Fishing Was the New World's Earliest Industry, and What Is Present-Day

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fishing Was the New World's Earliest Industry, and What Is Present-Day CHAPTER I Historical Overview of the Northern New Fngland Fxshzng Industry Fishing was the NewWorld's earliest industry, and what is present-day northern NewEngland was an early leader in that industry, To be sure, fishing the Grand Banks near Newfoundlandhad become a well-established industry as early as the 15th century and possibly earlier. However, the New England fisheries quickly expandedin prominence, until by the latter part of the 17th century, fishing dwarfed all other industries in importance. In the early 17th century, only inshore stocks of fish were exploited by Maine and NewHampshire settlers, who used relatively smalI 'shallops," usually with a four mancrew. The primary commercial species was cod, which was salted and ex- ported to France, Spain, the Caribbean and elsewhere as early as 1650 McFarland 1911;69!. In the latter part of the 17th century, NewEnglanders began building much larger vessels which stayed out for much longer periods and began to exploit the Grand Bankswaters off Newfoundlandand Lab- rador. During the 18th century, iMassachusettstook a commandinglead in NewEngland's fishing industry; its population was by then denser and its boats larger and more numerous than that of Maine and New Hampshire. For example, in 1765-1775 of 665 New England codfishing vesseIs, only 60 were from Maine McFarland 1911:112!. The periOd betWeen the American ReVOlutiOn and the War Of 1812 waS a bad One fOr New England' S fishing industry. A great deal of capital equipment had deteriorated or been destroyed, and mar- keting suffered because of a British law prohibiting importation of U. S. fish. To try to alle- viate the poor conditions of the industry the U. S. Congress in 1792 passed a bounty law whereby shipowners received graduated payments, depending on the tonnage of the vessel. The Maine fishing industry grew relatively rapidly in response to this bounty system, and manyformer fishing ham- lets became full-fledged towns McFarland 1911:136; 143-146!. During the 19th century, the period between the close of the War of 1812 and the Civil War were perhaps the most prosperous years for New England's fisheries Acheson et al. 1978:20!. There was a big expansion in fleet size, catch size, and numbers of different species exploited. The Federal "bounty" continued and was raised in 1818, remaining in effect until 1866 McFarland 1911: 162-164!. Fish harvesting and processing technologies grew rapidly, And the market value of fish was very good. Cod continued to be the mainstay of the New England fishery, but after 1818 the mackeral, herring, and menhaden fisheries expanded rapidly. Fish were caught from sail-powered boats by men using handlines from the boat itself, or in traditional fixed gear operations, in the case of herring first brush weirs, and later stop seines!. Considering the technology used, catches were extremely high McFarland 1911:171!. Maine and New Hampshire lagged behind Massachusetts in the use of large boats capable of exploit- ing the Grand Banks and other distant areas. Only during the 1830's did much larger 0 to 20 ton! vessels begin to be constructed in iMaine, while 40 to 80 ton square stern schooners became the standard long-distance boats in the 1850's Acheson et al. 1978;22!. Perhaps the most important changes in the decades preceeding the Civil War were those which led to the eventual diversifica- tion and expansion of New England's fishing industry ibid!. Major technical changes in harvesting included: the use of line trawls generally baited with clams or small herring!, which began around 1850 Green 1906:367!; the catching of cod from dories rather than from the main vesseI a technique so efficient it was used by the Portuguese until the 1960's!; and the use of purse seines used first for mackeral and menhaden in the mid 1860's, and much later for herring! Acheson et al. 1978:24! . Processing also underwent important changes. While salting continued on a large scale, fishing products began to be marketed in a variety of ways. Smoking and pickling of herring had begun in the eastern part of Maine especially Eastport and Lubec! as early as the 1820's and 1830's. The canning of lobster began in Eastport in 1843 McFarland 1911:178!. According to Goode 887, Vol. III:17!, "the first can of hermetically sealed goods" put up in the United States was pro- duced in Eastport, the process having been introduced from France via Halifax, Nova Scotia. A technique for extracting oil from menhadenwas developedin 1850, andby the time of the Civil War the first steam menhaden oil factory in Maine was built Green 1906:371!, The Civil War and years immediately following marked a peak in the NewEngland fishing industry. The war brought favorable prices, and catcheswere up. However,from the decadesafter the Civil War until World War I, fisheries underwent a decline, even though important innovations continued to be made. Part of the reason