DOCSLIB.ORG

Notice of Filing of Revised Public Redacted Version of Slobodan Praljak’S Appeal Brief with Annexes ______

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notice of Filing of Revised Public Redacted Version of Slobodan Praljak’S Appeal Brief with Annexes ______ IT-04-74-A 17811 A17811 - A17633 29 July 2015 MB THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-04-74-A Original: English APPEALS CHAMBER Before : Judge Theodor Meron, Presiding Judge Carmel Agius Judge Fausto Pocar Judge Liu Daqun Judge Bakone Justice Moloto Registrar : Mr. John Hocking Filed: 29 July 2015 THE PROSECUTOR v. JADRANKO PRLI Ć BRUNO STOJI Ć SLOBODAN PRALJAK MILIVOJ PETKOVI Ć VALENTIN ĆORI Ć BERISLAV PUŠI Ć PUBLIC _______________________________________________________ NOTICE OF FILING OF REVISED PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION OF SLOBODAN PRALJAK’S APPEAL BRIEF WITH ANNEXES ___________________________________________ The Office of the Prosecutor Mr Douglas Stringer Ms Laurel Baig Ms Barbara Goy Counsel for the Accused: Mr Michael Karnavas and Ms Suzana Tomanovi ć for Jadranko Prli ć Ms Senka Nožica and Mr Karim A. A. Khan for Bruno Stoji ć Ms Nika Pinter and Ms Natacha Fauveau Ivanovic for Slobodan Praljak Ms Vesna Alaburi ć and Mr Guénaël Mettraux for Milivoj Petkovi ć Ms Dijana Tomašegovi ć-Tomi ć and Mr Dražen Plavec for Valentin Ćori ć Mr Fahrudin Ibrišimovi ć and Mr Roger Sahota for Berislav Puši ć IT-04-74-A 17810 1 NOTICE OF FILING OF REVISED PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION OF SLOBODAN PRALJAK’S APPEAL BRIEF WITH ANNEXES In accordance with the Appeals Chamber Decision (the “Decision”)1, Slobodan Praljak Defence (the “Defence”) files the Revised Public Redacted Version 2 of its Appeal Brief with Annexes 3. The redactions have been made, according to directions indicated in Decision and after consultations with the Prosecution, in order to protect confidential information (identity of protected witnesses and content of confidential documents). Respectfully submitted, By Nika Pinter and Natacha Fauveau Ivanovic Counsel for the Accused Slobodan Praljak Word Count: 155 1 Decision on the Prosecution Urgent Motion to Reclassify Public Briefs and Modify the Public Redacted Briefing Schedule, issued on 8 July 2015; 2 Annex, Revised Public Redacted Version of Slobodan Praljak’s Appeal Brief with Annexes; 3 Slobodak Praljak’s Appeal Brief with Annexes filed confidentially on 12 January 2015. Case No. IT-04-74-A Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prli ć, et al. 29 July 2015 IT-04-74-A 17809 Public ANNEX Case No. IT-04-74-A Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prli ć, et al. 29 July 2015 IT-04-74-A 17808 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-04-74-A Original: English APPEALS CHAMBER Before : Judge Theodor Meron, Presiding Judge Carmel Agius Judge Fausto Pocar Judge Liu Daqun Judge Bakone Justice Moloto Registrar : Mr. John Hocking Filed: 12 January 2015 THE PROSECUTOR v. JADRANKO PRLI Ć BRUNO STOJI Ć SLOBODAN PRALJAK MILIVOJ PETKOVI Ć VALENTIN ĆORI Ć BERISLAV PUŠI Ć PUBLIC _______________________________________________________ SLOBODAN PRALJAK’S REVISED PUBLIC REDACTED APPEAL BRIEF WITH ANNEXES ___________________________________________ The Office of the Prosecutor Mr Douglas Stringer Mr Mathias Marcussen Counsel for the Accused: Mr Michael Karnavas and Ms Suzana Tomanovi ć for Jadranko Prli ć Ms Senka Nožica and Mr Karim A. A. Khan for Bruno Stoji ć Ms Nika Pinter and Ms Natacha Fauveau Ivanovic for Slobodan Praljak Ms Vesna Alaburi ć and Mr Guénaël Mettraux for Milivoj Petkovi ć Ms Dijana Tomašegovi ć-Tomi ć and Mr Dražen Plavec for Valentin Ćori ć Mr Fahrudin Ibrišimovi ć and Mr Roger Sahota for Berislav Puši ć IT-04-74-A 17807 1 Public SLOBODAN PRALJAK’S REVISED PUBLIC REDACTED APPEAL BRIEF WITH ANNEXES I. INTRODUCTION 1. On 29-05-2013, the TC rendered its Judgment in Case n°IT-04-74, the Prosecutor v. Slobodan Praljak (the “Judgment”). The TC found Praljak (the “Accused”) guilty of the following crimes: - Persecutions, a CAH pursuant to Art.5(h) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-1); - Murder, a CAH pursuant to Art.5(a) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-2); - Willful killing, a grave breach of the GC, pursuant to Art.2 (a) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-3); - Deportation, a CAH pursuant to Art.5(d) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-6); - Unlawful deportation of a civilian, a grave breach of the GC, pursuant to Art.2(g) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-7); - Inhumane acts (forcible transfer), a CAH pursuant to Art.5(i) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-8); - Unlawful transfer of a civilian, a grave breach of the GC, pursuant to articles 2(g) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-9); - Imprisonment, a CAH, pursuant to Art.5(e) and 7.1 of the Statute of the Tribunal (Count-10); - Unlawful confinement of a