchevaliers & Qal’at Salah 19 el-din Statement of Significant 19 Measure Taken 19 6. Ancient Villages in North of Syria 22 Statement of Significant 22 Threats 22 Measure Taken 22 4 INTRODUCTION This Progress Report on the State of Conservation of the Syrian World Heritage properties is: Responds to the World Heritage on the 41 Session of the UNESCO Committee organized in Krakow, Poland from 2 to 12 July 2017. Provides update to the December 2017 State of Conservation report. Prepared in to be present on the previous World Heritage Committee meeting 42e session 2018. Information Sources This report represents a collation of available information as of 31 December 2017, and is based on available information from the DGAM braches around Syria, taking inconsideration that with ground access in some cities in Syria extremely limited for antiquities experts, extent of the damage cannot be assessment right now such as (Ancient Villages in North of Syria and Bosra). 5 Name of World Heritage property: ANCIENT CITY OF DAMASCUS Date of inscription on World Heritage List: 26/10/1979 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANTS Founded in the 3rd millennium B.C., Damascus was an important cultural and commercial center, by virtue of its geographical position at the crossroads of the orient and the occident, between Africa and Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Kata'ib Sayyid Al Shuhada
    Kata’ib Sayyid al Shuhada Name: Kata’ib Sayyid al Shuhada Type of Organization: Militia political party religious social services provider terrorist transnational violent Ideologies and Affiliations: Iranian-sponsored Shiite Jihadist Khomeinist Place of Origin: Iraq Year of Origin: 2013 Founder(s): Abu Mustafa al Sheibani Places of Operation: Iraq, Syria Overview Also Known As Kata’ib Abu Fadl al-Abbas1 Kata’ib Karbala2 Battalion of the Sayyid’s Martyrs3 Executive Summary Kata’ib Sayyid al Shuhada (KSS) is an Iraqi militia that has fought in both Iraq and Syria and is closely connected to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the Houthis.4 Its leader is Abu Mustafa al Sheibani, a U.S.-designated terrorist who also assisted in forming the IRGC-backed Asaib Ahl al-Haq (AAH) and Kata’ib Hezbollah (KH) militias.5 The group was founded in 2013. Its first public announcements were three martyrdom notices for members killed fighting in southern Damascus alongside Syrian regime forces.6 In Syria, KSS operates within the fold of the mixed Syrian and Iraqi Liwa Abu Fadl al-Abbas, another Iranian- backed militia.7 KSS follows the same Shiite jihadist ideology as fellow pro-Iranian Iraqi militias, framing its fight in Syria as a defense of Shiites and the Shiite shrine of Sayyida Zaynab.8 In a 2013 interview, KSS’s information office stated that the group sent 500 militants to Syria.9 Other media Kata’ib Sayyid al Shuhada statements have affirmed the presence of KSS fighters in rural Damascus along the frontlines in eastern Ghouta.10 The Associated Press has reported that KSS fighters enter Syria via Iran.11 In 2015, KSS declared Saudi Arabia “a legitimate and permissible target” after that country executed a prominent Shiite cleric.12 A 2018 KSS statement indicated the group was ready to send fighters to Yemen.
    [Show full text]
  • From Battlefield to Ballot Box: Contextualising the Rise and Evolution of Iraq’S Popular Mobilisation Units
    From Battlefield to Ballot Box: Contextualising the Rise and Evolution of Iraq’s Popular Mobilisation Units By Inna Rudolf CONTACT DETAILS For questions, queries and additional copies of this report, please contact: ICSR King’s College London Strand London WC2R 2LS United Kingdom T. +44 20 7848 2098 E. [email protected] Twitter: @icsr_centre Like all other ICSR publications, this report can be downloaded free of charge from the ICSR website at www.icsr.info. © ICSR 2018 From Battlefield to Ballot Box: Contextualising the Rise and Evolution of Iraq’s Popular Mobilisation Units Contents List of Key Terms and Actors 2 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 9 Chapter 1 – The Birth and Institutionalisation of the PMU 11 Chapter 2 – Organisational Structure and Leading Formations of Key PMU Affiliates 15 The Usual Suspects 17 Badr and its Multi-vector Policy 17 The Taming of the “Special Groups” 18 Asa’ib Ahl al-Haqq – Righteousness with Benefits? 18 Kata’ib Hezbollah and the Iranian Connection 19 Kata’ib Sayyid al-Shuhada – Seeking Martyrdom in Syria? 20 Harakat Hezbollah al-Nujaba – a Hezbollah Wannabe? 21 Saraya al-Khorasani – Tehran’s Satellite in Iraq? 22 Kata’ib Tayyar al-Risali – Iraqi Loyalists with Sadrist Roots 23 Saraya al-Salam – How Rebellious are the Peace Brigades? 24 Hashd al-Marji‘i – the ‘Holy’ Mobilisation 24 Chapter 3 – Election Manoeuvring 27 Betting on the Hashd 29 Chapter 4 – Conclusion 33 1 From Battlefield to Ballot Box: Contextualising the Rise and Evolution of Iraq’s Popular Mobilisation Units List of Key Terms and Actors AAH:
    [Show full text]
  • Herein Is to Be Reproduced Or Adapted to Other Works Without the Expressed Written Consent of the Editors of the Journal of Middle Eastern Politics and Policy