for this decline was a decrease in landings of several major stocks, especially menhaden,mackeral, and cod. Menhaden,especially, underwentmassive fluctua- tions in local availability. After being found in abundancein NewEngland waters in 1864, 1865, and 1866, they all but vanishedby the early 1870's. The groundfishery especially cod, haddock, hake, and pollack! continued to have fairly high catch levels, but hy 1885a real decline set in AcheSonet al. 1978:26!. Mackeral showedan even more precipitous drop. From 1S85to 1886, the catchdropped 75', andcontinued to decline thoughat a slowerrate! in subsequentyears McFar- land 1911:264!. The lobster industry becamewell-established during this period, stimulated at first by the rapidly expandingcanning business. The canneries took any size lobsters, and there beganto be "a no- ticeable scarcity of lobsters" McFarland 1911:232!. To try to rectify this situation, Maine passeda law in 1879which prohibited lobster canningfrom August1st to May1st, following; in 1S83it was madeillegal to can lobsters under nine inches long; and in 1885, 1889, 1891, and 1895 there were further Iaws regulating lobster canning seasons and minimumsizes. These various re- gulations led to a decline in the lobster canning industry by the 1880's and in IS95 the last re- maining factory closed ibid!. The fresh lobster market, on the other hand, continued strong. "Lobster smacks" were used as early as the 1840's but after the Civil War there was a great in- crease in numbers. These vessels had regular routes betweenpoints along the Maine and NewHamp- shire coast and the Boston, NewYork, and Philadelphia markets Achesonet al. 1978:28!. The canningof herring as "sardines"! becamean important industry in Mainein the 1SSO's,es- pecially in WashingtonCounty. Theherring catch, then as now, showedconsiderable fluctuations, thoughthe marketwas strong and innovations in canningand processing continuedto be made. Clam had been used extensively for bait, and canning opened up a new market. The harvest of soft-shelled clams from NewEngland continued to rise in both volume and value during the late 1800's, However, by 1905 the volume was way down, though prices remained strong McFarland 1911:246!. Innovations continued in the harvesting and transporting of fish. The use of dories and line trawls had become universal by the 1870's. Crushed ice was used on board vessels to preserve fish. Steamersbegan to be used for morerapid fish transport, apparently used first in the men- haden industry in the 1860's. By 1900, somelarger fishing vessels began to carry auxilliary gas engines, thoughsail continued to be important up through World WarI and even later. Perhaps the most important innovation in harvesting wasthe otter trawl. Howeve~,though this was intro- ducedas early as 1905, it did not really becomewidely distributed until 1920 Ackerman1941:79! From the time of World War I until the present, the pace of change in the NewEngland fisheries has accelerated. The decline in stocks of certain popular species has also accelerated. This decline has been counterbalanced to some degree by innovations which allowed the profitable ex- ploitation and marketingof other species. Otter trawls, introduced in NewEngland in 1905, be- camewidely usedby 1920, and madepossible an increased catch of various flatfish species, had- dock, and redfish. By 1935, 80%of all NewEngland groundfish were caughtby otter trawls Ack- erman1941:78-79!. The invention of the filleting machineand refinement in quick-freezing tech- niques in the early 1930's were further developmentswhich increasedthe attractiveness of ex- ploiting species such as redfi sh, flatfish, and haddock. Theuse of gas and diesel engines in boats increasedgreatly in the Ieriod betweenthe World Wars, alongwith the useof steel boat construction. However,the fin-fishing fleet of NewEngland as a whole,and especially of the northernregions, wasvery heterogeneousat this time; dories and hand lines continued to be usedalongside new$300,000 steel-hulled trawlers Ackerman1941:71, Achesonet al. 1978:34!. In the 1920's and 1930's, somelobstering was still donefrom rowing skiffs, but virtually all larger lobster boats werepowered by convertedauto engines; manywere equippedwith trap-pulling winches,often madefrom the rear endof an automobile Acheson et al. 1978: 34! . The 1940's and 1950's was a period of improved catches in many of New England's fisheries. There were also continuing changes in boats and gear. Although the catch of somegroundfish species continued to decline, catches of mackeral, redfish, whiting silver hake! and flatfish all in- creased. Shrimp, which appear in northern NewEngland waters from time to time perhaps on a cyclical basis! were caught in large numbersin the mid 1940's. They were again caught in large quantities in the late 1960's and early 1970's, only to decline again in the late 1970's. I.ob- ster catches, which had declined drastically during the 1930's, improved markedly; for example, in 1942the reported catch in Mainewas only 8.5 million pounds,but in 1950it wasup to 19 million Hebert 1951!.