civilian, a grave breach of the GC, pursuant to Art.2(g) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-11); - Inhumane acts (conditions of confinement), a CAH, pursuant to Art.5(i) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-12); - Inhuman treatment (conditions of confinement), a grave breach of the GC, pursuant to Art.2(b) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-13); - Inhumane acts, CAH, pursuant to Art.5(i) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-15); Case No. IT-04-74-A Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prli ć, et al. 12 January 2015 IT-04-74-A 17806 2 Public - Inhuman treatment, a grave breach of the GC pursuant to Art.2(b) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-16); - Unlawful labor, a VLCW, pursuant to Art.3 and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-18); - extensive destruction of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly, a grave breach of the GC pursuant to Art.2(d) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-19); - destruction or willful damage done to institutions dedicated to religion or education, a VLCW, pursuant to Art.3(d) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-21); - appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly, a grave breach of the GC pursuant to Art.2(d) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-22); - plunder of public or private property, a VLCW, pursuant to Art.3(e) and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-23); - unlawful attack on civilians, a VLCW, pursuant to Art.3 and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-24); and - unlawful infliction of terror on civilians, a VLCW of war, pursuant to Art.3 and 7.1 of the Statute (Count-25).1 2. The TC sentenced the Accused to a single term of 20-year imprisonment sentence.2 3. On 28-06-2013, the Praljak Defence (the “Defence”) filed the Notice of Appeal. 4. In light of the errors identified in its Notice and pursuant to Art.25 of the Statute and R.111 of the Rules, the Defence files this Appeal Brief. 5. All errors of law indicated in this Brief are of such nature and importance that they render the Judgment invalid. All references to general principles of law comprise the presumption of innocence, in dubio pro reo and onus probandi incombit actori. Whenever the TC acted in violation of general principles of law it also acted in violation of Art.21.3 and 23.2 of the Statute and of R.87(A) of the Rules. 1 J,Disposition,Vol-IV,p.446; 2 J,Disposition,Vol-IV,pp.446-447; Case No. IT-04-74-A Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prli ć, et al. 12 January 2015 IT-04-74-A 17805 3 Public 6. All errors of fact indicated in this Brief led to a denial of justice. Due to these errors, the TC drew erroneous conclusions which no trier of fact could have reasonably reached on the basis of the evidence on the record. II. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL 1st Ground: Errors related to the IAC 7. All errors indicated in this Ground render the conviction of the Accused pursuant to Art.2 of the Statute null and void. For all the reasons set forth in the 1 st Ground, the Judgment should be reversed on Count-3, Count-7, Count-9, Count-11, Count-13, Count-16, Count-19 and Count-22 and Praljak should be acquitted of these charges. 1.1. The TC made an error of fact when it concluded that the south front mentioned in documents issued by the HV 3 covered a part of the HZ(R)H-B4 8. The TC omitted to consider that during the period, covered by the Indictment, the Croatia was in war and that southern part of its territory was cut from the rest of the Croatian territory and under constant threat from Serbian forces. Therefore, the TC failed to acknowledge that the southern front covered the Croatian territory situated in coastal area south of Split and spreading from Split to Dubrovnik and Prevlaka. 5 9. While the HV units were sometimes obliged to use border areas in BiH, they did it with the sole purpose to defend the territory of the RC,6 the territory which they naturally and legitimately defended. 7 The objective of these actions was to mount a defence against the VRS/JNA/JA and not to launch an attack on Bosnian population (Muslim/Serbian), since the frontline was in Dubrovnik. 8 10. The Croatian territory in the area of southern front is so narrow, with 5-kilometer average wide, that any military intervention, limited to the Croatian territory, was almost impossible. 9 3 P03677, P11033; 4 J.Vol-III,para.529; 5 Praljak,T.41628,T.43014,T.44546; SkenderT.45254; BenetaT.46698; JasakT.48632; 6 BenetaT.46564,T.46668-46669; Praljak,T.39877,T.41821, PetkovicT.49302; 7 PraljakT.43014; 8 J.Vol-VI,Diss.Op,p.10; 9 BenetaT.46572,T.46573; PraljakT.39877; Case No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Or the Unacceptable Lightness of “Historicism”