    Journal of Middle Eastern Politics and Policy A Harvard Kennedy School student publication Beyond Borders: Middle East In Empire, Diaspora, And Global Transitions This issue is dedicated to the tenth anniversary of the Syrian revolution Spring 2021 Journal of Middle Eastern Politics and Policy Beyond Borders: Middle East In Empire, Diaspora, And Global Transitions This issue is dedicated to the tenth anniversary of the Syrian revolution Spring 2021 Spring 2020 i Staff Editor in Chief Associate Editors Reilly Barry Michael Johns, Jr. – Regional Security & Iran Gilad Kabilo – Military-Security & Israel Managing Editor Joseph Leone – Levant Ghazi Ghazi Xuechen Wang – Gulf Senir Staff Writer Mouhanad Al Rifay Staff Writers Christina Bouri Sumaya Malas Copyright The Journal of Middle Eastern Politics and Policy does not accept responsibility for the views expressed by individual authors. No part of the publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form without the expressed written consent of the editors of the Journal of Middle Eastern Politics and Policy. © 2021 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. Except as otherwise specified, no article or portion herein is to be reproduced or adapted to other works without the expressed written consent of the editors of the Journal of Middle Eastern Politics and Policy. ii Journal of Middle East Politics and Policy Acknowledgements Martha Foley, Publisher Richard Parker, Faculty Advisor Tanner Jensen, Copy Editor Lilliana Ballesteros, Layout Design The Journal of Middle Eastern Politics and Policy would like to thank a number of individuals and institutions whose support proved invaluable to the production of this edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Syria: Playing Into Their Hands
    Syria Playing into their hands Regime and international roles in fuelling violence and fundamentalism in the Syrian war DAVID KEEN Syria Playing into their hands Regime and international roles in fuelling violence and fundamentalism in the Syrian war DAVID KEEN About the author David Keen is a political economist and Professor of Conflict Studies at the London School of Economics (LSE), where he has worked since 1997. He is the author of several books on conflict and related problems, includingUseful Enemies, Complex Emergencies, Endless War? and The Benefits of Famine. Saferworld published a discussion paper by Professor Keen in 2015 entitled Dilemmas of counter-terror, stabilisation and statebuilding, on which this paper builds. Acknowledgements This discussion paper was commissioned as part of Saferworld’s work to challenge counterproductive responses to crises and critical threats and promote peacebuilding options. It has been managed and edited by Larry Attree and Jordan Street for Saferworld. Very valuable comments and advice, on all or parts of the text, were additionally provided by Rana Khalaf, Henry Smith, Fawaz Gerges, Rajesh Venugopal, Stuart Gordon, Paul Kingston, Sune Haugbolle, Leonie Northedge, Shelagh Daley and David Alpher. Any errors are solely the responsibility of the author. The author is grateful to Mary Kaldor at LSE for supporting the fieldwork component of this research, funded by the European Research Council. I am particularly grateful to Ali Ali for his guidance and inside knowledge during fieldwork on the Turkey-Syria border and for subsequent comments. Some people have helped greatly with this report who cannot be individually acknowledged for security reasons and my sincere gratitude extends to them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Postwar Reconstruction of Destroyed Historic Zone in Aleppo
    THE POSTWAR RECONSTRUCTION OF DESTROYED HISTORIC ZONE IN ALEPPO Students Barışcan Özen Tarık Rasim Nomer Supervisor Prof. Domenico Chizzoniti IMAGE THE POSTWAR RECONSTRUCTION OF DESTROYED HISTORIC ZONE IN ALEPPO Supervisor: Prof. Domenico Chizzoniti Co-Supervisors Prof.Stefano Cusatelli Arch. Flavio Menici Thesis: Barışcan Özen mat: 871178 Tarık Rasim Nomer mat: 873402 INDEX 07 The evolution process of the city 11 The Ancient Era | 3500 b.C. – 312 b.C. 13 Hellenistic-Roman Time | 312 b.C. – 325 a.C. 18 Byzantine Time | 395 a.C. – 634 a.C. 21 Islamic Times | 636 a.C. – 1516 a.C. 30 Ottoman Times | 1516 a.C. – 1918 a.C. 35 Current Times | 1918 a.C. – 2011 a.C. 41 Typological Analysis of the Old City 43 Accessibility and urban patterns 48 The Souk 54 The other main types 64 The courtyard 67 Architectural elements 75 The current condition of the city 77 The Syrian civil war 85 Aleppo’s reconstruction 99 Project Proposal 100 Abstract 101 Project Proposal 111 General Properties 120 Drawings of Project Proposal 154 Bibliography 158 Table of figures 5 The evolution process of the city From ancient time to present day The eternal city, Aleppo, is one of the few ci- sical period. In the course of time, an Islamic ties among the Syrian “first-born” that are still scheme was superimposed on the classical teeming with life. It has been perpetuated than- one, and the city today is the result of this su- ks to its immutable and tight traces, in which perimposition. Thus, different developing sy- exchanges took place in response to needs stem, like the
    [Show full text]