DOCSLIB.ORG

86 Owen Struggle for Political Representation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE STRUgglE FOR POliTICAL REPRESENTATION LABOUR CANdidATES AND THE LIBERAL PARTY, 1868 – 85 In November 1868 a leading article in The Bee-Hive, a weekly trade unionist journal, declared that ‘there is a vast amount of rottenness in the ranks of the Liberal Party which must be rooted out before the working men can expect to be treated fair and honourably in their efforts to enter the House of Commons’.1 The call for direct labour representation – understood here as the election of working-class men to parliament to represent the labour interest as Liberal MPs rather than independently – had enjoyed a broad range of support during the reform agitations illiam Gladstone, However, in the decade follow- that followed the along with several ing the 1867 Reform Act – which establishment of the Wprominent Liberal enfranchised ‘registered and resi- MPs, such as Henry Fawcett and dential’ male householders, giving Reform League in Peter Alfred Taylor, had spoken in the vote to 30 per cent of work- support of working-class parlia- ing men – the labour movement February 1865. James mentary representation, while the struggled to secure the return of Owen explores what working-class radicals in whom the their own representatives. For management of the Reform League many labour activists, at the heart happens between 1968 was vested were zealous advocates of this struggle was the unwill- for the labour movement having its ingness of the managers of local and 1885. own voice inside the Commons.2 Liberal Associations to select a 14 Journal of Liberal History 86 Spring 2015 THE STRUgglE FOR POliTICAL REPRESENTATION LABOUR CANdidATES AND THE LIBERAL PARTY, 1868 – 85 working-class man as their par- Labour candidates and the involvement in local Liberal organ- liamentary candidate.3 According Liberal Party: the 1868 general isation at this time was patchy and to one frustrated working-class election limited: there was evidence of it political campaigner, ‘if an angel Soon after the 1867 Reform Act in Rochdale and Stockport in the from heaven came down … unless was passed, the general council of 1850s and to a certain extent in Bir- he had the imprimatur of the Lib- the Reform League called for joint mingham, Leeds and Manchester in eral Association, he was unfit for action with trade unions to secure the 1860s, but these were the excep- office’. 4 This created a legacy of the return of ‘a number of work- tions.10 Popular Liberal organisa- bitterness, which manifested itself ing men proportionate to the other tion was woeful in the majority of in a number of working-class, interests and classes at present English boroughs, and at the 1868 self-styled ‘labour’ candidates represented in Parliament’.6 This general election many Liberal asso- opposing the official Liberal can- proved to be a highly problematic ciations were established simply didate at parliamentary elections. undertaking. Firstly, the Reform on an ad hoc basis. Unsurprisingly, This article examines how both League’s London headquarters those who held the purse strings sides behaved in these elections had little influence over local con- of the local associations were loath and considers what these contests stituency branches, many of which to back a working-class candidate can tell us about the nature of the had already lapsed due to inactiv- who would not be able to sustain changing relationship between ity following the passing of the himself financially if elected, and the labour movement and the Lib- Second Reform Act.7 Money was the mangers of the association, who eral Party in the third-quarter of also a major obstacle: in 1868 the zealously defended provincial inde- the nineteenth century; a period League’s finances were in a parlous pendence, looked unkindly on not which witnessed the rise of mass state.8 In the summer of 1868 How- only Reform League agents who politics and the apex of popular ell had negotiated a secret financial wished to intervene, but also the Liberalism. agreement on behalf of the Reform efforts of Glyn, who encouraged, There is an important reason to League with the Liberal chief whip, largely in vain, local party manag- look again at these contests. The George Glyn, whereby a sum of ers to embrace the new electoral current scholarly emphasis is that £1,000, supplied by the wealthy Lib- opportunities presented by the Sec- the progression from Gladstonian eral manufacturer Samuel Morley, ond Reform Act.11 Liberalism and Victorian radi- could be used to promote the estab- Only two working-class candi- calism to the embryonic Labour lishment of working-class political dates backed by the Reform League Party of the early twentieth cen- organisations that would support made it to the polls at the 1868 gen- tury was a straightforward, lin- Liberal candidates. But this pact, eral election: George Howell at ear one.5 Yet, this interpretation, and the money that underpinned