DOCSLIB.ORG

Redalyc.ESTUDIO MICOFLORÍSTICO DE LOS HONGOS POLIPOROIDES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Redalyc.ESTUDIO MICOFLORÍSTICO DE LOS HONGOS POLIPOROIDES Polibotánica ISSN: 1405-2768 [email protected] Departamento de Botánica México Romero-Bautista, Leticia; Pulido-Flores, Griselda; Valenzuela, Ricardo ESTUDIO MICOFLORÍSTICO DE LOS HONGOS POLIPOROIDES DEL ESTADO DE HIDALGO, MÉXICO Polibotánica, núm. 29, marzo, 2010, pp. 1-28 Departamento de Botánica Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=62112471001 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Núm. 29, pp. 1-28, ISSN 1405-2768; México, 2010 ESTUDIO MICOFLORÍSTICO DE LOS HONGOS POLIPOROIDES DEL ESTADO DE HIDALGO, MÉXICO Leticia Romero-Bautista y Griselda Pulido-Flores Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, UAEH. Carr. Pachuca-Tulancingo Km 4.5 Apartado Postal 069 Plaza Juárez sn, CP 42000 Col. Centro, Pachuca, Hgo. Correo electrónico: [email protected] Ricardo Valenzuela Laboratorio de Micología, Departamento de Botánica, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, IPN., Plan de Ayala y Carpio sn. Col. Santo Tomás, México, DF, CP11340, México. Correo electrónico: [email protected] RESUMEN the state of Hidalgo, Mexico. These collec- tions were made between 1957 and 2005, Se revisaron 470 especímenes de hongos po- 83 of them by the authors between 1994 and liporoides provenientes de 34 municipios del 2005. The material is deposited primarily in estado de Hidalgo y éstas se efectuaron entre the Herbarium ENCB, but some collections 1957 y 2005 por 120 recolectores, de las are duplicated in the mycotheca of the Uni- cuales 83 especímenes fueron realizadas por versidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo los autores entre 1994 y 2005. El material se (UAEH). The species documented comprise encuentra depositado en el herbario ENCB 104 species in 62 genera, 14 families and 7 con algunos duplicados en la micoteca de la orders. Thirty-six species are new records UAEH. Se identifi caron 104 especies que se for the state of Hidalgo, including one, ubicaron dentro de 62 géneros, agrupados Inonotus ludovicianus (Pat.) Murrill, that en 14 familias y siete órdenes de la clase is the fi rst record for Mexico. Agaricomycetes. Se reportan 36 especies como nuevos registros para Hidalgo e Ino- Key words: Agaricomycetes, Agaricales, notus ludovicianus (Pat.) Murrill se cita por Cantharellales, Gloeophyllales, Hymeno- primera vez para México. chaetales, Polyporales, Russulales, Thele- phorales. Palabras clave: Agaricomycetes, Aga- ricales, Cantharellales, Gloeophyllales, INTRODUCCIÓN Hymenochaetales, Polyporales, Russulales, Thelephorales. El estado de Hidalgo es una de las entidades más pequeñas del país con sólo el 1.07% ABSTRACT de la superfi cie nacional (INEGI, 1992). Sin embargo, posee una gran diversidad de We inventoried 470 specimens of polypore organismos debido a sus diferentes climas fungi originating from 34 municipalities of y tipos de vegetación. Se encuentra ubicado 1 Núm. 29: 1-28 Marzo 2010 en el Altiplano Central del territorio nacional 76, Oaxaca y Tamaulipas con 74 y Quintana sobre una superfi cie cercana a los 21 mil Roo con 73, y entre los menos estudiados kilómetros cuadrados y una población de tendríamos a Nayarit, Querétaro, Tlaxcala y alrededor 2.2 millones de habitantes hasta el Zacatecas con menos de 10 especies conoci- año 2000 (INEGI, 2000). Por su extensión, das. Estudios recientes como el de Raymun- Hidalgo ocupa el 26avo. lugar con relación do y Valenzuela (2003) han incrementado el a los demás