Appendix 9 - 1:100,000 Scale Example (Sheet 5648, Charlotte) Generalised Vector Vegetation Map
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
MVG 16 Acacia Shrublands DRAFT
MVG 16 - ACACIA SHRUBLANDS Acacia hillii, Tanami Desert, NT (Photo: D. Keith) Overview The overstorey of MVG 16 is dominated by multi-stemmed acacia shrubs. The most widespread species is Acacia aneura (mulga). Mulga vegetation takes on a variety of structural expressions and is consequently classified partly within MVG 16 where the overstorey is dominated by multi-stemmed shrubs, partly within MVG 6 in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol definition of forest cover in Australia (trees > 2 m tall and crown cover > 20%, foliage projective cover > 10%); and partly within MVG 13 where the woody dominants are predominantly single-stemmed, but with crown cover less than 20%. Occurs where annual rainfall is below 250mm in southern Australia and below 350mm in northern Australia (Hodgkinson 2002; Foulkes et al. 2014). Species composition varies along rainfall gradients, with substrate and rainfall seasonality (Beadle 1981; Johnson and Burrows 1994). Transitions into MVG 13 Acacia woodlands with higher rainfall and varying soil types. Is most commonly found on red earth soils (Hodgkinson 2002). Facts and figures Major Vegetation Group MVG 16 - Acacia Shrublands Major Vegetation Subgroups 20. Stony mulga woodlands and shrublands NSW, (number of NVIS descriptions) NT, QLD, SA, WA 23. Sandplain Acacia woodlands and shrublands NSW, NT, QLD, SA, WA Typical NVIS structural formations Shrubland (tall, mid,) Open shrubland (tall, mid,) Sparse shrubland (tall, mid,) Number of IBRA regions 53 Most extensive in IBRA region Est. pre-1750 and present : Great Victoria Desert (WA and SA) Estimated pre-1750 extent (km2) 865 845 Present extent (km2) 851 274 Area protected (km2) 85 444 Acacia ligulata (sandhill wattle), SA (Photo: M. -
Arsbc-2012-Paper 6-3 Janet Walton.Pdf
Ecosystem Management Understanding (EMU) ™: building landscape literacy to rehydrate the rangelands of South Australia Participants and staff of the EMU™ Projects in South Australia (Janet Walton¹, Hugh Pringle² and Col Stanton³ ) 1: Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South Australia. Email [email protected] 2.Director of EMU™. Email [email protected] 3.Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport. Email [email protected] Key Words: Trust, Empathy, Attitude Abstract: Bringing about positive change and the wise use of rangelands is more about enabling landholders to enhance their knowledge and build their skills rather than bringing modern science to “teach”. Pastoralists across the South Australian Arid Lands (SAAL) Natural Resources Management (NRM) Region, have embraced the Ecosystem Management Understanding (EMU)™ approach because it values and blends their local knowledge with scientific expertise in a conducive environment. Through participating in the EMU™ Projects, land managers have shifted their focus from trying to resurrect dysfunctional landscapes typified by exacerbated landscape droughting to key problems jeopardising their most productive and healthy country. This is a very different approach to that conventionally used in the Decade of Landcare and promoted by administration bodies at the time. Here we present a succinct and general review of EMU™ in South Australia from 2009 to today. What is EMU™? The Ecosystem Management Understanding (EMU™) is a voluntary, confidentiual, unique and holistic land management approach for land managers. It builds on the solid foundation of local knowledge of country and combines this vital link with scientific expertise to build landscape literacy through nurturing landholder skills to read landscape processes, condition and trend. -
Flora and Vegetation Borefield April 2012
Metals X Limited Wingellina Nickel Project Level 1 Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Wingellina Borefield April 2012 Outback Ecology Services 1/71 Troy Terrace Jolimont WA 6014 Ph: +61 (08) 9388 8799 Fax: +61 (08) 9388 8633 [email protected] Level 1 Flora and Vegetation Assessment of the Wingellina Borefield Distribution: Company Copies Contact Name Metals X Limited 1 Electronic Richard Coles; Max Maczurad Document Control for Job Number: WING-VS-11003 Document Status Authors Reviewer Signature Date of Issue Draft Report Dr Rick Davies Jeni Alford JA 13/04/12 Final Report Dr. Rick Davies / Jeni Alford Mark Goldstone MG 5-5-12 F:\Wingellina\VS\WING-VS-11003\3. Reporting\WING-VS-11003_Final - 27-04-12MG.docx DISCLAIMER, CONFIDENTIALITY AND COPYRIGHT STATEMENT © Outback Ecology. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any material form or communicated by any means without the permission of the copyright owner. This document is confidential. Neither the whole nor any part of this document may be disclosed to any third party without the prior written approval of Outback Ecology and Metals X Ltd. Outback Ecology undertook the work, and prepared this document, in accordance with specific instructions from Metals X Ltd to whom this document is addressed, within the time and budgetary requirements of Metals X Ltd. The conclusions and recommendations stated in this document are based on those instructions and requirements, and they could change if such instructions and requirements change or are in fact inaccurate or incomplete. Outback Ecology has prepared this document using data and information supplied to Outback Ecology by Metals X Ltd and other individuals and organisations, most of whom are referred to in this document. -
Rangelands, Western Australia
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Glossary of Terms
Appendix A Glossary of Terms Nolans Bore Mine Notice of Intent 126 Glossary of Terms Term Description 232Th An isotope of the element Thorium 238U An isotope of the element Uranium AAPA Aboriginal Areas Protection Authority ADG Australian Code for the Transport of Dangerous Goods by Road and Rail, 6th edition, 1998. ANSTO Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation ARI The Average Recurrence Interval is the average, or expected, value of the periods between exceedances of a given rainfall total accumulated over a given duration ARPANSA Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency AS Australian Standards BCM Bank Cubic Metre is a measure of the in-situ volume of a material Bench A landform consisting of a long strip of land at constant height in an otherwise sloped area. Benign waste Process or mining waste that is benign to the environment BoM Bureau of Meteorology Bulk density The weight of material (including solid particles and any contained water) per unit volume including water. Ca Calcium Calcium chloride An ionic compound of calcium and chlorine. (CaCl2) CAPEX Capital Expenditure CBR California Bearing Ratio Cheralite (CaTh[PO4]2). The dominant member of the Monazite group. Cl Chlorine CLC Central Land Council Cut-off A specified value below which ore becomes uneconomic for the operator to extract DBIRD Northern Territory Department of Business, Industry and Resource Development DCF Discounted Cash Flow DEH Division of Environment, Heritage and the Arts DN 100 Pipes with a Nominal Diameter of 100 millimetres Nolans Bore Mine Notice of Intent 127 Drill & blast A method in which holes are drilled for explosive charges. -
Native Vegetation Council Rangelands Assessment Manual
Native Vegetation Council Rangelands Assessment Manual Native Vegetation Branch July 2017 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution v4.0 (International Licence) www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © Crown in right of the State of South Australia 2017 2 | NVC Rangelands Assessment Manual Contents CONTENTS 3 1 QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE 5 2 INTRODUCTION 6 2.1 How the method works 6 2.2 Background of the Rangelands Assessment 6 3 PRELIMINARY OFFICE PROCEDURE 7 4 FIELD PROCEDURE 12 4.1 Equipment 12 4.2 Determining locations of Sample Points in an application area (Block) 12 4.3 Completing the Rangelands Field Assessment 13 4.3.1 Background to the field assessment 13 4.3.2 Undertake the field assessment 13 4.3.3 Sample Point assessment details explained 17 5 FILLING IN THE RANGELANDS ASSESSMENT SCORESHEET 24 5.1 Landscape Context Scores 24 5.1.1 Number of landform features in Block 24 5.1.2 Size of the Block 25 5.1.3 Percentage (%) area protected in IBRA sub-region score 25 5.1.4 Presence of a wetland, watercourse or lake score 25 5.2 Vegetation Condition Scores 25 5.2.1 Utilisation scores 26 5.2.2 Biotic and physical disturbance scores 27 5.2.3 Vegetation stratum score 27 5.2.4 Introduced plant species cover score 27 5.3 Conservation Significance Scores 27 5.3.1 Conservation significance of ecological community score 28 5.3.2 Plant species of conservation significance 28 5.3.3 Fauna species of conservation significance 28 5.4 Site Scores 29 NVC Rangelands Assessment Manual | 3 5.4.1 Unit Biodiversity Score 29 5.4.2 Total Biodiversity Score 29 6 SUBMISSION OF DATASHEETS AND SCORESHEETS 30 6.1 Rangelands Assessment Site information and scores 30 6.2 Clearance application or regulation reports 30 7 INTERPRETATION & REVIEW OF THE RANGELAND ASSESSMENT METHOD 31 7.1 Revisits to Rangelands Assessment Sites 31 7.2 Review of the Rangeland Assessment Method 31 8 REFERENCES 32 9 APPENDICES 33 Appendix A. -
Desert Channels, Queensland
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
MVG 13 Acacia Open Woodlands