it, Aylesbury and William Randal which has become something of an existed only to advance Liberal can- Cremer at Warwick. Both seats orthodoxy, overstates the conflu- didates against vulnerable sitting were double-member boroughs ence of the labour movement and Conservatives; not a penny would where only one official Liberal had Liberalism during this period. As be used to oppose a Liberal.9 been brought forward, but neither discussed below, the relationship Ultimately, the decision to bring Left: How Punch man secured the endorsement of the between the two could be tense forward a working-class candi- saw the entry local Liberal association. At Ayles- and troubled, and it could change date in the Liberal interest rested of working- bury, the Liberal candidate, Nath- depending on the political context with the managers of the local Lib- class MPs to aniel Mayer de Rothschild, was a or the locality. eral associations. Working-class Parliament local landowner who effectively Journal of Liberal History 86 Spring 2015 15 THE STRUgglE FOR POliTICAL REPRESENTATION: LABOUR CANdidATES AND THE liBERAL PARTY, 1868–85 held the purse strings of local Lib- to aggressively challenge organ- assertive rhetoric was not matched eralism. Rothschild had no wish to ised Liberalism. After failing to by organisational strength. The give either financial or vocal sup- secure the Liberal nomination, leaders of the LRL were unable to port to a trade unionist who was which went to Sir Sydney Water- secure any pledge from the Trades an outsider to the agricultural bor- low, a city banker, Odger persisted, Union Congress (TUC) in support ough.12 Glyn, in a letter to Glad- offering as an independent can- of labour representation in parlia- stone, lamented Howell’s decision didate in the labour interest.18 He ment. This failure reflected cultural to stand, writing that ‘he has unfor- stood on a solid, advanced Liberal divisions within the trade union tunately chosen the wrong place. platform, but he was implacably movement regarding the centrali- … A stranger cannot win there’.13 opposed to the moderates who ran sation of its finances. The TUC At Warwick, the president of the the Southwark Liberal Associa- frequently debated the merits of a local Reform Association wanted tion. The tension here was that the national electoral fund for parlia- full control of the Liberal nomina- obstructionist leaders of local Lib- mentary candidates, to which all tion, and effectively disabled Cre- eralism did not reflect the direc- affiliated unions would contribute, mer’s candidature by refusing to tion in which Odger felt the Liberal but, while the London-based trade provide any financial assistance.14 Party should be heading, particu- unionists behind the LRL champi- Both Howell and Cremer finished larly in regards to direct labour oned this approach, there was con- bottom of their respective polls, representation. Under the guid- sistent opposition from elsewhere, comfortably defeated by a Liberal ance of his agent, the experienced especially from delegates of the and Conservative candidate who political operator James Acland, Durham and Northumbrian min- outspent them by a ratio of three to Odger successfully courted the ers, who felt that a centralised fund one.15 Significantly, neither How- support of neighbouring Liberal would undermine their regional ell nor Cremer, in their campaign and working-men’s associations. autonomy.20 The League’s finances speeches, attacked the national Generous donations from Liberal were therefore constantly in a pre- Liberal Party. Both promised une- sympathisers also helped him to carious state and in 1873, its sec- quivocal support to Gladstone.16 avoid a nefarious attempt to derail retary, Henry Broadhurst, began But their candidatures did represent his campaign when the returning to solicit subscriptions from Lib- an important protest against the officer demanded that Odger pay eral MPs favourable to their cause, neutralisation of their chosen bor- £200 to cover his share of expenses which was hardly indicative of a ough’s voice following the decision and refused to release tickets for serious plan to go their own way.21 of the local party not to endorse a Odger’s supporters to the elec- second Liberal. tions hustings until he did so. It was The return Sir Sydney Waterlow’s intransi- Labour candidates and the gence, however, that proved fatal. of the coun- Liberal Party: the 1874 general The Labour Representation Although Odger received 4,382 try’s first two election League votes, Waterlow, who retired hours The return of the country’s first A series of electoral contests in the before polling closed, gained just working- two working-class MPs at the following five years witnessed a under 2,951, allowing the Conserv- 1874 general election underlined subtle but important shift in how ative candidate to be returned with class MPs the importance of financial sta- the labour movement articulated 4,686 votes.
Recommended publications
  • Mundella Papers Scope