    The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Or the Unacceptable Lightness of “Historicism” Davor Marijan War Museum, Zagreb, Republic of Croatia Abstract The author in this study does not intend to provide a comprehensive account of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in part because the cur- rent level of research does not enable this. The only way to understand this conflict is through facts, not prejudices. However, such prejudices are particularly acute amongst Muslim-Bosniac authors. They base their claims on the notion that Serbs and Croats are the destroyers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and that both are equally culpable in its destruction. Relying on mainly unpublished and uncited documents from the three constitutive nations of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the author factually chal- lenges basic and generally accepted claims. The author offers alternative responses to certain claims and draws attention to the complexity of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which has been mainly viewed in terms of black or white. The author does, however, suggest that in considering the character of the war it is necessary to examine first the war in Croatia and the inter-relationship between the two. The main focus is on 1992 and the Muslim and Croat differences that developed into open conflict at the beginning of 1993. The role of the international community in the war and the partition of Bosnia and Herzegovina are also discussed. At the end of the 20th century in Europe and the eclipse of Communism from the world political scene, it is not easy to trace the indelible marks left behind after the collapse of Yugoslavia and the wars that ensued.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:10-Cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 40
    Case 1:10-cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GENOCIDE VICTIMS ) OF KRAJINA, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 1:10-CV- _____ ) L-3 COMMUNICATIONS ) Corp. and ) MPRI, Inc., ) JURY DEMAND ) Class Action ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Genocide Victims of Krajina, including Milena Jovic and Zivka Mijic, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, for their Complaint against Defendants L-3 Communications Corp. (“L-3”) and MPRI, Inc. (“MPRI”), allege the following: Nature of the Action 1. This is a class action brought by ethnic Serbs who resided in the Krajina region of Croatia up to August 1995 and who then became victims of the Croatian military assault known as Operation Storm—an aggressive, systematic military attack and bombardment on a demilitarized civilian population that had been placed under the protection of the United Nations. Operation Storm was designed to kill or forcibly expel the ethnic Serbian residents of the Krajina region -1- Case 1:10-cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 2 of 40 from Croatian territory, just because they were a minority religio-ethnic group. Defendant MPRI, a private military contractor subsequently acquired by Defendant L-3 Communications Inc., trained and equipped the Croatian military for Operation Storm and designed the Operation Storm battle plan. Operation Storm became the largest land offensive in Europe since World War II and resulted in the murder and inhumane treatment of thousands of ethnic Serbs, the forced displacement of approximately 200,000 ethnic Serbs from their ancestral homes in Croatian territory, and the pillaging and destruction of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Serbian-owned property.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom House, Its Academic Advisers, and the Author(S) of This Report
    Croatia by Tena Prelec Capital: Zagreb Population: 4.17 million GNI/capita, PPP: $22,880 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores NIT Edition 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Democratic 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.75 Governance Electoral Process 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3 3 3 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Independent Media 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.25 4.25 Local Democratic 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Governance Judicial Framework 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 and Independence Corruption 4.5 4.5 4.25 4 4 4 4 4.25 4.25 4.25 Democracy Score 3.71 3.71 3,64 3.61 3.61 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.71 3.75 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The Democracy Score is an average of ratings for the categories tracked in a given year.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Aspects of the Croatian Community of Herceg-Bosna