MVG 13 - ACACIA OPEN WOODLANDS Gidgee woodlands (Acacia cambagei) near Coopers Creek, Innamincka, SA (Photo: M. Fagg) Overview Many Acacia woodlands are dominated by a single Acacia species, which may co-occur with other members of the genus, either in the understorey or in transitional segments of environmental gradients. Species composition and the identity of the dominant species vary along rainfall gradients, with substrate and to a lesser extent rainfall seasonality (Beadle 1981; Johnson and Burrows 1994). MVG 13 comprises several subgroups including: “gidgee” and “myall” woodlands that occur as mean annual rainfall declines below 550 mm and “mulga” which dominate woodlands on stony or sandy landscapes across the arid zone and across the northeast semi-arid landscapes adjoining savanna. Mulga vegetation takes on a variety of structural expressions and is consequently classified partly within MVG 6, in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol definition of forest cover in Australia (trees > 2 m tall and crown cover > 20%, foliage projective cover > 10%); and partly within MVG 13 where the tree canopy layer is sparser or MVG 16 where the woody dominants are not predominantly single-stemmed Facts and figures Major Vegetation Group MVG 13 - Acacia Open Woodlands Major Vegetation Subgroups xx. Gidgee woodlands NSW, QLD, SA, NT (number of NVIS descriptions) 22. Semi-arid myall woodlands NSW, QLD 24. Arid myall woodlands NSW, SA, WA 20. Stony mulga woodlands and shrublands NSW, QLD, NT, SA, WA 23. Sandplain Acacia woodlands and shrublands NSW, QLD, NT, SA, WA Typical NVIS structural formations Woodland (low) Open woodland (mid, low) Number of IBRA regions 36 Most extensive in IBRA region Est. -
Exploring the Biochemical and Phylogenetic Fingerprint of Australian Native Plants for Sustainable Use of Saline Lands
Exploring the biochemical and phylogenetic fingerprint of Australian native plants for sustainable use of saline lands Shanthi Safrina Maria Monica Joseph (MSc Biotechnology) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2014 Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia Abstract The remarkably rich Australian native vegetation has developed some unique morphological and genetic mechanisms to adapt to severe drought, salinity and water logging. However, the utilisation and significance of Australian native plant bio- resources has been under-exploited, with relatively few dedicated studies, particularly in comparison to crop plants such as rice, wheat or barley. This project investigated the unique gene pool of certain Australian salinity-tolerant plants (three saltbushes- Atriplex nummularia, A. semibaccata, A. amnicola and four Acacia species- Acacia victoriae, A. salicina, A. pendula and A. stenophylla). The osmoprotectants glycine betaine (GB), proline and trehalose known to impart salt tolerance were investigated in these plants. Genes encoding the enzymes choline monooxygenase (CMO) and betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) involved in GB biosynthesis were identified in the three saltbushes. In-silico analyses of their cDNA sequences and predicted proteins revealed valuable predictive data pertaining to their extremely conserved functional and structural motifs, subcellular localisation and physico-chemical properties. Gene expression analyses indicated that the saltbush genes for CMO and BADH were differentially expressed in leaves and roots, with significant up-regulation (>1.5 fold change) of CMO and/or BADH mRNA in the leaf tissues indicating that these genes serve as ideal candidates in transgenic work to enhance salt tolerance in salt sensitive plants. -
No. 115 JUNE 2003 Price: $5.00 Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 115 (June 2003)
No. 115 JUNE 2003 Price: $5.00 Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 115 (June 2003) AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Office Bearers President Vice President Stephen Hopper John Clarkson Kings Park & Botanic Garden Centre for Tropical Agriculture West Perth WA 6005 PO Box 1054 tel: (08) 9480 3605 Mareeba QLD 4880 email: [email protected] tel: (07) 4048 4745 email: [email protected] Secretary Treasurer Brendan Lepschi Anthony Whalen Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Australian National Herbarium Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600, Canberra GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 ACT 2601 tel: (02) 6246 5167 tel: (02) 6246 5175 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Councillor Councillor R.O.