estados. número de especies de hongos poliporoides en Oaxaca hasta 111, el de Valenzuela et al. Se localiza entre los 19° 35’ 52” y 21° 25’ (2002, 2004a) en 87 especies para Queréta- 00” de latitud norte, y los 97° 57’ 27” y 99° ro, Díaz-Moreno et al. (2005, 2009) con 65 51’ 51” de longitud oeste. Limita al norte con y 67 especies para Durango y Chihuahua, el estado de San Luis Potosí, al noreste y este respectivamente. con Veracruz, al este y sureste con Puebla, al sur con Tlaxcala y México y al oeste con Algunos trabajos revisados reportan un Querétaro (INEGI ,1992); está constituido número aproximado de 620 especies de por 84 municipios (fi gs. 1 y 2). hongos para el estado de Hidalgo (Varela y Cifuentes 1979; Frutis y Guzmán 1983; En México, los hongos poliporoides han Villarreal y Pérez-Moreno, 1989). En cuanto sido objeto de estudio por diversos autores, a los hongos poliporoides, en el trabajo de en la mayoría de dichos casos estos hongos Bandala et al. (1993) como ya se mencionó, están incluidos en listados micofl orísticos. se habían citado 76 especies, pero en estu- Bandala et al. (1993) señalaron que la no- dios posteriores a este trabajo (Valenzuela menclatura de los poliporoides ha cambiado et al., 1994, 2004a, b, 2005, 2006, 2008) el signifi cativamente, y, como consecuencia, se número de especies de este grupo sólo se presentan grandes confusiones en el empleo incrementó a 84. Por lo que el objetivo del de los nombres de las especies. Guzmán presente trabajo es contribuir al conocimien- y Herrera (1971) y Bandala et al. (1993) to de los hongos poliporoides del estado de realizan una cuidadosa revisión de todas Hidalgo y por ende de México. las especies de poliporáceos citadas para México basándose en todas las fuentes dis- MATERIAL Y MÉTODO ponibles y presentan 357 especies, adscritas a 91 géneros agrupadas en cuatro familias En el presente estudio se revisaron los (tres especies en Fistulinaceae, 21 en Ga- hongos poliporoides que se encuentran nodermataceae, 85 en Hymenochaetaceae y depositados en el Herbario de la Escuela 248 en Polyporaceae s. str.). Estos últimos Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas del IPN autores mencionaron que estos hongos se (ENCB) y se dieron algunos duplicados a la han registrado en 30 de las 32 entidades micoteca de la Universidad Autónoma del federativas del país en donde solamente Estado de Hidalgo. Además, se efectuaron Aguascalientes y Coahuila, aparentemente 10 exploraciones en diferentes municipios carecen de registros. Ellos mismos encon- del estado de Hidalgo comprendidas en- traron al estado de Veracruz como el mejor tre 1994 y 2005, recolectándose más de representado con 186, seguido por Morelos 150 especímenes, de los cuales sólo se con 85, Nuevo León con 84, Hidalgo con han determinado 83, para todos ellos se 2 Romero-Bautista, L. et al.: Estudio micofl orístico de los hongos poliporoides del estado de Hidalgo, México. Fig. 1. Ubicación del estado de Hidalgo dentro de la República Mexicana. Fig. 2. Municipios del estado de Hidalgo. 3 Núm. 29: 1-28 Marzo 2010 siguieron los lineamientos mencionados respectivamente y solamente presentaron por Valenzuela et al. (2002) y Raymundo una especie los Agaricales, Cantharellales y Valenzuela (2003) para su caracteriza- y Thelephorales. Dentro de las familias, ción morfológica. La determinación de las la mejor representada fue la Polyporaceae especies se realizó con las obras y artículos con 20 géneros y 38 especies, siguiéndole especializados que en este grupo de hongos la Hymenochaetaceae con 11 géneros y 24 hay (Overholts, 