Recommended publications
  • Technical Appendix
    Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series ONMS-16-05 Technical Appendix: Socioeconomic Profiles, Economic Impact/Contribution, and Importance- Satisfaction Ratings of Recreating Visitors to the Outer Coast of Washington and the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary: Volume 4, 2014 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Office of National Marine Sanctuaries April 2016 About the Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series The Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, serves as the trustee for a system of 14 marine protected areas encompassing more than 170,000 square miles of ocean and Great Lakes waters. The 13 national marine sanctuaries and one marine national monument within the National Marine Sanctuary System represent areas of America’s ocean and Great Lakes environment that are of special national significance. Within their waters, giant humpback whales breed and calve their young, coral colonies flourish, and shipwrecks tell stories of our maritime history. Habitats include beautiful coral reefs, lush kelp forests, whale migrations corridors, spectacular deep-sea canyons, and underwater archaeological sites. These special places also provide homes to thousands of unique or endangered species and are important to America’s cultural heritage. Sites range in size from one square mile to almost 140,000 square miles and serve as natural classrooms, cherished recreational spots, and are home to valuable commercial industries. Because of considerable differences in settings, resources, and threats, each marine sanctuary has a tailored management plan. Conservation, education, research, monitoring and enforcement programs vary accordingly. The integration of these programs is fundamental to marine protected area management.
    [Show full text]
  • And Others Small Scale Marine Fisheries
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 243 658 SE 044 389 AUTHOR Martinson, Steven; And OtherS TITLE Small Scale Marine Fisheries: An ExtensionTraining Manual. TR-30. INSTITUTION Peace Corps, Washington, DC., Office of Program Development. SPONS AGENCY 'Peace Corps, Washington, DC. InformationCollection and Exchange Div. PUB DATE Apr 83 NOTE 578p.; Prepared by Technos Corp., San Juan, Puerto RiCO. PUB TYPE Guides = Classroom Use - Guides (ForTeachers) (052) EDRS PRICE MF03/PC24 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Developing Nations; *Fisheries; *Learning Activities; Marine Biology; Postsecondary Education; Science Education; *Skill Development; Technology; *Training Methods; *Training Objectiyes IDENTIFIERS *Peace Corps ABSTRACT This manual is designed for use in_a preservice training program 'for prospective volunteers whose PeaceCorps service Will be spent working with small-scale artisanalfighing communities in developing nations. The program consists of8'weeks of intensive training_to develop competencies in marinefisheries technology and fisheries extension work and in the ability to transferknowledge and skills. The manual includes an overview of the program,lists of program goals, information onstarting the program, lists of references and materialt needed,_tips on conductingthe program, and the complete 111 training sessions.Provided for each session-are: (1) session goals; (2) one or more exercisesdirected toward meeting these goals; (3) total time required to complete thesession or exercise; (4) overview statement describing the purposeof the session or exercise; (5) procedures andactivities (sequenced in time steps that describe what trainer andparticipants are required to do at a particular point in theprogram); (6) list of materials and equipment needed; and, when applicable, (7) trainer notes.Although each session builds toward or from the -ones) preceding and following it, individual sessions can be usedindependently with minor modification.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-2018 Fishing in Washington Sport Fishing Rules Pamphlet