    Mundella Papers Scope

    University of Sheffield Library. Special Collections and Archives Ref: MS 6 - 9, MS 22 Title: Mundella Papers Scope: The correspondence and other papers of Anthony John Mundella, Liberal M.P. for Sheffield, including other related correspondence, 1861 to 1932. Dates: 1861-1932 (also Leader Family correspondence 1848-1890) Level: Fonds Extent: 23 boxes Name of creator: Anthony John Mundella Administrative / biographical history: The content of the papers is mainly political, and consists largely of the correspondence of Mundella, a prominent Liberal M.P. of the later 19th century who attained Cabinet rank. Also included in the collection are letters, not involving Mundella, of the family of Robert Leader, acquired by Mundella’s daughter Maria Theresa who intended to write a biography of her father, and transcriptions by Maria Theresa of correspondence between Mundella and Robert Leader, John Daniel Leader and another Sheffield Liberal M.P., Henry Joseph Wilson. The collection does not include any of the business archives of Hine and Mundella. Anthony John Mundella (1825-1897) was born in Leicester of an Italian father and an English mother. After education at a National School he entered the hosiery trade, ultimately becoming a partner in the firm of Hine and Mundella of Nottingham. He became active in the political life of Nottingham, and after giving a series of public lectures in Sheffield was invited to contest the seat in the General Election of 1868. Mundella was Liberal M.P. for Sheffield from 1868 to 1885, and for the Brightside division of the Borough from November 1885 to his death in 1897.
  • Marxism and History

    Marxism and History

    THE HISTORY GROUP MARXISM AND HISTORY MEMBERSHIP OF THE HISTORY Members will have noted GROUP OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY that our bibliography is open to all members of under the above title has the Communist Party now been published. The interested in history. Committee would welcome information about errors There is an annual subscription and omissions and about of 10/-, for which members new publications (books, receive free copies of pamphlets and articles) "Our History" and of the for inclusion when the occasional publications of time arrives for the the Group, as well as notice publication of a new of all meetings, public edition. and private discussions arranged by the Group. Please note that further The Group exists to copies of "Marxism and forward the study and History" can be obtained writing of history from a from the History Group - Marxist standpoint, to price 15/- (postage 8d) put its members working in the same fields in touch with one another, and to organise discussions of mutual interest. All correspondence to! Secretary;, History Group, C.P.G.B., NON-MEMBERS OF THE GROUP 16 King Street, may subscribe to "Our London. W.C.2, History" through Central Books Limited, 37 Grays Inn Road, The Secretary would like London. W.C.I. to hear from members who are interested in local history and in the tape- 10/- per year post free. recording of interviews with Labour movement veterans who have valuable ex¬ periences to relate. THE SECOND REFORM BILL Foreword August 1967 was the centenary of the passing of the Second Reform Bill.
  • Localism in Joseph Chamberlain's Social Politics, 1869-1895. Everett Ap Rker Hall University of Massachusetts Amherst

    Localism in Joseph Chamberlain's Social Politics, 1869-1895. Everett Ap Rker Hall University of Massachusetts Amherst