1953; Pegler, 1964; Lowe, especies y la Fomitopsidaceae con ocho gé- 1966; Bondartsev, 1971; Domànski, 1972; neros y 11 especies. Las familias con menor Domànski et al., 1973; Gilbertson, 1974, número de especies fueron la Gloeophylla- 1976; Ryvarden y Johansen, 1980; Gil- ceae, Schizoporaceae y Meripilaceae con bertson y Ryvarden, 1986, 1987; Núñez y dos especies y la Fistulinaceae, Hydnaceae, Ryvarden, 2000; Ryvarden, 2004, 2005). Phanerochaetaceae y Bankeraceae con una El ordenamiento taxonómico que se utiliza especie. para clasifi car a las especies en el cuadro 2 es el propuesto por Kirk et al. (2008). Los géneros más abundantes fueron Phelli- nus, con ocho especies, Polyporus y Trame- RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN tes con seis especies, Ganoderma con cinco y Coltricia, Inonotus y Coriolopsis con Se estudiaron 470 especímenes provenientes cuatro especies, y las especies que fueron de 34 municipios (95 localidades) del estado más abundantes por el número de especí- de Hidalgo (cuadro 1). Los especímenes de- menes que se recolectaron fueron Trametes positados en el herbario ENCB fueron reco- versicolor (L.) Lloyd con 52 especímenes, lectados desde 1957 hasta 1993, además de Trichaptum abietinum (Dicks.) Ryvarden realizarse exploraciones más recientes por con 36 y Trichaptum biforme (Fr.) Ryvarden los autores entre 1994 y 2005 (se tienen 150 con 26, Coltricia perennis (L.) Murrill con especímenes), considerándose desde 1957 25, Polyporus alveolaris (DC) Bondartsev & hasta 2005 el material proviene del trabajo Singer y Cyclomyces tabacinus (Mont.) Pat. de 120 recolectores. Se determinaron 104 con 18, Climacocystis borealis (Fr.) Kotl. & especies pertenecientes a 62 géneros y 14 Pouzar con 16 y Fomitopsis pinicola (Sw.) familias de los órdenes Agaricales, Cantha- P. Karst. con 15 especímenes. rellales, Gloeophyllales, Hymenochaetales, Polyporales, Russulales y Thelephorales de Se encontraron 36 especies que son nuevos la clase Agaricomycetes. En el cuadro 2, se registros para el estado de Hidalgo, de los enlistan las 104 especies estudiadas dentro cuales el orden Polyporales tiene 17 espe- de sus respectivas familias y órdenes. Con cies, le sigue el Hymenochaetales con 15, dos asteriscos se resalta el nuevo registro después el Russulales con tres y uno en para México, y con un asterisco los que se Agaricales. La familia que tuvo un mayor mencionan por primera vez para el estado número de nuevos registros fue la Hyme- de Hidalgo. nochaetaceae con 15 y le siguió la Polypo- raceae con 12. La especie que se registra El orden Polyporales presentó el mayor por primera vez para México es Inonotus número de géneros (39) y especies (64), si- ludovicianus (véase cuadro 2). guiéndole los Hymenochaetales con 12 y 26 4 Romero-Bautista, L. et al.: Estudio micofl orístico de los hongos poliporoides del estado de Hidalgo, México. En cuanto a su fenología, las especies que se Ganoderma applanatum, Coltricia perennis, encontraron la mayor parte del año fueron: Inonotus cuticularis (Bull.) P.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annotated Check List and Host Index Arizona Wood
