THE CROFTER, December 20131

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE CROFTER, December 20131 1 THE CROFTER, DECEMBER 20131 Scottish Crofting Federation THE CROFTER rooted in our communities The journal of the Scottish Crofting Federation, the only member-led organisation dedicated to the promotion of crofting and the largest association of small-scale food producers in the UK DECEMBER 2013 Number 101 Did the 2010 Questions on Scottish Act equalise availability of Government land sale policy OLLOWING THE Scottish Government's expressing an interest in the land, when, as crofting grants? decision to withdraw part of its Rosal the sales particulars were keen to point out, Fforest estate in Sutherland from communities were cleared from this land and open market sale after public criticism, the it is a deserted wilderness. ROFTING-SPECIFIC grants, SCF asked the government to examine its Putting this land on the market in this way is namely CCAGS and CHGS, policies on the sale of public land, community simply perpetuating a system of land ownership were expected to be extended to ownership and the creation of new crofts. concentrated into few hands, a system the C SCF chair Derek Flyn believes the Rosal Scottish people want to see changed.” owner-occupier crofters by virtue of the Crofting Reform (Scotland) Act 2010. case demonstrates some of the problems He continued “A great deal of effort and The former scheme provides grants caused by the manner in which the Forestry public money has been invested in reforming towards agricultural developments such Commission conducts the process of land crofting. The SG has pledged its commitment as sheds, barns, fencing and other sale. He said: “There is no surprise that to the crofting system and has legislated to permanent improvements; the latter local communities did not come forward Continued on page 3 towards the building of a croft house. As one would expect, myriad regulations control the provision of each, but there is little doubt that these grants are still a major draw for those wishing to build croft houses and/or carry on agricultural activities on their crofts. Before 2010, it was the case that both types of grant assistance ceased to be available to owner-occupier crofters, and therefore this was a major reason to remain a tenant crofter. The Crofting Reform (Scotland) Act 2010 was intended to equalise owner- occupier crofters and tenant crofters, both in terms of the regulatory framework to which they were subject, and also the financial assistance which was available to them. However, the regulations which are required in order to facilitate the extension of financial assistance to owner-occupier crofters have only been passed in respect of CCAGS, not in respect of the CHGS. Eilidh Ross approached the Scottish Government for a comment on this matter Continued on page 3 LOCATION Rosal Forest is located within one INof theSI fewDE remaining TH ISwilderness ISSU TheE forest is shown on the location plan within these sale Human settlement in this area dates back at least 6,000 years, but areas in the north of Scotland. The area is known as Strathnaver particulars and inCrofters’ more detail on the sale plan enclosed. voice The Strathnaver heard is known more for the in Sutherland Clearances of the and Naver Forest, renowned for its excellent salmon and trout forest can also be found on 0S 1:50,000 sheets 10 and 16, with 1800’s when the locals were displaced from their lands to re-settle fishing and deer stalking. The• SCFforest itself gathering adjoins the report River the main entrance located at Grid Reference NC 701 414. on the coast or travel by sea to the eastern seaboard of America Naver and its tributary, the River• Mallart.CAP updateAlthough the forest is parliament onand New goose Zealand to make way forpetition a new era of sheep farming. situated in quite a remote location, there is good access on to the HISTORICAL NOTE Indeed, within Rosal Forest there are many historical features B871 public road heading south •to KinbraceScottish and onkye to Helmsdale HE SCF appeared before the Scottishdating backexisting to this periodgoose and management beyond. The ruined programmes; settlements Nabaros - The Naver -parliamentary is one of the oldest petitions names forcommittee a river to and assign additional resources to crop meeting with the A9 trunk road and south to Inverness. recorded in Britain and pre-dates the known languages of the of Rosal Village in the north of the forest and Truderscaig in • Shed design defend its call for the government tothe do south, protection provide a fascinatingand adaptiveinsight into themanagement struggle for There are regional airports situated at Wick, 70 miles to the north, area. The meaningT originates from a root word ‘nabh’ found more about the escalating numbers of geese programmes to ensure this threat to the in Greek, Latin and Sanskrit meaning ‘cloud’ or ‘wet cloud’, to ownership of this land. and Inverness, 82 miles to the south.