(Bob) Makinson Andrew Rozefelds Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney Tasmanian Herbarium Mrs Macquaries Road GPO Box 252-40 Sydney NSW 2000 Hobart, Tasmania 7001 tel: (02) 9231 8111 tel.: (03) 6226 2635 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Public Officer Annette Wilson Australian Biological Resources Study Environment Australia GPO Box 787 CANBERRA ACT 2601 tel: (02) 6250 9417 email: [email protected] Affiliate Society Papua New Guinea Botanical Society ASBS Web site www.anbg.gov.au/asbs Webmaster: Murray Fagg Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research Australian National Herbarium Email: [email protected] (No loose-leaf inclusions with this issue) Publication dates of previous issue Austral.Syst.Bot.Soc.Nsltr 114 (March 2003 issue) Hardcopy: 5th May 2003; ASBS Web site: 2nd May 2003 Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 115 (June 2003) From the President In April, together with a few other members of Californian botanists have passed away since then ASBS, I was lucky enough to attend the joint – Ledyard Stebbins, Lincoln Constance, Robert Third International Monocots Conference and Ornduff, Herbert Baker. -
Biological Survey of Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands
Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands Biological Survey RESULTS VEGETATION By P. J. Lang1, P. D. Canty1, B. J. Nesbitt2, L. M. Baker2 and A. C. Robinson1 INTRODUCTION Vegetation overview This chapter gives an introductory overview of The biogeography of the AP Lands is complex. The vegetation in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands (AP range of landforms, soils and rock types, and Lands) and a brief review of previous botanical microclimates combine to provide the most diverse endeavour. This is followed by sections detailing expression of arid landscapes in South Australia. The various aspects of the flora, including new records and area, by virtue of its remoteness and lack of obvious accounts of species of particular significance. The next resources, has also remained relatively pristine, further section presents data collected by Baker and Nesbitt enhancing the biological importance of this region. integrating much of the Anangu traditional ecological The AP Lands include the tallest mountains in the knowledge provided during the survey. An analysis of State. The largest range complex, the Musgrave the quadrat-based vegetation data follows and the Ranges, has the highest mean annual rainfall (200 mm) resultant vegetation groups are described. in the Northern Arid Province (Laut et al. 1977). Altitude, aspect and drainage patterns associated with Only ‘public’ information was recorded from Anangu. these and other range systems in the region have a Prior to any survey information being collected, significant influence on vegetation, harbouring unique discussions were held with the Anangu survey plant communities, relict species and endemics. participants, to clarify what type of information was Depositional landforms surround the ranges and being sought and how it would be made available to the include extant and palaeo drainage systems. -
Baseline Vegetation and Flora Assessment
Wingellina Nickel Project Baseline Vegetation and Flora Assessment April 2009 Outback Ecology Services 1/71 Troy Terrace Jolimont WA 6014 Ph: +61 (08) 9388 8799 Fax: +61 (08) 9388 8633 [email protected] Wingellina Nickel Project Baseline Vegetation and Flora Assessment Distribution: Company Copies Contact Name Metals X Limited 2 copies (plus CD copy) Paul Cmrlec Document Control for Job Number: WMN-VS-0907 Report Author Reviewer Signature Date of Issue Status Draft Interim Brett Neasham, Belinda Newman David Jasper DJ 4 July 2008 Report Martin Henson David Jasper Draft report DJ 15 April, 2009 DISCLAIMER, CONFIDENTIALITY AND COPYRIGHT STATEMENT © Outback Ecology. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any material form or communicated by any means without the permission of the copyright owner. This document is confidential. Neither the whole nor any part of this document may be disclosed to any third party without the prior written approval of Outback Ecology and Metals X Limited. Outback Ecology undertook the work, and prepared this document, in accordance with specific instructions from Metals X Limited to whom this document is addressed, within the time and budgetary requirements of Metals X Limited. The conclusions and recommendations stated in this document are based on those instructions and requirements, and they could change if such instructions and requirements change or are in fact inaccurate or incomplete. Outback Ecology has prepared this document using data and information supplied to Outback Ecology by Metals X Limited and other individuals and organizations, most of whom are referred to in this document. Where possible, throughout the document the source of data used has been identified.