    Annotated Check List and Host Index for Arizona Wood-Rotting Fungi Item Type text; Book Authors Gilbertson, R. L.; Martin, K. J.; Lindsey, J. P. Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 28/09/2021 02:18:59 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/602154 Annotated Check List and Host Index for Arizona Wood - Rotting Fungi Technical Bulletin 209 Agricultural Experiment Station The University of Arizona Tucson AÏfJ\fOTA TED CHECK LI5T aid HOST INDEX ford ARIZONA WOOD- ROTTlNg FUNGI /. L. GILßERTSON K.T IyIARTiN Z J. P, LINDSEY3 PRDFE550I of PLANT PATHOLOgY 2GRADUATE ASSISTANT in I?ESEARCI-4 36FZADAATE A5 S /STANT'" TEACHING Z z l'9 FR5 1974- INTRODUCTION flora similar to that of the Gulf Coast and the southeastern United States is found. Here the major tree species include hardwoods such as Arizona is characterized by a wide variety of Arizona sycamore, Arizona black walnut, oaks, ecological zones from Sonoran Desert to alpine velvet ash, Fremont cottonwood, willows, and tundra. This environmental diversity has resulted mesquite. Some conifers, including Chihuahua pine, in a rich flora of woody plants in the state. De- Apache pine, pinyons, junipers, and Arizona cypress tailed accounts of the vegetation of Arizona have also occur in association with these hardwoods. appeared in a number of publications, including Arizona fungi typical of the southeastern flora those of Benson and Darrow (1954), Nichol (1952), include Fomitopsis ulmaria, Donkia pulcherrima, Kearney and Peebles (1969), Shreve and Wiggins Tyromyces palustris, Lopharia crassa, Inonotus (1964), Lowe (1972), and Hastings et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Mushrooms Have Evolved to Be So Promiscuous: Insights from Evolutionary and Ecological Patterns
    fungal biology reviews 29 (2015) 167e178 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fbr Review Why mushrooms have evolved to be so promiscuous: Insights from evolutionary and ecological patterns Timothy Y. JAMES* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA article info abstract Article history: Agaricomycetes, the mushrooms, are considered to have a promiscuous mating system, Received 27 May 2015 because most populations have a large number of mating types. This diversity of mating Received in revised form types ensures a high outcrossing efficiency, the probability of encountering a compatible 17 October 2015 mate when mating at random, because nearly every homokaryotic genotype is compatible Accepted 23 October 2015 with every other. Here I summarize the data from mating type surveys and genetic analysis of mating type loci and ask what evolutionary and ecological factors have promoted pro- Keywords: miscuity. Outcrossing efficiency is equally high in both bipolar and tetrapolar species Genomic conflict with a median value of 0.967 in Agaricomycetes. The sessile nature of the homokaryotic Homeodomain mycelium coupled with frequent long distance dispersal could account for selection favor- Outbreeding potential ing a high outcrossing efficiency as opportunities for choosing mates may be minimal. Pheromone receptor Consistent with a role of mating type in mediating cytoplasmic-nuclear genomic conflict, Agaricomycetes have evolved away from a haploid yeast phase towards hyphal fusions that display reciprocal nuclear migration after mating rather than cytoplasmic fusion. Importantly, the evolution of this mating behavior is precisely timed with the onset of diversification of mating type alleles at the pheromone/receptor mating type loci that are known to control reciprocal nuclear migration during mating.
    [Show full text]
  • ชุดโครงการวิจัย และพัฒนาเห็ด Research and Development on Mushroom