• Animal Both airports health provide car devastating crofters’ crops. future of crofting is averted. which the Gaels added Strath and gave the name Strathnaver. hire and helicopter charters are available from Inverness airport. SCF director Roddy MacDonald and chief Roddy said “The MSPs were very attentive The nearest railway station is in• Kinbrace,Shetland a short cattle car journey embryos executive Patrick Krause defended the SCF and sympathetic to the issue and in an unusual from the forest. • A view from a petition, calling on the Scottish Parliament to move for this committee, apparently, referred the Crofting Commissioner urge the Scottish Government to address the petition directly to the committee for rural affairs. problems created by increasing populations of This is a very good outcome for crofters. There and much more wild geese in the crofting areas as a matter of is a way to go yet but we are seeing progress, in priority; reassess its decision to stop funding that the parliament is taking this very seriously.” 2 THE CROFTER, DECEMBER 2013 Message from the chair... Derek Flyn significant role in the lives of many the boundaries of the croft in the in sunshine. The SCF meeting crofting communities. You will find Crofting Register. at Lerwick was well attended full coverage of the event in the Observers will be aware that by members. The topic was centre pages. a glitch in the law required to the introduction of the Crofting SCF has been encouraging be rectified this year and an Register. I was pleased to have crofting community mapping as amendment was passed at the opportunity to present honorary a way to develop a collective Holyrood with the active support life membership of SCF to Norman approach. The new national of SCF. Having heard what we Leask in the company of his own Crofting Register will provide a had to say, MSPs were sufficiently folk. A pleasant task indeed. definitive map-based record of all persuaded to recommend to the As we go to press, the Crofting land within crofting tenure and we Scottish Government that further Commission is consulting on have worked closely with Registers plans be made to ensure crofting a new grazings regulations of Scotland in its preparation. law is clear, consistent and fit for the template and the duty to report There is now a clear demarcation 21st century. form. Much discussion has UR ANNUAL gathering in between the regulation of crofting, A well-supported SCF petition already taken place on the duty of September took place in which is in the domain of the calls on the government to do more a grazings committee to report on OStornoway Town Hall and Crofting Commission in Inverness, about the escalating numbers of both their common grazing and was well attended. and the registration of crofts in the geese devastating crofters’ crops. on the crofts of the shareholders. The theme was “Common Crofting Register in Edinburgh. This required our chief executive The hope is that, with refreshed grazings: utilizing potential” – From now on, all actions triggered Patrick Krause and director Roddy regulations, crofting communities with the intention of stimulating by a regulatory application to the MacDonald from South Uist to will become more self-reliant and activity on this extensive resource. Crofting Commission for approval, attend the petitions committee at business-like. Common grazings make up a such as assignation or decrofting, Holyrood to state our case. We were calling for this at our large proportion of land covered must be accompanied by an In October, Patrick and I visited gathering in Stornoway so it is by crofting tenure and can play a application to register or update Shetland and found it basking something that we must support. Our man in Brussels Crofting acronyms E CONTINUE TO FIGHT that as machinery and tags do not on several fronts for you produce 100% accuracy it is unfair These acronyms are used throughout The Crofter. in Brussels. to expect the crofter to have 100% W BnG Bòrd na Gàidhlig By the time you receive this, results, thus meaning that cross- the CAP figures will be presented compliance records should not CAB Citizens Advice Bureau by the Scottish Government. require 100% accuracy. EID will CC Crofting Commission I do hope that they and the never be fit for purpose until we CCAGS Crofting Counties Agricultural Grants Scheme Westminster government will put get back to the batch system that CHGS Scottish Croft House Grant Scheme their ideological differences to bed stopped the 2001 foot and mouth CLS Community Land Scotland at this time and use what we have outbreak at the borders of Scotland CnES Comhairle nan Eilean Siar made possible when negotiating and sorted out the 2007 outbreak.