    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1977 Localism in Joseph Chamberlain's Social Politics, 1869-1895. Everett aP rker Hall University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Hall, Everett aP rker, "Localism in Joseph Chamberlain's Social Politics, 1869-1895." (1977). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 1352. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/1352 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOCALISM IN JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN'S SOCIAL POLITICS, 1869-189? A Dissertation Presented by EVERETT PARKER PIALL, JR. Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 1977 History (c) EVERETT PARKER HALL, JR. 1977 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LOCALISM IN JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN'S SOCIAL POLITICS, 1869-1895 A Dissertation Presented By EVERETT PARKER HALL, JR. Approved as to style and content by Marvin Swai^tz, Cha3.rperson of Committee n /// /, / C 1-!/ ^ /it ^ 'ranklin B. ';/ickv/ire Member Michael Wolff, Member GeraldJerald McFarland, Chairman History Department ABSTRACT OF TIIE DISSERTATION Localism in Joseph Chamberlain's Social Politics, 1869-1895 Everett Parker Hall, Jr. Ph.D., University of Massachusetts, 1977 Directed by: Marvin Swartz This dissertation analyzes the Radical career of Joseph Chamberlain in terras of the social and political context in which he operated.
  • Giuseppe Mazzini's International Political Thought

    Giuseppe Mazzini's International Political Thought

    Copyrighted Material INTRODUCTION Giuseppe Mazzini’s International Political Thought Giuseppe Mazzini (1805–72) is today largely remembered as the chief inspirer and leading political agitator of the Italian Risorgimento. Yet Mazzini was not merely an Italian patriot, and his influence reached far beyond his native country and his century. In his time, he ranked among the leading European intellectual figures, competing for public atten­ tion with Mikhail Bakunin and Karl Marx, John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville. According to his friend Alexander Herzen, the Russian political activist and writer, Mazzini was the “shining star” of the dem­ ocratic revolutions of 1848. In those days Mazzini’s reputation soared so high that even the revolution’s ensuing defeat left most of his Euro­ pean followers with a virtually unshakeable belief in the eventual tri­ umph of their cause.1 Mazzini was an original, if not very systematic, political thinker. He put forward principled arguments in support of various progressive causes, from universal suffrage and social justice to women’s enfran­ chisement. Perhaps most fundamentally, he argued for a reshaping of the European political order on the basis of two seminal principles: de­ mocracy and national self­determination. These claims were extremely radical in his time, when most of continental Europe was still under the rule of hereditary kingships and multinational empires such as the Habs­ burgs and the ottomans. Mazzini worked primarily on people’s minds and opinions, in the belief that radical political change first requires cultural and ideological transformations on which to take root. He was one of the first political agitators and public intellectuals in the contemporary sense of the term: not a solitary thinker or soldier but rather a political leader who sought popular support and participa­ tion.
  • Comparative Analysis of Successful Third Parties Sean Panzer a Thesis

    Comparative Analysis of Successful Third Parties Sean Panzer a Thesis

    Comparative Analysis of Successful Third Parties Sean Panzer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies University of Washington 2013 Committee: Charles Williams Michael Allen Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Interdisciplinary Arts and Science ©Copyright 2013 Sean Panzer University of Washington Abstract Comparative Analysis of Successful Third Parties Sean Panzer Assistant Professor Dr. Charles Williams Interdisciplinary Arts and Science This thesis explores how the Republican Party (US) and the Labour Party (UK) were successful in becoming the rare examples of third parties that displaced a major party to become one of the major parties in a two-party system. In exploring this question the thesis first examines the political science ‘rules of the game’ that make it extremely difficult for third parties, followed by a historical/sociological comparative analysis of case studies of the Republican and Labour Parties to determine if there are similarities in their rise to power. The comparative analysis shows that under extreme conditions, a fundamental sociological and demographic change may occur which supports the addressing of issues that the major parties will be unable to adequately incorporate for fear of upsetting their core base supporters. It is under this context that a third party could ultimately be successful in rising to major party status. i Table of Contents Introduction …………………………………………………………………..…….... 1 Chapter I: Political Science Perspectives of Limitations on Third Parties ....….…… 7 Chapter II: Republican Party ……….……………………………………..……….… 30 Chapter III: Labour Party (UK) …………………………………………...…………. 63 Chapter IV: Conclusion …………………………………………………..…..………. 95 Bibliography …………………………………………………………………………. 102 1 Introduction As electoral results continued to roll in for the contentious 2000 presidential election, one of the presidential candidates took the opportunity to reflect upon the close nature of the results.
  • Manuscript of the Month May 2015 Chelsea Election