    1 รายงานชุดโครงการวิจัย ชุดโครงการวิจัย และพัฒนาเห็ด Research and Development on Mushroom หัวหน้าชุดโครงการวิจัย อลงกรณ์ กรณ์ทอง Alongkorn Korntong ปี พ.ศ. 2558 2 รายงานชุดโครงการวิจัย ชุดโครงการวิจัย และพัฒนาเห็ด Research and Development on Mushroom หัวหน้าชุดโครงการวิจัย อลงกรณ์ กรณ์ทอง Alongkorn Korntong ปี พ.ศ. 2558 3 คําปรารภ กรมวิชาการเกษตรมีภารกิจเกี่ยวกับการศึกษา วิจัย และพัฒนาพืชให้ได้พืชพันธุ์ดี เพื่อถ่ายทอด เทคโนโลยีการผลิตพืชสู่กลุ่มเปูาหมายทั้งภาครัฐ เอกชน และเกษตรกร ซึ่งการวิจัยและพัฒนาเห็ดก็เป็น ภารกิจหนึ่งของกรมที่ดําเนินการมาตลอด ชุดโครงการวิจัย และพัฒนาเห็ด ประกอบด้วยโครงการวิจัย 3 โครงการคือ โครงการวิจัยและพัฒนา เห็ดเศรษฐกิจสายพันธุ์ใหม่ โครงการวิจัยและพัฒนาการอารักขาเห็ด และ โครงการวิจัยและพัฒนา เทคโนโลยีการใช้วัสดุและอาหารเสริมเพาะเห็ดเศรษฐกิจ ทั้งนี้เพื่อคัดเลือก ผสมพันธุ์ ประเมินสายพันธุ์เห็ด ต่างๆ ให้ได้สายพันธุ์ที่มีคุณภาพและผลผลิตสูงเพื่อส่งเสริมให้เกษตรกรในแต่ละพื้นที่เป็นทางเลือก และ พัฒนาวิธีการเพาะเห็ดที่เหมาะสมในแต่ละพื้นที่และแบบการผลิต ตลอดจนการศึกษาการเก็บรักษาเชื้อพันธุ์ และการศึกษาความหลากหลายของเห็ดในธรรมชาติ อีกทั้งยังศึกษาการใช้วัสดุเหลือใช้ทางการเกษตรและ อุตสาหกรรมอีกหลายชนิด เพื่อเป็นวัสดุเพาะหลักหรืออาหารเสริมสําหรับเพาะเลี้ยงเห็ดทําให้ผู้เพาะเห็ดมี ทางเลือกปัจจัยด้านการผลิตได้เพิ่มขึ้น และรวมการศึกษาวิจัยวิธีการปูองกันกําจัดศัตรูเห็ดที่มีประสิทธิภาพ ซึ่งไม่มีผลกระทบต่อการเจริญและคุณภาพของเห็ด นําไปจัดการกับปัญหาศัตรูเห็ดในระดับฟาร์มเพาะเห็ดได้ เริ่มดําเนินการตั้งแต่ปีงบประมาณ 2554 และสําเร็จลุล่วงในปี 2558 ต้องขอขอบคุณกรมวิชาการเกษตรที่ สนับสนุนงบประมาณ คณะกรรมการที่ปรึกษาวิชาการกรมวิชาการเกษตรและของหน่วยงานต้นสังกัดในการ
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Checklist of Arizona Macrofungi
    A PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST OF ARIZONA MACROFUNGI Scott T. Bates School of Life Sciences Arizona State University PO Box 874601 Tempe, AZ 85287-4601 ABSTRACT A checklist of 1290 species of nonlichenized ascomycetaceous, basidiomycetaceous, and zygomycetaceous macrofungi is presented for the state of Arizona. The checklist was compiled from records of Arizona fungi in scientific publications or herbarium databases. Additional records were obtained from a physical search of herbarium specimens in the University of Arizona’s Robert L. Gilbertson Mycological Herbarium and of the author’s personal herbarium. This publication represents the first comprehensive checklist of macrofungi for Arizona. In all probability, the checklist is far from complete as new species await discovery and some of the species listed are in need of taxonomic revision. The data presented here serve as a baseline for future studies related to fungal biodiversity in Arizona and can contribute to state or national inventories of biota. INTRODUCTION Arizona is a state noted for the diversity of its biotic communities (Brown 1994). Boreal forests found at high altitudes, the ‘Sky Islands’ prevalent in the southern parts of the state, and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa P.& C. Lawson) forests that are widespread in Arizona, all provide rich habitats that sustain numerous species of macrofungi. Even xeric biomes, such as desertscrub and semidesert- grasslands, support a unique mycota, which include rare species such as Itajahya galericulata A. Møller (Long & Stouffer 1943b, Fig. 2c). Although checklists for some groups of fungi present in the state have been published previously (e.g., Gilbertson & Budington 1970, Gilbertson et al. 1974, Gilbertson & Bigelow 1998, Fogel & States 2002), this checklist represents the first comprehensive listing of all macrofungi in the kingdom Eumycota (Fungi) that are known from Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Polypore Diversity in North America with an Annotated Checklist