Recommended publications
  • RHS Supreme Champions 2017
    RHASS MAGAZINE SUMMER 2017 What a ShowStoppER! RHS Supreme Champions 2017: 8-page pullout + Post-Show Overview + New Members’ Area Survey + Technical Innovation Awards + Exhibitors Stories + RHASS Directors and Presidential Team 2017-18 + RHET Latest News + RHC Events to look out for RHASS • Society Magazine • Summer 2017 | 1 6 Contents COVER STORIES 6 Post-Show Overview 21 RHET News 24 RHC Events 13 26 RHASS Directors and Officials 2017 28 RHASS Presidential Team FEATURES 3 Welcome - Alan Laidlaw, Chief Executive 4 News Update 6 Royal Highland Show - Post-Show Analysis 21 8 Case Studies - “What the Royal Highland Show means to me...” 10 Technical Innovation Awards 13 Supreme Champions 2017 Pullout 21 Royal Highland Education Trust News 24 Royal Highland Centre Events 30 Members’ Feedback 24 RHASS MAGAZINE SUMMER 2017 CONTACT DETAILS: RHASS Society magazine Written & produced by is published by: The Royal Highland and Represent Agricultural Society of Scotland, Royal Highland 57 Calton Road, Centre, Ingliston, Edinburgh EH28 8NB Edinburgh EH8 8FJ Tel: (0131) 335 6200 [email protected] What a Email: [email protected] ShowStoppER! Web: www.rhass.org.uk RHS Supreme Champions 2017: 8-page pullout + Post-Show Overview + New Members’ Area Survey + Technical Innovation Awards + Exhibitors Stories Charity No. SC4561 + RHASS Directors and Presidential Team 2017-18 + RHET Latest News + RHC Events to look out for RHASS • Society Magazine • Summer 2017 | 1 2 | RHASS • Society Magazine • Summer 2017 Over 8,000 members attended the Show on each of the four days Welcome from RHASS Chief Executive Alan Laidlaw t is with pride that I reflect on my first Show as Chief Executive.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of GDP Sites 2019
    Register of GDP Sites 2019 Updated 16 August 2019 There are other sites authorised for wholesale dealing of veterinary medicinal products which do not appear on this register. These sites wholesale deal in both human and veterinary medicinal products and can be found on the MHRA section of GOV.UK: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/human-and-vetinary-medicines- register-of-licensed-wholesale-distribution-sites-december-2014 Register of Authorised Wholesale Dealer Sites Authorisation Holder: WDA33618 ABBEYVET LLP 310 CHESTER ROAD, HARTFORD, NORTHWICH, CHESHIRE, CW8 2AB SITE ID: S0415 ABBEYVET LLP 310 CHESTER ROAD, HARTFORD, NORTHWICH, CHESHIRE, CW8 2AB SITE ID: S0010 ABBEYVET LLP SHERBURN ENTERPRISE PARK, SHERBURN IN ELMET, LEEDS, WEST YORKSHIRE, LS25 6NB Authorisation Holder: WDA8599 AGRIHEALTH (N.I.) LIMITED 9 SILVERWOOD INDUSTRIAL AREA, SILVERWOOD ROAD, LURGAN, CRAIGAVON, COUNTY ARMAGH, BT66 6LN SITE ID: S0015 AGRIHEALTH (N.I.) LIMITED 9 SILVERWOOD INDUSTRIAL AREA, SILVERWOOD ROAD, LURGAN, CRAIGAVON, COUNTY ARMAGH, BT66 6LN Authorisation Holder: WDA5097 ALBAVET LIMITED BUSINESS INCUBATOR OFFICE 21, MYREGORMIE PLACE, MITCHELSTON INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, KIRKCALDY, FIFE, KY1 3NA SITE ID: S0456 ALBAVET LIMITED BUSINESS INCUBATOR OFFICE 21, MYREGORMIE PLACE, MITCHELSTON INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, KIRKCALDY, FIFE, KY1 3NA SITE ID: S0525 CVS GROUP PLC CVS HOUSE, OWEN ROAD, DISS, NORFOLK, IP22 4ER Authorisation Holder: WDA5030 ALBERT E JAMES & SON LIMITED BARROW MILL BARROW STREET, BARROW GURNEY, BRISTOL, BS48 3RU SITE ID: S0303 ALBERT E JAMES &
    [Show full text]
  • CATAIR Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA February 12, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes.......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint Report
    EXHIBIT A ARKANSAS LIVESTOCK & POULTRY COMMISSION #1 NATURAL RESOURCES DR. LITTLE ROCK, AR 72205 501-907-2400 Complaint Report Type of Complaint Received By Date Assigned To COMPLAINANT PREMISES VISITED/SUSPECTED VIOLATOR Name Name Address Address City City Phone Phone Inspector/Investigator's Findings: Signed Date Return to Heath Harris, Field Supervisor DP-7/DP-46 SPECIAL MATERIALS & MARKETPLACE SAMPLE REPORT ARKANSAS STATE PLANT BOARD Pesticide Division #1 Natural Resources Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 Insp. # Case # Lab # DATE: Sampled: Received: Reported: Sampled At Address GPS Coordinates: N W This block to be used for Marketplace Samples only Manufacturer Address City/State/Zip Brand