    Book review Miljenko Brekalo (Croatia) Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar – Local center Osijek CONSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS OF THE CROATIAN COMMUNITY OF HERCEG-BOSNA Abstract The political context in which the Croatian Community of Herceg-Bosna came to be was defined by two political moments – an expressed desire of the Serbian people to join Great Serbia on the one hand and the Muslim (Bosnian) attempt to create a concept of a unified BiH where an ethnic-territorial Bosnian majority would be present on the other. In such circumstances, the official policy of the Republic of Croatia, especially the one by the first president dr. Franjo Tuđman, was unfoundedly prescribed by the Great Serbia policy and Bosnian fundamentalism with a basic thesis that he, along with Milošević, “divided” Bosnia and Herzegovina on meetings in Karađorđevo and Tikveš. However, that thesis is rebuttable on two bases. Firstly, the carriers for the idea of Great Serbia with Milošević were “armed to the neck” by the military arsenal of the JNA. Secondly, the democratic rule in Croatia with Tuđman at its forefront was very poorly armed, forced to buy very expensive weaponry on the “black market”: According to this, Milošević needed no military-political agreement on BiH. At that time, the fall of Vukovar and the occupation of one third of the national territory of Croatia point to the fact that there is no basis for the thesis on the “division” of BiH between Tuđman and Milošević. In order to better grasp the constitutional aspects of the Croatian Community of Herceg-Bosna i.e. its creation, existence and disappearance, this paper will show the legal analysis and portray the content of the book by the constitutional judge dr.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Media Coverage of ICTY Verdicts in Croatian and Serbian Media
    How (not) to reconcile: An analysis of media coverage of ICTY verdicts in Croatian and Serbian media by Sara Ana Cemazar Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Dr. Oana Lup CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2018 Abstract This thesis investigates media coverage of International Criminal Court for former Yugoslavia’s verdicts in Croatia and Serbia in three cases. This Court was established to deal with atrocities committed during conflict between these two countries in the 1990-es and it set out to perpetrate the guilty. By using thematic and framing analysis on more than 250 articles in four newspapers, it can be seen that the observed verdicts to Gotovina et al., Karadzic and Prlic et al. were perceived ambivalently in two countries, which extends to the ongoing duality of narratives present in understanding common history between Croatia and Serbia. If the verdict’s outcome was perceived as favorable to the country, it was portrayed as just in the media, and vice versa. Given that this Court’s indirect aims were to individualize guilt and facilitate reconciliation, this study argues that this was not achieved. Namely, by media reporting that helped encourage collectivity of the guilt or innocence as an outcome of a verdict to an individual, reconciliation process between two nations was not made easier. CEU eTD Collection i Acknowledgements Since my MA Thesis marks the culmination of my education so far, I must acknowledge many people that have helped me on this way.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary on the Judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) of 29 November 2017 (Case No
    Białostockie Studia Prawnicze 2018 vol. 23 nr 3 DOI: 10.15290/bsp.2018.23.03.09 Sławomir Redo Academic Council on the United Nations System [email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-4217 Commentary on the Judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) of 29 November 2017 (Case No. IT-04-74-T)1 I. Th is criminological commentary has been rendered on the grounds of the following facts. In case of Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić, Bruno Stojić, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj Petković, Valentin Ćori ć and Berislav Pusić, the six Croat alleged war criminals before the Tribunal were charged with crimes that met its Statute’s disposition concerning the alleged acting of participating in a Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE). According to the bill of indictment, its goal was to permanently remove the Muslim population from Herceg-Bosna. All six defendants entered a ‘not guilty’ to each of the 26 off ences brought against them. In particular, all the defendants denied the displacement and/or confi nement of civilians, murder and destruction of property during attacks, ill-treatment and criminal damage during eviction operations, ill-treatment and harsh conditions in detention, the wide-spread and almost systematic use of detainees to carry out work on the frontline and even to serve as human shields at times, as well as murder and ill-treatment associated with this work and with the use of human shields and, fi nally, the displacement of detainees and their families from the territory of Herceg-Bosna following their release.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Croatian Wikipedia: Encyclopaedia of Knowledge Or Encyclopaedia for the Nation?