    Manuscript of the Month May 2015 Chelsea Election

    Manuscript of the Month May 2015 Chelsea Election: The Final Contest, satirical print, 1868 Overnight on 7th May, Returning Officers throughout the country will take centre stage as another general election reaches its climax. Within London, seventy three seats are being contested. But while the thirteen marginal constituencies command most attention, seasoned election followers are keeping a watchful eye on proceedings at Kensington, which has endured turbulent times of late. During the 1868 general election, however, Kensington was the scene of a bitterly fought contest. And in the thick of it was Sir Henry Ainslie Hoare Bt. The general election of 1868 pitted Disraeli (Conservative) against Gladstone (Liberal) for the first time. But the passing of the Reform Act a year earlier meant it took place within a dramatically altered political landscape. For not only had the electorate doubled from one to two million, but several new borough constituencies had been created, including two in London: Hackney, carved out of Tower Hamlets, and Chelsea, which encompassed Kensal Green, Fulham, Kensington and Hammersmith as well as Chelsea itself. Under the terms of the Act, Chelsea would return two MPs, while each elector was entitled to two votes. So attractive was Chelsea, with its prime location and huge electorate, that even before the Reform Bill passed into law prospective candidates had begun making their presence felt. But first to formally throw their hats into the ring were two Liberals: 24 year old Charles Wentworth Dilke, Chelsea born and bred, son of a sitting MP; and 43 year old Sir Henry Ainslie Hoare Bt, owner of the extensive Stourhead estates in Wiltshire, whose late father had been a longstanding Partner in the family banking business.
  • A History English Agricultural Labourer

    A History English Agricultural Labourer

    A HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH AGRICULTURAL LABOURER W. HASBACH Translated by Ruth Kenyon With a preface by Sidney Webb The first edition published in German by Messrs . Duncker and Humblot in 1894. TABLE OF CONTENTS. First English edition was published in 1908 by P . S . King & Son PAO E PREFACE ... ... ... ... ... v.. ... vi i . INTRODUCTION ..a ... ... ... ....... xiii . CHAPTER I . THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FREE LABOURINO CLASS ... ... Introductory ... ... ... ... ... i. The Manor as an Organisation of Labour ... ... ii . The Transition to an Organisation based on Rent ... iii . The Break-down of the Manor ... ... ... iv . The Transition Period ... ... ... ... CHAPTER I1. THE DSVELOPMENT OF AN AGRICULTURAL PROLETARIAT ... i. The Village of the Eighteenth Century before the Enclosures. the Engrossing of Farms. and the Revolution in Prices ... ... ... ... ii . The Break-up of the Village ... ... ... iii . The Position of the Labourer. 1760 to 1800 ... ... iv . Contemporary Opinion ... ... ... ... CHAPTER 111. THE DENIORALISATION OF THE LABOURER ... ... ... i. The Laws of Settlement and Removal ... ... ii . The Labourer in the period of high Corn Prices ... iii . The Labourer in the period of low Corn Prices and the old Poor Law ... ... ... ... ... iv . The Gang System ... ... ... ... ... v . Wages and Moral Conditions up to 1834 ... ... CHAPTER IV . FROM THE POOR LAW AMENDMENT ACT. 1834. TO THE EDUCATION ACTS ... ... ... ... ... i . The new Poor Law and its effects ... ... ... ii . Allotments ... ... ... ... ..a iii . The Introduction of Free Trade ... ... ... iv . The Condition of the Labourer in the Sixties ... v. The Gangs Act and the Education Acts ... ... CHAPTER V . *~RICULTURAL LABOUR UNIONS AND THE SMALL HOLDINGS MOVEMENT. 1872 to 1894 ... ... ... ... ... i . Agricult~ralLabour Unions ... ... ... (a) Introductory ... ... ... ... ... (b The Period of Triumph ..
  • The British Working Class and the General Election of 1868 1