Name: EPA Reg. #: EPA Est. #: Lot #: Container Type: # on Hand Wt./Size #Sampled Circle appropriate description: [Non-Slurry Liquid] [Slurry Liquid] [Dust] [Granular] [Other] Other Sample Soil Vegetation (describe) Description: (Place check in Water Clothing (describe) appropriate square) Use Dilution Other (describe) Formulation Dilution Rate as mixed Analysis Requested: (Use common pesticide name) Guarantee in Tank (if use dilution) Chain of Custody Date Received by (Received for Lab) Inspector Name Inspector (Print) Signature Check box if Dealer desires copy of completed analysis 9 ARKANSAS LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY COMMISSION #1 Natural Resources Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 (501) 225-1598 REPORT ON FLEA MARKETS OR SALES CHECKED Poultry to be tested for pullorum typhoid are: exotic chickens, upland birds (chickens, pheasants, pea fowl, and backyard chickens). Must be identified with a leg band, wing band, or tattoo. Exemptions are those from a certified free NPIP flock or 90-day certificate test for pullorum typhoid. Water fowl need not test for pullorum typhoid unless they originate from out of state.
    [Show full text]
  • ACE Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA August 13, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes .......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers ........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shetland Cattle: Breed Analysis Report; December 2016
    Shetland Cattle: Breed Analysis Report; December 2016 Lawrence Alderson [email protected] The first annual report appeared fifteen years ago and usually has followed a standard pattern. During that time some items have deviated very little. For example, the contributions of founder animals have shown very small variations and can be reviewed safely at longer intervals provided that a close watch is kept on any line or family that threatens to disappear. The previous two reports also dealt in some detail with explanations and evaluations of topics such as inbreeding, GCI, and diversity. Therefore this year the focus will be more on items that members are able to use in the development of breeding programmes taking into account not only decisions at an individual herd (or even animal) level, but also those that affect the ongoing genetic security of the breed. Once again I’m grateful for the input of all those who have assisted in providing the information necessary to prepare the report, especially Peter Hardman who does the initial number crunching. Information on bulls used in 2016 (and intended to use in 2017) is particularly helpful and the work of Paddy Zakaria in the northern areas and Alan Yarker and Barry Allen in England and Wales makes my task much easier. The report follows the approximate format of previous years in order to enable easy comparison. The first (historical) section deals with population trends, genetic analyses and analysis of the 2015 calf crop. The second (future action) section deals with bull selection and calf crops from 2017 and onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Breed Analysis Report 2014
    Shetland Cattle: Breed Analysis Report; November 2014 Lawrence Alderson [email protected] Although we kept track of the population of Shetland cattle previously, the systematic regular analysis of the annual calf crop did not begin until 2001. Since that time it has been possible to have a clearer understanding of the structure of the breed and to identify any potential problems or note preferred breeding plans. Last year I reviewed progress during the decade 2003-2012, but in this report I have taken the opportunity to extend the comparisons to cover the whole period 2001-2013. Some of the news is good, while some issues deserve more critical evaluation, but hopefully the report will enable useful decisions to be taken at both breed and herd level. Although I write the report it is a team effort which has relied on help and cooperation from Alan Yarker, Peter Hardman, Paddy Zakaria, Albin Smith, Barry and Cath Allen and many other members who provided information. The report follows the approximate format of previous years in order to facilitate easy comparison. Population trends Annual calf registrations are the preferred indicator of a breed’s security and easier to record than the number of breeding cows or other measures. Total registrations in 2001 were 170, although FMD undermined confidence in that year. Numbers increased in the next few years as the breed continued to expand, but the impact of the economic downturn of 2007/8 was a setback which is reflected in the reduced registrations in 2009 (Figure 1), and thereafter a more rigorous application of commercial values led to more delayed registrations and crossbreeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Genetic Resources Information Bulletin