    The Case of Croatian Wikipedia: Encyclopaedia of Knowledge or Encyclopaedia for the Nation? 1 Authorial statement: This report represents the evaluation of the Croatian disinformation case by an external expert on the subject matter, who after conducting a thorough analysis of the Croatian community setting, provides three recommendations to address the ongoing challenges. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Wikimedia Foundation. The Wikimedia Foundation is publishing the report for transparency. Executive Summary Croatian Wikipedia (Hr.WP) has been struggling with content and conduct-related challenges, causing repeated concerns in the global volunteer community for more than a decade. With support of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees, the Foundation retained an external expert to evaluate the challenges faced by the project. The evaluation, conducted between February and May 2021, sought to assess whether there have been organized attempts to introduce disinformation into Croatian Wikipedia and whether the project has been captured by ideologically driven users who are structurally misaligned with Wikipedia’s five pillars guiding the traditional editorial project setup of the Wikipedia projects. Croatian Wikipedia represents the Croatian standard variant of the Serbo-Croatian language. Unlike other pluricentric Wikipedia language projects, such as English, French, German, and Spanish, Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia’s community was split up into Croatian, Bosnian, Serbian, and the original Serbo-Croatian wikis starting in 2003. The report concludes that this structure enabled local language communities to sort by points of view on each project, often falling along political party lines in the respective regions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Entity – a Fiction? by Erich Rathfelder
    The third entity – a fiction? By Erich Rathfelder While Bosnia and Herzegovina is already dysfunctional with its two entities, the Croat Member of the Presidency, Dragan Čović, is striving for a third entity. This project is following the para-state “Herceg-Bosna,“ which was carrying out ethnic cleansing during the Bosnian War. In a first step, Čović is trying to undermine the functionality of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina by an Electoral Law reform. Slowly it was calming down in the almost full small lecture hall in the Culture Centre Kosača in Mostar on October 3, 2017. The approximately 100 people present were looking curiously at the podium, where Miroslav Tuđman, the son of the first President of the Republic of Croatia, was taking place to present his new book published in 2017 in Zagreb. The former head of the Croatian Secret Service, extremely resembling his father Franjo Tuđman, had to be patient for a little while though. Because, as customary in this region, several speakers first praised the author as a brilliant analyst and a great Croatian patriot. Indeed, the mind-set of Miroslav Tuđman provides important insight into the position of Croatian nationalism in Croatia and in Bosnia and Herzegovina. His book Druga strana rubikona – politička strategija Alije Izetbegovića [The Other Side of the Rubicon – Alija Izetbegović’s Political Strategy] strives to be a settlement with the former President of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which gained its independence from Yugoslavia in the spring of 1992. But not only that: It contains a fundamental positioning of Croatian nationalism and provides the background for the current politics of the Croatian Democratic Union of Bosnia and Herzegovina (HDZ-BiH).