    The British Working Class and the General Election of 1868 1

    ROYDEN HARRISON THE BRITISH WORKING CLASS AND THE GENERAL ELECTION OF 1868 1 The history of working-class politics in Britain during the last hundred years might be written in terms of changing attitudes towards Liberal- ism; a Liberalism which was continuously redefining itself as its social composition altered and political circumstances changed. Successive generations of working-class leaders attempted both to identify themselves with Liberalism and to disengage themselves from it. Those who saw the political future of labour in terms of full incorporation within the Liberal party were never left unchallenged; those who be- lieved in political independence rarely thought of that independence as involving a complete break with Liberal values. From the eighteen- sixties onwards the conflict between the desire to be assimilated and the urge to independence was continuously present within individuals as well as within movements. 11 must express my gratitude to Asa Briggs, Professor of Modern History at the University of Leeds, for his valuable criticism and encouragement. I am indebted to the Sheffield University Publications Committee for a grant which enabled me to consult materials held in the Howell Collection, Bishopsgate Institute London. Some time after this article had been completed, Mr H. J. Hanham's book, "Elections and Party Management" appeared. It was at once recognised as a work of great industry and scholarship; an important contribution to our understanding of politics in the age of Gladstone and Disraeli. It included a chapter on working class radicalism and good use was made of the manuscript volume of "Election Reports" to which I had frequently referred in the course of writing the present article.
  • Unitarian Members of Parliament in the Nineteenth Century

    Unitarian Members of Parliament in the Nineteenth Century

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stirling Online Research Repository Unitarian Members of Parliament in the Nineteenth Century A Catalogue D. W. Bebbington Professor of History, University of Stirling The catalogue that follows contains biographical data on the Unitarians who sat in the House of Commons during the nineteenth century. The main list, which includes ninety-seven MPs, is the body of evidence on which the paper on „Unitarian Members of Parliament in the Nineteenth Century‟ is based. The paper discusses the difficulty of identifying who should be treated as a Unitarian, the criterion chosen being that the individual appears to have been a practising adherent of the denomination at the time of his service in parliament. A supplementary list of supposed Unitarian MPs, which follows the main list, includes those who have sometimes been identified as Unitarians but who by this criterion were not and some who may have been affiliated to the denomination but who were probably not. The borderline is less sharp than might be wished, and, when further research has been done, a few in each list may need to be transferred to the other. Each entry contains information in roughly the same order. After the name appear the dates of birth and death and the period as an MP. Then a paragraph contains general biographical details drawn from the sources indicated at the end of the entry. A further paragraph discusses religious affiliation and activities. Unattributed quotations with dates are from Dod’s Parliamentary Companion, as presented in Who’s Who of British Members of Parliament.
  • Karl Marx and the Iwma Revisited 299 Jürgen Herres

    Karl Marx and the Iwma Revisited 299 Jürgen Herres

    “Arise Ye Wretched of the Earth” <UN> Studies in Global Social History Editor Marcel van der Linden (International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Editorial Board Sven Beckert (Harvard University, Cambridge, ma, usa) Dirk Hoerder (University of Arizona, Phoenix, ar, usa) Chitra Joshi (Indraprastha College, Delhi University, India) Amarjit Kaur (University of New England, Armidale, Australia) Barbara Weinstein (New York University, New York, ny, usa) volume 29 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/sgsh <UN> “Arise Ye Wretched of the Earth” The First International in a Global Perspective Edited by Fabrice Bensimon Quentin Deluermoz Jeanne Moisand leiden | boston <UN> This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the prevailing cc-by-nc License at the time of publication, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Cover illustration: Bannière de la Solidarité de Fayt (cover and back). Sources: Cornet Fidèle and Massart Théophile entries in Dictionnaire biographique du mouvement ouvrier en Belgique en ligne : maitron-en -ligne.univ-paris1.fr. Copyright : Bibliothèque et Archives de l’IEV – Brussels. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Bensimon, Fabrice, editor. | Deluermoz, Quentin, editor. | Moisand, Jeanne, 1978- editor. Title: “Arise ye wretched of the earth” : the First International in a global perspective / edited by Fabrice Bensimon, Quentin Deluermoz, Jeanne Moisand. Description: Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2018] | Series: Studies in global social history, issn 1874-6705 ; volume 29 | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018002194 (print) | LCCN 2018004158 (ebook) | isbn 9789004335462 (E-book) | isbn 9789004335455 (hardback : alk.
  • The London Gazette, November 20, 1868. 5997