    i CONTENTS EDITORIAL ........................................................................................................................................... iii GUIDE TO CONTRIBUTORS ................................................................................................................ v RUMINANT LIVESTOCK GENETIC RESOURCES IN CYPRUS A. Constantinou ..................................................................................................................................... 1 THE NATIVE PIG OF SRI LANKA R. Rajamahendran, V. Ravindran, L.A. Goonewardene, P. Sahaayaruban and A.S.B. Rajaguru ............. 9 THE BARROSO CATTLE OF GUATEMALA R. A. Melgar, Romeo Solano and Jorge De Alba ................................................................................. 15 HUNGARIAN ACTIVITIES ON THE CONSERVATION OF DOMESTIC ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES Imre Bodó ............................................................................................................................................ 19 PRESERVATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF ONGOLE CATTLE Mullapudi Narendra Nath ..................................................................................................................... 27 THE CONSERVATION OF ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES IN GREAT BRITAIN Lawrence Alderson .............................................................................................................................. 31 NEWS ITEMS .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Home Farm, Temple Newsam Scrutiny Inquiry Report
    Review of Home Farm, Temple Newsam Scrutiny Inquiry Report 1 Review of Home Farm, Temple Newsam Inquiry Report Published 18 th May 2011 Introduction and Scope the outcome of the consultation and to Introduction submit a report and recommendations to 1. The Scrutiny Board (City Development) the Scrutiny Board in May 2011 for at its meeting on 8 th March 2011 consideration. It was also agreed that considered requests for scrutiny of the representatives from the Rare Breed farming operations at Home Farm, Survival Trust and Rare Breeds Temple Newsam. The requests for International be invited to the meeting of scrutiny were from the Rare Breed the working group. Survival Trust, Rare Breeds International, the Shetland Cattle 6. The working group’s findings which are Breeders Association, the White Park endorsed by full Scrutiny Board and Cattle Society and a number of recommendations are presented below. individuals who feared for the future of Home Farm and the rare breed centre. Scope of the Inquiry 2. They were responding to the City Development Directorate’s “Farming 7. The purpose of our inquiry was to Operations Consultation” document identify areas of savings that would which had been circulated in December allow Home Farm to continue as a 2010 to all key stakeholders and other commercial working farm whilst also interested parties. This stated that continuing as a visitor and rare breed “savings” needed to be made at Home centre. Farm, suggested ways this could be achieved and invited comments and alternative proposals. Anticipated Service Impact 3. At the Scrutiny Board meeting on 8 th March 2011 Parks and Countryside 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopedia of Historic and Endangered Livestock and Poultry