    Sport Fishing Rules Pamphlet Corrections and Updates July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 Last updated June 28, 2017. Marine Area Rules Page 98, LANDING A FISH - A club or dipnet (landing net) may be used to assist landing a legal fish taken by legal gear. A gaff may only be used to land a legally hooked LINGCOD (in Marine Areas 1-3 and 4 West of Bonilla-Tatoosh line), HALIBUT, TUNA, or DOGFISH SHARK that will be retained. HALIBUT may be shot or harpooned while landing. Photo By Scott Mayfield General Information Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW) Dr. Jim Unsworth, Director Ron Warren, Assistant Director, Fish Program Contents General Information General Washington Fish & Wildlife Commission GENERAL RULES & INFORMATION Dr. Bradley Smith, Chair, Bellingham Jay Kehne, Omak Contact Information ..................................2 Larry Carpenter, Vice Chair, Mount Vernon Miranda Wecker, Naselle Update From WDFW ................................3 Barbara Baker, Olympia Kim Thorburn, Spokane Statewide General Rules .........................4 Jay Holzmiller, Anatone David Graybill, Leavenworth Salmon and Trout Handling Rules ............5 Rules Robert “Bob” Kehoe, Seattle License Information ...............................6-7 Catch Record Cards .................................8 Freshwater Catch Record Card Codes .......................9 How to Use This Pamphlet Definitions ..........................................10-11 FRESHWATER GENERAL RULES This pamphlet is effective July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 Statewide Freshwater Rules..............13-15 and contains information you need to legally fish throughout RIVERS .............................................17-73 Washington State (see WAC summary information below). Special Rules Introduction ..................17 Puget Sound Puget Puget Sound and Coast Rivers - Rivers & Coast 1 Read the General Information Pages. Special Rules ...................................18-46 Read the Licensing and Catch Record Card information.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-Review-Fish-Habita
    United Nations UNEP/GEF South China Sea Global Environment Environment Programme Project Facility UNEP/GEF/SCS/RWG-F.8/5 Date: 12th October 2006 Original: English Eighth Meeting of the Regional Working Group for the Fisheries Component of the UNEP/GEF Project: “Reversing Environmental Degradation Trends in the South China Sea and Gulf of Thailand” Bangka Belitung Province, Indonesia 1st - 4th November 2006 INFORMATION COLLATED BY THE FISHERIES AND HABITAT COMPONENTS OF THE SOUTH CHINA SEA PROJECT ON SITES IMPORTANT TO THE LIFE- CYCLES OF SIGNIFICANT FISH SPECIES UNEP/GEF/SCS/RWG-F.8/5 Page 1 IDENTIFICATION OF FISHERIES REFUGIA IN THE GULF OF THAILAND It was discussed at the Sixth Meeting of the Regional Scientific and Technical Committee (RSTC) in December 2006 that the Regional Working Group on Fisheries should take the following two-track approach to the identification of fisheries refugia: 1. Review known spawning areas for pelagic and invertebrate species, with the aim of evaluating these sites as candidate spawning refugia. 2. Evaluate each of the project’s habitat demonstration sites as potential juvenile/pre-recruit refugia for significant demersal species. Rationale for the Two-Track Approach to the Identification of Fisheries Refugia The two main life history events for fished species are reproduction and recruitment. It was noted by the RSTC that both of these events involve movement between areas, and some species, often pelagic fishes, migrate to particular spawning areas. It was also noted that many species also utilise specific coastal habitats such as coral reefs, seagrass, and mangroves as nursery areas. In terms of the effects of fishing, most populations of fished species are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of high levels of fishing effort in areas and at times where there are high abundances of (a) stock in spawning condition, (b) juveniles and pre-recruits, or (c) pre-recruits migrating to fishing grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodlot Recreation