    Mycol Progress (2016) 15:771–790 DOI 10.1007/s11557-016-1207-7 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Polypore diversity in North America with an annotated checklist Li-Wei Zhou1 & Karen K. Nakasone2 & Harold H. Burdsall Jr.2 & James Ginns3 & Josef Vlasák4 & Otto Miettinen5 & Viacheslav Spirin5 & Tuomo Niemelä 5 & Hai-Sheng Yuan1 & Shuang-Hui He6 & Bao-Kai Cui6 & Jia-Hui Xing6 & Yu-Cheng Dai6 Received: 20 May 2016 /Accepted: 9 June 2016 /Published online: 30 June 2016 # German Mycological Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract Profound changes to the taxonomy and classifica- 11 orders, while six other species from three genera have tion of polypores have occurred since the advent of molecular uncertain taxonomic position at the order level. Three orders, phylogenetics in the 1990s. The last major monograph of viz. Polyporales, Hymenochaetales and Russulales, accom- North American polypores was published by Gilbertson and modate most of polypore species (93.7 %) and genera Ryvarden in 1986–1987. In the intervening 30 years, new (88.8 %). We hope that this updated checklist will inspire species, new combinations, and new records of polypores future studies in the polypore mycota of North America and were reported from North America. As a result, an updated contribute to the diversity and systematics of polypores checklist of North American polypores is needed to reflect the worldwide. polypore diversity in there. We recognize 492 species of polypores from 146 genera in North America. Of these, 232 Keywords Basidiomycota . Phylogeny . Taxonomy . species are unchanged from Gilbertson and Ryvarden’smono- Wood-decaying fungus graph, and 175 species required name or authority changes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Family-Level Classification of the Polyporales (Basidiomycota)
    fungal biology 121 (2017) 798e824 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/funbio A revised family-level classification of the Polyporales (Basidiomycota) Alfredo JUSTOa,*, Otto MIETTINENb, Dimitrios FLOUDASc, € Beatriz ORTIZ-SANTANAd, Elisabet SJOKVISTe, Daniel LINDNERd, d €b f Karen NAKASONE , Tuomo NIEMELA , Karl-Henrik LARSSON , Leif RYVARDENg, David S. HIBBETTa aDepartment of Biology, Clark University, 950 Main St, Worcester, 01610, MA, USA bBotanical Museum, University of Helsinki, PO Box 7, 00014, Helsinki, Finland cDepartment of Biology, Microbial Ecology Group, Lund University, Ecology Building, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden dCenter for Forest Mycology Research, US Forest Service, Northern Research Station, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, 53726, WI, USA eScotland’s Rural College, Edinburgh Campus, King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK fNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172, Blindern, NO 0318, Oslo, Norway gInstitute of Biological Sciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066, Blindern, N-0316, Oslo, Norway article info abstract Article history: Polyporales is strongly supported as a clade of Agaricomycetes, but the lack of a consensus Received 21 April 2017 higher-level classification within the group is a barrier to further taxonomic revision. We Accepted 30 May 2017 amplified nrLSU, nrITS, and rpb1 genes across the Polyporales, with a special focus on the Available online 16 June 2017 latter. We combined the new sequences with molecular data generated during the Poly- Corresponding Editor: PEET project and performed Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses. Ursula Peintner Analyses of our final 3-gene dataset (292 Polyporales taxa) provide a phylogenetic overview of the order that we translate here into a formal family-level classification.