    The London Gazette, November 20, 1868. 5997

    THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBER 20, 1868. 5997 Borough of Preston. Borough of Newcastk-under-Lyme. Edward Hermon, of Winchley-square, in the said Edmund Buckley, Esq. borough, Esq. William Shepherd Allen, Esq. Sir Thomas George . Jenner Hesketh, of Rufford Ci^y'of London. Hall, in Rufford, Lancashire, Bart. The Right Honourable George Joachim Goschen, Borough of Boston. ( Robert Wigram Crawford, John Wingfield Malcolm, of Great Stanhope- William. Lawrence, street, London, Esq. Charles Bell, Esqrs. Thomas Collins the younger, of Knaresbbrough, in the West Riding of York, Esq. City^qf Exeter. John Duke Coleridge, Esq., Q.C. Borough of Cambridge. Edgar Alfred Bowring, Esq., C.B. Robert Richard Torrens, William Fowler, Es>qrs. Borough of Bodmin. The Honourable Edward Frederick Leveson Borough'of Leicester. Gower, of Chiswick House, Middlesex, Esq. Peter Alfred Taylor, of Aubrey House, Netting Bupghs ofFortrose, Inverness, Nairn, and Forres. Hill, Middlesex,'Esq. John Dove Harris, of Katcliffe Hall, in the county Eneas William Mackintosh, of Raigmore, in the of Leicester, Esq. county of Inverness, Esq. Borough of Rochdale. Borough of Wednesbury. Thomas Bayley Potter, of Buile Hill, Pendleton, Alexander Brogden, Esq. Lancashire. City of Winchester. County of Westmorland. ^ William Barrow Simonds, Esq. The Right Honourable Thomas Taylour (com- John Bonham Carter, Esq. monly called Earl of Bective), of Virginia Lodge, Cavan, Ireland. Borough of Lymington. William Lowther, of Lowther Castle, in the.said county, Esq. - George Charles Gordon Lennox (commonly called Lord George Charles Gordon Lennox). Borough of JVestbury. Borough of Tynemouth. John Lewis Phipps, of Westbury, Esq. Thomas Eustace Smith, Esq. Borough of Chatham. Arthur John Otway, of Harley-street, London, Borough of Ludlow.
  • 67 Summer 2010

    67 Summer 2010

    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 67 / Summer 2010 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals and the left Matthew Roberts Out of Chartism, into Liberalism Popular radicals and the Liberal Party Michael Freeden The Liberal Party and the New Liberalism John Shepherd The flight from the Liberal PartyLiberals who joined Labour, 1914–31 Matt Cole ‘An out-of-date word’ Jo Grimond and the left Peter Hellyer The Young Liberals and the left, 1965–70 Liberal Democrat History Group Liberal Leaders The latest publication from the Liberal Democrat History Group is Liberal Leaders: Leaders of the Liberal Party, SDP and Liberal Democrats since 1900. The sixty-page booklet contains concise biographies of every Liberal, Social Democrat and Liberal Democrat leader since 1900. The total of sixteen biographies stretches from Henry Campbell-Bannerman to Nick Clegg, including such figures as H. H. Asquith, David Lloyd George, Jo Grimond, David Steel, David Owen and Paddy Ashdown. Liberal Leaders is available to Journal of Liberal History subscribers for the special price of £5 (normal price £6) with free p&p. To order, please send a cheque for £5.00 (made out to ‘Liberal Democrat History Group’) to LDHG, 38 Salford Road, London SW2 4BQ. RESEARCH IN PROGRESS If you can help any of the individuals listed below with sources, contacts, or any other information — or if you know anyone who can — please pass on details to them. Details of other research projects in progress should be sent to the Editor (see page 3) for inclusion here.