    Woodlot Management Home Study Course Module 9 Woodlot Recreation Preface Many woodlot owners enjoy outdoor recreation activities like hiking or snowmobiling on their property but are not purposefully managing for those activities. Others may tend to separate recreation and timber management even though they do recreational activities in 'areas managed for their timber values. Outdoor recreation can be improved by planning for it and can also be managed for along with the other uses of your land. This module will help you develop an outdoor recreation plan in keeping with your interests and woodlot potential. It contains basic, practical information if you use your woodlot for family recreation or if you allow occasional public use. If you expect a lot of use by groups or plan on starting an outdoor recreation business on your woodlot, you should refer to a companion study called the Woodlot Recreation Manual (1995). This manual by Glyn Bissex, a professor at Acadia University in the School of Recreation and Physical Education, provides more in-depth information on planning and marketing. This module is the ninth in a series of Woodlot Management Home Study Courses. Other modules in the series are # I Introduction to Silviculture, #2 Harvesting Systems, #3 Stand Spacing, #4 Wildlife and Forestry, #5 Stand Establishment, #6. Chain Saw Use and Safety, #7 Woodlot Ecology and #8 Wood Utilization and Technology. They are available free from the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Extension Services Division in Halifax, 424-5444; or Education and Publication Services in Truro, 893-5642. The Woodlot Recreation Manual by Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • What Fishers Need to Know
    What Fishers Need to Know GENERAL • Must have active fisher sticker on card. • Tax period is April through March. o Taxes are due July 1. • All commercial harvest must be put on a Fish Receiving Ticket or reported to the Natural Resources office to fill out a ticket within 24 hours, unless otherwise specified. • Must have ID on person in order to harvest. • Fish ticket must be filled out accurately. o Your signature on the ticket verifies that it is correct. • Minors may harvest no earlier than one (1) hour after the school day ends and not later than 10 p.m.on a day immediately preceding a school day. BOATS • Must register all boats with a motor that will be used in a fishery. • To register a boat, you must be in possession of a title of bill of sale. • Registration must be kept on board boat at all times. o Must have boat # on each side. o Current year sticker required. Expiration is June 30. • Coast Guard requirements must be followed. • All deck hands must have ID on their person with an active sticker on card. • No non-tribal assistance/transport of a commercial harvest. SUBSISTENCE INFORMATION • Separate cards are handed out for shellfish and finfish subsistence • All species are recorded on the cards—not just clams/oysters or salmon. • Subsistence cards are issued on a quarterly basis. Quarterly periods include: o January 1 – March 31 o April 1 – June 30 o July 1 – September 30 o October 1 – December 31 • Cards issues within a quarterly period expire on the last day of the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming Bivalve Molluscs: Methods for Study and Development by D
    Advances in World Aquaculture, Volume 1 Managing Editor, Paul A. Sandifer Farming Bivalve Molluscs: Methods for Study and Development by D. B. Quayle Department of Fisheries and Oceans Fisheries Research Branch Pacific Biological Station Nanaimo, British Columbia V9R 5K6 Canada and G. F. Newkirk Department of Biology Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 471 Canada Published by THE WORLD AQUACULTURE SOCIETY in association with THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE The World Aquaculture Society 16 East Fraternity Lane Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 Copyright 1989 by INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher, The World Aquaculture Society, 16 E. Fraternity Lane, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 and the International Development Research Centre, 250 Albert St., P.O. Box 8500, Ottawa, Canada K1G 3H9. ; t" ary of Congress Catalog Number: 89-40570 tI"624529-0-4 t t lq 7 i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The following figures are reproduced with permission: Figures 1- 10, 12, 13, 17,20,22,23, 32, 35, 37, 42, 45, 48, 50 - 54, 62, 64, 72, 75, 86, and 87 from the Fisheries Board of Canada; Figures 11 and 21 from the United States Government Printing Office; Figure 15 from the Buckland Founda- tion; Figures 18, 19,24 - 28, 33, 34, 38, 41, 56, and 65 from the International Development Research Centre; Figures 29 and 30 from the Journal of Shellfish Research; and Figure 43 from Fritz (1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns in Abundance and Size Distribution of the Pismo Clam