    [Show full text]
  • Miccweb Cases Selection and Procedure
    Expanding Educational Content on War Crime Trial Narratives in the Western Balkans: The Cases Selection Procedure & Outcome The investigative educational research project "Expanding Educational Content on War Crime Trial Narratives in the Western Balkans" is funded under BIRN's Balkan Transitional Justice Programme. The goal M O D E L I N T E R N A T I O N A L of the research project is to investigate International Criminal Tribunal C R I M I N A L C O U R T for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) archives and to identify and develop as W E S T E R N B A L K A N S educational content two additional legal cases that would be implemented at the MICCWeB sessions from 2020-onward. The research project is divided into four phases: M I C C W E B (1) Preliminary Analysis of ICTY Archives & Pre-Selection of Legal Cases January - March, 2020 (2) Expert Review Committee Survey, Outcome & Cases Final Selection April - July, 2020 (3) Legal Simulation Cases Development & Materials Synthesis August - September, 2020 (4) Development of Two Lesson Plans Inspired by the New Cases September - October, 2020 Annex I specifies the process and work carried out during Phase 1. This document describes the process and work carried out during Phase 2, i.e. the Expert Review Committee survey, results, and final cases selection. Please note that prior to kicking off the Phase 3, BIRN input and www.webalkans.org approval is required for the two cases that were selected/suggested for development by the MICCWeB Expert Review Committee team.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecution of Crimes of Appropriation of Private Property Before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
    Awarded Theses 2018/2019 Jasenka Ferizović Prosecution of Crimes of Appropriation of Private Property before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals erma, European Regional Master’s Programme in Democracy and Human Rights in South East Europe JASENKA FERIZOVI PROSECUTION OF CRIMES OF APPROPRIATIONć OF PRIVATE PROPERTY BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA AND THE INTERNATIONAL RESIDUAL MECHANISM FOR CRIMINAL TRIBUNALS JASENKA FERIZOVI ć FOREWORD The Global Campus of Human Rights is a unique network of more than one hundred participating universities around the world, seeking to advance human rights and democracy through regional and global cooperation for education and research. This global network is promoted through seven Regional Programmes which are based in Venice for Europe, in Sarajevo/Bologna for South East Europe, in Yerevan for the Caucasus, in Pretoria for Africa, in Bangkok for Asia- Pacific, in Buenos Aires for Latin America and the Caribbean, and in Beirut for the Arab World. Every year each regional master’s programmes select the best master thesis of the previous academic year that is published online as part of the GC publications. The selected seven GC master theses cover a range of different international human rights topics and challenges. The Global Campus Awarded Theses of the academic year 2018/2019 are: • Begalieva, Nuriza, From Democracy to Autocracy? Growing Threats to Civil Society and Media in Kyrgyzstan, Supervisor: Arusyak Aleksanyan, Yerevan State University. Master’s Programme in Human Rights and Democratisation in the Caucasus (CES), coordinated by Yerevan State University • El-Hawary, Nouran Refugees ad Migrant Access to Health in Transit Countries: Politics of Adaptability, Enactment of Slow Death and Inevitability of Pain: an Ethnography of Poor Urban Neighborhood in Rabat (Morocco), Supervisor: Jeremy Gunn, International University of Rabat (UIR).