    Yale Agrarian Studies Series James C. Scott, series editor 6329 Dohner / THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF HISTORIC AND ENDANGERED LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY BREEDS / sheet 1 of 528 Tseng 2001.11.19 14:07 Tseng 2001.11.19 14:07 6329 Dohner / THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF HISTORIC AND ENDANGERED LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY BREEDS / sheet 2 of 528 Janet Vorwald Dohner 6329 Dohner / THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF HISTORIC AND ENDANGERED LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY BREEDS / sheet 3 of 528 The Encyclopedia of Historic and Endangered Livestock and Poultry Breeds Tseng 2001.11.19 14:07 6329 Dohner / THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF HISTORIC AND ENDANGERED LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY BREEDS / sheet 4 of 528 Copyright © 2001 by Yale University. Published with assistance from the Louis Stern Memorial Fund. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Designed by Sonia L. Shannon Set in Bulmer type by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Printed in the United States of America by Jostens, Topeka, Kansas. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dohner, Janet Vorwald, 1951– The encyclopedia of historic and endangered livestock and poultry breeds / Janet Vorwald Dohner. p. cm. — (Yale agrarian studies series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-300-08880-9 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Rare breeds—United States—Encyclopedias. 2. Livestock breeds—United States—Encyclopedias. 3. Rare breeds—Canada—Encyclopedias. 4. Livestock breeds—Canada—Encyclopedias. 5. Rare breeds— Great Britain—Encyclopedias.
    [Show full text]
  • 65 3.2.2 South West 3.2.2.1 EXMOOR
    3.2.2 South West 3.2.2.1 EXMOOR LOCATION, LANDSCAPE AND LAND COVER Straddling the border between Devon and Somerset, the Exmoor National Park covers an area of 693km². “The central moorlands are a landscape of grass, heather and bilberry, largely devoid of settlement. Their remote upland character is emphasised by wandering groups of Exmoor ponies and occasional glimpses of red deer. On the outer edges of Exmoor and the Brendon Hills, heather moorland is common but the central areas of Exmoor are often seemingly vast sheets of purple moor grass, bleached almost white for much of the year. Hutton describes this landscape as 'a bare rolling waste very like the sea, with its long heaving monotony of grey water, without a voice, without life and without human habitation, there is only the sound of wind and of running water'. In the south, at the transition to the Culm, the moorland is wetter and more fragmented, with gorse, bracken and heather.” (Natural England JCA 145) Unlike Bodmin and Dartmoor, where the bulk of the moorland is common land, here the commons (see Fig 3.18) account for only 4,811ha (about a quarter of the total moorland area). The major block of common land (around 1,750ha) lies to the northwest, on the Devon side of the border, and forms part of the North Exmoor SSSI. The other significant areas of common are Dunkery Hill (644ha and at 519m the highest point on Exmoor), Withypool Common (787ha) and Winsford Hill (586ha), the last 2 being part of the South Exmoor SSSI.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 MED-Project Annual Report
    2019 MED-Project Annual Report Alameda County, California March 1, 2020 Prepared By: MED-Project LLC Submitted To: Alameda County, Department of Environmental Health Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 4 Participating Producers ....................................................................................................... 5 Collection Method and Weight ............................................................................................ 5 A. Kiosks .................................................................................................................................... 5 B. Mail-Back Packages ................................................................................................................. 5 C. Take-Back Events ................................................................................................................... 5 D. Total Weight of Collected Unwanted Medicine ........................................................................... 5 Kiosk Drop-Off Locations, Mail-Back Distribution, and Take-Back Events ......................... 5 Kiosk Drop-Off Locations ......................................................................................................... 6 Mail-Back Package Distribution Locations .................................................................................. 6 Number of Mail-Back Packages Provided to Home-Bound and Under Served Residents ...............
    [Show full text]