    SYMPOSIUM Student Journal of Science & Math Volume 2 Issue 1 biology 117 B 82.731 SIZE AND ABUNDANCE OF PISMO CLAMS IN THE INTERTIDAL AND SUBTIDAL A RESEARCH ARTICLE by Jenny Greene Introduction The Pismo clam,Tivela stultorum, was once the foundation of a thriving commercial and recreational fishery in California (Bureau of Marine Fisheries, 1949). While there has been concern and interest in monitoring and management of the Pismo clam population, little is known about the biology and distribution of the clams themselves. For example, the characterization of the abundance and distribution of clams across a depth gradient is unknown. Furthermore, the anthropogenic impact on the distribution of Pismo clams at a particular site through recreational fishing has also never been described. The distribution of Pismo clams has been historically limited to sandy beaches from Monterey, California down to Baja, Mexico (Shaw & Hassler, 1989). These clams exist primarily in the intertidal and shallow subtidal but have been observed in depths up to 80 feet (Weymouth, 1923). Pismo clams exhibit continuous growth, with age estimated by growth rings on the shell (Coe & Fitch, 1950). These clams can grow approximately 20mm in length per year for their first four years, with growth slowing after this period (Shaw & Hassler, 1989). Pismo clams can grow to about 114mm (the minimum legal size limit for recreational fishing south of Monterey County) in 5 to 8 years (Shaw & Hassler, 1989). Pismo clams possess sturdy, thick valves and a strong foot, which are favorable adaptations to this high- energy environment (Coe, 1947). Settling approximately one foot or less below the sand’s surface, the clams extend their short incurrent and excurrent siphons just above the sand, filtering out small food particles (Coe, 1947).
    [Show full text]
  • United States National Museum
    GREAT INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES EXHIBITION. LONDON, 1883. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. J. CATALOGUE APPARATUS FOR THE CAPTURE OF FISH EXHIBITED BY THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM. R. EDWARD EARLL, Curator of the Fisheries Collections, U. S. National Museum, and Assistant U. S. Fish Commission. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1884. 825 — TABLE OF CONTENTS. A.—APPARATUS OF DIRECT APPLICATION. I.—Hand Implements. * FOR STRIKING. Page. 1. Unarmed clubs 9 Seal clubs - 9 Fish clubs 9 Drawings illustrative of fisheries in which clubs are employed 10 ** FOR CUTTING. 2. Knives ---- 10 Aboriginal knives 10 Sheath knives 12 Modern fish-knives 13 Rimming knives or plows 19 Scrapers and inshaves 20 Net-mender's knives 21 21 3. Axes and cutting spades Axes proper - 21 Spades 21 Clam and bait choppers 23 *** FOR THRUSTING. 23 4. Thrusting-spears and prods Lances 23 Prodding instruments 26 II. Implements for Seizure of Objects. 5. Scoops Shovels 27 Dip-nets - 27 Dredges 30 Smooth dredges 30 Toothed dredges and rakes 32 de- * The classification here adopted is, with a few unimportant exceptions, that vised by Prof. G. Brown Goode, and employed by him in his catalogue of the Government exhibit at the Centennial Exhibition at Philadelphia in 1876 of appara- of the fishery apparatus exhibited tus for the capture of animals ; and in his catalogue bv the United States at the Berlin Fisheries Exhibition in 1880. 827 [3] 828 FISHERIES OF THE UNITED STATES. 6. Grasping implements Tongs Nippers 7. Hooked instruments (those used with a single motion, that of hooking).. Single-pointed hooks Gaff-hooks Fish sounders Many-pointed hooks Fish forks or pews Squid forks Many-pointed fish jigs Oulachon rakes Squid jigs 8.