    [Show full text]
  • FUNGI of the SAND PRAIRIE-SCRUB OAK NATURE PRESERVE Illinois Nongame Wildlife Conservation Fund 1993-1994 Small Project Program Report
    0 FUNGI OF THE SAND PRAIRIE-SCRUB OAK NATURE PRESERVE Illinois Nongame Wildlife Conservation Fund 1993-1994 Small Project Program Report August 10, 1994 0 Dr . Andrew S . Methven Botany Department . Eastern Illinois University Charleston, IL 61920 Introduction The vegetation found in the Sand Prairie-Scrub Oak Nature Preserve (nine miles south of Havana, between Bath and Kilbourne, Sec . 23 and parts of Secs . 14 and 26, T20N, R9W', 3PM, Mason Co) is a mosaic of three unique vascular plant communities - sand prairie, savanna, and closed forest . The closed forests in the preserve are dominated by a stable community of shade intolerant trees including black oak (Quercus velutina), blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica), black hickory, (Carya texana), and mockernut hickory (Carya tanentosa) which thrive under xeric conditions in acidic, sandy soils . Despite the number of floristic and ecological studies completed to date on these closed forests, there has been little effort to catalog the fungi which occur in these habitats and assess their ecological role in the maintenance and preservation of the forest . Although the importance of saprobic fungi as agents of decomposition and nutrient recycling is well-established, the role of fungi as mycorrhizal associates with vascular plants has only recently begun to be assessed and understood . Mycorrhizae are unique symbiotic associations which form between fungal hyphae and the roots of vascular plants . Since the fungal hyphae penetrate the soil to a mach greater extent than roots, they have a greater surface area in contact with soil moisture and nutrients than vascular plants . As such, the fungal hyphae facilitate the uptake of water and nutrients from the soil and transport to the plant host .
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    NATURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY of the WHITE OAK POND WATERSHED Ashland, Center Harbor, & Holderness, NH FINAL REPORT [White Oak Pond as seen from the northeast shoreline] Compiled by: Dr. Rick Van de Poll Ecosystem Management Consultants 30 N. Sandwich Rd. Center Sandwich, NH 03227 603‐284‐6851 [email protected] Submitted to: Squam Lakes Conservation Society December 2020 i ii SUMMARY The 2982‐acre White Oak Pond watershed lies at the head of Mill Brook along Route 3 in Holderness, New Hampshire. It includes the 298‐acre, 35‐foot deep White Oak Pond (and islands) and its two primary drainage systems in Holderness, Ashland, and Center Harbor. The watershed forms the western part of the 28,094‐acre Squam Lake Drainage (HUC 010700010502) and lies immediately above Piper Cove on Squam Lake. The two perennial streams total 2.26 miles, with the largest one rising on the north slopes of McCrillis Hill in Center Harbor and flowing northerly, and the slightly smaller one draining an unnamed hill in the eastern corner of Ashland and flowing easterly through a large beaver marsh on Coxboro Road. The watershed is primarily forested, although ponds, wetlands and other surface waters make up a substantial portion of the area (23.8%). Forests are primarily mixed hardwoods and conifers, with an abundance of white pine and red oak that have regenerated from former pastureland. Forested wetlands make up the plurality of the hydric soils areas, where red maple swamps are the most common. Other commercially viable timber species include red spruce, eastern hemlock, sugar maple, yellow birch, beech, and white oak.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diversity and Distribution of Polypores (Basidiomycota
    PLATINUM The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles online OPEN ACCESS every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Communication The diversity and distribution of polypores (Basidiomycota: Aphyllophorales) in wet evergreen and shola forests of Silent Valley National Park, southern Western Ghats, India, with three new records C.K. Adarsh, K. Vidyasagaran & P.N. Ganesh 26 May 2019 | Vol. 11 | No. 7 | Pages: 13886–13909 DOI: 10.11609/jot.3856.11.7.13886-13909 For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies, and Guidelines visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or any of the partners. The journal, the publisher, the host, and the part- Publisher & Host ners are not responsible for the accuracy of the politcal boundaries shown in the maps by the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Estudios En Biodiversidad, Volumen I Griselda Pulido-Flores Universidad Autónoma Del Estado De Hidalgo, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Zea E-Books Zea E-Books 11-24-2015 Estudios en Biodiversidad, Volumen I Griselda Pulido-Flores Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, [email protected] Scott onkM s Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, [email protected] Maritza López-Herrera Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Food Science Commons, Fungi Commons, Marine Biology Commons, Parasitology Commons, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Environmental Health Commons, Population Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Pulido-Flores, Griselda; Monks, Scott; and López-Herrera, Maritza, "Estudios en Biodiversidad, Volumen I" (2015). Zea E-Books. Book 35. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/35 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Zea E-Books at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Zea E-Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Estudios en Biodiversidad Volumen I Editores Griselda Pulido-Flores, Scott Monks, & Maritza López-Herrera Estudios en Biodiversidad Volumen I Editores Griselda Pulido-Flores Scott Monks Maritza López-Herrera Cuerpo Académico de Uso, Manejo y Conservación de la Biodiversidad Zea Books Lincoln, Nebraska 2015 Cuerpo Académico de Uso, Manejo y Conservación de la Biodiversidad Ciudad del Conocimiento Carretera Pachuca-Tulancingo Km 4.5 s/n C. P. 42184, Mineral de la Reforma, Hidalgo, México Text and illustrations copyright © 2015 by the respective authors. All rights reserved. Texto e ilustraciones de autor © 2015 por los respectivos autores.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Fungal Diversity in Ohio Research Thesis Presented In
    An Inventory of Fungal Diversity in Ohio Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with research distinction in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Django Grootmyers The Ohio State University April 2021 1 ABSTRACT Fungi are a large and diverse group of eukaryotic organisms that play important roles in nutrient cycling in ecosystems worldwide. Fungi are poorly documented compared to plants in Ohio despite 197 years of collecting activity, and an attempt to compile all the species of fungi known from Ohio has not been completed since 1894. This paper compiles the species of fungi currently known from Ohio based on vouchered fungal collections available in digitized form at the Mycology Collections Portal (MyCoPortal) and other online collections databases and new collections by the author. All groups of fungi are treated, including lichens and microfungi. 69,795 total records of Ohio fungi were processed, resulting in a list of 4,865 total species-level taxa. 250 of these taxa are newly reported from Ohio in this work. 229 of the taxa known from Ohio are species that were originally described from Ohio. A number of potentially novel fungal species were discovered over the course of this study and will be described in future publications. The insights gained from this work will be useful in facilitating future research on Ohio fungi, developing more comprehensive and modern guides to Ohio fungi, and beginning to investigate the possibility of fungal conservation in Ohio. INTRODUCTION Fungi are a large and very diverse group of organisms that play a variety of vital roles in natural and agricultural ecosystems: as decomposers (Lindahl, Taylor and Finlay 2002), mycorrhizal partners of plant species (Van Der Heijden et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Family-Level Classification of the Polyporales
    fungal biology 121 (2017) 798e824 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/funbio A revised family-level classification of the Polyporales (Basidiomycota) Alfredo JUSTOa,*, Otto MIETTINENb, Dimitrios FLOUDASc, € Beatriz ORTIZ-SANTANAd, Elisabet SJOKVISTe, Daniel LINDNERd, d €b f Karen NAKASONE , Tuomo NIEMELA , Karl-Henrik LARSSON , Leif RYVARDENg, David S. HIBBETTa aDepartment of Biology, Clark University, 950 Main St, Worcester, 01610, MA, USA bBotanical Museum, University of Helsinki, PO Box 7, 00014, Helsinki, Finland cDepartment of Biology, Microbial Ecology Group, Lund University, Ecology Building, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden dCenter for Forest Mycology Research, US Forest Service, Northern Research Station, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, 53726, WI, USA eScotland’s Rural College, Edinburgh Campus, King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK fNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172, Blindern, NO 0318, Oslo, Norway gInstitute of Biological Sciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066, Blindern, N-0316, Oslo, Norway article info abstract Article history: Polyporales is strongly supported as a clade of Agaricomycetes, but the lack of a consensus Received 21 April 2017 higher-level classification within the group is a barrier to further taxonomic revision. We Accepted 30 May 2017 amplified nrLSU, nrITS, and rpb1 genes across the Polyporales, with a special focus on the Available online 16 June 2017 latter. We combined the new sequences with molecular data generated during the Poly- Corresponding Editor: PEET project and performed Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses. Ursula Peintner Analyses of our final 3-gene dataset (292 Polyporales taxa) provide a phylogenetic overview of the order that we translate here into a formal family-level classification.
    [Show full text]