    [Show full text]
  • Lipanj 2020. POVIJESNO-KULTURNA KNJIŽNA GRAĐA U KNJIŽNICI
    UDK: 016:930.85 027.7(497.6 Sarajevo) Pregledni rad Primljeno: lipanj 2020. Milenko KREŠIĆ Katolički bogoslovni fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu J. Stadlera 5 BiH – 71 000 Sarajevo [email protected] POVIJESNO-KULTURNA KNJIŽNA GRAĐA U KNJIŽNICI KATOLIČKOG BOGOSLOVNOG FAKULTETA U SARAJEVU Sažetak: Uz uvod, u kojem se donosi kratak prikaz povijesti knjižnice KBF-a u Sarajevu i njezina knjižnog blaga, autor u radu opisuje ciljeve i ishode projekta „Povijesno-kultur- na ostavština na vjerskim učilištima u Bosni i Hercegovini“ koji je financijski pomoglo Ministarstvo obrazovanja i znanosti FBiH. Projekt je trajao godinu dana, od siječnja 2019. do siječnja 2020. Kroz projekt je prikupljena, klasificirana i analitički obrađena knjižna građa povezana s povijesno-kulturnom tematikom u knjižnici KBF-a te obrađena u sustavu COBISS. Posebna pozornost obraćena je starijoj i rijetkoj periodici. U prilogu rada donesen je popis starije i rijetke periodike te popis dijela selektivne građe do koje se došlo pretraživanjem tematskih cjelina (ključnih riječi): baština, ostavština i kultura u kontekstu povijesnih istraživanja nakon što je građa obrađena u sustavu COBISS. Ključne riječi: Projekt, povijesno-kulturna ostavština, periodika, knjižnica, Katolički bogoslovni fakultet, COBISS. Uvod Već prvi pogled u depoe knjižnice Katoličkog bogoslovnog fakul- teta u Sarajevu daje dojam da ova knjižnica čuva bogatu povijesno-kultur- nu knjižnu baštinu. Pogleda li se u njezinu povijest, to postaje i razumljivo. Knjižnica je osnovana 1893. zajedno s najstarijom visokoškolskom usta- novom u Bosni i Hercegovini kojoj je bila na usluzi, Vrhbosanskim veli- kim sjemeništem, pretečom današnjeg Katoličkog bogoslovnog fakulteta. 426 Vrhbosnensia 24,2 (2020.) Vrhbosansko veliko sjemenište djelovalo je u kontinuitetu od 1893.
    [Show full text]
  • Selbstmord Im Gericht Wer War Der Kroatische Kriegsverbrecher Praljak?
    SWR2 Feature Selbstmord im Gericht Wer war der kroatische Kriegsverbrecher Praljak? Von Zoran Solomun und Jerko Bakotin Sendung: Mittwoch, 14. November 2018 Redaktion: Wolfram Wessels Regie: Zoran Solomun Produktion: SWR 2018 SWR2 Feature können Sie auch im SWR2 Webradio unter www.SWR2.de und auf Mobilgeräten in der SWR2 App hören – oder als Podcast nachhören: http://www1.swr.de/podcast/xml/swr2/feature.xml Bitte beachten Sie: Das Manuskript ist ausschließlich zum persönlichen, privaten Gebrauch bestimmt. Jede weitere Vervielfältigung und Verbreitung bedarf der ausdrücklichen Genehmigung des Urhebers bzw. des SWR. Kennen Sie schon das Serviceangebot des Kulturradios SWR2? Mit der kostenlosen SWR2 Kulturkarte können Sie zu ermäßigten Eintrittspreisen Veranstaltungen des SWR2 und seiner vielen Kulturpartner im Sendegebiet besuchen. Mit dem Infoheft SWR2 Kulturservice sind Sie stets über SWR2 und die zahlreichen Veranstaltungen im SWR2-Kulturpartner-Netz informiert. Jetzt anmelden unter 07221/300 200 oder swr2.de Die neue SWR2 App für Android und iOS Hören Sie das SWR2 Programm, wann und wo Sie wollen. Jederzeit live oder zeitversetzt, online oder offline. Alle Sendung stehen sieben Tage lang zum Nachhören bereit. Nutzen Sie die neuen Funktionen der SWR2 App: abonnieren, offline hören, stöbern, meistgehört, Themenbereiche, Empfehlungen, Entdeckungen … Kostenlos herunterladen: www.swr2.de/app O-Ton Richter Sprecher 6: In Übereinstimmung mit den Forderungen der Anklage bestätigt das Gericht im Falle von Slobodan Praljak die Haftstrafe von zwanzig Jahren. Im Einklang mit der Regel 101 C wird die Zeit, die der Verurteilte im Untersuchungshaft verbracht hat, angerechnet. Herr Praljak, sie können sich setzten. O-Ton Slobodan Praljak Sprecher 1: Slobodan Praljak ist kein Kriegsverbrecher! Mit Verachtung weise ich ihr Urteil zurück! O-Ton Richter Sprecher 6: Hören Sie auf, bitte.
    [Show full text]