    [Show full text]
  • (Razor) Clam (Ensis Directus Conrad, 1843) Dale F
    NRAC Publication No. 217-2010 University of Maryland, 2113 Animal Science Building College Park, Maryland 20742-2317 Telephone: 301-405-6085, FAX: 301-314-9412 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.nrac.umd.edu Biology of the Atlantic Jacknife (Razor) Clam (Ensis directus Conrad, 1843) Dale F. Leavitt, Roger Williams University, Bristol RI There are many clams that are identified by the com- Anatomy mon name “razor clam”. They gain that moniker due to their overall shape of being long and thin, in the nature The American razor clam is a filter-feeding of an old-time straight razor. Many species of razor bivalve mollusk that is easily recognized due to its clams are favorably recognized for their taste and texture unique shape, where it is 5-8 times longer (anterio-pos- and have been commercially harvested throughout the teriorly) than it is wide and with a shape that describes a world. More recently, interest has been rising about developing methods to farm razor clams. It is important slight arc and does not taper appreciably along its length to understand key aspects of the clam’s basic biology (Figure 1). and natural history before one can start to grow them successfully under controlled conditions. One species that has been identified as having high potential for aquaculture is the Atlantic jack knife or American razor clam, Ensis directus (Figure 1, also identified as Ensis americanus in Europe). A native of the Atlantic seaboard of North America, the Razor clam ranges from Labrador to South Carolina. Our knowledge of this razor clam is somewhat enigmatic given that the bulk of the information on E.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENTS American Samoa
    July 1958 COMMERCIAL FISHERIES REVIEW 19 AND DEVELOPMENTS American Samoa NATIVE FISHERMEN LEARNING LONG-LINE TUNA Looking beyond the Samoan group, the Governor sees FISHING TECHNIQUE: The native Americar Samoans are the possibility of Fijians, Tongans, and other South Pacific learning the long-line method of tuna fishing, which the Islanders joining in a large scale commercial-fishing Japanese have successfully developed. A former naval 50- operation, reaping direct benefit from the valuable fish foot tender has been made available for the project, and which abound in their waters. the Samoan fishermen have demonstrated their ability to catch big fish on a limited commercial scale. The only A substantial amount of fish is being caught by Japa­ limit now seems to be imposed by their boats and fishing nese fishermen in South Pacific waters for sale to the gear, and it has been rumored that the idle M/V Samoa may American Samoa cannery operated on a lease basis by a be leased by the Government of American Samoa for use as large United States west coast canner. The Governor a fishing vessel. feels that the Samoan people should have an opportunity to share in this growing industry. The Samoan crew fishes off Tutuila, in sight of land, and disposes of its catch by selling tuna to the local cannery, The fishing industry has been a great boon to American and other types of fish are sold in Pago Pago direct to the Samoa. The Pago Pago cannery employs between 350 and local popUlation for 10 cents a pound. 400 local people in the processing and packing of the tuna which 30 to 40 Japanese fishing vessels deliver to the The Governor of American Samoa takes a close personal cannery regularly.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Ecology and Wild Resource Use in the Central Bering Sea Area
    COASTAL ECOLOGYAND WILD RESOURCEUSE IN THE CENTRAL BERING SEA AREA: HOOPERBAY AND KWIGILLINGOK by Alice Stickney Technical Paper Number 85 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence September 1984 This research/ was partially funded by ANILCA Federal Aid Funds, administered through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................... V List of Tables .................................................... Vii Acknowledgements .................................................. viii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION.......................................... 1 Background and Resource Issues ........................ 1 Research Design ....................................... 3 The Study Communities ................................. 4 Previous Research ..................................... 8 Research Objectives .................................. 9 Methodology and Data Collection Methods ............... 10 Chapter 2. NATURAL SETTING AND ECOLOGY........................... 15 Regional Profile ...................................... 15 Climate ............................................. 16 Topography .......................................... 17 Ocean Currents and Sea Ice .......................... 18 Village Setting ...................................... 20 Chapter 3 HISTORICAL BACKGROUNDAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT....... 24 Historical Overview of the Study Area ................. 24 Historic Subsistence Patterns ........................ 33 Population Trends
    [Show full text]